Date: 18/04/2024 21:30:05
From: monkey skipper
ID: 2145968
Subject: Living without oxygen

https://www.caryinstitute.org/news-insights/feature/breathing-lessons-living-without-oxygen#:~:text=In%20the%20Earth%27s%20many%20secret%20places%2C%20like%20swamp,oxygen%2C%20they%20%22breathe%22%20nitrate%20or%20sulfate%20or%20iron.

This subject piqued my curiousity a little while ago but could not find the original article or find the utube videa to re-visit.

Most of us learned in school that plants produce oxygen and consume carbon dioxide, while animals (like us) consume organic matter (such as carrots and burritos) and oxygen and produce carbon dioxide. These relationships keep our planet in a nice balance for both plants and animals. They are easy to remember, but leave out some interesting parts of the story.

Living things need energy to maintain order — blossoms, membranes, beating hearts — in the face of the forces of entropy and chaos. Plants get energy from the sun, producing oxygen and consuming carbon dioxide in the process. We get energy from the food that we eat, which ultimately comes from sunlight by way of plants.

But these are not the only sources of energy that living things can use. In the Earth’s many secret places, like swamp soils, deep lakes and ocean sediments, there is no oxygen at all, but bacteria, fungi and even a few animals still are able to consume organic matter — dead bits of plants, animals and other bacteria. Instead of taking in oxygen, they “breathe” nitrate or sulfate or iron. They produce carbon dioxide, too, but also substances like nitrogen gas or sulfide or methane.

You may never have heard of such species, but you are familiar with their work. The wine we drink and the rotten-egg smell of pond mud are products of organisms that live and work in habitats without oxygen.

What is essential for life is not that there is oxygen to breathe or organic matter to eat, but that there is an energy source. The list of possible chemical reactions that could be exploited for energy capture is long, and enterprising organisms survive using dozens of chemical reactions other than the simple oxygen-carbon dioxide reactions of the typical biology textbook. And not all photosynthesis produces oxygen, either, but that’s a story for another time.

It seems odd to think life can exist without oxygen, but the earliest forms of life on our planet did not need it. In fact, there wasn’t even any oxygen in the Earth’s atmosphere until about 2.5 billion years after life arose. When oxygen first began appearing on Earth as a product of photosynthesis, it was a deadly poison to early life forms. However, through the long process of natural selection, most living things have evolved to tolerate oxygen — and even benefit from it.

Here are two important lessons about the versatility of life. First, these unfamiliar organisms that live without oxygen are essential to the persistence of life on Earth. If all consumers required oxygen, all the dead material in the Earth’s many oxygen-free zones would simply pile up there, unable to decay.

Second, you should be able to see now why it is so hard to tell whether there is life on another planet. What would you look for? Living things don’t necessarily produce oxygen or carbon dioxide, and they don’t necessarily need water or carbon, or any other single substance. They need to be able to capture energy to maintain some kind of order against the chaos of the universe. The ways in which they capture this energy could be fantastically varied, depending on the opportunities offered by some alien planet.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/04/2024 00:20:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2145988
Subject: re: Living without oxygen

monkey skipper said:

https://www.caryinstitute.org/news-insights/feature/breathing-lessons-living-without-oxygen#:~:text=In%20the%20Earth%27s%20many%20secret%20places%2C%20like%20swamp,oxygen%2C%20they%20%22breathe%22%20nitrate%20or%20sulfate%20or%20iron.

January 3, 2010

Life is so complex that it is unreasonable to think we could learn all about it in school. It does seem a pity that many textbooks leave out some of the best parts.

Seems a bit unfair, given that we learnt and teach about anaerobic metabolism in at latest Year 7.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/04/2024 07:18:53
From: monkey skipper
ID: 2146000
Subject: re: Living without oxygen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxidation_Event

The Great Oxidation Event (GOE) or Great Oxygenation Event, also called the Oxygen Catastrophe, Oxygen Revolution, Oxygen Crisis or Oxygen Holocaust, was a time interval during the Early Earth’s Paleoproterozoic era when the Earth’s atmosphere and the shallow ocean first experienced a rise in the concentration of oxygen. This began approximately 2.460–2.426 Ga (billion years) ago during the Siderian period and ended approximately 2.060 Ga ago during the Rhyacian. Geological, isotopic, and chemical evidence suggests that biologically produced molecular oxygen (dioxygen or O2) started to accumulate in Earth’s atmosphere and changed it from a weakly reducing atmosphere practically devoid of oxygen into an oxidizing one containing abundant free oxygen, with oxygen levels being as high as 10% of their present atmospheric level by the end of the GOE.

The sudden injection of highly reactive free oxygen, toxic to the then-mostly anaerobic biosphere, may have caused the extinction of many organisms on Earth—mostly archaeal colonies that used retinal to utilize green-spectrum light energy and power a form of anoxygenic photosynthesis (see Purple Earth hypothesis). Although the event is inferred to have constituted a mass extinction, due in part to the great difficulty in surveying microscopic organisms’ abundances, and in part to the extreme age of fossil remains from that time, the Great Oxidation Event is typically not counted among conventional lists of “great extinctions”, which are implicitly limited to the Phanerozoic eon. In any case, isotope geochemistry data from sulfate minerals have been interpreted to indicate a decrease in the size of the biosphere of >80% associated with changes in nutrient supplies at the end of the GOE.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/04/2024 07:32:37
From: monkey skipper
ID: 2146002
Subject: re: Living without oxygen

SCIENCE said:

monkey skipper said:

https://www.caryinstitute.org/news-insights/feature/breathing-lessons-living-without-oxygen#:~:text=In%20the%20Earth%27s%20many%20secret%20places%2C%20like%20swamp,oxygen%2C%20they%20%22breathe%22%20nitrate%20or%20sulfate%20or%20iron.

January 3, 2010

Life is so complex that it is unreasonable to think we could learn all about it in school. It does seem a pity that many textbooks leave out some of the best parts.

Seems a bit unfair, given that we learnt and teach about anaerobic metabolism in at latest Year 7.

I should have picked an article focusing on the subject rather than the extra push from the article writer and their personal issue around communicating this to the wider community.

It was interesting to understand the importance of what they do in the environment in the bigger picture though. I have this personal view that water on earth would restarts any mass extinction of our future , this article adds another confirming piece to that assumption to me , as life in the water has the small building blocks.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/04/2024 07:35:22
From: monkey skipper
ID: 2146003
Subject: re: Living without oxygen

monkey skipper said:


SCIENCE said:

monkey skipper said:

https://www.caryinstitute.org/news-insights/feature/breathing-lessons-living-without-oxygen#:~:text=In%20the%20Earth%27s%20many%20secret%20places%2C%20like%20swamp,oxygen%2C%20they%20%22breathe%22%20nitrate%20or%20sulfate%20or%20iron.

January 3, 2010

Life is so complex that it is unreasonable to think we could learn all about it in school. It does seem a pity that many textbooks leave out some of the best parts.

Seems a bit unfair, given that we learnt and teach about anaerobic metabolism in at latest Year 7.

I should have picked an article focusing on the subject rather than the extra push from the article writer and their personal issue around communicating this to the wider community.

edits-

It was interesting to understand the importance of what they do in the environment in the bigger picture though. I have this personal view that water on earth would restart life after any mass extinction in our future , this article adds another confirming piece to that assumption to me , as life in the water has the small building blocks. The chemical processes to release those into a oxygen low or nil enviroment.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/04/2024 15:42:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2146203
Subject: re: Living without oxygen

monkey skipper said:

monkey skipper said:

SCIENCE said:

January 3, 2010

Life is so complex that it is unreasonable to think we could learn all about it in school. It does seem a pity that many textbooks leave out some of the best parts.

Seems a bit unfair, given that we learnt and teach about anaerobic metabolism in at latest Year 7.

I should have picked an article focusing on the subject rather than the extra push from the article writer and their personal issue around communicating this to the wider community.

edits-

It was interesting to understand the importance of what they do in the environment in the bigger picture though. I have this personal view that water on earth would restart life after any mass extinction in our future , this article adds another confirming piece to that assumption to me , as life in the water has the small building blocks. The chemical processes to release those into a oxygen low or nil enviroment.

Sorry it wasn’t a criticism just a defence* of education. We agree that restricting learning of biology to aerobics only is missing much good stuff.

*: not in the line of “we have a right to defend ourselves” either

Reply Quote