Date: 9/05/2025 15:58:24
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2280546
Subject: re: Consider

SCIENCE said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

SCIENCE said:

what, that requiring wavefuncs to “collapse” is just a simplifying convenience so there is nothing more to explain

sure

My interpretation of what they said is that there is no collapse because there is no wavefunction. Every particle has a well defined path and position all the time. We just don’t know what it is until we observe it.

Is this consistent with all available evidence? Double slit experiments for instance?

oh well we thought they said they were finding ways to make valid wavefuncs so perhaps our interpretations differ after all

I’ll re-read it.

Incidentally, latest N-S has something about how the double-slit thing could work with particles, but I haven’t read it yet.

Reply Quote View full thread