Witty Rejoinder said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

transition said:

it’s tough, i’ve seen similar denial before, the possibility that rainbows don’t exist is more than most can tolerate, an intolerable idea

i’m here for you, rev, to see you through the impending ontological crisis

Very generous of you mr. t, but you really don’t need to worry. If you want to define “exist” in such a way that rainbows do not “exist”, that’s just fine with me, no crisis or crises required.

I will continue to use the ordinary definition of the word though.

Try convince Onty that he doesn’t exist. That will shut him up.

Well obviously the whole lot of you are just figments of the computer simulation that generates an entity that thinks it is one of 8 billion similar entities living on a small planet that is part of a huge universe with countless other stars, planets, and such like.