SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

SCIENCE said:

we mean we agree: it sounds like Obama holds a principle that good work should be fairly remunerated, and sets an example of how that may be done with meaningful contributions from taxpayers; while kkk is well aware that he needs no further pocket money on top of the nepotismic grift, feels that receiving money from taxpayers is beneath him, and doesn’t require a large staff to do what is basically cosmetic worship

It was another of his feints. Taking gobfuls with the other hand while pretending to look good.

we still remember: when apologists everywhere would insist and tell us that politicians get paid so much as a way of buttressing them against the lure of corruption

we ask the apologists: is that still the case, is it still a valid strategy

we suggest: it being the case, then when a politician turns down the buttress-against-corruption-pay, what are they planning

I remember when Australia was run by graziers, rich graziers who used to get dressed for dinner and everything.