Arts said:

Cymek said:

Arts said:

I’m wondering why it’s taking me so long to motivate myself to mark these very short assessment pieces… and now I realise it’s because I feel sad for the many students that used AI ..

the assessment is broadly a base knowledge demonstration of theories of punishment, purposes of punishment, and justify what parts of the theories should apply to a case study (that I provided) which will scaffold to a second assessment where the case study will be used to design the ideal journey through the CJS.

in one section they were to take two of the references they used in the body of the work and write a short annotation and justify why it applies to their case study.

here is just one example:

they cited this work: Linderborg, O. (2024). Early Theories of Punishment: Deterrence, Rehabilitation and Restoration in Ancient Greek and Indian Penology. Law, Crime & History, 12(1), 118
and said (or rather AI said)
“ show early and modern theories of punishment…”

so i go to the source.. the abstract clearly states This study examines ancient penology, focusing on literary sources from ancient Greece and India as the primary material for analysis. The theories of punishment encountered in these texts are analysed by applying theoretical concepts of modern penology. The study indicates that attempts to rationalize punishment and provide alternatives to traditional retributive and deterrent approaches to penology date back far earlier than is commonly presumed, specifically to the axial age in Greece and India (800-200 BCE).

close, but no cigar – that is not at all what this work was about… and it is an example of how AI chooses key words only and states good enough.

Are they studying justice and/or social work ?

they are criminology students. the unit is called Corrections… it’s the one a number of your coworkers come out to lecture at.

we mean in a twisted case of life imitating life, plenty of students chooses key words only and states good enough