Witty Rejoinder said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

What about that crowd that decided the possibility that a baby might have been carried off by a dingo did not constitute “reasonable doubt”?

What if that crowd had been better informed, would they have made the same decision ?

What about all the other law cases where informed jurors would have made better decisions.

Define better decision.

Good question.