SCIENCE said:

Arts said:

SCIENCE said:

well you know freedom of speech innocent until proven guilty what law is being broken here

the sexualisation of children

over 4000 saves.. do you know how CSO’s operate?

we mean how would one go about proving this, when apart from pronouns type references there is no reference to sex

isn’t there? the intent that the young girl is ‘single’ and therefore ‘available’ for the boys is a fairly cut and dry statement. But legality aside, I think we can just be outraged at this sort of thing from a protective societal perspective. The cultural statement that women/girls are there for men/boys to possess if they are single does little to alleviate the idea of ownership of women. You should just be mad at things like this, it doesn’t need a thesis statement