diddly-squat said:

Arts said:

SCIENCE said:

we mean how would one go about proving this, when apart from pronouns type references there is no reference to sex

isn’t there? the intent that the young girl is ‘single’ and therefore ‘available’ for the boys is a fairly cut and dry statement. But legality aside, I think we can just be outraged at this sort of thing from a protective societal perspective. The cultural statement that women/girls are there for men/boys to possess if they are single does little to alleviate the idea of ownership of women. You should just be mad at things like this, it doesn’t need a thesis statement

The problem is that a lot people would look at that image and think “that’s so cute”…

and miss the sign altogether?