roughbarked said:

diddly-squat said:

Arts said:

isn’t there? the intent that the young girl is ‘single’ and therefore ‘available’ for the boys is a fairly cut and dry statement. But legality aside, I think we can just be outraged at this sort of thing from a protective societal perspective. The cultural statement that women/girls are there for men/boys to possess if they are single does little to alleviate the idea of ownership of women. You should just be mad at things like this, it doesn’t need a thesis statement

The problem is that a lot people would look at that image and think “that’s so cute”…

and miss the sign altogether?

No. They think the message is cute.