Arts said:
SCIENCE said:Arts said:
the sexualisation of children
over 4000 saves.. do you know how CSO’s operate?
we mean how would one go about proving this, when apart from pronouns type references there is no reference to sex
isn’t there? the intent that the young girl is ‘single’ and therefore ‘available’ for the boys is a fairly cut and dry statement. But legality aside, I think we can just be outraged at this sort of thing from a protective societal perspective. The cultural statement that women/girls are there for men/boys to possess if they are single does little to alleviate the idea of ownership of women. You should just be mad at things like this, it doesn’t need a thesis statement
This discussion reminded me of this song, written by some bloke in 1982: