SCIENCE said:

Bubblecar said:

Ian said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-11-12/secret-erin-patterson-evidence-remains-suppressed/107376964

In short:

In a partially redacted judgment published online, the Court of Appeal said there was a danger Patterson would face “unfair prejudice” if potential jurors knew about the evidence.

“While the evidence is nuanced and complex, it would be likely to attract very significant publicity with the potential to cause a real and substantial risk of prejudice to any future trial,” Justices Stephen McLeish, Lesley Taylor and Peter Kidd wrote.

For legal reasons, the ABC is unable to report details of what the evidence is but it certainly most amazingly interesting. So we won’t tell you anything more.

They’d better release it soon, there are umpteen books, films and mini-series waiting.

don’t worry just stay alive

The suppression order will lift if Patterson fails to apply for special leave to appeal to the High Court by November 27.

What would she expect to happen at an appeal
Oh yeah we fucked up, evidence be damned, you’re free to go and we’ve entered you into Master Chef Australia