Tau.Neutrino said:
Does Wikipedia have a category for Frozen Life ?
No.
Category for Frozen Life ?\?
Nup
Frozen Life bought back to life?
No
Wikipedia entry edit anyone ?
You can do this. T.N
> 13 Humans? If they have more than LD50 of alcohol in their body? If young enough? One of the lowest documented body temperatures from which someone with accidental hypothermia has survived is 13.0 °C in a near-drowning of a 7-year-old girl in Sweden. But in older cases even lower core temperatures probably occurred.
The scientific method is hypothesis – test. So a definitive test would be to take a sufficient number of newborn human babies, feed them increasing amounts of alcohol over the first two weeks of life, sufficient to induce alcoholic coma. Then freeze them as fast as possible while in a coma, such as by immersing them in ice-water. Holding that temperature for a time sufficient to drop the core temperature to zero (they will have already swallowed a thermometer). Then thaw them as fast as possible, using a microwave and near-scaldingly-hot water. Then see if they come back to life and check for permanent injury.
I don’t think an ethics committee would approve that. In fact, I’m darn sure they wouldn’t.
So, what’s the animal most similar to a human being that it could be tested on? https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/arh24-2/77-84.pdf “Animal models of many aspects of human alcoholism have been developed. In these models, which primarily use rodents such as mice and rats”.
Mouse babies are sold as food for pet snakes. Rhesus monkeys are used in primate research, such as effects of the Zika virus and other diseases. Off topic, but this is interesting “Caloric restriction improves health and survival of rhesus monkeys: Nature Communications 8, 14063. Open access.”
Let’s start with rats. Baby rats are too small to swallow a thermometer, and at birth they are much less developed than human babies. On the other hand, they grow up faster so a full two weeks of alcohol intake may be impossible.
The next question is, “what is a sufficient number?” The experiment can be stopped at the first completely successful recovery. If no successful revival then 20 individuals would suffice.
Success with rats would not necessarily translate to success with humans. Rats are smaller so can freeze and thaw more quickly. Faster rates of freeze-thaw mean smaller ice crystals which in turn implies lower cellular damage.