Date: 5/11/2018 11:27:37
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1299091
Subject: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

For numbers 575 to 581 see thread “ideal camera”.









Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 11:32:13
From: sibeen
ID: 1299092
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

There ya go, I’d never heard of the Bechdel test.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 11:32:58
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1299094
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

Don’t get 573.

Can you give us a hint?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 11:36:21
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1299096
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

sibeen said:


There ya go, I’d never heard of the Bechdel test.

The Bechdel test, Esselte found it for me. Thank you Esselte. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bechdel_test

Missing 572. Try again.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 11:43:05
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1299100
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

The Rev Dodgson said:


Don’t get 573.

Can you give us a hint?

Oh. The Met bureau has a tsunami detection system of deepwater buoys all around Australia except for the East Coast. Geologically, a tsunami has been observed high enough to flood over the top of Sydney’s north and south heads. That means there is no way we could know about any devastating tsunami approaching Eastern Australia, from Eden to the Sunshine Coast, except by its prior impact on Lord Howe Island. I sent an email to the Met Bureau about this lapse.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 11:44:43
From: Ian
ID: 1299101
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

#573

Victoria and Tasmania also have a history of tsunamis.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 11:46:51
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1299102
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

mollwollfumble said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Don’t get 573.

Can you give us a hint?

Oh. The Met bureau has a tsunami detection system of deepwater buoys all around Australia except for the East Coast. Geologically, a tsunami has been observed high enough to flood over the top of Sydney’s north and south heads. That means there is no way we could know about any devastating tsunami approaching Eastern Australia, from Eden to the Sunshine Coast, except by its prior impact on Lord Howe Island. I sent an email to the Met Bureau about this lapse.

Thanks.

But actually I meant 574.

(Your time wasn’t wasted, I didn’t get 573 really either :))

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 11:49:17
From: Ian
ID: 1299103
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

The Rev Dodgson said:


mollwollfumble said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Don’t get 573.

Can you give us a hint?

Oh. The Met bureau has a tsunami detection system of deepwater buoys all around Australia except for the East Coast. Geologically, a tsunami has been observed high enough to flood over the top of Sydney’s north and south heads. That means there is no way we could know about any devastating tsunami approaching Eastern Australia, from Eden to the Sunshine Coast, except by its prior impact on Lord Howe Island. I sent an email to the Met Bureau about this lapse.

Thanks.

But actually I meant 574.

(Your time wasn’t wasted, I didn’t get 573 really either :))

It’s a H2G2 rip.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 12:25:12
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1299122
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

The Rev Dodgson said:


mollwollfumble said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Don’t get 573.

Can you give us a hint?

Oh. The Met bureau has a tsunami detection system of deepwater buoys all around Australia except for the East Coast. Geologically, a tsunami has been observed high enough to flood over the top of Sydney’s north and south heads. That means there is no way we could know about any devastating tsunami approaching Eastern Australia, from Eden to the Sunshine Coast, except by its prior impact on Lord Howe Island. I sent an email to the Met Bureau about this lapse.

Thanks.

But actually I meant 574.

(Your time wasn’t wasted, I didn’t get 573 really either :))

Oh. Back to 573. All of eastern Australia sits adjacent to the Pacific Ring of Fire. It’s not exactly on the ring of fire, but that doesn’t stop us being devastated by tsunamis originating on one of the extremely seismically active two ridges north of New Zealand, or from Auckland. If on the Norfolk Island ridge then Norfolk Island would give an artificially low estimate of the tsunami height (because it’s a nodal point) leaving only lord Howe Island between the point of origin and east Coast Australia/

On 574. Not a great cartoon. Infinity looks flat and uninteresting. There are only about 1,000 individual stars visible in the sky at any one time, but it looks almost like an infinite number. A lot of people overestimate the number of stars visible to the naked eye by a factor of 1,000 or more.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 12:27:14
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1299124
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

Ian said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

mollwollfumble said:

Oh. The Met bureau has a tsunami detection system of deepwater buoys all around Australia except for the East Coast. Geologically, a tsunami has been observed high enough to flood over the top of Sydney’s north and south heads. That means there is no way we could know about any devastating tsunami approaching Eastern Australia, from Eden to the Sunshine Coast, except by its prior impact on Lord Howe Island. I sent an email to the Met Bureau about this lapse.

Thanks.

But actually I meant 574.

(Your time wasn’t wasted, I didn’t get 573 really either :))

It’s a H2G2 rip.

Yes. Flying into the interior of Magrathea.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 12:27:58
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1299125
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

Ian said:

#573

Victoria and Tasmania also have a history of tsunamis.

Thanks. I didn’t know that.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 12:34:47
From: AwesomeO
ID: 1299127
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

Re 586, when Bomber Harris was asking for (I think) four times as many bombers, and when resources were strained, Churchill replied, you could get the same effect by being four times as accurate.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 12:37:54
From: Ian
ID: 1299130
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

mollwollfumble said:


Ian said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Thanks.

But actually I meant 574.

(Your time wasn’t wasted, I didn’t get 573 really either :))

It’s a H2G2 rip.

Yes. Flying into the interior of Magrathea.

Yeah and.. The Total Perspective Vortex is allegedly the most horrible torture device to which a sentient being can be subjected.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 13:05:51
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1299134
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

573: I’m surprised there isn’t a detection system on the E coast; I thought there was.

Some time ago I saw a report claiming that there is geological evidence of a massive tsunami South of Sydney (just S of Wollongong I think).

574: I sort of get it. I think :)

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 14:04:23
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1299138
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

sibeen said:


There ya go, I’d never heard of the Bechdel test.

From TATE:
“ Female characters were portrayed as being involved in sex twice as often as male characters,”

How does that work?

50% of sex scenes in films are lesbian?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 14:06:03
From: sibeen
ID: 1299140
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

The Rev Dodgson said:


sibeen said:

There ya go, I’d never heard of the Bechdel test.

From TATE:
“ Female characters were portrayed as being involved in sex twice as often as male characters,”

How does that work?

50% of sex scenes in films are lesbian?

Stop jumping to conclusions. Perhaps 50% were solo efforts.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 14:10:08
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1299141
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

sibeen said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

sibeen said:

There ya go, I’d never heard of the Bechdel test.

From TATE:
“ Female characters were portrayed as being involved in sex twice as often as male characters,”

How does that work?

50% of sex scenes in films are lesbian?

Stop jumping to conclusions. Perhaps 50% were solo efforts.

Or maybe 100% threesomes with 2 wimmin.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 14:43:36
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1299150
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

AwesomeO said:


Re 586, when Bomber Harris was asking for (I think) four times as many bombers, and when resources were strained, Churchill replied, you could get the same effect by being four times as accurate.

Directly appropriate. :-)

Reply Quote

Date: 5/11/2018 14:48:00
From: Michael V
ID: 1299154
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

Are you going to put the others in here too? Or are to languish only in the camera thread.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/11/2018 10:33:37
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1299492
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

Michael V said:


Are you going to put the others in here too? Or are to languish only in the camera thread.







Reply Quote

Date: 6/11/2018 10:46:11
From: Michael V
ID: 1299497
Subject: re: Good Scientist Cartoon 570 to 586

Ta.

:)

Reply Quote