Date: 15/11/2018 16:56:38
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 1303663
Subject: Promising fusion reactor results in China

China’s ‘artificial sun’ reaches 100 million degrees Celsius marking milestone for nuclear fusion.

Chinese nuclear scientists have reached an important milestone in the global quest to harness energy from nuclear fusion, a process that occurs naturally in the sun.

Key points:
The “artificial sun” is designed to replicate the fusion process that occurs in the sun
Dr Matthew Hole said the achievement is significant for fusion science around the world
Fusion is seen as a solution for energy issues as it is clean, sustainable and powerful
The team of scientists from China’s Institute of Plasma Physics announced this week that plasma in their Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) — dubbed the “artificial sun” — reached a whopping 100 million degrees Celsius, temperature required to maintain a fusion reaction that produces more power than it takes to run.

More

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 17:12:29
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1303666
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

They could only maintain it for 10 seconds.

But,then, the Wright Brothers’ first flight was only 59 seconds.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 17:14:52
From: roughbarked
ID: 1303668
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

captain_spalding said:


They could only maintain it for 10 seconds.

But,then, the Wright Brothers’ first flight was only 59 seconds.

… using pedal power.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 17:18:20
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1303670
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

They could only maintain it for 10 seconds.

But,then, the Wright Brothers’ first flight was only 59 seconds.

… using pedal power.

I find it impressive that they not only built the aeroplane, but designed and built the engine that powered it.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 17:26:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 1303671
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

They could only maintain it for 10 seconds.

But,then, the Wright Brothers’ first flight was only 59 seconds.

… using pedal power.

I find it impressive that they not only built the aeroplane, but designed and built the engine that powered it.

They got the plans from Hargraves.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 18:22:37
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 1303677
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

They could only maintain it for 10 seconds.

But,then, the Wright Brothers’ first flight was only 59 seconds.

… using pedal power.

I find it impressive that they not only built the aeroplane, but designed and built the engine that powered it.

FWIW Richard Pearse from New Zealand did better & longer flights earlier than the Wright brothers.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 18:24:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 1303678
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

Spiny Norman said:


captain_spalding said:

roughbarked said:

… using pedal power.

I find it impressive that they not only built the aeroplane, but designed and built the engine that powered it.

FWIW Richard Pearse from New Zealand did better & longer flights earlier than the Wright brothers.

Indeed. The Wright brothers ran a bike business. They had source of materials and knowledge but it was what came from betwixt the Tasman, that helped them on theoir way.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 18:53:23
From: sibeen
ID: 1303700
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

Spiny Norman said:


captain_spalding said:

roughbarked said:

… using pedal power.

I find it impressive that they not only built the aeroplane, but designed and built the engine that powered it.

FWIW Richard Pearse from New Zealand did better & longer flights earlier than the Wright brothers.

You’re only saying that because you’re a bloody kiwi.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 18:54:00
From: roughbarked
ID: 1303702
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

sibeen said:


Spiny Norman said:

captain_spalding said:

I find it impressive that they not only built the aeroplane, but designed and built the engine that powered it.

FWIW Richard Pearse from New Zealand did better & longer flights earlier than the Wright brothers.

You’re only saying that because you’re a bloody kiwi.

Do your own research.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 19:07:31
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 1303721
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

sibeen said:


Spiny Norman said:

captain_spalding said:

I find it impressive that they not only built the aeroplane, but designed and built the engine that powered it.

FWIW Richard Pearse from New Zealand did better & longer flights earlier than the Wright brothers.

You’re only saying that because you’re a bloody kiwi.

Only half of me!

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 19:09:17
From: JudgeMental
ID: 1303724
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

Spiny Norman said:


sibeen said:

Spiny Norman said:

FWIW Richard Pearse from New Zealand did better & longer flights earlier than the Wright brothers.

You’re only saying that because you’re a bloody kiwi.

Only half of me!

that is quite a large bit then.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 21:23:49
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1303795
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

Spiny Norman said:


China’s ‘artificial sun’ reaches 100 million degrees Celsius marking milestone for nuclear fusion.

Chinese nuclear scientists have reached an important milestone in the global quest to harness energy from nuclear fusion, a process that occurs naturally in the sun.

Key points:
The “artificial sun” is designed to replicate the fusion process that occurs in the sun
Dr Matthew Hole said the achievement is significant for fusion science around the world
Fusion is seen as a solution for energy issues as it is clean, sustainable and powerful
The team of scientists from China’s Institute of Plasma Physics announced this week that plasma in their Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) — dubbed the “artificial sun” — reached a whopping 100 million degrees Celsius, temperature required to maintain a fusion reaction that produces more power than it takes to run.

More

100 million degrees is good. But is it good enough?

The temperature of the core of the Sun is only 15.7 million degrees.
The temperature at the centre of an H bomb is 100 million degrees.
JET, built in 1983, has reached 200 million degrees.
DEMO, with completed engineering design in Europe, will heat the plasma to 100 million degrees to start the reaction, which increases the temperature to 40,000 million degrees.

A problem with containing such temperatures is that they play merry hell with the material lining the interior of the device.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2018 21:27:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 1303796
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

mollwollfumble said:


Spiny Norman said:

China’s ‘artificial sun’ reaches 100 million degrees Celsius marking milestone for nuclear fusion.

Chinese nuclear scientists have reached an important milestone in the global quest to harness energy from nuclear fusion, a process that occurs naturally in the sun.

Key points:
The “artificial sun” is designed to replicate the fusion process that occurs in the sun
Dr Matthew Hole said the achievement is significant for fusion science around the world
Fusion is seen as a solution for energy issues as it is clean, sustainable and powerful
The team of scientists from China’s Institute of Plasma Physics announced this week that plasma in their Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) — dubbed the “artificial sun” — reached a whopping 100 million degrees Celsius, temperature required to maintain a fusion reaction that produces more power than it takes to run.

More

100 million degrees is good. But is it good enough?

The temperature of the core of the Sun is only 15.7 million degrees.
The temperature at the centre of an H bomb is 100 million degrees.
JET, built in 1983, has reached 200 million degrees.
DEMO, with completed engineering design in Europe, will heat the plasma to 100 million degrees to start the reaction, which increases the temperature to 40,000 million degrees.

A problem with containing such temperatures is that they play merry hell with the material lining the interior of the device.

and more besides.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2018 15:34:59
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1303997
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

I have been told only the west has this type of expertise. What’s gone wrong?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2018 15:35:52
From: sibeen
ID: 1303998
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

PermeateFree said:


I have been told only the west has this type of expertise. What’s gone wrong?

You’ve been listening to the wrong people.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2018 15:48:31
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1304006
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

PermeateFree said:


I have been told only the west has this type of expertise. What’s gone wrong?

The expertise progressed from Russia (where the Tokamak originated) to Europe, then finally to the USA (replacing its awful Stellarator), then to Japan, then to Korea, then to China.

Warning, devil’s advocate mode on.

The next step on this ‘round the world tour’ will be for the technology to progress from China to Russia.

Devil’s advocate node off.

More likely India.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2018 15:57:32
From: AwesomeO
ID: 1304011
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

mollwollfumble said:


PermeateFree said:

I have been told only the west has this type of expertise. What’s gone wrong?

The expertise progressed from Russia (where the Tokamak originated) to Europe, then finally to the USA (replacing its awful Stellarator), then to Japan, then to Korea, then to China.

Warning, devil’s advocate mode on.

The next step on this ‘round the world tour’ will be for the technology to progress from China to Russia.

Devil’s advocate node off.

More likely India.

Stellarator might be awful, I have no idea, but it is the coolest looking machine I have ever seen, it looks like a prop for a sci fi movie of steampunk technology.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2018 16:47:14
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1304019
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

sibeen said:


PermeateFree said:

I have been told only the west has this type of expertise. What’s gone wrong?

You’ve been listening to the wrong people.

Ho, yus, they can generate a contained fusion reaction, but they can’t clean a hotel room properly.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-11-16/luxury-hotels-in-china-forced-to-apologise-over-hygiene-scandal/10503980

(No, i’m not really picking on China. I’ve worked in restaurant kitchens, i know that there’s worse goes on than what we see in the video.)

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2018 22:47:01
From: wookiemeister
ID: 1305127
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

fusion power as we know it now was discovered in the later part of the 23rd century when the resonant graviton process allowed amplification of “gravity” thus creating an artificial singularity which provided the power needed for dimensional folding.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2018 04:11:20
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1305154
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

wookiemeister said:


fusion power as we know it now was discovered in the later part of the 23rd century when the resonant graviton process allowed amplification of “gravity” thus creating an artificial singularity which provided the power needed for dimensional folding.

fusion power as we know it now was discovered in the later part of the 23rd century during the beer glut. It had been realised in the 21st century that a wet foam provided the unique properties for damping the power of an H-bomb, but it took two more centuries before people were willing to sacrifice their beer for that purpose.

Filling the underground fusion reactor with beer.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2018 21:59:08
From: wookiemeister
ID: 1305547
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

mollwollfumble said:


wookiemeister said:

fusion power as we know it now was discovered in the later part of the 23rd century when the resonant graviton process allowed amplification of “gravity” thus creating an artificial singularity which provided the power needed for dimensional folding.

fusion power as we know it now was discovered in the later part of the 23rd century during the beer glut. It had been realised in the 21st century that a wet foam provided the unique properties for damping the power of an H-bomb, but it took two more centuries before people were willing to sacrifice their beer for that purpose.

Filling the underground fusion reactor with beer.



a cheaper fuel was thought to be hot tea

Reply Quote

Date: 26/09/2025 19:26:23
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2319052
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

America’s nightmare: China is moving at lightning speed to control the future
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
September 26, 2025 — 5.40pm

China is moving at lightning speed to secure a stranglehold over the industrial supply chain of nuclear fusion, aiming to leapfrog the US as technology advances from theoretical science to actual power for the grid.

The Communist Party has launched what amounts to a Manhattan Project to dominate the next stage of fusion, which promises to start sweeping away the existing energy order much sooner than is widely understood.

Beijing is replicating the same strategy it used to wipe out global rivals in solar panels, lithium batteries, critical minerals and electric vehicles.

“China’s rise in fusion poses an existential threat to US energy dominance,” says Will Regan, founder of the US start-up Pacific Fusion.

Regan says China has deployed upwards of $US10 billion to $US13 billion ($15.2 billion to $19.7 billion) since 2023 in a systematic attempt to capture the family of specialist industries that will underpin the rollout of fusion power plants at scale.

That figure is more than the rest of the world combined over the same period – probably by a large margin.

“Their facilities are so big you can literally see them from space,” says Bob Mumgaard, chief executive of Commonwealth Fusion Systems, the West’s frontrunner in commercial fusion.

“We are hearing reports that they are working 24 hours a day with interns sleeping in cots. This is a co-ordinated, state-organised intention to win the fusion race,” he said.

“This is a very high-stakes race worth trillions of dollars. China is positioned to win; the US isn’t,” he says.

Mumgaard says the Chinese have been pouring money on a massive scale into all the foundational structures of an active fusion industry.

“The US has nothing like this,” Mumgaard says. “Our fusion program looks like it did a decade ago. It’s fragmented, underfunded and ill-equipped and still focused on science.”

Mumgaard spoke last week at a shocking but sparsely attended session in Congress on the fusion race. The mood was in stark contrast to the heady triumphalism of the Pujiang Innovation Forum in Shanghai happening at much the same time.

Professor Zhang Jie, from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, says his country is fast developing a form of inertial laser fusion at a vast new facility in Sichuan that is 30 times more efficient than its US rival and promises to deliver baseload power at about $US25 a megawatt hour.

Such a level – if achieved – would obliterate all competition in global energy and establish China as the hegemonic electro-superpower.

Zhang, China’s “Dr Fusion”, says the technology will drastically change the international order and lead to an economic upheaval that surpasses all three industrial revolutions seen so far – mechanical, electrical and digital.

China’s leaders were stunned when the Lawrence Livermore laboratory in California announced in December 2022 that it had achieved ignition, generating more energy from fusing hydrogen isotopes than it put in to set off the reaction.

The lab has since repeated this eight times and reached an energy gain ratio of 4.1, as well as a “self-sustaining feedback loop” known as burning plasma.

Regan says Beijing instantly grasped the significance of the breakthrough and has since mobilised the full apparatus of the Chinese state to surpass it.

Beijing is replicating the same strategy it used to wipe out global rivals in solar panels, lithium batteries, critical minerals and electric vehicles.

“They are now close to operating a facility that could produce up to 10 times more yield: an enormous capability gap,” he says.

China is also going hell for leather on the more traditional fusion technology using ultra-strength magnets.

In January, its Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (East) contained burning plasma at temperatures above 100 million degrees for a record 17.7 minutes, catching up with the West in what some are already calling a Sputnik moment.

China now wants to produce the first fusion power for the grid by 2031, earlier than previously suggested by Chinese officials and sooner than almost anybody thought possible.

The larger point is that once China achieves this, it will be able to roll out plants at a pace the West cannot hope to match unless it too goes all out for fusion “rearmament”.

A recent study by a group of experts for MIT Technology Review magazine concluded that China already dominates three of the six critical industries that will underpin fusion at mass commercial scale – and is close to dominating another two.

These include thin-film processing needed to make superconducting magnetic coils – a spin-off from its solar sector – as well as specialist metal alloys able to resist radiation.

China has also stolen a march on power electronics thanks to its network of high-speed railways – 55 times larger than the US Acela network – and its massive expansion of renewable microgrids.

We are starting to glimpse the insidious price the US will pay for clinging too long to old fossil fuel tech while China bets the farm on new electro-tech.

There are today 53 private fusion companies worldwide and 85 per cent of the total funding raised so far has gone to US start-ups. Commonwealth’s $US3 billion venture is backed by Google, Nvidia and the big guns of US finance. It is already well advanced, with its experimental tokamak and plans to complete a commercial plant in Virginia by the early 2030s.

But there are limits to how fast private companies can move without a specialist ecosystem to back them up. That is yet to exist in America.

Chris Wright, the US energy secretary, has been on the airwaves proclaiming the gospel of fusion power within eight years.

“It has hit that tipping point where things are going to happen fast,” he has said.

But the Trump administration is doing precious little to ensure US companies will get there before a flock of Chinese rivals have already sewn up the global market.

The Americans badly need allies to plug the big holes in the supply chain, whether Japan for superconducting tapes or Britain for radioactive and rare H-3 tritium fuel. Hence the little-noticed fusion chapter in the US-UK nuclear deal agreed last week.

“The UK is the closest fit: they have facilities for tritium and blanket-breeding that are very significant, if we could get access,” Mumgaard says. “But when you look at India or some places in Europe, you wonder which side they are on.”

The beauty of fusion power is by now well understood. Plants cannot melt down. They are deemed safe enough to regulate like a hospital and can be built almost anywhere.

The technology does not emit carbon or produce long-lived radioactive waste. It needs little land and water. It can plug directly into the existing grid. It can deliver baseload power 24/7 or flex up and down. Tiny amounts of fuel can power the world endlessly.

There are still big hurdles. How do you stop neutrons from degrading the inner walls of the reactor? How do you control unstable plasma at 100 million degrees? The list of problems is long, but there has never before been such a concentrated effort to solve them.

The cardinal point is that advances in superconducting have suddenly made it possible to build a plant that is 40 times smaller than the old experimental reactors but which still generates as much power. It is this that has set off the global scramble for commercial fusion.

In a sense, the Chinese are doing us all a favour by forcing the pace. But a world in which the Communist Party’s totalitarian regime owns global energy is not going to be a pleasant one for Western democracies, if there are any left by then.

https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/america-s-nightmare-china-is-moving-at-lightning-speed-to-control-the-future-20250924-p5mxgc.html

Reply Quote

Date: 26/09/2025 19:43:51
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2319058
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

In only 30 years time we are going to have electricity coming out of our freckle.
The end of wind farms and solar monstrosities, we can reclaim our mountain tops and paddocks, and little Jimmy can sleep in his own little room again.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/09/2025 19:51:14
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2319060
Subject: re: Promising fusion reactor results in China

Witty Rejoinder said:

America’s nightmare: China is moving at lightning speed to control the future
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
September 26, 2025 — 5.40pm

China is moving at lightning speed to secure a stranglehold over the industrial supply chain of nuclear fusion, aiming to leapfrog the US as technology advances from theoretical science to actual power for the grid.

The Communist Party has launched what amounts to a Manhattan Project to dominate the next stage of fusion, which promises to start sweeping away the existing energy order much sooner than is widely understood.

Beijing is replicating the same strategy it used to wipe out global rivals in solar panels, lithium batteries, critical minerals and electric vehicles.

“China’s rise in fusion poses an existential threat to US energy dominance,” says Will Regan, founder of the US start-up Pacific Fusion.

Regan says China has deployed upwards of $US10 billion to $US13 billion ($15.2 billion to $19.7 billion) since 2023 in a systematic attempt to capture the family of specialist industries that will underpin the rollout of fusion power plants at scale.

That figure is more than the rest of the world combined over the same period – probably by a large margin.

“Their facilities are so big you can literally see them from space,” says Bob Mumgaard, chief executive of Commonwealth Fusion Systems, the West’s frontrunner in commercial fusion.

“We are hearing reports that they are working 24 hours a day with interns sleeping in cots. This is a co-ordinated, state-organised intention to win the fusion race,” he said.

“This is a very high-stakes race worth trillions of dollars. China is positioned to win; the US isn’t,” he says.

Mumgaard says the Chinese have been pouring money on a massive scale into all the foundational structures of an active fusion industry.

“The US has nothing like this,” Mumgaard says. “Our fusion program looks like it did a decade ago. It’s fragmented, underfunded and ill-equipped and still focused on science.”

Mumgaard spoke last week at a shocking but sparsely attended session in Congress on the fusion race. The mood was in stark contrast to the heady triumphalism of the Pujiang Innovation Forum in Shanghai happening at much the same time.

Professor Zhang Jie, from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, says his country is fast developing a form of inertial laser fusion at a vast new facility in Sichuan that is 30 times more efficient than its US rival and promises to deliver baseload power at about $US25 a megawatt hour.

Such a level – if achieved – would obliterate all competition in global energy and establish China as the hegemonic electro-superpower.

Zhang, China’s “Dr Fusion”, says the technology will drastically change the international order and lead to an economic upheaval that surpasses all three industrial revolutions seen so far – mechanical, electrical and digital.

China’s leaders were stunned when the Lawrence Livermore laboratory in California announced in December 2022 that it had achieved ignition, generating more energy from fusing hydrogen isotopes than it put in to set off the reaction.

The lab has since repeated this eight times and reached an energy gain ratio of 4.1, as well as a “self-sustaining feedback loop” known as burning plasma.

Regan says Beijing instantly grasped the significance of the breakthrough and has since mobilised the full apparatus of the Chinese state to surpass it.

Beijing is replicating the same strategy it used to wipe out global rivals in solar panels, lithium batteries, critical minerals and electric vehicles.

“They are now close to operating a facility that could produce up to 10 times more yield: an enormous capability gap,” he says.

China is also going hell for leather on the more traditional fusion technology using ultra-strength magnets.

In January, its Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (East) contained burning plasma at temperatures above 100 million degrees for a record 17.7 minutes, catching up with the West in what some are already calling a Sputnik moment.

China now wants to produce the first fusion power for the grid by 2031, earlier than previously suggested by Chinese officials and sooner than almost anybody thought possible.

The larger point is that once China achieves this, it will be able to roll out plants at a pace the West cannot hope to match unless it too goes all out for fusion “rearmament”.

A recent study by a group of experts for MIT Technology Review magazine concluded that China already dominates three of the six critical industries that will underpin fusion at mass commercial scale – and is close to dominating another two.

These include thin-film processing needed to make superconducting magnetic coils – a spin-off from its solar sector – as well as specialist metal alloys able to resist radiation.

China has also stolen a march on power electronics thanks to its network of high-speed railways – 55 times larger than the US Acela network – and its massive expansion of renewable microgrids.

We are starting to glimpse the insidious price the US will pay for clinging too long to old fossil fuel tech while China bets the farm on new electro-tech.

There are today 53 private fusion companies worldwide and 85 per cent of the total funding raised so far has gone to US start-ups. Commonwealth’s $US3 billion venture is backed by Google, Nvidia and the big guns of US finance. It is already well advanced, with its experimental tokamak and plans to complete a commercial plant in Virginia by the early 2030s.

But there are limits to how fast private companies can move without a specialist ecosystem to back them up. That is yet to exist in America.

Chris Wright, the US energy secretary, has been on the airwaves proclaiming the gospel of fusion power within eight years.

“It has hit that tipping point where things are going to happen fast,” he has said.

But the Trump administration is doing precious little to ensure US companies will get there before a flock of Chinese rivals have already sewn up the global market.

The Americans badly need allies to plug the big holes in the supply chain, whether Japan for superconducting tapes or Britain for radioactive and rare H-3 tritium fuel. Hence the little-noticed fusion chapter in the US-UK nuclear deal agreed last week.

“The UK is the closest fit: they have facilities for tritium and blanket-breeding that are very significant, if we could get access,” Mumgaard says. “But when you look at India or some places in Europe, you wonder which side they are on.”

The beauty of fusion power is by now well understood. Plants cannot melt down. They are deemed safe enough to regulate like a hospital and can be built almost anywhere.

The technology does not emit carbon or produce long-lived radioactive waste. It needs little land and water. It can plug directly into the existing grid. It can deliver baseload power 24/7 or flex up and down. Tiny amounts of fuel can power the world endlessly.

There are still big hurdles. How do you stop neutrons from degrading the inner walls of the reactor? How do you control unstable plasma at 100 million degrees? The list of problems is long, but there has never before been such a concentrated effort to solve them.

The cardinal point is that advances in superconducting have suddenly made it possible to build a plant that is 40 times smaller than the old experimental reactors but which still generates as much power. It is this that has set off the global scramble for commercial fusion.

In a sense, the Chinese are doing us all a favour by forcing the pace. But a world in which the Communist Party’s totalitarian regime owns global energy is not going to be a pleasant one for Western democracies, if there are any left by then.

https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/america-s-nightmare-china-is-moving-at-lightning-speed-to-control-the-future-20250924-p5mxgc.html

so a couple of GBU-57A/B MOP should fix this then

Reply Quote