Fearing that this got lost in chat.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/dec/30/children-leukaemia-mel-greaves-microbes-protection-against-disease
Fearing that this got lost in chat.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/dec/30/children-leukaemia-mel-greaves-microbes-protection-against-disease
sarahs mum said:
Fearing that this got lost in chat.https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/dec/30/children-leukaemia-mel-greaves-microbes-protection-against-disease
very interesting but it would be good to see the rebuttal.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
Fearing that this got lost in chat.https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/dec/30/children-leukaemia-mel-greaves-microbes-protection-against-disease
very interesting but it would be good to see the rebuttal.
Teenage Cancer Trust is not a reliably source. The real source is https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-018-0015-6
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
Fearing that this got lost in chat.https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/dec/30/children-leukaemia-mel-greaves-microbes-protection-against-disease
very interesting but it would be good to see the rebuttal.
Teenage Cancer Trust is not a reliably source. The real source is https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-018-0015-6
“Childhood acute leukaemia is the most common paediatric cancer in developed societies, accounting for one-third of all cases.”
Interesting
All it’s said in that Nature article is that this is a “hypothesis that would benefit from further scrutiny”. No scientific study has been carried out by the authors, nor has there been a comprehensive meta-analysis of previous scientific studies.