Date: 26/01/2019 14:08:59
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1336146
Subject: Art Stuff

Some art stuff

https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/kazimir-malevich-1561/five-ways-look-malevichs-black-square

Five ways to look at Malevich’s Black Square

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 15:18:37
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1336191
Subject: re: Art Stuff

More on Malevich

Why this Black Square painting is a big deal | The Mix
Malevich at Tate Modern
Why this Black Square is Art! Kazimir Malevich’s Suprematism | LittleArtTalks

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 15:19:17
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1336192
Subject: re: Art Stuff

Why these all-white paintings are in museums and mine aren’t

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 15:20:19
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1336194
Subject: re: Art Stuff

The Case for Conceptual Art

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 15:20:59
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1336195
Subject: re: Art Stuff

I Could Do That | The Art Assignment | PBS Digital Studios

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 15:21:41
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1336196
Subject: re: Art Stuff

Cases for Political Art | The Art Assignment | PBS Digital Studios

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 15:27:22
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1336201
Subject: re: Art Stuff

Kind of strange, but your opinion?

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 16:27:31
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1336230
Subject: re: Art Stuff

Tau.Neutrino said:


Why these all-white paintings are in museums and mine aren’t

Since we’re talking about black paintings and white paintings.

White Flag by Jasper Johns.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 16:45:10
From: dv
ID: 1336239
Subject: re: Art Stuff

mollwollfumble said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Why these all-white paintings are in museums and mine aren’t

Since we’re talking about black paintings and white paintings.

White Flag by Jasper Johns.


Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 16:47:03
From: Tamb
ID: 1336240
Subject: re: Art Stuff

dv said:


mollwollfumble said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

Why these all-white paintings are in museums and mine aren’t

Since we’re talking about black paintings and white paintings.

White Flag by Jasper Johns.



I wouldn’t have thought it would be called White Flag. More apt would be Dunny Wall.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 16:51:35
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1336241
Subject: re: Art Stuff

Tamb said:


dv said:

mollwollfumble said:

Since we’re talking about black paintings and white paintings.

White Flag by Jasper Johns.



I wouldn’t have thought it would be called White Flag. More apt would be Dunny Wall.

That’s hilarious.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 16:54:30
From: dv
ID: 1336242
Subject: re: Art Stuff

He couldn’t even do the Russian flag right … That’s more like the Dutch

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 18:32:55
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1336255
Subject: re: Art Stuff

There are many good art books. I have a copy of “the shock of the new”, which explains modern art but misses out postmodern art completely.

My favourite art book is “stolen, the gallery of missing masterpieces”. It’s a book about art that doesn’t exist. Art that once did exist but has now vanished. Great set of yarns, worth it both for the text, and for the photographs of masterpieces that can’t be seen anywhere else.

I was lucky enough to get to a Canberra exhibition of art from the Guggenheim, which took me step by step all the way from completely conventional representations through to Pollack. Cubism began from drawing townscapes, and then the brick-shapes became used for figure drawing as well. From representation to quick throw-away pieces, to dreams and fantasy colouring. From cubism to Kandinsky, from Kandinsky to Pollack. At each stage throwing something away, throwing away realism, then realistic colours, then describable geometric shapes, then throwing away the concept of line, delving briefly into the concept of texture.

Then with minimalism throwing away all sense of representation.

This coupled with occasional influences from commercial art: Lautrec, Warhol, Lichtenstein etc.

And disposing of canvases of even the minimalists in primativism.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 20:01:57
From: sarahs mum
ID: 1336273
Subject: re: Art Stuff

mollwollfumble said:


There are many good art books. I have a copy of “the shock of the new”, which explains modern art but misses out postmodern art completely.

My favourite art book is “stolen, the gallery of missing masterpieces”. It’s a book about art that doesn’t exist. Art that once did exist but has now vanished. Great set of yarns, worth it both for the text, and for the photographs of masterpieces that can’t be seen anywhere else.

I was lucky enough to get to a Canberra exhibition of art from the Guggenheim, which took me step by step all the way from completely conventional representations through to Pollack. Cubism began from drawing townscapes, and then the brick-shapes became used for figure drawing as well. From representation to quick throw-away pieces, to dreams and fantasy colouring. From cubism to Kandinsky, from Kandinsky to Pollack. At each stage throwing something away, throwing away realism, then realistic colours, then describable geometric shapes, then throwing away the concept of line, delving briefly into the concept of texture.

Then with minimalism throwing away all sense of representation.

This coupled with occasional influences from commercial art: Lautrec, Warhol, Lichtenstein etc.

And disposing of canvases of even the minimalists in primativism.


I also have a copy of Stolen.

Why Do the Eyes in Some Paintings Follow You Around the Room?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSHUpgKWAao

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2019 20:03:34
From: Neophyte
ID: 1336274
Subject: re: Art Stuff

sarahs mum said:


mollwollfumble said:

There are many good art books. I have a copy of “the shock of the new”, which explains modern art but misses out postmodern art completely.

My favourite art book is “stolen, the gallery of missing masterpieces”. It’s a book about art that doesn’t exist. Art that once did exist but has now vanished. Great set of yarns, worth it both for the text, and for the photographs of masterpieces that can’t be seen anywhere else.

I was lucky enough to get to a Canberra exhibition of art from the Guggenheim, which took me step by step all the way from completely conventional representations through to Pollack. Cubism began from drawing townscapes, and then the brick-shapes became used for figure drawing as well. From representation to quick throw-away pieces, to dreams and fantasy colouring. From cubism to Kandinsky, from Kandinsky to Pollack. At each stage throwing something away, throwing away realism, then realistic colours, then describable geometric shapes, then throwing away the concept of line, delving briefly into the concept of texture.

Then with minimalism throwing away all sense of representation.

This coupled with occasional influences from commercial art: Lautrec, Warhol, Lichtenstein etc.

And disposing of canvases of even the minimalists in primativism.


I also have a copy of Stolen.

Why Do the Eyes in Some Paintings Follow You Around the Room?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSHUpgKWAao

Nay, Ms Mum, this is the one you want

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wejNjdPndLI

Reply Quote