> if the government is using ‘tokens’ it creates out of thin air as money with no intrinsic value
Cash already has no intrinsic value. Its value only relies on universal acceptance.
transition said:
>A cashless society seems the way of the future.
I wouldn’t like to see that
A bit like a paperless society. I can bemoan the loss of good non-fiction books all I like, but that doesn’t mean that I will actually read one. Diversity of options seems most satisfactory right now.
Rule 303 said:
There’s plenty of countries that are effectively cashless and unregulated already – They transfer mobile phone pre-paid credit dollars to each other.
There are? Checks web. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cashless_society#Amount_of_cash_in_circulation
I’m not sure what is the best way to measure cashless society. eg. in the following table, I don’t know if that is percent by number of transactions or percent by value transferred.
In Singapore, 61% of payments are cashless.
In Sweden, 59%
In Australia, 35%
In Japan, 14%
In South Africa, 6%
In Indonesia, 0%
There seem to be five definitions of “money”, definitions that vary a bit from country to country, These five definitions are denoted M0, M1, M2, M3 and M4.
Definition of M0, M1, M2, M3, M4. Different measures of money supply.
M0 = coins and notes in circulation
M1 = also called “narrow money”, is M0 + other money equivalents that are easily convertible into cash.
M2 = M1 plus short-term time deposits in banks and 24-hour money market funds.
M3 = M2 plus longer-term time deposits and money market funds with more than 24-hour maturity.
M4 = M3 plus other deposits.
The term “broad money” is used to describe M2, M3 or M4, depending on country.