Date: 7/03/2019 20:16:44
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1356730
Subject: New Evidence for the Strange Geometry of Thought

New Evidence for the Strange Geometry of Thought

In 2014, the Swedish philosopher and cognitive scientist Peter Gärdenfors went to Krakow, Poland, for a conference on the mind. He was to lecture at Jagiellonian University, courtesy of the Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, on his theory of conceptual, or “cognitive,” spaces. Gärdenfors had been working on his idea of cognitive spaces, which explain how our brains represent concepts and objects, for decades. In his book Conceptual Spaces, from 2000, he wrote, “It has long been a common prejudice in cognitive science that the brain is either a Turing machine working with symbols or a connectionist system using neural networks.” In Krakow, Gärdenfors pushed against that prejudice. In his talk, “The Geometry of Thinking,” he suggested that humans are able to do things that today’s powerful computers can’t do—like learn language quickly and generalize from particulars with ease (to see, in other words, without much training, that lions and tigers are four-legged felines)—because we, unlike our computers, represent information in geometrical space.

more…

Reply Quote

Date: 7/03/2019 21:13:22
From: transition
ID: 1356753
Subject: re: New Evidence for the Strange Geometry of Thought

read that

Reply Quote

Date: 7/03/2019 21:21:20
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1356754
Subject: re: New Evidence for the Strange Geometry of Thought

The same or a similar process would be used to model 3D space in dreams.

Reply Quote

Date: 7/03/2019 21:23:15
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1356755
Subject: re: New Evidence for the Strange Geometry of Thought

Tau.Neutrino said:


The same or a similar process would be used to model 3D space in dreams.

There would be a bit of processing involved while floating above the ground in dreams.

Reply Quote

Date: 7/03/2019 21:29:16
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1356756
Subject: re: New Evidence for the Strange Geometry of Thought

Tau.Neutrino said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

The same or a similar process would be used to model 3D space in dreams.

There would be a bit of processing involved while floating above the ground in dreams.

Floating dreams occur in a geometric space, inside a building, outside in some environment.

People also can have abstract floating dreams like floating in an elevator while its descending.

Its like the brain is playing around with real space and conceptual space and blending the two together.

Reply Quote

Date: 7/03/2019 21:36:26
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1356757
Subject: re: New Evidence for the Strange Geometry of Thought

Floating dreams occur in a “conceptual” geometric space.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/03/2019 08:31:26
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1356849
Subject: re: New Evidence for the Strange Geometry of Thought

> In his talk, “The Geometry of Thinking,” he suggested that humans are able to do things that today’s powerful computers can’t do—like learn language quickly and generalize from particulars with ease (to see, in other words, without much training, that lions and tigers are four-legged felines)—because we, unlike our computers, represent information in geometrical space.

A heck of a lot of the human mind is devoted to visual processing.

It ought to be easy to do that with software, but i don’t know anyone who has. I’ve been tempted to write software to do that.

Reply Quote