Fun election drinking game: every time ScoMo is still Prime Minister, do a shot.
Fun election drinking game: every time ScoMo is still Prime Minister, do a shot.
dv said:
Fun election drinking game: every time ScoMo is still Prime Minister, do a shot.
Huh? At what interval?
Finally. THE thread.
party_pants said:
dv said:
Fun election drinking game: every time ScoMo is still Prime Minister, do a shot.
Huh? At what interval?
A teetotaller version would be every time Bob Katter is not elected.
https://votecompass.abc.net.au/
Tau.Neutrino said:
https://votecompass.abc.net.au/
Vote Compass is a tool developed by political scientists for exploring how your views align with those of the candidates
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
https://votecompass.abc.net.au/
Vote Compass is a tool developed by political scientists for exploring how your views align with those of the candidates
It’s a joke site.
Tau.Neutrino said:
https://votecompass.abc.net.au/
I did it yesterday and of course it plonked me more or less in the middle because it asked a lot of questions I thought were irrelevant or minor – so I answered neutrally to a lot of the questions. It also seemed to think I was more socially conservative than the ALP, which is not really true.
party_pants said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
https://votecompass.abc.net.au/
I did it yesterday and of course it plonked me more or less in the middle because it asked a lot of questions I thought were irrelevant or minor – so I answered neutrally to a lot of the questions. It also seemed to think I was more socially conservative than the ALP, which is not really true.
Yes, and how come the parties are represented by a single point?
Surely they should have a rounded shape with fuzzy edges.
The Rev Dodgson said:
party_pants said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
https://votecompass.abc.net.au/
I did it yesterday and of course it plonked me more or less in the middle because it asked a lot of questions I thought were irrelevant or minor – so I answered neutrally to a lot of the questions. It also seemed to think I was more socially conservative than the ALP, which is not really true.
Yes, and how come the parties are represented by a single point?
Surely they should have a rounded shape with fuzzy edges.
Yes, I was thinking that, maybe they could split the major parties into their factions and post where those factions lie. But I guess they have are going on the official party manifesto statements (or similar – we don’t really do manifestos as such in Australia).
party_pants said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
party_pants said:I did it yesterday and of course it plonked me more or less in the middle because it asked a lot of questions I thought were irrelevant or minor – so I answered neutrally to a lot of the questions. It also seemed to think I was more socially conservative than the ALP, which is not really true.
Yes, and how come the parties are represented by a single point?
Surely they should have a rounded shape with fuzzy edges.
Yes, I was thinking that, maybe they could split the major parties into their factions and post where those factions lie. But I guess they have are going on the official party manifesto statements (or similar – we don’t really do manifestos as such in Australia).
-have
bad edit.
I wish there were more Wilkies.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/apr/12/tony-abbott-peter-dutton-who-will-lose-their-seat-in-election-2019?fbclid=IwAR1ykxNoKAbF1YfTXvU7KFPRpbOl0SyK94OU36BX-FGAcEVt-FrurSlJD7E
—-
Frydenberg DV?
first dog predicts a vast swing against him?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/apr/12/tony-abbott-peter-dutton-who-will-lose-their-seat-in-election-2019?fbclid=IwAR1ykxNoKAbF1YfTXvU7KFPRpbOl0SyK94OU36BX-FGAcEVt-FrurSlJD7E
There’s no way Kooyong will go ALP.
So it is a matter of whether Oliver Yates (or perhaps someone else) can do a Phelps.
sibeen said:
CandidatesSarwar Hasan (United Australia)
Bill Shorten (Labor)
Christine Stow (Liberal)Decisions, decisions.
There’s still another 10 days for candidates to nominate.
If you’re interested.
dv said:
sibeen said:
CandidatesSarwar Hasan (United Australia)
Bill Shorten (Labor)
Christine Stow (Liberal)Decisions, decisions.
There’s still another 10 days for candidates to nominate.
If you’re interested.
You missed our discussion this morning on forming the SSSF party.
dv said:
sibeen said:
CandidatesSarwar Hasan (United Australia)
Bill Shorten (Labor)
Christine Stow (Liberal)Decisions, decisions.
There’s still another 10 days for candidates to nominate.
If you’re interested.
But the UAP already has a candidate running.
confused from Essendon
There will be 151 divisions (and hence 151 MPs to be elected) in the upcoming election.
This is due to an unusual and rare mathematical situation that has led to the ACT qualifying for 3 seats. The new ACT division is called Bean.
The Division of Port Adelaide has been abolished. There’s a new division in Victoria called Fraser.
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
CandidatesSarwar Hasan (United Australia)
Bill Shorten (Labor)
Christine Stow (Liberal)Decisions, decisions.
There’s still another 10 days for candidates to nominate.
If you’re interested.
But the UAP already has a candidate running.
confused from Essendon
They’ve been running campaign ads on the radio for 3 months.
dv said:
The Division of Port Adelaide has been abolished. There’s a new division in Victoria called Fraser.
Which ironically will be a very safe Labor seat :)
sibeen said:
But the UAP already has a candidate running.
confused from Essendon
I didn’t say they have to wait another 10 days, I said there’s another 10 days for candidates to nominate.
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
dv said:There’s still another 10 days for candidates to nominate.
If you’re interested.
But the UAP already has a candidate running.
confused from Essendon
They’ve been running campaign ads on the radio for 3 months.
Not on RRR they haven’t. I wish they would, just the one, the outcry would be fun.
RRR has a very left/green listening demographic.
dv said:
There will be 151 divisions (and hence 151 MPs to be elected) in the upcoming election.This is due to an unusual and rare mathematical situation that has led to the ACT qualifying for 3 seats. The new ACT division is called Bean.
The Division of Port Adelaide has been abolished. There’s a new division in Victoria called Fraser.
>>The new ACT division is called Bean. <<
Go on, you made that name up!
sibeen said:
party_pants said:
sibeen said:But the UAP already has a candidate running.
confused from Essendon
They’ve been running campaign ads on the radio for 3 months.
Not on RRR they haven’t. I wish they would, just the one, the outcry would be fun.
RRR has a very left/green listening demographic.
meh, stick your boutique radio station up your RRRs.
buffy said:
dv said:
There will be 151 divisions (and hence 151 MPs to be elected) in the upcoming election.This is due to an unusual and rare mathematical situation that has led to the ACT qualifying for 3 seats. The new ACT division is called Bean.
The Division of Port Adelaide has been abolished. There’s a new division in Victoria called Fraser.
>>The new ACT division is called Bean. <<
Go on, you made that name up!
dv said:
tough sub
dv said:
dv said:
tough sub
I got it. I think it’s clever.
dv said:
dv said:
tough sub
I can’t remember who the egg is.
dv said:
dv said:
tough sub
i didn’t want to encourage you by laughing.
dv said:
sibeen said:
CandidatesSarwar Hasan (United Australia)
Bill Shorten (Labor)
Christine Stow (Liberal)Decisions, decisions.
There’s still another 10 days for candidates to nominate.
If you’re interested.
Ta.
The election at this point is not looking close but I suppose a lot can happen in 5 weeks.
JudgeMental said:
i didn’t want to encourage you by laughing.
wise
buffy said:
dv said:
There will be 151 divisions (and hence 151 MPs to be elected) in the upcoming election.This is due to an unusual and rare mathematical situation that has led to the ACT qualifying for 3 seats. The new ACT division is called Bean.
The Division of Port Adelaide has been abolished. There’s a new division in Victoria called Fraser.
>>The new ACT division is called Bean. <<
Go on, you made that name up!
I just checked, and it seems he didn’t.
But I presume it will be Mr Bean, when given its full title.
dv said:
The election at this point is not looking close but I suppose a lot can happen in 5 weeks.
Which is why I mentioned Tampa the other evening.
sibeen said:
dv said:
The election at this point is not looking close but I suppose a lot can happen in 5 weeks.
Which is why I mentioned Tampa the other evening.
I’m sure that trick can’t work a fifth time.
sibeen said:
dv said:
The election at this point is not looking close but I suppose a lot can happen in 5 weeks.
Which is why I mentioned Tampa the other evening.
Could Assange be a reverse Tampa?
What about Christchurch last month.
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
The election at this point is not looking close but I suppose a lot can happen in 5 weeks.
Which is why I mentioned Tampa the other evening.
Could Assange be a reverse Tampa?
What about Christchurch last month.
I’m in the bubble … it’s hard for me to assess. It’s hard to see the Assange news changing the way many people in Australia vote, and any impact from Christchurch would already be in the polls.
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
dv said:
tough sub
I can’t remember who the egg is.
Fraser Anning
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
dv said:tough sub
I can’t remember who the egg is.
Fraser Anning
I get it now.
:)
The Rev Dodgson said:
buffy said:
dv said:
There will be 151 divisions (and hence 151 MPs to be elected) in the upcoming election.This is due to an unusual and rare mathematical situation that has led to the ACT qualifying for 3 seats. The new ACT division is called Bean.
The Division of Port Adelaide has been abolished. There’s a new division in Victoria called Fraser.
>>The new ACT division is called Bean. <<
Go on, you made that name up!
I just checked, and it seems he didn’t.
But I presume it will be Mr Bean, when given its full title.
… and with a little further research I learn that it was Charles Bean, and also that Monash was Jewish with German parents.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-14/federal-election-2019-day-four-sausages-and-onions/11001686
LOL
Michael V said:
![]()
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-14/federal-election-2019-day-four-sausages-and-onions/11001686
LOL
TMI
sings
“Clive’s a bloody liar,
Clive’s a bloody thief’
Australia’s not going to take it,
Any more.”
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-15/clive-palmer-offers-to-pay-back-queensland-nickel-workers/11003030
Michael V said:
sings“Clive’s a bloody liar,
Clive’s a bloody thief’
Australia’s not going to take it,
Any more.”https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-15/clive-palmer-offers-to-pay-back-queensland-nickel-workers/11003030
Yeah it’s sounds like the old “I promise to think about thinking about doing the right thing after the election, and no the idea had not occurred to me earlier”.
Clive makes a lot of promises but seems unsure on how to actually deliver. Much like his businesses, really.
But what makes me laugh is the ads where he and his candidates say “fifty thousand million dollars”.
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
sings“Clive’s a bloody liar,
Clive’s a bloody thief’
Australia’s not going to take it,
Any more.”https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-15/clive-palmer-offers-to-pay-back-queensland-nickel-workers/11003030
Yeah it’s sounds like the old “I promise to think about thinking about doing the right thing after the election, and no the idea had not occurred to me earlier”.
I would be quite amusing if Dee Synder ran against Clive Palmer, he obviously can’t as he isn’t an Australian citizen perhaps doing ads for someone against Clive Palmer.
“I wrote this song and didn’t give this fat bastard permission to use it, vote for the party that gives out free perms to hair farmers”
Cymek said:
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
sings“Clive’s a bloody liar,
Clive’s a bloody thief’
Australia’s not going to take it,
Any more.”https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-15/clive-palmer-offers-to-pay-back-queensland-nickel-workers/11003030
Yeah it’s sounds like the old “I promise to think about thinking about doing the right thing after the election, and no the idea had not occurred to me earlier”.
I would be quite amusing if Dee Synder ran against Clive Palmer, he obviously can’t as he isn’t an Australian citizen perhaps doing ads for someone against Clive Palmer.
“I wrote this song and didn’t give this fat bastard permission to use it, vote for the party that gives out free perms to hair farmers”
That would be Federal hairesy.
Tamb said:
Cymek said:
party_pants said:Yeah it’s sounds like the old “I promise to think about thinking about doing the right thing after the election, and no the idea had not occurred to me earlier”.
I would be quite amusing if Dee Synder ran against Clive Palmer, he obviously can’t as he isn’t an Australian citizen perhaps doing ads for someone against Clive Palmer.
“I wrote this song and didn’t give this fat bastard permission to use it, vote for the party that gives out free perms to hair farmers”
That would be Federal hairesy.
Groan
Cymek said:
Tamb said:
Cymek said:I would be quite amusing if Dee Synder ran against Clive Palmer, he obviously can’t as he isn’t an Australian citizen perhaps doing ads for someone against Clive Palmer.
“I wrote this song and didn’t give this fat bastard permission to use it, vote for the party that gives out free perms to hair farmers”
That would be Federal hairesy.
Groan
I duz wot I can.
Tamb said:
Cymek said:
Tamb said:That would be Federal hairesy.
Groan
I duz wot I can.
You’d be remiss to not make a pun even if it was terrible, I try not to
Cymek said:
Tamb said:
Cymek said:Groan
I duz wot I can.
You’d be remiss to not make a pun even if it was terrible, I try not to
Yes. It would be a remission of guilt.
This is similar to VoteCompass but has more detailed results including better graphs:
https://www.theage.com.au/federal-election-2019/introducing-smartvote-australia-take-the-test-ahead-of-the-federal-election-20190429-p51ibu.html
Now… who to put last?
Divine Angel said:
Now… who to put last?
Christ :)
Divine Angel said:
Now… who to put last?
Anning last
reddy
hopkins
howarth
kennedy
mulholland
ChrispenEvan said:
Divine Angel said:
Now… who to put last?
Anning last
reddy
hopkins
howarth
kennedy
mulholland
My electorate is listed as a “key seat”. We swing more than a playground flying fox in the wind.
Divine Angel said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Divine Angel said:
Now… who to put last?
Anning last
reddy
hopkins
howarth
kennedy
mulhollandMy electorate is listed as a “key seat”. We swing more than a playground flying fox in the wind.
vote early and vote often then.
Divine Angel said:
Now… who to put last?
We’ve got 8 candidates, of which 4 are worthy of last spot.
ROFL.
SWMBO has just told me she voted today but was very confused. In our electorate there’s four on the ballot. Lib, Lab, Green and UAP. What really threw her was that the bloke who handed her the UAP was a quite dark Indian gent. She said it took her a few double takes to work out what was what.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/07/the-fact-the-liberal-launch-wont-be-about-the-liberals-exposes-the-partys-emptiness
sibeen said:
ROFL.SWMBO has just told me she voted today but was very confused. In our electorate there’s four on the ballot. Lib, Lab, Green and UAP. What really threw her was that the bloke who handed her the UAP was a quite dark Indian gent. She said it took her a few double takes to work out what was what.
No Fraser Anning’s National Socialist Party in your area?
We’ve got 8. ALP, Greens. Liberal, PHON, Clive Plamers Fatsos, Fraser Annings, Western Australia Party, and Australian Christians.
Hard to know which to put last. I normally put the christians party last. But I might have to change that.
sibeen said:
ROFL.SWMBO has just told me she voted today but was very confused. In our electorate there’s four on the ballot. Lib, Lab, Green and UAP. What really threw her was that the bloke who handed her the UAP was a quite dark Indian gent. She said it took her a few double takes to work out what was what.
I’ve been thinking up an election slogan:
“Liberal isn’t, Labor isn’t. Greens aren’t.”
Liberals are the most secretive, regimented, group in Australia. It treats its politicians much worse than negro slaves were ever treated.
Labor lost every connection to the working classes more than 20 years ago.
Greens are doing their best to stop natural forest growth and plankton growth. They’re luddites with a research budget.
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
ROFL.SWMBO has just told me she voted today but was very confused. In our electorate there’s four on the ballot. Lib, Lab, Green and UAP. What really threw her was that the bloke who handed her the UAP was a quite dark Indian gent. She said it took her a few double takes to work out what was what.
No Fraser Anning’s National Socialist Party in your area?
We’ve got 8. ALP, Greens. Liberal, PHON, Clive Plamers Fatsos, Fraser Annings, Western Australia Party, and Australian Christians.
Hard to know which to put last. I normally put the christians party last. But I might have to change that.
My Senate BTL ticket is going to be a right fucker to decide. Who is going to get the coveted spot? There’s many that try but the vast majority fail. Who is going to be the real fucktard in this year’s election and get sibeen’s coveted raspberry for being last on his ticket?
mollwollfumble said:
Liberals are the most secretive, regimented, group in Australia. It treats its politicians much worse than negro slaves were ever treated.
Christos.
sibeen said:
mollwollfumble said:Liberals are the most secretive, regimented, group in Australia. It treats its politicians much worse than negro slaves were ever treated.
Christos.
Welcome to the forum. Moll likes to make outrageous statements but then fails to respond to any replies.
mollwollfumble said:
sibeen said:
ROFL.SWMBO has just told me she voted today but was very confused. In our electorate there’s four on the ballot. Lib, Lab, Green and UAP. What really threw her was that the bloke who handed her the UAP was a quite dark Indian gent. She said it took her a few double takes to work out what was what.
I’ve been thinking up an election slogan:
“Liberal isn’t, Labor isn’t. Greens aren’t.”
Liberals are the most secretive, regimented, group in Australia. It treats its politicians much worse than negro slaves were ever treated.
Labor lost every connection to the working classes more than 20 years ago.
Greens are doing their best to stop natural forest growth and plankton growth. They’re luddites with a research budget.
I think I know more Greens than most. And I know the Tassie Green is a different animal to some other Greens. But most of the local Greens are female and over 60s.
I was thinking tonight that I do know two militant vegans. Female. 50s. One Masters and one PhD. Both will cite sources ad infinitum. One of them grew up on a reasonably intensive farm. and they would definitely be voting Green. I don’t think you can value the Green commuity by them tho.
Well, I just found who goes last on the senate vote.
mollwollfumble said:
sibeen said:
ROFL.SWMBO has just told me she voted today but was very confused. In our electorate there’s four on the ballot. Lib, Lab, Green and UAP. What really threw her was that the bloke who handed her the UAP was a quite dark Indian gent. She said it took her a few double takes to work out what was what.
I’ve been thinking up an election slogan:
“Liberal isn’t, Labor isn’t. Greens aren’t.”
Liberals are the most secretive, regimented, group in Australia. It treats its politicians much worse than negro slaves were ever treated.
Labor lost every connection to the working classes more than 20 years ago.
Greens are doing their best to stop natural forest growth and plankton growth. They’re luddites with a research budget.
You do come out with some utter crap at times.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:
mollwollfumble said:Liberals are the most secretive, regimented, group in Australia. It treats its politicians much worse than negro slaves were ever treated.
Christos.
Welcome to the forum. Moll likes to make outrageous statements but then fails to respond to any replies.
Damn
Sucked in.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:Christos.
Welcome to the forum. Moll likes to make outrageous statements but then fails to respond to any replies.
Damn
Sucked in.
good to see that other see Moll in the same light I do. and it isn’t a good one. thank fuck he doesn’t work as a “scientist” any more.
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Welcome to the forum. Moll likes to make outrageous statements but then fails to respond to any replies.
Damn
Sucked in.
good to see that other see Moll in the same light I do. and it isn’t a good one. thank fuck he doesn’t work as a “scientist” any more.
I think that’s way over the top.
1) He does respond sometimes.
2) Even if he doesn’t, provocative statements are good.
OK, my notes on the Victorian Senate Ballot paper candidates. Not in any order at the moment:
The Great Australian Party – right wing nutters
Yellow Vest Australia – anti muslim
Health Australia Party – anti vax
Australian Conservatives – Cory Bernadi + Family first
FRASER ANNING’S CONSERVATIVE NATIONAL PARTY – completely batshit
Sustainable Australia – anti immigration
Australian Labor Party – left wing nutters
Rise Up Australia Party – right wing nutters
The Greens (VIC) – see ALP
Animal Justice Party – probably vegan
Australian Workers Party – left wing ALP
VOTEFLUX.ORG | Upgrade Democracy! – vote for the death penalty
Pirate Party – completely rational
Pauline Hanson’s One Nation – I used to own a chip shop
Labour DLP – Catholic ALP
Secular Party of Australia – probably atheist
Liberal Democrats – potato heads natural party
Independents For Climate Action Now – independents who are in a party, are they on drugs
Australian Democrats – they’re still a thing?
Citizens Electoral Council – not in any way sane
Help End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party – no idea what these people want
Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party – lock up everybody
Climate Action! Immigration Action! Accountable Politicians! – they love colons
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers – guns, guns, guns
United Australia Party – Fat Clive + crnies
Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group) – I find it difficult to believe Fred is still alive.
The Small Business Party – right wing liberal
Socialist Equality Party – commies
Republican Party of Australia – god save the queen
Liberal – right wing nutters
I haven’t looked at the Senate ticket yet.
I’m going to have trouble finding 6 parties above the line that deserve a vote.
Way more choice than i had, struggled to get to 12…
Climate Action! Immigration Action! Accountable Politicians!
Cool, are they going to triple immigration so we can finally get a proper number of people on this empty continent?
sibeen said:
OK, my notes on the Victorian Senate Ballot paper candidates. Not in any order at the moment:The Great Australian Party – right wing nutters
Yellow Vest Australia – anti muslim
Health Australia Party – anti vax
Australian Conservatives – Cory Bernadi + Family first
FRASER ANNING’S CONSERVATIVE NATIONAL PARTY – completely batshit
Sustainable Australia – anti immigration
Australian Labor Party – left wing nutters
Rise Up Australia Party – right wing nutters
The Greens (VIC) – see ALP
Animal Justice Party – probably vegan
Australian Workers Party – left wing ALP
VOTEFLUX.ORG | Upgrade Democracy! – vote for the death penalty
Pirate Party – completely rational
Pauline Hanson’s One Nation – I used to own a chip shop
Labour DLP – Catholic ALP
Secular Party of Australia – probably atheist
Liberal Democrats – potato heads natural party
Independents For Climate Action Now – independents who are in a party, are they on drugs
Australian Democrats – they’re still a thing?
Citizens Electoral Council – not in any way sane
Help End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party – no idea what these people want
Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party – lock up everybody
Climate Action! Immigration Action! Accountable Politicians! – they love colons
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers – guns, guns, guns
United Australia Party – Fat Clive + crnies
Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group) – I find it difficult to believe Fred is still alive.
The Small Business Party – right wing liberal
Socialist Equality Party – commies
Republican Party of Australia – god save the queen
Liberal – right wing nutters
LOL
Can I pinch that?
dv said:
Climate Action! Immigration Action! Accountable Politicians!Cool, are they going to triple immigration so we can finally get a proper number of people on this empty continent?
No.
Rule 303 said:
sibeen said:
OK, my notes on the Victorian Senate Ballot paper candidates. Not in any order at the moment:The Great Australian Party – right wing nutters
Yellow Vest Australia – anti muslim
Health Australia Party – anti vax
Australian Conservatives – Cory Bernadi + Family first
FRASER ANNING’S CONSERVATIVE NATIONAL PARTY – completely batshit
Sustainable Australia – anti immigration
Australian Labor Party – left wing nutters
Rise Up Australia Party – right wing nutters
The Greens (VIC) – see ALP
Animal Justice Party – probably vegan
Australian Workers Party – left wing ALP
VOTEFLUX.ORG | Upgrade Democracy! – vote for the death penalty
Pirate Party – completely rational
Pauline Hanson’s One Nation – I used to own a chip shop
Labour DLP – Catholic ALP
Secular Party of Australia – probably atheist
Liberal Democrats – potato heads natural party
Independents For Climate Action Now – independents who are in a party, are they on drugs
Australian Democrats – they’re still a thing?
Citizens Electoral Council – not in any way sane
Help End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party – no idea what these people want
Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party – lock up everybody
Climate Action! Immigration Action! Accountable Politicians! – they love colons
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers – guns, guns, guns
United Australia Party – Fat Clive + crnies
Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group) – I find it difficult to believe Fred is still alive.
The Small Business Party – right wing liberal
Socialist Equality Party – commies
Republican Party of Australia – god save the queen
Liberal – right wing nutters
LOL
Can I pinch that?
Go for you life :)
The major pollsters in Australia have a good record in federal elections, particularly when aggregated.
Here for instance are the final polling averages and actual results from the last few elections.
2016
Polls 50.9% Coalition 49.1% ALP
Results 50.4% Coalition 49.6% ALP
2013
Polls 53.7% Coalition 46.3% ALP
Results 53.5% Coalition 46.5% ALP
2010
Polls 49.8% Coalition 50.2% ALP
Results 49.9% Coalition 50.1% ALP
A polling miss of even 1% is unlikely.
The current polling average is 48.2% Coalition 51.8% ALP. The state by state analysis and seat by seat polling suggests the Coalition is doing especially badly in some marginal seats. Additionally, they face some serious challenges in normally safe seats from Independents.
The race did tighten (at one point they were 45-55) but it has been around the 48-52 mark for two months now.
From here, I think that something dramatic would have to happen in the last week for the Coalition to win. A national emergency (real or synthetic), some huge scandal in the ALP at the senior level. Shorten might be dull as dishwater but the upside of that he is not likely to make an absurd cockup.
dv said:
The major pollsters in Australia have a good record in federal elections, particularly when aggregated.Here for instance are the final polling averages and actual results from the last few elections.
2016
Polls 50.9% Coalition 49.1% ALP
Results 50.4% Coalition 49.6% ALP2013
Polls 53.7% Coalition 46.3% ALP
Results 53.5% Coalition 46.5% ALP2010
Polls 49.8% Coalition 50.2% ALP
Results 49.9% Coalition 50.1% ALPA polling miss of even 1% is unlikely.
The current polling average is 48.2% Coalition 51.8% ALP. The state by state analysis and seat by seat polling suggests the Coalition is doing especially badly in some marginal seats. Additionally, they face some serious challenges in normally safe seats from Independents.
The race did tighten (at one point they were 45-55) but it has been around the 48-52 mark for two months now.
From here, I think that something dramatic would have to happen in the last week for the Coalition to win. A national emergency (real or synthetic), some huge scandal in the ALP at the senior level. Shorten might be dull as dishwater but the upside of that he is not likely to make an absurd cockup.
I think it’s high time we tried a “dull” PM. The “charismatic” model has been failing us spectacularly.
Michael V said:
dv said:
The major pollsters in Australia have a good record in federal elections, particularly when aggregated.Here for instance are the final polling averages and actual results from the last few elections.
2016
Polls 50.9% Coalition 49.1% ALP
Results 50.4% Coalition 49.6% ALP2013
Polls 53.7% Coalition 46.3% ALP
Results 53.5% Coalition 46.5% ALP2010
Polls 49.8% Coalition 50.2% ALP
Results 49.9% Coalition 50.1% ALPA polling miss of even 1% is unlikely.
The current polling average is 48.2% Coalition 51.8% ALP. The state by state analysis and seat by seat polling suggests the Coalition is doing especially badly in some marginal seats. Additionally, they face some serious challenges in normally safe seats from Independents.
The race did tighten (at one point they were 45-55) but it has been around the 48-52 mark for two months now.
From here, I think that something dramatic would have to happen in the last week for the Coalition to win. A national emergency (real or synthetic), some huge scandal in the ALP at the senior level. Shorten might be dull as dishwater but the upside of that he is not likely to make an absurd cockup.
I think it’s high time we tried a “dull” PM. The “charismatic” model has been failing us spectacularly.
Then a leadership challenge on the basis on the leader being dull and not doing anything and then replaced by someone with more character who does things.
Having a look at the Senate candidates for WA.
Hey-Zeus, what a deplorable bunch of fuckwittingtons. It’s gunna be hard to find even 6 out of that lot.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-10/federal-election-your-guide-to-the-wa-senate-ballot/11080108
oops – better post the linky-thing
party_pants said:
Having a look at the Senate candidates for WA.Hey-Zeus, what a deplorable bunch of fuckwittingtons. It’s gunna be hard to find even 6 out of that lot.
That was my problem when I voted early.
The Sunday Telegraph says, “time to end the worst period of political instability and cynicism since federation”, by reelecting the government.
They’ve gotta be taking the piss, right?
dv said:
The Sunday Telegraph says, “time to end the worst period of political instability and cynicism since federation”, by reelecting the government.
They’ve gotta be taking the piss, right?
Nah. It’s the new way of doing stuff. Say the opposite.
dv said:
The Sunday Telegraph says, “time to end the worst period of political instability and cynicism since federation”, by reelecting the government.
They’ve gotta be taking the piss, right?
let me guess, it was all Malcolm’s fault?
dv said:
The Sunday Telegraph says, “time to end the worst period of political instability and cynicism since federation”, by reelecting the government.
They’ve gotta be taking the piss, right?
Rupert doesn’t need money any more. And those who buy his pamphlets already agree with him.
So his mission in life is to just annoy the shit out of the rest of us.
Bubblecar said:
dv said:The Sunday Telegraph says, “time to end the worst period of political instability and cynicism since federation”, by reelecting the government.
They’ve gotta be taking the piss, right?
Rupert doesn’t need money any more. And those who buy his pamphlets already agree with him.
So his mission in life is to just annoy the shit out of the rest of us.
This seems like a bit of a shift for Rupert. Usually he bends with the wind and will back Labor if it looks likely that they’ll win. Then he expects favours in return for supporting them. This time has been a little bit different with Bill deciding not to meet with Rupert, and Rudd coming out and saying that accepting Rupert’s help previously was a decision he regretted. If Bill wins on Saturday it might be for the first time in ages that the eection has gone against Rupert’s call, and it might break the illusion of power he seems to wield.
dv said:
The Sunday Telegraph says, “time to end the worst period of political instability and cynicism since federation”, by reelecting the government.
They’ve gotta be taking the piss, right?
Their regular readers lap it all up. Piss and all.
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
dv said:The Sunday Telegraph says, “time to end the worst period of political instability and cynicism since federation”, by reelecting the government.
They’ve gotta be taking the piss, right?
Rupert doesn’t need money any more. And those who buy his pamphlets already agree with him.
So his mission in life is to just annoy the shit out of the rest of us.
This seems like a bit of a shift for Rupert. Usually he bends with the wind and will back Labor if it looks likely that they’ll win. Then he expects favours in return for supporting them. This time has been a little bit different with Bill deciding not to meet with Rupert, and Rudd coming out and saying that accepting Rupert’s help previously was a decision he regretted. If Bill wins on Saturday it might be for the first time in ages that the eection has gone against Rupert’s call, and it might break the illusion of power he seems to wield.
If so, that could be a good outcome.
> Welcome to the forum. Moll likes to make outrageous statements but then fails to respond to any replies.
Of course. I refuse to argue. You can either agree with me or disagree. Half the time, i don’t even agree with me.
quote=sibeen]
OK, my notes on the Victorian Senate Ballot paper candidates. Not in any order at the moment:
The Great Australian Party – right wing nutters
Yellow Vest Australia – anti muslim
Health Australia Party – anti vax
Australian Conservatives – Cory Bernadi + Family first
FRASER ANNING’S CONSERVATIVE NATIONAL PARTY – completely batshit
Sustainable Australia – anti immigration
Australian Labor Party – left wing nutters
Rise Up Australia Party – right wing nutters
The Greens (VIC) – see ALP
Animal Justice Party – probably vegan
Australian Workers Party – left wing ALP
VOTEFLUX.ORG | Upgrade Democracy! – vote for the death penalty
Pirate Party – completely rational
Pauline Hanson’s One Nation – I used to own a chip shop
Labour DLP – Catholic ALP
Secular Party of Australia – probably atheist
Liberal Democrats – potato heads natural party
Independents For Climate Action Now – independents who are in a party, are they on drugs
Australian Democrats – they’re still a thing?
Citizens Electoral Council – not in any way sane
Help End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party – no idea what these people want
Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party – lock up everybody
Climate Action! Immigration Action! Accountable Politicians! – they love colons
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers – guns, guns, guns
United Australia Party – Fat Clive + crnies
Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group) – I find it difficult to believe Fred is still alive.
The Small Business Party – right wing liberal
Socialist Equality Party – commies
Republican Party of Australia – god save the queen
Liberal – right wing nutters
Thank you sibeeen. That saves me heaps of work!
That narrows down the sensible selections enormously.
I’ll print that out and take it along when i vote.
Liberal party formally warned after breaching electoral laws
Party failed to properly authorise content appearing on Sydney Morning Herald, New Daily and Medical Daily sites
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/14/liberal-party-formally-warned-after-breaching-electoral-laws?CMP=soc_567
dv said:
Liberal party formally warned after breaching electoral lawsParty failed to properly authorise content appearing on Sydney Morning Herald, New Daily and Medical Daily sites
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/14/liberal-party-formally-warned-after-breaching-electoral-laws?CMP=soc_567
Seems the party fails at almost everything, including using Clive Palmer’s advertising.
A Facebook account linked to Clive Palmer’s United Australia party paid to disseminate an ad for the Queensland LNP.
On Sunday, a UAP-linked Facebook account named Australia Watch Nowspread an ad championing rival candidate, Brad Carswell, who is standing for the LNP in the Brisbane seat of Lilley.
UAP candidates scramble for volunteers as Clive Palmer campaigns from Fiji
Read more
The slickly produced video is a 35-second profile on Carswell, detailing his work in abattoirs, pubs, trucking and trimming trees, all with the LNP logo visible in the top right corner.
The Australia Watch Now page appears to be run by the UAP. It uses the party’s distinctive yellow branding, shares UAP campaign material, and is authorised to an “S Sokolova, United Australia Party” in Brisbane.
The ad for Carswell has since been removed.
The UAP and Liberal parties struck a preference deal in the early stages of the campaign, and Palmer’s party has seen its primary vote hit about 5% in recent Newspolls, thanks largely to a massive ad spend. The deal could prove crucial in key marginal seats and gives Palmer a greater chance of taking back a Senate spot.
Paid Facebook ads are effective because they can be targeted at a particular audience, but remain largely hidden from the broader public, unless users know where to look.
Questions have been raised about the overlap of the Liberals’ campaign with the UAP, with images emerging of Liberals handing out UAP campaign material, including in the marginal seat of Dunkley.
The UAP’s Victorian Senate candidate Catriona Thoolen said the Liberals were helping the UAP man polling booths.
dv said:
A Facebook account linked to Clive Palmer’s United Australia party paid to disseminate an ad for the Queensland LNP.On Sunday, a UAP-linked Facebook account named Australia Watch Nowspread an ad championing rival candidate, Brad Carswell, who is standing for the LNP in the Brisbane seat of Lilley.
UAP candidates scramble for volunteers as Clive Palmer campaigns from Fiji
Read more
The slickly produced video is a 35-second profile on Carswell, detailing his work in abattoirs, pubs, trucking and trimming trees, all with the LNP logo visible in the top right corner.
The Australia Watch Now page appears to be run by the UAP. It uses the party’s distinctive yellow branding, shares UAP campaign material, and is authorised to an “S Sokolova, United Australia Party” in Brisbane.
The ad for Carswell has since been removed.
The UAP and Liberal parties struck a preference deal in the early stages of the campaign, and Palmer’s party has seen its primary vote hit about 5% in recent Newspolls, thanks largely to a massive ad spend. The deal could prove crucial in key marginal seats and gives Palmer a greater chance of taking back a Senate spot.
Paid Facebook ads are effective because they can be targeted at a particular audience, but remain largely hidden from the broader public, unless users know where to look.
Questions have been raised about the overlap of the Liberals’ campaign with the UAP, with images emerging of Liberals handing out UAP campaign material, including in the marginal seat of Dunkley.
The UAP’s Victorian Senate candidate Catriona Thoolen said the Liberals were helping the UAP man polling booths.
I sincerely hope that the self-serving, lying thief – Palmer – does not get a senate seat.
https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/state/nsw/2019/05/14/nsw-coalition-civil-war-molan/
How come we only hear about the right wing minor parties?
It seems we have a Socialist Alliance Party in Australia. I haven’t heard them mentioned once.
The Rev Dodgson said:
How come we only hear about the right wing minor parties?It seems we have a Socialist Alliance Party in Australia. I haven’t heard them mentioned once.
You never heard of the Greens?
The Rev Dodgson said:
How come we only hear about the right wing minor parties?It seems we have a Socialist Alliance Party in Australia. I haven’t heard them mentioned once.
The left is dead these days, well except for Jeremy Corbyn.
furious said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
How come we only hear about the right wing minor parties?It seems we have a Socialist Alliance Party in Australia. I haven’t heard them mentioned once.
You never heard of the Greens?
The Soc Alls see the Greens as just another middle of the road party under the thumb of big business.
https://amp.afr.com/news/politics/national/abbott-camp-issues-sos-as-coalition-civil-war-erupts-in-nsw-20190514-p51nfu
ChrispenEvan said:
https://amp.afr.com/news/politics/national/abbott-camp-issues-sos-as-coalition-civil-war-erupts-in-nsw-20190514-p51nfu
I hope Tony Abbott loses on election day.
Undermining destructive bastard.
ChrispenEvan said:
https://amp.afr.com/news/politics/national/abbott-camp-issues-sos-as-coalition-civil-war-erupts-in-nsw-20190514-p51nfu
Hahaha good.
Bubblecar said:
ChrispenEvan said:
https://amp.afr.com/news/politics/national/abbott-camp-issues-sos-as-coalition-civil-war-erupts-in-nsw-20190514-p51nfu
Hahaha good.
I think we’ll all be glad to see the back of him.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/15/clive-palmer-gag-clause-qn-workers-told-to-make-no-disparaging-comments-if-they-want-entitlements?CMP=soc_567
Clive Palmer gag clause: QN workers told to make no ‘disparaging comments’ if they want entitlements
____
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/15/clive-palmer-gag-clause-qn-workers-told-to-make-no-disparaging-comments-if-they-want-entitlements?CMP=soc_567Clive Palmer gag clause: QN workers told to make no ‘disparaging comments’ if they want entitlements
____
gag,
Divine Angel said:
It gave me a chuckle anyway.. which is more than Clive has done for me.
The overnight temperatures are approaching frost levels.
Tue, May 14 3.4°C 18°C 0.2mm
Current outside temp according to BOMstats.

Current temp on thermometer in my wall clock facing me behind the computer.
I pay Australia Post for a business-related PO Box.
Estimate the number of ways I was displeased at receiving a “you’ve got mail” notification from them to find the PO box contained three identical election fliers from The Filth.
dv said:
I pay Australia Post for a business-related PO Box.Estimate the number of ways I was displeased at receiving a “you’ve got mail” notification from them to find the PO box contained three identical election fliers from The Filth.
4
party_pants said:
dv said:
I pay Australia Post for a business-related PO Box.Estimate the number of ways I was displeased at receiving a “you’ve got mail” notification from them to find the PO box contained three identical election fliers from The Filth.
4
8 ^O
Exactly so.
dv said:
I pay Australia Post for a business-related PO Box.Estimate the number of ways I was displeased at receiving a “you’ve got mail” notification from them to find the PO box contained three identical election fliers from The Filth.
42?
It’s only Thursday, but I’ll have a stab at a prediction:
ALP to win 6-8 seats, half of them in Victoria with one or two in QLD, WA and SA. Coalition to hold firm in NSW.
Emergence of a political divide between NSW and VIC with the other states falling somewhere in between.
Coalition to lose 10 seats, but not all to Labor. Expect at least 2 to go to moderate conservative independents.
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:
“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-15/few-details-in-united-australia-party-platform/11114346
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
And they wanted the world to know?
gobsmacked
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
Lord spare us.
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
FC ?
ChrispenEvan said:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-15/few-details-in-united-australia-party-platform/11114346
Look, matey, they’ll unite Australia and that’s all you need to know!
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
I share the same initials as Bill Shorten, but initials are a bullshit reason.
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
FC ?
LOL
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
FC ?
I’ll have to sit down and work that one out with a pencil….
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
Wonder how many morons in Australia. I’m thinking it must be a lot because we seem to have elected a lot of them.
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
But preferably:
“Well all the polls were indicating a Labor victory, but no-one expected the complete wipe-out of the Coalition that we’re now witnessing. It’s quite astounding.”
“…and Prime Minister Scott Morrison now joins the other senior Liberal Party figures who have lost their seats.”
party_pants said:
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
I share the same initials as Bill Shorten, but initials are a bullshit reason.
I’ve got the same initials as the prime minister, so I’ll always win.
https://amp.smh.com.au/federal-election-2019/tax-revenue-reaches-howard-era-levels-and-it-s-workers-and-super-funds-paying-20190429-p51i80.html
Hang on I’m just tuning my crystal balls.
I’ve got something coming through……………yes there’s a lot of static………..some pictures coming through now….they are grainy…black and white………..sound of cheering………looks like Scomo and he’s saying………………something…..something…….you stayed the course……you kept the faith……………it’s fading……..lost it………..
Don’t know, don’t know who won…………..
Unfortunately, that is the most fanciful of your musings…
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
But preferably:
“Well all the polls were indicating a Labor victory, but no-one expected the complete wipe-out of the Coalition that we’re now witnessing. It’s quite astounding.”
“…and Prime Minister Scott Morrison now joins the other senior Liberal Party figures who have lost their seats.”
“Can I just interrupt you there to report that Donald Trump and Theresa May are also about to concede defeat. Switching to the Republican tally room now…”
furious said:
- …and Prime Minister Scott Morrison now joins the other senior Liberal Party figures who have lost their seats.
Unfortunately, that is the most fanciful of your musings…
And the Liberals lose every single seat and as they made a bet they now all get deported
Bonus prediction:
If the ALP win the election and Bill Shorten becomes the next PM, expect Donal Trump to tweet something that sounds like sour grapes about it.
party_pants said:
Bonus prediction:If the ALP win the election and Bill Shorten becomes the next PM, expect Donal Trump to tweet something that sounds like sour grapes about it.
Will he even notice?
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
Bonus prediction:If the ALP win the election and Bill Shorten becomes the next PM, expect Donal Trump to tweet something that sounds like sour grapes about it.
Will he even notice?
Yes.
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
Bonus prediction:If the ALP win the election and Bill Shorten becomes the next PM, expect Donal Trump to tweet something that sounds like sour grapes about it.
Will he even notice?
Probably not.
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
To whom?
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
I reckon Abbott will go before Dutton.
roughbarked said:
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
Wonder how many morons in Australia. I’m thinking it must be a lot because we seem to have elected a lot of them.
I’d rather vote for Clive Palmer than for Labor or Liberal, or Green.
mollwollfumble said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
To whom?
Abbott is in real danger of losing his seat to Zali Whatsername, the Winter Olympics skier. Many of his on-the-ground volunteers have abandoned him and gone to work for other campaigners in other seats. e is struggling a bit.
sarahs mum said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
I reckon Abbott will go before Dutton.
Might not happen, but could just be fanciful polling, who knows.
“Tony Abbott’s prospects of surviving a challenge from independent candidate Zali Steggall appear to have improved, according to internal Liberal Party polling that shows him level at 50-50.”
mollwollfumble said:
roughbarked said:
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
Wonder how many morons in Australia. I’m thinking it must be a lot because we seem to have elected a lot of them.
I’d rather vote for Clive Palmer than for Labor or Liberal, or Green.
so what of his policies do you agree with?
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
You would not believe how fucken thrilled I would be if Julian Burnside took Frydenburg’s seat off him.
Really.
Really really, even.
Liberals of course hope they do away with all the environment nonsense
Rule 303 said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
You would not believe how fucken thrilled I would be if Julian Burnside took Frydenburg’s seat off him.
Really.
Really really, even.
I would also celebrate this.
sarahs mum said:
Rule 303 said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
You would not believe how fucken thrilled I would be if Julian Burnside took Frydenburg’s seat off him.
Really.
Really really, even.
I would also celebrate this.
It would be a good and warming thing.
Bubblecar said:
sarahs mum said:
Rule 303 said:You would not believe how fucken thrilled I would be if Julian Burnside took Frydenburg’s seat off him.
Really.
Really really, even.
I would also celebrate this.
It would be a good and warming thing.
…hmm, although looking him up on Wikipedia, maybe not.
ChrispenEvan said:
mollwollfumble said:
roughbarked said:Wonder how many morons in Australia. I’m thinking it must be a lot because we seem to have elected a lot of them.
I’d rather vote for Clive Palmer than for Labor or Liberal, or Green.
so what of his policies do you agree with?
It’s hard to be against motherhood.
party_pants said:
ChrispenEvan said:
mollwollfumble said:I’d rather vote for Clive Palmer than for Labor or Liberal, or Green.
so what of his policies do you agree with?
It’s hard to be against motherhood.
read his policy statement page, all 177 words.
:-)
party_pants said:
ChrispenEvan said:
mollwollfumble said:I’d rather vote for Clive Palmer than for Labor or Liberal, or Green.
so what of his policies do you agree with?
It’s hard to be against motherhood.
Our mollwolfumble is an incurable contrarian.
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
ChrispenEvan said:so what of his policies do you agree with?
It’s hard to be against motherhood.
Our mollwolfumble is an incurable contrarian.
Not even an incurable contrarian could be against motherhood. I tried it and didn’t last very long.
It would actually be amusing to see Clive become PM and then have to give all the pensioners an extra $150 a week while slashing taxes.
mollwollfumble said:
roughbarked said:
poikilotherm said:
Some moron was just on the radio saying they voted for Clive Palmer, their sole reasoning for this was they have the same initials at the fat man.
Wonder how many morons in Australia. I’m thinking it must be a lot because we seem to have elected a lot of them.
I’d rather vote for Clive Palmer than for Labor or Liberal, or Green.
I don’t want to ask you why.
Bubblecar said:
It would actually be amusing to see Clive become PM and then have to give all the pensioners an extra $150 a week while slashing taxes.
We could be Venezuela too.
poikilotherm said:
Bubblecar said:
It would actually be amusing to see Clive become PM and then have to give all the pensioners an extra $150 a week while slashing taxes.
We could be Venezuela too.
Nah. we’d all have to learn Spanish first.
The-Spectator said:
Liberals of course hope they do away with all the environment nonsense
They’ve already tried that and failed miserably.
We need a nice church going god fearing Christian conservative who will put all these minorities back in their place
Anyway, I voted today despite friends telling me I should wait until the last day to find out which party shows up as best.
From the long queues, I’d be surprised if anyone bothers to wait until Saturday.
The-Spectator said:
We need a nice church going god fearing Christian conservative who will put all these minorities back in their place
We’ve had three of those in the past five years and what good came of it?
roughbarked said:
Anyway, I voted today despite friends telling me I should wait until the last day to find out which party shows up as best.
From the long queues, I’d be surprised if anyone bothers to wait until Saturday.
You postal voted ?
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Anyway, I voted today despite friends telling me I should wait until the last day to find out which party shows up as best.
From the long queues, I’d be surprised if anyone bothers to wait until Saturday.
You postal voted ?
No. Pre poll. I was driving past and thought well, I know who I’m voting for and I don’t do sausage sizzles so I dropped in an voted.
The-Spectator said:
We need a nice church going god fearing Christian conservative who will put all these minorities back in their place
I’m thinking The-Spectator is another Cymek attempt at comedy sock puppetry.
Bubblecar said:
The-Spectator said:
We need a nice church going god fearing Christian conservative who will put all these minorities back in their place
I’m thinking The-Spectator is another Cymek attempt at comedy sock puppetry.
Not me
Cymek said:
Bubblecar said:
The-Spectator said:
We need a nice church going god fearing Christian conservative who will put all these minorities back in their place
I’m thinking The-Spectator is another Cymek attempt at comedy sock puppetry.
Not me
Fair enough.
Bubblecar said:
Cymek said:
Bubblecar said:I’m thinking The-Spectator is another Cymek attempt at comedy sock puppetry.
Not me
Fair enough.
I’d say that the spectator is simply The_Observer under a new pseudonym.
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
Cymek said:Not me
Fair enough.
I’d say that the spectator is simply The_Observer under a new pseudonym.
Aye.
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:Fair enough.
I’d say that the spectator is simply The_Observer under a new pseudonym.
Aye.
He’s clearly not too bright.
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
Cymek said:Not me
Fair enough.
I’d say that the spectator is simply The_Observer under a new pseudonym.
really???? Lab notified!!!
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
Cymek said:Not me
Fair enough.
I’d say that the spectator is simply The_Observer under a new pseudonym.
+1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:Fair enough.
I’d say that the spectator is simply The_Observer under a new pseudonym.
+1
Didn’t need Sherlock Holmes to work that one out.
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:I’d say that the spectator is simply The_Observer under a new pseudonym.
+1
Didn’t need Sherlock Holmes to work that one out.
I pointed that out after his very first post.
But he hasn’t been fucking the place up much so I then suspected it was just Cymek (who was puppeting BC & Zarkov) being the Spectator.
Bubblecar said:
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:+1
Didn’t need Sherlock Holmes to work that one out.
I pointed that out after his very first post.
But he hasn’t been fucking the place up much so I then suspected it was just Cymek (who was puppeting BC & Zarkov) being the Spectator.
Even GW deniers get lonely. I suspect he is tempering himself so as to not force people to email CB88 about him when he’s trolling.
party_pants said:
mollwollfumble said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m hearing Antony Green’s election night voice:“…and on those figures, there’s now no way back for Peter Dutton.”
“Well it was touch and go for much of the evening, but now I’m prepared to say that Tony Abbott has definitely lost his seat.”
To whom?
Abbott is in real danger of losing his seat to Zali Whatsername, the Winter Olympics skier. Many of his on-the-ground volunteers have abandoned him and gone to work for other campaigners in other seats. e is struggling a bit.
I think we should also recognize Zali Stegall’s barrister qualifications.
roughbarked said:
Anyway, I voted today despite friends telling me I should wait until the last day to find out which party shows up as best.
From the long queues, I’d be surprised if anyone bothers to wait until Saturday.
I’m going on Saturday. Apparently the queues for early voting in Hamilton are out the door and around the corner. I bet I can just wander in to our local hall and not have to wait on Saturday.
buffy said:
party_pants said:
mollwollfumble said:To whom?
Abbott is in real danger of losing his seat to Zali Whatsername, the Winter Olympics skier. Many of his on-the-ground volunteers have abandoned him and gone to work for other campaigners in other seats. e is struggling a bit.
I think we should also recognize Zali Stegall’s barrister qualifications.
Oh, all right… do I really have to?
I don’t even live on that side of the country
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:Fair enough.
I’d say that the spectator is simply The_Observer under a new pseudonym.
+1
I have a different theory. I think it is someone much more clever. But I’ll bide my time.
buffy said:
party_pants said:
mollwollfumble said:To whom?
Abbott is in real danger of losing his seat to Zali Whatsername, the Winter Olympics skier. Many of his on-the-ground volunteers have abandoned him and gone to work for other campaigners in other seats. e is struggling a bit.
I think we should also recognize Zali Stegall’s barrister qualifications.
Great News.
I’ve never heard of her but I wish her good luck and I hope she beats Toney Abbott.
buffy said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:I’d say that the spectator is simply The_Observer under a new pseudonym.
+1
I have a different theory. I think it is someone much more clever. But I’ll bide my time.
it isn’t me.
ChrispenEvan said:
buffy said:
Tau.Neutrino said:+1
I have a different theory. I think it is someone much more clever. But I’ll bide my time.
it isn’t me.
No, I wasn’t thinking that, bright and intelligent as I think you are…
buffy said:
ChrispenEvan said:
buffy said:I have a different theory. I think it is someone much more clever. But I’ll bide my time.
it isn’t me.
No, I wasn’t thinking that, bright and intelligent as I think you are…
i know. it was of my self depreciating humour.
ChrispenEvan said:
buffy said:
ChrispenEvan said:it isn’t me.
No, I wasn’t thinking that, bright and intelligent as I think you are…
i know. it was (some) of my self depreciating humour.
fixed
Today’s seat by seat polls are pretty much as expected except for Flynn in Qld which shows a 2% swing TO the Coalition. It’s a small poll, and hence high margin of error, but still.
dv said:
Today’s seat by seat polls are pretty much as expected except for Flynn in Qld which shows a 2% swing TO the Coalition. It’s a small poll, and hence high margin of error, but still.
Who’s conducting seat by seat polls?
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Today’s seat by seat polls are pretty much as expected except for Flynn in Qld which shows a 2% swing TO the Coalition. It’s a small poll, and hence high margin of error, but still.
Who’s conducting seat by seat polls?
YouGov
So dv, what sort of result are you anticipating?
Comfortable ALP victory?
Will Abbott and Dutton lose their seats?
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
Anyway, I voted today despite friends telling me I should wait until the last day to find out which party shows up as best.
From the long queues, I’d be surprised if anyone bothers to wait until Saturday.
I’m going on Saturday. Apparently the queues for early voting in Hamilton are out the door and around the corner. I bet I can just wander in to our local hall and not have to wait on Saturday.
SWMBO was telling me that there’s a booth set up opposite Parliament Station in central Melbourne. Tells me the queue is about 50 metres long. Stuff that, I’ll wander up the street late Saturday and walk straight in. I’ll then put one R.Muir as #1 on the senate ticket. I’m yet to decide who gets the golden razzie.
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Today’s seat by seat polls are pretty much as expected except for Flynn in Qld which shows a 2% swing TO the Coalition. It’s a small poll, and hence high margin of error, but still.
Who’s conducting seat by seat polls?
YouGov
Can you provide a link? I can’t seem to find it amongst the fluff on their website.
Yeah, surely if everyone else is voting early then Democracy sausage day will be much quieter.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/federal-election-2019-seat-by-seat-poll-results-show-latest-trends/news-story/a696eeb55dc8a4d479e77ad8e6016f8d
sibeen said:
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
Anyway, I voted today despite friends telling me I should wait until the last day to find out which party shows up as best.
From the long queues, I’d be surprised if anyone bothers to wait until Saturday.
I’m going on Saturday. Apparently the queues for early voting in Hamilton are out the door and around the corner. I bet I can just wander in to our local hall and not have to wait on Saturday.
SWMBO was telling me that there’s a booth set up opposite Parliament Station in central Melbourne. Tells me the queue is about 50 metres long. Stuff that, I’ll wander up the street late Saturday and walk straight in. I’ll then put one R.Muir as #1 on the senate ticket. I’m yet to decide who gets the golden razzie.
You’re really comfortable supporting the Shooters etc party?
I plan to go at about 9-9.30 am ish, just after breakfast and a second cuppa.
sibeen said:
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/federal-election-2019-seat-by-seat-poll-results-show-latest-trends/news-story/a696eeb55dc8a4d479e77ad8e6016f8d
Subscriber only for me.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:
buffy said:I’m going on Saturday. Apparently the queues for early voting in Hamilton are out the door and around the corner. I bet I can just wander in to our local hall and not have to wait on Saturday.
SWMBO was telling me that there’s a booth set up opposite Parliament Station in central Melbourne. Tells me the queue is about 50 metres long. Stuff that, I’ll wander up the street late Saturday and walk straight in. I’ll then put one R.Muir as #1 on the senate ticket. I’m yet to decide who gets the golden razzie.
You’re really comfortable supporting the Shooters etc party?
I’m not. The other candidate they have will be mid pack at best. I’m voting for the man in this case.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/federal-election-2019-seat-by-seat-poll-results-show-latest-trends/news-story/a696eeb55dc8a4d479e77ad8e6016f8d
Subscriber only for me.
I just clicked the x in the top corner and it opened up for me. I’m certainly not a subscriber.
Bubblecar said:
So dv, what sort of result are you anticipating?Comfortable ALP victory?
Will Abbott and Dutton lose their seats?
I’m hearing conflicting reports. Everything from Bookies are paying out early (seems unlikely) to we’re unlikely to have a result on Saturday night because it’s too close to call.
Divine Angel said:
Bubblecar said:
So dv, what sort of result are you anticipating?Comfortable ALP victory?
Will Abbott and Dutton lose their seats?
I’m hearing conflicting reports. Everything from Bookies are paying out early (seems unlikely) to we’re unlikely to have a result on Saturday night because it’s too close to call.
Bookies are cynically paying out early so people have money in the betting accounts for the weekend to bet more on sports.
Divine Angel said:
Bubblecar said:
So dv, what sort of result are you anticipating?Comfortable ALP victory?
Will Abbott and Dutton lose their seats?
I’m hearing conflicting reports. Everything from Bookies are paying out early (seems unlikely) to we’re unlikely to have a result on Saturday night because it’s too close to call.
I don’t want that degree of suspense.
It will be nice if Labor gets enough of its own to not court Greens or independents. I can’t see LNP getting up at all, though I think Abbott might surprise, he is popular in his electorate and in real life apparently very nice.
When it was Rudd some talking head said if you like Rudd and dislike Abbott don’t meet either.
Divine Angel said:
Bubblecar said:
So dv, what sort of result are you anticipating?Comfortable ALP victory?
Will Abbott and Dutton lose their seats?
I’m hearing conflicting reports. Everything from Bookies are paying out early (seems unlikely) to we’re unlikely to have a result on Saturday night because it’s too close to call.
Who cares, so long as they do. Even they don’t care, because they have both been around long enough to collect big fat pensions. Politicians new since 1994 get nothing.
AwesomeO said:
It will be nice if Labor gets enough of its own to not court Greens or independents. I can’t see LNP getting up at all, though I think Abbott might surprise, he is popular in his electorate and in real life apparently very nice.When it was Rudd some talking head said if you like Rudd and dislike Abbott don’t meet either.
Met Rudd very impressed.
AwesomeO said:
It will be nice if Labor gets enough of its own to not court Greens or independents. I can’t see LNP getting up at all, though I think Abbott might surprise, he is popular in his electorate and in real life apparently very nice.When it was Rudd some talking head said if you like Rudd and dislike Abbott don’t meet either.
Is it still likely that we will have a hung by the liberals upper house?
>and in real life apparently very nice.
Very nice in the eyes of similar intellectually and emotionally challenged individuals, I’d imagine.
sarahs mum said:
AwesomeO said:
It will be nice if Labor gets enough of its own to not court Greens or independents. I can’t see LNP getting up at all, though I think Abbott might surprise, he is popular in his electorate and in real life apparently very nice.When it was Rudd some talking head said if you like Rudd and dislike Abbott don’t meet either.
Is it still likely that we will have a hung by the liberals upper house?
Let’s hope they’re not bolstered by too many out-&-out Nazis.
Bubblecar said:
>and in real life apparently very nice.Very nice in the eyes of similar intellectually and emotionally challenged individuals, I’d imagine.
The bloke was a Rhodes scholar, I very much doubt he’s of low intellect.
AwesomeO said:
It will be nice if Labor gets enough of its own to not court Greens or independents. I can’t see LNP getting up at all, though I think Abbott might surprise, he is popular in his electorate and in real life apparently very nice.When it was Rudd some talking head said if you like Rudd and dislike Abbott don’t meet either.
Between them they got a cock and balls on my ballot paper that time. Not a question of either of them being a nice bloke. We’ve managed to rid ourselves of one, be great if the other could follow him into obscurity.
well ck some computer just called my ‘phone and claimed to be “Scott Morrison”
don’t remember giving any of these parties my number
dirty
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
>and in real life apparently very nice.Very nice in the eyes of similar intellectually and emotionally challenged individuals, I’d imagine.
The bloke was a Rhodes scholar, I very much doubt he’s of low intellect.
Then how do you account for his worldview?
There are plenty of academic achievers who are nonetheless devoid of basic reasoning skills.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
>and in real life apparently very nice.Very nice in the eyes of similar intellectually and emotionally challenged individuals, I’d imagine.
The bloke was a Rhodes scholar, I very much doubt he’s of low intellect.
then the Rhodes scholars i’ve met must overrepresent the low intellect ones
SCIENCE said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
>and in real life apparently very nice.Very nice in the eyes of similar intellectually and emotionally challenged individuals, I’d imagine.
The bloke was a Rhodes scholar, I very much doubt he’s of low intellect.
then the Rhodes scholars i’ve met must overrepresent the low intellect ones
bob, a rhodes scholar, is dead.
Bubblecar said:
>and in real life apparently very nice.Very nice in the eyes of similar intellectually and emotionally challenged individuals, I’d imagine.
Meh, it would be smart not to assume that everyone you disagree with must be stupid.
SCIENCE said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
>and in real life apparently very nice.Very nice in the eyes of similar intellectually and emotionally challenged individuals, I’d imagine.
The bloke was a Rhodes scholar, I very much doubt he’s of low intellect.
then the Rhodes scholars i’ve met must overrepresent the low intellect ones
He’s not dumb, he’s just not a lively conversationalist or public speaker. His academic results must have been very good.
Bubblecar said:
So dv, what sort of result are you anticipating?Comfortable ALP victory?
Will Abbott and Dutton lose their seats?
I’m a little chastened by some of the seat polls. Abbott in Warringah and Dutton in Dickson will be close as heck, and it’s hard to predict because it’s unclear how the UAP prefs will go.
Overall I don’t think it will be a huge win but I do think ALP will win, ending up with 77 to 80 seats. The polling tightened but it stopped tightening three weeks ago in the fair dinkum department.
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
So dv, what sort of result are you anticipating?Comfortable ALP victory?
Will Abbott and Dutton lose their seats?
I’m a little chastened by some of the seat polls. Abbott in Warringah and Dutton in Dickson will be close as heck, and it’s hard to predict because it’s unclear how the UAP prefs will go.
Overall I don’t think it will be a huge win but I do think ALP will win, ending up with 77 to 80 seats. The polling tightened but it stopped tightening three weeks ago in the fair dinkum department.
So we’re in for a tense night.
I’d better invest in some whisky.
Bob as an RAF reserve pilot at Oxford.

Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Who’s conducting seat by seat polls?
YouGov
Can you provide a link? I can’t seem to find it amongst the fluff on their website.
Here are some articles on it
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/federal-election-2019-seat-by-seat-poll-results-show-latest-trends/news-story/a696eeb55dc8a4d479e77ad8e6016f8d
https://www.pollbludger.net/2019/05/16/ipsos-51-49-labor-4/
YouGov’s Dickson poll has Dutton ahead 51-49. Combined with the Flynn poll this dampens my optimism for Qld.
dv said:
YouGov’s Dickson poll has Dutton ahead 51-49. Combined with the Flynn poll this dampens my optimism for Qld.
I’m never optimistic about Qld.
sibeen said:
dv said:
YouGov’s Dickson poll has Dutton ahead 51-49. Combined with the Flynn poll this dampens my optimism for Qld.
I’m never optimistic about Qld.
Me neither.
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
YouGov’s Dickson poll has Dutton ahead 51-49. Combined with the Flynn poll this dampens my optimism for Qld.
I’m never optimistic about Qld.
Me neither.
I am.
Peak Warming Man said:
party_pants said:
sibeen said:I’m never optimistic about Qld.
Me neither.
I am.
Sunlit uplands
However Bob’s passing has put the election result beyond doubt.
Perfect timing Bob, a true party man right to the end.
Peak Warming Man said:
party_pants said:
sibeen said:I’m never optimistic about Qld.
Me neither.
I am.
Yet I note that your bolt hole is located in NSW.

sibeen said:
Peak Warming Man said:
party_pants said:Me neither.
I am.
Yet I note that your bolt hole is located in NSW.
I’ve annexed it in the Name of Queensland, it’s hares as well.
The Andrew Bolt hole
Peak Warming Man said:
However Bob’s passing has put the election result beyond doubt.
Perfect timing Bob, a true party man right to the end.
I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
However Bob’s passing has put the election result beyond doubt.
Perfect timing Bob, a true party man right to the end.
I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
The media blackout is meaningless these days because I think it doesn’t apply to the phone or the internet and that is where people live these days.
Peak Warming Man said:
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
However Bob’s passing has put the election result beyond doubt.
Perfect timing Bob, a true party man right to the end.
I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
The media blackout is meaningless these days because I think it doesn’t apply to the phone or the internet and that is where people live these days.
true.
Peak Warming Man said:
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
However Bob’s passing has put the election result beyond doubt.
Perfect timing Bob, a true party man right to the end.
I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
The media blackout is meaningless these days because I think it doesn’t apply to the phone or the internet and that is where people live these days.
It’s good to be able to listen to the radio in the car again.
“Melbourne Storm narrowly beat Wests Tigers in Thursday night NRL thriller”
Well bugger me, I listened to that in the car all the way up here, the Tigers were home for all money when I lost the station.
Peak Warming Man said:
“Melbourne Storm narrowly beat Wests Tigers in Thursday night NRL thriller”Well bugger me, I listened to that in the car all the way up here, the Tigers were home for all money when I lost the station.
Pardon me.
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
However Bob’s passing has put the election result beyond doubt.
Perfect timing Bob, a true party man right to the end.
I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
However Bob’s passing has put the election result beyond doubt.
Perfect timing Bob, a true party man right to the end.
I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
Well, a belated happy birthday to you.
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
However Bob’s passing has put the election result beyond doubt.
Perfect timing Bob, a true party man right to the end.
I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
You’re as bad as Boris.
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
Well, a belated happy birthday to you.
x2
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
Well, a belated happy birthday to you.
Thanks. I was out having a lovely dinner with Mrs rb. Got home to get the news about Bob from a neighbour who had come to say HB. :( I really liked Bob as a bloke as well as PM.
Met him once in a local bar.
Peak Warming Man said:
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
You’re as bad as Boris.
Let’s not go overboard.
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
However Bob’s passing has put the election result beyond doubt.
Perfect timing Bob, a true party man right to the end.
I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
Many happy returns roughie :)
How old are you these days?
Peak Warming Man said:
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
You’re as bad as Boris.
No. I only have the one each year.
sibeen said:
Peak Warming Man said:
roughbarked said:Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
You’re as bad as Boris.
Let’s not go overboard.
;)
Bubblecar said:
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:I thought the timing was good too. Advertsing blackout in and Bob has all the news.
Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
Many happy returns roughie :)
How old are you these days?
hit route 66.
roughbarked said:
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:Trouble is, he picked my birthday.
Well, a belated happy birthday to you.
Thanks. I was out having a lovely dinner with Mrs rb. Got home to get the news about Bob from a neighbour who had come to say HB. :( I really liked Bob as a bloke as well as PM.
Met him once in a local bar.
There was a rumour for a while in Mole Creek that I was Bob Hawke’s son. His son was living somewhere in the area at the time.
“That’s Hawke’s son”, I would hear strangers say. But they were wrong.
Bubblecar said:
roughbarked said:
party_pants said:Well, a belated happy birthday to you.
Thanks. I was out having a lovely dinner with Mrs rb. Got home to get the news about Bob from a neighbour who had come to say HB. :( I really liked Bob as a bloke as well as PM.
Met him once in a local bar.
There was a rumour for a while in Mole Creek that I was Bob Hawke’s son. His son was living somewhere in the area at the time.
“That’s Hawke’s son”, I would hear strangers say. But they were wrong.
Nice to have a bit of notoriety. :)
Anyway, going on what I’ve seen of the people talking about the election, Victoria might well be voting strongly against the coalition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH_MBwQhGgA
That’s why I’m voting Green.
sibeen said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH_MBwQhGgAThat’s why I’m voting Green.
That’s a relief.
I thought you were serious there for a minute.
The Rev Dodgson said:
sibeen said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH_MBwQhGgAThat’s why I’m voting Green.
That’s a relief.
I thought you were serious there for a minute.
nah, he’s just being a wanker.
:-)
morning sibeen.Well the lady who reads fortunes by throwing asparagus on the floor has predicted that the coalition will win the election, but it will be very close.
Divine Angel said:
Well the lady who reads fortunes by throwing asparagus on the floor has predicted that the coalition will win the election, but it will be very close.
Tinned or fresh? Can open or not?
kii said:
Divine Angel said:
Well the lady who reads fortunes by throwing asparagus on the floor has predicted that the coalition will win the election, but it will be very close.
Tinned or fresh? Can open or not?
She uses fresh. I’m trying to find a clip but there’s nothing uploaded yet.
The Rev Dodgson said:
sibeen said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH_MBwQhGgAThat’s why I’m voting Green.
That’s a relief.
I thought you were serious there for a minute.
I’m actually voting green. I’m happy for Nick McKim to go back to Canberra. Nick is okay.
sarahs mum said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
sibeen said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH_MBwQhGgAThat’s why I’m voting Green.
That’s a relief.
I thought you were serious there for a minute.
I’m actually voting green. I’m happy for Nick McKim to go back to Canberra. Nick is okay.
Me too.
I just didn’t want to have to review that position in the knowledge that I’d be voting in the same way as sibeen :)
The Rev Dodgson said:
sarahs mum said:
The Rev Dodgson said:That’s a relief.
I thought you were serious there for a minute.
I’m actually voting green. I’m happy for Nick McKim to go back to Canberra. Nick is okay.
Me too.
I just didn’t want to have to review that position in the knowledge that I’d be voting in the same way as sibeen :)
Inheritance tax. No way. Ever!
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
sarahs mum said:I’m actually voting green. I’m happy for Nick McKim to go back to Canberra. Nick is okay.
Me too.
I just didn’t want to have to review that position in the knowledge that I’d be voting in the same way as sibeen :)
Inheritance tax. No way. Ever!
1) Lots of places have inheritance taxes, without the sky falling in.
2) Even if you think such a tax would be the work of the devil, there is zero chance of it being implemented without the support of one of the major parties, even if they did have the balance of power.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Me too.
I just didn’t want to have to review that position in the knowledge that I’d be voting in the same way as sibeen :)
Inheritance tax. No way. Ever!
1) Lots of places have inheritance taxes, without the sky falling in.
2) Even if you think such a tax would be the work of the devil, there is zero chance of it being implemented without the support of one of the major parties, even if they did have the balance of power.
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:Inheritance tax. No way. Ever!
1) Lots of places have inheritance taxes, without the sky falling in.
2) Even if you think such a tax would be the work of the devil, there is zero chance of it being implemented without the support of one of the major parties, even if they did have the balance of power.
I’m not concerned about other places. My concern is purely local.
OK, but I’m just suggesting that experience at other places indicates that it’s no big deal.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:1) Lots of places have inheritance taxes, without the sky falling in.
2) Even if you think such a tax would be the work of the devil, there is zero chance of it being implemented without the support of one of the major parties, even if they did have the balance of power.
I’m not concerned about other places. My concern is purely local.OK, but I’m just suggesting that experience at other places indicates that it’s no big deal.
In my case it is a big deal. Due to the untimely deaths of some family members my death would cause the forced sale of several family homes with the result that the remaining members would have nowhere practical to live.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:1) Lots of places have inheritance taxes, without the sky falling in.
2) Even if you think such a tax would be the work of the devil, there is zero chance of it being implemented without the support of one of the major parties, even if they did have the balance of power.
I’m not concerned about other places. My concern is purely local.OK, but I’m just suggesting that experience at other places indicates that it’s no big deal.
230 million Chinese cigarette smokers must be on to something!
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:I’m not concerned about other places. My concern is purely local.
OK, but I’m just suggesting that experience at other places indicates that it’s no big deal.
230 million Chinese cigarette smokers must be on to something!
Do they have inheritance taxes in China?
Even if they do, I’m not sure what it has to do with cigarette smokers.
#DoItForBob is trending on twitter. (Meaning, vote Labor in memory of Hawke)
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:OK, but I’m just suggesting that experience at other places indicates that it’s no big deal.
230 million Chinese cigarette smokers must be on to something!
Do they have inheritance taxes in China?
Even if they do, I’m not sure what it has to do with cigarette smokers.
cigarette smokers die!!!
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:OK, but I’m just suggesting that experience at other places indicates that it’s no big deal.
230 million Chinese cigarette smokers must be on to something!
Do they have inheritance taxes in China?
Even if they do, I’m not sure what it has to do with cigarette smokers.
The Chinese State owns most of everything so taxes are irrelevant.
Divine Angel said:
#DoItForBob is trending on twitter. (Meaning, vote Labor in memory of Hawke)
That’d be up there with stupid reasons to vote; some dude from the 80s died.
Divine Angel said:
#DoItForBob is trending on twitter. (Meaning, vote Labor in memory of Hawke)
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:230 million Chinese cigarette smokers must be on to something!
Do they have inheritance taxes in China?
Even if they do, I’m not sure what it has to do with cigarette smokers.
cigarette smokers die!!!
EVerybody dies, but other places love smoking so we should look in to it too.
Stupidity aside, where’d the inheritance tax idea come from? The fake greens and the ALP both state they have no policy or plan for such a thing.
poikilotherm said:
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Do they have inheritance taxes in China?
Even if they do, I’m not sure what it has to do with cigarette smokers.
cigarette smokers die!!!
EVerybody dies, but other places love smoking so we should look in to it too.
logical fallacy, false equivalence.
poikilotherm said:
Stupidity aside, where’d the inheritance tax idea come from? The fake greens and the ALP both state they have no policy or plan for such a thing.
Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
Stupidity aside, where’d the inheritance tax idea come from? The fake greens and the ALP both state they have no policy or plan for such a thing.
Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
There aren’t any in Aus politics at the moment, just some socialists using the name afaict.
ChrispenEvan said:
poikilotherm said:
ChrispenEvan said:cigarette smokers die!!!
EVerybody dies, but other places love smoking so we should look in to it too.
logical fallacy, false equivalence.
Exactly.
If we look at countries where more people smoke, we see that there are bad health effects as a result, suggesting that smoking may be a bad thing to do.
If we look at countries where they have inheritance taxes, we see that there is no clear evidence of this having a significant detrimental effect, suggesting that it’s no big deal either way (other than for those of enormous wealth).
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
Stupidity aside, where’d the inheritance tax idea come from? The fake greens and the ALP both state they have no policy or plan for such a thing.
Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
There aren’t any in Aus politics at the moment, just some socialists using the name afaict.
people on the far right think any centralist party is socialist.
;-)
The Rev Dodgson said:
ChrispenEvan said:
poikilotherm said:EVerybody dies, but other places love smoking so we should look in to it too.
logical fallacy, false equivalence.
Exactly.
If we look at countries where more people smoke, we see that there are bad health effects as a result, suggesting that smoking may be a bad thing to do.
If we look at countries where they have inheritance taxes, we see that there is no clear evidence of this having a significant detrimental effect, suggesting that it’s no big deal either way (other than for those of enormous wealth).
You’re all so serious. I’ll use pink font next time.
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
Stupidity aside, where’d the inheritance tax idea come from? The fake greens and the ALP both state they have no policy or plan for such a thing.
Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
There aren’t any in Aus politics at the moment, just some socialists using the name afaict.
Seems to be the case in NSW. Not sure about the rest.
ChrispenEvan said:
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
There aren’t any in Aus politics at the moment, just some socialists using the name afaict.
people on the far right think any centralist party is socialist.
;-)
I guess, but they’re as odd as the far left.
party_pants said:
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
There aren’t any in Aus politics at the moment, just some socialists using the name afaict.
Seems to be the case in NSW. Not sure about the rest.
Me either, but that’s my bubble.
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
Stupidity aside, where’d the inheritance tax idea come from? The fake greens and the ALP both state they have no policy or plan for such a thing.
Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
There aren’t any in Aus politics at the moment, just some socialists using the name afaict.
In spite of the popularity of the rightist watermelon meme, as far as I can see, that’s just crap.
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
Stupidity aside, where’d the inheritance tax idea come from? The fake greens and the ALP both state they have no policy or plan for such a thing.
Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
Like the IRA & the Real IRA.
ChrispenEvan said:
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
There aren’t any in Aus politics at the moment, just some socialists using the name afaict.
people on the far right think any centralist party is socialist.
;-)
South Africa was so far right the Govt said the Pope was a Communist.
All I know is if the Greens hold the balance of power in the lower house after the election well have paedophiles grooming our kids in schools and handing out free marijuana to the kiddies.
Peak Warming Man said:
All I know is if the Greens hold the balance of power in the lower house after the election well have paedophiles grooming our kids in schools and handing out free marijuana to the kiddies.
Well, marijuana is green & organic.
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
Stupidity aside, where’d the inheritance tax idea come from? The fake greens and the ALP both state they have no policy or plan for such a thing.
Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
Like the IRA & the Real IRA.
Not going into that one.
If you Binge on “inheritance tax in Australia” (without quotes), the first page has no mention of party politics.
If you Google you get first hit a link to the Labor Party site, saying that rumours they will introduce an inheritance tax are just Lib Party lies.
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Clive Palmer probably.
Assuming by “fake greens” you mean The Greens, who are the real greens?
There aren’t any in Aus politics at the moment, just some socialists using the name afaict.
In spite of the popularity of the rightist watermelon meme, as far as I can see, that’s just crap.
You forgot the Tree Tories.
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:There aren’t any in Aus politics at the moment, just some socialists using the name afaict.
In spite of the popularity of the rightist watermelon meme, as far as I can see, that’s just crap.
You forgot the Tree Tories.
I’ll have to look that one up.
I’m a bit out of touch with this politics stuff.
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:In spite of the popularity of the rightist watermelon meme, as far as I can see, that’s just crap.
You forgot the Tree Tories.
I’ll have to look that one up.
I’m a bit out of touch with this politics stuff.
Effluent inner city urbanites who vote green because they care about the environment.
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:In spite of the popularity of the rightist watermelon meme, as far as I can see, that’s just crap.
You forgot the Tree Tories.
I’ll have to look that one up.
I’m a bit out of touch with this politics stuff.
That’s OK I’m here if you need any guidance.
party_pants said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:You forgot the Tree Tories.
I’ll have to look that one up.
I’m a bit out of touch with this politics stuff.
Effluent inner city urbanites who vote green because they care about the environment.
Amusingly, Bob Brown was labelled a tree tory.
poikilotherm said:
party_pants said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I’ll have to look that one up.
I’m a bit out of touch with this politics stuff.
Effluent inner city urbanites who vote green because they care about the environment.
Amusingly, Bob Brown was labelled a tree tory.
Well, the opposite of the out in the wilderness hippy type.
It is not that hypocritical though, urban centres and dense inner city living is probably more efficient in terms of resources consumed than living out in the urban sprawl and making long commutes in the car to get anywhere.
poikilotherm said:
party_pants said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I’ll have to look that one up.
I’m a bit out of touch with this politics stuff.
Effluent inner city urbanites who vote green because they care about the environment.
Amusingly, Bob Brown was labelled a tree tory.
Peak Warming Man said:
All I know is if the Greens hold the balance of power in the lower house after the election well have paedophiles grooming our kids in schools and handing out free marijuana to the kiddies.
You’ve mixed up catholic priests with hippies.
party_pants said:
poikilotherm said:
party_pants said:Effluent inner city urbanites who vote green because they care about the environment.
Amusingly, Bob Brown was labelled a tree tory.
Well, the opposite of the out in the wilderness hippy type.
It is not that hypocritical though, urban centres and dense inner city living is probably more efficient in terms of resources consumed than living out in the urban sprawl and making long commutes in the car to get anywhere.
No, inner city populations consume more and are less efficient than those in the burbs.
“Yet despite the lower environmental impacts associated with less car use, inner city households outstrip the rest of Australia in every other category of consumption. Even in the area of housing, the opportunities for relatively efficient, compact living appear to be overwhelmed by the energy and water demands of modern urban living, such as air conditioning, spa baths, down lighting and luxury electronics and appliances, as well as by a higher proportion of individuals living alone or in small households.
In each state and territory, the centre of the capital city is the area with the highest environmental impacts, followed by the inner suburban areas. Rural and regional areas tend to have noticeably lower levels of consumption.”
The thing I’m sure about in the polls is how they adjust for age. Since most of the polling is done via calling landlines it does tend to skew towards people that use one. Which tends to be older people, in general.
party_pants said:
The thing I’m sure about in the polls is how they adjust for age. Since most of the polling is done via calling landlines it does tend to skew towards people that use one. Which tends to be older people, in general.
party_pants said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:You forgot the Tree Tories.
I’ll have to look that one up.
I’m a bit out of touch with this politics stuff.
Effluent inner city urbanites who vote green because they care about the environment.
OK, that makes me a Tree Tory with watermelon tendencies, or possibly vice versa.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Peak Warming Man said:
All I know is if the Greens hold the balance of power in the lower house after the election well have paedophiles grooming our kids in schools and handing out free marijuana to the kiddies.
You’ve mixed up catholic priests with hippies.
As much as this response is amusing it is gratifying that PWM’s bigoted bullshit was ignored for the hate speech it is.
We can all be thankful that PWM will leave this Earth miserable and alone having never known the unconditional love shared by parents and their kids which lets us accept each other despite our faults and differences in a way that only a true Christian would understand.
Here it is in capitals: PWM YOU CAN OFFICIALLLY FOAD as far as i am concerned.
Oh my goodness. The interpretive dance candidate is in my electorate!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PO-TleNQCfM
buffy said:
Oh my goodness. The interpretive dance candidate is in my electorate!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PO-TleNQCfM
VOTE 1 and vote often.
buffy said:
Oh my goodness. The interpretive dance candidate is in my electorate!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PO-TleNQCfM
Wish he was here.
He’d have my vote for sure.
RIP Bob Hawke
The excitement of Tony Abbott losing?
Great PM .
I Hope Peter Dutton Leader of the Nazi SS Loses Tomorrow. !!!
Tau.Neutrino said:
I Hope Peter Dutton Leader of the Nazi SS Loses Tomorrow. !!!
The Rev Dodgson said:
buffy said:Oh my goodness. The interpretive dance candidate is in my electorate!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PO-TleNQCfM
Wish he was here.
He’d have my vote for sure.
Well, he will be above Dan Tehan. And it’s easy to work out who gets last – we’ve got a UAP candidate. And thinking about it, I could vote for him, because his votes will go to second preferences here. This is just soooo Liberal it amn’t funny.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I Hope Peter Dutton Leader of the Nazi SS Loses Tomorrow. !!!
You know, if you call these people nazis then you really need to come up with another name for nazis.
It’s just fucking ridiculous.
sibeen said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I Hope Peter Dutton Leader of the Nazi SS Loses Tomorrow. !!!
You know, if you call these people nazis then you really need to come up with another name for nazis.
It’s just fucking ridiculous.
hitlerites?
sibeen said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I Hope Peter Dutton Leader of the Nazi SS Loses Tomorrow. !!!
You know, if you call these people nazis then you really need to come up with another name for nazis.
It’s just fucking ridiculous.
fascisisitas _ little facisists ??
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
You know, if you call these people nazis then you really need to come up with another name for nazis.
It’s just fucking ridiculous.
fascisisitas _ little facisists ??
fascistinos?
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
You know, if you call these people nazis then you really need to come up with another name for nazis.
It’s just fucking ridiculous.
fascisisitas _ little facisists ??
It annoys me big time. I cannot stand Dutton, but to put a nazi uniform on him is just…WTF. It belittles the evil that the nazis really were.
sibeen said:
party_pants said:
sibeen said:You know, if you call these people nazis then you really need to come up with another name for nazis.
It’s just fucking ridiculous.
fascisisitas _ little facisists ??
It annoys me big time. I cannot stand Dutton, but to put a nazi uniform on him is just…WTF. It belittles the evil that the nazis really were.
^ This
ChrispenEvan said:
party_pants said:
sibeen said:You know, if you call these people nazis then you really need to come up with another name for nazis.
It’s just fucking ridiculous.
fascisisitas _ little facisists ??
fascistinos?
something along those lines…
sibeen said:
party_pants said:
sibeen said:You know, if you call these people nazis then you really need to come up with another name for nazis.
It’s just fucking ridiculous.
fascisisitas _ little facisists ??
It annoys me big time. I cannot stand Dutton, but to put a nazi uniform on him is just…WTF. It belittles the evil that the nazis really were.
I use RWNJ.
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
party_pants said:fascisisitas _ little facisists ??
It annoys me big time. I cannot stand Dutton, but to put a nazi uniform on him is just…WTF. It belittles the evil that the nazis really were.
^ This
This is getting ridiculous.
It’s starting to look like I actually agree with sibeen on lots of things.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:It annoys me big time. I cannot stand Dutton, but to put a nazi uniform on him is just…WTF. It belittles the evil that the nazis really were.
^ This
This is getting ridiculous.
It’s starting to look like I actually agree with sibeen on lots of things.
Yeah I think sibeen has mellowed in his old age 😛
Divine Angel said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:^ This
This is getting ridiculous.
It’s starting to look like I actually agree with sibeen on lots of things.
Yeah I think sibeen has mellowed in his old age 😛
It’s probably the bursitis acting up.
sibeen said:
It annoys me big time. I cannot stand Dutton, but to put a nazi uniform on him is just…WTF. It belittles the evil that the nazis really were.
You’re right. It trivialises what the Nazis were and did. It suggests that they’re just a meme or a trope to be employed to satisfy a vitriolic whim, it plays down the institutionalised and legitmised evil that they were.
It eases the path for tolerating their return.
Divine Angel said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:^ This
This is getting ridiculous.
It’s starting to look like I actually agree with sibeen on lots of things.
Yeah I think sibeen has mellowed in his old age 😛
yes, he seems to have become a lot softer and gentler soul.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Is that supposed to be clever?
FWIW I agree with those saying the Nazi caricatures are not helpful.
Unless they’re done in relation to Fraser Anning, who seems to be the real deal.
No one seems to reference Godwin in these cases any more but it still applies…
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:It annoys me big time. I cannot stand Dutton, but to put a nazi uniform on him is just…WTF. It belittles the evil that the nazis really were.
^ This
This is getting ridiculous.
It’s starting to look like I actually agree with sibeen on lots of things.
Soon you’ll be reading ‘The Guardian’.
furious said:
- FWIW I agree with those saying the Nazi caricatures are not helpful.
No one seems to reference Godwin in these cases any more but it still applies…
Invoking Godwin is as silly as the nazi accusation.
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Is that supposed to be clever?
Fun, Its supposed to be Fun
but seeing as nearly everyone disagrees with my sense of humour, I will go and listen to music on youtube !
I’m not going to share it either, so there.
Bubblecar said:
FWIW I agree with those saying the Nazi caricatures are not helpful.Unless they’re done in relation to Fraser Anning, who seems to be the real deal.
Fraser Anning
him too
If you say so…
furious said:
- Invoking Godwin is as silly as the nazi accusation.
If you say so…
“He’s a nazi” “That’s a Godwin!” Is just two people telling each other to shut up.
The way i see it is “thats a godwin” is just another way to say “youre a moron”. Bcause, more often than not, the person splashing around nazi accusations is a moron…
I hope Tony Abbott, Peter Dutton and Fraser Anning all lose.
Tau.Neutrino said:
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Is that supposed to be clever?
Fun, Its supposed to be Fun
but seeing as nearly everyone disagrees with my sense of humour, I will go and listen to music on youtube !
I’m not going to share it either, so there.
You’ve ignored the First Rule of comedy writing:
WAWLA
What Are We Laughing At?
When you write a joke, a line, a pun, whatever, ask yourself What Are We Laughing At?
If you can’t answer that confidently, if you aren’t sure, or if you aren’t comfortable with the answer, then it’s probably not a good item.
I can’t see how this passes that test.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Don’t quit your day job, Tau.
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
captain_spalding said:Is that supposed to be clever?
Fun, Its supposed to be Fun
but seeing as nearly everyone disagrees with my sense of humour, I will go and listen to music on youtube !
I’m not going to share it either, so there.
You’ve ignored the First Rule of comedy writing:
WAWLA
What Are We Laughing At?
When you write a joke, a line, a pun, whatever, ask yourself What Are We Laughing At?
If you can’t answer that confidently, if you aren’t sure, or if you aren’t comfortable with the answer, then it’s probably not a good item.
I can’t see how this passes that test.
I don’t recall learning that in the Boris School of Friday Funnies.
captain_spalding said:
You’ve ignored the First Rule of comedy writing:
WAWLA
What Are We Laughing At?
When you write a joke, a line, a pun, whatever, ask yourself What Are We Laughing At?
If you can’t answer that confidently, if you aren’t sure, or if you aren’t comfortable with the answer, then it’s probably not a good item.
I can’t see how this passes that test.
Takes notes.
I’m a failure at comedy.
Oh well, I laughed.
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:Fun, Its supposed to be Fun
but seeing as nearly everyone disagrees with my sense of humour, I will go and listen to music on youtube !
I’m not going to share it either, so there.
You’ve ignored the First Rule of comedy writing:
WAWLA
What Are We Laughing At?
When you write a joke, a line, a pun, whatever, ask yourself What Are We Laughing At?
If you can’t answer that confidently, if you aren’t sure, or if you aren’t comfortable with the answer, then it’s probably not a good item.
I can’t see how this passes that test.
I don’t recall learning that in the Boris School of Friday Funnies.
Hehehehe.
drumroll
OK, I’m announcing this elections prize for the GOLDEN RAZZIE, and the name is actually appropriate.
It was a hard task, so many right wing nutters who well outnumbered so many left wing nutters, so many just nutters, but the major prize goes to…
drumroll
Dr Isaac Golden – World Authority on Homoeopathic Immunisation and the #1 candidate for teh Health Australia Party running for the senate in the great state of Victoria.
Congratulations Isaac Golden
wild applause
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
It annoys me big time. I cannot stand Dutton, but to put a nazi uniform on him is just…WTF. It belittles the evil that the nazis really were.^ This
This is getting ridiculous.
It’s starting to look like I actually agree with sibeen on lots of things.
Soon you’ll be reading ‘The Guardian’.
actually it’s all quite banal so no, watch it
sibeen said:
drumrollOK, I’m announcing this elections prize for the GOLDEN RAZZIE, and the name is actually appropriate.
It was a hard task, so many right wing nutters who well outnumbered so many left wing nutters, so many just nutters, but the major prize goes to…
drumroll
Dr Isaac Golden – World Authority on Homoeopathic Immunisation and the #1 candidate for teh Health Australia Party running for the senate in the great state of Victoria.
Congratulations Isaac Golden
wild applause
Oh cmon, surely the Pirate party is sillier, though I base that opinion totally on its name not knowing a thing about them.
sibeen said:
drumrollOK, I’m announcing this elections prize for the GOLDEN RAZZIE, and the name is actually appropriate.
It was a hard task, so many right wing nutters who well outnumbered so many left wing nutters, so many just nutters, but the major prize goes to…
drumroll
Dr Isaac Golden – World Authority on Homoeopathic Immunisation and the #1 candidate for teh Health Australia Party running for the senate in the great state of Victoria.
Congratulations Isaac Golden
wild applause
The Health Party should be deregistered for misleading by name.
Still thinking about which parties to list 5 and 6 above the line here.
AwesomeO said:
sibeen said:
drumrollOK, I’m announcing this elections prize for the GOLDEN RAZZIE, and the name is actually appropriate.
It was a hard task, so many right wing nutters who well outnumbered so many left wing nutters, so many just nutters, but the major prize goes to…
drumroll
Dr Isaac Golden – World Authority on Homoeopathic Immunisation and the #1 candidate for teh Health Australia Party running for the senate in the great state of Victoria.
Congratulations Isaac Golden
wild applause
Oh cmon, surely the Pirate party is sillier, though I base that opinion totally on its name not knowing a thing about them.
I was actually thinking Pirate Party and the Socialist Alliance.
AwesomeO said:
Oh cmon, surely the Pirate party is sillier, though I base that opinion totally on its name not knowing a thing about them.
They’ve actually grown up quite a bit. You should look them up – Pirate Party Australia
AwesomeO said:
sibeen said:
drumrollOK, I’m announcing this elections prize for the GOLDEN RAZZIE, and the name is actually appropriate.
It was a hard task, so many right wing nutters who well outnumbered so many left wing nutters, so many just nutters, but the major prize goes to…
drumroll
Dr Isaac Golden – World Authority on Homoeopathic Immunisation and the #1 candidate for teh Health Australia Party running for the senate in the great state of Victoria.
Congratulations Isaac Golden
wild applause
Oh cmon, surely the Pirate party is sillier, though I base that opinion totally on its name not knowing a thing about them.
Actually the Pirate party policies are quite sane and will they be quite high at the top of the ticket.
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:This is getting ridiculous.
It’s starting to look like I actually agree with sibeen on lots of things.
Soon you’ll be reading ‘The Guardian’.
actually it’s all quite banal so no, watch it
Your diction is getting a little awry of late.
It was so hard to get that far, it would have been easier to list the top six worst options…
There ought to be a Party Pie Party.
Dedicated to improving the generally low standard of Australian party pies.
Party pies aren’t supposed to be top shelf nosh, that would be silly…
Bubblecar said:
There ought to be a Party Pie Party.Dedicated to improving the generally low standard of Australian party pies.
What’s your beef with party pies now?
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Soon you’ll be reading ‘The Guardian’.
actually it’s all quite banal so no, watch it
Your diction is getting a little awry of late.
all they’re sayin’ is, gently gently, reset the normal a few steps to the right
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
There ought to be a Party Pie Party.Dedicated to improving the generally low standard of Australian party pies.
What’s your beef with party pies now?
Their filling is usually lower quality than normal pies.
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
There ought to be a Party Pie Party.Dedicated to improving the generally low standard of Australian party pies.
What’s your beef with party pies now?
Too much pastry.
mostly because he doesn’t get invited to those sort of parties…
Bubblecar said:
There ought to be a Party Pie Party.Dedicated to improving the generally low standard of Australian party pies.
and more different types of pies
furious said:
- What’s your beef with party pies now?
mostly because he doesn’t get invited to those sort of parties…
‘u don’t mince ‘ur words do ‘u
Tau.Neutrino said:
Bubblecar said:
There ought to be a Party Pie Party.Dedicated to improving the generally low standard of Australian party pies.
and more different types of pies
like magpies
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
There ought to be a Party Pie Party.Dedicated to improving the generally low standard of Australian party pies.
What’s your beef with party pies now?
Their filling is usually lower quality than normal pies.
We want better party pies now..
sibeen said:
drumrollOK, I’m announcing this elections prize for the GOLDEN RAZZIE, and the name is actually appropriate.
It was a hard task, so many right wing nutters who well outnumbered so many left wing nutters, so many just nutters, but the major prize goes to…
drumroll
Dr Isaac Golden – World Authority on Homoeopathic Immunisation and the #1 candidate for teh Health Australia Party running for the senate in the great state of Victoria.
Congratulations Isaac Golden
wild applause
I noticed that name before when I was writing up my cheat sheet for tomorrow morning. I refuse how to vote cards on the basis that I have my own list, thank you. Actually finding enough Senate candidates to count beyond 12 is not that easy…
buffy said:
sibeen said:
drumrollOK, I’m announcing this elections prize for the GOLDEN RAZZIE, and the name is actually appropriate.
It was a hard task, so many right wing nutters who well outnumbered so many left wing nutters, so many just nutters, but the major prize goes to…
drumroll
Dr Isaac Golden – World Authority on Homoeopathic Immunisation and the #1 candidate for teh Health Australia Party running for the senate in the great state of Victoria.
Congratulations Isaac Golden
wild applause
I noticed that name before when I was writing up my cheat sheet for tomorrow morning. I refuse how to vote cards on the basis that I have my own list, thank you. Actually finding enough Senate candidates to count beyond 12 is not that easy…
Yeah, I’m officially pissed off with this only counting to 12 rubbish. I want my GOLDEN RAZZIE to not count, if you know what I mean :)
sibeen said:
buffy said:
sibeen said:
drumrollOK, I’m announcing this elections prize for the GOLDEN RAZZIE, and the name is actually appropriate.
It was a hard task, so many right wing nutters who well outnumbered so many left wing nutters, so many just nutters, but the major prize goes to…
drumroll
Dr Isaac Golden – World Authority on Homoeopathic Immunisation and the #1 candidate for teh Health Australia Party running for the senate in the great state of Victoria.
Congratulations Isaac Golden
wild applause
I noticed that name before when I was writing up my cheat sheet for tomorrow morning. I refuse how to vote cards on the basis that I have my own list, thank you. Actually finding enough Senate candidates to count beyond 12 is not that easy…
Yeah, I’m officially pissed off with this only counting to 12 rubbish. I want my GOLDEN RAZZIE to not count, if you know what I mean :)
I intend to count beyond 12, but I’m happy enough not to have to count to 132 or something like we did on one occasion. I don’t vote above the line and I never have….this time I would not be able to. I couldn’t find 6 parties to go with.
What’s ‘homeopathic immunisation’ any way?
I’m presuming that it means that if you don’t receive any vaccines at all, then you will (of course) be immune to all diseases.
Which would explain why smallpox killed absolutely no-one until Edward Jenner came along.
buffy said:
sibeen said:
buffy said:I noticed that name before when I was writing up my cheat sheet for tomorrow morning. I refuse how to vote cards on the basis that I have my own list, thank you. Actually finding enough Senate candidates to count beyond 12 is not that easy…
Yeah, I’m officially pissed off with this only counting to 12 rubbish. I want my GOLDEN RAZZIE to not count, if you know what I mean :)
I intend to count beyond 12, but I’m happy enough not to have to count to 132 or something like we did on one occasion. I don’t vote above the line and I never have….this time I would not be able to. I couldn’t find 6 parties to go with.
ROFL.
Above the line you’d be an impossible conundrum. I still intend to put Ricky at #1 but there’s no way I’d put his party high on the list.
sibeen said:
buffy said:
sibeen said:Yeah, I’m officially pissed off with this only counting to 12 rubbish. I want my GOLDEN RAZZIE to not count, if you know what I mean :)
I intend to count beyond 12, but I’m happy enough not to have to count to 132 or something like we did on one occasion. I don’t vote above the line and I never have….this time I would not be able to. I couldn’t find 6 parties to go with.
ROFL.
Above the line you’d be an impossible conundrum. I still intend to put Ricky at #1 but there’s no way I’d put his party high on the list.
There’s supposed to be an ‘in’ in there somewhere.
buffy said:
I intend to count beyond 12, but I’m happy enough not to have to count to 132 or something like we did on one occasion. I don’t vote above the line and I never have….this time I would not be able to. I couldn’t find 6 parties to go with.
Hey, that’s an idea. I’ll have a look at how many each have below the line. Maybe I can find 12 without having to get into the micro parties like I’ll have to do with 5 and 6 above the line.
party_pants said:
buffy said:I intend to count beyond 12, but I’m happy enough not to have to count to 132 or something like we did on one occasion. I don’t vote above the line and I never have….this time I would not be able to. I couldn’t find 6 parties to go with.
Hey, that’s an idea. I’ll have a look at how many each have below the line. Maybe I can find 12 without having to get into the micro parties like I’ll have to do with 5 and 6 above the line.
As I’ve seen said here … you are welcome!
:)
I like to do the individuals in a party in reverse order below the line because you know their actual order isn’t based on merit…
furious said:
- Hey, that’s an idea. I’ll have a look at how many each have below the line. Maybe I can find 12 without having to get into the micro parties like I’ll have to do with 5 and 6 above the line.
I like to do the individuals in a party in reverse order below the line because you know their actual order isn’t based on merit…
Maybe I can find 12 from micro-parties that have better policies than labour, liberal and greens. It looks promising. There are at least four micro-parties in Vic that have better suites of policies than all three of the big ones.
And don’t forget the science party in NSW and Nick Xenophon’s party in SA.
mollwollfumble said:
furious said:
- Hey, that’s an idea. I’ll have a look at how many each have below the line. Maybe I can find 12 without having to get into the micro parties like I’ll have to do with 5 and 6 above the line.
I like to do the individuals in a party in reverse order below the line because you know their actual order isn’t based on merit…
Maybe I can find 12 from micro-parties that have better policies than labour, liberal and greens. It looks promising. There are at least four micro-parties in Vic that have better suites of policies than all three of the big ones.
And don’t forget the science party in NSW and Nick Xenophon’s party in SA.
As long as you don’t vote for Clive. I might have the track you down and remove your finger-nails with some pliers if you did.
furious said:
- Hey, that’s an idea. I’ll have a look at how many each have below the line. Maybe I can find 12 without having to get into the micro parties like I’ll have to do with 5 and 6 above the line.
I like to do the individuals in a party in reverse order below the line because you know their actual order isn’t based on merit…
Well of course, I’ve been doing that for yonks.
Local electorate reps. UA, G, L, L, AJ, with RUA last.
Vic senate. Australian Workers, Democrats, Pirate, Liberal Democrats, Small Business, Secular, UA, G
Huge change for me from previous years.
mollwollfumble said:
furious said:
- Hey, that’s an idea. I’ll have a look at how many each have below the line. Maybe I can find 12 without having to get into the micro parties like I’ll have to do with 5 and 6 above the line.
I like to do the individuals in a party in reverse order below the line because you know their actual order isn’t based on merit…
Well of course, I’ve been doing that for yonks.
Local electorate reps. UA, G, L, L, AJ, with RUA last.
Vic senate. Australian Workers, Democrats, Pirate, Liberal Democrats, Small Business, Secular, UA, G
Huge change for me from previous years.
Hmm. What about Voteflux and Republican for the senate?
I like the concept of Voteflux. Even a single senate seat would shake up the entire Australian political system, and I’d be enormously delighted if they held the balance of power in the senate. You see, a Voteflux senator can never be be bribed or blackmailed.
Republican is all talk and no action. Good in concept but all they do is hold cocktail parties and moan about how bad old blighty is.
Just doing my research for the Senate.
I wish the press/TV would give at least some coverage to the minor parties not let by Hanson and Palmer.
What do we know about:
Australian People’s Party- they claim to be centrist, are they really?
Health Australia Party
Together Party
?
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just doing my research for the Senate.I wish the press/TV would give at least some coverage to the minor parties not let by Hanson and Palmer.
What do we know about:
Australian People’s Party- they claim to be centrist, are they really?
Health Australia Party
Together Party
?
I did a bit of looking up the last couple of days.
Health Party are the opposite of the name – anti vaccines, fluoride in drinking water etc.
party_pants said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just doing my research for the Senate.I wish the press/TV would give at least some coverage to the minor parties not let by Hanson and Palmer.
What do we know about:
Australian People’s Party- they claim to be centrist, are they really?
Health Australia Party
Together Party
?
I did a bit of looking up the last couple of days.
Health Party are the opposite of the name – anti vaccines, fluoride in drinking water etc.
Health Party say they are not anti-vaccine, but nonetheless look dodgy enough to be excluded.
The Together Party sound alright on Wikipedia.
… anyway I should bugger off and vote now.
So Australian Conservatives is Bernadi, ‘nuff said about them.
The Rev Dodgson said:
So Australian Conservatives is Bernadi, ‘nuff said about them.
Thought you would have known that but anyway.
Independent for Climate Action Now look OK.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just doing my research for the Senate.I wish the press/TV would give at least some coverage to the minor parties not let by Hanson and Palmer.
What do we know about:
Australian People’s Party- they claim to be centrist, are they really?
Health Australia Party
Together Party
?
Health Australia party – their candidate has earned my last on senate ticket prize.
sibeen said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just doing my research for the Senate.I wish the press/TV would give at least some coverage to the minor parties not let by Hanson and Palmer.
What do we know about:
Australian People’s Party- they claim to be centrist, are they really?
Health Australia Party
Together Party
?
Health Australia party – their candidate has earned my last on senate ticket prize.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/10/australian-election-2019-full-list-of-micro-parties-standing-in-the-senate
sibeen said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just doing my research for the Senate.I wish the press/TV would give at least some coverage to the minor parties not let by Hanson and Palmer.
What do we know about:
Australian People’s Party- they claim to be centrist, are they really?
Health Australia Party
Together Party
?
Health Australia party – their candidate has earned my last on senate ticket prize.
Worse than Anning and The Rise Up Australia Party?
Really?
The Rev Dodgson said:
sibeen said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just doing my research for the Senate.I wish the press/TV would give at least some coverage to the minor parties not let by Hanson and Palmer.
What do we know about:
Australian People’s Party- they claim to be centrist, are they really?
Health Australia Party
Together Party
?
Health Australia party – their candidate has earned my last on senate ticket prize.
Worse than Anning and The Rise Up Australia Party?
Really?
Yeah. My hope being that there is so many minor right wing nutters that their vote will be diluted across the lot. The anti-vaxxers are dangerous.
In Qld senate, the party who earned last place on my form were the Involuntary Medication Objectors (Vaccines/Fluoride). All the racist nobber parties were just before that.
Did the deed.
Had a democracy sausage, as did my lad, though he can’t vote.
And now the waiting game.
dv said:
Did the deed.Had a democracy sausage, as did my lad, though he can’t vote.
And now the waiting game.
I woke up this morning and thought the results would be plastered all over the intertubes. Very confusing when you get your days wrong :(
dv said:
Did the deed.Had a democracy sausage, as did my lad, though he can’t vote.
And now the waiting game.
I’m looking forward to a boilover tonight, bookies and pollsters proved wrong.
A glorious come from behind victory that will live long in Australian folk lore.
rubs hands
I’m in a marginal seat full of old people. I predict we’ll swing back to Labor.
Divine Angel said:
I’m in a marginal seat full of old people. I predict we’ll swing back to Labor.
I’m in the marginal seat of Maribyrnong. I suspect Shorten may just scrape in.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Did the deed.Had a democracy sausage, as did my lad, though he can’t vote.
And now the waiting game.
I’m looking forward to a boilover tonight, bookies and pollsters proved wrong.
A glorious come from behind victory that will live long in Australian folk lore.
rubs hands
It’s not impossible: stranger things have happened. They’d just need to fall over the line in a number of those close seats. I’d give the Blues about a 10% chance from here. I think majority government is a bit beyond them, 76 seats is very unlikely, but if they can get to 73 seats they will likely find support from Katter and a couple of indies.
sibeen said:
Divine Angel said:
I’m in a marginal seat full of old people. I predict we’ll swing back to Labor.
I’m in the marginal seat of Maribyrnong. I suspect Shorten may just scrape in.
I’m in Stirling. Went 56% Lib last time. I’m expecting a strong swing to ALP but I expect the Coalition to hold on to it.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Did the deed.Had a democracy sausage, as did my lad, though he can’t vote.
And now the waiting game.
I’m looking forward to a boilover tonight, bookies and pollsters proved wrong.
A glorious come from behind victory that will live long in Australian folk lore.
rubs hands
With all the catholic support I’m sure they quite like coming from behind.
Democracy sausage has been had. With (cooked) onions. There was a bacon and egg roll option. Perhaps it could have been egg on toast for Fraser Anning. Hopefully.
I numbered every square below the line. Did my homework to see what nice benign sounding parties were actually proper wanker parties. Too many as it turned out.


From ABC Tas.
I went to Snug. I voted. I hope it works.
Rushes in
Has Antony Green called the election results?
Tau.Neutrino said:
Rushes inHas Antony Green called the election results?
No.
I’ve already been through one mistake thinking it was over when I woke up today.
I bought beer for tonight. Will be toasting Hawke’s memory, and either drowning my sorrows or celebrating. Or being morose over another hung parliament.
party_pants said:
WRONG.
ruby said:
I bought beer for tonight. Will be toasting Hawke’s memory, and either drowning my sorrows or celebrating. Or being morose over another hung parliament.
Could you send me a fb message when the results come in,please?
Divine Angel said:
wow that desperation
post to WeChat please
kii said:
ruby said:
I bought beer for tonight. Will be toasting Hawke’s memory, and either drowning my sorrows or celebrating. Or being morose over another hung parliament.
Could you send me a fb message when the results come in,please?
Yup. There may be ranting involved, I have no faith at this point.
ruby said:
kii said:
ruby said:
I bought beer for tonight. Will be toasting Hawke’s memory, and either drowning my sorrows or celebrating. Or being morose over another hung parliament.
Could you send me a fb message when the results come in,please?
Yup. There may be ranting involved, I have no faith at this point.
Ooo..hopefully drunken ranting!
party_pants said:
Ta.
kii said:
party_pants said:
WRONG.
yet it was somehow delicious
There was a P&C Democracy Sausage Tent at the school. I got my first ever Democracy Sausage.
:)
Michael V said:
There was a P&C Democracy Sausage Tent at the school. I got my first ever Democracy Sausage.:)
I hope you enjoyed it.
No democracy sausages here.
I’ll just have to live vicariously through other people’s tales of democracy sausages.
Bubblecar said:
Michael V said:
There was a P&C Democracy Sausage Tent at the school. I got my first ever Democracy Sausage.:)
I hope you enjoyed it.
No democracy sausages here.
I’ll just have to live vicariously through other people’s tales of democracy sausages.
You could get out the frypan and cook up one specially.
Michael V said:
There was a P&C Democracy Sausage Tent at the school. I got my first ever Democracy Sausage.:)
The P&C had coffee and cakes. The Fireys had sausages. I’m sorry. I did not partake.
Michael V said:
There was a P&C Democracy Sausage Tent at the school. I got my first ever Democracy Sausage.:)
Yay. Bread or hot dog roll?
kii said:
Michael V said:
There was a P&C Democracy Sausage Tent at the school. I got my first ever Democracy Sausage.:)
Yay. Bread or hot dog roll?
White bread, of course.
party_pants said:
kii said:
party_pants said:
WRONG.
yet it was somehow delicious
According to Steve it has to be white bread. He wrote a very detailed post on fb about it.
Michael V said:
kii said:
Michael V said:
There was a P&C Democracy Sausage Tent at the school. I got my first ever Democracy Sausage.:)
Yay. Bread or hot dog roll?
White bread, of course.
Excellent
kii said:
party_pants said:
kii said:WRONG.
yet it was somehow delicious
According to Steve it has to be white bread. He wrote a very detailed post on fb about it.
regional cuisine and all that.
the bun is traditional in WA rather than the slice of bread.
We don’t have such fripperies around here. When you’ve just automatically voted Liberal since Malcolm Fraser got in (1955), you don’t need the cake and circuses….
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
Michael V said:
There was a P&C Democracy Sausage Tent at the school. I got my first ever Democracy Sausage.:)
I hope you enjoyed it.
No democracy sausages here.
I’ll just have to live vicariously through other people’s tales of democracy sausages.
You could get out the frypan and cook up one specially.
No sausages in the house except for 1 x saveloy which is the wrong kind of sausage for this gig.
party_pants said:
kii said:
party_pants said:yet it was somehow delicious
According to Steve it has to be white bread. He wrote a very detailed post on fb about it.
regional cuisine and all that.
the bun is traditional in WA rather than the slice of bread.
SPLITTERS!
buffy said:
We don’t have such fripperies around here. When you’ve just automatically voted Liberal since Malcolm Fraser got in (1955), you don’t need the cake and circuses….
It s a major fundraiser for our fireys.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-18/federal-election-2019-chisholm-labor-lodges-aec-poster-complaint/11126232
I know someone pointed this out a short time ago. But I agree with the union fellow – it’s deceptive conduct.
has Antony called it yet?
kii said:
Probably the last point is true, but the preceding points are just wrong.
Both leaders of the two major parties are frequently mocked for their appearance, dress, and manor of speech.
Divine Angel said:
If that is true, it is both devious and stupid.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
If that is true, it is both devious and stupid.
It seems to be true. Several people have reported that, and similar signs, to the AEC.
ChrispenEvan said:
has Antony called it yet?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-09/has-antony-green-called-the-election-yet/11095794
Divine Angel said:
ChrispenEvan said:
has Antony called it yet?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-09/has-antony-green-called-the-election-yet/11095794
Give him a chance.
I wonder if he takes special precautions to ensure he’s fit and well for election night.
Be disastrous if he came down with manflu or gastro or suchlike.
party_pants said:

ChrispenEvan said:
Who dat?
or…. you took a picture of some random eating a hot dog at your polling station?
party_pants said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Who dat?
or…. you took a picture of some random eating a hot dog at your polling station?
James Jansson – Science Party for Kingsford Smith
party_pants said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Who dat?
or…. you took a picture of some random eating a hot dog at your polling station?
party_pants said:
Good dog.

Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
Good dog.
The dog leans to the left.
Tamb said:
party_pants said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Who dat?
or…. you took a picture of some random eating a hot dog at your polling station?
No democracy sausage at ours. Council needed 6 weeks notice & the election was with 5 weeks notice. Bah! Humbug!
What. The council needs six weeks notice to do what? Issue a license?
It’s worth signing up to Twitter just to read this tweet. The first letter of every tweet in the read spells a secret message.
https://twitter.com/mehreenfaruqi/status/1129250807205879809?s=21
(Spoiler: it spells ENGADINE MACCAS)
https://www.pedestrian.tv/news/engadine-maccas-plaque-doo-doo-ass/
sibeen said:
Tamb said:
party_pants said:Who dat?
or…. you took a picture of some random eating a hot dog at your polling station?
No democracy sausage at ours. Council needed 6 weeks notice & the election was with 5 weeks notice. Bah! Humbug!What. The council needs six weeks notice to do what? Issue a license?
Queensland, the only country in the world where you need a sausage licence.
Divine Angel said:
It’s worth signing up to Twitter just to read this tweet. The first letter of every tweet in the read spells a secret message.https://twitter.com/mehreenfaruqi/status/1129250807205879809?s=21
(Spoiler: it spells ENGADINE MACCAS)
https://www.pedestrian.tv/news/engadine-maccas-plaque-doo-doo-ass/
Damn, here I was just about to sign up to twitter and you went and spoiled it.
Divine Angel said:
It’s worth signing up to Twitter just to read this tweet. The first letter of every tweet in the read spells a secret message.https://twitter.com/mehreenfaruqi/status/1129250807205879809?s=21
(Spoiler: it spells ENGADINE MACCAS)
https://www.pedestrian.tv/news/engadine-maccas-plaque-doo-doo-ass/
I’m not signing away my life for such meagre reward.
sibeen said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s worth signing up to Twitter just to read this tweet. The first letter of every tweet in the read spells a secret message.https://twitter.com/mehreenfaruqi/status/1129250807205879809?s=21
(Spoiler: it spells ENGADINE MACCAS)
https://www.pedestrian.tv/news/engadine-maccas-plaque-doo-doo-ass/
Damn, here I was just about to sign up to twitter and you went and spoiled it.
I knew no one was actually gonna sign up.
sibeen said:
Tamb said:
party_pants said:Who dat?
or…. you took a picture of some random eating a hot dog at your polling station?
No democracy sausage at ours. Council needed 6 weeks notice & the election was with 5 weeks notice. Bah! Humbug!What. The council needs six weeks notice to do what? Issue a license?
Yes. I suspect that they didn’t want to do it.
The venue for the poling booth was changed from the advertised State high school to the State primary school.
I was told that there was one very small notice at the high school but I didn’t see it when I went thee. Even the police weren’t aware of the change.
Tamb said:
sibeen said:
Tamb said:No democracy sausage at ours. Council needed 6 weeks notice & the election was with 5 weeks notice. Bah! Humbug!
What. The council needs six weeks notice to do what? Issue a license?
Yes. I suspect that they didn’t want to do it.
The venue for the poling booth was changed from the advertised State high school to the State primary school.
I was told that there was one very small notice at the high school but I didn’t see it when I went thee. Even the police weren’t aware of the change.
That sounds dodgy
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Tamb said:No democracy sausage at ours. Council needed 6 weeks notice & the election was with 5 weeks notice. Bah! Humbug!
What. The council needs six weeks notice to do what? Issue a license?
Queensland, the only country in the world where you need a sausage licence.
Pedantically Qld is a State even though we wish it was a country. Anything to get separated from the Socialist Republic of Victoria.
Divine Angel said:
Tamb said:
sibeen said:What. The council needs six weeks notice to do what? Issue a license?
Yes. I suspect that they didn’t want to do it.
The venue for the poling booth was changed from the advertised State high school to the State primary school.
I was told that there was one very small notice at the high school but I didn’t see it when I went thee. Even the police weren’t aware of the change.
That sounds dodgy
thee = there
Tamb said:
sibeen said:
Tamb said:No democracy sausage at ours. Council needed 6 weeks notice & the election was with 5 weeks notice. Bah! Humbug!
What. The council needs six weeks notice to do what? Issue a license?
Yes. I suspect that they didn’t want to do it.
The venue for the poling booth was changed from the advertised State high school to the State primary school.
I was told that there was one very small notice at the high school but I didn’t see it when I went thee. Even the police weren’t aware of the change.
If a council couldn’t arrange a permit in five weeks, with the proviso that someone actually wanted one, I’d be attending the next council meeting and asking WTF?
A google search with just three words – sausage man arrested – turns up some tragic tales.
sibeen said:
Tamb said:
sibeen said:What. The council needs six weeks notice to do what? Issue a license?
Yes. I suspect that they didn’t want to do it.
The venue for the poling booth was changed from the advertised State high school to the State primary school.
I was told that there was one very small notice at the high school but I didn’t see it when I went thee. Even the police weren’t aware of the change.
If a council couldn’t arrange a permit in five weeks, with the proviso that someone actually wanted one, I’d be attending the next council meeting and asking WTF?
Tamb said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:What. The council needs six weeks notice to do what? Issue a license?
Queensland, the only country in the world where you need a sausage licence.
Pedantically Qld is a State even though we wish it was a country. Anything to get separated from the Socialist Republic of Victoria.
North Qld should be its own state
*runs away
Divine Angel said:
Tamb said:
Bubblecar said:Queensland, the only country in the world where you need a sausage licence.
Pedantically Qld is a State even though we wish it was a country. Anything to get separated from the Socialist Republic of Victoria.
North Qld should be its own state
*runs away
I would like to thank The Rev. Dodgson for his contribution to Australia’s democratic system.
btm said:
I would like to thank The Rev. Dodgson for his contribution to Australia’s democratic system.
Scratches head.
Looks around
Who me?
Well thankyou.
Divine Angel said:
Tamb said:
Bubblecar said:Queensland, the only country in the world where you need a sausage licence.
Pedantically Qld is a State even though we wish it was a country. Anything to get separated from the Socialist Republic of Victoria.
North Qld should be its own state
*runs away
Feck yes.
btm said:
I would like to thank The Rev. Dodgson for his contribution to Australia’s democratic system.
How many actual boxes are there under the line?
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
I would like to thank The Rev. Dodgson for his contribution to Australia’s democratic system.
How many actual boxes are there under the line?
Exactly one per candidate.
The Rev Dodgson said:
btm said:
I would like to thank The Rev. Dodgson for his contribution to Australia’s democratic system.
Scratches head.
Looks around
Who me?
Well thankyou.
No, not you. The Rev. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, better known by some as Lewis Carroll, who invented the method of proportional voting we use in Australia. See Dodgson’s method.
btm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
btm said:
I would like to thank The Rev. Dodgson for his contribution to Australia’s democratic system.
Scratches head.
Looks around
Who me?
Well thankyou.
No, not you. The Rev. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, better known by some as Lewis Carroll, who invented the method of proportional voting we use in Australia. See Dodgson’s method.
Ah.
kii said:
Divine Angel said:
Tamb said:Pedantically Qld is a State even though we wish it was a country. Anything to get separated from the Socialist Republic of Victoria.
North Qld should be its own state
*runs away
Feck yes.
Southern boundary at the Cardwell range.
party_pants said:
Here doggie, have this nice bowl of water.
Bubblecar said:
btm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Scratches head.
Looks around
Who me?
Well thankyou.
No, not you. The Rev. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, better known by some as Lewis Carroll, who invented the method of proportional voting we use in Australia. See Dodgson’s method.
Ah.
I’m OK with him. The fecker who invented so called daylight saving, not OK.
btm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
btm said:
I would like to thank The Rev. Dodgson for his contribution to Australia’s democratic system.
Scratches head.
Looks around
Who me?
Well thankyou.
No, not you. The Rev. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, better known by some as Lewis Carroll, who invented the method of proportional voting we use in Australia. See Dodgson’s method.
I really should have known that :)
ChrispenEvan said:
has Antony called it yet?
It’s 3:30.
Should pull the plug on voting and get on with the count. Anyone too apathetic to have cast a vote by now can piss off.
An hour’s sampling of a few booths here and there should be enough for Antony call it for Labor.
Ian said:
ChrispenEvan said:
has Antony called it yet?
It’s 3:30.
Should pull the plug on voting and get on with the count. Anyone too apathetic to have cast a vote by now can piss off.
An hour’s sampling of a few booths here and there should be enough for Antony call it for Labor.
I haven’t voted yet.
Ian said:
Anyone too apathetic to have cast a vote by now can piss off.
Mr Speaker, I second the motion!
Ian said:
ChrispenEvan said:
has Antony called it yet?
It’s 3:30.
Should pull the plug on voting and get on with the count. Anyone too apathetic to have cast a vote by now can piss off.
An hour’s sampling of a few booths here and there should be enough for Antony call it for Labor.
Bet Hillary Clinton thought much the same.
party_pants said:
Ian said:Anyone too apathetic to have cast a vote by now can piss off.Mr Speaker, I second the motion!
Disagree.
For a few more hours we will be free of pollies spouting bs.
Ian said:
ChrispenEvan said:
has Antony called it yet?
It’s 3:30.
Should pull the plug on voting and get on with the count. Anyone too apathetic to have cast a vote by now can piss off.
An hour’s sampling of a few booths here and there should be enough for Antony call it for Labor.
And then we can get on with throwing mud pies at Sauron aka Dark Lord Murdoch and pillorying his minions, Scummo, Dutton, Abbott…
btm said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
btm said:
I would like to thank The Rev. Dodgson for his contribution to Australia’s democratic system.
Scratches head.
Looks around
Who me?
Well thankyou.
No, not you. The Rev. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, better known by some as Lewis Carroll, who invented the method of proportional voting we use in Australia. See Dodgson’s method.
He made obtuse references to it in Alice in Wonderland.
Tamb said:
Bubblecar said:
btm said:No, not you. The Rev. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, better known by some as Lewis Carroll, who invented the method of proportional voting we use in Australia. See Dodgson’s method.
Ah.
I’m OK with him. The fecker who invented so called daylight saving, not OK.
Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:
Bubblecar said:Ah.
I’m OK with him. The fecker who invented so called daylight saving, not OK.
Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
We tried it & rejected it. The other states keep trying to get us to change.
Tamb said:
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:I’m OK with him. The fecker who invented so called daylight saving, not OK.
Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
We tried it & rejected it. The other states keep trying to get us to change.
You’d they’d be more concerned about getting you out of the 80s, but who am I to judge.
Now?
https://www.smh.com.au/federal-election-2019/clive-palmer-volunteer-fined-for-allegedly-exposing-himself-at-polling-place-20190518-p51opm.html
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:
Bubblecar said:Ah.
I’m OK with him. The fecker who invented so called daylight saving, not OK.
Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
The closer you get to the equator the less useful it becomes, in some cases becoming an inconvenience. Really only suits temperate zones in the middle latitudes.
ChrispenEvan said:
https://www.smh.com.au/federal-election-2019/clive-palmer-volunteer-fined-for-allegedly-exposing-himself-at-polling-place-20190518-p51opm.html
not THAT kind of democracy sausage!
party_pants said:
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:I’m OK with him. The fecker who invented so called daylight saving, not OK.
Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
The closer you get to the equator the less useful it becomes, in some cases becoming an inconvenience. Really only suits temperate zones in the middle latitudes.
also high latitudes. worked well in england.
Tamb said:
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:I’m OK with him. The fecker who invented so called daylight saving, not OK.
Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
We tried it & rejected it. The other states keep trying to get us to change.
And they’ve got nothing to show for it, no pool of daylight saved for the future.
Heck you can’t ever buy some on the black market.
It’s a scam and us Queenslanders didn’t fall for it.
ChrispenEvan said:
https://www.smh.com.au/federal-election-2019/clive-palmer-volunteer-fined-for-allegedly-exposing-himself-at-polling-place-20190518-p51opm.html
Why am I not surprised?
party_pants said:
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:I’m OK with him. The fecker who invented so called daylight saving, not OK.
Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
The closer you get to the equator the less useful it becomes, in some cases becoming an inconvenience. Really only suits temperate zones in the middle latitudes.
Peak Warming Man said:
Tamb said:
poikilotherm said:Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
We tried it & rejected it. The other states keep trying to get us to change.
And they’ve got nothing to show for it, no pool of daylight saved for the future.
Heck you can’t ever buy some on the black market.
It’s a scam and us Queenslanders didn’t fall for it.
black market?
Tamb said:
party_pants said:
poikilotherm said:Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
The closer you get to the equator the less useful it becomes, in some cases becoming an inconvenience. Really only suits temperate zones in the middle latitudes.
At last some science!
Sorry, I’ll fuck off for a while and do something useful :)
ChrispenEvan said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Tamb said:We tried it & rejected it. The other states keep trying to get us to change.
And they’ve got nothing to show for it, no pool of daylight saved for the future.
Heck you can’t ever buy some on the black market.
It’s a scam and us Queenslanders didn’t fall for it.
black market?
A black market in daylight. Hmmm. Daylight robbery.
party_pants said:
Tamb said:
party_pants said:The closer you get to the equator the less useful it becomes, in some cases becoming an inconvenience. Really only suits temperate zones in the middle latitudes.
At last some science!Sorry, I’ll fuck off for a while and do something useful :)
I should think so, and try and spend some quality time with your remaining big tow.
kii said:
Now?
*bump *
Peak Warming Man said:
party_pants said:
Tamb said:At last some science!
Sorry, I’ll fuck off for a while and do something useful :)
I should think so, and try and spend some quality time with your remaining big tow.
I’m not a grammar nazi but I’m confused. Did you mean toe?
kii said:
kii said:
Now?
*bump *
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/
Tamb said:
Peak Warming Man said:
party_pants said:Sorry, I’ll fuck off for a while and do something useful :)
I should think so, and try and spend some quality time with your remaining big tow.
I’m not a grammar nazi but I’m confused. Did you mean toe?
Indeed I did, the w being juxtaposition next to the e and the inability of the software to discern from the context that an error may have occurred and flag it for correction if necessary before the pressing of a submit button or similar.
Peak Warming Man said:
Tamb said:
Peak Warming Man said:I should think so, and try and spend some quality time with your remaining big tow.
I’m not a grammar nazi but I’m confused. Did you mean toe?
Indeed I did, the w being juxtaposition next to the e and the inability of the software to discern from the context that an error may have occurred and flag it for correction if necessary before the pressing of a submit button or similar.
Thank you. It now all becomes clear. Sorry for the query.
party_pants said:
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:I’m OK with him. The fecker who invented so called daylight saving, not OK.
Always find it strange people that people that live in a state without daylight saving seem to hate it so much.
The closer you get to the equator the less useful it becomes, in some cases becoming an inconvenience. Really only suits temperate zones in the middle latitudes.
No shit.
And polls close in 3 states so we should have some kind of goods in 40 mins.
This won’t be one of those elections that can be called before polls close in WA…
perhaps
dv said:
And polls close in 3 states so we should have some kind of goods in 40 mins.This won’t be one of those elections that can be called before polls close in WA…
I bet Antony is getting excited.
Could be an unexpected coalition wipe-out. Every single one of them loses their seat.

Bubblecar said:
Could be an unexpected coalition wipe-out. Every single one of them loses their seat.
certainly would find it quite enjoyable
Bubblecar said:
Could be an unexpected coalition wipe-out. Every single one of them loses their seat.
As long as One Nation doesn’t take all their seats, I’m good. Imagine Pauline as PM????
Divine Angel said:
Bubblecar said:
Could be an unexpected coalition wipe-out. Every single one of them loses their seat.
As long as One Nation doesn’t take all their seats, I’m good. Imagine Pauline as PM????
ooohhh the perils…
Here we go.
First results in
We’re winning.
I’ll go to bed now.
Peak Warming Man said:
First results inWe’re winning.
I’ll go to bed now.
too early.
Spot of cancer suited Sinidinos.
Did Penny Wong just refer to Antony as Anthony?
sibeen said:
Did Penny Wong just refer to Antony as Anthony?
I couldn’t tell you.
Who is the candidate not identified? A superhero or dentist?
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:
Did Penny Wong just refer to Antony as Anthony?
I couldn’t tell you.
Turn on your secret telly.
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:
Did Penny Wong just refer to Antony as Anthony?
I couldn’t tell you.
https://iview.abc.net.au/show/abc-live-stream
ChrispenEvan said:
Peak Warming Man said:
First results inWe’re winning.
I’ll go to bed now.
too early.
12:10 dang those huge odds
I’ve got the election going on the telly in the living room and Eurovision going on the pooter in here.
https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2019/05/18/cooper-candidate-unleashes-racist-rant-african-men?fbclid=IwAR3cLqbnv_3riH3ZncHqwKCHZBAPnXAhz4P1KWuALiQ93hCNJB7EQFdCsBc
sibeen said:
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:
Did Penny Wong just refer to Antony as Anthony?
I couldn’t tell you.
https://iview.abc.net.au/show/abc-live-stream
bloody hell, it’s like having a telly!!!!
sarahs mum said:
https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2019/05/18/cooper-candidate-unleashes-racist-rant-african-men?fbclid=IwAR3cLqbnv_3riH3ZncHqwKCHZBAPnXAhz4P1KWuALiQ93hCNJB7EQFdCsBc
Madness with extra cream and a prune on top.
sarahs mum said:
https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2019/05/18/cooper-candidate-unleashes-racist-rant-african-men?fbclid=IwAR3cLqbnv_3riH3ZncHqwKCHZBAPnXAhz4P1KWuALiQ93hCNJB7EQFdCsBc
‘You have to respect me, because I was born here and I’m a teacher. ‘ – Independent candidate in the federal seat of Cooper, Teresa van Lieshout
I used to hate interviewing teachers when i worked for Centrelink. They get so used to ‘always being right’. They’d come in and tell you what they wanted you to do, and how they wanted you to do it, like they were talking to a 10-year -old.
You’d have to point out sometimes that what they wanted was actually illegal, and if we did it, we could both go to gaol.
sibeen said:
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:
Did Penny Wong just refer to Antony as Anthony?
I couldn’t tell you.
https://iview.abc.net.au/show/abc-live-stream
pity, i don’t like crabbe.
I know it’s early, but it don’t look good..

ONP getting 15% in Longman.
Queenslanders…eh.
captain_spalding said:
I know it’s early, but it don’t look good..
I don’t want to see that shit.
Early Labor victory if you want my affection.
If Scomo gets back in there’ll be much unhappiness throughout this sunburnt nation.
Bubblecar said:
captain_spalding said:I know it’s early, but it don’t look good..
I don’t want to see that shit.
Early Labor victory if you want my affection.
If Scomo gets back in there’ll be much unhappiness throughout this sunburnt nation.
I’d move to New Zealand but I can’t afford it.
Bubblecar said:
captain_spalding said:I know it’s early, but it don’t look good..
I don’t want to see that shit.
Early Labor victory if you want my affection.
If Scomo gets back in there’ll be much unhappiness throughout this sunburnt nation.
If scomo gets back in there’s obviously going to be a lot of happiness throughout this sunburnt nation.
With 1.2% of the vote counted, Libs are so far holding onto my seat of Petrie.
Bubblecar said:
captain_spalding said:I know it’s early, but it don’t look good..
I don’t want to see that shit.
Early Labor victory if you want my affection.
If Scomo gets back in there’ll be much unhappiness throughout this sunburnt nation.
there would be at least 50% happiness.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
captain_spalding said:I know it’s early, but it don’t look good..
I don’t want to see that shit.
Early Labor victory if you want my affection.
If Scomo gets back in there’ll be much unhappiness throughout this sunburnt nation.
If scomo gets back in there’s obviously going to be a lot of happiness throughout this sunburnt nation.
Yeah somebody mentioned that.
But these early results are from the boondocks.
Once the metro results come in we’ll be smiling.
And Tony looks gone at this stage.
Lolz, Potato Head Dutton is losing so far.
Divine Angel said:
Lolz, Potato Head Dutton is losing so far.
What are you watching?
And polls close in WA
dv said:
And polls close in WA
still an hour to go isn’t it?
I thought it was 6pm. Just gorn 5.
dv said:
And polls close in WA
What?
sibeen said:
dv said:
And polls close in WA
What?
we close early and close often.
sibeen said:
Divine Angel said:
Lolz, Potato Head Dutton is losing so far.
What are you watching?
Alice Through the Looking Glass.
But reading this. Things seem to have switched since I last looked.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal/2019/results/list?filter=all&sort=az&state=qld
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
Divine Angel said:
Lolz, Potato Head Dutton is losing so far.
What are you watching?
Alice Through the Looking Glass.
But reading this. Things seem to have switched since I last looked.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal/2019/results/list?filter=all&sort=az&state=qld
Oh, clutches at chest for a second there I thought you may have been watching one of the commercial stations.
I have succumbed to boredom already…
Bubblecar said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
some good news, at least,
Genius move by Wong to murder Hawke and make it look like natural causes. It’s won them the election.
Twitches
Dropbear said:
Genius move by Wong to murder Hawke and make it look like natural causes. It’s won them the election.Twitches
Let’s hope so.
sibeen said:
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:What are you watching?
Alice Through the Looking Glass.
But reading this. Things seem to have switched since I last looked.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal/2019/results/list?filter=all&sort=az&state=qld
Oh, clutches at chest for a second there I thought you may have been watching one of the commercial stations.
Good lord! Do you think I’ve learned nothing from this forum?
Is this going to be another Don’s Party.
sibeen said:
…and a mass exodus to New Zealand.
Is this going to be another Don’s Party.
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
And polls close in WA
What?
we close early and close often.
AwesomeO said:
sibeen said:…and a mass exodus to New Zealand.
Is this going to be another Don’s Party.
One of my neighbours is a NZer and he was mentioning that today.
Ooh ABC has it 53 seats each right now.
Potato Head is going to retain his seat quite easily, apparently.
sibeen said:
Potato Head is going to retain his seat quite easily, apparently.
It’s just wrong she says stamping her foot.
sibeen said:
Potato Head is going to retain his seat quite easily, apparently.
…whilst Taus is going to explode.
With one vote counted it looks like a 100% swing to the challenger. Two votes counted now and the incumbent mounts a comback and has reached parity…
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:
Potato Head is going to retain his seat quite easily, apparently.
It’s just wrong she says stamping her foot.
Democracy…eh.
Abbott gone. Morrison cheers, albeit quietly.
sibeen said:
Abbott gone. Morrison cheers, albeit quietly.
Fucken smashed.
dv said:
sibeen said:
Abbott gone. Morrison cheers, albeit quietly.
Fucken smashed.
:)
sibeen said:
Abbott gone. Morrison cheers, albeit quietly.
Turnbull dances a jig, sings ‘oh happy day’.
Like an avo on toast…
Polls close in WA
party_pants said:
Polls close in WA
Polls in WA are closing every hour or so.
dv said:
sibeen said:
Abbott gone. Morrison cheers, albeit quietly.
Fucken smashed.
If Antony Green ever retires, DV will happily take his place.
How sad will I get?
What does Antony do between elections?
sarahs mum said:
How sad will I get?
I don’t know but I want a good result soon.
Tony’s gone but has this wretched government gone with him?
furious said:
- If Antony Green ever retires, DV will happily take his place.
What does Antony do between elections?
Hibernate
furious said:
- If Antony Green ever retires, DV will happily take his place.
What does Antony do between elections?
Cryogenic suspension.
Liberal Party
Scott Morrison (MP)
Vote:70.1%
sarahs mum said:
Liberal Party
Scott Morrison (MP) Vote:70.1%
Crazy fuckers.
Looks like the shits are back in.
What went wrong?
Jaysus, kii’s head is going to explode.
Bubblecar said:
Looks like the shits are back in.What went wrong?
Australians. By and large, they’re not very bright.
I may have mentioned something last week about echo chambers.
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
Looks like the shits are back in.What went wrong?
Australians. By and large, they’re not very bright.
Nation of ugly fucking retarded bullshit people.
I don’t think we’ll get a result tonight
sibeen said:
I may have mentioned something last week about echo chambers.
If you get all your news from the Guardian and Facebook you would be baffled.
Steady on, thats a bit harsh…
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
Looks like the shits are back in.What went wrong?
Australians. By and large, they’re not very bright.
Nation of ugly fucking retarded bullshit people.
ROFL. Democracy…eh.
He wouldn’t know, he doesnt vote…
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
Looks like the shits are back in.What went wrong?
Australians. By and large, they’re not very bright.
Nation of ugly fucking retarded bullshit people.
Well excuse me
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
Looks like the shits are back in.What went wrong?
Australians. By and large, they’re not very bright.
For some several years, the words were written on the wall of Harold Park Raceway:
‘Australian voters are a bunch of bloody-minded sheep’.
Oakeshott is starting to type up a speech.
dv said:
sibeen said:
Abbott gone. Morrison cheers, albeit quietly.
Fucken smashed.
I could die happy right now.
sibeen said:
Oakeshott is starting to type up a speech.
Belay that, he’s not going to get up.
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
Abbott gone. Morrison cheers, albeit quietly.
Fucken smashed.
I could die happy right now.
Yes, at least the biggest white ant in the hill seems to be gone.
I bet Albo has a nervous giggle happening.
AwesomeO said:
I bet Albo has a nervous giggle happening.
I was just thinking that.
Divine Angel said:
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:Australians. By and large, they’re not very bright.
Nation of ugly fucking retarded bullshit people.
Well excuse me
Obviously not including those who voted sensibly.
So far neither One Nation nor UAP have won any seats, so that’s good news.
Is it a problem with the polls again?
Divine Angel said:
So far neither One Nation nor UAP have won any seats, so that’s good news.
We might begin to hope that this is the end of them.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Is it a problem with the polls again?
No, the polls are fine.
The problem is with the election.
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
So far neither One Nation nor UAP have won any seats, so that’s good news.
We might begin to hope that this is the end of them.
UAP weren’t expecting to win any seats in the lower house, were they?
I want to see what’s happening in the senate.
Bubblecar said:
Divine Angel said:
Bubblecar said:Nation of ugly fucking retarded bullshit people.
Well excuse me
Obviously not including those who voted sensibly.
Flint Michigan voted for Obama and Trump so I guess being red necked dum as fuck deplorables is malleable.
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
So far neither One Nation nor UAP have won any seats, so that’s good news.
We might begin to hope that this is the end of them.
It’s probably too soon to hope.
sibeen said:
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
So far neither One Nation nor UAP have won any seats, so that’s good news.
We might begin to hope that this is the end of them.
UAP weren’t expecting to win any seats in the lower house, were they?
I want to see what’s happening in the senate.
Yeah, that’s their real aim. To be the holders of the balance, and dictate their terms for the passage of any legislation.
Big swing to the LNP in Queensland, quite a shock to be honest.
sibeen said:
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
So far neither One Nation nor UAP have won any seats, so that’s good news.
We might begin to hope that this is the end of them.
UAP weren’t expecting to win any seats in the lower house, were they?
I want to see what’s happening in the senate.
Senate votes take foreverrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Barnaby increased his vote.
sarahs mum said:
Barnaby increased his vote.
I was just reading that.
Wtf, Australia???
The question now is: if there’s no Abbott, who sees themselves as being ‘entitled’ to try to depose Morrison from the PM’s job?
Divine Angel said:
sarahs mum said:
Barnaby increased his vote.
I was just reading that.
Wtf, Australia???
This is what I mean. It’s not remotely endearing.
furious said:
- Senate votes take foreverrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Omg I’m sure the only reason I learned to count to 12 was because of Sesame Street.
captain_spalding said:
The question now is: if there’s no Abbott, who sees themselves as being ‘entitled’ to try to depose Morrison from the PM’s job?
Dutton.
sarahs mum said:
captain_spalding said:
The question now is: if there’s no Abbott, who sees themselves as being ‘entitled’ to try to depose Morrison from the PM’s job?
Dutton.
Yeah, he’s dumb enough to let himself once more be held up on a stick above the top of the trench.
Anyone else?
I’m going to start an emigration fund. Scotland or New Zealand.
Bubblecar said:
I’m going to start an emigration fund. Scotland or New Zealand.
New Zealand will be full.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m going to start an emigration fund. Scotland or New Zealand.
New Zealand will be full.
I’m half Kiwi, get behind me in the queue.
Scotland? Vote to stay with the mob who voted to leave? Go with NZ…
Spiny Norman said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m going to start an emigration fund. Scotland or New Zealand.
New Zealand will be full.
I’m half Kiwi, get behind me in the queue.
I don’t think they’ll let you sneak someone in with the old “he’s with me”.
The other thing for which we should be thankful is that it seems that Abbott won’t be able to re-install Peta Credlin in Canberra for her to wreak her own personal style of savage blood-feud tyranny around the Liberal Party and Parliament House.
Spiny Norman said:
I’m half Kiwi, get behind me in the queue.
Which half?
furious said:
- I’m going to start an emigration fund. Scotland or New Zealand.
Scotland? Vote to stay with the mob who voted to leave? Go with NZ…
I saw a picture of some Scots waving flags, pretty sure that means it is full of right wing nazis.
AwesomeO said:
I saw a picture of some Scots waving flags, pretty sure that means it is full of right wing nazis.
They were sending semaphore: ‘send more drink, beginning to sober up’.
That was actually a very good speech by Tony.
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:I’m half Kiwi, get behind me in the queue.
Which half?
The sheepish half, why do you ask?
sibeen said:
That was actually a very good speech by Tony.
He’s quite articulate, really, when he’s allowed to be. Had a first-class brain, Rhodes scholar and all.
We might wonder what happened to him somewhere along the line.
AwesomeO said:
furious said:
- I’m going to start an emigration fund. Scotland or New Zealand.
Scotland? Vote to stay with the mob who voted to leave? Go with NZ…
I saw a picture of some Scots waving flags, pretty sure that means it is full of right wing nazis.
I met the mayor Haddington in 2014. He informed me that I would see the saltire everywhere and sometimes it represented Scotland the country and sometimes it represented Independence. We weren’t supposed to jump to conclusions.
Spiny Norman said:
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:I’m half Kiwi, get behind me in the queue.
Which half?
The sheepish half, why do you ask?
Thought it might be top/bottom, left/right…
sarahs mum said:
AwesomeO said:
furious said:
- I’m going to start an emigration fund. Scotland or New Zealand.
Scotland? Vote to stay with the mob who voted to leave? Go with NZ…
I saw a picture of some Scots waving flags, pretty sure that means it is full of right wing nazis.
I met the mayor Haddington in 2014. He informed me that I would see the saltire everywhere and sometimes it represented Scotland the country and sometimes it represented Independence. We weren’t supposed to jump to conclusions.
I think I’ll jump to a conclusion, makes outrage so much easier.
Labor to win has blown out to $4+ with the bookies.
sibeen said:
Labor to win has blown out to $4+ with the bookies.
They’re still taking bets?
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
Labor to win has blown out to $4+ with the bookies.
They’re still taking bets?
Yeah, why not.
So who is replacing Bill?
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
Labor to win has blown out to $4+ with the bookies.
They’re still taking bets?
If you’re silly enough to offer them money against the odds, they’re silly enough to take it from you.
sarahs mum said:
So who is replacing Bill?
Anthony Albanese.
Maybe Palmer feeding preferences to the Libs might have mattered after all.
sarahs mum said:
So who is replacing Bill?
Good question.
I was just thinking that that nasty toad Frydenberg will probably have a go at wresting the PM position from Morrison. Might depend on whether the Libs will tolerate a Jewish leader/PM.
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
So who is replacing Bill?Anthony Albanese.
Yeah, you’re right, short odds there.
dv said:
Big swing to the LNP in Queensland, quite a shock to be honest.
Abolish the states and govern it all from Melbourne.
It’s not good is it?
dv said:
Maybe Palmer feeding preferences to the Libs might have mattered after all.
He’ll make sure they’re aware of any debt to him.
dv said:
Maybe Palmer feeding preferences to the Libs might have mattered after all.
That was my fear all along. $150 a week extra for pensioners is a big promise.
kii said:
It’s not good is it?
Afraid not.
kii said:
It’s not good is it?
It’s f*cked.
kii said:
It’s not good is it?
Well, it looks like Tony Abbott is toast. That’s a plus.
In all fairness, Green has not called the election yet, and when it’s really over he’s usually not shy.
kii said:
It’s not good is it?
You’re lucky, kii, you don’t have to move.
sarahs mum said:
captain_spalding said:
The question now is: if there’s no Abbott, who sees themselves as being ‘entitled’ to try to depose Morrison from the PM’s job?
Dutton.
If Scomo Inc wins this it will go down as a Coalition ‘sweetest victory of all’… He’ll be a hero and can retire at his leisure.
sibeen said:
kii said:
It’s not good is it?
You’re lucky, kii, you don’t have to move.
Well, I’m sort of stuck. The new kitchen window has a spell on me.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Maybe Palmer feeding preferences to the Libs might have mattered after all.
That was my fear all along. $150 a week extra for pensioners is a big promise.
I hope the pensioners rise up en masse when they realise they are not getting that $150 and have Clive’s guts for garters..
dv said:
In all fairness, Green has not called the election yet, and when it’s really over he’s usually not shy.
With only 17 seats in doubt I don’t think his call will be that far off.
Dutton has won Dickson
sibeen said:
dv said:
In all fairness, Green has not called the election yet, and when it’s really over he’s usually not shy.
With only 17 seats in doubt I don’t think his call will be that far off.
How’s WA looking?
And will pre-poll voting have much of an influence? “Record numbers” of people pre-voted.
dv said:
Dutton has won Dickson
:(
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:
captain_spalding said:
The question now is: if there’s no Abbott, who sees themselves as being ‘entitled’ to try to depose Morrison from the PM’s job?
Dutton.
If Scomo Inc wins this it will go down as a Coalition ‘sweetest victory of all’… He’ll be a hero and can retire at his leisure.
Don’t think so. Morrison was only ever a place-holder. He was supposed to keep the chair warm for Abbott, who didn’t want to take over when Turnbull was deposed because it would have been a very bad look for him and the Liberal Party at the time.
The unexpected has happened, and Tony probably won’t be around to take over from Morrison after all. That doesn’t mean that the Libs want Morrison to stay there, or that there aren’t Liberals who have been looking at the field marshal’s baton in their knapsack.
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
In all fairness, Green has not called the election yet, and when it’s really over he’s usually not shy.
With only 17 seats in doubt I don’t think his call will be that far off.
How’s WA looking?
And will pre-poll voting have much of an influence? “Record numbers” of people pre-voted.
Does anyone really think that the pre-poll voters will be any different than people who voted today?
sibeen said:
dv said:
In all fairness, Green has not called the election yet, and when it’s really over he’s usually not shy.
With only 17 seats in doubt I don’t think his call will be that far off.
He didn’t call it just then, but he got awfully bloody close.
sibeen said:
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:With only 17 seats in doubt I don’t think his call will be that far off.
How’s WA looking?
And will pre-poll voting have much of an influence? “Record numbers” of people pre-voted.
Does anyone really think that the pre-poll voters will be any different than people who voted today?
Guess it turns out that reports of sentimental votes for Labor after Hawke’s death were exaggerated.
sibeen said:
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:With only 17 seats in doubt I don’t think his call will be that far off.
How’s WA looking?
And will pre-poll voting have much of an influence? “Record numbers” of people pre-voted.
Does anyone really think that the pre-poll voters will be any different than people who voted today?
It’s possible.
ruby said:
I hope the pensioners rise up en masse when they realise they are not getting that $150 and have Clive’s guts for garters..
Clive has the ideal excuse:
“I made the promise, but they failed to keep it.”
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
Divine Angel said:How’s WA looking?
And will pre-poll voting have much of an influence? “Record numbers” of people pre-voted.
Does anyone really think that the pre-poll voters will be any different than people who voted today?
Guess it turns out that reports of sentimental votes for Labor after Hawke’s death were exaggerated.
That was just Dropbear being silly.
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
In all fairness, Green has not called the election yet, and when it’s really over he’s usually not shy.
With only 17 seats in doubt I don’t think his call will be that far off.
How’s WA looking?
And will pre-poll voting have much of an influence? “Record numbers” of people pre-voted.
In the recent Vic state election they counted prepoll seperately on the night. Dunno about tonight.
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:Dutton.
If Scomo Inc wins this it will go down as a Coalition ‘sweetest victory of all’… He’ll be a hero and can retire at his leisure.
Don’t think so. Morrison was only ever a place-holder. He was supposed to keep the chair warm for Abbott, who didn’t want to take over when Turnbull was deposed because it would have been a very bad look for him and the Liberal Party at the time.
The unexpected has happened, and Tony probably won’t be around to take over from Morrison after all. That doesn’t mean that the Libs want Morrison to stay there, or that there aren’t Liberals who have been looking at the field marshal’s baton in their knapsack.
You’re not far off being a complete nutter…
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:If Scomo Inc wins this it will go down as a Coalition ‘sweetest victory of all’… He’ll be a hero and can retire at his leisure.
Don’t think so. Morrison was only ever a place-holder. He was supposed to keep the chair warm for Abbott, who didn’t want to take over when Turnbull was deposed because it would have been a very bad look for him and the Liberal Party at the time.
The unexpected has happened, and Tony probably won’t be around to take over from Morrison after all. That doesn’t mean that the Libs want Morrison to stay there, or that there aren’t Liberals who have been looking at the field marshal’s baton in their knapsack.
You’re not far off being a complete nutter…
I know. Two more stamps in my book, and i get the badge.
Yep, Don’s Party.
I hate to think what the senate will look like.
The ABC computer now has the Coalition on 72. With Steggals, Phelps, McGowan and Katter, that’s enough.
But Green is keeping his powder dry…
Run down the curtain, Fred, show’s over.

ruby said:
I hate to think what the senate will look like.
Malcolm Roberts looks like he has got a full quota and will be returning to the Senate.
Bill must be feeling like Hilary did, gobsmacked after expecting to walk it in.
sibeen said:
ruby said:
I hate to think what the senate will look like.
Malcolm Roberts looks like he has got a full quota and will be returning to the Senate.
ffs.
Talking heads have some answering to do as well if they want to continue calling themselves pundits and analysts.
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:
ruby said:
I hate to think what the senate will look like.
Malcolm Roberts looks like he has got a full quota and will be returning to the Senate.
ffs.
Any word on Anning in QLD?
AwesomeO said:
Talking heads have some answering to do as well if they want to continue calling themselves pundits and analysts.
Andrew Bolt probably looks golden.
AwesomeO said:
Talking heads have some answering to do as well if they want to continue calling themselves pundits and analysts.
Be fair.
dv has been saying it will be close for ages.
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:
Talking heads have some answering to do as well if they want to continue calling themselves pundits and analysts.
Andrew Bolt probably looks golden.
He’ll need therapy about Abbott.
Lee Sales just brought out the shotgun :)
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:
Talking heads have some answering to do as well if they want to continue calling themselves pundits and analysts.
Andrew Bolt probably looks golden.
Not read him since he went behind a firewall, he might have predicted LNP he wouldn’t have predicted Abbott.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
Talking heads have some answering to do as well if they want to continue calling themselves pundits and analysts.
Be fair.
dv has been saying it will be close for ages.
Doesn’t seem close from here, looks done and almost dusted and it’s just gone 9. I am sure that was the general feel from the pundits but not in this direction.
I think Hawkie knew something and didn’t want to see it.
‘…Penny Wong acknowledges that Queensland is a problem for the ALP’. – ABC News
Penny, Queensland is a problem for Queensland, let alone the ALP.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
Talking heads have some answering to do as well if they want to continue calling themselves pundits and analysts.
Be fair.
dv has been saying it will be close for ages.
There’s no doubt the result in Qld represents maybe the biggest state polling failure of the last 30 years in Australia. Respondents were indicatng a 3% swing to the ALP: present results suggest a 4% swing to the Coalition. It’s unprecedented in the era of scientific polling in Australia and I’ll be interested to see how the industry responds, or how psephologists explain it. Certainly, I’ve no idea.
I heard the Tony Abbott news on the radio coming home. Any news on Dutton yet?
buffy said:
Any news on Dutton yet?
Still in Parliament.
Still a vegetable with limbs.
So, no change.
buffy said:
I heard the Tony Abbott news on the radio coming home. Any news on Dutton yet?
The stake through the cold dark heart did not work.
buffy said:
I heard the Tony Abbott news on the radio coming home. Any news on Dutton yet?
he lives.
ruby said:
buffy said:I heard the Tony Abbott news on the radio coming home. Any news on Dutton yet?
The stake through the cold dark heart did not work.
Dutton won
HE’S CALLED IT.
sibeen said:
HE’S CALLED IT.
who?
buffy said:
Any news on Dutton yet?
There were reports that he’s grown a mo and taken too smoking a pipe.

captain_spalding said:
buffy said:Any news on Dutton yet?Still in Parliament.
Still a vegetable with limbs.
So, no change.
but he has eyes everywhere.
ChrispenEvan said:
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:Any news on Dutton yet?Still in Parliament.
Still a vegetable with limbs.
So, no change.
but he has eyes everywhere.
Although most of them are in boxes in hall cupboards.
mollwollfumble said:
sibeen said:
HE’S CALLED IT.
who?
If you don’t know the answer to that you probably shouldn’t be in this thread.
Spud having a go at the mike right now.
If I go to bed now, will someone please post an election summary before I wake up around 1 am?
eg. Did Abbott get bowled out. I’m rather hoping he did.
There’s a chance I may be voting again soon.
mollwollfumble said:
If I go to bed now, will someone please post an election summary before I wake up around 1 am?eg. Did Abbott get bowled out. I’m rather hoping he did.
Yes, Abbott is out.
Shorten?
furious said:
- There’s a chance I may be voting again soon.
Shorten?
Yep. Fair chance he’ll fall on his sword, unless he really needs the job.
mollwollfumble said:
If I go to bed now, will someone please post an election summary before I wake up around 1 am?eg. Did Abbott get bowled out. I’m rather hoping he did.
Abbott our, Dutton in, LNP looks re-elected although at the moment we don’t know majority or not.
I’m gonna blame the full moon for this result.
It’s sort of interesting that if it had gone the way the pollsters said, that would have been a huge swing against the Libs.
The way it looks it has gone is apparently an overwhelming move of the masses against the Labs.
But we are talking a change of about 2%.
Shorten’s utter lack of charisma…
Shorten’s utter lack of charisma…
I feel like I did when Howard got in a third term.
sarahs mum said:
I feel like I did when Howard got in a third term.
still one has to take hope that all the money the LNP has doled out and the promises of surpluses etc will come back to bite them.
sarahs mum said:
I feel like I did when Howard got in a third term.
At least the Libs will now have to live with not achieving the budget surplus, rather than having it as something they can blame on the Labs.
ChrispenEvan said:
sarahs mum said:
I feel like I did when Howard got in a third term.
still one has to take hope that all the money the LNP has doled out and the promises of surpluses etc will come back to bite them.
It doesn’t console me.
sarahs mum said:
I feel like I did when Howard got in a third term.
We’ve got that disgusting fake “blokey” Christian dick lording it over us on behalf of his billionaire cartels for years to come.
This piece of shit must be cackling indeed:

https://tallyroom.aec.gov.au/HouseDefault-24310.htm
Still awaiting Shorten’s walk-of-shame…
Plibersek being stupid.
What this means is that the federal crime and corruption commission won’t happen: there won’t be any investigations of the 9 digit sums handed by the Coalition to industry bodies without a tender process or defensible rationale. They got away with it.
dv said:
What this means is that the federal crime and corruption commission won’t happen: there won’t be any investigations of the 9 digit sums handed by the Coalition to industry bodies without a tender process or defensible rationale. They got away with it.
And more.
They have a mandate.
Jacqui Lambie has got a good chance of getting up.
dv said:
What this means is that the federal crime and corruption commission won’t happen: there won’t be any investigations of the 9 digit sums handed by the Coalition to industry bodies without a tender process or defensible rationale. They got away with it.
Depressing.
Whoever bank rolled Clive will be very happy with their investment.
Albo up now, time for a leadership pitch.
ruby said:
dv said:
What this means is that the federal crime and corruption commission won’t happen: there won’t be any investigations of the 9 digit sums handed by the Coalition to industry bodies without a tender process or defensible rationale. They got away with it.
Depressing.
Whoever bank rolled Clive will be very happy with their investment.
Doesn’t look like they’ve picked up anything. No senate seats.
Wont somebody think about the poor LNP members who jumped ship, only to see it steam away without them.
sibeen said:
ruby said:
dv said:
What this means is that the federal crime and corruption commission won’t happen: there won’t be any investigations of the 9 digit sums handed by the Coalition to industry bodies without a tender process or defensible rationale. They got away with it.
Depressing.
Whoever bank rolled Clive will be very happy with their investment.
Doesn’t look like they’ve picked up anything. No senate seats.
They got their preferred horse over the line though…
sibeen said:
Doesn’t look like they’ve picked up anything. No senate seats.
I picked up 6 outa 6 on me footy tips, Beeny Boy.
PermeateFree said:
Wont somebody think about the poor LNP members who jumped ship, only to see it steam away without them.
:)
Woodie said:
sibeen said:Doesn’t look like they’ve picked up anything. No senate seats.
I picked up 6 outa 6 on me footy tips, Beeny Boy.
4 outa here.
Fraser Anning is on about 1.4% in the Senate in Qld, which will not be enough.
So that’s something.
dv said:
Fraser Anning is on about 1.4% in the Senate in Qld, which will not be enough.So that’s something.
Thank you for that something.
Looks like a 3 LNP, 2 ALP, 1 Green split in NSW, Victoria, SA and WA. In Qld One Nation will take the third conservative slot (Malcolm Roberts lol), and maybe Jacqui Lambie will take the third conservative slot in Tasmania. The territories will be evenly split.
https://www.perthnow.com.au/politics/federal-election-2019/federal-election-2019-exit-polls-point-to-a-labor-victory-over-the-coalition-ng-b881203698z
Even the exit polls were showing 52-48 to ALP. What a weird day.
Another morsel of good news is that Phelps will hold Wentworth
I was hoping that the COALition would be turfed.
Nappies and Governments need to be changed regularly, for the same reason.
As a bloke from the bush, I understand why all those around here vote for anyone other than Labor.
Every time they get into power, they cripple the people that produce wealth.
So to wrap up:
The LNP have picked up Bass and Braddon in Tasmania.
In Qld, they’ve gained Herbert and Longman. In NSW th ey won Lindsay.
The LNP lost Warringah, Wentworth and Gilmore in NSW.
They might yet lose Boothby in SA and Chisholm in Victoria. They could pick up Macquarie in NSW.
dv said:
Looks like a 3 LNP, 2 ALP, 1 Green split in NSW, Victoria, SA and WA. In Qld One Nation will take the third conservative slot (Malcolm Roberts lol), and maybe Jacqui Lambie will take the third conservative slot in Tasmania. The territories will be evenly split.
Lost Lisa Singh.
Kingy said:
I was hoping that the COALition would be turfed.Nappies and Governments need to be changed regularly, for the same reason.
As a bloke from the bush, I understand why all those around here vote for anyone other than Labor.
Every time they get into power, they cripple the people that produce wealth.
leans a lot on cripple, that.
Looks like I won’t be voting again soon.
dv said:
Looks like a 3 LNP, 2 ALP, 1 Green split in NSW, Victoria, SA and WA. In Qld One Nation will take the third conservative slot (Malcolm Roberts lol), and maybe Jacqui Lambie will take the third conservative slot in Tasmania. The territories will be evenly split.
Is that officially from the AEC website? I thought they didn’t really count the senate more than the first preference without any flows.
sibeen said:
Looks like I won’t be voting again soon.
He may stick around on the backbench.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:
Looks like I won’t be voting again soon.
He may stick around on the backbench.
He just stated he is going to, but he won’t contest the leadership.
So Albo or Tanya, with Albo probably favourite.
When he speaks off the cuff BS is actually quite good as I’ve lamented before.
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Looks like a 3 LNP, 2 ALP, 1 Green split in NSW, Victoria, SA and WA. In Qld One Nation will take the third conservative slot (Malcolm Roberts lol), and maybe Jacqui Lambie will take the third conservative slot in Tasmania. The territories will be evenly split.Is that officially from the AEC website? I thought they didn’t really count the senate more than the first preference without any flows.
No, it is a projection
Oh well. We can be thankful for our free democratic electoral processes and the lovely country we live in because of it.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Oh well. We can be thankful for our free democratic electoral processes and the lovely country we live in because of it.
Oh and that Abbott the fucktard is gone.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Oh well. We can be thankful for our free democratic electoral processes and the lovely country we live in because of it.
We certainly can.
And the final result appears to be a reasonable reflection of the people’s will.
The Coalition easily won the popular vote too. 50.73 to 49.27 and had a 1.21% swing to them.
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Coalition easily won the popular vote too. 50.73 to 49.27 and had a 1.21% swing to them.
Damn, I was hoping they lost that so the whinging could have been increased by an order of magnitude.
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Coalition easily won the popular vote too. 50.73 to 49.27 and had a 1.21% swing to them.
Damn, I was hoping they lost that so the whinging could have been increased by an order of magnitude.
The Labor faithful don’t need a reason to whinge thank you very much.
Anthony Albanese has confirmed he will nominate for the Labor leadership.
That didn’t take long :)
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Oh well. We can be thankful for our free democratic electoral processes and the lovely country we live in because of it.
We certainly can.
And the final result appears to be a reasonable reflection of the people’s will.
Yes, and as unfortunate as it is, this is how a democracy works.
It appears that almost half of the voters just vote against the other party to try to stop them from being in power.
It is a terrible way to choose a government, but apparently the best one we have found so far.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Oh well. We can be thankful for our free democratic electoral processes and the lovely country we live in because of it.
Meh.
Oh well, SWMBO is very happy. She hates Shorten. Has had a few run ins with him over the last ten years or so. Reckons he’s an arsehole.
sibeen said:
Oh well, SWMBO is very happy. She hates Shorten. Has had a few run ins with him over the last ten years or so. Reckons he’s an arsehole.
She’s a dick.
Rupert once again gets what he wants, he deposed our leader and put in his man.
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Oh well, SWMBO is very happy. She hates Shorten. Has had a few run ins with him over the last ten years or so. Reckons he’s an arsehole.
She’s a dick.
No, really, she’s not. We happen to disagree on many political positions. She also believes in god, I don’t; and yet I find I can find her tolerable enough to live with.
tauto said:
Rupert once again gets what he wants, he deposed our leader and put in his man.
Don’t say a word against Rupert, Aussies love him. They still queue up to buy his shitty rags.
tauto said:
Rupert once again gets what he wants, he deposed our leader and put in his man.
ROFL.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Oh well, SWMBO is very happy. She hates Shorten. Has had a few run ins with him over the last ten years or so. Reckons he’s an arsehole.
She’s a dick.
No, really, she’s not. We happen to disagree on many political positions. She also believes in god, I don’t; and yet I find I can find her tolerable enough to live with.
She’s a dick.
Scomo makes a good speech.
As far as I’m concerned, Australia is a dying dump and I want out.
There are far nicer countries that also have free democratic systems. Such as Scotland and New Zealand :)
Witty Rejoinder said:
Scomo makes a good speech.
He’s a dick.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Oh well, SWMBO is very happy. She hates Shorten. Has had a few run ins with him over the last ten years or so. Reckons he’s an arsehole.
She’s a dick.
No, really, she’s not. We happen to disagree on many political positions. She also believes in god, I don’t; and yet I find I can find her tolerable enough to live with.
She must be bloody tolerant having to live with you.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:She’s a dick.
No, really, she’s not. We happen to disagree on many political positions. She also believes in god, I don’t; and yet I find I can find her tolerable enough to live with.
She must be bloody tolerant having to live with you.
She’s a saint :)
Bubblecar said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Scomo makes a good speech.
He’s a dick.
It’s all dicks with you homosexuals…
Err, he fucked it with the ‘god blees Australia’.
Never mind, just think all those people who voted for the LNP will be going to hell with the rest of us.
Not the time to annoy a Labor Party member.
https://i.imgur.com/Hnr3PCx.mp4
Will it all be worth it if we we win Eurovision?
Witty Rejoinder said:
Will it all be worth it if we we win Eurovision?
Probably not.
sibeen said:
tauto said:
Rupert once again gets what he wants, he deposed our leader and put in his man.
ROFL.
Rofl all you like, but it is true, rupert is trying to get jerry interested into just what he did to australia
tauto said:
sibeen said:
tauto said:
Rupert once again gets what he wants, he deposed our leader and put in his man.
ROFL.
Rofl all you like, but it is true, rupert is trying to get jerry interested into just what he did to australia
die another day
SCIENCE said:
tauto said:
sibeen said:ROFL.
Rofl all you like, but it is true, rupert is trying to get jerry interested into just what he did to australia
die another day
Good film. That Pierce Brosnan is to die for. Another day so to speak.
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
tauto said:Rofl all you like, but it is true, rupert is trying to get jerry interested into just what he did to australia
die another day
Good film. That Pierce Brosnan is to die for. Another day so to speak.
Can someone explain what tauto is on about?
Oh well. The last of the red wine is almost done and tomorrow will be another day.
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:die another day
Good film. That Pierce Brosnan is to die for. Another day so to speak.
Can someone explain what tauto is on about?
If i were employed as his spokesman I would suggest that it is complex.
When does the good God-fearing older sprog get to vote Sibeen?
Witty Rejoinder said:
When does the good God-fearing older sprog get to vote Sibeen?
She’ll be 18 in December. Green, Green and Green, that’s her current political position.
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
When does the good God-fearing older sprog get to vote Sibeen?
She’ll be 18 in December. Green, Green and Green, that’s her current political position.
Kids today… Gotta love ‘em. Can’t kill ‘em.
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:die another day
Good film. That Pierce Brosnan is to die for. Another day so to speak.
Can someone explain what tauto is on about?
Election results, media bias,
australia’s been in recession for a while, following a global slow down, + geopolitical stuff happening between big players, trade war for example, these have influenced domestic political sentiments. Certainly no overwhelming enthusiasm for change that would hit the personal purse.
the election coincided with a serious decline in property values, or depressed market probably better said.
I think a lot of people are sitting on their hands, tightening their belts. The unexpected (for some) election result was just that, more of that restraint, an expression of.
at least some of the global uncertainty is being manufactured.
Fuck
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
tauto said:Rofl all you like, but it is true, rupert is trying to get jerry interested into just what he did to australia
die another day
Good film. That Pierce Brosnan is to die for. Another day so to speak.
fair point, i think i got the wrong Alan Bond mixed up
might have meant tomorrow never dies
i think i can find you all something positive tomorrow
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:die another day
Good film. That Pierce Brosnan is to die for. Another day so to speak.
fair point, i think i got the wrong Alan Bond mixed up
might have meant tomorrow never dies
i think i can find you all something positive tomorrow
Morning all.
Shorten is reported to have conceded victory to Morrison & has stood down as ALP leader.
IMO if he had stood down before the election there would have been a greater chance of an ALP victory.
Turns out the asparagus was right 😕
From my Facepalm feed.
As I’ve been saying for many years, the ALP are the amateur vandals, the LNP are the professional vandals. I hope we’re not too much worse off three years from now. :(
Spiny Norman said:
From my Facepalm feed.
As I’ve been saying for many years, the ALP are the amateur vandals, the LNP are the professional vandals. I hope we’re not too much worse off three years from now. :(
Years ago I votes LNP because at the time ALP was giving the country away for free & LNP were selling it.
Looks like Shorty should have come straight with Qld and say hell yeah, Adani can stay. The double talk about sovereign risk just interjected doubt.
sarahs mum said:
I feel like I did when Howard got in a third term.
My mother decided that dying was better than having to go through that again.
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:
I feel like I did when Howard got in a third term.
My mother decided that dying was better than having to go through that again.
‘United States diplomats have warned commercial airliners flying over the Persian Gulf risk being targeted by “miscalculation or misidentification” from the Iranian military amid heightened tensions between the Islamic Republic and the US, even as both Washington and Tehran say they do not seek war.’ – ABC News
And the Americans should know.
‘The USS Vincennes shot down Iran Air flight 655, killing all 290 civilians aboard in one of the worst naval accidents in U.S. history.
Alex Kasprak
In 1988, the U.S. Navy shot down an Iranian passenger jet, killing 290 civilians; Some members of the crew that shot the plane down were later awarded medals, and the United States has not formally apologized for the event.’ – snopes.com
Tamb said:
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:
I feel like I did when Howard got in a third term.
My mother decided that dying was better than having to go through that again.
Dementia can sometimes have an upside. We had to take my Mum off the electoral roll because she kept trying to vote for “That nice Mr Menzies”.
When I was in queue to have my name ticked off the roll, the lady in front of me has dementia. The electoral guy explained the procedure half a dozen times. She kept saying she didn’t understand. The lady’s adult daughter was saying, “don’t worry mum, i’ll help you”.
So, what’s the full time score?
Seems there was a 3.2% polling miss in the national 2pp. Utterly unprecedented. To put it into context, normally a 1% miss would be considered very bad.
mollwollfumble said:
So, what’s the full time score?
Adani – 1
Australia – 0
A 90 minute insiders today.
Divine Angel said:
Tamb said:
roughbarked said:My mother decided that dying was better than having to go through that again.
Dementia can sometimes have an upside. We had to take my Mum off the electoral roll because she kept trying to vote for “That nice Mr Menzies”.When I was in queue to have my name ticked off the roll, the lady in front of me has dementia. The electoral guy explained the procedure half a dozen times. She kept saying she didn’t understand. The lady’s adult daughter was saying, “don’t worry mum, i’ll help you”.
Um…IIRC the polling booth people are supposed to um…..not let that happen? I don’t know anything anymore…last polling booth I worked on was for my Nana in Bondi for Neville Wran. She loved him, and apparently he was very fond of my grandparents (according to them).
captain_spalding said:
mollwollfumble said:
So, what’s the full time score?
Adani – 1
Australia – 0
Yep. Let’s just fuck the country over completely, and be more greedy and divisive.
Divine Angel said:
Tamb said:
roughbarked said:My mother decided that dying was better than having to go through that again.
Dementia can sometimes have an upside. We had to take my Mum off the electoral roll because she kept trying to vote for “That nice Mr Menzies”.When I was in queue to have my name ticked off the roll, the lady in front of me has dementia. The electoral guy explained the procedure half a dozen times. She kept saying she didn’t understand. The lady’s adult daughter was saying, “don’t worry mum, i’ll help you”.
As I mentioned yesterday, I’ll bet my father filled in my mother’s ballots. And not the way she would have done it…
captain_spalding said:
mollwollfumble said:
So, what’s the full time score?
Adani – 1
Australia – 0
Yep. In a nutshell.
dv said:
Seems there was a 3.2% polling miss in the national 2pp. Utterly unprecedented. To put it into context, normally a 1% miss would be considered very bad.
Given that there were a high proportion of “undecided”, I wonder how much of that swing can be attributed to the lying 2 page spreads from Palmer in the national press every day over the last week, which had the sole message “Shorten is an untrustworthy piece of shit”.
I mean if I’d been undecided I can see that sort of thing might have a subconscious effect, even if I didn’t want to admit it.
BTW, on top of everything else, Dutton is an extreme hypocrite.
dv said:
Seems there was a 3.2% polling miss in the national 2pp. Utterly unprecedented. To put it into context, normally a 1% miss would be considered very bad.
So that link I posted the other day was right about the polls being improbable?
poikilotherm said:
dv said:
Seems there was a 3.2% polling miss in the national 2pp. Utterly unprecedented. To put it into context, normally a 1% miss would be considered very bad.
So that link I posted the other day was right about the polls being improbable?
Tamb said:
poikilotherm said:
dv said:
Seems there was a 3.2% polling miss in the national 2pp. Utterly unprecedented. To put it into context, normally a 1% miss would be considered very bad.
So that link I posted the other day was right about the polls being improbable?
Polls are still landline based. Generally only old people use landlines thus the sample is skewed.
Unlikely but possible, they ask for age before continuing with the poll, our land line gets frequent calls from ReachTel et al, if they don’t need you, the robot hangs up.
A mayte and I were talking and we agreed that one out of three was at least no worse than a poke in the eye with a blunt stick. ie: we still have Dutton and that joke Joyce, yet we lose the rabbit.
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:
poikilotherm said:So that link I posted the other day was right about the polls being improbable?
Polls are still landline based. Generally only old people use landlines thus the sample is skewed.Unlikely but possible, they ask for age before continuing with the poll, our land line gets frequent calls from ReachTel et al, if they don’t need you, the robot hangs up.
Many younger people don’t have a landline so they cannot be polled.
Not a lot of sympathy for Anning in the comments on his FB page.
😊
Tamb said:
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:Polls are still landline based. Generally only old people use landlines thus the sample is skewed.
Unlikely but possible, they ask for age before continuing with the poll, our land line gets frequent calls from ReachTel et al, if they don’t need you, the robot hangs up.
Many younger people don’t have a landline so they cannot be polled.
No shit.
“The results have been weighted by gender and age to reflect the population according to ABS figures. “
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:
poikilotherm said:Unlikely but possible, they ask for age before continuing with the poll, our land line gets frequent calls from ReachTel et al, if they don’t need you, the robot hangs up.
Many younger people don’t have a landline so they cannot be polled.
No shit.
“The results have been weighted by gender and age to reflect the population according to ABS figures. “
antony green commented on the polling last night. something about not knowing the area of the person being called because it was a mobile phone. iirc.
One of the dumbest pieces of analysis comes from the Guardian.
“Conventional wisdom going into the election was that Labor would win, so Saturday’s result had people scratching their heads about the opinion polls.
But the actual election result was 50.7-49.3, which is within the 3% margin of error for polls that had been calling it for Labor. Only Queensland swung further than the margin of error.”
dv said:
One of the dumbest pieces of analysis comes from the Guardian.“Conventional wisdom going into the election was that Labor would win, so Saturday’s result had people scratching their heads about the opinion polls.
But the actual election result was 50.7-49.3, which is within the 3% margin of error for polls that had been calling it for Labor. Only Queensland swung further than the margin of error.”
This. It’s not a big swing. And as for the Senate, we won’t know about that for weeks.

dv said:
Only Queensland swung further than the margin of error.”
We need stronger borders. Especially the NSW Qld one and the NT QLD one.
ChrispenEvan said:
the plug has been pulled.
ChrispenEvan said:
dv said:
Only Queensland swung further than the margin of error.”We need stronger borders. Especially the NSW Qld one and the NT QLD one.
Cut them adrift, I say.
ChrispenEvan said:
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:Many younger people don’t have a landline so they cannot be polled.
No shit.
“The results have been weighted by gender and age to reflect the population according to ABS figures. “
antony green commented on the polling last night. something about not knowing the area of the person being called because it was a mobile phone. iirc.
I guess that’s a plus, we’re not like the USA where location data is shared by the telco to whoever wants to pay for it.
dv said:
One of the dumbest pieces of analysis comes from the Guardian.“Conventional wisdom going into the election was that Labor would win, so Saturday’s result had people scratching their heads about the opinion polls.
But the actual election result was 50.7-49.3, which is within the 3% margin of error for polls that had been calling it for Labor. Only Queensland swung further than the margin of error.”
Is that dumb?
Anyway, surely high undecided * high minor party vote = greater variation in final outcome.
Morning tea. Does anyone here need a happy face put on that plate?
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
One of the dumbest pieces of analysis comes from the Guardian.“Conventional wisdom going into the election was that Labor would win, so Saturday’s result had people scratching their heads about the opinion polls.
But the actual election result was 50.7-49.3, which is within the 3% margin of error for polls that had been calling it for Labor. Only Queensland swung further than the margin of error.”
Is that dumb?
Yes.
An individual poll has an uncertainty of 3%. A poll aggregate of 10 recent polls has an uncertainty of less than 1%.
buffy said:
dv said:
One of the dumbest pieces of analysis comes from the Guardian.“Conventional wisdom going into the election was that Labor would win, so Saturday’s result had people scratching their heads about the opinion polls.
But the actual election result was 50.7-49.3, which is within the 3% margin of error for polls that had been calling it for Labor. Only Queensland swung further than the margin of error.”
This. It’s not a big swing.
It’s a massive swing. The polling indicated a 3% swing to the ALP (which would have been a very big swing) and the result was a 4% swing away from the ALP. A 7% miss, when the aggregated polling uncertainty was 1%. This makes it a systematic error across all the major pollsters.
dv said:
buffy said:
dv said:
One of the dumbest pieces of analysis comes from the Guardian.“Conventional wisdom going into the election was that Labor would win, so Saturday’s result had people scratching their heads about the opinion polls.
But the actual election result was 50.7-49.3, which is within the 3% margin of error for polls that had been calling it for Labor. Only Queensland swung further than the margin of error.”
This. It’s not a big swing.
It’s a massive swing. The polling indicated a 3% swing to the ALP (which would have been a very big swing) and the result was a 4% swing away from the ALP. A 7% miss, when the aggregated polling uncertainty was 1%. This makes it a systematic error across all the major pollsters.
Please show working.
The last results I looked at (this morning) showed 50.7 Lib 49.3 Lab, as quoted by Guardian.
How is that a 4% swing away?
dv said:
buffy said:
dv said:
One of the dumbest pieces of analysis comes from the Guardian.“Conventional wisdom going into the election was that Labor would win, so Saturday’s result had people scratching their heads about the opinion polls.
But the actual election result was 50.7-49.3, which is within the 3% margin of error for polls that had been calling it for Labor. Only Queensland swung further than the margin of error.”
This. It’s not a big swing.
It’s a massive swing. The polling indicated a 3% swing to the ALP (which would have been a very big swing) and the result was a 4% swing away from the ALP. A 7% miss, when the aggregated polling uncertainty was 1%. This makes it a systematic error across all the major pollsters.
Oh, sorry, I was reading it as a swing from status quo, not a swing from the polling as baseline.
dv said:
buffy said:
dv said:
One of the dumbest pieces of analysis comes from the Guardian.
Guardian
“Conventional wisdom going into the election was that Labor would win, so Saturday’s result had people scratching their heads about the opinion polls.
But the actual election result was 50.7-49.3, which is within the 3% margin of error for polls that had been calling it for Labor. Only *Queensland * swung further than the margin of error.”
buffy:
This. It’s not a big swing.
dv:
It’s a massive swing. The polling indicated a 3% swing to the ALP (which would have been a very big swing) and the result was a 4% swing away from the ALP. A 7% miss, when the aggregated polling uncertainty was 1%. This makes it a systematic error across all the major pollsters.
Rev:
Please show working.
The last results I looked at (this morning) showed 50.7 Lib 49.3 Lab, as quoted by Guardian.
How is that a 4% swing away?
dv: bolded for clarity
buffy said:
dv said:
buffy said:This. It’s not a big swing.
It’s a massive swing. The polling indicated a 3% swing to the ALP (which would have been a very big swing) and the result was a 4% swing away from the ALP. A 7% miss, when the aggregated polling uncertainty was 1%. This makes it a systematic error across all the major pollsters.
Oh, sorry, I was reading it as a swing from status quo, not a swing from the polling as baseline.
I’m not really interested in how it swings from pre-polling. The more important swing is from status quo.
Things have resiled, nationally, as the prepolls and absentees are counted.
buffy said:
buffy said:
dv said:It’s a massive swing. The polling indicated a 3% swing to the ALP (which would have been a very big swing) and the result was a 4% swing away from the ALP. A 7% miss, when the aggregated polling uncertainty was 1%. This makes it a systematic error across all the major pollsters.
Oh, sorry, I was reading it as a swing from status quo, not a swing from the polling as baseline.
I’m not really interested in how it swings from pre-polling. The more important swing is from status quo.
Fair enough. The 2pp national estimates are in flux as counting continues so I’ll keep my powder dry. That Qld result will continue to be an outlier though. Fkn Qld.
dv said:
buffy said:
buffy said:Oh, sorry, I was reading it as a swing from status quo, not a swing from the polling as baseline.
I’m not really interested in how it swings from pre-polling. The more important swing is from status quo.
Fair enough. The 2pp national estimates are in flux as counting continues so I’ll keep my powder dry. That Qld result will continue to be an outlier though. Fkn Qld.
The Russians got to us.
dv said:
dv said:buffy said:
dv said:
One of the dumbest pieces of analysis comes from the Guardian.
Guardian
“Conventional wisdom going into the election was that Labor would win, so Saturday’s result had people scratching their heads about the opinion polls.
But the actual election result was 50.7-49.3, which is within the 3% margin of error for polls that had been calling it for Labor. Only *Queensland * swung further than the margin of error.”buffy:
This. It’s not a big swing.dv:
It’s a massive swing. The polling indicated a 3% swing to the ALP (which would have been a very big swing) and the result was a 4% swing away from the ALP. A 7% miss, when the aggregated polling uncertainty was 1%. This makes it a systematic error across all the major pollsters.Rev:
Please show working.
The last results I looked at (this morning) showed 50.7 Lib 49.3 Lab, as quoted by Guardian.
How is that a 4% swing away?dv: bolded for clarity
ISDGI, but I shall return to easy stuff, like predicting when soils slopes will slide, or concrete will crack.
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
buffy said:I’m not really interested in how it swings from pre-polling. The more important swing is from status quo.
Fair enough. The 2pp national estimates are in flux as counting continues so I’ll keep my powder dry. That Qld result will continue to be an outlier though. Fkn Qld.
The Russians got to us.
I blame that Green bus tour to Queensland.
Rev: ISDGI
My comments were immediately after a mention of Qld and hence were about Qld, where there was a 4% swing to the lishin.
Here’s how Dr Kevin Bonham sums it up:
What we’ve seen is a massive polling failure and a result that (whatever exactly it is) was not predicted by anybody much to my knowledge, except for the sort of people who predicted Donald Trump. This is looking a lot like a mirror image of the expected result – the Coalition 2PP is tracking for about 51.6% 2PP and about the same number of seats as Labor were expected to get.
But this isn’t the same thing as Trump (where the national polls were more or less right and the serious errors were localised), this is a national total polling failure more similar to Brexit or to recent UK national elections. This after national polls in Australia have been so reliable for so long. Betting markets failed as well – initially expecting Labor to win by more than Labor’s leads at the time showed, and only converging to what the polls were saying in the end. Internal polls failed, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Psephologists failed too, beyond that we warned that the polls were ridiculously herded and therefore couldn’t be trusted.
WTF
WTFF
Grumpy cat look
I blame the sausages!
Thats it, there must have been something bad in the democratic sausages.
Ah well at least Bob didn’t have to see this.
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
buffy said:I’m not really interested in how it swings from pre-polling. The more important swing is from status quo.
Fair enough. The 2pp national estimates are in flux as counting continues so I’ll keep my powder dry. That Qld result will continue to be an outlier though. Fkn Qld.
The Russians got to us.
Australians got lazy and greedy.
It reminds me of the women’s movement – young women saying they are not feminists as they reap the rewards of decades..centuries of protest about rights as we were further suppressed.
People are too caught up in their own tunnel of consumerism and gluttony to look at the person next door who needs some kindness and support from the community.
Then there’s the evangelicals.
I really have tried to care about people, but I don’t and can’t anymore. I have had much experience working with very diverse families and those kids are now well into adulthood, voting along the lines of the family of origin.
Anyway – I have banana and custard. The wrong custard apparently, but it’s the best I can do.
Tau.Neutrino said:
WTFWTFF
Grumpy cat look
I blame the sausages!
Thats it, there must have been something bad in the democratic sausages.
We bought some Polish sausages today and I asked in a loud voice….“Democracy sausages for dinner, dear?” The local yanks had nfi what I was on about.
dv said:
Ah well at least Bob didn’t have to see this.
True
Just keep repeating…Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat. My new calming mantra.
I’d like to say that I personally put LNP as my third preference on the green sheet. Only because One Nation, UAP, and Fraser Anning took up the last three places. We had 6 candidates.
So don’t blame me.
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
WTFWTFF
Grumpy cat look
I blame the sausages!
Thats it, there must have been something bad in the democratic sausages.
We bought some Polish sausages today and I asked in a loud voice….“Democracy sausages for dinner, dear?” The local yanks had nfi what I was on about.
Bwahahahahaha
kii said:
Australians got lazy and greedy.It reminds me of the women’s movement – young women saying they are not feminists as they reap the rewards of decades..centuries of protest about rights as we were further suppressed.
People are too caught up in their own tunnel of consumerism and gluttony to look at the person next door who needs some kindness and support from the community.
ditto Union membership.
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
WTFWTFF
Grumpy cat look
I blame the sausages!
Thats it, there must have been something bad in the democratic sausages.
We bought some Polish sausages today and I asked in a loud voice….“Democracy sausages for dinner, dear?” The local yanks had nfi what I was on about.
It was Peter Dutton.
Peter Dutton added something to the sausages when no one was looking.
I blame him.
Divine Angel said:
I’d like to say that I personally put LNP as my third preference on the green sheet. Only because One Nation, UAP, and Fraser Anning took up the last three places. We had 6 candidates.So don’t blame me.
points. it’s all your fault!
ChrispenEvan said:
kii said:
Australians got lazy and greedy.It reminds me of the women’s movement – young women saying they are not feminists as they reap the rewards of decades..centuries of protest about rights as we were further suppressed.
People are too caught up in their own tunnel of consumerism and gluttony to look at the person next door who needs some kindness and support from the community.
ditto Union membership.
YESYESYES!!!!!!!!!!
Really glad I have no grandchildren or young kids. Sorry, DA et al.
I am happy that Tony Abbott lost his seat.
Tau.Neutrino said:
I am happy that Tony Abbott lost his seat.
Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat.
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I am happy that Tony Abbott lost his seat.Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat.
And Peta Credlin has lost her chance to wreak her own viciousness on so many in Canberra. That’s a double win.
buffy said:
The more important swing is from status quo.
Well okay but even if there were a 0% swing nationally, the Coalition would have been returned.
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I am happy that Tony Abbott lost his seat.Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat.
And Peta Credlin has lost her chance to wreak her own viciousness on so many in Canberra. That’s a double win.
Yes, your right, must be a collective relief there.
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I am happy that Tony Abbott lost his seat.Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat.
And Peta Credlin has lost her chance to wreak her own viciousness on so many in Canberra. That’s a double win.
The what?
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat…..Tony Abbott lost his seat.
And Peta Credlin has lost her chance to wreak her own viciousness on so many in Canberra. That’s a double win.
The what?
Dark Lord Peta Credlin is Darth Abbotts apprentice.
Tau.Neutrino said:
kii said:
captain_spalding said:And Peta Credlin has lost her chance to wreak her own viciousness on so many in Canberra. That’s a double win.
The what?
Dark Lord Peta Credlin is Darth Abbotts apprentice.
Yes, but was she running for a seat? Don’t make me Google. A simply answer is best.
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
kii said:The what?
Dark Lord Peta Credlin is Darth Abbotts apprentice.
Yes, but was she running for a seat? Don’t make me Google. A simply answer is best.
No she wasn’t.
dv said:
buffy said:The more important swing is from status quo.Well okay but even if there were a 0% swing nationally, the Coalition would have been returned.
Last time Lib 2PP vote was 50.4%, and it is currently 50.9%, so result is 0.5% swing to Lib compared with predicted 1.5% swing to Lab.
Since there was a much larger swing to Lib in Qld, the rest of the country must have been about right.
So probably all down to Adani and the Palmer effect.
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
kii said:The what?
Dark Lord Peta Credlin is Darth Abbotts apprentice.
Yes, but was she running for a seat? Don’t make me Google. A simply answer is best.
A media spot I think.
roughbarked said:
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:Dark Lord Peta Credlin is Darth Abbotts apprentice.
Yes, but was she running for a seat? Don’t make me Google. A simply answer is best.
No she wasn’t.
Ta,
This is appropriate for some people:
I was expecting Peter Dutton to lose his seat.
His electorate must have a population of mean people like him.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
buffy said:The more important swing is from status quo.Well okay but even if there were a 0% swing nationally, the Coalition would have been returned.
Last time Lib 2PP vote was 50.4%, and it is currently 50.9%, so result is 0.5% swing to Lib compared with predicted 1.5% swing to Lab.
Since there was a much larger swing to Lib in Qld, the rest of the country must have been about right.
The ALP were hoping for a few pickups in Victoria but it didn’t work out that way: they gained votes in divisions where it did not help them.
So probably all down to Adani and the Palmer effect.
Yeah that’s probably the explanation for the swing but (shrugs) why did the Adani and Palmer effect show in the polls? They weren’t sudden developments. Even the exit polls yesterday did not pick it up. It’s funny.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/more-sports/sportsbet-makes-monumental-and-costly-error-ahead-of-election/news-story/2ec8205b29d4c1d591b022803915c8ea
Sportsbet were so confident for Labor to win, they paid out $1.3m to punters two days early. Based on bets coming in, they predicted Labor to win 83 seats.
Divine Angel said:
https://www.foxsports.com.au/more-sports/sportsbet-makes-monumental-and-costly-error-ahead-of-election/news-story/2ec8205b29d4c1d591b022803915c8eaSportsbet were so confident for Labor to win, they paid out $1.3m to punters two days early. Based on bets coming in, they predicted Labor to win 83 seats.
Ha.
I honestly don’t know why they do that shit. What’s the advantage?
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:Last time Lib 2PP vote was 50.4%, and it is currently 50.9%, so result is 0.5% swing to Lib compared with predicted 1.5% swing to Lab.
Since there was a much larger swing to Lib in Qld, the rest of the country must have been about right.
That’s a fair statement, though can probably say that Tasmania did not go as expected.The ALP were hoping for a few pickups in Victoria but it didn’t work out that way: they gained votes in divisions where it did not help them.
So probably all down to Adani and the Palmer effect.
Yeah that’s probably the explanation for the swing but (shrugs) why did the Adani and Palmer effect show in the polls? They weren’t sudden developments. Even the exit polls yesterday did not pick it up. It’s funny.
I live in the Franklin bubble.
I wonder whether the PM is quietly glad to have Abbott out of the way…
dv said:
I wonder whether the PM is quietly glad to have Abbott out of the way…
I wonder what the suicide rate is today.
there’s gotta be people out there in worse nick than self.
kii said:
roughbarked said:
kii said:Yes, but was she running for a seat? Don’t make me Google. A simply answer is best.
No she wasn’t.
Ta,
This is appropriate for some people:
This.
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:Last time Lib 2PP vote was 50.4%, and it is currently 50.9%, so result is 0.5% swing to Lib compared with predicted 1.5% swing to Lab.
Since there was a much larger swing to Lib in Qld, the rest of the country must have been about right.
That’s a fair statement, though can probably say that Tasmania did not go as expected.The ALP were hoping for a few pickups in Victoria but it didn’t work out that way: they gained votes in divisions where it did not help them.
So probably all down to Adani and the Palmer effect.
Yeah that’s probably the explanation for the swing but (shrugs) why did the Adani and Palmer effect show in the polls? They weren’t sudden developments. Even the exit polls yesterday did not pick it up. It’s funny.
People tell porkies?
dv said:
I wonder whether the PM is quietly glad to have Abbott out of the way…
Is the Pope a Catholic?
Mrs V and I and our visitor are extremely disappointed. Very, very, very sad.
Labor had the popular vote didn’t they?
There was disunity in the liberal party wasn’t there?
Well naturally I’m happy with the result but a lot of people are disappointed and I sympathies for them.
But Triumph and Disaster and all that stuff.
Did Clive Palmer get any value for his $60 million?
Tau.Neutrino said:
Did Clive Palmer get any value for his $60 million?
Well Morrison did.
Peak Warming Man said:
Well naturally I’m happy with the result but a lot of people are disappointed and I sympathies for them.
But Triumph and Disaster and all that stuff.
Silver linings. Abbott’s gone and hopefully his style of governing goes with him. Fraser Anning got shitcanned, got about 1% in the senate. Clive got nowt for his troubles.
I really did want that federal crime and corruption watchdog so I’m disappointed about that missed opportunity.
Somehow it feels like the last American election.
The people have spoken. The bastards.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
I wonder whether the PM is quietly glad to have Abbott out of the way…
I wonder what the suicide rate is today.
there’s gotta be people out there in worse nick than self.
I was wondering how you are.
😯
Peak Warming Man said:
Well naturally I’m happy with the result but a lot of people are disappointed and I sympathies for them.
But Triumph and Disaster and all that stuff.
Surely your vote for Anning’s team was wasted.
ChrispenEvan said:
kii said:
Australians got lazy and greedy.It reminds me of the women’s movement – young women saying they are not feminists as they reap the rewards of decades..centuries of protest about rights as we were further suppressed.
People are too caught up in their own tunnel of consumerism and gluttony to look at the person next door who needs some kindness and support from the community.
ditto Union membership.
This. You don’t need unions….until you need a union.
btm said:
The people have spoken. The bastards.
There was something added to the democratic sausages.
Peak Warming Man said:
Well naturally I’m happy with the result but a lot of people are disappointed and I sympathies for them.
But Triumph and Disaster and all that stuff.
Is that because you don’t care about other people or are you doing one of your “jokey” posts?
dv said:
buffy said:The more important swing is from status quo.Well okay but even if there were a 0% swing nationally, the Coalition would have been returned.
Um, yes…because they are the status quo.
kii said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
I wonder whether the PM is quietly glad to have Abbott out of the way…
I wonder what the suicide rate is today.
there’s gotta be people out there in worse nick than self.
I was wondering how you are.
😯
I cancelled en plein air for tomorrow. I am not feeling very social and sitting in the cold and rain for hours won’t help.
Michael V said:
kii said:
roughbarked said:No she wasn’t.
Ta,
This is appropriate for some people:
This.
I wish I wasn’t so scared of the outside world. I would love to channel some female power from my mother and sister and don my Amazonian* armour. *My brothers called me The Amazon when I was a teen.
I’m utterly disgusted with the people in the Division of Dickson.
I’m taking that whole electorate off the visiting map.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Well naturally I’m happy with the result but a lot of people are disappointed and I sympathies for them.
But Triumph and Disaster and all that stuff.
Silver linings. Abbott’s gone and hopefully his style of governing goes with him. Fraser Anning got shitcanned, got about 1% in the senate. Clive got nowt for his troubles.
I really did want that federal crime and corruption watchdog so I’m disappointed about that missed opportunity.
Ta.
What is a “federal crime and corruption watchdog”? If it doesn’t allow wiretaps of secret meetings what use would it be?
This is the longest thread ever in this forum and its predecessor,
with the possible exception of one or two chat threads.
dv said:
I wonder whether the PM is quietly glad to have Abbott out of the way…
Quietly. Pmsl. The entire front bench is partying.
Tamb said:
poikilotherm said:
dv said:
Seems there was a 3.2% polling miss in the national 2pp. Utterly unprecedented. To put it into context, normally a 1% miss would be considered very bad.
So that link I posted the other day was right about the polls being improbable?
Polls are still landline based. Generally only old people use landlines thus the sample is skewed.
Polls are skewed because everybody they ask replies with “mind your own f?!kin business”. Polls deserve to be banned.
The election was won by ScoMo simple as that.
He was brilliant, his speech in the pouring rain under the umbrella on Bob Hawke’s death was exceptional, another pivotal moment when quizzed by Leigh Sales on what faction would run the Liberal Party after election, he simply said ‘ I will’. That was telling.
You can argue back and forth about all the machinations that an election entails but at the end of the day this was ScoMo’s victory, he and he alone carried the day.
Peak Warming Man said:
The election was won by ScoMo simple as that.
He was brilliant, his speech in the pouring rain under the umbrella on Bob Hawke’s death was exceptional, another pivotal moment when quizzed by Leigh Sales on what faction would run the Liberal Party after election, he simply said ‘ I will’. That was telling.You can argue back and forth about all the machinations that an election entails but at the end of the day this was ScoMo’s victory, he and he alone carried the day.
Fuck off.
buffy said:
dv said:
buffy said:The more important swing is from status quo.Well okay but even if there were a 0% swing nationally, the Coalition would have been returned.
Um, yes…because they are the status quo.
Right.
Peak Warming Man said:
The election was won by ScoMo simple as that.
He was brilliant, his speech in the pouring rain under the umbrella on Bob Hawke’s death was exceptional, another pivotal moment when quizzed by Leigh Sales on what faction would run the Liberal Party after election, he simply said ‘ I will’. That was telling.You can argue back and forth about all the machinations that an election entails but at the end of the day this was ScoMo’s victory, he and he alone carried the day.
Which in itself is a bit of an indictment of democracy.
kii said:
Fridge magnet
I want to make up a fridge magnet for the holiday forum party. I so want to.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Well naturally I’m happy with the result but a lot of people are disappointed and I sympathies for them.
But Triumph and Disaster and all that stuff.
Silver linings. Abbott’s gone and hopefully his style of governing goes with him. Fraser Anning got shitcanned, got about 1% in the senate. Clive got nowt for his troubles.
I really did want that federal crime and corruption watchdog so I’m disappointed about that missed opportunity.
Clive will get his great big mine next to Adani’s, not nowt.
The prospect of a good federal ICAC is what I am really gutted about. Though the Libs will put a nice toothless one in.
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:What is a “federal crime and corruption watchdog”?
An independent agency of the Government responsible for eliminating and investigating corrupt activities and enhancing the integrity of the public administration in Australia, as was supported by the opposition and all minor parties and independents and opposed only by the Coalition. You should check the news sometimes.
Peak Warming Man said:
The election was won by ScoMo simple as that.
He was brilliant, his speech in the pouring rain under the umbrella on Bob Hawke’s death was exceptional, another pivotal moment when quizzed by Leigh Sales on what faction would run the Liberal Party after election, he simply said ‘ I will’. That was telling.You can argue back and forth about all the machinations that an election entails but at the end of the day this was ScoMo’s victory, he and he alone carried the day.
He’s a dick and a fraud.
buffy said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The election was won by ScoMo simple as that.
He was brilliant, his speech in the pouring rain under the umbrella on Bob Hawke’s death was exceptional, another pivotal moment when quizzed by Leigh Sales on what faction would run the Liberal Party after election, he simply said ‘ I will’. That was telling.You can argue back and forth about all the machinations that an election entails but at the end of the day this was ScoMo’s victory, he and he alone carried the day.
Which in itself is a bit of an indictment of democracy.
True. The TV advertising campaigns for all four of the biggest parties were all abysmal. Take UA for example, the slogan “make australia great” is a direct ripoff of Trump’s “make america great” which in turn is a direct ripoff of Thatcher’s “make Britain great again”. Clive Palmer is aligning himself with two of the worst ever politicians in history.
mollwollfumble said:
kii said:
Fridge magnet
I want to make up a fridge magnet for the holiday forum party. I so want to.
Why not base it on one of those…um…social contact diagrams that someone made?
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:What is a “federal crime and corruption watchdog”?
An independent agency of the Government responsible for eliminating and investigating corrupt activities and enhancing the integrity of the public administration in Australia, as was supported by the opposition and all minor parties and independents and opposed only by the Coalition. You should check the news sometimes.
So, it wouldn’t actually have any powers?
kii said:
mollwollfumble said:
kii said:
Fridge magnet
I want to make up a fridge magnet for the holiday forum party. I so want to.
Why not base it on one of those…um…social contact diagrams that someone made?
This thread is 5 hours long. What, when and who?
As for reading the news, i don’t because i’d rather not spend all of my days in a cold fury.
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:What is a “federal crime and corruption watchdog”?
An independent agency of the Government responsible for eliminating and investigating corrupt activities and enhancing the integrity of the public administration in Australia, as was supported by the opposition and all minor parties and independents and opposed only by the Coalition. You should check the news sometimes.
So, it wouldn’t actually have any powers?
Fuck are you talking about? It would have tremendous powers. It’s the federal equivalent of the state based ICACs. Surely you’re familiar with this concept.
mollwollfumble said:
kii said:
mollwollfumble said:I want to make up a fridge magnet for the holiday forum party. I so want to.
Why not base it on one of those…um…social contact diagrams that someone made?
This thread is 5 hours long. What, when and who?
As for reading the news, i don’t because i’d rather not spend all of my days in a cold fury.
What?
kii said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The election was won by ScoMo simple as that.
He was brilliant, his speech in the pouring rain under the umbrella on Bob Hawke’s death was exceptional, another pivotal moment when quizzed by Leigh Sales on what faction would run the Liberal Party after election, he simply said ‘ I will’. That was telling.You can argue back and forth about all the machinations that an election entails but at the end of the day this was ScoMo’s victory, he and he alone carried the day.
Fuck off.
ROFL
sibeen said:
kii said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The election was won by ScoMo simple as that.
He was brilliant, his speech in the pouring rain under the umbrella on Bob Hawke’s death was exceptional, another pivotal moment when quizzed by Leigh Sales on what faction would run the Liberal Party after election, he simply said ‘ I will’. That was telling.You can argue back and forth about all the machinations that an election entails but at the end of the day this was ScoMo’s victory, he and he alone carried the day.
Fuck off.
ROFL
Tamb said:
sibeen said:
kii said:Fuck off.
ROFL
IMO Lab lost because the voters preferred Scomo. They did’n look into policy they just voted against Shorty.
You know, I think it’s still called the ALP.
kii said:
Tamb said:
sibeen said:ROFL
IMO Lab lost because the voters preferred Scomo. They did’n look into policy they just voted against Shorty.
You know, I think it’s still called the ALP.
In this case it was an unclimbable Alp
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:An independent agency of the Government responsible for eliminating and investigating corrupt activities and enhancing the integrity of the public administration in Australia, as was supported by the opposition and all minor parties and independents and opposed only by the Coalition. You should check the news sometimes.
So, it wouldn’t actually have any powers?
Fuck are you talking about? It would have tremendous powers. It’s the federal equivalent of the state based ICACs. Surely you’re familiar with this concept.
Actually no.
Have the ICACs stopped corruption in state politics?
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:So, it wouldn’t actually have any powers?
Fuck are you talking about? It would have tremendous powers. It’s the federal equivalent of the state based ICACs. Surely you’re familiar with this concept.
Actually no.
Have the ICACs stopped corruption in state politics?
Where they exist they’ve put the brakes on, yes. NSW used to be a cesspool and now it is a mere shithole.
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:So, it wouldn’t actually have any powers?
Fuck are you talking about? It would have tremendous powers. It’s the federal equivalent of the state based ICACs. Surely you’re familiar with this concept.
Actually no.
Have the ICACs stopped corruption in state politics?
The NSW one was doing quite well till the Libs were about to be in the firing line, so they nobbled it.
Actually…counts forum members past and present….lots of Queenslanders.
kii said:
Tamb said:
sibeen said:ROFL
IMO Lab lost because the voters preferred Scomo. They did’n look into policy they just voted against Shorty.
You know, I think it’s still called the ALP.
Shorten’s an idiot. I said so when he first became Labor leader and i’ve seen no reason to revise my viewpoint since. There is at least one intelligent person in the Labor party, but i have no idea who that is.
I just read some news….I see Indi is staying independent.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/federal-election-helen-haines-wins-indi-replaces-cathy-mcgowan/11126690
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:Fuck are you talking about? It would have tremendous powers. It’s the federal equivalent of the state based ICACs. Surely you’re familiar with this concept.
Actually no.
Have the ICACs stopped corruption in state politics?
Where they exist they’ve put the brakes on, yes. NSW used to be a cesspool and now it is a mere shithole.
Thanks! I like ICACs very much then.
On the other hand some of the reporting has been over the top. Labor was not “trounced” or wiped out. The Coalition are on track to pick up 2 seats, net. Pretty good chance they’ll still be a minority government.
They’ve lost a bit of ground in the Senate.
dv said:
On the other hand some of the reporting has been over the top. Labor was not “trounced” or wiped out. The Coalition are on track to pick up 2 seats, net. Pretty good chance they’ll still be a minority government.They’ve lost a bit of ground in the Senate.
So we still have a “house of review” then?
dv said:
On the other hand some of the reporting has been over the top. Labor was not “trounced” or wiped out. The Coalition are on track to pick up 2 seats, net. Pretty good chance they’ll still be a minority government.They’ve lost a bit of ground in the Senate.
> They’ve lost a bit of ground in the Senate.
Good.
dv said:
On the other hand some of the reporting has been over the top. Labor was not “trounced” or wiped out. The Coalition are on track to pick up 2 seats, net. Pretty good chance they’ll still be a minority government.They’ve lost a bit of ground in the Senate.
I hope they’ve done their Section 44 homework or we could get back to tores.
dv said:
On the other hand some of the reporting has been over the top. Labor was not “trounced” or wiped out. The Coalition are on track to pick up 2 seats, net. Pretty good chance they’ll still be a minority government.They’ve lost a bit of ground in the Senate.
Senate counting stuff at the aec here:
https://tallyroom.aec.gov.au/SenateStateResultsMenu-24310.htm
There is a lot of counting to do yet.
buffy said:
I just read some news….I see Indi is staying independent.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/federal-election-helen-haines-wins-indi-replaces-cathy-mcgowan/11126690
Phelps has faded in Wentworth in later counting
Senate informals in Victoria are around 7% at the moment. Is that a good figure?
buffy said:
Senate informals in Victoria are around 7% at the moment. Is that a good figure?
About normal these days
buffy said:
Senate informals in Victoria are around 7% at the moment. Is that a good figure?
Probably not considering the hicks in the styx here managed 5% informal.
dv said:
buffy said:Senate informals in Victoria are around 7% at the moment. Is that a good figure?
About normal these days
Yes, I just looked at a couple of other states, similar. NSW is about 9%, but the others are 5 or 6%
Assuming governments don’t get to them first you could possible get good poll predictions from social media bots scanning activity.
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:Actually no.
Have the ICACs stopped corruption in state politics?
Where they exist they’ve put the brakes on, yes. NSW used to be a cesspool and now it is a mere shithole.
Thanks! I like ICACs very much then.
I wonder if the anti-corruption thing can be streamlined and speeded up.
Eg. If everybody already knows who is the most corrupt member of parliament then they could be rounded up and sacked after less than a day’s investigation.
Even faster, given that every PM, State Premier and US Pesident automatically chooses the most corrupt person they can for second in command, just sack the deputy PM, deputy President and deputy Premier to clean up politics.
poikilotherm said:
buffy said:Senate informals in Victoria are around 7% at the moment. Is that a good figure?
Probably not considering the hicks in the styx here managed 5% informal.
You can only get statewide informals for the Senate, can’t you? Are you talking about lower house?
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
Yes, this is weird.
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
So it is clear who Clive wants in Government?
roughbarked said:
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
So it is clear who Clive wants in Government?
Adani Mining CEO Lucas Dow?
buffy said:
dv said:
On the other hand some of the reporting has been over the top. Labor was not “trounced” or wiped out. The Coalition are on track to pick up 2 seats, net. Pretty good chance they’ll still be a minority government.They’ve lost a bit of ground in the Senate.
Senate counting stuff at the aec here:
https://tallyroom.aec.gov.au/SenateStateResultsMenu-24310.htm
There is a lot of counting to do yet.
Hmm, i voted “australian workers party” first preference. 0.28%.
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
Clive spent the 60 million to help the libs.
Fat Bastard.
roughbarked said:
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
So it is clear who Clive wants in Government?
I wonder what secret deal is in place?
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
Maybe the AEC should cap minor parties being funded by self obsessed rich people.
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
Maybe the AEC should cap minor parties being funded by self obsessed rich people.
buffy said:
I just read some news….I see Indi is staying independent.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/federal-election-helen-haines-wins-indi-replaces-cathy-mcgowan/11126690
Still 7 seats in the balance, 73-65. I’m really hoping for it to be seriously close. Oh the ensuing tooth gnashing of having to wrangle with independant women….
ruby said:
buffy said:I just read some news….I see Indi is staying independent.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/federal-election-helen-haines-wins-indi-replaces-cathy-mcgowan/11126690
Still 7 seats in the balance, 73-65. I’m really hoping for it to be seriously close. Oh the ensuing tooth gnashing of having to wrangle with independant women….
I like this story. What happens next?
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
Maybe the AEC should cap minor parties being funded by self obsessed rich people.
Clive Palmer is another Rupert Murdoch.
Using a wall of ads instead of newspapers.
kii said:
ruby said:
buffy said:I just read some news….I see Indi is staying independent.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/federal-election-helen-haines-wins-indi-replaces-cathy-mcgowan/11126690
Still 7 seats in the balance, 73-65. I’m really hoping for it to be seriously close. Oh the ensuing tooth gnashing of having to wrangle with independant women….
I like this story. What happens next?
Australia falls to The Women’s Party at the next election?
https://thewomensparty.org.au/
ruby said:
kii said:
ruby said:Still 7 seats in the balance, 73-65. I’m really hoping for it to be seriously close. Oh the ensuing tooth gnashing of having to wrangle with independant women….
I like this story. What happens next?
Australia falls to The Women’s Party at the next election?
https://thewomensparty.org.au/
Cool.
We need media reform or more media regulation.
To stop Fat Bastard doing that totally biased ad campaign again.
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
I don’t know what the advertising was like, I really managed to miss every single piece of it, so cannot comment from personal experience; but from listening to Penny Wong last evening she gave me the impression that the UAP advertising attacked both major parties.
Tamb said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
Maybe the AEC should cap minor parties being funded by self obsessed rich people.
Better still. Cap all parties.
Yes.
dv said:
buffy said:I just read some news….I see Indi is staying independent.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/federal-election-helen-haines-wins-indi-replaces-cathy-mcgowan/11126690
Phelps has faded in Wentworth in later counting
Pity.
mollwollfumble said:
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:Where they exist they’ve put the brakes on, yes. NSW used to be a cesspool and now it is a mere shithole.
Thanks! I like ICACs very much then.
I wonder if the anti-corruption thing can be streamlined and speeded up.
Eg. If everybody already knows who is the most corrupt member of parliament then they could be rounded up and sacked after less than a day’s investigation.
Even faster, given that every PM, State Premier and US Pesident automatically chooses the most corrupt person they can for second in command, just sack the deputy PM, deputy President and deputy Premier to clean up politics.
What a weird thing to say.
Michael V said:
dv said:
buffy said:I just read some news….I see Indi is staying independent.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/federal-election-helen-haines-wins-indi-replaces-cathy-mcgowan/11126690
Phelps has faded in Wentworth in later counting
Pity.
I don’t understand the love for her. She’s a nutter.
Australia’s screwed anyway, even the koalas are giving up the ghost.
sibeen said:
Michael V said:
dv said:Phelps has faded in Wentworth in later counting
Pity.
I don’t understand the love for her. She’s a nutter.
I don’t love her, not for one moment, but I love the L/NP a whole lot less, and I hope she continues to disrupt them.
Bubblecar said:
Australia’s screwed anyway, even the koalas are giving up the ghost.
I take it that you are generously subscribing to the WWF Save the Koalas campaign, where they will relieve you of $15 month, but will send you a furry koala toy, plus a newsletter, when the Koala is ONLY in danger of LOCAL extinction.
sibeen said:
dv said:
It certainly was a weird election in which the major parties each spent 10 million and a minor party spent more like 80 million but only criticised the ALP rather than the government. I did not see any UAP material that ran negative against the government at all. The ALP doesn’t have that kind of money.
I don’t know what the advertising was like, I really managed to miss every single piece of it, so cannot comment from personal experience; but from listening to Penny Wong last evening she gave me the impression that the UAP advertising attacked both major parties.
If they did, I didn’t see it.
The only UAP ads I saw were double page spreads every day in the SMH with exactly the same wording, an outright lie about taxation, and a personal attack on Shorten.
Say what you will, Morrison, the ad man ran a brilliant campaign.
I too believe in mackerels!
Ian said:
Say what you will, Morrison, the ad man ran a brilliant campaign.I too believe in mackerels!
Depends how you rate honesty, although a slippery concept with most politicians. Still not good and should not be rewarded with praise. It was not that much different than Abbott’s Carbon Tax campaign that rated him a brilliant opposition leader, never mind how destructive it really was.
Morrison was certainly effectively repackaged. From a sinister right-wing Christian weirdo who’s only ever shown any concern for the rich, he quickly became “Uncle Scomo”, everyone’s grinning bogan neighbour and ol’ mate.
Michael V said:
sibeen said:
Michael V said:Pity.
I don’t understand the love for her. She’s a nutter.
I don’t love her, not for one moment, but I love the L/NP a whole lot less, and I hope she continues to disrupt them.
I don’t understand that. She’s a person who promotes homeopathy and other such woo. I wouldn’t vote for her if Beelzebub was the opposition candidate.
Don’t know about ScoMo being long term as some predict, he’s good but the Libs lack of depth of talent was pretty obvious in this election and the Nats are going nowhere under their current leader.
The Labs have better depth but it stops at Tanya and Albo, cant cop Bowen or Wong, both sides need some rejuvenation and unless that happens both the upper and lower houses will increasingly come under the thrall of independents.
Whether that’s a good or bad thing I’m not sure.
I think Albo would be good for Labor he’s old school and he wont play in the same sandpit as the Libs like Shorten did.
sibeen said:
Michael V said:
sibeen said:I don’t understand the love for her. She’s a nutter.
I don’t love her, not for one moment, but I love the L/NP a whole lot less, and I hope she continues to disrupt them.
I don’t understand that. She’s a person who promotes homeopathy and other such woo. I wouldn’t vote for her if Beelzebub was the opposition candidate.
Won the Bent Spoon Award from the Australian Skeptics, IIRC
Neophyte said:
sibeen said:
Michael V said:I don’t love her, not for one moment, but I love the L/NP a whole lot less, and I hope she continues to disrupt them.
I don’t understand that. She’s a person who promotes homeopathy and other such woo. I wouldn’t vote for her if Beelzebub was the opposition candidate.
Won the Bent Spoon Award from the Australian Skeptics, IIRC
Yep, she won that back in 2008. I put Australian Health (anti-vaxxers) dead last on my senate ballot. If she was running for the senate in Vic she would have been down there with them.
Peak Warming Man said:
Don’t know about ScoMo being long term as some predict, he’s good but the Libs lack of depth of talent was pretty obvious in this election and the Nats are going nowhere under their current leader.The Labs have better depth but it stops at Tanya and Albo, cant cop Bowen or Wong, both sides need some rejuvenation and unless that happens both the upper and lower houses will increasingly come under the thrall of independents.
Whether that’s a good or bad thing I’m not sure.
I think Albo would be good for Labor he’s old school and he wont play in the same sandpit as the Libs like Shorten did.
I think he has some issues with some ‘massage’ parlours he visited, on camera.
poikilotherm said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Don’t know about ScoMo being long term as some predict, he’s good but the Libs lack of depth of talent was pretty obvious in this election and the Nats are going nowhere under their current leader.The Labs have better depth but it stops at Tanya and Albo, cant cop Bowen or Wong, both sides need some rejuvenation and unless that happens both the upper and lower houses will increasingly come under the thrall of independents.
Whether that’s a good or bad thing I’m not sure.
I think Albo would be good for Labor he’s old school and he wont play in the same sandpit as the Libs like Shorten did.
I think he has some issues with some ‘massage’ parlours he visited, on camera.
he = Albo
poikilotherm said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Don’t know about ScoMo being long term as some predict, he’s good but the Libs lack of depth of talent was pretty obvious in this election and the Nats are going nowhere under their current leader.The Labs have better depth but it stops at Tanya and Albo, cant cop Bowen or Wong, both sides need some rejuvenation and unless that happens both the upper and lower houses will increasingly come under the thrall of independents.
Whether that’s a good or bad thing I’m not sure.
I think Albo would be good for Labor he’s old school and he wont play in the same sandpit as the Libs like Shorten did.
I think he has some issues with some ‘massage’ parlours he visited, on camera.
He’d be shoein in France.
poikilotherm said:
poikilotherm said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Don’t know about ScoMo being long term as some predict, he’s good but the Libs lack of depth of talent was pretty obvious in this election and the Nats are going nowhere under their current leader.The Labs have better depth but it stops at Tanya and Albo, cant cop Bowen or Wong, both sides need some rejuvenation and unless that happens both the upper and lower houses will increasingly come under the thrall of independents.
Whether that’s a good or bad thing I’m not sure.
I think Albo would be good for Labor he’s old school and he wont play in the same sandpit as the Libs like Shorten did.
I think he has some issues with some ‘massage’ parlours he visited, on camera.
he = Albo
Please tell me more.
Neophyte said:
sibeen said:
Michael V said:I don’t love her, not for one moment, but I love the L/NP a whole lot less, and I hope she continues to disrupt them.
I don’t understand that. She’s a person who promotes homeopathy and other such woo. I wouldn’t vote for her if Beelzebub was the opposition candidate.
Won the Bent Spoon Award from the Australian Skeptics, IIRC
What do homeopathy believers drink, anyway?
It can’t be water. You’d never know what the water ‘remembers’, and the effects get stronger the more you dilute whatever it was, so you could be swallowing a lethal dose of just about anything.
captain_spalding said:
Neophyte said:
sibeen said:I don’t understand that. She’s a person who promotes homeopathy and other such woo. I wouldn’t vote for her if Beelzebub was the opposition candidate.
Won the Bent Spoon Award from the Australian Skeptics, IIRC
What do homeopathy believers drink, anyway?
It can’t be water. You’d never know what the water ‘remembers’, and the effects get stronger the more you dilute whatever it was, so you could be swallowing a lethal dose of just about anything.
Apparently a great deal of it is piss. You can take that where you please.
‘Morrison can thank UAP’s ‘Shifty Shorten’ ads for returning him to Lodge, Palmer says ‘ – ABC News
‘Businessman and former senator Clive Palmer failed to pick up a single seat in the election, but he says his $60 million advertising campaign is behind Labor’s defeat.’
I predicted last night that Palmer would not be slow in claiming that the L/NP owe him a debt of some kind.
the dog.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/19/scott-morrison-had-a-government-defined-by-five-years-of-chaos-and-he-still-beat-labor-by-himself
Michael V said:
poikilotherm said:
poikilotherm said:I think he has some issues with some ‘massage’ parlours he visited, on camera.
he = Albo
Please tell me more.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=albanese+massage+parlour
Sharma is now 1000 in front in Wentworth so Phelps might have to go back to her day job.
The Libs are also about a grand up in Boothby.
Labor has made up a bunch of ground in Bass, and are now level in Chisholm, and ahead in Cowan, Lilley and Macquarie.
sarahs mum said:
the dog.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/19/scott-morrison-had-a-government-defined-by-five-years-of-chaos-and-he-still-beat-labor-by-himself
The Dog is right, of course.
Labor have just lost the unloseable election.
They have to re-invent themselves, and stop presenting themselves as almost-but-not-quite-exactly-the-same-as-the L/NP.
They need to stop denying the unions, and embrace them, because it was the spirit of unionisim that began the Labor party, and got it into its most effective form.
They have to emphasise that they’re the party for not-the-billionaires, and if that upsets Murdoch, then damn the torpedoes and full steam ahead.
I despair. Just chatted with a retired armed services person who is still in the reserve and returns as a trainer in his area of expertise periodically. So not a dumb person. Had no idea about preferential voting. Said he put a 1 in a box, might have put a 2. Was surprised when we told him his vote would not be counted as that was an informal vote. Goodness knows what he did with the Senate ballot paper. There have been ads. The returning officer explained to each and every voter at the booth (yes, friend admitted it had been explained to him at the booth). Really and truly. I despair.
buffy said:
I despair. Just chatted with a retired armed services person who is still in the reserve and returns as a trainer in his area of expertise periodically. So not a dumb person. Had no idea about preferential voting. Said he put a 1 in a box, might have put a 2. Was surprised when we told him his vote would not be counted as that was an informal vote. Goodness knows what he did with the Senate ballot paper. There have been ads. The returning officer explained to each and every voter at the booth (yes, friend admitted it had been explained to him at the booth). Really and truly. I despair.
Sounds like a RAAFie.
Very nice people. Not terribly bright.
sarahs mum said:
the dog.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/19/scott-morrison-had-a-government-defined-by-five-years-of-chaos-and-he-still-beat-labor-by-himself
I blame the Ramsay Centre for the spread of more fascists.
sarahs mum said:
the dog.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/19/scott-morrison-had-a-government-defined-by-five-years-of-chaos-and-he-still-beat-labor-by-himself
By himself + Murdoch, Fat Clive and his $$, the shock jocks, etc. And most importantly of all, the dumdum voters.
buffy said:
I despair. Just chatted with a retired armed services person who is still in the reserve and returns as a trainer in his area of expertise periodically. So not a dumb person. Had no idea about preferential voting. Said he put a 1 in a box, might have put a 2. Was surprised when we told him his vote would not be counted as that was an informal vote. Goodness knows what he did with the Senate ballot paper. There have been ads. The returning officer explained to each and every voter at the booth (yes, friend admitted it had been explained to him at the booth). Really and truly. I despair.
You might be using “not dumb” rather too charitably :)
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:I despair. Just chatted with a retired armed services person who is still in the reserve and returns as a trainer in his area of expertise periodically. So not a dumb person. Had no idea about preferential voting. Said he put a 1 in a box, might have put a 2. Was surprised when we told him his vote would not be counted as that was an informal vote. Goodness knows what he did with the Senate ballot paper. There have been ads. The returning officer explained to each and every voter at the booth (yes, friend admitted it had been explained to him at the booth). Really and truly. I despair.
Sounds like a RAAFie.
Very nice people. Not terribly bright.
Yep :)
All parties need to cap election funding to 10 million.
Bubblecar said:
buffy said:I despair. Just chatted with a retired armed services person who is still in the reserve and returns as a trainer in his area of expertise periodically. So not a dumb person. Had no idea about preferential voting. Said he put a 1 in a box, might have put a 2. Was surprised when we told him his vote would not be counted as that was an informal vote. Goodness knows what he did with the Senate ballot paper. There have been ads. The returning officer explained to each and every voter at the booth (yes, friend admitted it had been explained to him at the booth). Really and truly. I despair.
You might be using “not dumb” rather too charitably :)
In the chance of change, how long have we lived?
sibeen said:
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:I despair. Just chatted with a retired armed services person who is still in the reserve and returns as a trainer in his area of expertise periodically. So not a dumb person. Had no idea about preferential voting. Said he put a 1 in a box, might have put a 2. Was surprised when we told him his vote would not be counted as that was an informal vote. Goodness knows what he did with the Senate ballot paper. There have been ads. The returning officer explained to each and every voter at the booth (yes, friend admitted it had been explained to him at the booth). Really and truly. I despair.
Sounds like a RAAFie.
Very nice people. Not terribly bright.
Yep :)
Mr buffy says no, specialized army.
In fairness Australians have only had 101 years to get the hang of preferential voting with mass campaigns by the AEC every fuckin’ election making sure every single person understands it as well as instructions at the polling booth and indeed on the ballot itself
dv said:
In fairness Australians have only had 101 years to get the hang of preferential voting with mass campaigns by the AEC every fuckin’ election making sure every single person understands it as well as instructions at the polling booth and indeed on the ballot itself
And in the schools. At least when I went to school in the 70s.
dv said:
In fairness Australians have only had 101 years to get the hang of preferential voting with mass campaigns by the AEC every fuckin’ election making sure every single person understands it as well as instructions at the polling booth and indeed on the ballot itself
In this I think you may have grokked my last post. ;)
buffy said:
I despair. Just chatted with a retired armed services person who is still in the reserve and returns as a trainer in his area of expertise periodically. So not a dumb person. Had no idea about preferential voting. Said he put a 1 in a box, might have put a 2. Was surprised when we told him his vote would not be counted as that was an informal vote. Goodness knows what he did with the Senate ballot paper. There have been ads. The returning officer explained to each and every voter at the booth (yes, friend admitted it had been explained to him at the booth). Really and truly. I despair.
Pretty sure just numbering 1 or 2 boxes is a formal vote despite the guidelines.
Ian said:
buffy said:I despair. Just chatted with a retired armed services person who is still in the reserve and returns as a trainer in his area of expertise periodically. So not a dumb person. Had no idea about preferential voting. Said he put a 1 in a box, might have put a 2. Was surprised when we told him his vote would not be counted as that was an informal vote. Goodness knows what he did with the Senate ballot paper. There have been ads. The returning officer explained to each and every voter at the booth (yes, friend admitted it had been explained to him at the booth). Really and truly. I despair.
Pretty sure just numbering 1 or 2 boxes is a formal vote despite the guidelines.
Oh dear
buffy said:
Ian said:
So tell me, what does constitute a valid vote in the Senate?
We were talking reps.
Let’s talk about Reps, baby
Let’s talk about the L/NP
Let’s talk about all the good things
And the bad things that may be
Ian said:
buffy said:I despair. Just chatted with a retired armed services person who is still in the reserve and returns as a trainer in his area of expertise periodically. So not a dumb person. Had no idea about preferential voting. Said he put a 1 in a box, might have put a 2. Was surprised when we told him his vote would not be counted as that was an informal vote. Goodness knows what he did with the Senate ballot paper. There have been ads. The returning officer explained to each and every voter at the booth (yes, friend admitted it had been explained to him at the booth). Really and truly. I despair.
Pretty sure just numbering 1 or 2 boxes is a formal vote despite the guidelines.
Yeah I heard something similar on the wireless a few days ago, it goes to obvious intention or some such they said but I don’t know if they were talking shit or not.
buffy said:
Ian said:
So tell me, what does constitute a valid vote in the Senate?
We were talking reps.
I C
—
For House of Representatives ballot papers the requirement for a formal vote is that every square must contain a consecutive number for all candidates on a ballot paper to be a formal vote (see section 240 of the Electoral Act). This is the instruction that is printed on these ballot papers. However, there is a vote-saving measure that can operate where one square is left blank and where preferences for all other candidates have been marked with a consecutive number.
Ian said:
So tell me, what does constitute a valid vote in the Senate?
We weren’t discussing the senate
There are 8 seats in doubt, all very close.
If Labor wins them all they will form a minority government with the independents.
It’s possible, there are a lot of votes to count in them.
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
Ian said:
So tell me, what does constitute a valid vote in the Senate?
We were talking reps.
Let’s talk about Reps, baby
Let’s talk about the L/NP
Let’s talk about all the good things
And the bad things that may be
Hahahahahaha hahaha
How it was, and of course how it should be….
Is there a rise in fascism in Australia?
We can blame the reason for fascism due to poor education on human rights.
Peak Warming Man said:
There are 8 seats in doubt, all very close.
If Labor wins them all they will form a minority government with the independents.
It’s possible, there are a lot of votes to count in them.
From those that voted early. And trust, voted often.
Peak Warming Man said:
There are 8 seats in doubt, all very close.
If Labor wins them all they will form a minority government with the independents.
It’s possible, there are a lot of votes to count in them.
However Antony has just called Wentworth for the Coalition.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Is there a rise in fascism in Australia?We can blame the reason for fascism due to poor education on human rights.
We can also blame a set of media controlled by a few tyrants who concentrate on giving the population convenient scapegoats so as to distract them from pondering on the real causes of the concerns.
It worked in the 1930s, and it hasn’t lost any of its power.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Is there a rise in fascism in Australia?We can blame the reason for fascism due to poor education on human rights.
We can also blame a set of media controlled by a few tyrants who concentrate on giving the population convenient scapegoats so as to distract them from pondering on the real causes of the concerns.
It worked in the 1930s, and it hasn’t lost any of its power.
Peak Warming Man said:
Peak Warming Man said:
There are 8 seats in doubt, all very close.
If Labor wins them all they will form a minority government with the independents.
It’s possible, there are a lot of votes to count in them.
However Antony has just called Wentworth for the Coalition.
So Kerryn can go back to prescribing tap water for seriously ill patients, then?
Ouch
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/china-state-media-reaction-to-australian-election-result/11128458
Tau.Neutrino said:
Is there a rise in fascism in Australia?We can blame the reason for fascism due to poor education on human rights.
buffy said:
Ouchhttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/china-state-media-reaction-to-australian-election-result/11128458
Oh, the Chinese were going to be snitty no matter what the result. Everything is an affront to China these days.
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Is there a rise in fascism in Australia?We can blame the reason for fascism due to poor education on human rights.
We can also blame a set of media controlled by a few tyrants who concentrate on giving the population convenient scapegoats so as to distract them from pondering on the real causes of the concerns.
It worked in the 1930s, and it hasn’t lost any of its power.
In the face of electoral rejection that analogy would make Labor Nazis.
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Peak Warming Man said:
There are 8 seats in doubt, all very close.
If Labor wins them all they will form a minority government with the independents.
It’s possible, there are a lot of votes to count in them.
However Antony has just called Wentworth for the Coalition.
So Kerryn can go back to prescribing tap water for seriously ill patients, then?
Wait, what?
Rule 303 said:
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:However Antony has just called Wentworth for the Coalition.
So Kerryn can go back to prescribing tap water for seriously ill patients, then?
Wait, what?
Am i confused? Wasn’t Kerryn Phelps in Wentworth?
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Is there a rise in fascism in Australia?We can blame the reason for fascism due to poor education on human rights.
We can also blame a set of media controlled by a few tyrants who concentrate on giving the population convenient scapegoats so as to distract them from pondering on the real causes of the concerns.
It worked in the 1930s, and it hasn’t lost any of its power.
Dangle a few shiny things about, subscribe to Chicken Little’s newsletter and toss a cuppla sixpences at the peasants to scrounge and squabble over, and Scomo’s ya uncle and an election’s your aunt.
AwesomeO said:
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Is there a rise in fascism in Australia?We can blame the reason for fascism due to poor education on human rights.
We can also blame a set of media controlled by a few tyrants who concentrate on giving the population convenient scapegoats so as to distract them from pondering on the real causes of the concerns.
It worked in the 1930s, and it hasn’t lost any of its power.
In the face of electoral rejection that analogy would make Labor Nazis.
As the ALP strive to present themselves as almost -exactly-but-not-quite-as-rightist-as-some-parts-of-the-L/NP, the analogy may not be too far adrift.
captain_spalding said:
Rule 303 said:
captain_spalding said:So Kerryn can go back to prescribing tap water for seriously ill patients, then?
Wait, what?
Am i confused? Wasn’t Kerryn Phelps in Wentworth?
Yes.
sibeen said:
captain_spalding said:
Rule 303 said:Wait, what?
Am i confused? Wasn’t Kerryn Phelps in Wentworth?
Yes.
QED
Libs are 170 votes up in Chisholm but it has been back and forth a bit
captain_spalding said:
sibeen said:
captain_spalding said:Am i confused? Wasn’t Kerryn Phelps in Wentworth?
Yes.
QED
There’s a chance that Rule may not realise how far out there she is. She doesn’t exactly spruik it in her election material.
Tau.Neutrino said:
sarahs mum said:the dog.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/19/scott-morrison-had-a-government-defined-by-five-years-of-chaos-and-he-still-beat-labor-by-himself
I blame the Ramsay Centre for the spread of more fascists.
I’ve never understood. What exactly is a fascist? Obviously not synonymous with Nazi.
dv said:
Libs are 170 votes up in Chisholm but it has been back and forth a bit
So recounts for Bass and Chisholm. I guess there will be others.
Bit sad that Jessica Whelan, who was even too Nazi for the Libs, has managed to score around 14,000 votes in my seat.
Nonetheless Brian Mitchell (ALP) is home & dry.
buffy said:
dv said:
Libs are 170 votes up in Chisholm but it has been back and forth a bit
So recounts for Bass and Chisholm. I guess there will be others.
We’ll see. There are still lots of votes to be counted
captain_spalding said:
Rule 303 said:
captain_spalding said:So Kerryn can go back to prescribing tap water for seriously ill patients, then?
Wait, what?
Am i confused? Wasn’t Kerryn Phelps in Wentworth?
Sorry mate, it was the ‘tapwater for seriously ill patients’ that threw me. I thought she was a GP…?
dv said:
buffy said:
dv said:
Libs are 170 votes up in Chisholm but it has been back and forth a bit
So recounts for Bass and Chisholm. I guess there will be others.
We’ll see. There are still lots of votes to be counted
And Swan could move into the doubtful column depending on the next update, it’s the only one though.
Rule 303 said:
captain_spalding said:
Rule 303 said:Wait, what?
Am i confused? Wasn’t Kerryn Phelps in Wentworth?
Sorry mate, it was the ‘tapwater for seriously ill patients’ that threw me. I thought she was a GP…?
Mate, she’s a recipient of a bent spoon award. She a shill for big homeopathy. She really is a nutter.
sibeen said:
Rule 303 said:
captain_spalding said:Am i confused? Wasn’t Kerryn Phelps in Wentworth?
Sorry mate, it was the ‘tapwater for seriously ill patients’ that threw me. I thought she was a GP…?
Mate, she’s a recipient of a bent spoon award. She a shill for big homeopathy. She really is a nutter.
Well… Slap my arse and call me Sandra. I had NFI…
When you say she did a lot of things, a lot of that was everyday boiler plate legislation that would go unmentioned but she had to number it as something exceptional to contrast her work habits with the chaotic Rudd. There’s probably a number somewhere in Parliament.
sibeen said:
Rule 303 said:
captain_spalding said:Am i confused? Wasn’t Kerryn Phelps in Wentworth?
Sorry mate, it was the ‘tapwater for seriously ill patients’ that threw me. I thought she was a GP…?
Mate, she’s a recipient of a bent spoon award. She a shill for big homeopathy. She really is a nutter.
With a PhD too.
AwesomeO said:
When you say she did a lot of things, a lot of that was everyday boiler plate legislation that would go unmentioned but she had to number it as something exceptional to contrast her work habits with the chaotic Rudd. There’s probably a number somewhere in Parliament.
See my next link. It wasn’t just run of the mill stuff.
PermeateFree said:
sibeen said:
Rule 303 said:Sorry mate, it was the ‘tapwater for seriously ill patients’ that threw me. I thought she was a GP…?
Mate, she’s a recipient of a bent spoon award. She a shill for big homeopathy. She really is a nutter.
With a PhD too.
Honorary Doctor of Letters, according to Wiki.
Dear oh dear, including a surplus as an achievement?
AwesomeO said:
Dear oh dear, including a surplus as an achievement?
That is not a list she wrote for herself.
buffy said:
AwesomeO said:
Dear oh dear, including a surplus as an achievement?
That is not a list she wrote for herself.
I just pasted what you said where her achievements and it is titled Gillard government’s achievements and failures.
It doesn’t back your position.
Rule 303 said:
PermeateFree said:
sibeen said:Mate, she’s a recipient of a bent spoon award. She a shill for big homeopathy. She really is a nutter.
With a PhD too.
Honorary Doctor of Letters, according to Wiki.
Still not bad, but I think there are plenty of nutters with prestigious qualifications.
PermeateFree said:
Rule 303 said:
PermeateFree said:With a PhD too.
Honorary Doctor of Letters, according to Wiki.
Still not bad, but I think there are plenty of nutters with prestigious qualifications.
An Honorary Doctorate is an award, not a qualification. It confers admiration, not academic merit.
AwesomeO said:
buffy said:
AwesomeO said:
Dear oh dear, including a surplus as an achievement?
That is not a list she wrote for herself.
I just pasted what you said where her achievements and it is titled Gillard government’s achievements and failures.
It doesn’t back your position.
sorry, I don’t understand what you have written there.
Anyway, this is, I know, a feminist viewpoint, but a well written piece.
https://nofibs.com.au/give-pm-julia-gillard-credit-where-credit-is-due/
Rule 303 said:
PermeateFree said:
Rule 303 said:Honorary Doctor of Letters, according to Wiki.
Still not bad, but I think there are plenty of nutters with prestigious qualifications.
An Honorary Doctorate is an award, not a qualification. It confers admiration, not academic merit.
Prestigious?
PermeateFree said:
Rule 303 said:
PermeateFree said:Still not bad, but I think there are plenty of nutters with prestigious qualifications.
An Honorary Doctorate is an award, not a qualification. It confers admiration, not academic merit.
Prestigious?
An honorary degree is an academic degree for which a university has waived the usual requirements, such as matriculation, residence, a dissertation, and the passing of comprehensive examinations. It is also known by the Latin phrases honoris causa or ad honorem. Wikipedia
PermeateFree said:
Rule 303 said:
PermeateFree said:Still not bad, but I think there are plenty of nutters with prestigious qualifications.
An Honorary Doctorate is an award, not a qualification. It confers admiration, not academic merit.
Prestigious?
Yeah, hmmm… Across Australia I would guess there’s a couple of hundred a year.
Rule 303 said:
PermeateFree said:
Rule 303 said:An Honorary Doctorate is an award, not a qualification. It confers admiration, not academic merit.
Prestigious?
Yeah, hmmm… Across Australia I would guess there’s a couple of hundred a year.
pfft, degrees are almost worthless from australian unis these days let alone honorary claptrap.
poikilotherm said:
Rule 303 said:
PermeateFree said:Prestigious?
Yeah, hmmm… Across Australia I would guess there’s a couple of hundred a year.
pfft, degrees are almost worthless from australian unis these days let alone honorary claptrap.
There was this WAlien chick who used the handle ‘Arts Degrees Will Something Something.’
poikilotherm said:
Rule 303 said:
PermeateFree said:Prestigious?
Yeah, hmmm… Across Australia I would guess there’s a couple of hundred a year.
pfft, degrees are almost worthless from australian unis these days let alone honorary claptrap.
Good to see the cultural cringe is alive and well.
The Rev Dodgson said:
poikilotherm said:
Rule 303 said:Yeah, hmmm… Across Australia I would guess there’s a couple of hundred a year.
pfft, degrees are almost worthless from australian unis these days let alone honorary claptrap.
Good to see the cultural cringe is alive and well.
It’s our best export.
I was mumbling before the election about how I was afraid of the right giving preferences to the right.
But I did think there would be a turn out of voters that had signed up to vote for gay causes in the plebiscite. And that might be fresh. And I thought the very young voters might vote for the planet.
Apparently many more voters were concerned about getting the money from investments that they do not own. More than what wanted wage rises and more hospital funding.
It’s all sad and weird.
Before the Election Thread dies.
Rofl some great work by Ashleigh Elizabeth here
dv said:
Rofl some great work by Ashleigh Elizabeth here
You have to laugh, but it’s not easy.
Rule 303 said:
poikilotherm said:
Rule 303 said:Yeah, hmmm… Across Australia I would guess there’s a couple of hundred a year.
pfft, degrees are almost worthless from australian unis these days let alone honorary claptrap.
There was this WAlien chick who used the handle ‘Arts Degrees Will Something Something.’
pfft never heard of her
dv said:
Rofl some great work by Ashleigh Elizabeth here
Perfect.
buffy said:
AwesomeO said:
buffy said:That is not a list she wrote for herself.
I just pasted what you said where her achievements and it is titled Gillard government’s achievements and failures.
It doesn’t back your position.
sorry, I don’t understand what you have written there.
Anyway, this is, I know, a feminist viewpoint, but a well written piece.
https://nofibs.com.au/give-pm-julia-gillard-credit-where-credit-is-due/
Careful. His brain might melt.
NewExaminer
8 hrs ·
MAV TO START WAVING TOMORROW FOR 2022 FEDERAL ELECTION
Despite conducting his own extensive internal polling at a range of Burnie nightclubs and local football training sessions which indicated he would gain 50 000 Senate votes and be on a plane to Canberra tomorrow, Steve Mav has fallen an agonisingly close 47 500 short of the required number.
After wasting the past ten months standing by the side of the road creating a traffic hazard while supporting policies such as reintroducing public hangings, duck shooting lessons in primary schools and banning cyclists from roads, it is unclear which public office he will unsuccessfully now run for, or if he will be forced to get an actual job like most normal people.
Unsurprisingly, Mav supporters reacted angrily to the tragic loss, with many venting their anger on his Facebook page.
Zaedyn Doering pulled no punches, announcing that; Tasmanian’s should lern to vote in crayon becose its’ harder for extreme green vote counters to rub out then pencil.’
sarahs mum said:
I was mumbling before the election about how I was afraid of the right giving preferences to the right.But I did think there would be a turn out of voters that had signed up to vote for gay causes in the plebiscite. And that might be fresh. And I thought the very young voters might vote for the planet.
Apparently many more voters were concerned about getting the money from investments that they do not own. More than what wanted wage rises and more hospital funding.
It’s all sad and weird.
yes the thought crossed
but we suppose wanting marriage equality does not preclude greed
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
I was mumbling before the election about how I was afraid of the right giving preferences to the right.But I did think there would be a turn out of voters that had signed up to vote for gay causes in the plebiscite. And that might be fresh. And I thought the very young voters might vote for the planet.
Apparently many more voters were concerned about getting the money from investments that they do not own. More than what wanted wage rises and more hospital funding.
It’s all sad and weird.
yes the thought crossed
but we suppose wanting marriage equality does not preclude greed
I don’t understand why sarah’s mum thinks a vote for labor is a vote against greed. Wouldn’t that be completely back to front?
mollwollfumble said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
I was mumbling before the election about how I was afraid of the right giving preferences to the right.But I did think there would be a turn out of voters that had signed up to vote for gay causes in the plebiscite. And that might be fresh. And I thought the very young voters might vote for the planet.
Apparently many more voters were concerned about getting the money from investments that they do not own. More than what wanted wage rises and more hospital funding.
It’s all sad and weird.
yes the thought crossed
but we suppose wanting marriage equality does not preclude greed
I don’t understand why sarah’s mum thinks a vote for labor is a vote against greed. Wouldn’t that be completely back to front?
a fair and true point; there would be similar self interest at play toward either big party
“Got trounced in every other state too”
Before the election they held 69 seats. At present it looks as though they are going to end up with 68 seats (possibly 69 if they keep improving in the Chisholm count). They didn’t get trounced in every state, or indeed overall. It’s a status quo result: which is not good because I wanted them to win.
Currently it appears the ALP enjoyed a 2% swing towards them in Victoria, a 1% swing in SA, a 1% swing in ACT. It would appear to be a 0% shift in WA. They went backwards 1% in NT and NSW.
In Tasmania they lost about 3%, in Qld about 4%.
It is factually inaccurate to imply they suffered everywhere. They only places they copped significant swings against them were in Tasmania and Qld.
Yes, status quo, but as was pointed out on Insiders yesterday…with only a mandate for the tax changes to flatten the tax scale. Nothing else, because nothing else was revealed.
It’s going to be interesting.
SCIENCE said:
mollwollfumble said:
SCIENCE said:yes the thought crossed
but we suppose wanting marriage equality does not preclude greed
I don’t understand why sarah’s mum thinks a vote for labor is a vote against greed. Wouldn’t that be completely back to front?
a fair and true point; there would be similar self interest at play toward either big party
If the level of self interest is similar toward either big party, then the suggestion that saying a vote for labor is a vote for greed is “completely back to front” is not a “true and fair point”, it is a grossly exaggerated and unbalanced point.
I agree that the level of self interest is much the same, although directed at different groups, and more successfully manipulated by one party to attract people who are not members of the group who will benefit.
People voting in their own self interest is of course inevitable, and in a democratic system is just how it should be, providing everyone takes due note of:
1) Assessing and minimising hidden and future costs.
2) Self interest includes providing support for those who need it, because:
a) you may be in that position one day,
b) too much inequality leads to violent outcomes, which are bad for everyone, and
c) most importantly support for family, friends, local and wider community is a hugely important part of “self interest”.
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
I was mumbling before the election about how I was afraid of the right giving preferences to the right.But I did think there would be a turn out of voters that had signed up to vote for gay causes in the plebiscite. And that might be fresh. And I thought the very young voters might vote for the planet.
Apparently many more voters were concerned about getting the money from investments that they do not own. More than what wanted wage rises and more hospital funding.
It’s all sad and weird.
yes the thought crossed
but we suppose wanting marriage equality does not preclude greed
My comments are:
It’s not a huge number of voters making the difference. As always, it is a tiny number of voters making the difference.
The franking credits thing is not “getting the money from investments that they do not own.” Removing franking credits means people on an income which would not normally be taxed are taxed at 30%, whereas those on a higher income will be taxed at their marginal rate. It is increasing tax on the lowest income group. Either franking credits should be paid to everybody under the Australian tax system, or should be withdrawn from everybody. Removing the credits from those with the lowest taxable income only is a cynical move, with no justification.
That nice Kerryn Phelps seems she’s about to concede.
What a shame.
Just checking NSW Senate:
Lib up 2%
Lab down 0.7%
Green up 2%
So even if we look at Lab+Green, still a swing to Lib, which is a bit surprising.
sibeen said:
That nice Kerryn Phelps seems she’s about to concede.What a shame.
Yes we all know how much you respect and admire her.
Listened to her mate Zali Steggal this morning. I was quite impressed.
Please don’t disillusion me:)
The Rev Dodgson said:
sibeen said:
That nice Kerryn Phelps seems she’s about to concede.What a shame.
Yes we all know how much you respect and admire her.
Listened to her mate Zali Steggal this morning. I was quite impressed.
Please don’t disillusion me:)
I would have voted for Zali myself :)
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just checking NSW Senate:Lib up 2%
Lab down 0.7%
Green up 2%So even if we look at Lab+Green, still a swing to Lib, which is a bit surprising.
ALP, it’s ALP…for fucks sake.
kii said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just checking NSW Senate:Lib up 2%
Lab down 0.7%
Green up 2%So even if we look at Lab+Green, still a swing to Lib, which is a bit surprising.
ALP, it’s ALP…for fucks sake.
Good to see you focussing on the important things in life.
The Rev Dodgson said:
kii said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just checking NSW Senate:Lib up 2%
Lab down 0.7%
Green up 2%So even if we look at Lab+Green, still a swing to Lib, which is a bit surprising.
ALP, it’s ALP…for fucks sake.
Good to see you focussing on the important things in life.
Correct names and labels are important, especially when new parties are popping up and adding to the chaos.
Lookin’ like Libs with a majority according to the commie press.
“The ABC election computer is predicting the Coalition has secured majority government with at least 77 seats, as the Liberals appear set to secure Bass, Chisholm, Boothby and Wentworth.”
That’s what Antony Green was saying when I came home this morning. He was on TV talking about the polls, the result, and the likelihood of a majority government. Iwasn’t really listening, I just wanted breakfast.
kii said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
kii said:ALP, it’s ALP…for fucks sake.
Good to see you focussing on the important things in life.
Correct names and labels are important, especially when new parties are popping up and adding to the chaos.
OK.
Please whenever you see Lab, Labs, The Labs, Labor, The Labor Party of Australia, or similar, be assured that it refers to the political party also known by the abbreviation ALP, unless stated otherwise.
Divine Angel said:
That’s what Antony Green was saying when I came home this morning. He was on TV talking about the polls, the result, and the likelihood of a majority government. Iwasn’t really listening, I just wanted breakfast.
What was?
poikilotherm said:
Lookin’ like Libs with a majority according to the commie press.“The ABC election computer is predicting the Coalition has secured majority government with at least 77 seats, as the Liberals appear set to secure Bass, Chisholm, Boothby and Wentworth.”
(Shrugs) there is a 160 vote gap in Chisholm, so no one should be giving that away yet
The Rev Dodgson said:
kii said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Good to see you focussing on the important things in life.
Correct names and labels are important, especially when new parties are popping up and adding to the chaos.
OK.
Please whenever you see Lab, Labs, The Labs, Labor, The Labor Party of Australia, or similar, be assured that it refers to the political party also known by the abbreviation ALP, unless stated otherwise.
Jesus fucking christ.
Don’t advise me about what I should do.
This just went past on my Facebook.

Robin Ó Riagháin
Follow · Yesterday ·
Australian Election: once again imho Australian “democracy” is somewhat broken. From the votes counted so far 58.4% of the voters did NOT vote directly for the (conservative/right-wing) Coalition (of the Liberal/National parties) in the so-called “House of Representatives”. Just 28% of those who voted did so directly for the (so-called) Liberal (ie. conservative big business) party who retain government and have the Prime Minister from that. Another 4.6% voted for the more conservative Nationals (the rural country party) and 8.7% for the merged Liberal Nationals in some electorates. Forming 41% for the Coalition overall.
In contrast 33.3% voted for Labor and 10.3% for The Greens; a 43.6% vote for the “left”. (Further below I explain how that 10% vote for The Greens is shrunk to <1% of seats and how the ~13% vote for the Lib+Nationals is expanded to become 23% of the politicians in the House of Reps.)
Another 14.8% of votes went to independents and minor parties. Although some of those are right-wing (Clive Palmer’s UAP with 3.4% & One Nation with 3%) and they funneled their vote preferences to the Coalition.
Interestingly in election after election more people vote for the Labor party than for the (so-called) Liberal party yet the latter often form the government and hold the Prime Ministership with only around 1 in 3 or 4 of the votes directly for them.
If the Liberal party wasn’t in a Coalition with the National party they’d likely never form the government. And the Nationals would not have any politicians in government positions.
If we had a system of Proportional Representation* then there’d be ~10% of the House of Reps as The Greens.
But as we tolerate a system that’s rigged (so that votes get funneled to the big business parties) there is potentially just 1 representative from The Greens in the House of Reps; just 1 of 141 seats = less than 1% of the seats. **
In other words 10% of voters become <1% of political votes in the House of Reps.
Meanwhile the Nationals received just 4.6% of the vote and they have won 10 seats in the House of Reps = 7% of seats. **
In other words with less than half the vote of the Greens the conservative Nationals have 10 times the politicians in the House of Reps.
And likewise, with just 8.7% of the vote for the Liberal National Party they’ve won 23 seats in the House of Reps.**
That’s another 23 more voting politicians in parliament than the Greens get even though more Australians voted for The Greens!!
So adding it together:
A 13% vote for National party (4.6) + Liberal National Party (8.7) = 33 seats in House of Reps = 23% of seats …
While 10% vote for The Greens = 1 seat; <1% of seats in House of Reps.
And we tolerate this scenario; election after election.
kii said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
kii said:Correct names and labels are important, especially when new parties are popping up and adding to the chaos.
OK.
Please whenever you see Lab, Labs, The Labs, Labor, The Labor Party of Australia, or similar, be assured that it refers to the political party also known by the abbreviation ALP, unless stated otherwise.
Jesus fucking christ.
Don’t advise me about what I should do.
I didn’t. I told how you may interpret what I write, if you wish to know the meaning of the words.
What you do is entirely up to you.
I do note however that you do seem to be advising me what I should do.
The level of anger about something so trivial seems pretty fucking ridiculous as well.
Sweet result on the weekend hey, hopefully all this save the environment nonsense will go away, my stocks are up in price as well

dv said:
poikilotherm said:
Lookin’ like Libs with a majority according to the commie press.“The ABC election computer is predicting the Coalition has secured majority government with at least 77 seats, as the Liberals appear set to secure Bass, Chisholm, Boothby and Wentworth.”
(Shrugs) there is a 160 vote gap in Chisholm, so no one should be giving that away yet
That gap is now 138
> Correct names and labels are important, especially when new parties are popping up and adding to the chaos.
I wish parties would choose names and labels that correctly identify their policies.
For instance (warning: devil’s advocate mode) the correct party name shouldn’t be “Australian Greens” it should be “Bushwalkers lobby group opposed to renewable energy”.
sarahs mum said:
This just went past on my Facebook.
For my house of reps I voted United Australia. Not that I like it, I think it’s awful. It’s just that it’s better than anything else on the list other than independents, and my seat didn’t field an independent.
Not the same as previous years.
mollwollfumble said:
sarahs mum said:
This just went past on my Facebook.
For my house of reps I voted United Australia. Not that I like it, I think it’s awful. It’s just that it’s better than anything else on the list other than independents, and my seat didn’t field an independent.
Not the same as previous years.
Really?
And in what ways do you see the so-called United Australia party as being superior to all of the other parties?
It seems to me they do a pretty good job of being worse than the others, which takes some doing admittedly.
The Rev Dodgson said:
mollwollfumble said:
sarahs mum said:
This just went past on my Facebook.
For my house of reps I voted United Australia. Not that I like it, I think it’s awful. It’s just that it’s better than anything else on the list other than independents, and my seat didn’t field an independent.
Not the same as previous years.
Really?
And in what ways do you see the so-called United Australia party as being superior to all of the other parties?
It seems to me they do a pretty good job of being worse than the others, which takes some doing admittedly.
He’s a bit of a fat retard Clive Palmer
sarahs mum said:
This just went past on my Facebook.
Robin Ó Riagháin
Follow · Yesterday ·Australian Election: once again imho Australian “democracy” is somewhat broken. From the votes counted so far 58.4% of the voters did NOT vote directly for the (conservative/right-wing) Coalition (of the Liberal/National parties) in the so-called “House of Representatives”. Just 28% of those who voted did so directly for the (so-called) Liberal (ie. conservative big business) party who retain government and have the Prime Minister from that. Another 4.6% voted for the more conservative Nationals (the rural country party) and 8.7% for the merged Liberal Nationals in some electorates. Forming 41% for the Coalition overall.
In contrast 33.3% voted for Labor and 10.3% for The Greens; a 43.6% vote for the “left”. (Further below I explain how that 10% vote for The Greens is shrunk to <1% of seats and how the ~13% vote for the Lib+Nationals is expanded to become 23% of the politicians in the House of Reps.)
Another 14.8% of votes went to independents and minor parties. Although some of those are right-wing (Clive Palmer’s UAP with 3.4% & One Nation with 3%) and they funneled their vote preferences to the Coalition.
Interestingly in election after election more people vote for the Labor party than for the (so-called) Liberal party yet the latter often form the government and hold the Prime Ministership with only around 1 in 3 or 4 of the votes directly for them.
If the Liberal party wasn’t in a Coalition with the National party they’d likely never form the government. And the Nationals would not have any politicians in government positions.If we had a system of Proportional Representation* then there’d be ~10% of the House of Reps as The Greens.
But as we tolerate a system that’s rigged (so that votes get funneled to the big business parties) there is potentially just 1 representative from The Greens in the House of Reps; just 1 of 141 seats = less than 1% of the seats. **
In other words 10% of voters become <1% of political votes in the House of Reps.
Meanwhile the Nationals received just 4.6% of the vote and they have won 10 seats in the House of Reps = 7% of seats. **
In other words with less than half the vote of the Greens the conservative Nationals have 10 times the politicians in the House of Reps.
And likewise, with just 8.7% of the vote for the Liberal National Party they’ve won 23 seats in the House of Reps.**
That’s another 23 more voting politicians in parliament than the Greens get even though more Australians voted for The Greens!!
So adding it together:
A 13% vote for National party (4.6) + Liberal National Party (8.7) = 33 seats in House of Reps = 23% of seats …
While 10% vote for The Greens = 1 seat; <1% of seats in House of Reps.
And we tolerate this scenario; election after election.
That is the problem when the Greens are spread around most electorates, but not concentrated in sufficient numbers in specific electorates to get over the line. The Greens and the ALP should form a coalition to take on the LNP, but other than change the electoral system, the fault lies with these parties reluctance to do anything about it.
PermeateFree said:
sarahs mum said:
This just went past on my Facebook.
Robin Ó Riagháin
Follow · Yesterday ·Australian Election: once again imho Australian “democracy” is somewhat broken. From the votes counted so far 58.4% of the voters did NOT vote directly for the (conservative/right-wing) Coalition (of the Liberal/National parties) in the so-called “House of Representatives”. Just 28% of those who voted did so directly for the (so-called) Liberal (ie. conservative big business) party who retain government and have the Prime Minister from that. Another 4.6% voted for the more conservative Nationals (the rural country party) and 8.7% for the merged Liberal Nationals in some electorates. Forming 41% for the Coalition overall.
In contrast 33.3% voted for Labor and 10.3% for The Greens; a 43.6% vote for the “left”. (Further below I explain how that 10% vote for The Greens is shrunk to <1% of seats and how the ~13% vote for the Lib+Nationals is expanded to become 23% of the politicians in the House of Reps.)
Another 14.8% of votes went to independents and minor parties. Although some of those are right-wing (Clive Palmer’s UAP with 3.4% & One Nation with 3%) and they funneled their vote preferences to the Coalition.
Interestingly in election after election more people vote for the Labor party than for the (so-called) Liberal party yet the latter often form the government and hold the Prime Ministership with only around 1 in 3 or 4 of the votes directly for them.
If the Liberal party wasn’t in a Coalition with the National party they’d likely never form the government. And the Nationals would not have any politicians in government positions.If we had a system of Proportional Representation* then there’d be ~10% of the House of Reps as The Greens.
But as we tolerate a system that’s rigged (so that votes get funneled to the big business parties) there is potentially just 1 representative from The Greens in the House of Reps; just 1 of 141 seats = less than 1% of the seats. **
In other words 10% of voters become <1% of political votes in the House of Reps.
Meanwhile the Nationals received just 4.6% of the vote and they have won 10 seats in the House of Reps = 7% of seats. **
In other words with less than half the vote of the Greens the conservative Nationals have 10 times the politicians in the House of Reps.
And likewise, with just 8.7% of the vote for the Liberal National Party they’ve won 23 seats in the House of Reps.**
That’s another 23 more voting politicians in parliament than the Greens get even though more Australians voted for The Greens!!
So adding it together:
A 13% vote for National party (4.6) + Liberal National Party (8.7) = 33 seats in House of Reps = 23% of seats …
While 10% vote for The Greens = 1 seat; <1% of seats in House of Reps.
And we tolerate this scenario; election after election.
That is the problem when the Greens are spread around most electorates, but not concentrated in sufficient numbers in specific electorates to get over the line. The Greens and the ALP should form a coalition to take on the LNP, but other than change the electoral system, the fault lies with these parties reluctance to do anything about it.
The greens and Lab do have a defacto coalition. Green preferences generally go to Lab.
sibeen said:
PermeateFree said:
sarahs mum said:
This just went past on my Facebook.
Robin Ó Riagháin
Follow · Yesterday ·Australian Election: once again imho Australian “democracy” is somewhat broken. From the votes counted so far 58.4% of the voters did NOT vote directly for the (conservative/right-wing) Coalition (of the Liberal/National parties) in the so-called “House of Representatives”. Just 28% of those who voted did so directly for the (so-called) Liberal (ie. conservative big business) party who retain government and have the Prime Minister from that. Another 4.6% voted for the more conservative Nationals (the rural country party) and 8.7% for the merged Liberal Nationals in some electorates. Forming 41% for the Coalition overall.
In contrast 33.3% voted for Labor and 10.3% for The Greens; a 43.6% vote for the “left”. (Further below I explain how that 10% vote for The Greens is shrunk to <1% of seats and how the ~13% vote for the Lib+Nationals is expanded to become 23% of the politicians in the House of Reps.)
Another 14.8% of votes went to independents and minor parties. Although some of those are right-wing (Clive Palmer’s UAP with 3.4% & One Nation with 3%) and they funneled their vote preferences to the Coalition.
Interestingly in election after election more people vote for the Labor party than for the (so-called) Liberal party yet the latter often form the government and hold the Prime Ministership with only around 1 in 3 or 4 of the votes directly for them.
If the Liberal party wasn’t in a Coalition with the National party they’d likely never form the government. And the Nationals would not have any politicians in government positions.If we had a system of Proportional Representation* then there’d be ~10% of the House of Reps as The Greens.
But as we tolerate a system that’s rigged (so that votes get funneled to the big business parties) there is potentially just 1 representative from The Greens in the House of Reps; just 1 of 141 seats = less than 1% of the seats. **
In other words 10% of voters become <1% of political votes in the House of Reps.
Meanwhile the Nationals received just 4.6% of the vote and they have won 10 seats in the House of Reps = 7% of seats. **
In other words with less than half the vote of the Greens the conservative Nationals have 10 times the politicians in the House of Reps.
And likewise, with just 8.7% of the vote for the Liberal National Party they’ve won 23 seats in the House of Reps.**
That’s another 23 more voting politicians in parliament than the Greens get even though more Australians voted for The Greens!!
So adding it together:
A 13% vote for National party (4.6) + Liberal National Party (8.7) = 33 seats in House of Reps = 23% of seats …
While 10% vote for The Greens = 1 seat; <1% of seats in House of Reps.
And we tolerate this scenario; election after election.
That is the problem when the Greens are spread around most electorates, but not concentrated in sufficient numbers in specific electorates to get over the line. The Greens and the ALP should form a coalition to take on the LNP, but other than change the electoral system, the fault lies with these parties reluctance to do anything about it.
The greens and Lab do have a defacto coalition. Green preferences generally go to Lab.
Yes but the primary vote is not altered which is what counts to win the election.
sibeen said:
PermeateFree said:
sarahs mum said:
This just went past on my Facebook.
Robin Ó Riagháin
Follow · Yesterday ·Australian Election: once again imho Australian “democracy” is somewhat broken. From the votes counted so far 58.4% of the voters did NOT vote directly for the (conservative/right-wing) Coalition (of the Liberal/National parties) in the so-called “House of Representatives”. Just 28% of those who voted did so directly for the (so-called) Liberal (ie. conservative big business) party who retain government and have the Prime Minister from that. Another 4.6% voted for the more conservative Nationals (the rural country party) and 8.7% for the merged Liberal Nationals in some electorates. Forming 41% for the Coalition overall.
In contrast 33.3% voted for Labor and 10.3% for The Greens; a 43.6% vote for the “left”. (Further below I explain how that 10% vote for The Greens is shrunk to <1% of seats and how the ~13% vote for the Lib+Nationals is expanded to become 23% of the politicians in the House of Reps.)
Another 14.8% of votes went to independents and minor parties. Although some of those are right-wing (Clive Palmer’s UAP with 3.4% & One Nation with 3%) and they funneled their vote preferences to the Coalition.
Interestingly in election after election more people vote for the Labor party than for the (so-called) Liberal party yet the latter often form the government and hold the Prime Ministership with only around 1 in 3 or 4 of the votes directly for them.
If the Liberal party wasn’t in a Coalition with the National party they’d likely never form the government. And the Nationals would not have any politicians in government positions.If we had a system of Proportional Representation* then there’d be ~10% of the House of Reps as The Greens.
But as we tolerate a system that’s rigged (so that votes get funneled to the big business parties) there is potentially just 1 representative from The Greens in the House of Reps; just 1 of 141 seats = less than 1% of the seats. **
In other words 10% of voters become <1% of political votes in the House of Reps.
Meanwhile the Nationals received just 4.6% of the vote and they have won 10 seats in the House of Reps = 7% of seats. **
In other words with less than half the vote of the Greens the conservative Nationals have 10 times the politicians in the House of Reps.
And likewise, with just 8.7% of the vote for the Liberal National Party they’ve won 23 seats in the House of Reps.**
That’s another 23 more voting politicians in parliament than the Greens get even though more Australians voted for The Greens!!
So adding it together:
A 13% vote for National party (4.6) + Liberal National Party (8.7) = 33 seats in House of Reps = 23% of seats …
While 10% vote for The Greens = 1 seat; <1% of seats in House of Reps.
And we tolerate this scenario; election after election.
That is the problem when the Greens are spread around most electorates, but not concentrated in sufficient numbers in specific electorates to get over the line. The Greens and the ALP should form a coalition to take on the LNP, but other than change the electoral system, the fault lies with these parties reluctance to do anything about it.
The greens and Lab do have a defacto coalition. Green preferences generally go to Lab.
My son volunteered for the Greens this election and mentioned how they don’t accept- bribes- donations from companies/business/unions so they would have limited funds to spend on promoting themselves let alone slagging off other parties
Cymek said:
sibeen said:
PermeateFree said:That is the problem when the Greens are spread around most electorates, but not concentrated in sufficient numbers in specific electorates to get over the line. The Greens and the ALP should form a coalition to take on the LNP, but other than change the electoral system, the fault lies with these parties reluctance to do anything about it.
The greens and Lab do have a defacto coalition. Green preferences generally go to Lab.
My son volunteered for the Greens this election and mentioned how they don’t accept- bribes- donations from companies/business/unions so they would have limited funds to spend on promoting themselves let alone slagging off other parties
The Greens are not big slaggers either.
But It seems slagging still wins elections.
sarahs mum said:
Cymek said:
sibeen said:The greens and Lab do have a defacto coalition. Green preferences generally go to Lab.
My son volunteered for the Greens this election and mentioned how they don’t accept
bribesdonations from companies/business/unions so they would have limited funds to spend on promoting themselves let alone slagging off other parties
The Greens are not big slaggers either.
But It seems slagging still wins elections.
It is a rather underhanded way to win an election which is SNAFU I suppose
Tanya Plibersek has stated she’s not going to contest the Lab leadership.
sibeen said:
Tanya Plibersek has stated she’s not going to contest the Lab leadership.
Already cut a deal.
sarahs mum said:
Cymek said:
sibeen said:The greens and Lab do have a defacto coalition. Green preferences generally go to Lab.
My son volunteered for the Greens this election and mentioned how they don’t accept- bribes- donations from companies/business/unions so they would have limited funds to spend on promoting themselves let alone slagging off other parties
The Greens are not big slaggers either.
But It seems slagging still wins elections.
The Greens just don’t have the cash for wide spread slagging.
It seems to me that a transferable vote for the lower house, with seats decided by 2pp vote by constituency, and proportional representation by state in the upper house, is a pretty good compromise.
In fact I can’t think of a better compromise.
Everything said about the adverse effects of the system on the Greens could equally well be said about One Nation.
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
Cymek said:
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
I think they do but not enough, most would probably think they can live with hotter summers by turning up the air-conditioner. Things are not taken seriously unless people are personally disadvantaged.
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
I think they do but not enough, most would probably think they can live with hotter summers by turning up the air-conditioner. Things are not taken seriously unless people are personally disadvantaged.
Pretty much I’d say.
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
I think they do but not enough, most would probably think they can live with hotter summers by turning up the air-conditioner. Things are not taken seriously unless people are personally disadvantaged.
Yes but by then it will be way to late to save their precious arses.
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
I think they do but not enough, most would probably think they can live with hotter summers by turning up the air-conditioner. Things are not taken seriously unless people are personally disadvantaged.
I spent a good bit of the summer not being able to breathe because the atmosphere was running 4 Beijings of crap in it from burning terrain that doesn’t ever burn.
Cymek said:
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
I imagine that there are quite large numbers who think that climate change needs to be dealt with by someone else (principally by China and India),and that Morrison is just the bloke to make sure that this has minimum impact on our current standard of living.
roughbarked said:
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
I think they do but not enough, most would probably think they can live with hotter summers by turning up the air-conditioner. Things are not taken seriously unless people are personally disadvantaged.
Yes but by then it will be way to late to save their precious arses.
Even simple things don’t seem to get suggested or proposed
What about all food produce packaging is switched over to recyclable material kept as colourless as possible so various dyes aren’t needed.
Would people even care if a cereal box was made from recycled cardboard with a sticker on it showing the name and what is contains instead of a colourful box you might put into the recycling bin. Even that is doing something.
sarahs mum said:
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
I think they do but not enough, most would probably think they can live with hotter summers by turning up the air-conditioner. Things are not taken seriously unless people are personally disadvantaged.
I spent a good bit of the summer not being able to breathe because the atmosphere was running 4 Beijings of crap in it from burning terrain that doesn’t ever burn.
Also there is the other thing. People don’t actually believe that a governnment, our government can affect climate change because the whole world has to be changing, not just us.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Cymek said:
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
I imagine that there are quite large numbers who think that climate change needs to be dealt with by someone else (principally by China and India),and that Morrison is just the bloke to make sure that this has minimum impact on our current standard of living.
I bet if you took our population size and our impact we’d be right up the top of polluters and just because it’s smaller than other nations it doesn’t mean we should ignore it.
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
PermeateFree said:I think they do but not enough, most would probably think they can live with hotter summers by turning up the air-conditioner. Things are not taken seriously unless people are personally disadvantaged.
Yes but by then it will be way to late to save their precious arses.
Even simple things don’t seem to get suggested or proposed
What about all food produce packaging is switched over to recyclable material kept as colourless as possible so various dyes aren’t needed.
Would people even care if a cereal box was made from recycled cardboard with a sticker on it showing the name and what is contains instead of a colourful box you might put into the recycling bin. Even that is doing something.
Yes; the manufacturers, their marketers, those that work for them and shareholders etc would care very much about doing a plain packaging thing for cereal ala cigarettes.
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:
PermeateFree said:I think they do but not enough, most would probably think they can live with hotter summers by turning up the air-conditioner. Things are not taken seriously unless people are personally disadvantaged.
I spent a good bit of the summer not being able to breathe because the atmosphere was running 4 Beijings of crap in it from burning terrain that doesn’t ever burn.
Also there is the other thing. People don’t actually believe that a governnment, our government can affect climate change because the whole world has to be changing, not just us.
There are a number of small to middling countries who would be thinking like that. However global warming as a global problem, everyone needs to be helping.
poikilotherm said:
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:Yes but by then it will be way to late to save their precious arses.
Even simple things don’t seem to get suggested or proposed
What about all food produce packaging is switched over to recyclable material kept as colourless as possible so various dyes aren’t needed.
Would people even care if a cereal box was made from recycled cardboard with a sticker on it showing the name and what is contains instead of a colourful box you might put into the recycling bin. Even that is doing something.
Yes; the manufacturers, their marketers, those that work for them and shareholders etc would care very much about doing a plain packaging thing for cereal ala cigarettes.
All food products in fact it could be for anything in a box or packet, make it law and everyone has to do it and is in the same boat
poikilotherm said:
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:Yes but by then it will be way to late to save their precious arses.
Even simple things don’t seem to get suggested or proposed
What about all food produce packaging is switched over to recyclable material kept as colourless as possible so various dyes aren’t needed.
Would people even care if a cereal box was made from recycled cardboard with a sticker on it showing the name and what is contains instead of a colourful box you might put into the recycling bin. Even that is doing something.
Yes; the manufacturers, their marketers, those that work for them and shareholders etc would care very much about doing a plain packaging thing for cereal ala cigarettes.
Well, beside the marketers, the advertisers, the manufacturers, the people who work for them and the shareholders no-one else would really care, would they?
Cymek said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Cymek said:
I suppose if anything can be taken away from this election is most of the Australian population has made it clear they don’t really care about the environment or climate change and it’s all about business as usual, not unexpected
I imagine that there are quite large numbers who think that climate change needs to be dealt with by someone else (principally by China and India),and that Morrison is just the bloke to make sure that this has minimum impact on our current standard of living.
I bet if you took our population size and our impact we’d be right up the top of polluters and just because it’s smaller than other nations it doesn’t mean we should ignore it.
I didn’t say I agreed with them. In fact I don’t.
It is though quite a hard argument to sell that we should be acting at least in proportion to our emissions/head, although all political parties seem to have no trouble at all convincing people that they must do their bit in the case of war.Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:
Cymek said:Even simple things don’t seem to get suggested or proposed
What about all food produce packaging is switched over to recyclable material kept as colourless as possible so various dyes aren’t needed.
Would people even care if a cereal box was made from recycled cardboard with a sticker on it showing the name and what is contains instead of a colourful box you might put into the recycling bin. Even that is doing something.
Yes; the manufacturers, their marketers, those that work for them and shareholders etc would care very much about doing a plain packaging thing for cereal ala cigarettes.
All food products in fact it could be for anything in a box or packet, make it law and everyone has to do it and is in the same boat
Hey,same with cars, we could force manufacturers to make the same four cylinder model, have it painted black and sold at the same price.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Cymek said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I imagine that there are quite large numbers who think that climate change needs to be dealt with by someone else (principally by China and India),and that Morrison is just the bloke to make sure that this has minimum impact on our current standard of living.
I bet if you took our population size and our impact we’d be right up the top of polluters and just because it’s smaller than other nations it doesn’t mean we should ignore it.
I didn’t say I agreed with them. In fact I don’t.
It is though quite a hard argument to sell that we should be acting at least in proportion to our emissions/head, although all political parties seem to have no trouble at all convincing people that they must do their bit in the case of war.
Leading by example is the only way. Clean green packaging etc.,will sell better so business will have to follow
The Rev Dodgson said:
Cymek said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I imagine that there are quite large numbers who think that climate change needs to be dealt with by someone else (principally by China and India),and that Morrison is just the bloke to make sure that this has minimum impact on our current standard of living.
I bet if you took our population size and our impact we’d be right up the top of polluters and just because it’s smaller than other nations it doesn’t mean we should ignore it.
I didn’t say I agreed with them. In fact I don’t.
It is though quite a hard argument to sell that we should be acting at least in proportion to our emissions/head, although all political parties seem to have no trouble at all convincing people that they must do their bit in the case of war.
True isn’t it
sibeen said:
Tanya Plibersek has stated she’s not going to contest the Lab leadership.
How odd. I thought she’d be looking forward to Alan Jones calling her a hysterical frigid slut.
sibeen said:
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:Yes; the manufacturers, their marketers, those that work for them and shareholders etc would care very much about doing a plain packaging thing for cereal ala cigarettes.
All food products in fact it could be for anything in a box or packet, make it law and everyone has to do it and is in the same boat
Hey,same with cars, we could force manufacturers to make the same four cylinder model, have it painted black and sold at the same price.
Not that is somewhat different but what is wrong with plain packing when it goes in the bin anyway, sure the shiny bright boxes attract us like magpies but do you buy something because the box looks pretty
sibeen said:
poikilotherm said:
Cymek said:Even simple things don’t seem to get suggested or proposed
What about all food produce packaging is switched over to recyclable material kept as colourless as possible so various dyes aren’t needed.
Would people even care if a cereal box was made from recycled cardboard with a sticker on it showing the name and what is contains instead of a colourful box you might put into the recycling bin. Even that is doing something.
Yes; the manufacturers, their marketers, those that work for them and shareholders etc would care very much about doing a plain packaging thing for cereal ala cigarettes.
Well, beside the marketers, the advertisers, the manufacturers, the people who work for them and the shareholders no-one else would really care, would they?
That’s what the etc was for eh.
sibeen said:
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:Yes; the manufacturers, their marketers, those that work for them and shareholders etc would care very much about doing a plain packaging thing for cereal ala cigarettes.
All food products in fact it could be for anything in a box or packet, make it law and everyone has to do it and is in the same boat
Hey,same with cars, we could force manufacturers to make the same four cylinder model, have it painted black and sold at the same price.
Ha.
Cymek said:
sibeen said:
Cymek said:All food products in fact it could be for anything in a box or packet, make it law and everyone has to do it and is in the same boat
Hey,same with cars, we could force manufacturers to make the same four cylinder model, have it painted black and sold at the same price.
Not that is somewhat different but what is wrong with plain packing when it goes in the bin anyway, sure the shiny bright boxes attract us like magpies but do you buy something because the box looks pretty
And everything should be coloured various shades of Grey, lest anyone get overexcited…
poikilotherm said:
Cymek said:
sibeen said:Hey,same with cars, we could force manufacturers to make the same four cylinder model, have it painted black and sold at the same price.
Not that is somewhat different but what is wrong with plain packing when it goes in the bin anyway, sure the shiny bright boxes attract us like magpies but do you buy something because the box looks pretty
And everything should be coloured various shades of Grey, lest anyone get overexcited…
Or we could just make them out of endangered animals and plants
sibeen said:
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:Yes; the manufacturers, their marketers, those that work for them and shareholders etc would care very much about doing a plain packaging thing for cereal ala cigarettes.
All food products in fact it could be for anything in a box or packet, make it law and everyone has to do it and is in the same boat
Hey,same with cars, we could force manufacturers to make the same four cylinder model, have it painted black and sold at the same price.
four cylinders???? four pole please…
https://amp.afr.com/news/politics/national/relieved-ceos-have-a-busy-agenda-for-morrison-20190518-p51oso
Cymek said:
Not that is somewhat different but what is wrong with plain packing when it goes in the bin anyway, sure the shiny bright boxes attract us like magpies but do you buy something because the box looks pretty
We all do, otherwise sellers wouldnt bother but they have found in the dog eat dog world of competition it pays to be bothered.
We are just monkeys that like shiny things.
Christopher Knaus and Nick Evershed
Mon 20 May 2019 15.20 AEST
Integrity experts say the patently false and “scandalous” claims spread during the election give renewed impetus for truth in political advertising laws, saying reform is now a “no-brainer”.
The election was littered with false and exaggerated claims, many of which were propagated by fringe groups on social media and amplified by major parties.
An invention claiming Labor planned to introduce a death tax, for example, appears to have begun on unsourced Facebook pages, spread to other users via direct messages and paid ads, before finally being amplified by Coalition politicians.
Guardian Australia’s project to monitor hidden campaigning on social mediabegan to pick up claims about a Labor “death tax” in mid-April, when users received direct Facebook messages stating “Labor, the Greens and Unions have signed an agreement to introduce a 40% inheritance tax”.
A Facebook message spread by an anonymous third party, misleading voters about Labor’s plans for a death tax.
Other third-party Facebook groups, including an anti-Labor page named Rite-ON!, spread the death tax claim using paid Facebook ads, and it was amplified by Coalition figures, including the Liberal senator Jane Hume and the Queensland LNP MP George Christensen.
Christensen paid for three Facebook ads on Labor’s supposed death tax, one of which said “we know Labor have secret plans to bring in a death tax”.
Social media was also used to spread falsehoods about Labor’s plan to introduce a car tax. The origins of this claim are more obvious. Guardian Australia tracked dozens of paid Liberal party ads spreading the car tax claim into the Facebook newsfeeds of targeted users.
“Bill Shorten and Labor plan to introduce a Car Tax which would increase the cost of nearly all of Australia’s new cars,” one ad, paid for by the Liberal WA branch, said.
Labor – which was itself guilty of spreading the Mediscare falsehood about the Liberals – held no policies to introduce a car or death tax.
Reform has routinely been described as unworkable and a potential restriction of free speech. Previous attempts to regulate advertising have failed dramatically. In the 1980s, parliament attempted to introduce such laws before quickly repealing them.
—-
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/20/false-election-claims-spark-push-for-truth-in-political-advertising-laws?CMP=soc_567
Do we know how PHON and the UAP went in the QLD senate race yet DV?
dv said:
Christopher Knaus and Nick Evershed
Mon 20 May 2019 15.20 AEST
Integrity experts say the patently false and “scandalous” claims spread during the election give renewed impetus for truth in political advertising laws, saying reform is now a “no-brainer”.
The election was littered with false and exaggerated claims, many of which were propagated by fringe groups on social media and amplified by major parties.
An invention claiming Labor planned to introduce a death tax, for example, appears to have begun on unsourced Facebook pages, spread to other users via direct messages and paid ads, before finally being amplified by Coalition politicians.
Guardian Australia’s project to monitor hidden campaigning on social mediabegan to pick up claims about a Labor “death tax” in mid-April, when users received direct Facebook messages stating “Labor, the Greens and Unions have signed an agreement to introduce a 40% inheritance tax”.
A Facebook message spread by an anonymous third party, misleading voters about Labor’s plans for a death tax.
Other third-party Facebook groups, including an anti-Labor page named Rite-ON!, spread the death tax claim using paid Facebook ads, and it was amplified by Coalition figures, including the Liberal senator Jane Hume and the Queensland LNP MP George Christensen.
Christensen paid for three Facebook ads on Labor’s supposed death tax, one of which said “we know Labor have secret plans to bring in a death tax”.
Social media was also used to spread falsehoods about Labor’s plan to introduce a car tax. The origins of this claim are more obvious. Guardian Australia tracked dozens of paid Liberal party ads spreading the car tax claim into the Facebook newsfeeds of targeted users.
“Bill Shorten and Labor plan to introduce a Car Tax which would increase the cost of nearly all of Australia’s new cars,” one ad, paid for by the Liberal WA branch, said.
Labor – which was itself guilty of spreading the Mediscare falsehood about the Liberals – held no policies to introduce a car or death tax.
Reform has routinely been described as unworkable and a potential restriction of free speech. Previous attempts to regulate advertising have failed dramatically. In the 1980s, parliament attempted to introduce such laws before quickly repealing them.
—-
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/20/false-election-claims-spark-push-for-truth-in-political-advertising-laws?CMP=soc_567
Alas, Australian voters who are dumb enough to fall for that shit are unlikely to benefit much from tighter regulation.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Do we know how PHON and the UAP went in the QLD senate race yet DV?
UAP 3%, PHON 10%. I think PHON is a lock for a Qld senate slot now. UaP no chance.
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Do we know how PHON and the UAP went in the QLD senate race yet DV?
UAP 3%, PHON 10%. I think PHON is a lock for a Qld senate slot now. UaP no chance.
Yay. I can live with another PHON senator if Clive didn’t get up.
What the fuck is up with UAP using “Australia’s not gonna cop it any more” in order to reaffirm the status quo
dv said:
What the fuck is up with UAP using “Australia’s not gonna cop it any more” in order to reaffirm the status quo
Cop what?
dv said:
What the fuck is up with UAP using “Australia’s not gonna cop it any more” in order to reaffirm the status quo
yeah, it isn’t even a status quo song.
roughbarked said:
dv said:
What the fuck is up with UAP using “Australia’s not gonna cop it any more” in order to reaffirm the status quo
Cop what?
it
Circles of Protection, i remember that game
dv said:
What the fuck is up with UAP using “Australia’s not gonna cop it any more” in order to reaffirm the status quo
Australia is not going cop any more of this whatever and shit.
dv said:
Reform has routinely been described as unworkable and a potential restriction of free speech.
I don’t get this free speech thing.
Everyone knows there are already tons of restrictions on what you can say in public (even if you don’t play rugby). Why do people still pretend that “free speech” is a thing?
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
What the fuck is up with UAP using “Australia’s not gonna cop it any more” in order to reaffirm the status quo
Australia is not going cop any more of this whatever and shit.
Yep enough is enough we’ve all had a gutful. But try telling that to Shifty Shorten.
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
What the fuck is up with UAP using “Australia’s not gonna cop it any more” in order to reaffirm the status quo
Australia is not going cop any more of this whatever and shit.
Yep enough is enough we’ve all had a gutful. But try telling that to Shifty Shorten.
Dipshit lost the unlosable election, lulz.
poikilotherm said:
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:Australia is not going cop any more of this whatever and shit.
Yep enough is enough we’ve all had a gutful. But try telling that to Shifty Shorten.
Dipshit lost the unlosable election, lulz.
Just another Reptilian place-getter.
Hilary still hasn’t got over the shock of fumbling a sure shot.
poikilotherm said:
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:Australia is not going cop any more of this whatever and shit.
Yep enough is enough we’ve all had a gutful. But try telling that to Shifty Shorten.
Dipshit lost the unlosable election, lulz.
Yes but due to the massive excess of retard amongst Oz voters, for which he can’t really be expected to take the blame.
Bubblecar said:
poikilotherm said:
Bubblecar said:Yep enough is enough we’ve all had a gutful. But try telling that to Shifty Shorten.
Dipshit lost the unlosable election, lulz.
Yes but due to the massive excess of retard amongst Oz voters, for which he can’t really be expected to take the blame.
but but but aren’t aussies special??? i thought they are always portrayed as soooo much better than other groups around the world. you hear it all the time from the media and politicians. Don’t tell me we are just ordinary?
ChrispenEvan said:
Bubblecar said:
poikilotherm said:Dipshit lost the unlosable election, lulz.
Yes but due to the massive excess of retard amongst Oz voters, for which he can’t really be expected to take the blame.
but but but aren’t aussies special??? i thought they are always portrayed as soooo much better than other groups around the world. you hear it all the time from the media and politicians. Don’t tell me we are just ordinary?
Many of them are special, but not in the way they think.
Bubblecar said:
poikilotherm said:
Bubblecar said:Yep enough is enough we’ve all had a gutful. But try telling that to Shifty Shorten.
Dipshit lost the unlosable election, lulz.
Yes but due to the massive excess of retard amongst Oz voters, for which he can’t really be expected to take the blame.
It’s a certain kind of special to blame the buyer instead of the shithouse salesman.
It would have been a very different outcome if the polls had be accurate. The ALP might have tempered their somewhat radical agenda.
poikilotherm said:
Bubblecar said:
poikilotherm said:Dipshit lost the unlosable election, lulz.
Yes but due to the massive excess of retard amongst Oz voters, for which he can’t really be expected to take the blame.
It’s a certain kind of special to blame the buyer instead of the shithouse salesman.
ZING!
poikilotherm said:
Bubblecar said:
poikilotherm said:Dipshit lost the unlosable election, lulz.
Yes but due to the massive excess of retard amongst Oz voters, for which he can’t really be expected to take the blame.
It’s a certain kind of special to blame the buyer instead of the shithouse salesman.
Shithouse salesman? Nah, they just didn’t like his face.
“I reckon ‘is forehead is too big and Scomo looks friendlier.”
“Yeak Scomo’s a top bloke I’m votin’ Scomo.”
blah.
Bubble is too intelligent to vote, it messes his hair.
AwesomeO said:
Bubble is too intelligent to vote, it messes his hair.
LOL
“Om not votin’ for Shorten ‘e looks shifty.”
“Yeah thas’ what Clive says an’ I reckon e’s right.”
“As Scomo says where did Labor get us last time? Just a fucken ascession and norn eleven, that’s what. Fucken muzzos. Shifty Shorten can get fuckted.”
“Orr Reckon.”
to be fair private schooling is a very neat solution
ensure that anyone who gets a proper education will be privileged and support you
and everyone else won’t know the difference
Would the Libs got back in without the Clive Palmer effect?
Does anyone else think political funding of election campaigns should be capped tot 10 million?
Tau.Neutrino said:
Does anyone else think political funding of election campaigns should be capped tot 10 million?
Not me, capping encourages circumvention which is a slide toward corruption. And if people or companies want to give money that’s there look out, not mine.
Just have it visible so influence can be seen.
Bubblecar said:
dv said:Christopher Knaus and Nick Evershed
Mon 20 May 2019 15.20 AEST
Integrity experts say the patently false and “scandalous” claims spread during the election give renewed impetus for truth in political advertising laws, saying reform is now a “no-brainer”.
The election was littered with false and exaggerated claims, many of which were propagated by fringe groups on social media and amplified by major parties.
An invention claiming Labor planned to introduce a death tax, for example, appears to have begun on unsourced Facebook pages, spread to other users via direct messages and paid ads, before finally being amplified by Coalition politicians.
Guardian Australia’s project to monitor hidden campaigning on social mediabegan to pick up claims about a Labor “death tax” in mid-April, when users received direct Facebook messages stating “Labor, the Greens and Unions have signed an agreement to introduce a 40% inheritance tax”.
A Facebook message spread by an anonymous third party, misleading voters about Labor’s plans for a death tax.
Other third-party Facebook groups, including an anti-Labor page named Rite-ON!, spread the death tax claim using paid Facebook ads, and it was amplified by Coalition figures, including the Liberal senator Jane Hume and the Queensland LNP MP George Christensen.
Christensen paid for three Facebook ads on Labor’s supposed death tax, one of which said “we know Labor have secret plans to bring in a death tax”.
Social media was also used to spread falsehoods about Labor’s plan to introduce a car tax. The origins of this claim are more obvious. Guardian Australia tracked dozens of paid Liberal party ads spreading the car tax claim into the Facebook newsfeeds of targeted users.
“Bill Shorten and Labor plan to introduce a Car Tax which would increase the cost of nearly all of Australia’s new cars,” one ad, paid for by the Liberal WA branch, said.
Labor – which was itself guilty of spreading the Mediscare falsehood about the Liberals – held no policies to introduce a car or death tax.
Reform has routinely been described as unworkable and a potential restriction of free speech. Previous attempts to regulate advertising have failed dramatically. In the 1980s, parliament attempted to introduce such laws before quickly repealing them.
—-
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/20/false-election-claims-spark-push-for-truth-in-political-advertising-laws?CMP=soc_567
Alas, Australian voters who are dumb enough to fall for that shit are unlikely to benefit much from tighter regulation.
It got tightened up bipartisanly in the Parliament after the “mediscare” thing. And these posts made me go looking. the “Mediscare” thing was investigated by the AFP and 4 months later they said “nothing to see here then. No laws broken” Not sure where that puts the latest lot.
dv said:
Certainly the Murdoch campaign probably had a significant effect.
I don’t knw why the polls wouldn’t pick it up though.
And I doubt that fear of Murdoch is the reason that people are not talking about it.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Certainly the Murdoch campaign probably had a significant effect.
I don’t knw why the polls wouldn’t pick it up though.
And I doubt that fear of Murdoch is the reason that people are not talking about it.
What do you think is the reason ?
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Certainly the Murdoch campaign probably had a significant effect.
I don’t knw why the polls wouldn’t pick it up though.
And I doubt that fear of Murdoch is the reason that people are not talking about it.
What do you think is the reason ?
The vibe?
Don’t know really.
Maybe people are so used to the Murdoch press, they just don’t see the elephant in the room.
dv said:
He is right.
I’ve mentioned Murdoch much in various posts here and in the Guardian.
But of course he was bolstered by Clive’s saturation bullshit and the shock jocks, some of whom presumably work on non-Murdoch stations.
Looking at it optimistically, buyers of Murdoch papers are mostly old people. People who listen to horrible old shits like Jonesy are mostly old people. People stupid enough to think Fat Clive, Hanson and their ilk talk sense are mostly old people.
We might be witnessing the last hurrah of the Aussie dumdum reactionary voter.
The Libs have snuck in front in Macquarie .
I don’t necessarily want to lend credence to Bubblecar’s theory that Qlders lack political discernment and intellectual sophistication, but we did have someone in auspol saying that one of the reasons he turned away from Labor was the NRL ‘s decision to fire Israel Folau.
Well, if only Shorten had quit before the election, Labor may have won.
Who’s Tanya Plibersek?
Bubblecar said:
Looking at it optimistically, buyers of Murdoch papers are mostly old people. People who listen to horrible old shits like Jonesy are mostly old people. People stupid enough to think Fat Clive, Hanson and their ilk talk sense are mostly old people.We might be witnessing the last hurrah of the Aussie dumdum reactionary voter.
I was about to say that it will be interesting to see the age breakdowns in the exit polls, but then I remembered the exit polls were fucking rubbish.
dv said:
And that’s supposed to be news?
Any you wonder why I don’t read the newspaper?
mollwollfumble said:
Well, if only Shorten had quit before the election, Labor may have won.Who’s Tanya Plibersek?
She’s been the Deputy Leader of the Opposition for 6 years
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
And that’s supposed to be news?
Any you wonder why I don’t read the newspaper?
No I don’t.
I wonder why anyone reads the newspaper.
mollwollfumble said:
Well, if only Shorten had quit before the election, Labor may have won.Who’s Tanya Plibersek?
If you don’t know who TP is by now you probably don’t deserve to vote.
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
And that’s supposed to be news?
Any you wonder why I don’t read the newspaper?
No I don’t.
I wonder why anyone reads the newspaper.
Because the ABC is only any good with radio and TV?
dv said:
The Libs have snuck in front in Macquarie .I don’t necessarily want to lend credence to Bubblecar’s theory that Qlders lack political discernment and intellectual sophistication, but we did have someone in auspol saying that one of the reasons he turned away from Labor was the NRL ‘s decision to fire Israel Folau.
There are electorates where the Informal vote is five times the margin of the TPP.
mollwollfumble said:
Well, if only Shorten had quit before the election, Labor may have won.Who’s Tanya Plibersek?
You’re kidding.
Rule 303 said:
dv said:
The Libs have snuck in front in Macquarie .I don’t necessarily want to lend credence to Bubblecar’s theory that Qlders lack political discernment and intellectual sophistication, but we did have someone in auspol saying that one of the reasons he turned away from Labor was the NRL ‘s decision to fire Israel Folau.
There are electorates where the Informal vote is five times the margin of the TPP.
All the people who drew genitals on the ballot must be disappointed Tony lost
The Lib Dems also appear to be gone, so that’s alright
dv said:
The Lib Dems also appear to be gone, so that’s alright
If only someone would ‘snap’ secret photos of One Notion candidates cycling three abreast in Lyrca….
dv said:
The Libs have snuck in front in Macquarie .I don’t necessarily want to lend credence to Bubblecar’s theory that Qlders lack political discernment and intellectual sophistication, but we did have someone in auspol saying that one of the reasons he turned away from Labor was the NRL ‘s decision to fire Israel Folau.
I guess it’s easier than admitting the dipshit and the parties policies were a fail.
Rule 303 said:
dv said:
The Libs have snuck in front in Macquarie .I don’t necessarily want to lend credence to Bubblecar’s theory that Qlders lack political discernment and intellectual sophistication, but we did have someone in auspol saying that one of the reasons he turned away from Labor was the NRL ‘s decision to fire Israel Folau.
There are electorates where the Informal vote is five times the margin of the TPP.
Really? We need to get a good education campaign going nationally to teach people what used to be called “Civics”. How the country works.
There’s something wrong with Queenlanders!
Its the humidity!
It has increased the water content in their brains so much it has impeded their ability to think properly.!
Bubblecar said:
Looking at it optimistically, buyers of Murdoch papers are mostly old people. People who listen to horrible old shits like Jonesy are mostly old people. People stupid enough to think Fat Clive, Hanson and their ilk talk sense are mostly old people.We might be witnessing the last hurrah of the Aussie dumdum reactionary voter.
One doesn’t have to buy Murdoch’s papers to be impaled by his drivel.
Any of the dozens of television stations spout it, facebook is full of it.
dv said:
The Libs have snuck in front in Macquarie .I don’t necessarily want to lend credence to Bubblecar’s theory that Qlders lack political discernment and intellectual sophistication, but we did have someone in auspol saying that one of the reasons he turned away from Labor was the NRL ‘s decision to fire Israel Folau.
Yes. Everything is an evil plot by Labor.
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
And that’s supposed to be news?
Any you wonder why I don’t read the newspaper?
No I don’t.
I wonder why anyone reads the newspaper.
‘Twas ever thus.
Three essentials if stuck on a desert island:
The Sun
A newspaper
Something to read.
Humphries, B. (I think)
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:And that’s supposed to be news?
Any you wonder why I don’t read the newspaper?
No I don’t.
I wonder why anyone reads the newspaper.
‘Twas ever thus.
Three essentials if stuck on a desert island:
The Sun
A newspaper
Something to read.Humphries, B. (I think)
So you don’t think The Sun ranks as a newspaper?
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:No I don’t.
I wonder why anyone reads the newspaper.
‘Twas ever thus.
Three essentials if stuck on a desert island:
The Sun
A newspaper
Something to read.Humphries, B. (I think)
So you don’t think The Sun ranks as a newspaper?
Well apparently Barry Humphries doesn’t.
That’s the UK Sun btw.
Is there an Aus Sun “newspaper”?
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:No I don’t.
I wonder why anyone reads the newspaper.
‘Twas ever thus.
Three essentials if stuck on a desert island:
The Sun
A newspaper
Something to read.Humphries, B. (I think)
So you don’t think The Sun ranks as a newspaper?
It was apparently penned by B Humphries?
Anyway, neither the sun norsomething to read equates with the word, newspaper.
The Rev Dodgson said:
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:‘Twas ever thus.
Three essentials if stuck on a desert island:
The Sun
A newspaper
Something to read.Humphries, B. (I think)
So you don’t think The Sun ranks as a newspaper?
Well apparently Barry Humphries doesn’t.
That’s the UK Sun btw.
Is there an Aus Sun “newspaper”?
Debatable. There is the Melbourne Sun and the Sun-Herald.
roughbarked said:
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:‘Twas ever thus.
Three essentials if stuck on a desert island:
The Sun
A newspaper
Something to read.Humphries, B. (I think)
So you don’t think The Sun ranks as a newspaper?
It was apparently penned by B Humphries?
Anyway, neither the sun norsomething to read equates with the word, newspaper.
For the benefit of the youngsters here, it comes from the days when the reason for buying The Sun was the daily photo of the top half of a naked young woman on page 3.
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
ChrispenEvan said:So you don’t think The Sun ranks as a newspaper?
Well apparently Barry Humphries doesn’t.
That’s the UK Sun btw.
Is there an Aus Sun “newspaper”?
Debatable. There is the Melbourne Sun and the Sun-Herald.
OK, not at all “Sun” like then.
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:
ChrispenEvan said:So you don’t think The Sun ranks as a newspaper?
It was apparently penned by B Humphries?
Anyway, neither the sun norsomething to read equates with the word, newspaper.
For the benefit of the youngsters here, it comes from the days when the reason for buying The Sun was the daily photo of the top half of a naked young woman on page 3.
It used to be called the Sunday Mirror back then?
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Well apparently Barry Humphries doesn’t.
That’s the UK Sun btw.
Is there an Aus Sun “newspaper”?
Debatable. There is the Melbourne Sun and the Sun-Herald.
OK, not at all “Sun” like then.
That would be it.
The Rev Dodgson said:
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:‘Twas ever thus.
Three essentials if stuck on a desert island:
The Sun
A newspaper
Something to read.Humphries, B. (I think)
So you don’t think The Sun ranks as a newspaper?
Well apparently Barry Humphries doesn’t.
That’s the UK Sun btw.
Is there an Aus Sun “newspaper”?
dunno about now but melb had a Sun newspaper.
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
ChrispenEvan said:So you don’t think The Sun ranks as a newspaper?
Well apparently Barry Humphries doesn’t.
That’s the UK Sun btw.
Is there an Aus Sun “newspaper”?
dunno about now but melb had a Sun newspaper.
Think it was the Sunday Mirror but is now simply referred to as The Sun.
roughbarked said:
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Well apparently Barry Humphries doesn’t.
That’s the UK Sun btw.
Is there an Aus Sun “newspaper”?
dunno about now but melb had a Sun newspaper.
Think it was the Sunday Mirror but is now simply referred to as The Sun.
Nah, I lived in Melb when the sun was around.
ChrispenEvan said:
roughbarked said:
ChrispenEvan said:dunno about now but melb had a Sun newspaper.
Think it was the Sunday Mirror but is now simply referred to as The Sun.
Nah, I lived in Melb when the sun was around.
Well prepared to be incorrect. I’ve only briefly visited Melb, the once.
The Melbourne Sun became the Herald Sun.
The Herald Sun is a morning newspaper based in Melbourne, Australia, published by The Herald and Weekly Times, a subsidiary of News Corp Australia, itself a subsidiary of News Corp. Wikipe
https://blog.rapint.com/2019/05/19/less-educated-australians-swung-to-lnp/
buffy said:
The Melbourne Sun became the Herald Sun.The Herald Sun is a morning newspaper based in Melbourne, Australia, published by The Herald and Weekly Times, a subsidiary of News Corp Australia, itself a subsidiary of News Corp. Wikipe
Thank ye.
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:It was apparently penned by B Humphries?
Anyway, neither the sun norsomething to read equates with the word, newspaper.
For the benefit of the youngsters here, it comes from the days when the reason for buying The Sun was the daily photo of the top half of a naked young woman on page 3.
It used to be called the Sunday Mirror back then?
No, The Sun and the Mirror (including Sunday Mirror) were two totally different papers.
The Mirror was a proper working person’s paper, the like of which we do not have in Australia.
One thing that’s become clear is that the Right used personally targetted social media advertising. This enabled conspiracies that would have alarmed and alerted smart people, such as the death tax and car tax furphies, to only be shown to ignorant people.
There’s no point in moaning about it I suppose. The ALP just needs to pony up the dough to buy those databases from Zuckerboy and fight fire with fire.
dv said:
One thing that’s become clear is that the Right used personally targetted social media advertising. This enabled conspiracies that would have alarmed and alerted smart people, such as the death tax and car tax furphies, to only be shown to ignorant people.There’s no point in moaning about it I suppose. The ALP just needs to pony up the dough to buy those databases from Zuckerboy and fight fire with fire.
I didn’t realise that Get-up were a rightist group.
Don’t know how I missed that one.
I said NRL, I meant RA
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
One thing that’s become clear is that the Right used personally targetted social media advertising. This enabled conspiracies that would have alarmed and alerted smart people, such as the death tax and car tax furphies, to only be shown to ignorant people.There’s no point in moaning about it I suppose. The ALP just needs to pony up the dough to buy those databases from Zuckerboy and fight fire with fire.
I didn’t realise that Get-up were a rightist group.
Don’t know how I missed that one.
What are you talking about?
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
One thing that’s become clear is that the Right used personally targetted social media advertising. This enabled conspiracies that would have alarmed and alerted smart people, such as the death tax and car tax furphies, to only be shown to ignorant people.There’s no point in moaning about it I suppose. The ALP just needs to pony up the dough to buy those databases from Zuckerboy and fight fire with fire.
I didn’t realise that Get-up were a rightist group.
Don’t know how I missed that one.
What are you talking about?
GetUP! spent a significant amount of money during the election pushing left stuff.
dv said:
The Libs have snuck in front in Macquarie .I don’t necessarily want to lend credence to Bubblecar’s theory that Qlders lack political discernment and intellectual sophistication, but we did have someone in auspol saying that one of the reasons he turned away from Labor was the NRL ‘s decision to fire Israel Folau.
Yes, Labor’s refusal to condemn this racist act certainly doesn’t look good.
But then Liberal didn’t come out and condemn it clearly either did they?
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
One thing that’s become clear is that the Right used personally targetted social media advertising. This enabled conspiracies that would have alarmed and alerted smart people, such as the death tax and car tax furphies, to only be shown to ignorant people.There’s no point in moaning about it I suppose. The ALP just needs to pony up the dough to buy those databases from Zuckerboy and fight fire with fire.
I didn’t realise that Get-up were a rightist group.
Don’t know how I missed that one.
What are you talking about?
You seemed to be suggesting that only rightist groups used social media.
Wife’s chat with her retired brother suggests to me that the franking credit thing would have lost Labor significant numbers of votes.
Don’t know why that wouldn’t show up in polls though.
poikilotherm said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I didn’t realise that Get-up were a rightist group.
Don’t know how I missed that one.
What are you talking about?
GetUP! spent a significant amount of money during the election pushing left stuff.
Please read what I wrote. I’m referring to the practice of buying personal information from FB so that ads can be individually tailored to the user, sending a message they want that person to see rather than a message they’d be proud to stand behind generally. I’m not aware Getup has done anything like that. They’ve produced general-consumption progressive advertisements.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I didn’t realise that Get-up were a rightist group.
Don’t know how I missed that one.
What are you talking about?
You seemed to be suggesting that only rightist groups used social media.
Read my response to poik
dv said:
poikilotherm said:
dv said:What are you talking about?
GetUP! spent a significant amount of money during the election pushing left stuff.
Please read what I wrote. I’m referring to the practice of buying personal information from FB so that ads can be individually tailored to the user, sending a message they want that person to see rather than a message they’d be proud to stand behind generally. I’m not aware Getup has done anything like that. They’ve produced general-consumption progressive advertisements.
Poik is a bit naive politically.
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:What are you talking about?
You seemed to be suggesting that only rightist groups used social media.
Read my response to poik
you are too subtle DV.
:-)
ChrispenEvan said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:You seemed to be suggesting that only rightist groups used social media.
Read my response to poik
you are too subtle DV.
:-)
That did occur to me…
ChrispenEvan said:
dv said:
poikilotherm said:GetUP! spent a significant amount of money during the election pushing left stuff.
Please read what I wrote. I’m referring to the practice of buying personal information from FB so that ads can be individually tailored to the user, sending a message they want that person to see rather than a message they’d be proud to stand behind generally. I’m not aware Getup has done anything like that. They’ve produced general-consumption progressive advertisements.
Poik is a bit naive politically.
lulz.
poikilotherm said:
ChrispenEvan said:
dv said:Please read what I wrote. I’m referring to the practice of buying personal information from FB so that ads can be individually tailored to the user, sending a message they want that person to see rather than a message they’d be proud to stand behind generally. I’m not aware Getup has done anything like that. They’ve produced general-consumption progressive advertisements.
Poik is a bit naive politically.
lulz.
:-)
dv said:
poikilotherm said:
dv said:What are you talking about?
GetUP! spent a significant amount of money during the election pushing left stuff.
Please read what I wrote. I’m referring to the practice of buying personal information from FB so that ads can be individually tailored to the user, sending a message they want that person to see rather than a message they’d be proud to stand behind generally. I’m not aware Getup has done anything like that. They’ve produced general-consumption progressive advertisements.
That’s literally how Facebook advertising works; the more you pay the more targeted it gets and the more ‘personal’ you can make it.
What exactly is the specific marketing the kooks on the right did?
dv said:
One thing that’s become clear is that the Right used personally targetted social media advertising. This enabled conspiracies that would have alarmed and alerted smart people, such as the death tax and car tax furphies, to only be shown to ignorant people.There’s no point in moaning about it I suppose. The ALP just needs to pony up the dough to buy those databases from Zuckerboy and fight fire with fire.
Political parties in Australia have access to personal info that already exceeds what FB could provide. They keep detailed databases on all electors.
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
One thing that’s become clear is that the Right used personally targetted social media advertising. This enabled conspiracies that would have alarmed and alerted smart people, such as the death tax and car tax furphies, to only be shown to ignorant people.There’s no point in moaning about it I suppose. The ALP just needs to pony up the dough to buy those databases from Zuckerboy and fight fire with fire.
Political parties in Australia have access to personal info that already exceeds what FB could provide. They keep detailed databases on all electors.
Targeted ads piss me off more than convincing me to listen or buy to what they are selling
Was Clive in parliament long enough to get a pension and gold card?
Tau.Neutrino said:
There’s something wrong with Queenlanders!
Its the humidity!
It has increased the water content in their brains so much it has impeded their ability to think properly.!
*nods *
I lived there for 9 months when I went to art college. My younger siblings had been there for a few years and had already been infected with the dampness disease. Mum was born into it and dad was infected when he cut cane back before he met my mother. The 3 older siblings are also Queenslanders. It’s the only reason that I am the sane one…..9 months in QLD was not long enough to become one with the damp moistness.
The End
I might develop this little story and see how far I can get with all the other weirdness. Yep.
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:There’s something wrong with Queenlanders!
Its the humidity!
It has increased the water content in their brains so much it has impeded their ability to think properly.!
*nods *
I lived there for 9 months when I went to art college. My younger siblings had been there for a few years and had already been infected with the dampness disease. Mum was born into it and dad was infected when he cut cane back before he met my mother. The 3 older siblings are also Queenslanders. It’s the only reason that I am the sane one…..9 months in QLD was not long enough to become one with the damp moistness.
The End
I might develop this little story and see how far I can get with all the other weirdness. Yep.
How does it get into the brain through the ears or is the skull open to the air
Crossbench senators are saying they will insist on a powerful corruption watchdog, so that’s good.
Cymek said:
kii said:
Tau.Neutrino said:There’s something wrong with Queenlanders!
Its the humidity!
It has increased the water content in their brains so much it has impeded their ability to think properly.!
*nods *
I lived there for 9 months when I went to art college. My younger siblings had been there for a few years and had already been infected with the dampness disease. Mum was born into it and dad was infected when he cut cane back before he met my mother. The 3 older siblings are also Queenslanders. It’s the only reason that I am the sane one…..9 months in QLD was not long enough to become one with the damp moistness.
The End
I might develop this little story and see how far I can get with all the other weirdness. Yep.
How does it get into the brain through the ears or is the skull open to the air
When I escaped Brisbane I went to live In Tamarama and swam in the ocean every day. It cured me.
I’m a tad bored.
kii said:
I’m a tad bored.
Can we help?
dv said:
kii said:
I’m a tad bored.
Can we help?
You need to do some mowing. Quickens the blood, excites the mind.
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
kii said:
I’m a tad bored.
Can we help?
You need to do some mowing. Quickens the blood, excites the mind.
The grass is mostly a slow growing variety, and the dogs have murdered patches of it with their urine.
kii said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:Can we help?
You need to do some mowing. Quickens the blood, excites the mind.
The grass is mostly a slow growing variety, and the dogs have murdered patches of it with their urine.
When sarah and bren were bored, I used to tell them to do some charity work. Maybe you should go drop some water and snacks to the people in wire cages at the border.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
The Libs have snuck in front in Macquarie .I don’t necessarily want to lend credence to Bubblecar’s theory that Qlders lack political discernment and intellectual sophistication, but we did have someone in auspol saying that one of the reasons he turned away from Labor was the NRL ‘s decision to fire Israel Folau.
Yes, Labor’s refusal to condemn this racist act certainly doesn’t look good.
But then Liberal didn’t come out and condemn it clearly either did they?
Having to pay a social penalty for stoking anti-gay bigotry now amounts to “racism” in the Rev’s strange scheme of things.
dv said:
kii said:
Witty Rejoinder said:You need to do some mowing. Quickens the blood, excites the mind.
The grass is mostly a slow growing variety, and the dogs have murdered patches of it with their urine.
When sarah and bren were bored, I used to tell them to do some charity work. Maybe you should go drop some water and snacks to the people in wire cages at the border.
:P
Yes, Papa dv.
I’m mostly bored with how slow the descent into hell is.
We took a huge amount of men’s coats (mr kii is a coat hoarder) blankets (also mr kii), toys, pencils, crayons, jigsaw puzzles to the Gospel Mission at the beginning. It’s just around the corner. The people here are on their way to other places, the border police drop them off at various points around the city.
Next week we have to go to El Paso, so the caged kids might welcome some chippies and Fanta.
My brain is overwhelmed by the magnitude of this.
kii said:
dv said:
kii said:The grass is mostly a slow growing variety, and the dogs have murdered patches of it with their urine.
When sarah and bren were bored, I used to tell them to do some charity work. Maybe you should go drop some water and snacks to the people in wire cages at the border.
:P
Yes, Papa dv.
I’m mostly bored with how slow the descent into hell is.
We took a huge amount of men’s coats (mr kii is a coat hoarder) blankets (also mr kii), toys, pencils, crayons, jigsaw puzzles to the Gospel Mission at the beginning. It’s just around the corner. The people here are on their way to other places, the border police drop them off at various points around the city.
Next week we have to go to El Paso, so the caged kids might welcome some chippies and Fanta.
My brain is overwhelmed by the magnitude of this.
“How slow the descent into hell is”
Damn, I thought it was ticking along nicely
dv said:
kii said:
dv said:When sarah and bren were bored, I used to tell them to do some charity work. Maybe you should go drop some water and snacks to the people in wire cages at the border.
:P
Yes, Papa dv.
I’m mostly bored with how slow the descent into hell is.
We took a huge amount of men’s coats (mr kii is a coat hoarder) blankets (also mr kii), toys, pencils, crayons, jigsaw puzzles to the Gospel Mission at the beginning. It’s just around the corner. The people here are on their way to other places, the border police drop them off at various points around the city.
Next week we have to go to El Paso, so the caged kids might welcome some chippies and Fanta.
My brain is overwhelmed by the magnitude of this.
“How slow the descent into hell is”
Damn, I thought it was ticking along nicely
I like my Bandaids ripped off fast. If I’m going to be hung on the wall, I’d rather it happens before the hell of summer arrives.
Surely has turned out to be an interesting ol’ election result… not what I was expecting at all…
Seems that issues related to climate change and the “anti-Adani” sentiment really played against the broader left in regional and rural Queensland, while everywhere else people didn’t really understand what the ALP was trying to do with franking credits and negative gearing (in my mind they should have focused much more on change to concessions to capital gains tax).
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
diddly-squat said:
.
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
He’s not a bully.
They wanted a bully.
Welcome to America.
kii said:
diddly-squat said:.
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
He’s not a bully.
They wanted a bully.
Welcome to America.
I’m not sure people necessarily “wanted a bully”, but for what ever reason Bill just hasn’t ever resonated well with the electorate.
The Libs will probably go on to lose another three years of polls as their policy platform is near non-existent… but unless the ALP can actually find a leader with even a little bit of charisma I’d suggest they are destined to spend at least the next two terms in opposition…
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:.
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
He’s not a bully.
They wanted a bully.
Welcome to America.
I’m not sure people necessarily “wanted a bully”, but for what ever reason Bill just hasn’t ever resonated well with the electorate.
The Libs will probably go on to lose another three years of polls as their policy platform is near non-existent… but unless the ALP can actually find a leader with even a little bit of charisma I’d suggest they are destined to spend at least the next two terms in opposition…
Morrison is a bully. The Australian people have been brainwashed to believe that a bully is a good thing. He’s a nasty Evangelical bully and he’s a fake.
kii said:
dv said:
kii said::P
Yes, Papa dv.
I’m mostly bored with how slow the descent into hell is.
We took a huge amount of men’s coats (mr kii is a coat hoarder) blankets (also mr kii), toys, pencils, crayons, jigsaw puzzles to the Gospel Mission at the beginning. It’s just around the corner. The people here are on their way to other places, the border police drop them off at various points around the city.
Next week we have to go to El Paso, so the caged kids might welcome some chippies and Fanta.
My brain is overwhelmed by the magnitude of this.
“How slow the descent into hell is”
Damn, I thought it was ticking along nicely
I like my Bandaids ripped off fast. If I’m going to be hung on the wall, I’d rather it happens before the hell of summer arrives.
Don’t worry, there might be big war soon, that’ll speed things up a bit.
diddly-squat said:
Surely has turned out to be an interesting ol’ election result… not what I was expecting at all…
Seems that issues related to climate change and the “anti-Adani” sentiment really played against the broader left in regional and rural Queensland, while everywhere else people didn’t really understand what the ALP was trying to do with franking credits and negative gearing (in my mind they should have focused much more on change to concessions to capital gains tax).
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
diddly-squat said:
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
Naahhh it’s been pretty consistent, Labor was great, people are just too stupid and thick or nazis and don’t think of the children.
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:He’s not a bully.
They wanted a bully.
Welcome to America.
I’m not sure people necessarily “wanted a bully”, but for what ever reason Bill just hasn’t ever resonated well with the electorate.
The Libs will probably go on to lose another three years of polls as their policy platform is near non-existent… but unless the ALP can actually find a leader with even a little bit of charisma I’d suggest they are destined to spend at least the next two terms in opposition…
Morrison is a bully. The Australian people have been brainwashed to believe that a bully is a good thing. He’s a nasty Evangelical bully and he’s a fake.
meh… I mean I’m not a fan of his religion or his politics, but there’s little doubt he’s a shrewd politician…
The fact remains many people voted for “not ALP” as opposed to voting for the LibNats so I’d suggest it was less about Morrison per se and more about Shorts and the ALP policy platform.
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
dv said:“How slow the descent into hell is”
Damn, I thought it was ticking along nicely
I like my Bandaids ripped off fast. If I’m going to be hung on the wall, I’d rather it happens before the hell of summer arrives.
Don’t worry, there might be big war soon, that’ll speed things up a bit.
I’m wondering if NM gets annexed by Mexico. Is that the correct word? I have 2 Australian flags to hang on my fences, to show that I am not an American. mr kii can hide in the storage room behind some false paneling.
I thought Labor would get in precisely because they were generating policies and had ideas. Libs were standing for nothing but more of the same of nothing…cept going backwards. Which is why Hilary rejected, people, rejected more of the same. An odd juxtaposition..
AwesomeO said:
diddly-squat said:I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
Naahhh it’s been pretty consistent, Labor was great, people are just too stupid and thick or nazis and don’t think of the children.
well yes.. and sucked in you pinko-lefty because we won…
I do find that there is a schism building in the Australian population.. and the divide between the two sides appears to be getting deeper, while the gaps between the two widens…
I think we’re seeing a lot, a real lot of over analysing.
ScoMo beat Bill.
Move along.
Peak Warming Man said:
I think we’re seeing a lot, a real lot of over analysing.ScoMo beat Bill.
Move along.
ScoMo is a fake. He is Morrison and he is a thug.
Could Labour clone Bob Hawke now he’s dead and find a way to fast grow him and teach him to become the new leader of the party
Cymek said:
Could Labour clone Bob Hawke now he’s dead and find a way to fast grow him and teach him to become the new leader of the party
You’d need a time machine to go back to the 80s as well…
poikilotherm said:
Cymek said:
Could Labour clone Bob Hawke now he’s dead and find a way to fast grow him and teach him to become the new leader of the party
You’d need a time machine to go back to the 80s as well…
Teach him our new modern ways perhaps
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:
Cymek said:
Could Labour clone Bob Hawke now he’s dead and find a way to fast grow him and teach him to become the new leader of the party
You’d need a time machine to go back to the 80s as well…
Teach him our new modern ways perhaps
Bob Hawke would nave have got past first base today. Given his admitted drunkery, bullying, anger tantrums, philandering and the rest, combined with today’s social media. Nowdays? All you need to have said is “bother, heck, or poo poo” twenty years ago, and that’s it Charlie. You’re gone.
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:
Cymek said:
Could Labour clone Bob Hawke now he’s dead and find a way to fast grow him and teach him to become the new leader of the party
You’d need a time machine to go back to the 80s as well…
Teach him our new modern ways perhaps
That’s the difference though, much more interconnected, that’s why labor started dropping tariffs, it was unsustainable. We are much more at the mercy of international movements. I could mention selling off the govt agencies but that would make labor pragmatic centre and not pinko lefties.
Woodie said:
“The punters know that the horse named Morality rarely gets past the post, whereas the nag named Self-interest always runs a good race.”
Woodie said:
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:You’d need a time machine to go back to the 80s as well…
Teach him our new modern ways perhaps
Bob Hawke would nave have got past first base today. Given his admitted drunkery, bullying, anger tantrums, philandering and the rest, combined with today’s social media. Nowdays? All you need to have said is “bother, heck, or poo poo” twenty years ago, and that’s it Charlie. You’re gone.
GSEOH
Woodie said:
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:You’d need a time machine to go back to the 80s as well…
Teach him our new modern ways perhaps
Bob Hawke would nave have got past first base today. Given his admitted drunkery, bullying, anger tantrums, philandering and the rest, combined with today’s social media. Nowdays? All you need to have said is “bother, heck, or poo poo” twenty years ago, and that’s it Charlie. You’re gone.
Ha, damn straight.
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:
diddly-squat said:I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
Naahhh it’s been pretty consistent, Labor was great, people are just too stupid and thick or nazis and don’t think of the children.
well yes.. and sucked in you pinko-lefty because we won…
I do find that there is a schism building in the Australian population.. and the divide between the two sides appears to be getting deeper, while the gaps between the two widens…
Divide and conquer has always worked very nicely. Have the two sides squabbling and the plundering will go unseen.
Woodie said:
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:You’d need a time machine to go back to the 80s as well…
Teach him our new modern ways perhaps
Bob Hawke would nave have got past first base today. Given his admitted drunkery, bullying, anger tantrums, philandering and the rest, combined with today’s social media. Nowdays? All you need to have said is “bother, heck, or poo poo” twenty years ago, and that’s it Charlie. You’re gone.
so essentially he was a Donald that drinks…
Woodie said:
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:You’d need a time machine to go back to the 80s as well…
Teach him our new modern ways perhaps
Bob Hawke would nave have got past first base today. Given his admitted drunkery, bullying, anger tantrums, philandering and the rest, combined with today’s social media. Nowdays? All you need to have said is “bother, heck, or poo poo” twenty years ago, and that’s it Charlie. You’re gone.
But here we are, still lumbered with Barnaby.
diddly-squat said:
people didn’t really understand what the ALP was trying to do with franking credits and negative gearing (in my mind they should have focused much more on change to concessions to capital gains tax).
Totally agree.
The trouble is I suppose that reducing CGT concessions would cost people money, even if they were not evil investors in residential property.
ruby said:
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:Naahhh it’s been pretty consistent, Labor was great, people are just too stupid and thick or nazis and don’t think of the children.
well yes.. and sucked in you pinko-lefty because we won…
I do find that there is a schism building in the Australian population.. and the divide between the two sides appears to be getting deeper, while the gaps between the two widens…
Divide and conquer has always worked very nicely. Have the two sides squabbling and the plundering will go unseen.
I’m not convinced of that.. there has typically been a fairly mobile swing vote in Australia.. this thing I find a little weird is that it seems like the same group that punished the ALP for their leader shenanigans, rewarded the LibNats for theirs… go figure
Peak Warming Man said:
I think we’re seeing a lot, a real lot of over analysing.ScoMo beat Bill.
Move along.
True, it was all about a fake packaged personality beating another personality, because too many voters have shit for brains and only care about superficialities.
dv said:
poikilotherm said:
dv said:What are you talking about?
GetUP! spent a significant amount of money during the election pushing left stuff.
Please read what I wrote. I’m referring to the practice of buying personal information from FB so that ads can be individually tailored to the user, sending a message they want that person to see rather than a message they’d be proud to stand behind generally. I’m not aware Getup has done anything like that. They’ve produced general-consumption progressive advertisements.
Well that’s not what you wrote. You just said “personally targeted”, and Get-up use of social media is effectively personally targeted, even if they don’t buy info from Facebook or whoever.
But labor replaced theirs with a girl. A girl! Then they replaced the girl with the one they forgot was pretty bad to start off with. The Liberals replaced one who offended the left with one who offended the right before settling on one who was just a bit ordinary…
furious said:
- this thing I find a little weird is that it seems like the same group that punished the ALP for their leader shenanigans, rewarded the LibNats for theirs… go figure
But labor replaced theirs with a girl. A girl! Then they replaced the girl with the one they forgot was pretty bad to start off with. The Liberals replaced one who offended the left with one who offended the right before settling on one who was just a bit ordinary…
When you have mates that own 70% of the media, and are happy to back you because you have business interests that align, the weirdness gets a little less so.
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
The Libs have snuck in front in Macquarie .I don’t necessarily want to lend credence to Bubblecar’s theory that Qlders lack political discernment and intellectual sophistication, but we did have someone in auspol saying that one of the reasons he turned away from Labor was the NRL ‘s decision to fire Israel Folau.
Yes, Labor’s refusal to condemn this racist act certainly doesn’t look good.
But then Liberal didn’t come out and condemn it clearly either did they?
Having to pay a social penalty for stoking anti-gay bigotry now amounts to “racism” in the Rev’s strange scheme of things.
I didn’t know there was a social penalty as well. I thought he was just sacked from his well paying job.
The bigotry was not anti-gay, it was equally anti all fornicators, as well as several other groups.
Applying a severe penalty to a non-white person, when whites guilty of much more serious offences get nothing or much less severe penalties, would certainly be seen as racist under different circumstances.
I guess the bit I don’t really understand is that during the election no one in the ALP was of the opinion that “we’ve totally missed the mark here” and neither did anyone in the LibNat camp or the media.. so the question is, if it’s so obvious now… why wasn’t it obvious during the campaign?
My reaction to the election
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Yes, Labor’s refusal to condemn this racist act certainly doesn’t look good.
But then Liberal didn’t come out and condemn it clearly either did they?
Having to pay a social penalty for stoking anti-gay bigotry now amounts to “racism” in the Rev’s strange scheme of things.
I didn’t know there was a social penalty as well. I thought he was just sacked from his well paying job.
The bigotry was not anti-gay, it was equally anti all fornicators, as well as several other groups.
Applying a severe penalty to a non-white person, when whites guilty of much more serious offences get nothing or much less severe penalties, would certainly be seen as racist under different circumstances.
Being sacked for being persistently anti-social is a well-deserved social penalty.
Trying to find a “race angle” in this issue is simply barmy.
diddly-squat said:
I guess the bit I don’t really understand is that during the election no one in the ALP was of the opinion that “we’ve totally missed the mark here” and neither did anyone in the LibNat camp or the media.. so the question is, if it’s so obvious now… why wasn’t it obvious during the campaign?
There was an unusual systematic polling error across all pollsters, particularly in Qld, the cause of which will I suppose be discussed in coming months. That’s basically it. Polling in Australia has been very reliable for decades to the point that politicians use it as a check on how they are doing.
kii said:
I’m a tad bored.
I’ve got a cure for that…sort the kindling and stack it neatly.
That was one of the things I did this morning. You can see Bruna annoying Mr Cockatiel in his aviary. I’m not sure this augers well for my retirement. I might find it necessary to sort into three sizes, not just two…
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
I guess the bit I don’t really understand is that during the election no one in the ALP was of the opinion that “we’ve totally missed the mark here” and neither did anyone in the LibNat camp or the media.. so the question is, if it’s so obvious now… why wasn’t it obvious during the campaign?There was an unusual systematic polling error across all pollsters, particularly in Qld, the cause of which will I suppose be discussed in coming months. That’s basically it. Polling in Australia has been very reliable for decades to the point that politicians use it as a check on how they are doing.
Damn those Ruskies
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:Having to pay a social penalty for stoking anti-gay bigotry now amounts to “racism” in the Rev’s strange scheme of things.
I didn’t know there was a social penalty as well. I thought he was just sacked from his well paying job.
The bigotry was not anti-gay, it was equally anti all fornicators, as well as several other groups.
Applying a severe penalty to a non-white person, when whites guilty of much more serious offences get nothing or much less severe penalties, would certainly be seen as racist under different circumstances.
Being sacked for being persistently anti-social is a well-deserved social penalty.
Trying to find a “race angle” in this issue is simply barmy.
Well no it isn’t. Lots of people are persistently anti-social with no penalty at all, let alone being sacked, which is how it should be.
But we’ve been over all that before so there’s not much point going over it again.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
I guess the bit I don’t really understand is that during the election no one in the ALP was of the opinion that “we’ve totally missed the mark here” and neither did anyone in the LibNat camp or the media.. so the question is, if it’s so obvious now… why wasn’t it obvious during the campaign?There was an unusual systematic polling error across all pollsters, particularly in Qld, the cause of which will I suppose be discussed in coming months. That’s basically it. Polling in Australia has been very reliable for decades to the point that politicians use it as a check on how they are doing.
So because the polls were aligned people just figured it was all ok?? Seems weird to me if the reasons for failure are now “obvious”
The Rev Dodgson said:
You just said “personally targeted”
i did not, and neither did ‘e, it was associated with letters in the form “advert” and more
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I didn’t know there was a social penalty as well. I thought he was just sacked from his well paying job.
The bigotry was not anti-gay, it was equally anti all fornicators, as well as several other groups.
Applying a severe penalty to a non-white person, when whites guilty of much more serious offences get nothing or much less severe penalties, would certainly be seen as racist under different circumstances.
Being sacked for being persistently anti-social is a well-deserved social penalty.
Trying to find a “race angle” in this issue is simply barmy.
Well no it isn’t. Lots of people are persistently anti-social with no penalty at all, let alone being sacked, which is how it should be.
But we’ve been over all that before so there’s not much point going over it again.
You seriously think that anti-social behaviour should carry no social penalty?
That’s a very eccentric view, to say the least :)
SCIENCE said:
The Rev Dodgson said:You just said “personally targeted”
i did not, and neither did ‘e, it was associated with letters in the form “advert” and more
I have no idea what your point is, if any.
And I haven’t commented on what you did or didn’t say.
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:Being sacked for being persistently anti-social is a well-deserved social penalty.
Trying to find a “race angle” in this issue is simply barmy.
Well no it isn’t. Lots of people are persistently anti-social with no penalty at all, let alone being sacked, which is how it should be.
But we’ve been over all that before so there’s not much point going over it again.
You seriously think that anti-social behaviour should carry no social penalty?
That’s a very eccentric view, to say the least :)
I didn’t say any such thing. In fact I explicitly said I was not talking about social penalties.
I am talking about people being sacked for actions that have nothing to do with their employment.
AwesomeO said:
I thought Labor would get in precisely because they were generating policies and had ideas. Libs were standing for nothing but more of the same of nothing…cept going backwards. Which is why Hilary rejected, people, rejected more of the same. An odd juxtaposition..
I thought this too.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
I guess the bit I don’t really understand is that during the election no one in the ALP was of the opinion that “we’ve totally missed the mark here” and neither did anyone in the LibNat camp or the media.. so the question is, if it’s so obvious now… why wasn’t it obvious during the campaign?There was an unusual systematic polling error across all pollsters, particularly in Qld, the cause of which will I suppose be discussed in coming months. That’s basically it. Polling in Australia has been very reliable for decades to the point that politicians use it as a check on how they are doing.
So because the polls were aligned people just figured it was all ok?? Seems weird to me if the reasons for failure are now “obvious”
The reasons for the polling failure aren’t “obvious”, or even obvious.
Woodie said:
Thanks Woodie, I like that one. :)
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Well no it isn’t. Lots of people are persistently anti-social with no penalty at all, let alone being sacked, which is how it should be.
But we’ve been over all that before so there’s not much point going over it again.
You seriously think that anti-social behaviour should carry no social penalty?
That’s a very eccentric view, to say the least :)
I didn’t say any such thing. In fact I explicitly said I was not talking about social penalties.
I am talking about people being sacked for actions that have nothing to do with their employment.
Then you’re talking about a different topic altogether, because Folau was sacked for anti-social behaviour that explicitly violated his contract.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Well no it isn’t. Lots of people are persistently anti-social with no penalty at all, let alone being sacked, which is how it should be.
But we’ve been over all that before so there’s not much point going over it again.
You seriously think that anti-social behaviour should carry no social penalty?
That’s a very eccentric view, to say the least :)
I didn’t say any such thing. In fact I explicitly said I was not talking about social penalties.
I am talking about people being sacked for actions that have nothing to do with their employment.
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:You seriously think that anti-social behaviour should carry no social penalty?
That’s a very eccentric view, to say the least :)
I didn’t say any such thing. In fact I explicitly said I was not talking about social penalties.
I am talking about people being sacked for actions that have nothing to do with their employment.
Then you’re talking about a different topic altogether, because Folau was sacked for anti-social behaviour that explicitly violated his contract.
We have been through the “he violated his contract” nonsense before.
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:You seriously think that anti-social behaviour should carry no social penalty?
That’s a very eccentric view, to say the least :)
I didn’t say any such thing. In fact I explicitly said I was not talking about social penalties.
I am talking about people being sacked for actions that have nothing to do with their employment.
As public figures perhaps sportspeople are paid the big money to be non-controversial.
No, they are paid big money to be successful sports people.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I didn’t say any such thing. In fact I explicitly said I was not talking about social penalties.
I am talking about people being sacked for actions that have nothing to do with their employment.
As public figures perhaps sportspeople are paid the big money to be non-controversial.No, they are paid big money to be successful sports people.
You seem to be very sure of yourself.
Bubblecar said:
Peak Warming Man said:
I think we’re seeing a lot, a real lot of over analysing.ScoMo beat Bill.
Move along.
True, it was all about a fake packaged personality beating another personality, because too many voters have shit for brains and only care about superficialities.
BINGO!!!!!
diddly-squat said:
Surely has turned out to be an interesting ol’ election result… not what I was expecting at all…
Seems that issues related to climate change and the “anti-Adani” sentiment really played against the broader left in regional and rural Queensland, while everywhere else people didn’t really understand what the ALP was trying to do with franking credits and negative gearing (in my mind they should have focused much more on change to concessions to capital gains tax).
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
That’s roughly right imo.
Labor had a very broad reforming agenda. L/NP essentially had none. They chose to tell lies, distort the language around the Lab policies and scare the shit out of everyone. Hide all the hopeless ministers (nearly all the cabinet) and run a one man show.
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I didn’t say any such thing. In fact I explicitly said I was not talking about social penalties.
I am talking about people being sacked for actions that have nothing to do with their employment.
Then you’re talking about a different topic altogether, because Folau was sacked for anti-social behaviour that explicitly violated his contract.
We have been through the “he violated his contract” nonsense before.
Except it isn’t nonsense, it’s a fact.
You might not have been willing to sign such a contract but Folau did, and then persistently violated it.
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:Then you’re talking about a different topic altogether, because Folau was sacked for anti-social behaviour that explicitly violated his contract.
We have been through the “he violated his contract” nonsense before.
Except it isn’t nonsense, it’s a fact.
You might not have been willing to sign such a contract but Folau did, and then persistently violated it.
God’s will I imagine
North Queensland is just at the sharp end of what’s happening across Australia
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/21/north-queensland-is-just-at-the-sharp-end-of-whats-happening-across-australia
Ian said:
diddly-squat said:Surely has turned out to be an interesting ol’ election result… not what I was expecting at all…
Seems that issues related to climate change and the “anti-Adani” sentiment really played against the broader left in regional and rural Queensland, while everywhere else people didn’t really understand what the ALP was trying to do with franking credits and negative gearing (in my mind they should have focused much more on change to concessions to capital gains tax).
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
That’s roughly right imo.
Labor had a very broad reforming agenda. L/NP essentially had none. They chose to tell lies, distort the language around the Lab policies and scare the shit out of everyone. Hide all the hopeless ministers (nearly all the cabinet) and run a one man show.
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
Ian said:
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
current day wisdom is, yes, we should have all seen it coming… but it seems no one did
buffy said:
Ian said:
diddly-squat said:Surely has turned out to be an interesting ol’ election result… not what I was expecting at all…
Seems that issues related to climate change and the “anti-Adani” sentiment really played against the broader left in regional and rural Queensland, while everywhere else people didn’t really understand what the ALP was trying to do with franking credits and negative gearing (in my mind they should have focused much more on change to concessions to capital gains tax).
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
That’s roughly right imo.
Labor had a very broad reforming agenda. L/NP essentially had none. They chose to tell lies, distort the language around the Lab policies and scare the shit out of everyone. Hide all the hopeless ministers (nearly all the cabinet) and run a one man show.
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
What issues do you predict being influenced by Scummo’s religion beyond the freedom of religion v speech thing?
buffy said:
Ian said:
diddly-squat said:Surely has turned out to be an interesting ol’ election result… not what I was expecting at all…
Seems that issues related to climate change and the “anti-Adani” sentiment really played against the broader left in regional and rural Queensland, while everywhere else people didn’t really understand what the ALP was trying to do with franking credits and negative gearing (in my mind they should have focused much more on change to concessions to capital gains tax).
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
That’s roughly right imo.
Labor had a very broad reforming agenda. L/NP essentially had none. They chose to tell lies, distort the language around the Lab policies and scare the shit out of everyone. Hide all the hopeless ministers (nearly all the cabinet) and run a one man show.
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
I’m no LibNat fanboi, but I don’t think anything they did was “sinister”
diddly-squat said:
buffy said:
Ian said:That’s roughly right imo.
Labor had a very broad reforming agenda. L/NP essentially had none. They chose to tell lies, distort the language around the Lab policies and scare the shit out of everyone. Hide all the hopeless ministers (nearly all the cabinet) and run a one man show.
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
I’m no LibNat fanboi, but I don’t think anything they did was “sinister”
Oh really?
You’re a Queenslander, aren’t you?
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
buffy said:I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
I’m no LibNat fanboi, but I don’t think anything they did was “sinister”
Oh really?
You’re a Queenslander, aren’t you?
yes, and yes
diddly-squat said:
buffy said:
Ian said:That’s roughly right imo.
Labor had a very broad reforming agenda. L/NP essentially had none. They chose to tell lies, distort the language around the Lab policies and scare the shit out of everyone. Hide all the hopeless ministers (nearly all the cabinet) and run a one man show.
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
I’m no LibNat fanboi, but I don’t think anything they did was “sinister”
Oh, I don’t think he has necessarily done anything sinister yet. The idea of electing an unknown quantity has sinister possibilities. Many of the old members of parliament are gone. You can’t really say it’s more of the same. But we have little idea of what it is.
buffy said:
diddly-squat said:
buffy said:I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
I’m no LibNat fanboi, but I don’t think anything they did was “sinister”
Oh, I don’t think he has necessarily done anything sinister yet. The idea of electing an unknown quantity has sinister possibilities. Many of the old members of parliament are gone. You can’t really say it’s more of the same. But we have little idea of what it is.
Oh I agree completely, that is for a non-change there is certainly is now a lot of uncertainty
buffy said:
Ian said:
diddly-squat said:Surely has turned out to be an interesting ol’ election result… not what I was expecting at all…
Seems that issues related to climate change and the “anti-Adani” sentiment really played against the broader left in regional and rural Queensland, while everywhere else people didn’t really understand what the ALP was trying to do with franking credits and negative gearing (in my mind they should have focused much more on change to concessions to capital gains tax).
And of course, it seems not liking Bill was a massive factor as well…
I do find it interesting though that so many people are not coming out saying exactly where the ALP got it wrong, but these same people were pretty silent during the election.. but anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.
C’est la vie, as they say…
That’s roughly right imo.
Labor had a very broad reforming agenda. L/NP essentially had none. They chose to tell lies, distort the language around the Lab policies and scare the shit out of everyone. Hide all the hopeless ministers (nearly all the cabinet) and run a one man show.
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
Religion, one man show…one of my morning walking buddies mentioned the Christian fundies in America that believe Trump is all part of God’s plan, and so all the crazy stuff he does is OK, God’s got this for ‘us’. And that this thinking may also influence Morrison.
I have seen the commentators saying that he only has a mandate for the tax cuts because that is all he put forward. But there is another way of looking at it. We gave him carte blanche. We said, OK mate, we trust you, we don’t need to know what you intend to do with the country.
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:Then you’re talking about a different topic altogether, because Folau was sacked for anti-social behaviour that explicitly violated his contract.
We have been through the “he violated his contract” nonsense before.
Except it isn’t nonsense, it’s a fact.
You might not have been willing to sign such a contract but Folau did, and then persistently violated it.
All pretty off topic anyway.
I might start a new Fred this evening.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:
The Rev Dodgson said:We have been through the “he violated his contract” nonsense before.
Except it isn’t nonsense, it’s a fact.
You might not have been willing to sign such a contract but Folau did, and then persistently violated it.
All pretty off topic anyway.
I might start a new Fred this evening.
Already there. Fuck I hate feeling like this.
buffy said:
I have seen the commentators saying that he only has a mandate for the tax cuts because that is all he put forward. But there is another way of looking at it. We gave him carte blanche. We said, OK mate, we trust you, we don’t need to know what you intend to do with the country.
(Shrugs)
The result of these elections is that the Coalition control the House of Reps and they have about 40% of the seats in the Senate. Legislation, to be passed, requires passage through both houses. That’s all. They form government and they have to take their chances in the senate.
sarahs mum said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Bubblecar said:Except it isn’t nonsense, it’s a fact.
You might not have been willing to sign such a contract but Folau did, and then persistently violated it.
All pretty off topic anyway.
I might start a new Fred this evening.
Already there. Fuck I hate feeling like this.
Another thre years of it yet.
ruby said:
buffy said:
Ian said:That’s roughly right imo.
Labor had a very broad reforming agenda. L/NP essentially had none. They chose to tell lies, distort the language around the Lab policies and scare the shit out of everyone. Hide all the hopeless ministers (nearly all the cabinet) and run a one man show.
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
Religion, one man show…one of my morning walking buddies mentioned the Christian fundies in America that believe Trump is all part of God’s plan, and so all the crazy stuff he does is OK, God’s got this for ‘us’. And that this thinking may also influence Morrison.
And here was me thinking that God wasn’t goiing to bother destroying the earth again since he messed the dates up on the last one.
buffy said:
diddly-squat said:
buffy said:I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
I’m no LibNat fanboi, but I don’t think anything they did was “sinister”
Oh, I don’t think he has necessarily done anything sinister yet. The idea of electing an unknown quantity has sinister possibilities. Many of the old members of parliament are gone. You can’t really say it’s more of the same. But we have little idea of what it is.
Except that it still has the Duttons and their ilk.
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:
The Rev Dodgson said:All pretty off topic anyway.
I might start a new Fred this evening.
Already there. Fuck I hate feeling like this.
Another thre years of it yet.
I did think as I voted that it might be the last time I voted. (I was maudlin before the election.)
but hey, as far as things go, while this may not be idea in many people’s eye at least elections here are peaceful and there sorts of things we debate are largely either related to bettering social or economic outcomes.
diddly-squat said:
but hey, as far as things go, while this may not be idea in many people’s eye at least elections here are peaceful and there sorts of things we debate are largely either related to bettering social or economic outcomes.
and we have had both Liberal and Labor governments before and we are still able to feel safe and comfortable compared to where all the refugees are fleeing froom.
diddly-squat said:
but hey, as far as things go, while this may not be idea in many people’s eye at least elections here are peaceful and there sorts of things we debate are largely either related to bettering social or economic outcomes.
Sure.
And it does appear that somewhat more people preferred the Coalition over the ALP so we can also say that the electoral system has responded appropriately to the public will.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:but hey, as far as things go, while this may not be idea in many people’s eye at least elections here are peaceful and there sorts of things we debate are largely either related to bettering social or economic outcomes.
Sure.
And it does appear that somewhat more people preferred the Coalition over the ALP so we can also say that the electoral system has responded appropriately to the public will.
the final two party preferred will probably end up quite close.. probably a few hundred thousand votes… so it seem the trick is to have the right people in the right locations
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:but hey, as far as things go, while this may not be idea in many people’s eye at least elections here are peaceful and there sorts of things we debate are largely either related to bettering social or economic outcomes.
Sure.
And it does appear that somewhat more people preferred the Coalition over the ALP so we can also say that the electoral system has responded appropriately to the public will.
the final two party preferred will probably end up quite close.. probably a few hundred thousand votes… so it seem the trick is to have the right people in the right locations
Yeah, swing to Libs has been hovering about 0.5% for a couple of days now.
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
ruby said:
buffy said:
Ian said:That’s roughly right imo.
Labor had a very broad reforming agenda. L/NP essentially had none. They chose to tell lies, distort the language around the Lab policies and scare the shit out of everyone. Hide all the hopeless ministers (nearly all the cabinet) and run a one man show.
All too easy. Should have seen that coming.
I think I’m more scared of the one man show aspect than any of the scare stuff he put up. Really? We really think it’s safe to be electing a government that hides its potential ministers? I think it is sinister. Particularly when you add religion in as well.
Religion, one man show…one of my morning walking buddies mentioned the Christian fundies in America that believe Trump is all part of God’s plan, and so all the crazy stuff he does is OK, God’s got this for ‘us’. And that this thinking may also influence Morrison.
Yep.
Fundies are not fun.
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
No.
One good thing to come from the election, it would appear that it made the CCP unhappy
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
I doubt it
diddly-squat said:
but hey, as far as things go, while this may not be idea in many people’s eye at least elections here are peaceful and there sorts of things we debate are largely either related to bettering social or economic outcomes.
Also destroy the countryside, put at risk people at further risk, eventually restricted family planning services and execute the elderly.
poikilotherm said:
One good thing to come from the election, it would appear that it made the CCP unhappy
We didn’t go full blown nazi.
sarahs mum said:
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
No.
Good.
I don’t forget evil monsters.
kii said:
diddly-squat said:but hey, as far as things go, while this may not be idea in many people’s eye at least elections here are peaceful and there sorts of things we debate are largely either related to bettering social or economic outcomes.
Also destroy the countryside, put at risk people at further risk, eventually restricted family planning services and execute the elderly.
can you direct me to examples of this?
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
Long glossed over.
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:but hey, as far as things go, while this may not be idea in many people’s eye at least elections here are peaceful and there sorts of things we debate are largely either related to bettering social or economic outcomes.
Also destroy the countryside, put at risk people at further risk, eventually restricted family planning services and execute the elderly.
can you direct me to examples of this?
Maybe I can help.
Morrison has explicitly stated that removal of “green tape” is an aim of his government.
I don’t know anything specific said about restricting family planning, but given his religious beliefs, it seems quite possible.
I’ll have to leave the last one to kii.
roughbarked said:
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
Long glossed over.
I’m amazed at how glossed over Barnaby Joyce is. I don’t get that.
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:but hey, as far as things go, while this may not be idea in many people’s eye at least elections here are peaceful and there sorts of things we debate are largely either related to bettering social or economic outcomes.
Also destroy the countryside, put at risk people at further risk, eventually restricted family planning services and execute the elderly.
can you direct me to examples of this?
Have you heard of Google?
I have to attempt sleep.
sarahs mum said:
roughbarked said:
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
Long glossed over.
I’m amazed at how glossed over Barnaby Joyce is. I don’t get that.
He’s just a naughty boy while Shorten is an evil beast.
sarahs mum said:
roughbarked said:
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
Long glossed over.
I’m amazed at how glossed over Barnaby Joyce is. I don’t get that.
Yep.
Fucks his staff member, dumps his wife and blathers about the details on tv
kii said:
sarahs mum said:
roughbarked said:Long glossed over.
I’m amazed at how glossed over Barnaby Joyce is. I don’t get that.
Yep.
Fucks his staff member, dumps his wife and blathers about the details on tv
Helped kill some fish.
sarahs mum said:
kii said:
sarahs mum said:I’m amazed at how glossed over Barnaby Joyce is. I don’t get that.
Yep.
Fucks his staff member, dumps his wife and blathers about the details on tv
Helped kill some fish.
But the main ting is that he made some people very wealthy.
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:Also destroy the countryside, put at risk people at further risk, eventually restricted family planning services and execute the elderly.
can you direct me to examples of this?
Maybe I can help.
Morrison has explicitly stated that removal of “green tape” is an aim of his government.
I don’t know anything specific said about restricting family planning, but given his religious beliefs, it seems quite possible.
I’ll have to leave the last one to kii.
removal of green tape isn’t explicitly a proxy for “destruction on the countryside” and we’ve not seen any evidence of federally imposed changes to abortion laws so I can’t really join those dots I’m afraid…
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:Also destroy the countryside, put at risk people at further risk, eventually restricted family planning services and execute the elderly.
can you direct me to examples of this?
Have you heard of Google?
I have to attempt sleep.
yes, I have heard of Google
sleep well
kii said:
sarahs mum said:
roughbarked said:Long glossed over.
I’m amazed at how glossed over Barnaby Joyce is. I don’t get that.
Yep.
Fucks his staff member, dumps his wife and blathers about the details on tv
in fairness, Shorts had an affair as well…
roughbarked said:
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
Long glossed over.
Which Nazi is worse, the one that took women and children out of the concentration camps or Chris Bowen who put them in, and signed the contracts. Which nazis was it did the never ever settle thing, or even to the end of the queue no advantage test Saint Julia.
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
sarahs mum said:I’m amazed at how glossed over Barnaby Joyce is. I don’t get that.
Yep.
Fucks his staff member, dumps his wife and blathers about the details on tv
in fairness, Shorts had an affair as well…
So perhaps they should be stood down from their jobs for bringing them into disrepute.
HAHAHA probably a prerequisite
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
sarahs mum said:I’m amazed at how glossed over Barnaby Joyce is. I don’t get that.
Yep.
Fucks his staff member, dumps his wife and blathers about the details on tv
in fairness, Shorts had an affair as well…
Had a bit of a bladderd up driving incident as well.
https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/morrison-win-sparks-sharp-lift-in-wholesale-electricity-prices-20190520-p51p7t.html
Morrison win sparks sharp lift in wholesale electricity prices
—-
Lol
dv said:
https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/morrison-win-sparks-sharp-lift-in-wholesale-electricity-prices-20190520-p51p7t.htmlMorrison win sparks sharp lift in wholesale electricity prices
—-
Lol
when in Rome
diddly-squat said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:can you direct me to examples of this?
Maybe I can help.
Morrison has explicitly stated that removal of “green tape” is an aim of his government.
I don’t know anything specific said about restricting family planning, but given his religious beliefs, it seems quite possible.
I’ll have to leave the last one to kii.
removal of green tape isn’t explicitly a proxy for “destruction on the countryside”
Can’t agree with that.
I doubt if he will push the others, or get anything through the senate, even if he does.
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Maybe I can help.
Morrison has explicitly stated that removal of “green tape” is an aim of his government.
I don’t know anything specific said about restricting family planning, but given his religious beliefs, it seems quite possible.
I’ll have to leave the last one to kii.
removal of green tape isn’t explicitly a proxy for “destruction on the countryside”
Can’t agree with that.
I doubt if he will push the others, or get anything through the senate, even if he does.
“green tape” generally refers to the level of bureaucracy associated with environmental and (more so now) social approvals. A change in the level of bureaucracy isn’t necessarily the same as a change in the standard of the environmental conditions that are imposed on a project.
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Maybe I can help.
Morrison has explicitly stated that removal of “green tape” is an aim of his government.
I don’t know anything specific said about restricting family planning, but given his religious beliefs, it seems quite possible.
I’ll have to leave the last one to kii.
removal of green tape isn’t explicitly a proxy for “destruction on the countryside”
Can’t agree with that.
I doubt if he will push the others, or get anything through the senate, even if he does.
The senate’s going to be a hoot.
diddly-squat said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:removal of green tape isn’t explicitly a proxy for “destruction on the countryside”
Can’t agree with that.
I doubt if he will push the others, or get anything through the senate, even if he does.
“green tape” generally refers to the level of bureaucracy associated with environmental and (more so now) social approvals. A change in the level of bureaucracy isn’t necessarily the same as a change in the standard of the environmental conditions that are imposed on a project.
No “green tape” generally refers to any legislation designed to protect the environment that introduces additional time and/or costs for people seeking approvals for development or any other work with an effect on the environment.
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Can’t agree with that.
I doubt if he will push the others, or get anything through the senate, even if he does.
“green tape” generally refers to the level of bureaucracy associated with environmental and (more so now) social approvals. A change in the level of bureaucracy isn’t necessarily the same as a change in the standard of the environmental conditions that are imposed on a project.
No “green tape” generally refers to any legislation designed to protect the environment that introduces additional time and/or costs for people seeking approvals for development or any other work with an effect on the environment.
seems to me that we agree – green tape is an increase in the bureaucratic process, not a change to the underlying standard of the conditions that are imposed.
diddly-squat said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:“green tape” generally refers to the level of bureaucracy associated with environmental and (more so now) social approvals. A change in the level of bureaucracy isn’t necessarily the same as a change in the standard of the environmental conditions that are imposed on a project.
No “green tape” generally refers to any legislation designed to protect the environment that introduces additional time and/or costs for people seeking approvals for development or any other work with an effect on the environment.
seems to me that we agree – green tape is an increase in the bureaucratic process, not a change to the underlying standard of the conditions that are imposed.
Not at all.
No doubt there are examples of bureaucratic processes that could be improved without adverse effects, but in general the term “green tape” is simply a way to attempt to dismiss the legislation without concern about what adverse effects the removal might have.
I thought Greentape was a protest tactic to stop big developments by abusing the approvals process.
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:
The Rev Dodgson said:No “green tape” generally refers to any legislation designed to protect the environment that introduces additional time and/or costs for people seeking approvals for development or any other work with an effect on the environment.
seems to me that we agree – green tape is an increase in the bureaucratic process, not a change to the underlying standard of the conditions that are imposed.
Not at all.
No doubt there are examples of bureaucratic processes that could be improved without adverse effects, but in general the term “green tape” is simply a way to attempt to dismiss the legislation without concern about what adverse effects the removal might have.
what I’ve witnessed is an increase in what I would call “green tape” associated with mining approvals that places exhaustive burdens of proof on the applicant without fundamentally changing the the standard of the underlying conditions… For instance an increase in the amount of time over which a base line study, for let’s say for approval of a water license, is carried out but not a change in level of suspended solids in any discharge.
This means it takes the applicant longer and costs them more to gain a license without changing the environmental impact of the condition that is imposed.
AwesomeO said:
I thought Greentape was a protest tactic to stop big developments by abusing the approvals process.
green tape is generally designed to make it harder for people to gain environmental approvals by simply placing more hoops in front of them to jump through.. same end point, just a longer and more costly part to get there…
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:
I thought Greentape was a protest tactic to stop big developments by abusing the approvals process.
green tape is generally designed to make it harder for people to gain environmental approvals by simply placing more hoops in front of them to jump through.. same end point, just a longer and more costly part to get there…
and it’s probably worth noting that I don’t think that green tape is necessarily a bad thing, just that it increases the time and cost for project approvals – for the most part it’s a reflection of issues related to social license.
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
It would seem so.
buffy said:
kii said:
Have people forgotten morrisons days as immigration minister?
It would seem so.
ScoMo could do a movie trailer show on YouTube all Christian type movies
The executive director of Essential polling discusses explanations for the failure of pollsters in this election.
Worth reading.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/21/as-pollsters-we-are-rightly-in-the-firing-line-after-the-australian-election-what-happened?CMP=soc_567
dv said:
The executive director of Essential polling discusses explanations for the failure of pollsters in this election.Worth reading.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/21/as-pollsters-we-are-rightly-in-the-firing-line-after-the-australian-election-what-happened?CMP=soc_567
The polls have mostly always ended up incorrect.
diddly-squat said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:removal of green tape isn’t explicitly a proxy for “destruction on the countryside”
Can’t agree with that.
I doubt if he will push the others, or get anything through the senate, even if he does.
“green tape” generally refers to the level of bureaucracy associated with environmental and (more so now) social approvals. A change in the level of bureaucracy isn’t necessarily the same as a change in the standard of the environmental conditions that are imposed on a project.
It is so John Howard. “I’ll klet that go through to the keeper”. Meanwhile removing the funding and putting it into advertising campaign to bolster an argument on his agenda.
AwesomeO said:
I thought Greentape was a protest tactic to stop big developments by abusing the approvals process.
We could allude to red tape and go from there?
roughbarked said:
dv said:
The executive director of Essential polling discusses explanations for the failure of pollsters in this election.Worth reading.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/21/as-pollsters-we-are-rightly-in-the-firing-line-after-the-australian-election-what-happened?CMP=soc_567
The polls have mostly always ended up incorrect.
That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
The executive director of Essential polling discusses explanations for the failure of pollsters in this election.Worth reading.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/21/as-pollsters-we-are-rightly-in-the-firing-line-after-the-australian-election-what-happened?CMP=soc_567
The polls have mostly always ended up incorrect.
That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
So an election has never been won within cooee of a 1% swing?
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
The executive director of Essential polling discusses explanations for the failure of pollsters in this election.Worth reading.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/21/as-pollsters-we-are-rightly-in-the-firing-line-after-the-australian-election-what-happened?CMP=soc_567
The polls have mostly always ended up incorrect.
That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
Those Ruskie’s I tell you
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
The executive director of Essential polling discusses explanations for the failure of pollsters in this election.Worth reading.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/21/as-pollsters-we-are-rightly-in-the-firing-line-after-the-australian-election-what-happened?CMP=soc_567
The polls have mostly always ended up incorrect.
That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
I think the undecided in their samples was higher than usual.
I think they split them 50/50, that’s the weakness.
Cymek said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:The polls have mostly always ended up incorrect.
That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
Those Ruskie’s I tell you
They are only one of the attempting influencers. It is clear that what Clive said was, I” spent all thta money to make sure those Labor bastids didn’t het in”.
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
dv said:That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
Those Ruskie’s I tell you
They are only one of the attempting influencers. It is clear that what Clive said was, I” spent all thta money to make sure those Labor bastids didn’t het in”.
Put pecs on. geez! did I type that?
Anyway, Pauline is also there to stop the Labor vote in Queensland.
Rorting the system has been intrinsic since the rum corps.
roughbarked said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:The polls have mostly always ended up incorrect.
That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
So an election has never been won within cooee of a 1% swing?
Three things:
A) by swing you mean polling error
B) i said within 1%
C) I said since the 1980s, not “never”
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
So an election has never been won within cooee of a 1% swing?
Three things:
A) by swing you mean polling error
B) i said within 1%
C) I said since the 1980s, not “never”
Yeah well. the 1980’s was never my limit.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:The polls have mostly always ended up incorrect.
That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
I think the undecided in their samples was higher than usual.
I think they split them 50/50, that’s the weakness.
Yes.
Be interesting to see how the UaP and One Nation prefs split.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:That’s false. Polling in Australia has been very accurate since the 1980s, producing polling averages within 1% of the result. That’s why this polling miss (of 2.5%) has been so newsworthy.
I think the undecided in their samples was higher than usual.
I think they split them 50/50, that’s the weakness.
Yes.
Be interesting to see how the UaP and One Nation prefs split.
They won’t go Labor’s way.
RUSHES IN
Can I help?
But here’s the polling history. I’ll give the LNP number first in each case.
2016
Polls 50.9 — 49.1
Result 50.4 – 49.6
Miss = 0.5%
2013
Polls 53.9 – 46.1
Result 53.5 – 46.5
Miss = 0.4%
2010
Polls 49.9 – 50.1
Result 49.8 – 50.2
Miss = 0.1%
2007
Polls 48 – 52
Results 47.3 – 52.7
Miss = 0.7%
sibeen said:
RUSHES INCan I help?
Sadly…
dv said:
But here’s the polling history. I’ll give the LNP number first in each case.2016
Polls 50.9 — 49.1
Result 50.4 – 49.6
Miss = 0.5%2013
Polls 53.9 – 46.1
Result 53.5 – 46.5
Miss = 0.4%2010
Polls 49.9 – 50.1
Result 49.8 – 50.2
Miss = 0.1%2007
Polls 48 – 52
Results 47.3 – 52.7
Miss = 0.7%
Anyway, it is all still within a cooee that could be argued about with ales around a fire for ages.
2004
Polls 52 – 48
Results 52.7- 47.3
Miss = 0.7%
2001
Polls 53- 47
Results 51-49
Miss = 2%
1998
Polls 47-53
Result 49-51
Miss = 2%
1996
Polls 53.5 – 47.5
Result 53.6 – 47.4
Miss = 0.1%
1993
Polls 50.5 – 49.5
Result 48.6 – 51.4
Miss = 1.9%
Refreshingly candid
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/22/clive-palmer-says-he-decided-to-polarise-electorate-with-anti-labor-ads-to-ensure-coalition-win?CMP=soc_567
Clive Palmer says he ‘decided to polarise electorate’ with anti-Labor ads to ensure Coalition win
Mining magnate says he sacrificed winning seats in the election for his United Australia party to prioritise keeping out Bill Shorten
Clive Palmer says he “decided to polarise the electorate” with an anti-Labor advertising blitz in the final weeks of the election campaign, rather than attempting to win seats for his United Australia party.
Palmer told ABC radio in Queensland on Tuesday that two weeks before the election, the UAP conducted research that showed it would win four Senate seats and an 11% share of the national vote.
“But it also showed Bill Shorten would be elected prime minister,” Palmer said.
“We thought that would be a disaster for Australia so we decided to polarise the electorate “
Palmer cut a preference deal with the Coalition early in the campaign. He spent an estimated $60m on personal and UAP bright yellow advertising and ran candidates in every lower house seat. The party won no seats in parliament and 3.4% of the first-preference vote.
But Palmer said his shift to attacking Shorten and Labor immediately “improved the government’s position” and that they won a majority on the back of his preferences.
“Ninety per cent of those preferences flowed to the Liberal party and they’ve won by about 2% so our vote has got them across the line.”
dv said:
Refreshingly candid
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/22/clive-palmer-says-he-decided-to-polarise-electorate-with-anti-labor-ads-to-ensure-coalition-win?CMP=soc_567Clive Palmer says he ‘decided to polarise electorate’ with anti-Labor ads to ensure Coalition win
Mining magnate says he sacrificed winning seats in the election for his United Australia party to prioritise keeping out Bill Shorten
Clive Palmer says he “decided to polarise the electorate” with an anti-Labor advertising blitz in the final weeks of the election campaign, rather than attempting to win seats for his United Australia party.
Palmer told ABC radio in Queensland on Tuesday that two weeks before the election, the UAP conducted research that showed it would win four Senate seats and an 11% share of the national vote.
“But it also showed Bill Shorten would be elected prime minister,” Palmer said.
“We thought that would be a disaster for Australia so we decided to polarise the electorate “
Palmer cut a preference deal with the Coalition early in the campaign. He spent an estimated $60m on personal and UAP bright yellow advertising and ran candidates in every lower house seat. The party won no seats in parliament and 3.4% of the first-preference vote.
But Palmer said his shift to attacking Shorten and Labor immediately “improved the government’s position” and that they won a majority on the back of his preferences.
“Ninety per cent of those preferences flowed to the Liberal party and they’ve won by about 2% so our vote has got them across the line.”
Nasty piece of work, that one.
I noticed that palmer advertising used a lot of yellow. Later on I noticed labor was using a similar yellow in some ads. Was this a deliberate ploy to make people think the attack ads were associated with palmer? Or was it just a bad choice in colour?
dv said:
Refreshingly candid
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/22/clive-palmer-says-he-decided-to-polarise-electorate-with-anti-labor-ads-to-ensure-coalition-win?CMP=soc_567Clive Palmer says he ‘decided to polarise electorate’ with anti-Labor ads to ensure Coalition win
Mining magnate says he sacrificed winning seats in the election for his United Australia party to prioritise keeping out Bill Shorten
Clive Palmer says he “decided to polarise the electorate” with an anti-Labor advertising blitz in the final weeks of the election campaign, rather than attempting to win seats for his United Australia party.
Palmer told ABC radio in Queensland on Tuesday that two weeks before the election, the UAP conducted research that showed it would win four Senate seats and an 11% share of the national vote.
“But it also showed Bill Shorten would be elected prime minister,” Palmer said.
“We thought that would be a disaster for Australia so we decided to polarise the electorate “
Palmer cut a preference deal with the Coalition early in the campaign. He spent an estimated $60m on personal and UAP bright yellow advertising and ran candidates in every lower house seat. The party won no seats in parliament and 3.4% of the first-preference vote.
But Palmer said his shift to attacking Shorten and Labor immediately “improved the government’s position” and that they won a majority on the back of his preferences.
“Ninety per cent of those preferences flowed to the Liberal party and they’ve won by about 2% so our vote has got them across the line.”
Not so sure about candid…more like taking the glory after the fact…
HIGH-visibility independent Steve Mav says he is disappointed his campaign for the Senate did not win him more votes but has vowed he is not going away.
Mr Mav, a former Glenorchy councillor, ran a spirited ten-month campaign but was hampered by a poor ballot position among the ungrouped independent candidates below the line at the far right end of the ballot paper.
The latest Australian Electoral Commission results have Mr Mav receiving 2,398 primary votes — around one per cent of the total — well short of a quota.
Steve Mav. Picture: PATRICK GEE
Mr Mav was the highest-polling ungrouped Senate candidate in Australia, receiving about the same number of votes as high profile independent candidate Craig Garland and close to that achieved by the National Party in the Senate race in Tasmania.
“This is a setback,” he said. “My internal polling was not consistent with the result.
“I need to carefully study it and understand why my internal polling, which showed me in a winning position, was not reflected on election day.
“We have to wait for all the votes to come in, they haven’t come in yet.”
Mr Mav said he would take on the lessons of this election before deciding what his next move was. But he said he had no intention of giving up.
“In terms of the issues I ran, I make no apologies for being in favour of capital punishment. I make no apologies for wanting a federal takeover of the health system, I make no apologies for the fact that I have made my position very clear in terms of lower taxes.
“Watch this space because I’m going to be when I make my comeback I will be bigger bolder and I won’t disappear.
“The Mav haters out there who are just dreaming of me going away will be disappointed.”
https://www.themercury.com.au/news/tasmania/mav-vows-another-run-despite-disappointing-senate-result/news-story/a41c7ab651e34e13bc85966a49790855?fbclid=IwAR3NIlbSKBovBz0JaCzzI5vcBlhvBpXXErC58SCGyUFOX_q3rK0YtCP4ATI
Dr Kevin Bonham’s wrapup of the polling failure
http://kevinbonham.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-miracle-is-over-2019-australian.html?m=1
Nice 2PP. Shame it’s for the other side …
“I have always believed in miracles” said re-elected Prime Minister Scott Morrison very late on Saturday night. But many (not all) of us who study national Australian polls and use them to try to forecast elections have believed in a miracle for one election too many. The reason we believed in this miracle was that it kept delivering. While polls failed to forecast Brexit, Trump and two UK elections in a row (among other high profile failures) Australian national polls continued to churn out highly accurate final results. The two-party preferred results in final Newspolls from 2007 to 2016 are an example of this: 52 (result 52.7), 50.2 (result 50.1), 54 (result 53.5), 50.5 (result 50.4).
Predicting federal elections pretty accurately has long been as simple as aggregating the polls, adjusting for obvious house effects and personal votes, applying probability models (not just the simple pendulum) and off you go; you generally won’t be more than 5-6 seats wrong on the totals. While overseas observers like Nate Silver pour scorn on our little polling failure as a modest example of the genre and blast our media for failing to anticipate it, they do so apparently unfamiliar with just how good our national polling has been compared to polling overseas. As a predictor of final results, the aggregation of at least the final polls has survived the decline of landlines, volatile campaigns following leadership changes or major events, suspected preferencing shifts that frequently barely appeared, herding with the finish line in sight, and come up trumps many elections in a row. This has been put down to many things, not least that compulsory voting makes polling easier by removing the problem of trying to work out who will actually vote. But perhaps it was just lucky.
(Much more in link)
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
buffy said:
dv said:
Refreshingly candid
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/may/22/clive-palmer-says-he-decided-to-polarise-electorate-with-anti-labor-ads-to-ensure-coalition-win?CMP=soc_567Clive Palmer says he ‘decided to polarise electorate’ with anti-Labor ads to ensure Coalition win
Mining magnate says he sacrificed winning seats in the election for his United Australia party to prioritise keeping out Bill Shorten
Clive Palmer says he “decided to polarise the electorate” with an anti-Labor advertising blitz in the final weeks of the election campaign, rather than attempting to win seats for his United Australia party.
Palmer told ABC radio in Queensland on Tuesday that two weeks before the election, the UAP conducted research that showed it would win four Senate seats and an 11% share of the national vote.
“But it also showed Bill Shorten would be elected prime minister,” Palmer said.
“We thought that would be a disaster for Australia so we decided to polarise the electorate “
Palmer cut a preference deal with the Coalition early in the campaign. He spent an estimated $60m on personal and UAP bright yellow advertising and ran candidates in every lower house seat. The party won no seats in parliament and 3.4% of the first-preference vote.
But Palmer said his shift to attacking Shorten and Labor immediately “improved the government’s position” and that they won a majority on the back of his preferences.
“Ninety per cent of those preferences flowed to the Liberal party and they’ve won by about 2% so our vote has got them across the line.”
Not so sure about candid…more like taking the glory after the fact…
He did clearly state in his advertising, anti Labor sentiment.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
Why do you ask here? Surely this is a question to be put in letters to the editor of the SMH?
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
Cause all major polls got it wrong.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
Cause all major polls got it wrong.
Quite comprehensible because they were indeed looking in the wrong place.
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
Why do you ask here? Surely this is a question to be put in letters to the editor of the SMH?
One could ask the question anywhere, but yes letters to newspapers.
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
Cause all major polls got it wrong.
Quite comprehensible because they were indeed looking in the wrong place.
Yes.
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
Why do you ask here? Surely this is a question to be put in letters to the editor of the SMH?
One could ask the question anywhere, but yes letters to newspapers.
My point was that the people here already know the answer but probably won’t bother telling you.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
I have no idea.
Michael V said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
I have no idea.
there you go. ;)
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
What I think no longer matters. Clearly I have no idea about politics, or about Australia. I have decided to abandon social media, except for this place.
https://theconversation.com/queensland-to-all-those-quexiteers-dont-judge-try-to-understand-us-117502?fbclid=IwAR2zSzJVZrnxTOc2Ik8h03wNj7HNFildmPvDUBxnjCpzMaT0dvJpcS33LGw
—-
Queenslanders are misunderstood and it is labor’s fault because labor should be about Queensland because they had the tree but now Labor is about the suburbs.
sarahs mum said:
https://theconversation.com/queensland-to-all-those-quexiteers-dont-judge-try-to-understand-us-117502?fbclid=IwAR2zSzJVZrnxTOc2Ik8h03wNj7HNFildmPvDUBxnjCpzMaT0dvJpcS33LGw—-
Queenslanders are misunderstood and it is labor’s fault because labor should be about Queensland because they had the tree but now Labor is about the suburbs.
And Queensland is not about suburbs it is about regionals.
party_pants said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
What I think no longer matters. Clearly I have no idea about politics, or about Australia. I have decided to abandon social media, except for this place.
Happy family one hand clap
Four went down but none came back
King Crimson ~ Pete Sinfield lyrics.
“Happy family, one hand clap,”
“One hand clap” refers to the zen riddle (“What is the sound of one hand clapping?”) and alludes to the Beatles very public embrace of eastern religion. And what is the sound of one had clapping? Silence. The applause has died.
“Four went by and none came back.”
The break up of the Beatles and, perhaps, the differentiation of the four psychological functions. “ https://www.songsouponsea.com/Promenade/CirkusE.html
roughbarked said:
party_pants said:
Tau.Neutrino said:Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
What I think no longer matters. Clearly I have no idea about politics, or about Australia. I have decided to abandon social media, except for this place.
Happy family one hand clap
Four went down but none came backKing Crimson ~ Pete Sinfield lyrics.
“Happy family, one hand clap,”
“One hand clap” refers to the zen riddle (“What is the sound of one hand clapping?”) and alludes to the Beatles very public embrace of eastern religion. And what is the sound of one had clapping? Silence. The applause has died.
“Four went by and none came back.”
The break up of the Beatles and, perhaps, the differentiation of the four psychological functions. “ https://www.songsouponsea.com/Promenade/CirkusE.html
I’ve stopped giving a fuck. I can abandon this place too if you like.
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:
party_pants said:What I think no longer matters. Clearly I have no idea about politics, or about Australia. I have decided to abandon social media, except for this place.
Happy family one hand clap
Four went down but none came backKing Crimson ~ Pete Sinfield lyrics.
“Happy family, one hand clap,”
“One hand clap” refers to the zen riddle (“What is the sound of one hand clapping?”) and alludes to the Beatles very public embrace of eastern religion. And what is the sound of one had clapping? Silence. The applause has died.
“Four went by and none came back.”
The break up of the Beatles and, perhaps, the differentiation of the four psychological functions. “ https://www.songsouponsea.com/Promenade/CirkusE.html
I’ve stopped giving a fuck. I can abandon this place too if you like.
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:
party_pants said:What I think no longer matters. Clearly I have no idea about politics, or about Australia. I have decided to abandon social media, except for this place.
Happy family one hand clap
Four went down but none came backKing Crimson ~ Pete Sinfield lyrics.
“Happy family, one hand clap,”
“One hand clap” refers to the zen riddle (“What is the sound of one hand clapping?”) and alludes to the Beatles very public embrace of eastern religion. And what is the sound of one had clapping? Silence. The applause has died.
“Four went by and none came back.”
The break up of the Beatles and, perhaps, the differentiation of the four psychological functions. “ https://www.songsouponsea.com/Promenade/CirkusE.html
I’ve stopped giving a fuck. I can abandon this place too if you like.
Please don’t.
Michael V said:
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:Happy family one hand clap
Four went down but none came backKing Crimson ~ Pete Sinfield lyrics.
“Happy family, one hand clap,”
“One hand clap” refers to the zen riddle (“What is the sound of one hand clapping?”) and alludes to the Beatles very public embrace of eastern religion. And what is the sound of one had clapping? Silence. The applause has died.
“Four went by and none came back.”
The break up of the Beatles and, perhaps, the differentiation of the four psychological functions. “ https://www.songsouponsea.com/Promenade/CirkusE.html
I’ve stopped giving a fuck. I can abandon this place too if you like.
Please don’t.
+1. or as I have already pointed out.
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
party_pants said:I’ve stopped giving a fuck. I can abandon this place too if you like.
Please don’t.
+1. or as I have already pointed out.
I recall my mother on her death bed and I asked her about voting, Her reply was, “John Howard will get in again and my vote won’t count anyway”. I had to tell the electoral peopple that my mother was as they already knew, dead. So there was no way they were getting 20 bucks outta me.
party_pants said:
Tau.Neutrino said:Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
What I think no longer matters. Clearly I have no idea about politics, or about Australia. I have decided to abandon social media, except for this place.
There’s social media other than this place? I don’t know of anywhere more social.
Was it Jim Cairns who said “I used to think politics was about helping people”
So if you care about helping people, then you already know everything there is to know about politics.
mollwollfumble said:
party_pants said:
Tau.Neutrino said:Anyone think the polling failure was due to underestimating changing attitudes in social media?
What I think no longer matters. Clearly I have no idea about politics, or about Australia. I have decided to abandon social media, except for this place.
There’s social media other than this place? I don’t know of anywhere more social.
Was it Jim Cairns who said “I used to think politics was about helping people”
So if you care about helping people, then you already know everything there is to know about politics.
I smoked dope with Jim.
roughbarked said:
mollwollfumble said:
party_pants said:What I think no longer matters. Clearly I have no idea about politics, or about Australia. I have decided to abandon social media, except for this place.
There’s social media other than this place? I don’t know of anywhere more social.
Was it Jim Cairns who said “I used to think politics was about helping people”
So if you care about helping people, then you already know everything there is to know about politics.
I smoked dope with Jim.
and you all know how that went for him at the whole sacking of the government thing.
ALP’s hopes of a 2nd senator in this batch are fading. Increasingly it is looking like 3 LNP, 1 One Nation, 1 Green, 1 ALP. That’s a pretty shocking result.
dv said:
ALP’s hopes of a 2nd senator in this batch are fading. Increasingly it is looking like 3 LNP, 1 One Nation, 1 Green, 1 ALP. That’s a pretty shocking result.
That’s QLD I take it.
sibeen said:
dv said:
ALP’s hopes of a 2nd senator in this batch are fading. Increasingly it is looking like 3 LNP, 1 One Nation, 1 Green, 1 ALP. That’s a pretty shocking result.
That’s QLD I take it.
Sorry, yes
Is this fuckin’ election still going?
dv said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
ALP’s hopes of a 2nd senator in this batch are fading. Increasingly it is looking like 3 LNP, 1 One Nation, 1 Green, 1 ALP. That’s a pretty shocking result.
That’s QLD I take it.
Sorry, yes
Apologising is cathartic.
dv said:
ALP’s hopes of a 2nd senator in this batch are fading. Increasingly it is looking like 3 LNP, 1 One Nation, 1 Green, 1 ALP. That’s a pretty shocking result.
I’ll say. I didn’t vote for any of those.
PS, who’s replacing Bull Shit as head of Labor? And why?
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
ALP’s hopes of a 2nd senator in this batch are fading. Increasingly it is looking like 3 LNP, 1 One Nation, 1 Green, 1 ALP. That’s a pretty shocking result.
I’ll say. I didn’t vote for any of those.
PS, who’s replacing Bull Shit as head of Labor? And why?
You’ve never even heard of Tanya Plibersek so we’ll be sure to value your opinions on Australian politics.
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
ALP’s hopes of a 2nd senator in this batch are fading. Increasingly it is looking like 3 LNP, 1 One Nation, 1 Green, 1 ALP. That’s a pretty shocking result.
I’ll say. I didn’t vote for any of those.
PS, who’s replacing Bull Shit as head of Labor? And why?
You’ve never even heard of Tanya Plibersek so we’ll be sure to value your opinions on Australian politics.
That’s a ZING up there with BS’ best.
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
If she’d singled out the individual Queenslanders responsible, she’d be facing lawsuits.
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:I’ll say. I didn’t vote for any of those.
PS, who’s replacing Bull Shit as head of Labor? And why?
You’ve never even heard of Tanya Plibersek so we’ll be sure to value your opinions on Australian politics.
That’s a ZING up there with BS’ best.
Crushing
dv said:
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
ALP’s hopes of a 2nd senator in this batch are fading. Increasingly it is looking like 3 LNP, 1 One Nation, 1 Green, 1 ALP. That’s a pretty shocking result.
I’ll say. I didn’t vote for any of those.
PS, who’s replacing Bull Shit as head of Labor? And why?
You’ve never even heard of Tanya Plibersek so we’ll be sure to value your opinions on Australian politics.
Tanya Plibersek has taken a back seat on the leadership.
Anthony Albanese is likely to be next labor leader with Richard Marles as deputy
I hope Tanya gets a shadow position.
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
How are QLD stealing water?
Victorian MP Clare O’Neil drops out of race for Labor deputy leader, leaving Richard Marles
Labor’s new leadership team is set to be Anthony Albanese and Richard Marles after Victorian MP Clare O’Neil chose not to run for the deputy role.
sibeen said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
How are QLD stealing water?
sibeen said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
How are QLD stealing water?
We’re not and anyway you cant prove it.
sibeen said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
How are QLD stealing water?
In fact, we just gave water to Lake Eyre.
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
How are QLD stealing water?
In fact, we just gave water to Lake Eyre.
:)
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
How are QLD stealing water?
In fact, we just gave water to Lake Eyre.
Tamb said:
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:How are QLD stealing water?
In fact, we just gave water to Lake Eyre.
And what did the southerners do with it? Nothing. Just left it there to evaporate.
Bloody ingrates.
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
To be fair to the SHY young tweeter, talking as though everybody in an entire state/country/age group was the same and fitted some insulting stereotype is rife, and most of the time passes without comment.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
To be fair to the SHY young tweeter, talking as though everybody in an entire state/country/age group was the same and fitted some insulting stereotype is rife, and most of the time passes without comment.
I can partly understand her reasoning.
The state no longer has any industry thus does not need much 24/7 power. Renewables will suffice for their dwindling population.
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
To be fair to the SHY young tweeter, talking as though everybody in an entire state/country/age group was the same and fitted some insulting stereotype is rife, and most of the time passes without comment.
I can partly understand her reasoning.
The state no longer has any industry thus does not need much 24/7 power. Renewables will suffice for their dwindling population.
I see it the opposite way.
Where you have industry needing continuous power you have a source of funding to provide power storage.
If there is little or no heavy industry you still need reliable sources of energy to meet peak demands, but the cost of providing the necessary storage has to be met by individuals and companies with lesser resources.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:To be fair to the SHY young tweeter, talking as though everybody in an entire state/country/age group was the same and fitted some insulting stereotype is rife, and most of the time passes without comment.
I can partly understand her reasoning.
The state no longer has any industry thus does not need much 24/7 power. Renewables will suffice for their dwindling population.
I see it the opposite way.
Where you have industry needing continuous power you have a source of funding to provide power storage.
If there is little or no heavy industry you still need reliable sources of energy to meet peak demands, but the cost of providing the necessary storage has to be met by individuals and companies with lesser resources.
Or technological advances get made that can move the grid from a reliance on high inertia supplies to low inertia supplies that can vary their input/output at speeds that couldn’t be realised until very recently :)
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
To be fair to the SHY young tweeter, talking as though everybody in an entire state/country/age group was the same and fitted some insulting stereotype is rife, and most of the time passes without comment.
She’s a senator in federal parliament in a party whose fate is tied to popular perception. She’s not some rando passing idle comments at the pub.
Divine Angel said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
How are QLD stealing water?
In fact, we just gave water to Lake Eyre.
What can you say except you’re welcome
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-26/election-2019-scott-morrison-unveils-government-ministry/11150626
There’s a Guardian article about why rural voters swung against the ALP. There’s a bit of a conversation happening on Facebook.
There are folks making the case “you all think everyone in the Bush is gullible but we were worried about Labor’s big new Death Tax.”
Can’t make this shit up.
dv said:
There’s a Guardian article about why rural voters swung against the ALP. There’s a bit of a conversation happening on Facebook.There are folks making the case “you all think everyone in the Bush is gullible but we were worried about Labor’s big new Death Tax.”
Can’t make this shit up.
Guardian readers seem to have lost the plot a bit, a tiny swing and they are abusing everyone as red necks and nazis or just plain stupid and chanting Murdoch or MSM.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
There’s a Guardian article about why rural voters swung against the ALP. There’s a bit of a conversation happening on Facebook.There are folks making the case “you all think everyone in the Bush is gullible but we were worried about Labor’s big new Death Tax.”
Can’t make this shit up.
Guardian readers seem to have lost the plot a bit, a tiny swing and they are abusing everyone as red necks and nazis or just plain stupid and chanting Murdoch or MSM.
I haven’t noticed any difference :)
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
I’m generally well disposed towards The Greens and SHY, but jeeeeeesus this a moronic tweet. The Greens wnjoyed a nice swing in Qld, elected a Senator which doesn’t happen every election. Insulting an entire state doesn’t help.
To be fair to the SHY young tweeter, talking as though everybody in an entire state/country/age group was the same and fitted some insulting stereotype is rife, and most of the time passes without comment.
She’s a senator in federal parliament in a party whose fate is tied to popular perception. She’s not some rando passing idle comments at the pub.
OK, but all the other federal politicians do the gross generalisation stuff as well.
Well, maybe that’s a bit of a gross generalisation, I haven’t actually listened to all of them, but quite a few do.
Michael V said:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-26/election-2019-scott-morrison-unveils-government-ministry/11150626
Scot Morrison Ministries.
Michael V said:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-26/election-2019-scott-morrison-unveils-government-ministry/11150626
Fair play to Morrison.
He has not stacked the cabinet with rightwingers. And there are 7 women in cabinet which is probably a record. Ken Wyatt will be the first indigenous Indigenous Affairs minister.
What’s the prime minister stepping down for?
mollwollfumble said:
What’s the prime minister stepping down for?
His Swiss bank account has reached his retirement target.
dv said:
Well that’s awkward.
dv said:
LOL.
With Barnaby it’s all about man management, he’s not too bright but he’s very popular in his electorate, you don’t want him to turn rogue when you only have a two seat majority.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/alt-right-facebook-memes-pushed-anti-labor-message-20190522-p51pvy.html
Witty Rejoinder said:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/alt-right-facebook-memes-pushed-anti-labor-message-20190522-p51pvy.html
Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/alt-right-facebook-memes-pushed-anti-labor-message-20190522-p51pvy.html
Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
Touch a nerve did I? :-P
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/alt-right-facebook-memes-pushed-anti-labor-message-20190522-p51pvy.html
Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
Touch a nerve did I? :-P
I voted left, I’m just aware that they can also be conniving cunts.
I loved it on election night; Penny Wong tried some shit on, Leigh Sales just rolled her eyes and mentioned mediscare, Penny pulled her head in.
Hello,
We need money
Our page www.masterstl.ru and www.instagram.com/masterstl
…
This is a novel concept for a spam email
Oppps Fred Wong.
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/alt-right-facebook-memes-pushed-anti-labor-message-20190522-p51pvy.html
Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
Thanks for that. I was going to ask if that was the case.
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/alt-right-facebook-memes-pushed-anti-labor-message-20190522-p51pvy.html
Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
OK, as I live under a rock – I never saw any Clive Palmer ads except a small poster on a fence down our street – I have been trying to remember what the Mediscare stuff really was. I always had in the back of my mind that it was a privatization of payments which had been under consideration by the government of the time because everything is always done better by private enterprise (Yes, that’s a bit biassed..). I don’t really know who this Australian Independent Media Network is, so I haven’t got a good grip on whether this is true or not, but it seems to fit with my vague ideas of what went on.
https://theaimn.com/was-mediscare-really-a-lie/
So not a total made up thing like the death taxes thing, but an exaggeration of something that actually was under consideration?
I didn’t know about the death taxes thing during the campaign either. I must read very selectively.
buffy said:
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/alt-right-facebook-memes-pushed-anti-labor-message-20190522-p51pvy.html
Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
OK, as I live under a rock – I never saw any Clive Palmer ads except a small poster on a fence down our street – I have been trying to remember what the Mediscare stuff really was. I always had in the back of my mind that it was a privatization of payments which had been under consideration by the government of the time because everything is always done better by private enterprise (Yes, that’s a bit biassed..). I don’t really know who this Australian Independent Media Network is, so I haven’t got a good grip on whether this is true or not, but it seems to fit with my vague ideas of what went on.
https://theaimn.com/was-mediscare-really-a-lie/
So not a total made up thing like the death taxes thing, but an exaggeration of something that actually was under consideration?
I didn’t know about the death taxes thing during the campaign either. I must read very selectively.
you know how the right here operate…it’s always….but labor started it. They need a new record, or to shoot that parrot that is teaching them their lines.
ChrispenEvan said:
…or to shoot that parrot that is teaching them their lines.
You mean this one?

captain_spalding said:
ChrispenEvan said:…or to shoot that parrot that is teaching them their lines.You mean this one?
that is just one. there’s a flock of em.
I seem to remember having some interest because I see Veterans and still bulk bill some people. So it would have affected us if the payment system was privatized.
buffy said:
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/alt-right-facebook-memes-pushed-anti-labor-message-20190522-p51pvy.html
Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
OK, as I live under a rock – I never saw any Clive Palmer ads except a small poster on a fence down our street – I have been trying to remember what the Mediscare stuff really was. I always had in the back of my mind that it was a privatization of payments which had been under consideration by the government of the time because everything is always done better by private enterprise (Yes, that’s a bit biassed..). I don’t really know who this Australian Independent Media Network is, so I haven’t got a good grip on whether this is true or not, but it seems to fit with my vague ideas of what went on.
https://theaimn.com/was-mediscare-really-a-lie/
So not a total made up thing like the death taxes thing, but an exaggeration of something that actually was under consideration?
I didn’t know about the death taxes thing during the campaign either. I must read very selectively.
Holy shit, every awcond Youtube video I saw had a ten second UAP ad, couldn’t go half an hour watching TV without hearing “Aussies not going to take it”, there are STILL six huge UAP billboards within 2 km of my home I’ve never seen a saturation campaign like it.
dv said:
buffy said:
sibeen said:Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
OK, as I live under a rock – I never saw any Clive Palmer ads except a small poster on a fence down our street – I have been trying to remember what the Mediscare stuff really was. I always had in the back of my mind that it was a privatization of payments which had been under consideration by the government of the time because everything is always done better by private enterprise (Yes, that’s a bit biassed..). I don’t really know who this Australian Independent Media Network is, so I haven’t got a good grip on whether this is true or not, but it seems to fit with my vague ideas of what went on.
https://theaimn.com/was-mediscare-really-a-lie/
So not a total made up thing like the death taxes thing, but an exaggeration of something that actually was under consideration?
I didn’t know about the death taxes thing during the campaign either. I must read very selectively.
Holy shit, every awcond Youtube video I saw had a ten second UAP ad, couldn’t go half an hour watching TV without hearing “Aussies not going to take it”, there are STILL six huge UAP billboards within 2 km of my home I’ve never seen a saturation campaign like it.
Me neither. It scared me. And on reflection the fear was justified.
dv said:
buffy said:
sibeen said:Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
OK, as I live under a rock – I never saw any Clive Palmer ads except a small poster on a fence down our street – I have been trying to remember what the Mediscare stuff really was. I always had in the back of my mind that it was a privatization of payments which had been under consideration by the government of the time because everything is always done better by private enterprise (Yes, that’s a bit biassed..). I don’t really know who this Australian Independent Media Network is, so I haven’t got a good grip on whether this is true or not, but it seems to fit with my vague ideas of what went on.
https://theaimn.com/was-mediscare-really-a-lie/
So not a total made up thing like the death taxes thing, but an exaggeration of something that actually was under consideration?
I didn’t know about the death taxes thing during the campaign either. I must read very selectively.
Holy shit, every awcond Youtube video I saw had a ten second UAP ad, couldn’t go half an hour watching TV without hearing “Aussies not going to take it”, there are STILL six huge UAP billboards within 2 km of my home I’ve never seen a saturation campaign like it.
yeah, but Labor!
dv said:
buffy said:
sibeen said:Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
OK, as I live under a rock – I never saw any Clive Palmer ads except a small poster on a fence down our street – I have been trying to remember what the Mediscare stuff really was. I always had in the back of my mind that it was a privatization of payments which had been under consideration by the government of the time because everything is always done better by private enterprise (Yes, that’s a bit biassed..). I don’t really know who this Australian Independent Media Network is, so I haven’t got a good grip on whether this is true or not, but it seems to fit with my vague ideas of what went on.
https://theaimn.com/was-mediscare-really-a-lie/
So not a total made up thing like the death taxes thing, but an exaggeration of something that actually was under consideration?
I didn’t know about the death taxes thing during the campaign either. I must read very selectively.
Holy shit, every awcond Youtube video I saw had a ten second UAP ad, couldn’t go half an hour watching TV without hearing “Aussies not going to take it”, there are STILL six huge UAP billboards within 2 km of my home I’ve never seen a saturation campaign like it.
Apart from when I had the radio on, I hardly saw a Clive Palmer ad at all.
dv said:
buffy said:
sibeen said:Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
OK, as I live under a rock – I never saw any Clive Palmer ads except a small poster on a fence down our street – I have been trying to remember what the Mediscare stuff really was. I always had in the back of my mind that it was a privatization of payments which had been under consideration by the government of the time because everything is always done better by private enterprise (Yes, that’s a bit biassed..). I don’t really know who this Australian Independent Media Network is, so I haven’t got a good grip on whether this is true or not, but it seems to fit with my vague ideas of what went on.
https://theaimn.com/was-mediscare-really-a-lie/
So not a total made up thing like the death taxes thing, but an exaggeration of something that actually was under consideration?
I didn’t know about the death taxes thing during the campaign either. I must read very selectively.
Holy shit, every awcond Youtube video I saw had a ten second UAP ad, couldn’t go half an hour watching TV without hearing “Aussies not going to take it”, there are STILL six huge UAP billboards within 2 km of my home I’ve never seen a saturation campaign like it.
Funnily enough, I didn’t get any Clive stuff on youtube (not that I noticed anyway).
But I did see the double page spread ad in the SMH every day in the week before the election. Identical ad every day.
Maybe he didn’t bother in Victoria because everyone knows that all Victorians are greeny lefties.
captain_spalding said:
ChrispenEvan said:…or to shoot that parrot that is teaching them their lines.You mean this one?
Some one will egghead him, I hope its a really rotten one.
Tau.Neutrino said:
captain_spalding said:
ChrispenEvan said:…or to shoot that parrot that is teaching them their lines.You mean this one?
Some one will egghead him, I hope its a really rotten one.
I do not condone the use of violence.
Egghead him peacefully.
party_pants said:
dv said:
buffy said:OK, as I live under a rock – I never saw any Clive Palmer ads except a small poster on a fence down our street – I have been trying to remember what the Mediscare stuff really was. I always had in the back of my mind that it was a privatization of payments which had been under consideration by the government of the time because everything is always done better by private enterprise (Yes, that’s a bit biassed..). I don’t really know who this Australian Independent Media Network is, so I haven’t got a good grip on whether this is true or not, but it seems to fit with my vague ideas of what went on.
https://theaimn.com/was-mediscare-really-a-lie/
So not a total made up thing like the death taxes thing, but an exaggeration of something that actually was under consideration?
I didn’t know about the death taxes thing during the campaign either. I must read very selectively.
Holy shit, every awcond Youtube video I saw had a ten second UAP ad, couldn’t go half an hour watching TV without hearing “Aussies not going to take it”, there are STILL six huge UAP billboards within 2 km of my home I’ve never seen a saturation campaign like it.
Apart from when I had the radio on, I hardly saw a Clive Palmer ad at all.
Thank you p_p. So, it was in the SMH, which I don’t read, the Herald Sun, which Mr buffy reads and I don’t, and ads with YouTube, which I only go to for specific things like what is linked here in the forum. I don’t listen to commercial radio and as everyone knows, I pretty much watch ABC and SBS. Murdoch Mysteries and Frankie Drake are, I admit, on commercial, but generally recorded and adskipped. Perhaps this explains my naievete.
buffy said:
party_pants said:
dv said:Holy shit, every awcond Youtube video I saw had a ten second UAP ad, couldn’t go half an hour watching TV without hearing “Aussies not going to take it”, there are STILL six huge UAP billboards within 2 km of my home I’ve never seen a saturation campaign like it.
Apart from when I had the radio on, I hardly saw a Clive Palmer ad at all.
Thank you p_p. So, it was in the SMH, which I don’t read, the Herald Sun, which Mr buffy reads and I don’t, and ads with YouTube, which I only go to for specific things like what is linked here in the forum. I don’t listen to commercial radio and as everyone knows, I pretty much watch ABC and SBS. Murdoch Mysteries and Frankie Drake are, I admit, on commercial, but generally recorded and adskipped. Perhaps this explains my naievete.
I never saw any Clive Palmer ads either.
dv said:
buffy said:
sibeen said:Luckily all on the left are as pure as the driven snow and would never resort to gutter tactics.
OK, as I live under a rock – I never saw any Clive Palmer ads except a small poster on a fence down our street – I have been trying to remember what the Mediscare stuff really was. I always had in the back of my mind that it was a privatization of payments which had been under consideration by the government of the time because everything is always done better by private enterprise (Yes, that’s a bit biassed..). I don’t really know who this Australian Independent Media Network is, so I haven’t got a good grip on whether this is true or not, but it seems to fit with my vague ideas of what went on.
https://theaimn.com/was-mediscare-really-a-lie/
So not a total made up thing like the death taxes thing, but an exaggeration of something that actually was under consideration?
I didn’t know about the death taxes thing during the campaign either. I must read very selectively.
Holy shit, every awcond Youtube video I saw had a ten second UAP ad, couldn’t go half an hour watching TV without hearing “Aussies not going to take it”, there are STILL six huge UAP billboards within 2 km of my home I’ve never seen a saturation campaign like it.
You’ve never heard of ad block + ?
FERN Tree loves Andrew Wilkie, Risdon Vale loves Julie Collins and there are no Greens or National Party voters in Savage River.
A Mercury analysis of last week’s federal election result has revealed at which of the more than 320 polling places booths around Tasmania each major party did best — and where they did worst.
Independent MP for Clark, Mr Wilkie, was by far the most successful independent candidate to stand in Tasmania in the 2019 federal election.
And Fern Tree was the most one-sided booth in the poll too. Six out of 10 voters there cast their first preference vote for Mr Wilkie.
His vote in Cascades, South Hobart and Taroona were all above 54 per cent. Even his least successful booth at this election, Goodwood, scored him 41.8 per cent of the vote.
In Franklin, Labor’s Julie Collins performed best on the eastern side of the Derwent with 59 per cent of the first preference votes in Ridson Vale and 56 per cent in Clarendon Vale and Rokeby.
.
Labor’s Lyons MP Brian Mitchell was at his most popular in Primrose Sands, Gagebrook and New Norfolk.
Labor’s worst polling places statewide were in Clark, where candidate Ben Clark received just 9.15 per cent of the vote at Sandy Bay Beach. Three of the party’s six worst booths statewide were in the suburb.
Unsurprisingly, the Liberals performed best in Bass and Braddon, seats snatched from Labor. Bridget Archer enjoyed support of nearly 60 per cent of voters in Bridport and Gavin Pearce recorded 57 per cent support in Forest.
But Andrew Wilkie’s strong support saw the party vote in single figures in percentage terms at Fern Tree and Cascades.
The Greens’ Kit Darko was by far the party’s most successful candidate: recording 33 per cent of the vote among Franklin voters who cast their ballots in the Hobart City polling place.
Woodbridge, Cygnet and Kettering are the state’s Greenest booths: with 33.5 per cent, 32,2 per cent and 28.3 per cent of the vote respectively.
Savage River booth was the party’s worst — where no votes were cast in favour of the Greens.
All of the party’s worst polling places were in Braddon: Savage River, Irishtown and Sassafras yielded just them seven votes out of a possible 698.
The Nationals benefited most from the controversy involving Liberal candidate Jessica Whelan in Lyons. Their candidate Deanna Hutchinson recorded more than a quarter of the vote in 11 booths from Tunnack to Carrick.
But the party’s Braddon candidate Sally Milbourne suffered its three worst booths: recording no votes at all in Savage River, Tullah and Waratah.
The voters of Braddon recorded the five highest informal voting booths in the state.
In Savage River, the informal vote was 16.7 per cent, in Natone 14 per cent, at Edith Creek it was 12.9 per cent and 11.9 per cent at Tullah.
At the other end of the spectrum, none of the 522 voters at Fern Tree cast an informal ballot, nor any of the 31 who cast prepoll ballots in Franklin.
https://www.themercury.com.au/news/politics/federal-election-2019-where-candidates-performed-best-and-worst/news-story/c148f56266ac2547062669c4d1608865?fbclid=IwAR2D3TztErZgCPX5iVpOGplC8b2gX2-Wi-Yl1ongZG6MBTCesoJQMMeDDns
I am next door to the state’s greenest booths.
Some of the coverage about the demographic results has been misleading.
Analysed on a booth by booth basis or on a division
basis, most of the poorer areas swung towards the Coalition, and a surprising number of wealthier areas swung towards the ALP (not most, though).
Some articles have presented this as though the ALP is now the party of the upper middle class etc.
Overwhelmingly, poorer areas voted ALP and wealthier areas voted Liberal.
The swings aren’t the status. They just represent the shift from the previous election. E.g. poorer area booths that went 70% to ALP in 2016 went 68% to ALP this year.
LOL, the LNP coming for your super
https://www.afr.com/news/policy/tax/retirement-incomes-face-review-20190524-p51qsi
With 90% of the vote counted, the LNP is 40 votes ahead in Macquarie. Could go to a recount.
There is some talk that the Libs will place Warren Mundine in the Senate to replace Sinodinos, who is going to be ambassador to the USA.
If this occurs there will be a record 5 Indigenous Australians in parliament.
dv said:
With 90% of the vote counted, the LNP is 40 votes ahead in Macquarie. Could go to a recount.There is some talk that the Libs will place Warren Mundine in the Senate to replace Sinodinos, who is going to be ambassador to the USA.
If this occurs there will be a record 5 Indigenous Australians in parliament.
Dunno about “could”. I would think certainly “should”.
Only just occurred to me.
Morrison is our first Generation X prime minister.
He’s one of us.
Kurt Cobain would be so proud.
dv said:
A denial, a denial, a denial, a denial, a denial. A denial, a denial, a denial, a denial …
Only just occurred to me.Morrison is our first Generation X prime minister.
He’s one of us.
Kurt Cobain would be so proud.
Cymek said:
dv said:A denial, a denial, a denial, a denial, a denial. A denial, a denial, a denial, a denial …
Only just occurred to me.Morrison is our first Generation X prime minister.
He’s one of us.
Kurt Cobain would be so proud.
Light my candles, in a daze now I’ve found God
dv said:
Only just occurred to me.Morrison is our first Generation X prime minister.
He’s one of us.
Kurt Cobain would be so proud.
What’s this “us” stuff? I’ll set transition on you if you are not careful.
I didn’t realise that Julia was a Boomer, but it seems you are right (although who makes up the limits for the so-called generations, I don’t know).
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of knees
Absolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Ooops.
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Ooops.
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Do you have health insurance?
At least the parking fees will be covered if you do.
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Ouch, not even if the GP says please bulk bill
Cymek said:
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Ouch, not even if the GP says please bulk bill
Nup. Have a knee injury when you’re over 50 you pay.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Only just occurred to me.Morrison is our first Generation X prime minister.
He’s one of us.
Kurt Cobain would be so proud.
What’s this “us” stuff? I’ll set transition on you if you are not careful.
I didn’t realise that Julia was a Boomer, but it seems you are right (although who makes up the limits for the so-called generations, I don’t know).
Although according to TATE the limits for Gen-X are fuzzier than they are for Gen-BB, so it seems that Julia can be a Gen-X if she wants.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Only just occurred to me.Morrison is our first Generation X prime minister.
He’s one of us.
Kurt Cobain would be so proud.
What’s this “us” stuff? I’ll set transition on you if you are not careful.
I didn’t realise that Julia was a Boomer, but it seems you are right (although who makes up the limits for the so-called generations, I don’t know).
“Us” meaning Morrison, me, and other Xers. Scott is not much older than me.
It’s a bit arbitrary, but on the other hand there is a BIG gap between Morrison (1968) and Gillard (1961).
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Both parties are exactly the same
dv said:
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Both parties are exactly the same
I posted in the wrong thread :)
The Rev Dodgson said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Only just occurred to me.Morrison is our first Generation X prime minister.
He’s one of us.
Kurt Cobain would be so proud.
What’s this “us” stuff? I’ll set transition on you if you are not careful.
I didn’t realise that Julia was a Boomer, but it seems you are right (although who makes up the limits for the so-called generations, I don’t know).
Although according to TATE the limits for Gen-X are fuzzier than they are for Gen-BB, so it seems that Julia can be a Gen-X if she wants.
If she can tell us at least two Nirvana songs she is allowed
Cymek said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
The Rev Dodgson said:What’s this “us” stuff? I’ll set transition on you if you are not careful.
I didn’t realise that Julia was a Boomer, but it seems you are right (although who makes up the limits for the so-called generations, I don’t know).
Although according to TATE the limits for Gen-X are fuzzier than they are for Gen-BB, so it seems that Julia can be a Gen-X if she wants.
If she can tell us at least two Nirvana songs she is allowed
But what if you thought “Smells Like Teen Spirit” was a really average song?
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
The fuck do you get these done? I’ve had both knees, cost $500…
dv said:
It’s a bit arbitrary, but on the other hand there is a BIG gap between Morrison (1968) and Gillard (1961).
… and not just in age.
sibeen said:
Cymek said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Although according to TATE the limits for Gen-X are fuzzier than they are for Gen-BB, so it seems that Julia can be a Gen-X if she wants.
If she can tell us at least two Nirvana songs she is allowed
But what if you thought “Smells Like Teen Spirit” was a really average song?
That’s fair I don’t think Kurt liked it that much himself
poikilotherm said:
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
The fuck do you get these done? I’ve had both knees, cost $500…
Could you claim its a religious related work place injury from all the kneeling and praying
Cymek said:
poikilotherm said:
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
The fuck do you get these done? I’ve had both knees, cost $500…
Could you claim its a religious related work place injury from all the kneeling and praying
Blowing the clergy…possibly.
Cymek said:
sibeen said:
Cymek said:If she can tell us at least two Nirvana songs she is allowed
But what if you thought “Smells Like Teen Spirit” was a really average song?
That’s fair I don’t think Kurt liked it that much himself
Man who saved the world, live and heart/shaped box for me.
How good is Gen X.
Peak Warming Man said:
How good is Gen X.
Radically gnarly dude
Peak Warming Man said:
How good is Gen X.
The slacker gen?
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Both parties are exactly the same
I posted in the wrong thread :)
You sure?
Peak Warming Man said:
How good is Gen X.
The goodness of members of Gen X varies over a wide range.
dv said:
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Both parties are exactly the same
Clear policy differences, nazis want $1200 to drill, sunlit uplands want $1200 to fill.
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Both parties are exactly the same
I posted in the wrong thread :)
So get referred to orthopod, they request MRI and it’s claimable?
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
People aged 50 and older will no longer receive a rebate for GP-requested MRI scans of kneesAbsolute bastards. I have to get both knees done on Thursday. Will cost somewhere between $1200 and $1400, the utter shits.
Both parties are exactly the same
Clear policy differences, nazis want $1200 to drill, sunlit uplands want $1200 to fill.
Nazis?
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Both parties are exactly the same
Clear policy differences, nazis want $1200 to drill, sunlit uplands want $1200 to fill.
Nazis?
LNP.
I wonder who the first Millennial PM will be. Probably Chris Crewther if he makes a come back.
Even though his name sounds like Mike Tyson saying cruiser
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
AwesomeO said:Clear policy differences, nazis want $1200 to drill, sunlit uplands want $1200 to fill.
Nazis?
LNP.
Seems harsh
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Nazis?
LNP.
Seems harsh
Possibly “sunlit uplands” is a little extreme as well though.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
AwesomeO said:LNP.
Seems harsh
Possibly “sunlit uplands” is a little extreme as well though.
Probably Centre-right and Centre-left remain reasonable descriptions
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:Seems harsh
Possibly “sunlit uplands” is a little extreme as well though.
Probably Centre-right and Centre-left remain reasonable descriptions
Why after literally years is the forum suddenly coy on calling libs nazis? I reckon I know but interested in others.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Possibly “sunlit uplands” is a little extreme as well though.
Probably Centre-right and Centre-left remain reasonable descriptions
Why after literally years is the forum suddenly coy on calling libs nazis? I reckon I know but interested in others.
Has anyone on this forum ever called the Liberals Nazis?
Please provide an example.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Possibly “sunlit uplands” is a little extreme as well though.
Probably Centre-right and Centre-left remain reasonable descriptions
Why after literally years is the forum suddenly coy on calling libs nazis? I reckon I know but interested in others.
Because there are others further in that direction? All things are relative.
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Probably Centre-right and Centre-left remain reasonable descriptions
Why after literally years is the forum suddenly coy on calling libs nazis? I reckon I know but interested in others.
Has anyone on this forum ever called the Liberals Nazis?
Please provide an example.
Please provide a decent search facility.
buffy said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Probably Centre-right and Centre-left remain reasonable descriptions
Why after literally years is the forum suddenly coy on calling libs nazis? I reckon I know but interested in others.
Because there are others further in that direction? All things are relative.
I’n‘t think there’s any prominent politician in Australia you could call a Nazi. I think that Anning is a white supremacist, and probably Dutton is too. Obv there are some racist elements in One Nation. But that’s different from being a Nazi.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
AwesomeO said:Why after literally years is the forum suddenly coy on calling libs nazis? I reckon I know but interested in others.
Has anyone on this forum ever called the Liberals Nazis?
Please provide an example.
Please provide a decent search facility.
You could Go Ogle it.
But basically my point is that it hasn’t happened. Folks here are generally restrained.
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Has anyone on this forum ever called the Liberals Nazis?
Please provide an example.
Please provide a decent search facility.
You could Go Ogle it.
But basically my point is that it hasn’t happened. Folks here are generally restrained.
Plus a lot is, i would say, pure tongue in cheek and not to be taken seriously. Except by those who love riding the outrage bus.
dv said:
buffy said:
AwesomeO said:Why after literally years is the forum suddenly coy on calling libs nazis? I reckon I know but interested in others.
Because there are others further in that direction? All things are relative.
I’n‘t think there’s any prominent politician in Australia you could call a Nazi. I think that Anning is a white supremacist, and probably Dutton is too. Obv there are some racist elements in One Nation. But that’s different from being a Nazi.
True
Liberals policies come across as white supremacist as they value the rich white folk and everyone else is someone to step on
Anyone on the forum drunk Chartreuse ?
What’s it like
Cymek said:
dv said:
buffy said:Because there are others further in that direction? All things are relative.
I’n‘t think there’s any prominent politician in Australia you could call a Nazi. I think that Anning is a white supremacist, and probably Dutton is too. Obv there are some racist elements in One Nation. But that’s different from being a Nazi.
True
Liberals policies come across as white supremacist as they value the rich white folk and everyone else is someone to step on
In general, I disagree. I think Dutton is the odd man out. I’m not basing it on policy: I’m basing it on statements he’s made that are not Liberal party policy, and also things that he tends to share on social media. There’s a suspicious overlap between his talking points and those of the far right.
Well bugger me, I was going to do a nazi joke and wanted to find the name of a song from Cabaret.

Peak Warming Man said:
Well bugger me, I was going to do a nazi joke and wanted to find the name of a song from Cabaret.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Mg6Gfh9Co&bpctr=1559015533
just click “i wish to proceed” and away you go.
Peak Warming Man said:
Well bugger me, I was going to do a nazi joke and wanted to find the name of a song from Cabaret.
I know nothing of this song.
But apparently The Internet does:
https://www.counter-currents.com/2011/11/tomorrow-belongs-to-me/
The Rev Dodgson said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Well bugger me, I was going to do a nazi joke and wanted to find the name of a song from Cabaret.
I know nothing of this song.
But apparently The Internet does:
https://www.counter-currents.com/2011/11/tomorrow-belongs-to-me/
Alex Harvey did a version without, and well before, the nasties purloined it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKVvmfasK7E
ChrispenEvan said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Well bugger me, I was going to do a nazi joke and wanted to find the name of a song from Cabaret.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Mg6Gfh9Co&bpctr=1559015533
just click “i wish to proceed” and away you go.
This is nuts, FMD it’s the thin edge of the wedge, this song never had a warning on it before.
They’ll have warnings on everything soon because just about everything offends someone somewhere.
The Sound of Music sound track will be next.
Peak Warming Man said:
Well bugger me, I was going to do a nazi joke and wanted to find the name of a song from Cabaret.
Peak Warming Man said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Well bugger me, I was going to do a nazi joke and wanted to find the name of a song from Cabaret.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Mg6Gfh9Co&bpctr=1559015533
just click “i wish to proceed” and away you go.
This is nuts, FMD it’s the thin edge of the wedge, this song never had a warning on it before.
They’ll have warnings on everything soon because just about everything offends someone somewhere.
The Sound of Music sound track will be next.
Seems like it is going that way
Peak Warming Man said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Well bugger me, I was going to do a nazi joke and wanted to find the name of a song from Cabaret.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Mg6Gfh9Co&bpctr=1559015533
just click “i wish to proceed” and away you go.
This is nuts, FMD it’s the thin edge of the wedge, this song never had a warning on it before.
They’ll have warnings on everything soon because just about everything offends someone somewhere.
The Sound of Music sound track will be next.
And then, Springtime for Hitler
Cymek said:
Peak Warming Man said:
ChrispenEvan said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Mg6Gfh9Co&bpctr=1559015533
just click “i wish to proceed” and away you go.
This is nuts, FMD it’s the thin edge of the wedge, this song never had a warning on it before.
They’ll have warnings on everything soon because just about everything offends someone somewhere.
The Sound of Music sound track will be next.
Seems like it is going that way
Quite frankly “how do you solve a problem like Maria” is offensive. There is no problem, you just keep being you, boo.
I don’t get any warning when I look at Tomorrow Belongs To Me on YouTube but perhaps they figure I am already lost to sin.
https://youtu.be/FN7r0Rr1Qyc
Lab has hit the front in Macquarie.
Peak Warming Man said:
Lab has hit the front in Macquarie.
News From The Front!
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Lab has hit the front in Macquarie.
News From The Front!
I think when all the count is done and dusted and it’s a tie they literally do toss a coin.
Peak Warming Man said:
Lab has hit the front in Macquarie.
Fuck the Lab!
Around 1.5 million people who were registered to vote did not cast a vote.
https://www.theage.com.au/federal-election-2019/voter-turnout-at-record-low-after-young-people-disengage-20190530-p51sol.html
and to think the other day they were going on about how there had been so many new registrants
SCIENCE said:
and to think the other day they were going on about how there had been so many new registrants
And how Labor and the Greens were going to pick most of them up. However, they did register, but did not vote for anyone. Think that had everyone proved wrong. I blame it all on Global Warming!
probably died from the heat
dv said:
Around 1.5 million people who were registered to vote did not cast a vote.
https://www.theage.com.au/federal-election-2019/voter-turnout-at-record-low-after-young-people-disengage-20190530-p51sol.html
Just imagine a protest march with 1.5 million participants.
there was something like that on 1989-06-04 apparently
Oh well, maybe next time the Labs will actually talk about stuff like climate change, rather than focussing on not looking too bad to people who aren’t going to vote for them anyway.
Out of the other lower house seats, I’ll be particularly interested to see the results of the preference distribution in Joel Fitzgibbon’s seat of Hunter, where there is a chance the One Nation candidate might draw ahead of the Nationals candidate to make the final count. The Nationals have 23.5% of the primary vote to One Nation’s 21.6%, but by applying Senate preference flows from 2016 to allocate the minor parties, I get this narrowing to 27.1% to 26.3%. If nothing else, One Nation making it to second will provide us with hard data on how Coalition preferences divide between Labor and One Nation, a circumstance that has never arisen before at a federal election. The result in the seat of Mirani at the Queensland election in 2017 suggests it should be a bit short of 80%. If so, Fitzgibbon should emerge with a winning margin of about 2%, compared with his 3.0% lead in the Labor-versus-National count.
https://www.pollbludger.net
https://www.pollbludger.net/2019/06/05/why-what-happened-happened/
22% of voters said they had paid close attention to the election. 34% said “some attention”, and 44% said they paid “little to no attention”. 11% said they decided who to vote for on the day of the election.
dv said:
What are the colours in the second chart?
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
What are the colours in the second chart?
I did mean to ask the same question.
All 151 seats have been declared now. No surprises.
77 Coalition, 68 ALP
1 Green, 1 Katter, 1 Central Alliance
Three independents: Steggals, Wilkie, Haines
dv said:
All 151 seats have been declared now. No surprises.77 Coalition, 68 ALP
1 Green, 1 Katter, 1 Central Alliance
Three independents: Steggals, Wilkie, Haines
What was the final swing?
dv said:
All 151 seats have been declared now. No surprises.77 Coalition, 68 ALP
1 Green, 1 Katter, 1 Central Alliance
Three independents: Steggals, Wilkie, Haines
So the lower house is secure for the Coalition if they can winkle out the one senate seat still undecided they’ll be home free. Be able to sell Medicare, sell the ABC and introduce conscription.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
All 151 seats have been declared now. No surprises.77 Coalition, 68 ALP
1 Green, 1 Katter, 1 Central Alliance
Three independents: Steggals, Wilkie, Haines
So the lower house is secure for the Coalition if they can winkle out the one senate seat still undecided they’ll be home free. Be able to sell Medicare, sell the ABC and introduce conscription.
Do you really think SloMo will do anything other than chat to reporters. Huh, not a chance.
How is the Senate panning out?
buffy said:
How is the Senate panning out?
Last I looked the Coalition and the ALP/Greens will have equal seats if the Greens win the undecided seat in Queensland, so it all comes down to basically the cross bench of 2 CA, 2 ON 1 Aust Conservative and Jacquieque Lambieque.
Peak Warming Man said:
buffy said:How is the Senate panning out?
Last I looked the Coalition and the ALP/Greens will have equal seats if the Greens win the undecided seat in Queensland, so it all comes down to basically the cross bench of 2 CA, 2 ON 1 Aust Conservative and Jacquieque Lambieque.
What Pedro says.
Probably the only really uncertain seat at this point is that last Qld slot, and that’s up between the ALP and Greens, so eitherway it is not going to change the overall political balance in the Senate.
Of course there could be some major shock in the remaining below the line votes but you know … probably not.
Coalition 35
ALP 26 (probably)
Green 9 (probably)
Centre Alliance 2
One Nation 2
Conservatives 1
Lambie 1
The Coalition will need 4 more votes to pass legislation. Could be interesting times.
One the face of it, the Coalition has picked up 4 senators, which you might think would have greatly improved its condition, but it hasn’t helped that much. The ALP and Greens are basically in the same position as before (35 total). Hinch Party (1) is out, Storer (who was a former Xenophonian) (1) is out, United Australia Party (1) is out, Liberal Democrat (1) is out.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
All 151 seats have been declared now. No surprises.77 Coalition, 68 ALP
1 Green, 1 Katter, 1 Central Alliance
Three independents: Steggals, Wilkie, Haines
What was the final swing?
Although each division has been declared, a 2PP count has not yet been announced for all of the divisions in which the final count was not between ALP and the Coalition, so we don’t have the final 2PP yet, but it will be something in the realm of 51.5 – 48.5
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
buffy said:How is the Senate panning out?
Last I looked the Coalition and the ALP/Greens will have equal seats if the Greens win the undecided seat in Queensland, so it all comes down to basically the cross bench of 2 CA, 2 ON 1 Aust Conservative and Jacquieque Lambieque.
What Pedro says.
Probably the only really uncertain seat at this point is that last Qld slot, and that’s up between the ALP and Greens, so eitherway it is not going to change the overall political balance in the Senate.
Of course there could be some major shock in the remaining below the line votes but you know … probably not.
Coalition 35
ALP 26 (probably)
Green 9 (probably)
Centre Alliance 2
One Nation 2
Conservatives 1
Lambie 1The Coalition will need 4 more votes to pass legislation. Could be interesting times.
One the face of it, the Coalition has picked up 4 senators, which you might think would have greatly improved its condition, but it hasn’t helped that much. The ALP and Greens are basically in the same position as before (35 total). Hinch Party (1) is out, Storer (who was a former Xenophonian) (1) is out, United Australia Party (1) is out, Liberal Democrat (1) is out.
Lambi is a wild card although she has already told Southern Cross Radio that she will not vote to leave the EU, it could all come down to cock size.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:Last I looked the Coalition and the ALP/Greens will have equal seats if the Greens win the undecided seat in Queensland, so it all comes down to basically the cross bench of 2 CA, 2 ON 1 Aust Conservative and Jacquieque Lambieque.
What Pedro says.
Probably the only really uncertain seat at this point is that last Qld slot, and that’s up between the ALP and Greens, so eitherway it is not going to change the overall political balance in the Senate.
Of course there could be some major shock in the remaining below the line votes but you know … probably not.
Coalition 35
ALP 26 (probably)
Green 9 (probably)
Centre Alliance 2
One Nation 2
Conservatives 1
Lambie 1The Coalition will need 4 more votes to pass legislation. Could be interesting times.
One the face of it, the Coalition has picked up 4 senators, which you might think would have greatly improved its condition, but it hasn’t helped that much. The ALP and Greens are basically in the same position as before (35 total). Hinch Party (1) is out, Storer (who was a former Xenophonian) (1) is out, United Australia Party (1) is out, Liberal Democrat (1) is out.
Lambi is a wild card although she has already told Southern Cross Radio that she will not vote to leave the EU, it could all come down to cock size.
We’ll miss Hawkey even more
Okay, AEC has started pressing buttons on the senate count, so far quite as expected.
Tasmania
1. Colbeck (Lib)
2. Brown (ALP)
3. Chandler (Lib)
4. McKim (Green)
5. Bilyk (ALP)
6. Lambie (JLN)
ACT
1. Gallagher (ALP)
2. Seselja (Lib)
NT was already a foregone conclusion with both ALP and CLP reaching a quota without the help of preferences.
In Tasmania, the Fraser Anning Candidate (Frank Falzon) received the lowest number of votes.
dv said:
In Tasmania, the Fraser Anning Candidate (Frank Falzon) received the lowest number of votes.
To the distress and wailing of the Put Steve Mav last group. But in the end they were satisfied with the result.
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
All 151 seats have been declared now. No surprises.77 Coalition, 68 ALP
1 Green, 1 Katter, 1 Central Alliance
Three independents: Steggals, Wilkie, Haines
What was the final swing?
Although each division has been declared, a 2PP count has not yet been announced for all of the divisions in which the final count was not between ALP and the Coalition, so we don’t have the final 2PP yet, but it will be something in the realm of 51.5 – 48.5
I’ve listened to the hindsight commentariate knowingly telling us why the ALP lost, none of it washes.
I thought the Coalition would get smashed 55/45 and if I went through it all again there is nothing that would change my mind.
It’s one of lifes little mysteries that we will never know.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:What was the final swing?
Although each division has been declared, a 2PP count has not yet been announced for all of the divisions in which the final count was not between ALP and the Coalition, so we don’t have the final 2PP yet, but it will be something in the realm of 51.5 – 48.5
I’ve listened to the hindsight commentariate knowingly telling us why the ALP lost, none of it washes.
I thought the Coalition would get smashed 55/45 and if I went through it all again there is nothing that would change my mind.
It’s one of lifes little mysteries that we will never know.
It was all the lies and other shit Morrison and Co threw, with more of it sticking than should have.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:What was the final swing?
Although each division has been declared, a 2PP count has not yet been announced for all of the divisions in which the final count was not between ALP and the Coalition, so we don’t have the final 2PP yet, but it will be something in the realm of 51.5 – 48.5
I’ve listened to the hindsight commentariate knowingly telling us why the ALP lost, none of it washes.
I thought the Coalition would get smashed 55/45 and if I went through it all again there is nothing that would change my mind.
It’s one of lifes little mysteries that we will never know.
I’ve told you why ALP lost this election. Many times. Its leader had no brain.
mollwollfumble said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:Although each division has been declared, a 2PP count has not yet been announced for all of the divisions in which the final count was not between ALP and the Coalition, so we don’t have the final 2PP yet, but it will be something in the realm of 51.5 – 48.5
I’ve listened to the hindsight commentariate knowingly telling us why the ALP lost, none of it washes.
I thought the Coalition would get smashed 55/45 and if I went through it all again there is nothing that would change my mind.
It’s one of lifes little mysteries that we will never know.I’ve told you why ALP lost this election. Many times. Its leader had no brain.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-19/federal-election-map-coalition-defies-polls-retains-power/11127084
Outgoing Tasmanian Senator Lisa Singh fires some parting shots across Labor’s bow
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-16/lisa-singh-fires-parting-shots-at-labor/11213604
sarahs mum said:
Outgoing Tasmanian Senator Lisa Singh fires some parting shots across Labor’s bowhttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-16/lisa-singh-fires-parting-shots-at-labor/11213604
Can’t blame her.
I just watched Ahn paint Alan Jones. A rerun.
During the interview Jones talks about when he was a speechwriter for Fraser. They were getting behind in the polls to Labor and so they came up with the idea for a blanket campaign at the very end of the run up to say that Labor was going to tax the family home.
I wonder if that would work again?
National two party preferred count has now been completed, 51.53% – 49.47%.
The Senate has also been finalised except for Victoria. There’ve been no surprises, it went as projected by ABC a couple of weeks back.
dv said:
National two party preferred count has now been completed, 51.53% – 49.47%.The Senate has also been finalised except for Victoria. There’ve been no surprises, it went as projected by ABC a couple of weeks back.
If it hadn’t been for the extra 1% votes it would have been really close.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
National two party preferred count has now been completed, 51.53% – 49.47%.The Senate has also been finalised except for Victoria. There’ve been no surprises, it went as projected by ABC a couple of weeks back.
If it hadn’t been for the extra 1% votes it would have been really close.
Hehe.
Peak Warming Man said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
National two party preferred count has now been completed, 51.53% – 49.47%.The Senate has also been finalised except for Victoria. There’ve been no surprises, it went as projected by ABC a couple of weeks back.
If it hadn’t been for the extra 1% votes it would have been really close.
Hehe.
> The new Senate is likely to comprise 35 coalition members, 26 Labor, nine Greens, two One Nation, two Centre Alliance, one Australian Conservatives and Jacqui Lambie.
“two Centre Alliance”
Yes yes yes yes yes. I didn’t have the option of voting for them here, or I would have.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
National two party preferred count has now been completed, 51.53% – 49.47%.The Senate has also been finalised except for Victoria. There’ve been no surprises, it went as projected by ABC a couple of weeks back.
If it hadn’t been for the extra 1% votes it would have been really close.
If the results were quite different they wouldn’t have been the same
Anybody vote for the science party for senate?
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
National two party preferred count has now been completed, 51.53% – 49.47%.The Senate has also been finalised except for Victoria. There’ve been no surprises, it went as projected by ABC a couple of weeks back.
If it hadn’t been for the extra 1% votes it would have been really close.
If the results were quite different they wouldn’t have been the same
Dude you’ve got 101% there.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:If it hadn’t been for the extra 1% votes it would have been really close.
If the results were quite different they wouldn’t have been the same
Dude you’ve got 101% there.
Typo
mollwollfumble said:
Anybody vote for the science party for senate?
Approximately 19000 people voted for the Science Party in the Senate.
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
National two party preferred count has now been completed, 51.53% – 49.47%.The Senate has also been finalised except for Victoria. There’ve been no surprises, it went as projected by ABC a couple of weeks back.
If it hadn’t been for the extra 1% votes it would have been really close.
If the results were quite different they wouldn’t have been the same
mollwollfumble said:
Anybody vote for the science party for senate?
did not run any candidates here.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:If the results were quite different they wouldn’t have been the same
Dude you’ve got 101% there.
Typo
You’re falling to pieces….
https://www.pollbludger.net/2019/08/03/federal-election-preference-flows/
Preference flows from the 2019 election
Federal election preference flows
New figures from the AEC confirm the Coalition’s share of Hanson and Palmer preferences was approaching two-thirds, a dramatic increase on past form.