Date: 15/05/2019 11:32:16
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1386861
Subject: Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

The international consortium behind the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) have completed the five-year process of designing one of two supercomputers that will crunch its way through the mountains of celestial data collected by the fields of radio telescopes.

more…

Reply Quote

Date: 15/05/2019 11:34:00
From: Cymek
ID: 1386864
Subject: re: Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

Kudos Australia and Perth gets one of them, sweet

Reply Quote

Date: 15/05/2019 11:35:32
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1386865
Subject: re: Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

Tau.Neutrino said:


Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

The international consortium behind the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) have completed the five-year process of designing one of two supercomputers that will crunch its way through the mountains of celestial data collected by the fields of radio telescopes.

more…

Seems a bit odd to me that astronomers should design a special computer for their needs, rather than just programming an off the shelf machine, but I suppose they’d have their reasons.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/05/2019 12:14:11
From: poikilotherm
ID: 1386874
Subject: re: Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

The Rev Dodgson said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

The international consortium behind the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) have completed the five-year process of designing one of two supercomputers that will crunch its way through the mountains of celestial data collected by the fields of radio telescopes.

more…

Seems a bit odd to me that astronomers should design a special computer for their needs, rather than just programming an off the shelf machine, but I suppose they’d have their reasons.

“We estimate SDP’s total compute power to be around 250 PFlops – that’s 25 percent faster than IBM’s Summit, the current fastest supercomputer in the world.”

Yea, they should’ve just got a Dell or some such for Officeworks…

Reply Quote

Date: 15/05/2019 12:23:51
From: Cymek
ID: 1386879
Subject: re: Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

poikilotherm said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

The international consortium behind the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) have completed the five-year process of designing one of two supercomputers that will crunch its way through the mountains of celestial data collected by the fields of radio telescopes.

more…

Seems a bit odd to me that astronomers should design a special computer for their needs, rather than just programming an off the shelf machine, but I suppose they’d have their reasons.

“We estimate SDP’s total compute power to be around 250 PFlops – that’s 25 percent faster than IBM’s Summit, the current fastest supercomputer in the world.”

Yea, they should’ve just got a Dell or some such for Officeworks…

Pity the connection will be FTTN

Reply Quote

Date: 15/05/2019 16:57:27
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1387038
Subject: re: Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

poikilotherm said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

Designs for Square Kilometre Array’s supercomputer completed

The international consortium behind the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) have completed the five-year process of designing one of two supercomputers that will crunch its way through the mountains of celestial data collected by the fields of radio telescopes.

more…

Seems a bit odd to me that astronomers should design a special computer for their needs, rather than just programming an off the shelf machine, but I suppose they’d have their reasons.

“We estimate SDP’s total compute power to be around 250 PFlops – that’s 25 percent faster than IBM’s Summit, the current fastest supercomputer in the world.”

Yea, they should’ve just got a Dell or some such for Officeworks…

I’d be prepared to bet, it’s commercial in confidence so nobody knows, that at least one of Google’s central computers is faster. In which case they could have just bought computing time on the cloud.

Just kidding – or am I?

Reply Quote