Bang goes the deniers excuse that more co2 acts as a fertilizer that will benefit the world.

>>As human activity continually pumps carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the Earth is doing its damnedest to stash it all away, in the oceans and forests. But new research led by the University of Cambridge has found that forests may not be as useful a carbon sink as we thought. The team found that a warming climate makes trees grow faster and die younger, releasing their captured carbon back into the air sooner.

One of the most common arguments against the dangers of climate change is that more CO2 in the air is good for plants, which capture the gas and store it in their cells. That’s true to an extent – young trees have been found to grow faster as temperatures warm up and there’s more carbon dioxide in the air. It’s been thought that greening the Earth with more trees could help offset some of the increases in CO2 emissions, but the new study shows that this might not work out as well as we’d have hoped.<<

https://newatlas.com/forest-carbon-sinks-less-effective/59707/

LIES MAKE BABY JESUS CRY PF

The-Spectator said:

LIES MAKE BABY JESUS CRY PF

Deniers have never been very good with real science, apparently it conflicts with their child-like ideology.

Make more things of wood

PermeateFree said:

Bang goes the deniers excuse that more co2 acts as a fertilizer that will benefit the world.

>>As human activity continually pumps carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the Earth is doing its damnedest to stash it all away, in the oceans and forests. But new research led by the University of Cambridge has found that forests may not be as useful a carbon sink as we thought. The team found that a warming climate makes trees grow faster and die younger, releasing their captured carbon back into the air sooner.

One of the most common arguments against the dangers of climate change is that more CO2 in the air is good for plants, which capture the gas and store it in their cells. That’s true to an extent – young trees have been found to grow faster as temperatures warm up and there’s more carbon dioxide in the air. It’s been thought that greening the Earth with more trees could help offset some of the increases in CO2 emissions, but the new study shows that this might not work out as well as we’d have hoped.<<

https://newatlas.com/forest-carbon-sinks-less-effective/59707/

Don’t let it stop the planting of trees though.
As an aside, the exttra CO2 will make the cannabis stronger.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Bang goes the deniers excuse that more co2 acts as a fertilizer that will benefit the world.

>>As human activity continually pumps carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the Earth is doing its damnedest to stash it all away, in the oceans and forests. But new research led by the University of Cambridge has found that forests may not be as useful a carbon sink as we thought. The team found that a warming climate makes trees grow faster and die younger, releasing their captured carbon back into the air sooner.

One of the most common arguments against the dangers of climate change is that more CO2 in the air is good for plants, which capture the gas and store it in their cells. That’s true to an extent – young trees have been found to grow faster as temperatures warm up and there’s more carbon dioxide in the air. It’s been thought that greening the Earth with more trees could help offset some of the increases in CO2 emissions, but the new study shows that this might not work out as well as we’d have hoped.<<

https://newatlas.com/forest-carbon-sinks-less-effective/59707/

Don’t let it stop the planting of trees though.
As an aside, the exttra CO2 will make the cannabis stronger.

We’ve known the plants are fcked if it gets hot and full of CO2 for quite some time.

“By calculating photosynthesis on the basis of the kinetics of Rubisco and the amount of active enzyme in the leaf, the authors have shown that, under both high temperature and high CO2, photosynthesis was constrained by the activity of Rubisco activase.”

https://www.pnas.org/content/97/24/12937

poikilotherm said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Bang goes the deniers excuse that more co2 acts as a fertilizer that will benefit the world.

>>As human activity continually pumps carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the Earth is doing its damnedest to stash it all away, in the oceans and forests. But new research led by the University of Cambridge has found that forests may not be as useful a carbon sink as we thought. The team found that a warming climate makes trees grow faster and die younger, releasing their captured carbon back into the air sooner.

One of the most common arguments against the dangers of climate change is that more CO2 in the air is good for plants, which capture the gas and store it in their cells. That’s true to an extent – young trees have been found to grow faster as temperatures warm up and there’s more carbon dioxide in the air. It’s been thought that greening the Earth with more trees could help offset some of the increases in CO2 emissions, but the new study shows that this might not work out as well as we’d have hoped.<<

https://newatlas.com/forest-carbon-sinks-less-effective/59707/

Don’t let it stop the planting of trees though.
As an aside, the exttra CO2 will make the cannabis stronger.

We’ve known the plants are fcked if it gets hot and full of CO2 for quite some time.

“By calculating photosynthesis on the basis of the kinetics of Rubisco and the amount of active enzyme in the leaf, the authors have shown that, under both high temperature and high CO2, photosynthesis was constrained by the activity of Rubisco activase.”

https://www.pnas.org/content/97/24/12937

Perhaps we will kill off all land and sea plant life and run out of oxygen

Cymek said:

poikilotherm said:

roughbarked said:

Don’t let it stop the planting of trees though.
As an aside, the exttra CO2 will make the cannabis stronger.

We’ve known the plants are fcked if it gets hot and full of CO2 for quite some time.

“By calculating photosynthesis on the basis of the kinetics of Rubisco and the amount of active enzyme in the leaf, the authors have shown that, under both high temperature and high CO2, photosynthesis was constrained by the activity of Rubisco activase.”

https://www.pnas.org/content/97/24/12937

Perhaps we will kill off all land and sea plant life and run out of oxygen

What do you mean, perhaps?

roughbarked said:

Cymek said:

poikilotherm said:

We’ve known the plants are fcked if it gets hot and full of CO2 for quite some time.

“By calculating photosynthesis on the basis of the kinetics of Rubisco and the amount of active enzyme in the leaf, the authors have shown that, under both high temperature and high CO2, photosynthesis was constrained by the activity of Rubisco activase.”

https://www.pnas.org/content/97/24/12937

Perhaps we will kill off all land and sea plant life and run out of oxygen

What do you mean, perhaps?

Not all of it I imagine, but what if we did end up with a Bladerunner world were everything is dead except humans

Cymek said:

roughbarked said:

Cymek said:

Perhaps we will kill off all land and sea plant life and run out of oxygen

What do you mean, perhaps?

Not all of it I imagine, but what if we did end up with a Bladerunner world were everything is dead except humans

Bladerunner? Try Earth Abides, George R Stewart, 1949

Cymek said:

roughbarked said:

Cymek said:

Perhaps we will kill off all land and sea plant life and run out of oxygen

What do you mean, perhaps?

Not all of it I imagine, but what if we did end up with a Bladerunner world were everything is dead except humans

Did you ever see anyone in Bladerunner having a meal?

PermeateFree said:

Cymek said:

roughbarked said:

What do you mean, perhaps?

Not all of it I imagine, but what if we did end up with a Bladerunner world were everything is dead except humans

Did you ever see anyone in Bladerunner having a meal?

Noodles I think and in the new movie grubs grown in tanks

PermeateFree said:

Cymek said:

roughbarked said:

What do you mean, perhaps?

Not all of it I imagine, but what if we did end up with a Bladerunner world were everything is dead except humans

Did you ever see anyone in Bladerunner having a meal?

poikilotherm said:

PermeateFree said:

Cymek said:

Not all of it I imagine, but what if we did end up with a Bladerunner world were everything is dead except humans

Did you ever see anyone in Bladerunner having a meal?

Noodles have a pact with nature, inasmuch noodles need nature. So the noodles he is eating must have been made from ingredients that were grown before everything except humans died. Therefore just a matter of time before the bladerunners follow suit.

PermeateFree said:

Cymek said:

roughbarked said:

What do you mean, perhaps?

Not all of it I imagine, but what if we did end up with a Bladerunner world were everything is dead except humans

Did you ever see anyone in Bladerunner having a meal?

yes.