mollwollfumble said:
Cymek said:
monkey skipper said:
How traverse the changes of time , language and future technologies and bridging those gaps and also loss of family members and separation of literal time in years would be an emotional decision for or against using the travel option. I imagine this will be the reason why some people opt to walk away from technology , whilst some will embrace it.
Yes society would change almost beyond recognition and you’d need some sort of organisation that can survive this long almost quasi-religious in nature to welcome this people back into the fold and have some understanding of whom they are/were
C J Cherryh (in better books) and William Rottsler (in The far frontier) talk sensibly about the consequences of that. Most SciFi authors don’t.
Yes, time dilation causes all sorts of family mix-ups. Husbands lose their wives, boss and junior swap roles. News of the progress of a war doesn’t get back to the loser. Commandos suddenly find that their quarry is fully prepared for their arrival. When combined with suspended animation, a person may find themselves to be older than their great great grandparent.
Technology takes time to catch up. Finance becomes a problem in waiting for returns on a space venture. Unscrupulous individuals steal wealth and disappear before anyone else can find out. Politics becomes almost irrelevant because the timescale of politics is too short.
Gene Roddenberry and the creators of Star Trek were dreamers, they had knowledge of the problems and they imagined the solutions, Warp Drives, sub-space communications, acceleration dampers etc.
They fit Bernard Shaw’s quote “Some men see things as they are and ask why, others dream things that never were and ask why not.”
It’s the dreamers who will shape our destiny, the movers and shakers will make the dreams come true.
A little break through here a small baby step there and little by little the obstacles you envisage now will not be there in 500 years time.