30 spectacular photos.
https://newatlas.com/digital-cameras/nature-conservancy-2019-photo-contest-winners-gallery/
30 spectacular photos.
https://newatlas.com/digital-cameras/nature-conservancy-2019-photo-contest-winners-gallery/
the zebra one is cool…
I like the ones taken by a drone.. but they are always going to be pretty because it’s a unique view that we don’t usually get to see
I like the ones that won prizes. And the surfer.
PermeateFree said:
30 spectacular photos.https://newatlas.com/digital-cameras/nature-conservancy-2019-photo-contest-winners-gallery/
> over 120,000 entries, more than double last year’s tally.
So only 0.025% of submissions are spectacular?
mollwollfumble said:
PermeateFree said:
30 spectacular photos.https://newatlas.com/digital-cameras/nature-conservancy-2019-photo-contest-winners-gallery/
> over 120,000 entries, more than double last year’s tally.
So only 0.025% of submissions are spectacular?
Your mind works in strange ways.
PermeateFree said:
mollwollfumble said:
PermeateFree said:
30 spectacular photos.https://newatlas.com/digital-cameras/nature-conservancy-2019-photo-contest-winners-gallery/
> over 120,000 entries, more than double last year’s tally.
So only 0.025% of submissions are spectacular?
Your mind works in strange ways.
I suppose that’s different from mysterious ways.
roughbarked said:
PermeateFree said:
mollwollfumble said:> over 120,000 entries, more than double last year’s tally.
So only 0.025% of submissions are spectacular?
Your mind works in strange ways.
I suppose that’s different from mysterious ways.
I don’t see it as all that strange. I see it as WTF are all these people so deluded as to think they can win.
By the way, I recognised one of the prizewinning photographers. Ze takes every photograph the exact same way with the exact same camera, setup and background.
mollwollfumble said:
roughbarked said:
PermeateFree said:Your mind works in strange ways.
I suppose that’s different from mysterious ways.
I don’t see it as all that strange. I see it as WTF are all these people so deluded as to think they can win.
By the way, I recognised one of the prizewinning photographers. Ze takes every photograph the exact same way with the exact same camera, setup and background.
Some people just take pride in their photographs and want share with others, why you should want to reduce this form of self-fulfillment into something as simple crass ego gratification is IMO strange and also disturbing.
PermeateFree said:
mollwollfumble said:
roughbarked said:I suppose that’s different from mysterious ways.
I don’t see it as all that strange. I see it as WTF are all these people so deluded as to think they can win.
By the way, I recognised one of the prizewinning photographers. Ze takes every photograph the exact same way with the exact same camera, setup and background.
Some people just take pride in their photographs and want share with others, why you should want to reduce this form of self-fulfillment into something as simple crass ego gratification is IMO strange and also disturbing.
So why make it a competition?
mollwollfumble said:
PermeateFree said:
mollwollfumble said:I don’t see it as all that strange. I see it as WTF are all these people so deluded as to think they can win.
By the way, I recognised one of the prizewinning photographers. Ze takes every photograph the exact same way with the exact same camera, setup and background.
Some people just take pride in their photographs and want share with others, why you should want to reduce this form of self-fulfillment into something as simple crass ego gratification is IMO strange and also disturbing.
So why make it a competition?
Sorry, i phrased that one wrongly. I meant to say:
There should be more prizes.
mollwollfumble said:
mollwollfumble said:
PermeateFree said:Some people just take pride in their photographs and want share with others, why you should want to reduce this form of self-fulfillment into something as simple crass ego gratification is IMO strange and also disturbing.
So why make it a competition?
Sorry, i phrased that one wrongly. I meant to say:
There should be more prizes.
You maybe are right, but that is not what you said initially.