Date: 21/11/2019 10:56:22
From: sibeen
ID: 1464420
Subject: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Pakistan won the toss and are going to have a bat.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 13:06:01
From: sibeen
ID: 1464470
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Lunch. Pakistan 0/57.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 13:17:58
From: Ian
ID: 1464473
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Who killed the Gabba pitch?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 13:19:32
From: party_pants
ID: 1464474
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


Who killed the Gabba pitch?

ScoMo, but now is not the time to talk about it.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 14:16:15
From: sibeen
ID: 1464490
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 14:16:39
From: sibeen
ID: 1464491
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

FUCK OFF

2/75

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 14:56:26
From: Ian
ID: 1464500
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

FUCK OFF

FUCK OFF

4/81

Beeno must be drunk already!

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 15:11:42
From: sibeen
ID: 1464513
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:

FUCK OFF

FUCK OFF

4/81

Beeno must be drunk already!

I’m trying to get a document ready for tomorrow. The client wanted something cheap and nasty done as they hadn’t budgeted correctly, so I sent them a price for a desktop study without all the trimmings. I’ve already gone over time on what I quoted as there’s been some project creep. An hour ago they sent me a document for another site that they want the document to look like. This is a rolls royce optioned up. I’ve been trying to ring the client to say WTF?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 15:15:25
From: sibeen
ID: 1464518
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 15:16:03
From: Ian
ID: 1464519
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

GOAT!!

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 16:29:10
From: Ian
ID: 1464535
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

FUCK OFF

6/151

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 16:31:15
From: sibeen
ID: 1464536
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


FUCK OFF

6/151

Hey, hey, hey, I was getting around to it.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 16:32:14
From: Ian
ID: 1464537
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Where is the back edge of a boot?
This will be debated for the rest of the series.. century……

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 16:34:13
From: Ian
ID: 1464538
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Ian said:

FUCK OFF

6/151

Hey, hey, hey, I was getting around to it.

:)

Yeah, I know you were working drinking.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 16:38:21
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1464539
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


Where is the back edge of a boot?
This will be debated for the rest of the series.. century……

They are going to send all the footage they have of the back foot to the CSIRO Forensic Film Unit (FFU) for analysis.
Could take a couple of weeks but if the evidence is conclusive that no part of the foot was behind the line the batsman will be recalled.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 16:55:10
From: Ian
ID: 1464540
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 17:30:59
From: dv
ID: 1464546
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:



wikiumpiring

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 17:44:22
From: Ian
ID: 1464549
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

dv said:


Ian said:


wikiumpiring

Clearly distorted by the number of Paki cricket fans.

It was an obvious line ball no ball call given that the overhang of the heel of the boot counts as boot. No no ball for mine.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 17:44:33
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1464550
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Another wicked would be nice.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 17:47:16
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1464551
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


dv said:

Ian said:


wikiumpiring

Clearly distorted by the number of Paki cricket fans.

It was an obvious line ball no ball call given that the overhang of the heel of the boot counts as boot. No no ball for mine.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 17:55:36
From: dv
ID: 1464552
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

At some level we have to accept that umpires are human and that there are cases that really are on the edge of determinability, and in such cases you can’t be too aggrieved no matter which way it goes.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 17:56:35
From: party_pants
ID: 1464553
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

dv said:


At some level we have to accept that umpires are human and that there are cases that really are on the edge of determinability, and in such cases you can’t be too aggrieved no matter which way it goes.

nah, that’s not how it works

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 17:57:16
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1464554
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

>>At some level we have to accept that umpires are human

Steady.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 17:57:39
From: Boris
ID: 1464555
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

dv said:


At some level we have to accept that umpires are human and that there are cases that really are on the edge of determinability, and in such cases you can’t be too aggrieved no matter which way it goes.

wouldn’t thinking like that cut out all the to and fro arguments that go on forever and never get a resolution?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 17:59:26
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1464556
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Boris said:


dv said:

At some level we have to accept that umpires are human and that there are cases that really are on the edge of determinability, and in such cases you can’t be too aggrieved no matter which way it goes.

wouldn’t thinking like that cut out all the to and fro arguments that go on forever and never get a resolution?

Yeah he just hasn’t thought this through.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 18:01:36
From: Boris
ID: 1464557
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Peak Warming Man said:


Boris said:

dv said:

At some level we have to accept that umpires are human and that there are cases that really are on the edge of determinability, and in such cases you can’t be too aggrieved no matter which way it goes.

wouldn’t thinking like that cut out all the to and fro arguments that go on forever and never get a resolution?

Yeah he just hasn’t thought this through.

n00bs eh!

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 18:02:49
From: sibeen
ID: 1464558
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Peak Warming Man said:


Another wicked would be nice.

Take new ball:

FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF

There ya go.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 18:06:18
From: Ian
ID: 1464560
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Peak Warming Man said:

Another wicked would be nice.

Take new ball:

FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF

There ya go.

About fuckin time

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 18:25:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464565
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

That’s the end of the innings.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 18:25:22
From: Ian
ID: 1464567
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

ALL FUCK OFF 240

Can’t wait for HasBeen all night.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2019 18:27:10
From: sibeen
ID: 1464568
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Not bad after they were 0/57 at lunch.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 12:53:37
From: sibeen
ID: 1464819
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Warner 50 up..Aus 0/95.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 12:55:10
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1464822
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Warner 50 up..Aus 0/95.

Gunna be a loooong day in the field

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 12:56:26
From: Ian
ID: 1464823
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Warner 50 up..Aus 0/95.

Better than his total in the Ashes.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 12:57:43
From: dv
ID: 1464825
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Home town bully

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 13:03:03
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1464826
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


sibeen said:

Warner 50 up..Aus 0/95.

Better than his total in the Ashes.

The English Duke ball swings considerably more than the Kookaburra and Davy didn’t handle it well, should have stayed in the navy.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 13:05:02
From: dv
ID: 1464827
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Peak Warming Man said:


Ian said:

sibeen said:

Warner 50 up..Aus 0/95.

Better than his total in the Ashes.

The English Duke ball swings considerably more than the Kookaburra and Davy didn’t handle it well, should have stayed in the navy.

are we still doing Duke jokes?

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 13:06:44
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1464829
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

dv said:


Peak Warming Man said:

Ian said:

Better than his total in the Ashes.

The English Duke ball swings considerably more than the Kookaburra and Davy didn’t handle it well, should have stayed in the navy.

are we still doing Duke jokes?

LOL, looks like it.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 13:51:30
From: Ian
ID: 1464856
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

ROFL

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 13:53:01
From: sibeen
ID: 1464858
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

snigger

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 14:16:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1464875
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

50 for Burns.

0/120

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 14:18:17
From: Boris
ID: 1464878
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


50 for Burns.

0/120

excellent.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 14:21:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464883
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Boris said:


sibeen said:

50 for Burns.

0/120

excellent.

Yes, that is an excellent start.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 15:28:22
From: party_pants
ID: 1464918
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

very fortunate that one, in by 1 cm.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 15:29:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464919
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


very fortunate that one, in by 1 cm.

still nuns for 181.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 15:31:01
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1464920
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

They had the cricket on in the GP waiting room. I saw an Australian batter being hit on the elbow with the ball and knocked to the ground.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 15:32:00
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464921
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Bubblecar said:


They had the cricket on in the GP waiting room. I saw an Australian batter being hit on the elbow with the ball and knocked to the ground.

Happens too often.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 15:42:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464926
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Warner goes to tea on 99.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 15:42:17
From: Tamb
ID: 1464927
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


very fortunate that one, in by 1 cm.

Looks like the bail was obove the RH groove but still in the LH one. Other bail was undisturbed at that time.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 15:47:15
From: party_pants
ID: 1464929
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Tamb said:


party_pants said:

very fortunate that one, in by 1 cm.

Looks like the bail was obove the RH groove but still in the LH one. Other bail was undisturbed at that time.

I reckon if they has the LED lights like they do in T20s and ODIs that would have been on the line = out. Without the electronics the TV umpire has to scroll forward a frame or two to when the whole bail is clearly removed from the stumps.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 15:48:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464930
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


Tamb said:

party_pants said:

very fortunate that one, in by 1 cm.

Looks like the bail was obove the RH groove but still in the LH one. Other bail was undisturbed at that time.

I reckon if they has the LED lights like they do in T20s and ODIs that would have been on the line = out. Without the electronics the TV umpire has to scroll forward a frame or two to when the whole bail is clearly removed from the stumps.

Don’t quote me on it but the lights probably shouldn’t flash until the bail completely leaves the stumps.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 15:54:41
From: party_pants
ID: 1464933
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

Tamb said:

Looks like the bail was obove the RH groove but still in the LH one. Other bail was undisturbed at that time.

I reckon if they has the LED lights like they do in T20s and ODIs that would have been on the line = out. Without the electronics the TV umpire has to scroll forward a frame or two to when the whole bail is clearly removed from the stumps.

Don’t quote me on it but the lights probably shouldn’t flash until the bail completely leaves the stumps.

I think it does, when one bail loses electrical contact with the stumps on both ends, then they all light up through a wifi signal. The separation only needs to be a fraction of a mm.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:00:10
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464938
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


roughbarked said:

party_pants said:

I reckon if they has the LED lights like they do in T20s and ODIs that would have been on the line = out. Without the electronics the TV umpire has to scroll forward a frame or two to when the whole bail is clearly removed from the stumps.

Don’t quote me on it but the lights probably shouldn’t flash until the bail completely leaves the stumps.

I think it does, when one bail loses electrical contact with the stumps on both ends, then they all light up through a wifi signal. The separation only needs to be a fraction of a mm.


21 Pakistan no balls not called.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:06:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464939
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

roughbarked said:


Warner goes to tea on 99.

and comes back to a maiden over.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:09:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464940
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

roughbarked said:


roughbarked said:

Warner goes to tea on 99.

and comes back to a maiden over.

Now he has his first century in 23 months.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:26:56
From: Tamb
ID: 1464942
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


Tamb said:

party_pants said:

very fortunate that one, in by 1 cm.

Looks like the bail was obove the RH groove but still in the LH one. Other bail was undisturbed at that time.

I reckon if they has the LED lights like they do in T20s and ODIs that would have been on the line = out. Without the electronics the TV umpire has to scroll forward a frame or two to when the whole bail is clearly removed from the stumps.

Each bail must have both ends clear of its groove.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:28:31
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464943
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Tamb said:


party_pants said:

Tamb said:

Looks like the bail was obove the RH groove but still in the LH one. Other bail was undisturbed at that time.

I reckon if they has the LED lights like they do in T20s and ODIs that would have been on the line = out. Without the electronics the TV umpire has to scroll forward a frame or two to when the whole bail is clearly removed from the stumps.

Each bail must have both ends clear of its groove.

That’s what I reckoned.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:32:39
From: Tamb
ID: 1464944
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

Tamb said:

Looks like the bail was obove the RH groove but still in the LH one. Other bail was undisturbed at that time.

I reckon if they has the LED lights like they do in T20s and ODIs that would have been on the line = out. Without the electronics the TV umpire has to scroll forward a frame or two to when the whole bail is clearly removed from the stumps.

Don’t quote me on it but the lights probably shouldn’t flash until the bail completely leaves the stumps.


I agree.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:38:29
From: Tamb
ID: 1464946
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

roughbarked said:


Tamb said:

party_pants said:

I reckon if they has the LED lights like they do in T20s and ODIs that would have been on the line = out. Without the electronics the TV umpire has to scroll forward a frame or two to when the whole bail is clearly removed from the stumps.

Each bail must have both ends clear of its groove.

That’s what I reckoned.

Last year (I think) there was the weird case of a bail being dislodged vertically upwards & falling back into its groove. It was a bowled appeal & was ruled not out.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:39:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464947
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Tamb said:


roughbarked said:

Tamb said:

Each bail must have both ends clear of its groove.

That’s what I reckoned.

Last year (I think) there was the weird case of a bail being dislodged vertically upwards & falling back into its groove. It was a bowled appeal & was ruled not out.

The bails have to stay off.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:39:46
From: sibeen
ID: 1464948
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Joe Burns is making a complete pigs breakfast of his return to the Australian team.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:46:16
From: sibeen
ID: 1464950
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Joe Burns is making a complete pigs breakfast of his return to the Australian team.

He’s heeded my advice and got out before making his ton.

1/221.

Christ, the last time he played for Oz he made 180 and was immediately dropped. I really don’t know what he was thinking even getting close to a 100.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:47:09
From: Tamb
ID: 1464951
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

roughbarked said:


Tamb said:

roughbarked said:

That’s what I reckoned.

Last year (I think) there was the weird case of a bail being dislodged vertically upwards & falling back into its groove. It was a bowled appeal & was ruled not out.

The bails have to stay off.


Yes. Just looked weird on replay to see the bails clearly away from the stumps then falling back into place.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:48:55
From: Ian
ID: 1464952
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


roughbarked said:

party_pants said:

I reckon if they has the LED lights like they do in T20s and ODIs that would have been on the line = out. Without the electronics the TV umpire has to scroll forward a frame or two to when the whole bail is clearly removed from the stumps.

Don’t quote me on it but the lights probably shouldn’t flash until the bail completely leaves the stumps.

I think it does, when one bail loses electrical contact with the stumps on both ends, then they all light up through a wifi signal. The separation only needs to be a fraction of a mm.

Now now. Let’s be sensible. The true form of the Game does not need any more borowings from the degenerate T20 form.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:53:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 1464954
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


party_pants said:

roughbarked said:

Don’t quote me on it but the lights probably shouldn’t flash until the bail completely leaves the stumps.

I think it does, when one bail loses electrical contact with the stumps on both ends, then they all light up through a wifi signal. The separation only needs to be a fraction of a mm.

Now now. Let’s be sensible. The true form of the Game does not need any more borowings from the degenerate T20 form.

To be sure.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 16:57:21
From: party_pants
ID: 1464955
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


party_pants said:

roughbarked said:

Don’t quote me on it but the lights probably shouldn’t flash until the bail completely leaves the stumps.

I think it does, when one bail loses electrical contact with the stumps on both ends, then they all light up through a wifi signal. The separation only needs to be a fraction of a mm.

Now now. Let’s be sensible. The true form of the Game does not need any more borowings from the degenerate T20 form.

I am perfectly happy for it to happen. They could add a few milliseconds delay into the circuitry. It makes it easier and quicker for the TV ump, scroll to first frame where lights are on, check where the bat is. None of this toggling it back and forth, then looking for another angle, and another, and then trying to plit screen te views and blah. That review took about 2 minutes to be given not out.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 18:38:34
From: sibeen
ID: 1464989
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

1/312 at stumps.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 18:39:30
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1464990
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


1/312 at stumps.

Is that good?

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 18:46:06
From: sibeen
ID: 1464995
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

1/312 at stumps.

Is that good?

For one of the teams.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 18:47:10
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1464997
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Bubblecar said:

sibeen said:

1/312 at stumps.

Is that good?

For one of the teams.

You cricket chums like to closely guard your cricketing secrets.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 19:37:32
From: party_pants
ID: 1465021
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Bubblecar said:

Is that good?

For one of the teams.

You cricket chums like to closely guard your cricketing secrets.

Yes.

For the batting team that is a very good score. Australia were batting. Pakistan batted first (beginning yesterday) and made 240 all out. Australia have gone well beyond their score with only 1 batter out, from a possible 10.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 19:43:27
From: sibeen
ID: 1465024
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


Bubblecar said:

sibeen said:

For one of the teams.

You cricket chums like to closely guard your cricketing secrets.

Yes.

For the batting team that is a very good score. Australia were batting. Pakistan batted first (beginning yesterday) and made 240 all out. Australia have gone well beyond their score with only 1 batter out, from a possible 10.

You…you…you weren’t supposed to be divulging all this.

YOU SIGNED A NDA!!!

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 19:46:59
From: party_pants
ID: 1465031
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

Bubblecar said:

You cricket chums like to closely guard your cricketing secrets.

Yes.

For the batting team that is a very good score. Australia were batting. Pakistan batted first (beginning yesterday) and made 240 all out. Australia have gone well beyond their score with only 1 batter out, from a possible 10.

You…you…you weren’t supposed to be divulging all this.

YOU SIGNED A NDA!!!
[/quote

Go ye into all the world and make cricket tragics of all people, teaching them about averages and the LBW law.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 19:49:04
From: party_pants
ID: 1465033
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

Bubblecar said:

You cricket chums like to closely guard your cricketing secrets.

Yes.

For the batting team that is a very good score. Australia were batting. Pakistan batted first (beginning yesterday) and made 240 all out. Australia have gone well beyond their score with only 1 batter out, from a possible 10.

You…you…you weren’t supposed to be divulging all this.

YOU SIGNED A NDA!!!

Go ye into all the world and make cricket tragics of all people, teaching them about averages and the LBW law.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 20:05:08
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1465047
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


Bubblecar said:

sibeen said:

For one of the teams.

You cricket chums like to closely guard your cricketing secrets.

Yes.

For the batting team that is a very good score. Australia were batting. Pakistan batted first (beginning yesterday) and made 240 all out. Australia have gone well beyond their score with only 1 batter out, from a possible 10.

So the Aussies are being best again. Makes up for their performance in the round ball football.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2019 20:07:30
From: party_pants
ID: 1465051
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Bubblecar said:


party_pants said:

Bubblecar said:

You cricket chums like to closely guard your cricketing secrets.

Yes.

For the batting team that is a very good score. Australia were batting. Pakistan batted first (beginning yesterday) and made 240 all out. Australia have gone well beyond their score with only 1 batter out, from a possible 10.

So the Aussies are being best again. Makes up for their performance in the round ball football.

Well, it is only a two team competition against Pakistan.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 11:54:54
From: sibeen
ID: 1465310
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Oz are 1/347. I suspect it’s going to be a very long day in the field for Pakistan.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 11:57:18
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1465312
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Oz are 1/347. I suspect it’s going to be a very long day in the field for Pakistan.

It’s not one of the great test matches.
Warner has scored 3 runs today

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 11:57:25
From: Tamb
ID: 1465313
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Oz are 1/347. I suspect it’s going to be a very long day in the field for Pakistan.

Declare in the last session & give our quicks some overs with a new ball?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 11:59:23
From: sibeen
ID: 1465314
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Tamb said:


sibeen said:

Oz are 1/347. I suspect it’s going to be a very long day in the field for Pakistan.

Declare in the last session & give our quicks some overs with a new ball?

Nah, it’s only day three. Score another 300 odd today and bat a session on the morrow.

We’ll probably have a batting collapse of epic proportions now that I’ve said all that.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 11:59:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 1465315
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Tamb said:


sibeen said:

Oz are 1/347. I suspect it’s going to be a very long day in the field for Pakistan.

Declare in the last session & give our quicks some overs with a new ball?

Nah. Take the score uop to six hunfred and give Pakistan a couple of days to try and catch up.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:00:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 1465316
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Tamb said:

sibeen said:

Oz are 1/347. I suspect it’s going to be a very long day in the field for Pakistan.

Declare in the last session & give our quicks some overs with a new ball?

Nah, it’s only day three. Score another 300 odd today and bat a session on the morrow.

We’ll probably have a batting collapse of epic proportions now that I’ve said all that.

yep.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:02:06
From: Tamb
ID: 1465317
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

roughbarked said:


sibeen said:

Tamb said:

Declare in the last session & give our quicks some overs with a new ball?

Nah, it’s only day three. Score another 300 odd today and bat a session on the morrow.

We’ll probably have a batting collapse of epic proportions now that I’ve said all that.

yep.


And the commentators will be amazed.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:02:43
From: sibeen
ID: 1465318
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Tamb said:

sibeen said:

Oz are 1/347. I suspect it’s going to be a very long day in the field for Pakistan.

Declare in the last session & give our quicks some overs with a new ball?

Nah, it’s only day three. Score another 300 odd today and bat a session on the morrow.

We’ll probably have a batting collapse of epic proportions now that I’ve said all that.

And the collapse starts:

Warner gone for 154.

Oz 2/351.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:05:38
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1465320
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

We need to take guidance from Bill Lawry on this.
Bill would set 700 as a target and then declare with Tim Pain on 99.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:12:04
From: Ian
ID: 1465322
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Oh no. Now we’ve got this twitchy young bloke.. be lucky to get to double figures

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:20:08
From: Ian
ID: 1465323
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


Oh no. Now we’ve got this twitchy young bloke.. be lucky to get to double figures

There ya go. Zip

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:21:39
From: Ian
ID: 1465324
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


Ian said:

Oh no. Now we’ve got this twitchy young bloke.. be lucky to get to double figures

There ya go. Zip 4

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:27:18
From: sibeen
ID: 1465326
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

COLLAPSE

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:30:59
From: Ian
ID: 1465328
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

I don’t think we’ll even scrape together 700

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 12:33:43
From: Ian
ID: 1465330
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Labs tonne

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 13:52:11
From: party_pants
ID: 1465339
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

3/400

what’s going on? Australia usually collapse to be all out by now after a bright start. Actually going on with it is a bit novel.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 14:54:18
From: party_pants
ID: 1465346
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Wade gone for 60.

Aus 4/468

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 14:54:49
From: sibeen
ID: 1465348
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 15:05:09
From: sibeen
ID: 1465356
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Labuschagne 150 up.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 15:27:10
From: sibeen
ID: 1465367
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

FUCK

5/506

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 15:28:34
From: party_pants
ID: 1465370
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


FUCK

5/506

We’re a bit slow on the job. But anything over 500 is good. Still 2 and a half days left to bowl them out.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 15:31:11
From: sibeen
ID: 1465371
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

FUCK

5/506

We’re a bit slow on the job. But anything over 500 is good. Still 2 and a half days left to bowl them out.

Scoring at 3.6 is a bit below par, but not by much.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 16:03:47
From: party_pants
ID: 1465386
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

300 lead up now

5/540. Time to start thinking about a declaration.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 16:05:23
From: sibeen
ID: 1465389
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


300 lead up now

5/540. Time to start thinking about a declaration.

Na.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 16:20:45
From: party_pants
ID: 1465396
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

300 lead up now

5/540. Time to start thinking about a declaration.

Na.

Seems you’re right. Marnus out for 185 and yet they bat on with the tail.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 16:48:50
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1465404
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

party_pants said:

300 lead up now

5/540. Time to start thinking about a declaration.

Na.

Seems you’re right. Marnus out for 185 and yet they bat on with the tail.

A declaration may not be necessary.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 16:50:24
From: party_pants
ID: 1465407
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Peak Warming Man said:


party_pants said:

sibeen said:

Na.

Seems you’re right. Marnus out for 185 and yet they bat on with the tail.

A declaration may not be necessary.

Well not anymore. But what, the last pair have added 20 runs in about half an hour? Seem pointless.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 16:53:04
From: Tamb
ID: 1465408
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


Peak Warming Man said:

party_pants said:

Seems you’re right. Marnus out for 185 and yet they bat on with the tail.

A declaration may not be necessary.

Well not anymore. But what, the last pair have added 20 runs in about half an hour? Seem pointless.


Waiting to get a bit closer to stumps when the light & batting conditions are not as good.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 16:54:17
From: party_pants
ID: 1465410
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

all out now 580, lead of 340.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 16:55:20
From: dv
ID: 1465411
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


300 lead up now

5/540. Time to start thinking about a declaration.

I dunno.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 16:58:12
From: sibeen
ID: 1465412
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


all out now 580, lead of 340.

I told you all that there would be a batting collapse of epic proportions.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:00:48
From: party_pants
ID: 1465413
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

all out now 580, lead of 340.

I told you all that there would be a batting collapse of epic proportions.

you is teh funny man

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:01:09
From: Tamb
ID: 1465414
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

all out now 580, lead of 340.

I told you all that there would be a batting collapse of epic proportions.


You did indeed. My alternative theory was close but yours was spot on.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:01:42
From: Ian
ID: 1465415
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

A reasonable total although the batting fell away towards the end.

And we’ll need a replacement for that Smith bloke.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:20:51
From: sibeen
ID: 1465425
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:22:46
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1465426
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Trump said in an interview with Fox News Channel that he told Chinese President Xi Jinping that crushing the protesters would have “a tremendous negative impact” on efforts to end the 16-month trade war.

“If it weren’t for me Hong Kong would have been obliterated in 14 minutes,” he said, without offering any evidence.

“He’s got a million soldiers standing outside of Hong Kong that aren’t going in only because I ask him please don’t do it, you’ll be making a big mistake, it’s going to have a tremendous negative impact on the trade deal and he wants to make a trade deal.”

… yeah right Donald.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:23:11
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1465427
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Oppps sorry

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:31:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 1465431
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

2/25

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:32:09
From: sibeen
ID: 1465433
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:39:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 1465441
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

roughbarked said:


2/25

3/25

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2019 17:41:13
From: sibeen
ID: 1465444
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Yeah…on your way then.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 11:52:36
From: sibeen
ID: 1465752
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Sorry, you’re going to have to leave the field.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 11:59:33
From: sibeen
ID: 1465756
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

You, sir, have made a duck. Now on your way, please.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 12:08:37
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1465759
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Messrs Archer and Broad are getting a bit of tap from the Kiwis.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 13:34:01
From: Ian
ID: 1465787
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

5/144 at lunch

The brave Barbar (53) is going good.

He’s a good barbar and I need a haircut… hmmm

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 13:46:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1465793
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

The Kiwis are 7/590 at tea time in their game against the Poms.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 13:49:05
From: party_pants
ID: 1465794
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


The Kiwis are 7/590 at tea time in their game against the Poms.

Heading for a draw you’d reckon, unless the poms totally collapse on the last day.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 13:55:50
From: sibeen
ID: 1465796
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

The Kiwis are 7/590 at tea time in their game against the Poms.

Heading for a draw you’d reckon, unless the poms totally collapse on the last day.

We can send thoughts and prayers.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 13:56:34
From: party_pants
ID: 1465798
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

sibeen said:

The Kiwis are 7/590 at tea time in their game against the Poms.

Heading for a draw you’d reckon, unless the poms totally collapse on the last day.

We can send thoughts and prayers.

to…?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 13:58:23
From: sibeen
ID: 1465800
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

party_pants said:

Heading for a draw you’d reckon, unless the poms totally collapse on the last day.

We can send thoughts and prayers.

to…?

precipitate an English batting collapse on the morrow.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 14:02:33
From: Tamb
ID: 1465803
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

party_pants said:

Heading for a draw you’d reckon, unless the poms totally collapse on the last day.

We can send thoughts and prayers.

to…?

God knows.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 14:02:43
From: party_pants
ID: 1465804
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

umpire’s cat

worth a review though

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 14:19:02
From: party_pants
ID: 1465812
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

kiwi have declared 9/615, lead of 262 on the first innings. I pray it is time for thoughts of an English collapse.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 14:42:24
From: party_pants
ID: 1465823
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

100 for Babar. Well played that man.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 14:43:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 1465825
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


100 for Babar. Well played that man.

Well deserved.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 14:45:49
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1465827
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

100 for Babar. Well played that man.

Well deserved.

A true Paki battler.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 15:09:44
From: Ian
ID: 1465837
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

The GOAT gets the Babar

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 15:10:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 1465838
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Ian said:


The GOAT gets the Babar

Persistance pays off.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:07:19
From: sibeen
ID: 1465881
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

England have lost a wicket. 1/49.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:23:19
From: sibeen
ID: 1465887
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


England have lost a wicket. 1/49.

And another.

2/54.

Those thoughts and prayers may be working.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:23:49
From: party_pants
ID: 1465888
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

nup, grounded the ball as he landed. not out

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:24:34
From: party_pants
ID: 1465889
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

and so says the TV ump.

good effort, but not quite.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:26:40
From: party_pants
ID: 1465890
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

seems like no bot anyway

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:26:53
From: party_pants
ID: 1465891
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

bat

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:28:00
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1465892
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


sibeen said:

England have lost a wicket. 1/49.

And another.

2/54.

Those thoughts and prayers may be working.

If Kiwis support NZ, and whoever is playing Australia, how come Australians don’t return the honour?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:31:38
From: party_pants
ID: 1465893
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

The Rev Dodgson said:


sibeen said:

sibeen said:

England have lost a wicket. 1/49.

And another.

2/54.

Those thoughts and prayers may be working.

If Kiwis support NZ, and whoever is playing Australia, how come Australians don’t return the honour?

we support whoever is playing England.

It is an example of unrequited rivalry in sports. For example England see Germany as their biggest rivals in international soccer, but the Germans don’t care to much about England, they see the Netherlands as their key rival and beating them matters more. Australian soccer fans see Japan as big rivals, but the Japanese don’t give a fuck.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:32:03
From: sibeen
ID: 1465894
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


sibeen said:

England have lost a wicket. 1/49.

And another.

2/54.

Those thoughts and prayers may be working.

Ooooo, another.

3/55.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:32:38
From: sibeen
ID: 1465895
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

And Pakistan also lose a wicket. 7/305.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:32:56
From: party_pants
ID: 1465896
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

fuck off

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:34:48
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1465897
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


sibeen said:

England have lost a wicket. 1/49.

And another.

2/54.

Those thoughts and prayers may be working.

I tell ya…………….

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:55:19
From: monkey skipper
ID: 1465901
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


fuck off

isn’t that sibeen’s usual comment in the sporting threads?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 16:57:39
From: sibeen
ID: 1465903
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Off you go, then.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 17:00:41
From: sibeen
ID: 1465908
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

And that’s it.

Oz win by an innings and 5 runs.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 17:01:46
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1465910
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


And that’s it.

Oz win by an innings and 5 runs.

I hope we’re only playing 3 tests against these rabble.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 17:02:11
From: Ian
ID: 1465911
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

That’s that.

Imran Khan was always rubbish.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 17:09:32
From: party_pants
ID: 1465914
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

I like Isa.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 17:42:56
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1465923
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


I like Isa.

It’s a shithole.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 17:50:24
From: party_pants
ID: 1465927
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Peak Warming Man said:


party_pants said:

I like Isa.

It’s a shithole.

I’d still mount it.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2019 17:50:47
From: dv
ID: 1465928
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

party_pants said:


Peak Warming Man said:

party_pants said:

I like Isa.

It’s a shithole.

I’d still mount it.

it means Jesus

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 10:10:17
From: sibeen
ID: 1466145
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Root has gone.

Eng 4/74

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 12:21:28
From: sibeen
ID: 1466165
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Stokes out.

Eng 5/121

thoughts and prayers

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 12:49:26
From: sibeen
ID: 1466179
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Denly gone.

Eng 6/132

thoughts and prayers

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 12:50:57
From: party_pants
ID: 1466181
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Denly gone.

Eng 6/132

thoughts and prayers

stay on target NZ …
Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 12:56:31
From: sibeen
ID: 1466184
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Pope gone.

Eng 7/133

thoughts and prayers

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 13:13:56
From: sibeen
ID: 1466199
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Buttler away

Eng 8/138

thoughts and prayers

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 13:16:10
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1466201
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Buttler away

Eng 8/138

thoughts and prayers

Lovely.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 13:21:57
From: Michael V
ID: 1466209
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


Buttler away

Eng 8/138

thoughts and prayers

G’dona, SloMo.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 14:06:18
From: sibeen
ID: 1466241
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

England need to survive 32 overs in the last session with two wickets in hand.

thoughts and prayers

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 14:44:29
From: sibeen
ID: 1466253
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

Archer gone.

9/197

thoughts and prayers

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 14:47:22
From: sibeen
ID: 1466254
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

And it looks like thoughts and prayers are the winner. England all out for 197.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 14:53:51
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1466255
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


And it looks like thoughts and prayers are the winner. England all out for 197.

Oh what a shame.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2019 15:19:20
From: party_pants
ID: 1466259
Subject: re: First Test: Aus vs Pak

sibeen said:


And it looks like thoughts and prayers are the winner. England all out for 197.

that’s some might fine T & Ps you got going there shebs :)

Reply Quote