I bought myself a new book.. it is Lombroso’s “Criminal Women, The Prostitute and the Normal Woman”.

Lombroso is considered to be the “Father of Criminology”, he espoused the idea that criminals are born and that they could be identified through their features.

To Lombroso, women were either marryable, fuckable or criminal… which translates to Good looking, ok looking but wouldn’t marry them, or ugly)

He was a bit of a dick… but here are some fun passages that I have prepared earlier..

Arts said:

I bought myself a new book.. it is Lombroso’s “Criminal Women, The Prostitute and the Normal Woman”.

Lombroso is considered to be the “Father of Criminology”, he espoused the idea that criminals are born and that they could be identified through their features.

To Lombroso, women were either marryable, fuckable or criminal… which translates to Good looking, ok looking but wouldn’t marry them, or ugly)

He was a bit of a dick… but here are some fun passages that I have prepared earlier..

chuckle, don’t mind me

Arts said:

I bought myself a new book.. it is Lombroso’s “Criminal Women, The Prostitute and the Normal Woman”.

Lombroso is considered to be the “Father of Criminology”, he espoused the idea that criminals are born and that they could be identified through their features.

To Lombroso, women were either marryable, fuckable or criminal… which translates to Good looking, ok looking but wouldn’t marry them, or ugly)

He was a bit of a dick… but here are some fun passages that I have prepared earlier..

All seems fairly scientific. As long as it passes peer review I’m OK with it.

He’d be fun at a dinner party. I’d seat him right next to Prince Andrew.

sibeen said:

Arts said:

I bought myself a new book.. it is Lombroso’s “Criminal Women, The Prostitute and the Normal Woman”.

Lombroso is considered to be the “Father of Criminology”, he espoused the idea that criminals are born and that they could be identified through their features.

To Lombroso, women were either marryable, fuckable or criminal… which translates to Good looking, ok looking but wouldn’t marry them, or ugly)

He was a bit of a dick… but here are some fun passages that I have prepared earlier..

All seems fairly scientific. As long as it passes peer review I’m OK with it.

I don’t know if it was scientific or merely an exercise in correlation.

He’s got a little bit of an agenda there, i think.

Hairiness. I got a laugh out of that one.

By the way Arts, I finished reading The Nature of Life and Death by the forensic ecologist. It was an easy read, part biography, part interesting details about placing a body in “place” and placing suspects at scenes.

How did they gather data on “normals”?

buffy said:

Hairiness. I got a laugh out of that one.

By the way Arts, I finished reading The Nature of Life and Death by the forensic ecologist. It was an easy read, part biography, part interesting details about placing a body in “place” and placing suspects at scenes.

what was the name again?

party_pants said:

How did they gather data on “normals”?

normals were probably those who did not fit into the other categories…

Arts said:

party_pants said:

How did they gather data on “normals”?

normals were probably those who did not fit into the other categories…

that’s me, a normal.

Boris said:

Arts said:

party_pants said:

How did they gather data on “normals”?

normals were probably those who did not fit into the other categories…

that’s me, a normal.

The book is about women, you know…

Boris said:

Arts said:

party_pants said:

How did they gather data on “normals”?

normals were probably those who did not fit into the other categories…

that’s me, a normal.

never get away with calling a research group normals these days, you’d have to make up a name using a bigger word.

furious said:

Boris said:

Arts said:

normals were probably those who did not fit into the other categories…

that’s me, a normal.

The book is about women, you know…

i am in touch with my feminine side you know!

furious said:

Boris said:

Arts said:

normals were probably those who did not fit into the other categories…

that’s me, a normal.

The book is about women, you know…

he does one about men too.. I will get that one when I have finished reading this one… just to be fair.

• never get away with calling a research group normals these days, you’d have to make up a name using a bigger word.

The internet tells me it was originally called:

La Donna Delinquente: La prostituta e la donna normale (1893)

Arts said:

buffy said:

Hairiness. I got a laugh out of that one.

By the way Arts, I finished reading The Nature of Life and Death by the forensic ecologist. It was an easy read, part biography, part interesting details about placing a body in “place” and placing suspects at scenes.

what was the name again?

Patricia Wiltshire

buffy said:

Arts said:

buffy said:

Hairiness. I got a laugh out of that one.

By the way Arts, I finished reading The Nature of Life and Death by the forensic ecologist. It was an easy read, part biography, part interesting details about placing a body in “place” and placing suspects at scenes.

what was the name again?

Patricia Wiltshire

ah yes, thank you.

There is quite a lot of speculation on the angel / whore dichotomy in feminist literature, as you might be aware. They make great sport of it.

Arts said:

Date, date, date. Give me a date.

mollwollfumble said:

Arts said:

Date, date, date. Give me a date.

The bo9 was originally published in 1893

Arts said:

mollwollfumble said:

Arts said:

Date, date, date. Give me a date.

The bo9 was originally published in 1893

Thanks.