I could spoil you with convenience, turn it all on, and the territory of potential inconvenience silently expands too

you won’t see the latter because of the former, you might be inclined to resist seeing the latter because the forces of hope and promise for convenience are so overwhelming, so instead deflect or steer the reality of potential inconvenience elsewhere. There exists contradictions, paradoxical aspects

the expectation and living the convenience becomes core of your ego

probably a good way to drive motivational theory into egoism, I was going to say toward egoism, but I think it goes all the way, very effectively

transition said:

I could spoil you with convenience, turn it all on, and the territory of potential inconvenience silently expands too

you won’t see the latter because of the former, you might be inclined to resist seeing the latter because the forces of hope and promise for convenience are so overwhelming, so instead deflect or steer the reality of potential inconvenience elsewhere. There exists contradictions, paradoxical aspects

the expectation and living the convenience becomes core of your ego

probably a good way to drive motivational theory into egoism, I was going to say toward egoism, but I think it goes all the way, very effectively

> convenience, turn it all on, and the territory of potential inconvenience silently expands too. you won’t see the latter because of the former

For recent discussion of inconvenience generated by convenience, see the “Is it always like this?” thread.

> the expectation and living the convenience becomes core of your ego

Particularly for those who believe that there are such things as “human rights”. I don’t think there are any such things as “rights”, only privileges that we’ve grown overly comfortable with.