I could laugh which I did, Then I thought, she’s serious.
Pauline….
So how do we stop TV from allowing stupid people to speak?
What she say?
captain_spalding said:
What she say?
You missed it?
Anyway She who Must Be Listened to Even Though we’s Rather Not. wants school teachers to stop teaching facts.
roughbarked said:
I could laugh which I did, Then I thought, she’s serious.
Pauline….
So how do we stop TV from allowing stupid people to speak?
That seems like a bad idea
roughbarked said:
I could laugh which I did, Then I thought, she’s serious.
Pauline….
So how do we stop TV from allowing stupid people to speak?
Stop Stupid Politicians!
dv said:
roughbarked said:
I could laugh which I did, Then I thought, she’s serious.
Pauline….
So how do we stop TV from allowing stupid people to speak?
That seems like a bad idea
Yes. Of course it is. My TV must have been on WIN as it was on the Today show with PH having her stupid speak.
Usually avoid tuning in. It was an accident.
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
I could laugh which I did, Then I thought, she’s serious.
Pauline….
So how do we stop TV from allowing stupid people to speak?
Stop Stupid Politicians!
Unfortunately free speech means that it is a bit like: we can’t trust atoms because they make stuff up.
my crystal ball’s broken, what’s the subject
transition said:
my crystal ball’s broken, what’s the subject
transition said:
my crystal ball’s broken, what’s the subject
It would seem to be this (from Hanson’s site):
“Skewed versions of history and science, and sexualised school programs that indoctrinate young children with controversies like gender fluidity, are among the targets of a groundbreaking private Bill to be tabled this week by One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson.
Senator Hanson will table the Private Senator’s Bill on Monday to force any contentious school curricula to be balanced.
“Children are easy targets of all sorts of false and left-leaning teachings and parents have had a gut full of seeing the people they entrust with teaching their children, pushing their own agendas,” Senator Hanson said.
“Children should be given balanced information, including views about political, historic and scientific matters, and they should be very strongly encouraged to think critically about what they are told and learn to make up their own informed views.
“When children graduate from school, they need skills in historic research and scientific thinking, which will support them throughout their lives.”
The Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children Bill would counteract a wide range of issues described as indoctrination of young children: including skewed versions of history taught as fact, controversial sexual programs that teach gender fluidity and realignment to infants, unsubstantiated human-induced climate change, as well as the teachings of so-called “safe” underage sex, sexting, and non-traditional sex.
“The Bill recognises parents across Australia who have concerns about biased teachings, they don’t like the teaching of non-traditional and controversial views that don’t give the full picture; they want to protect and strengthen their children, and this Bill does that,” Senator Hanson said.
“Parents want a sensible curriculum that sets their children up for meaningful, employable futures, without the distraction of false or imbalanced ideology.”
The Bill notes that a growing number of teachers may hold biased views that can be passed on to their students, and ensures that resources that promote a balanced presentation of opposing views on political, historical and scientific issues are provided to the teaching profession.
The Bill also links the payment of Commonwealth education funding to state and territories to the satisfactory teaching of a balanced curriculum and also requires schools to liaise with parents to let them know the extent to which students are provided with a balanced presentation of opposing views.
The Australian Education Legislation Amendment (Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children) Bill 2020 is expected to be presented to the Senate in the second week of February, 2020.”
The Rev Dodgson said:
transition said:
my crystal ball’s broken, what’s the subject
It would seem to be this (from Hanson’s site):
“Skewed versions of history and science, and sexualised school programs that indoctrinate young children with controversies like gender fluidity, are among the targets of a groundbreaking private Bill to be tabled this week by One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson.
Senator Hanson will table the Private Senator’s Bill on Monday to force any contentious school curricula to be balanced.
“Children are easy targets of all sorts of false and left-leaning teachings and parents have had a gut full of seeing the people they entrust with teaching their children, pushing their own agendas,” Senator Hanson said.
“Children should be given balanced information, including views about political, historic and scientific matters, and they should be very strongly encouraged to think critically about what they are told and learn to make up their own informed views.
“When children graduate from school, they need skills in historic research and scientific thinking, which will support them throughout their lives.”
The Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children Bill would counteract a wide range of issues described as indoctrination of young children: including skewed versions of history taught as fact, controversial sexual programs that teach gender fluidity and realignment to infants, unsubstantiated human-induced climate change, as well as the teachings of so-called “safe” underage sex, sexting, and non-traditional sex.
“The Bill recognises parents across Australia who have concerns about biased teachings, they don’t like the teaching of non-traditional and controversial views that don’t give the full picture; they want to protect and strengthen their children, and this Bill does that,” Senator Hanson said.
“Parents want a sensible curriculum that sets their children up for meaningful, employable futures, without the distraction of false or imbalanced ideology.”
The Bill notes that a growing number of teachers may hold biased views that can be passed on to their students, and ensures that resources that promote a balanced presentation of opposing views on political, historical and scientific issues are provided to the teaching profession.
The Bill also links the payment of Commonwealth education funding to state and territories to the satisfactory teaching of a balanced curriculum and also requires schools to liaise with parents to let them know the extent to which students are provided with a balanced presentation of opposing views.
The Australian Education Legislation Amendment (Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children) Bill 2020 is expected to be presented to the Senate in the second week of February, 2020.”
She seems to be on the right track (for a change)
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
transition said:
my crystal ball’s broken, what’s the subject
It would seem to be this (from Hanson’s site):
She seems to be on the right track (for a change)
I very much doubt it.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:It would seem to be this (from Hanson’s site):
She seems to be on the right track (for a change)
I very much doubt it.
ON TV she said politics before facts. I’m sure they were her words.
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
transition said:
my crystal ball’s broken, what’s the subject
It would seem to be this (from Hanson’s site):
“Skewed versions of history and science, and sexualised school programs that indoctrinate young children with controversies like gender fluidity, are among the targets of a groundbreaking private Bill to be tabled this week by One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson.
Senator Hanson will table the Private Senator’s Bill on Monday to force any contentious school curricula to be balanced.
“Children are easy targets of all sorts of false and left-leaning teachings and parents have had a gut full of seeing the people they entrust with teaching their children, pushing their own agendas,” Senator Hanson said.
“Children should be given balanced information, including views about political, historic and scientific matters, and they should be very strongly encouraged to think critically about what they are told and learn to make up their own informed views.
“When children graduate from school, they need skills in historic research and scientific thinking, which will support them throughout their lives.”
The Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children Bill would counteract a wide range of issues described as indoctrination of young children: including skewed versions of history taught as fact, controversial sexual programs that teach gender fluidity and realignment to infants, unsubstantiated human-induced climate change, as well as the teachings of so-called “safe” underage sex, sexting, and non-traditional sex.
“The Bill recognises parents across Australia who have concerns about biased teachings, they don’t like the teaching of non-traditional and controversial views that don’t give the full picture; they want to protect and strengthen their children, and this Bill does that,” Senator Hanson said.
“Parents want a sensible curriculum that sets their children up for meaningful, employable futures, without the distraction of false or imbalanced ideology.”
The Bill notes that a growing number of teachers may hold biased views that can be passed on to their students, and ensures that resources that promote a balanced presentation of opposing views on political, historical and scientific issues are provided to the teaching profession.
The Bill also links the payment of Commonwealth education funding to state and territories to the satisfactory teaching of a balanced curriculum and also requires schools to liaise with parents to let them know the extent to which students are provided with a balanced presentation of opposing views.
The Australian Education Legislation Amendment (Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children) Bill 2020 is expected to be presented to the Senate in the second week of February, 2020.”
She seems to be on the right track (for a change)
LOL, no. She hasn’t a clue what teachers teach. Some of what she says is exactly what is already being taught. Left leaning says it all.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:It would seem to be this (from Hanson’s site):
She seems to be on the right track (for a change)
I very much doubt it.
The Rev Dodgson said:
transition said:
my crystal ball’s broken, what’s the subject
It would seem to be this (from Hanson’s site):
“Skewed versions of history and science, and sexualised school programs that indoctrinate young children with controversies like gender fluidity, are among the targets of a groundbreaking private Bill to be tabled this week by One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson.
Senator Hanson will table the Private Senator’s Bill on Monday to force any contentious school curricula to be balanced.
“Children are easy targets of all sorts of false and left-leaning teachings and parents have had a gut full of seeing the people they entrust with teaching their children, pushing their own agendas,” Senator Hanson said.
“Children should be given balanced information, including views about political, historic and scientific matters, and they should be very strongly encouraged to think critically about what they are told and learn to make up their own informed views.
“When children graduate from school, they need skills in historic research and scientific thinking, which will support them throughout their lives.”
The Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children Bill would counteract a wide range of issues described as indoctrination of young children: including skewed versions of history taught as fact, controversial sexual programs that teach gender fluidity and realignment to infants, unsubstantiated human-induced climate change, as well as the teachings of so-called “safe” underage sex, sexting, and non-traditional sex.
“The Bill recognises parents across Australia who have concerns about biased teachings, they don’t like the teaching of non-traditional and controversial views that don’t give the full picture; they want to protect and strengthen their children, and this Bill does that,” Senator Hanson said.
“Parents want a sensible curriculum that sets their children up for meaningful, employable futures, without the distraction of false or imbalanced ideology.”
The Bill notes that a growing number of teachers may hold biased views that can be passed on to their students, and ensures that resources that promote a balanced presentation of opposing views on political, historical and scientific issues are provided to the teaching profession.
The Bill also links the payment of Commonwealth education funding to state and territories to the satisfactory teaching of a balanced curriculum and also requires schools to liaise with parents to let them know the extent to which students are provided with a balanced presentation of opposing views.
The Australian Education Legislation Amendment (Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children) Bill 2020 is expected to be presented to the Senate in the second week of February, 2020.”
thanks, rev
no comment
>>>pushing their own agendas.
Isn’t that what Pauline is doing ?
Tau.Neutrino said:
>>>pushing their own agendas.Isn’t that what Pauline is doing ?
descended of strange times, a time when both the idea of a human nature and cultural determinism were influential, that’s amplified nurture and nature together, a historical ideological battleground, they swung out of the trees, walked the savanna, convinced by the extended view from their uprightness, wanted for more uprightness. It wasn’t enough they could see over the rises, over the foliage, see danger coming, no
ChrispenEvan said:
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:It would seem to be this (from Hanson’s site):
“Skewed versions of history and science, and sexualised school programs that indoctrinate young children with controversies like gender fluidity, are among the targets of a groundbreaking private Bill to be tabled this week by One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson.
Senator Hanson will table the Private Senator’s Bill on Monday to force any contentious school curricula to be balanced.
“Children are easy targets of all sorts of false and left-leaning teachings and parents have had a gut full of seeing the people they entrust with teaching their children, pushing their own agendas,” Senator Hanson said.
“Children should be given balanced information, including views about political, historic and scientific matters, and they should be very strongly encouraged to think critically about what they are told and learn to make up their own informed views.
“When children graduate from school, they need skills in historic research and scientific thinking, which will support them throughout their lives.”
The Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children Bill would counteract a wide range of issues described as indoctrination of young children: including skewed versions of history taught as fact, controversial sexual programs that teach gender fluidity and realignment to infants, unsubstantiated human-induced climate change, as well as the teachings of so-called “safe” underage sex, sexting, and non-traditional sex.
“The Bill recognises parents across Australia who have concerns about biased teachings, they don’t like the teaching of non-traditional and controversial views that don’t give the full picture; they want to protect and strengthen their children, and this Bill does that,” Senator Hanson said.
“Parents want a sensible curriculum that sets their children up for meaningful, employable futures, without the distraction of false or imbalanced ideology.”
The Bill notes that a growing number of teachers may hold biased views that can be passed on to their students, and ensures that resources that promote a balanced presentation of opposing views on political, historical and scientific issues are provided to the teaching profession.
The Bill also links the payment of Commonwealth education funding to state and territories to the satisfactory teaching of a balanced curriculum and also requires schools to liaise with parents to let them know the extent to which students are provided with a balanced presentation of opposing views.
The Australian Education Legislation Amendment (Prohibiting the Indoctrination of Children) Bill 2020 is expected to be presented to the Senate in the second week of February, 2020.”
She seems to be on the right track (for a change)
LOL, no. She hasn’t a clue what teachers teach. Some of what she says is exactly what is already being taught. Left leaning says it all.
Ploise explain how this is leftist.
sarahs mum said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Tamb said:She seems to be on the right track (for a change)
LOL, no. She hasn’t a clue what teachers teach. Some of what she says is exactly what is already being taught. Left leaning says it all.
Ploise explain how this is leftist.
I was commenting on this sentence by hanson
“Children are easy targets of all sorts of false and left-leaning teachings and parents have had a gut full of seeing the people they entrust with teaching their children, pushing their own agendas,” Senator Hanson said.
sarahs mum said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Tamb said:She seems to be on the right track (for a change)
LOL, no. She hasn’t a clue what teachers teach. Some of what she says is exactly what is already being taught. Left leaning says it all.
Ploise explain how this is leftist.
When you’re as right-wing extremist as Pauline the sensible centre is considered leftist.
ChrispenEvan said:
sarahs mum said:
ChrispenEvan said:LOL, no. She hasn’t a clue what teachers teach. Some of what she says is exactly what is already being taught. Left leaning says it all.
Ploise explain how this is leftist.
I was commenting on this sentence by hanson
“Children are easy targets of all sorts of false and left-leaning teachings and parents have had a gut full of seeing the people they entrust with teaching their children, pushing their own agendas,” Senator Hanson said.
Okay. Carry on.
ChrispenEvan said:
I was commenting on this sentence by hanson
“Children are easy targets of all sorts of false and left-leaning teachings and parents have had a gut full of seeing the people they entrust with teaching their children, pushing their own agendas,” Senator Hanson said.
Because parents are so good at keeping their biases, prejudices and agendas to themselves.
Wouldn’t Pauline version of history omit anything that paints white settlers and subsequent government policies in relation to Aboriginal as bad.
Not sure about the underage sex stuff, is that even true ?
Gender fluidity who cares it’s no one business anyway are they worried its going to become some sort of fad with interchangeable genitals and you can be a man one day and a women the next.
Even if what I mentioned above does happen (highly unlikely) one again who cares its not really hurting anyone and traditional gender roles and subjugation of women aren’t something we what to encourage anyway
ChrispenEvan said:
sarahs mum said:
ChrispenEvan said:LOL, no. She hasn’t a clue what teachers teach. Some of what she says is exactly what is already being taught. Left leaning says it all.
Ploise explain how this is leftist.
I was commenting on this sentence by hanson
“Children are easy targets of all sorts of false and left-leaning teachings and parents have had a gut full of seeing the people they entrust with teaching their children, pushing their own agendas,” Senator Hanson said.
You could apply that to religion and racist, sexist, bigoted nonsense she holds dear
The curriculum is a state issue, she has no jurisdiction in this area.
Peak Warming Man said:
The curriculum is a state issue, she has no jurisdiction in this area.
Peak Warming Man said:
The curriculum is a state issue, she has no jurisdiction in this area.
The Federal government provide much of the funding for education, especially in private schools.
is this discussion worth entering
party_pants said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The curriculum is a state issue, she has no jurisdiction in this area.The Federal government provide much of the funding for education, especially in private schools.
It should be Federal.
roughbarked said:
I could laugh which I did, Then I thought, she’s serious.
Pauline….
So how do we stop TV from allowing stupid people to speak?
By ignoring them. TV keeps a list of people that can be relied upon to express extreme opinions, and calls them up whenever it wants to anger the TV audience.
Don’t feed the trolls. That’s all it takes.
SCIENCE said:
is this discussion worth entering
mollwollfumble said:
roughbarked said:
I could laugh which I did, Then I thought, she’s serious.
Pauline….
So how do we stop TV from allowing stupid people to speak?
By ignoring them. TV keeps a list of people that can be relied upon to express extreme opinions, and calls them up whenever it wants to anger the TV audience.
Don’t feed the trolls. That’s all it takes.
Pretty much really
Politicians for the most part are all conservatives that want to maintain their version of the status quo and begrudgingly accept change as long as its not too scary or different.
Pauline is really just a bogan with outdated ideals
Tamb said:
party_pants said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The curriculum is a state issue, she has no jurisdiction in this area.The Federal government provide much of the funding for education, especially in private schools.
It should be Federal.
Nah, we prefer to teach the laws of maths and physics as they apply in WA, not to the rest of the nation.
Tamb said:
SCIENCE said:
is this discussion worth entering
No. I tried & didn’t like it.
cheers laters
SCIENCE said:
Tamb said:
SCIENCE said:
is this discussion worth entering
No. I tried & didn’t like it.cheers laters
actually no wait i found the solution
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-10/top-teachers-should-train-juniors—grattan-institute-report-says/11948246
Top teachers should train their junior colleagues, fixed Grattan Institute report suggests
The report puts forward a new model that would see top-performing teachers train their more junior colleagues
they have suggested creating two new jobs in both primary and secondary schools
The first would be “instructional specialists” who would still spend 50-70 per cent of their time teaching
To train that group, there would then be a higher tier of “master teachers”,
The master teachers would not have a classroom of their own but would demonstrate lessons, observe and promote government policies
There would be high standards for selection and both roles would be filled by teachers who had the right kind of ideological backing
The jobs would also come with an indecent pay rise comparable to a sports grant or Great Barrel Reef Foundation for Pork.
“Money’s not the issue — it’s about political will and corruption,” he said.SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
Tamb said:No. I tried & didn’t like it.
cheers laters
actually no wait i found the solution
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-10/top-teachers-should-train-juniors—grattan-institute-report-says/11948246
Top teachers should train their junior colleagues, fixed Grattan Institute report suggests
The report puts forward a new model that would see top-performing teachers train their more junior colleagues
they have suggested creating two new jobs in both primary and secondary schools
The first would be “instructional specialists” who would still spend 50-70 per cent of their time teaching
To train that group, there would then be a higher tier of “master teachers”,
The master teachers would not have a classroom of their own but would demonstrate lessons, observe and promote government policies
There would be high standards for selection and both roles would be filled by teachers who had the right kind of ideological backing
The jobs would also come with an indecent pay rise comparable to a sports grant or Great Barrel Reef Foundation for Pork.
“Money’s not the issue — it’s about political will and corruption,” he said.
Could the schools be sponsored by a large corporation say McDonalds, a mining company, or even the military industrial complex and just make the students good worker drones that don’t question or desire
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
Tamb said:No. I tried & didn’t like it.
cheers laters
actually no wait i found the solution
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-10/top-teachers-should-train-juniors—grattan-institute-report-says/11948246
Top teachers should train their junior colleagues, fixed Grattan Institute report suggests
The report puts forward a new model that would see top-performing teachers train their more junior colleagues
they have suggested creating two new jobs in both primary and secondary schools
The first would be “instructional specialists” who would still spend 50-70 per cent of their time teaching
To train that group, there would then be a higher tier of “master teachers”,
The master teachers would not have a classroom of their own but would demonstrate lessons, observe and promote government policies
There would be high standards for selection and both roles would be filled by teachers who had the right kind of ideological backing
The jobs would also come with an indecent pay rise comparable to a sports grant or Great Barrel Reef Foundation for Pork.
“Money’s not the issue — it’s about political will and corruption,” he said.
They used to have School Inspectors but the teachers union got rid of that.
Peak Warming Man said:
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:cheers laters
actually no wait i found the solution
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-10/top-teachers-should-train-juniors—grattan-institute-report-says/11948246
Top teachers should train their junior colleagues, fixed Grattan Institute report suggests
The report puts forward a new model that would see top-performing teachers train their more junior colleagues
they have suggested creating two new jobs in both primary and secondary schools
The first would be “instructional specialists” who would still spend 50-70 per cent of their time teaching
To train that group, there would then be a higher tier of “master teachers”,
The master teachers would not have a classroom of their own but would demonstrate lessons, observe and promote government policies
There would be high standards for selection and both roles would be filled by teachers who had the right kind of ideological backing
The jobs would also come with an indecent pay rise comparable to a sports grant or Great Barrel Reef Foundation for Pork.
“Money’s not the issue — it’s about political will and corruption,” he said.They used to have School Inspectors but the teachers union got rid of that.
You’ll need a reference for that statement.
Pauline Hanson pushes her own agendas, she is stupid, destructive, and unproductive, a waste of taxpayers money !
Tau.Neutrino said:
Pauline Hanson pushes her own agendas, she is stupid, destructive, and unproductive, a waste of taxpayers money !
Tamb said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Pauline Hanson pushes her own agendas, she is stupid, destructive, and unproductive, a waste of taxpayers money !
She is not alone.
Plenty more where that one came from.
Tamb said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Pauline Hanson pushes her own agendas, she is stupid, destructive, and unproductive, a waste of taxpayers money !
She is not alone.
The is a strong contingent of federal politicians wasting taxpayers money.
We need higher standards in in federal politics.
A TAFE course covering all the usual political subjects with either a competent pass or fail.
The = There.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tamb said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Pauline Hanson pushes her own agendas, she is stupid, destructive, and unproductive, a waste of taxpayers money !
She is not alone.The is a strong contingent of federal politicians wasting taxpayers money.
We need higher standards in in federal politics.
A TAFE course covering all the usual political subjects with either a competent pass or fail.
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tamb said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Pauline Hanson pushes her own agendas, she is stupid, destructive, and unproductive, a waste of taxpayers money !
She is not alone.The is a strong contingent of federal politicians wasting taxpayers money.
We need higher standards in in federal politics.
A TAFE course covering all the usual political subjects with either a competent pass or fail.
Most MPs have a uni degree. It’s not that they don’t know, it’s that they don’t care.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tamb said:She is not alone.
The is a strong contingent of federal politicians wasting taxpayers money.
We need higher standards in in federal politics.
A TAFE course covering all the usual political subjects with either a competent pass or fail.
Most MPs have a uni degree. It’s not that they don’t know, it’s that they don’t care.
Pauline Hanson doesn’t know.
PermeateFree said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Tau.Neutrino said:The is a strong contingent of federal politicians wasting taxpayers money.
We need higher standards in in federal politics.
A TAFE course covering all the usual political subjects with either a competent pass or fail.
Most MPs have a uni degree. It’s not that they don’t know, it’s that they don’t care.
Pauline Hanson doesn’t know.
Probably why she has a problem keeping her pants up and killing shopping trolleys
PermeateFree said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Tau.Neutrino said:The is a strong contingent of federal politicians wasting taxpayers money.
We need higher standards in in federal politics.
A TAFE course covering all the usual political subjects with either a competent pass or fail.
Most MPs have a uni degree. It’s not that they don’t know, it’s that they don’t care.
Pauline Hanson doesn’t know.
Top women Pauline Hanson says what needs to be said
Not much of a looker though
The-Spectator said:
PermeateFree said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Most MPs have a uni degree. It’s not that they don’t know, it’s that they don’t care.
Pauline Hanson doesn’t know.
Top women Pauline Hanson says what needs to be said
Not much of a looker though
SO we shouldn’t listen to ugly people then?
The-Spectator said:
PermeateFree said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Most MPs have a uni degree. It’s not that they don’t know, it’s that they don’t care.
Pauline Hanson doesn’t know.
Top women Pauline Hanson says what needs to be said
Not much of a looker though
She speaks for all loonies.
The-Spectator said:
PermeateFree said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Most MPs have a uni degree. It’s not that they don’t know, it’s that they don’t care.
Pauline Hanson doesn’t know.
Top women Pauline Hanson says what needs to be said
Not much of a looker though
Top women Pauline Hanson ?
There’s more than one of them ?
Tau.Neutrino said:
The-Spectator said:
PermeateFree said:Pauline Hanson doesn’t know.
Top women Pauline Hanson says what needs to be said
Not much of a looker though
Top women Pauline Hanson ?
There’s more than one of them ?
I wish that would be a sexual fantasy of mine
The-Spectator said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The-Spectator said:Top women Pauline Hanson says what needs to be said
Not much of a looker though
Top women Pauline Hanson ?
There’s more than one of them ?
I wish that would be a sexual fantasy of mine
Runs away screaming.
The-Spectator said:
PermeateFree said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Most MPs have a uni degree. It’s not that they don’t know, it’s that they don’t care.
Pauline Hanson doesn’t know.
Top women Pauline Hanson says what needs to be said
Not much of a looker though
Which Top Women?
Pauline says what she thinks. Which usually is a pile of foul fish and chips.
The-Spectator said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The-Spectator said:Top women Pauline Hanson says what needs to be said
Not much of a looker though
Top women Pauline Hanson ?
There’s more than one of them ?
I wish that would be a sexual fantasy of mine
So you like them ugly and with two heads?