furious said:
And X too, while you’re at it…
I have a book about spelling reform here by a correspondent of mine. I’ll see if I can find it. No, I must have archived it. The book is “Lindgren, Harry. Spelling Reform: A New Approach. Alpha Books, 1969.”
It does have a wikipedia entry. “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SR1” But this wikipedia entry is only for Stage 1 of a five stage spelling reform. Later stages abolish Q, X, C, Y etc. Another example I like is using “Hansm” for “Handsome”
Here’s a poem about the reform of the letter “e”
Draw a breth for progress,
Tred abrest ahed.
Fight agenst old spelling,
Better “red” than “read”.
Spred the words at brekfast,
Mesure them in bed,
Dream of welth and tresure,
Better “ded” than “dead”.
Stage 1:
Reform E (see above)
PH to F
Drop GH, eg. Laugh to Laf, Through to Thru
Phonetic A “http://runeberg.org/authors/lindghas.html” includes in summary
pa’m fe’ri li’n ho’l fu’ri muun
> palm fairy lean haul furry moon
dai lei koi hau lou
> die lay coy how low
dair leir koir our lour
> dire layer coir our lower
knaiv hrou’k fnetk horr of’sr of’s‘rz
> connive heroic phonetic horror officer officers
gramr sistr martr kulr hansm litl
> grammar sister martyr colour handsome little
en-geij lait-haus caild-hood
> engage lighthouse childhood
A sample of Phonetic A:
Hi hth disgreist mi, ‘nd hind’rd mi ha’f ‘milyn, la’ft ‘t mai losz, mokt ‘t mai geinz, skornd mai neishn, thwortd mai barg’nz, kuuld mai frendz, hi’td mai en’miz; ‘nd wots hiz ri’zn? Ai’m ‘Juu. Hath not ‘Juu aiz? hath not ‘Juu handz, org’nz, dmensh’nz, ‘feksh’nz, pash’nz? fed with dh’ seim fuud, hurt with dh’ seim wep’nz, subj’kt t’ dh’ seim disi’zz, hi’ld bai dh’ sem mi’nz, wormd ‘n kuuld bai dh’seim wintr ‘nd sumr, ‘z ‘Krsityn iz?
I’ve also seen a hilarious send-up of spelling reform. Here is is, from https://www.smart-jokes.org/english-spelling-reform.html Also more jokes about spelling reform on that web page.
A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter “c” would be dropped to be replased either by “k” or “s,” and likewise “x” would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which “c” would be retained would be the “ch” formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform “w” spelling, so that “which” and “one” would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish “y” replasing it with “i” and Iear 4 might fiks the “g/j” anomali wonse and for all.
Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez “c,” “y” and “x”—bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez—tu riplais “ch,” “sh,” and “th” rispektivli.
Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe ingliy-spiking werld.