Date: 24/02/2020 13:38:03
From: party_pants
ID: 1504832
Subject: Abolish Q

Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:41:07
From: furious
ID: 1504833
Subject: re: Abolish Q

And X too, while you’re at it…

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:44:10
From: sibeen
ID: 1504836
Subject: re: Abolish Q

party_pants said:


Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

Qantas :)

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:44:48
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1504837
Subject: re: Abolish Q

party_pants said:


Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

Quran

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:46:25
From: furious
ID: 1504838
Subject: re: Abolish Q

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

Qantas :)

Well, change Qu to Kw then Qantas becomes Kantas…

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:49:21
From: furious
ID: 1504840
Subject: re: Abolish Q

The Rev Dodgson said:


party_pants said:

Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

Quran

I do not know the correct pronunciation of that but it is often referred to as Koran. Besides, it is a non english word and may not be relevant to a discussion about the english alphabet…

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:53:15
From: fsm
ID: 1504844
Subject: re: Abolish Q

party_pants said:


Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

Here are a few examples…

antique
liquor
physique
picturesque
unique
mosquito
technique

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:54:17
From: Divine Angel
ID: 1504845
Subject: re: Abolish Q

party_pants said:


Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U.

Not a Scrabble fan, are you? There’s lots of words with q that don’t require a u.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:55:04
From: furious
ID: 1504846
Subject: re: Abolish Q

fsm said:


party_pants said:

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

Here are a few examples…

antique
liquor
physique
picturesque
unique
mosquito
technique

And in those cases you could mostly get away with ditching the w and going with a straight k…

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:57:28
From: Arts
ID: 1504847
Subject: re: Abolish Q

furious said:


fsm said:

party_pants said:

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

Here are a few examples…

antique
liquor
physique
picturesque
unique
mosquito
technique

And in those cases you could mostly get away with ditching the w and going with a straight k…

antike
likor
physike
pictureske
unike
moskito
technike

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 13:58:28
From: Divine Angel
ID: 1504848
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Kwaint just doesn’t have the same ring to it.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:03:42
From: Michael V
ID: 1504849
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Arts said:


furious said:

fsm said:

Here are a few examples…

antique
liquor
physique
picturesque
unique
mosquito
technique

And in those cases you could mostly get away with ditching the w and going with a straight k…

antike
likor
physike
pictureske
unike
moskito
technike

anteek
licka
fizeek
picturesk
uneek
moskeeto
tekneek

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:04:36
From: sarahs mum
ID: 1504850
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Michael V said:


Arts said:

furious said:

And in those cases you could mostly get away with ditching the w and going with a straight k…

antike
likor
physike
pictureske
unike
moskito
technike

anteek
licka
fizeek
picturesk
uneek
moskeeto
tekneek

eweneek

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:11:21
From: Michael V
ID: 1504852
Subject: re: Abolish Q

sarahs mum said:


Michael V said:

Arts said:

antike
likor
physike
pictureske
unike
moskito
technike

anteek
licka
fizeek
picturesk
uneek
moskeeto
tekneek

eweneek

Ta. I was wondering how to do that one.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:12:09
From: fsm
ID: 1504854
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Michael V said:


Arts said:

furious said:

And in those cases you could mostly get away with ditching the w and going with a straight k…

antike
likor
physike
pictureske
unike
moskito
technike

anteek
licka
fizeek
picturesk
uneek
moskeeto
tekneek

anteak
lickor
fizzeek
pickchewresk
youneek
mosskeytoe
techneek

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:12:24
From: sibeen
ID: 1504855
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Nah, ya can get stuffed. I want to keep “Q”.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:14:53
From: furious
ID: 1504856
Subject: re: Abolish Q

sibeen said:


Nah, ya can get stuffed. I want to keep “Q”.

Get rid of the u that follows it around though, bludger…

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:15:15
From: sarahs mum
ID: 1504857
Subject: re: Abolish Q

sibeen said:


Nah, ya can get stuffed. I want to keep “Q”.

I am good with that. It is a letter I do like to write. It’s a bit arty.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:17:12
From: furious
ID: 1504859
Subject: re: Abolish Q

sarahs mum said:


sibeen said:

Nah, ya can get stuffed. I want to keep “Q”.

I am good with that. It is a letter I do like to write. It’s a bit arty.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:18:55
From: Arts
ID: 1504861
Subject: re: Abolish Q

furious said:


sarahs mum said:

sibeen said:

Nah, ya can get stuffed. I want to keep “Q”.

I am good with that. It is a letter I do like to write. It’s a bit arty.


oh I hadn’t thought of that..

LGBTI?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:19:34
From: Arts
ID: 1504862
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Arts said:


furious said:

sarahs mum said:

I am good with that. It is a letter I do like to write. It’s a bit arty.


oh I hadn’t thought of that..

LGBTI?

wait.. what happened to my post?

LGBT ( KW ) I

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:29:01
From: Divine Angel
ID: 1504863
Subject: re: Abolish Q

We’ll have to redesign the QWERTY keyboard.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:34:43
From: Woodie
ID: 1504864
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Ya can’t abolish Q!!! What would 007 have to say about that?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:45:52
From: Michael V
ID: 1504865
Subject: re: Abolish Q

furious said:


sarahs mum said:

sibeen said:

Nah, ya can get stuffed. I want to keep “Q”.

I am good with that. It is a letter I do like to write. It’s a bit arty.


What’s the significance of the sign?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:46:17
From: fsm
ID: 1504866
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Divine Angel said:


party_pants said:

Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U.

Not a Scrabble fan, are you? There’s lots of words with q that don’t require a u.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_containing_Q_not_followed_by_U

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:51:20
From: furious
ID: 1504867
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Michael V said:


furious said:

sarahs mum said:

I am good with that. It is a letter I do like to write. It’s a bit arty.


What’s the significance of the sign?

Far right conspiracy theory…

QAnon

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:52:50
From: dv
ID: 1504869
Subject: re: Abolish Q

furious said:


And X too, while you’re at it…

X, unlike Q, at least has the advantage that x is one character fewer than ks.

But you can get rid of C, or better still, make C = ch.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 14:58:51
From: party_pants
ID: 1504875
Subject: re: Abolish Q

furious said:


fsm said:

party_pants said:

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

Here are a few examples…

antique
liquor
physique
picturesque
unique
mosquito
technique

And in those cases you could mostly get away with ditching the w and going with a straight k…

Yes. Good point. well made.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:02:43
From: party_pants
ID: 1504877
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Divine Angel said:


We’ll have to redesign the QWERTY keyboard.

We could adopt a letter for “Th” and place it where the Q went.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:07:16
From: furious
ID: 1504879
Subject: re: Abolish Q

party_pants said:


Divine Angel said:

We’ll have to redesign the QWERTY keyboard.

We could adopt a letter for “Th” and place it where the Q went.

“We” used to have one. Called a thorn, I think…

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:11:09
From: party_pants
ID: 1504882
Subject: re: Abolish Q

furious said:


party_pants said:

Divine Angel said:

We’ll have to redesign the QWERTY keyboard.

We could adopt a letter for “Th” and place it where the Q went.

“We” used to have one. Called a thorn, I think…

Yes i know. Why that one got dropped and Q was kept is beyond me. Maybe the pronunciation was different in those days. I think it should be redesigned though, too close to a Y the way it was.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:20:06
From: Michael V
ID: 1504893
Subject: re: Abolish Q

furious said:


Michael V said:

furious said:


What’s the significance of the sign?

Far right conspiracy theory…

QAnon

Thanks.

Some USAsians are weird…

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:21:08
From: dv
ID: 1504894
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Why not go the whole hog and make English spelling fully phonetic…

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:22:15
From: buffy
ID: 1504895
Subject: re: Abolish Q

dv said:


Why not go the whole hog and make English spelling fully phonetic…

Because then you would just have Pitmanscript.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:22:34
From: Cymek
ID: 1504897
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Michael V said:


furious said:

Michael V said:

What’s the significance of the sign?

Far right conspiracy theory…

QAnon

Thanks.

Some USAsians are weird…

People seem to vastly overate the ability of the conspirators to carry out and maintain these secrets

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:30:36
From: Michael V
ID: 1504902
Subject: re: Abolish Q

party_pants said:


Divine Angel said:

We’ll have to redesign the QWERTY keyboard.

We could adopt a letter for “Th” and place it where the Q went.

There was a letter for “th” but it disappeared in modern English – the Thorn. In some writing styles, it looked somewhat like a “Y”. You can see the mistransliteration on signs in England eg “Ye Olde Inn”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorn_(letter)#Modern_English

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:33:03
From: dv
ID: 1504903
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Of course English has two “th” sounds so we really need two letters. Þ and ð like they do in Icelandic.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:33:37
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1504904
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Michael V said:


party_pants said:

Divine Angel said:

We’ll have to redesign the QWERTY keyboard.

We could adopt a letter for “Th” and place it where the Q went.

There was a letter for “th” but it disappeared in modern English – the Thorn. In some writing styles, it looked somewhat like a “Y”. You can see the mistransliteration on signs in England eg “Ye Olde Inn”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorn_(letter)#Modern_English

Surely it must have been known as the Yorn.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:37:08
From: party_pants
ID: 1504908
Subject: re: Abolish Q

The Rev Dodgson said:


Michael V said:

party_pants said:

We could adopt a letter for “Th” and place it where the Q went.

There was a letter for “th” but it disappeared in modern English – the Thorn. In some writing styles, it looked somewhat like a “Y”. You can see the mistransliteration on signs in England eg “Ye Olde Inn”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorn_(letter)#Modern_English

Surely it must have been known as the Yorn.

It was still pronounced with a th sound. What we would say as thorn.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:37:41
From: Michael V
ID: 1504909
Subject: re: Abolish Q

The Rev Dodgson said:


Michael V said:

party_pants said:

We could adopt a letter for “Th” and place it where the Q went.

There was a letter for “th” but it disappeared in modern English – the Thorn. In some writing styles, it looked somewhat like a “Y”. You can see the mistransliteration on signs in England eg “Ye Olde Inn”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorn_(letter)#Modern_English

Surely it must have been known as the Yorn.

giggle

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:38:28
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1504911
Subject: re: Abolish Q

The Rev Dodgson said:


Michael V said:

party_pants said:

We could adopt a letter for “Th” and place it where the Q went.

There was a letter for “th” but it disappeared in modern English – the Thorn. In some writing styles, it looked somewhat like a “Y”. You can see the mistransliteration on signs in England eg “Ye Olde Inn”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorn_(letter)#Modern_English

Surely it must have been known as the Yorn.

only in days of yor.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:40:36
From: dv
ID: 1504912
Subject: re: Abolish Q

ChrispenEvan said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Michael V said:

There was a letter for “th” but it disappeared in modern English – the Thorn. In some writing styles, it looked somewhat like a “Y”. You can see the mistransliteration on signs in England eg “Ye Olde Inn”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorn_(letter)#Modern_English

Surely it must have been known as the Yorn.

only in days of yor.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:41:35
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1504914
Subject: re: Abolish Q

dv said:


ChrispenEvan said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Surely it must have been known as the Yorn.

only in days of yor.


I was hoping for a Thor reference.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:43:09
From: Michael V
ID: 1504917
Subject: re: Abolish Q

ChrispenEvan said:


dv said:

ChrispenEvan said:

only in days of yor.


I was hoping for a Thor reference.

That’d be Yursday.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 15:44:52
From: dv
ID: 1504920
Subject: re: Abolish Q

ChrispenEvan said:


dv said:

ChrispenEvan said:

only in days of yor.


I was hoping for a Thor reference.

jɔː wɪʃ ɪz maɪ kəmɑːnd

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 16:14:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1504932
Subject: re: Abolish Q

yes, we were going to say, why confuse people by increasing ambiguity, and instead recommend use the ipa

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 16:20:40
From: transition
ID: 1504935
Subject: re: Abolish Q

party_pants said:


Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

q is more muted or softer than kw

it appears to be an exhalation, slightly rasped briefly at the back, and the restriction of airlfow seems to move from back toward front as lips go in, almost as if about to whistle, of using the word queen as an example

doing my head in

lady asks are you doing noise testing

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 16:42:44
From: dv
ID: 1504943
Subject: re: Abolish Q

transition said:


party_pants said:

Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

q is more muted or softer than kw

it appears to be an exhalation, slightly rasped briefly at the back, and the restriction of airlfow seems to move from back toward front as lips go in, almost as if about to whistle, of using the word queen as an example

doing my head in

lady asks are you doing noise testing

This is incorrect

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 16:52:14
From: transition
ID: 1504945
Subject: re: Abolish Q

dv said:


transition said:

party_pants said:

Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

q is more muted or softer than kw

it appears to be an exhalation, slightly rasped briefly at the back, and the restriction of airlfow seems to move from back toward front as lips go in, almost as if about to whistle, of using the word queen as an example

doing my head in

lady asks are you doing noise testing

This is incorrect

quite likely, it happens

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 16:52:18
From: Tamb
ID: 1504946
Subject: re: Abolish Q

dv said:


transition said:

party_pants said:

Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

q is more muted or softer than kw

it appears to be an exhalation, slightly rasped briefly at the back, and the restriction of airlfow seems to move from back toward front as lips go in, almost as if about to whistle, of using the word queen as an example

doing my head in

lady asks are you doing noise testing

This is incorrect


You could have said “Quite so” Or “Kwite so”

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 16:52:56
From: Cymek
ID: 1504948
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Read the Qanon Wikipedia article, people really believe such crap, one does wonder if its some foreign state (likely Russia) behind it

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 17:07:21
From: bucolic3401
ID: 1504951
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Americans don’t use “G”, but I think we should keep it if only for old times sake.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 17:11:41
From: Tamb
ID: 1504953
Subject: re: Abolish Q

bucolic3401 said:


Americans don’t use “G”, but I think we should keep it if only for old times sake.

Or W as in George dubbya.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 17:18:32
From: party_pants
ID: 1504955
Subject: re: Abolish Q

transition said:


party_pants said:

Why do we even have this letter in the alphabet? It is not even a stand-alone letter in normal usage, it is always followed by a U. Let’s just abolish it and use Kw isntead of Qu.

Is there any word with a Qu in it that could not simply be replaced by a Kw to indicate the same sound?

q is more muted or softer than kw

it appears to be an exhalation, slightly rasped briefly at the back, and the restriction of airlfow seems to move from back toward front as lips go in, almost as if about to whistle, of using the word queen as an example

doing my head in

lady asks are you doing noise testing

In my particular accent, there is no difference.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 21:14:39
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1505003
Subject: re: Abolish Q

furious said:


And X too, while you’re at it…

I have a book about spelling reform here by a correspondent of mine. I’ll see if I can find it. No, I must have archived it. The book is “Lindgren, Harry. Spelling Reform: A New Approach. Alpha Books, 1969.”

It does have a wikipedia entry. “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SR1” But this wikipedia entry is only for Stage 1 of a five stage spelling reform. Later stages abolish Q, X, C, Y etc. Another example I like is using “Hansm” for “Handsome”

Here’s a poem about the reform of the letter “e”

Draw a breth for progress,
Tred abrest ahed.
Fight agenst old spelling,
Better “red” than “read”.
Spred the words at brekfast,
Mesure them in bed,
Dream of welth and tresure,
Better “ded” than “dead”.

Stage 1:
Reform E (see above)
PH to F
Drop GH, eg. Laugh to Laf, Through to Thru

Phonetic A “http://runeberg.org/authors/lindghas.html” includes in summary

pa’m fe’ri li’n ho’l fu’ri muun
> palm fairy lean haul furry moon
dai lei koi hau lou
> die lay coy how low
dair leir koir our lour
> dire layer coir our lower
knaiv hrou’k fnetk horr of’sr of’s‘rz
> connive heroic phonetic horror officer officers
gramr sistr martr kulr hansm litl
> grammar sister martyr colour handsome little
en-geij lait-haus caild-hood
> engage lighthouse childhood

A sample of Phonetic A:

Hi hth disgreist mi, ‘nd hind’rd mi ha’f ‘milyn, la’ft ‘t mai losz, mokt ‘t mai geinz, skornd mai neishn, thwortd mai barg’nz, kuuld mai frendz, hi’td mai en’miz; ‘nd wots hiz ri’zn? Ai’m ‘Juu. Hath not ‘Juu aiz? hath not ‘Juu handz, org’nz, dmensh’nz, ‘feksh’nz, pash’nz? fed with dh’ seim fuud, hurt with dh’ seim wep’nz, subj’kt t’ dh’ seim disi’zz, hi’ld bai dh’ sem mi’nz, wormd ‘n kuuld bai dh’seim wintr ‘nd sumr, ‘z ‘Krsityn iz?

I’ve also seen a hilarious send-up of spelling reform. Here is is, from https://www.smart-jokes.org/english-spelling-reform.html Also more jokes about spelling reform on that web page.

A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling

For example, in Year 1 that useless letter “c” would be dropped to be replased either by “k” or “s,” and likewise “x” would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which “c” would be retained would be the “ch” formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform “w” spelling, so that “which” and “one” would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish “y” replasing it with “i” and Iear 4 might fiks the “g/j” anomali wonse and for all.

Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez “c,” “y” and “x”—bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez—tu riplais “ch,” “sh,” and “th” rispektivli.

Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe ingliy-spiking werld.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 21:35:38
From: btm
ID: 1505012
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Have a look at Riddley Walker by Russell Hoban. It presents a language evolved from English, and does a better job that any other book I’ve read.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 22:01:33
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1505020
Subject: re: Abolish Q

btm said:


Have a look at Riddley Walker by Russell Hoban. It presents a language evolved from English, and does a better job that any other book I’ve read.

Glasshouse by Stross has a future version of English, not spelling reform but at a time when a large number of current words have vanished from the language, words such as “work” and “cow” and “year” and “silk” and “government”.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 22:13:58
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1505021
Subject: re: Abolish Q

And what do we do with Q from Star Trek?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 22:18:16
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1505022
Subject: re: Abolish Q

Peak Warming Man said:


And what do we do with Q from Star Trek?

or james bond???

Reply Quote

Date: 24/02/2020 22:25:32
From: sarahs mum
ID: 1505023
Subject: re: Abolish Q

ChrispenEvan said:


Peak Warming Man said:

And what do we do with Q from Star Trek?

or james bond???

Never mind. We would only be minding our P’s.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/02/2020 08:33:28
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1505081
Subject: re: Abolish Q

ChrispenEvan said:


Peak Warming Man said:

And what do we do with Q from Star Trek?

or james bond???

Becomes Kewpie

Reply Quote