Date: 2/05/2020 15:38:28
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1549816
Subject: Deep-Sea Mining’s Environmental Toll

A deep-sea mining rush appears closer than ever to getting underway. Deep-sea mining, which requires extracting minerals and metals from the seafloor, has scientists and environmentalists worried because a growing body of research suggests its environmental damages are likely to be long-lasting and severe.

In international waters, a United Nations body called the International Seabed Authority (ISA) has granted 30 exploration contracts for an area of the underwater abyss three-times the size of California. These seabed parcels are split between 22 countries and companies hoping to extract mineral riches, including cobalt, copper, nickel and rare earth elements used in manufacturing cell phones, batteries and electric cars.

The 1989 experiment involved plowing an area of seafloor 13,615 feet below the surface to simulate the disturbance of mining. Since then, scientists have revisited the area to assess its response.

A 2019 study published in the journal Nature found many species had not returned to the plowed area even 26 years after the undersea dust had settled. The authors wrote that if their results were representative of deep-sea mining activities that the industry’s impacts might be “greater than expected, and could potentially lead to an irreversible loss of some ecosystem functions.”

The new study focused on even smaller organisms: the microbes buried in the sediments of the plowed tracks. A combination of photos and samples taken from the site in 2015 revealed that plowing new tracks slashed microbial community by half and that even the 26 year old tracks had still only recovered two-thirds of their microbes. This reduction in overall numbers of microbes also translated to a 75 percent slowdown of various microbial processes. Overall, the team calculated that it would take a full 50 years for the microbes in the simulated mining area to return to normal.

Drazen is one of a select few scientists who have explored the abyssal plain ecosystem of the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ), where the majority of the ISA’s undersea mining contracts are located. The CCZ covers 1.7 million square miles between Hawaii and Mexico and its seafloor is littered with polymetallic nodules, potato-like lumps of metal that contain cobalt, manganese, nickel and copper.

This new research gives a taste of the potential fallout of sending a mining machine in the deep sea, but the impacts are not limited to compacted seafloor and smothering sediment plume. The very things being mined also appear important for deep-sea life.

“Half of the species we have observed appear to rely on the nodules, even mobile animals seem to prefer them,” Drazen told me of the species in the CCZ. “The nodules are precisely what make this habitat unique.” And the nodules aren’t replaceable in any normal sense of the word: “When you lift them off the seafloor, you’re removing a habitat that took 10 million years to grow,” Drazen tells Wil Hylton of the Atlantic.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/deep-sea-minings-environmental-toll-could-last-decades-180974791/

Reply Quote

Date: 2/05/2020 21:35:03
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1549967
Subject: re: Deep-Sea Mining’s Environmental Toll

> A deep-sea mining rush appears closer than ever

Thank God for that. The deep sea is the one place in the whole world that is least disturbed by mining. Critters there are very few and far between. And unlike trees on land, most are mobile so can swim out of the way.

We are way overdue for deep ocean mining, I’ve been waiting for an announcement since the early 1970s, before Glomar Explorer turned out to be an American Military boondoggle.

But I don’t really believe it. Deep sea mining is as far away now as it ever was.

Reply Quote

Date: 2/05/2020 21:39:13
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1549970
Subject: re: Deep-Sea Mining’s Environmental Toll

mollwollfumble said:


> A deep-sea mining rush appears closer than ever

Thank God for that. The deep sea is the one place in the whole world that is least disturbed by mining. Critters there are very few and far between. And unlike trees on land, most are mobile so can swim out of the way.

We are way overdue for deep ocean mining, I’ve been waiting for an announcement since the early 1970s, before Glomar Explorer turned out to be an American Military boondoggle.

But I don’t really believe it. Deep sea mining is as far away now as it ever was.

deep sea mining is usually proposed to be viable around hydrothermal vents. where the vast majority of creatures live. They can’t swim to another one.

Reply Quote

Date: 2/05/2020 21:43:05
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1549978
Subject: re: Deep-Sea Mining’s Environmental Toll

ChrispenEvan said:


mollwollfumble said:

> A deep-sea mining rush appears closer than ever

Thank God for that. The deep sea is the one place in the whole world that is least disturbed by mining. Critters there are very few and far between. And unlike trees on land, most are mobile so can swim out of the way.

We are way overdue for deep ocean mining, I’ve been waiting for an announcement since the early 1970s, before Glomar Explorer turned out to be an American Military boondoggle.

But I don’t really believe it. Deep sea mining is as far away now as it ever was.

deep sea mining is usually proposed to be viable around hydrothermal vents. where the vast majority of creatures live. They can’t swim to another one.

Nah. Don’t mine near a hydrothermal vent.

But even there, the hydrothermal vents throughout the mid-Atlantic Ridge have only brine shrimps for company.

Reply Quote

Date: 2/05/2020 21:48:44
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1549982
Subject: re: Deep-Sea Mining’s Environmental Toll

mollwollfumble said:


ChrispenEvan said:

mollwollfumble said:

> A deep-sea mining rush appears closer than ever

Thank God for that. The deep sea is the one place in the whole world that is least disturbed by mining. Critters there are very few and far between. And unlike trees on land, most are mobile so can swim out of the way.

We are way overdue for deep ocean mining, I’ve been waiting for an announcement since the early 1970s, before Glomar Explorer turned out to be an American Military boondoggle.

But I don’t really believe it. Deep sea mining is as far away now as it ever was.

deep sea mining is usually proposed to be viable around hydrothermal vents. where the vast majority of creatures live. They can’t swim to another one.

Nah. Don’t mine near a hydrothermal vent.

But even there, the hydrothermal vents throughout the mid-Atlantic Ridge have only brine shrimps for company.

LOL, that is where the minerals are. and only brine shrimp, no.

Reply Quote

Date: 2/05/2020 23:52:53
From: dv
ID: 1550030
Subject: re: Deep-Sea Mining’s Environmental Toll

interesting topic and tbh one I’d not considered

Reply Quote