The Silurian Period occurred from 443 million to 416 million years ago. It was the third period in the Paleozoic Era. It followed the Ordovician Period and preceded the Devonian Period. During this time, continental landmasses were low and sea levels were rising. This meant rich shallow sea ecosystems with new ecological niches. Silurian fossils show evidence of extensive reef building and the first signs that life beginning to colonize the new estuary, fresh water and terrestrial ecosystems.

During the Silurian Period, the climate was generally warm and stable, in contrast to the glaciers of the late Ordovician and the extreme heat of the Devonian. A warm, stable climate provided for one of the most significant developments to take place during the Silurian Period: the arrival of the first plants to colonize the land. Lichens were probably the first photosynthetic organisms to cling to the rocky coasts of the early continents. When organic matter from decaying lichens joined the action of erosion to wear away rock, the first real soil began to build up in shallow, protected estuaries. Bryophytes such moss, hornworts and liverworts first appeared in the late Ordovician. The first known plant to have an upright stalk, and vascular tissue for water transport, was the Cooksonia of the mid-Silurian deltas. This little plant was a few centimeters high with a branched structure with small bulbous tips. It lacked true leaves, suggesting that the stalk developed to disperse spores and was not itself photosynthetic. The first known air-breathing animals were arthropods. Millipedes, centipedes and the earliest arachnids first appear in the Silurian. Since arachnids are exclusively predatory, this represents the first terrestrial food web.

https://www.livescience.com/43514-silurian-period.html

PermeateFree said:

The Silurian Period occurred from 443 million to 416 million years ago. It was the third period in the Paleozoic Era. It followed the Ordovician Period and preceded the Devonian Period. During this time, continental landmasses were low and sea levels were rising. This meant rich shallow sea ecosystems with new ecological niches. Silurian fossils show evidence of extensive reef building and the first signs that life beginning to colonize the new estuary, fresh water and terrestrial ecosystems.

During the Silurian Period, the climate was generally warm and stable, in contrast to the glaciers of the late Ordovician and the extreme heat of the Devonian. A warm, stable climate provided for one of the most significant developments to take place during the Silurian Period: the arrival of the first plants to colonize the land. Lichens were probably the first photosynthetic organisms to cling to the rocky coasts of the early continents. When organic matter from decaying lichens joined the action of erosion to wear away rock, the first real soil began to build up in shallow, protected estuaries. Bryophytes such moss, hornworts and liverworts first appeared in the late Ordovician. The first known plant to have an upright stalk, and vascular tissue for water transport, was the Cooksonia of the mid-Silurian deltas. This little plant was a few centimeters high with a branched structure with small bulbous tips. It lacked true leaves, suggesting that the stalk developed to disperse spores and was not itself photosynthetic. The first known air-breathing animals were arthropods. Millipedes, centipedes and the earliest arachnids first appear in the Silurian. Since arachnids are exclusively predatory, this represents the first terrestrial food web.

https://www.livescience.com/43514-silurian-period.html

Some of these fossils are found in opalised deposits?

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

The Silurian Period occurred from 443 million to 416 million years ago. It was the third period in the Paleozoic Era. It followed the Ordovician Period and preceded the Devonian Period. During this time, continental landmasses were low and sea levels were rising. This meant rich shallow sea ecosystems with new ecological niches. Silurian fossils show evidence of extensive reef building and the first signs that life beginning to colonize the new estuary, fresh water and terrestrial ecosystems.

During the Silurian Period, the climate was generally warm and stable, in contrast to the glaciers of the late Ordovician and the extreme heat of the Devonian. A warm, stable climate provided for one of the most significant developments to take place during the Silurian Period: the arrival of the first plants to colonize the land. Lichens were probably the first photosynthetic organisms to cling to the rocky coasts of the early continents. When organic matter from decaying lichens joined the action of erosion to wear away rock, the first real soil began to build up in shallow, protected estuaries. Bryophytes such moss, hornworts and liverworts first appeared in the late Ordovician. The first known plant to have an upright stalk, and vascular tissue for water transport, was the Cooksonia of the mid-Silurian deltas. This little plant was a few centimeters high with a branched structure with small bulbous tips. It lacked true leaves, suggesting that the stalk developed to disperse spores and was not itself photosynthetic. The first known air-breathing animals were arthropods. Millipedes, centipedes and the earliest arachnids first appear in the Silurian. Since arachnids are exclusively predatory, this represents the first terrestrial food web.

https://www.livescience.com/43514-silurian-period.html

Some of these fossils are found in opalised deposits?

Think the opalised deposits are from a much later period, marine creatures there lived in Australia’s inland sea from the Cretaceous period (144 to 65 million years ago).

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

The Silurian Period occurred from 443 million to 416 million years ago. It was the third period in the Paleozoic Era. It followed the Ordovician Period and preceded the Devonian Period. During this time, continental landmasses were low and sea levels were rising. This meant rich shallow sea ecosystems with new ecological niches. Silurian fossils show evidence of extensive reef building and the first signs that life beginning to colonize the new estuary, fresh water and terrestrial ecosystems.

During the Silurian Period, the climate was generally warm and stable, in contrast to the glaciers of the late Ordovician and the extreme heat of the Devonian. A warm, stable climate provided for one of the most significant developments to take place during the Silurian Period: the arrival of the first plants to colonize the land. Lichens were probably the first photosynthetic organisms to cling to the rocky coasts of the early continents. When organic matter from decaying lichens joined the action of erosion to wear away rock, the first real soil began to build up in shallow, protected estuaries. Bryophytes such moss, hornworts and liverworts first appeared in the late Ordovician. The first known plant to have an upright stalk, and vascular tissue for water transport, was the Cooksonia of the mid-Silurian deltas. This little plant was a few centimeters high with a branched structure with small bulbous tips. It lacked true leaves, suggesting that the stalk developed to disperse spores and was not itself photosynthetic. The first known air-breathing animals were arthropods. Millipedes, centipedes and the earliest arachnids first appear in the Silurian. Since arachnids are exclusively predatory, this represents the first terrestrial food web.

https://www.livescience.com/43514-silurian-period.html

Some of these fossils are found in opalised deposits?

Think the opalised deposits are from a much later period, marine creatures there lived in Australia’s inland sea from the Cretaceous period (144 to 65 million years ago).

Well they are encased in cretaceous outcrops.

PermeateFree said:

The Silurian Period occurred from 443 million to 416 million years ago. It was the third period in the Paleozoic Era. It followed the Ordovician Period and preceded the Devonian Period. During this time, continental landmasses were low and sea levels were rising. This meant rich shallow sea ecosystems with new ecological niches. Silurian fossils show evidence of extensive reef building and the first signs that life beginning to colonize the new estuary, fresh water and terrestrial ecosystems.

During the Silurian Period, the climate was generally warm and stable, in contrast to the glaciers of the late Ordovician and the extreme heat of the Devonian. A warm, stable climate provided for one of the most significant developments to take place during the Silurian Period: the arrival of the first plants to colonize the land. Lichens were probably the first photosynthetic organisms to cling to the rocky coasts of the early continents. When organic matter from decaying lichens joined the action of erosion to wear away rock, the first real soil began to build up in shallow, protected estuaries. Bryophytes such moss, hornworts and liverworts first appeared in the late Ordovician. The first known plant to have an upright stalk, and vascular tissue for water transport, was the Cooksonia of the mid-Silurian deltas. This little plant was a few centimeters high with a branched structure with small bulbous tips. It lacked true leaves, suggesting that the stalk developed to disperse spores and was not itself photosynthetic. The first known air-breathing animals were arthropods. Millipedes, centipedes and the earliest arachnids first appear in the Silurian. Since arachnids are exclusively predatory, this represents the first terrestrial food web.

https://www.livescience.com/43514-silurian-period.html

Nice article

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

The Silurian Period occurred from 443 million to 416 million years ago. It was the third period in the Paleozoic Era. It followed the Ordovician Period and preceded the Devonian Period. During this time, continental landmasses were low and sea levels were rising. This meant rich shallow sea ecosystems with new ecological niches. Silurian fossils show evidence of extensive reef building and the first signs that life beginning to colonize the new estuary, fresh water and terrestrial ecosystems.

During the Silurian Period, the climate was generally warm and stable, in contrast to the glaciers of the late Ordovician and the extreme heat of the Devonian. A warm, stable climate provided for one of the most significant developments to take place during the Silurian Period: the arrival of the first plants to colonize the land. Lichens were probably the first photosynthetic organisms to cling to the rocky coasts of the early continents. When organic matter from decaying lichens joined the action of erosion to wear away rock, the first real soil began to build up in shallow, protected estuaries. Bryophytes such moss, hornworts and liverworts first appeared in the late Ordovician. The first known plant to have an upright stalk, and vascular tissue for water transport, was the Cooksonia of the mid-Silurian deltas. This little plant was a few centimeters high with a branched structure with small bulbous tips. It lacked true leaves, suggesting that the stalk developed to disperse spores and was not itself photosynthetic. The first known air-breathing animals were arthropods. Millipedes, centipedes and the earliest arachnids first appear in the Silurian. Since arachnids are exclusively predatory, this represents the first terrestrial food web.

https://www.livescience.com/43514-silurian-period.html

Nice article

Pleased you don’t have more petty issues with an oddly used word.

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

The Silurian Period occurred from 443 million to 416 million years ago. It was the third period in the Paleozoic Era. It followed the Ordovician Period and preceded the Devonian Period. During this time, continental landmasses were low and sea levels were rising. This meant rich shallow sea ecosystems with new ecological niches. Silurian fossils show evidence of extensive reef building and the first signs that life beginning to colonize the new estuary, fresh water and terrestrial ecosystems.

During the Silurian Period, the climate was generally warm and stable, in contrast to the glaciers of the late Ordovician and the extreme heat of the Devonian. A warm, stable climate provided for one of the most significant developments to take place during the Silurian Period: the arrival of the first plants to colonize the land. Lichens were probably the first photosynthetic organisms to cling to the rocky coasts of the early continents. When organic matter from decaying lichens joined the action of erosion to wear away rock, the first real soil began to build up in shallow, protected estuaries. Bryophytes such moss, hornworts and liverworts first appeared in the late Ordovician. The first known plant to have an upright stalk, and vascular tissue for water transport, was the Cooksonia of the mid-Silurian deltas. This little plant was a few centimeters high with a branched structure with small bulbous tips. It lacked true leaves, suggesting that the stalk developed to disperse spores and was not itself photosynthetic. The first known air-breathing animals were arthropods. Millipedes, centipedes and the earliest arachnids first appear in the Silurian. Since arachnids are exclusively predatory, this represents the first terrestrial food web.

https://www.livescience.com/43514-silurian-period.html

Nice article

Pleased you don’t have more petty issues with an oddly used word.

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Nice article

Pleased you don’t have more petty issues with an oddly used word.

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

Fair enough, but where would you place millipedes that the average person would understand. Not an insect, nor an arachnid, so a millipede is a…………?

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Pleased you don’t have more petty issues with an oddly used word.

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

Fair enough, but where would you place millipedes that the average person would understand. Not an insect, nor an arachnid, so a millipede is a…………?

Myriapod – many foot. “The fossil record of myriapods reaches back into the late Silurian, although molecular evidence suggests a diversification in the Cambrian Period, and Cambrian fossils exist which resemble myriapods”.

The Silurian is a period about which I know very little. I’m more familiar with the Devonian and the fossils from Gogo. Am I right in thinking that most fossil types from the Silurian were also present either earlier or later than the Silurian?

mollwollfumble said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

Fair enough, but where would you place millipedes that the average person would understand. Not an insect, nor an arachnid, so a millipede is a…………?

Myriapod – many foot. “The fossil record of myriapods reaches back into the late Silurian, although molecular evidence suggests a diversification in the Cambrian Period, and Cambrian fossils exist which resemble myriapods”.

The Silurian is a period about which I know very little. I’m more familiar with the Devonian and the fossils from Gogo. Am I right in thinking that most fossil types from the Silurian were also present either earlier or later than the Silurian?

Centipedes and Millipedes had a common ancestor, but by around 420 million years ago they had each evolved into different organisms. As the fossil record around this period, evidence is difficult to come by and is still a work very much in progress. There is speculation in one of the articles that their ancestor might go back as far as 500 million years.

I know the Silurian period from fossils I dug near Yea in Victoria, where many were collected but few identified at the time. The Cooksonia plant genus, containing the oldest known land plants could be found there too although I did not come across it.

ORDOVICIAN-SILURIAN EXTINCTION 440 MILLION YEARS AGO
Scientists theorize that there were two main phases to this extinction: a glaciation event and a heating event. Abundant plant life removed carbon dioxide (CO
2) from the air, causing global cooling and glacier formation. This led to a drop in sea levels, reducing habitat. Later came global warming and sea level rising again. Creatures that had adapted to the cooler climate were unable to survive the increased temperature.

The Ordovician–Silurian extinction events, when combined, are the second-largest of the five major extinction events in Earth’s history in terms of percentage of genera that became extinct. Wikipedia
Occurred: 450 million years ago – 440 million years ago
Percent of species extinct: 60% – 70%

Silurian— Devonian period 444 to 419 million years ago
A distinct change in geochemical composition of the sediments of the linograptid “interregnum” as evidence fora short-term shallowing of the upwelling system, which brought nutrient-rich water. This change in graptolite fauna above the LAD of Monograptus transgradiens was,according to Porebska & Sawlowicz (1997), caused by a high productivity of cyanobacteria, which consequently in-creased the level of the anoxic layer. An upwelling of anoxic water was fatal for uniserial, straight monograptid colonies living deeper (close to the base of the mixed layer or near the top of the denitrification zone) than Linograptus populations. A high content of rhenium in sediments of the linograptid “interregnum” is also supporting a decrease in oxygen content of seawater. Porebska & Sawlowicz’s model (1997) also explains the demersal cephalopod species diversity decline as well as its low impact on the diversity of pelagic cephalopods.

So very selective extinctions dependent of where the organisms lived within the water column.

mollwollfumble said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

Fair enough, but where would you place millipedes that the average person would understand. Not an insect, nor an arachnid, so a millipede is a…………?

Myriapod – many foot. “The fossil record of myriapods reaches back into the late Silurian, although molecular evidence suggests a diversification in the Cambrian Period, and Cambrian fossils exist which resemble myriapods”.

The Silurian is a period about which I know very little. I’m more familiar with the Devonian and the fossils from Gogo. Am I right in thinking that most fossil types from the Silurian were also present either earlier or later than the Silurian?

Centipedes and Millipedes had a common ancestor, but by around 420 million years ago they had each evolved into different organisms. As the fossil record around this period, evidence is difficult to come by and is still a work very much in progress. There is speculation in one of the articles that their ancestor might go back as far as 500 million years.

PermeateFree said:

mollwollfumble said:

PermeateFree said:

Fair enough, but where would you place millipedes that the average person would understand. Not an insect, nor an arachnid, so a millipede is a…………?

Myriapod – many foot. “The fossil record of myriapods reaches back into the late Silurian, although molecular evidence suggests a diversification in the Cambrian Period, and Cambrian fossils exist which resemble myriapods”.

The Silurian is a period about which I know very little. I’m more familiar with the Devonian and the fossils from Gogo. Am I right in thinking that most fossil types from the Silurian were also present either earlier or later than the Silurian?

Centipedes and Millipedes had a common ancestor, but by around 420 million years ago they had each evolved into different organisms. As the fossil record around this period, evidence is difficult to come by and is still a work very much in progress. There is speculation in one of the articles that their ancestor might go back as far as 500 million years.

Wrong thread, must be getting tired.

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Pleased you don’t have more petty issues with an oddly used word.

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

Fair enough, but where would you place millipedes that the average person would understand. Not an insect, nor an arachnid, so a millipede is a…………?

an arthopod?

PermeateFree said:

mollwollfumble said:

PermeateFree said:

Fair enough, but where would you place millipedes that the average person would understand. Not an insect, nor an arachnid, so a millipede is a…………?

Myriapod – many foot. “The fossil record of myriapods reaches back into the late Silurian, although molecular evidence suggests a diversification in the Cambrian Period, and Cambrian fossils exist which resemble myriapods”.

The Silurian is a period about which I know very little. I’m more familiar with the Devonian and the fossils from Gogo. Am I right in thinking that most fossil types from the Silurian were also present either earlier or later than the Silurian?

Centipedes and Millipedes had a common ancestor, but by around 420 million years ago they had each evolved into different organisms. As the fossil record around this period, evidence is difficult to come by and is still a work very much in progress. There is speculation in one of the articles that their ancestor might go back as far as 500 million years.

I know the Silurian period from fossils I dug near Yea in Victoria, where many were collected but few identified at the time. The Cooksonia plant genus, containing the oldest known land plants could be found there too although I did not come across it.

ORDOVICIAN-SILURIAN EXTINCTION 440 MILLION YEARS AGO
Scientists theorize that there were two main phases to this extinction: a glaciation event and a heating event. Abundant plant life removed carbon dioxide (CO
2) from the air, causing global cooling and glacier formation. This led to a drop in sea levels, reducing habitat. Later came global warming and sea level rising again. Creatures that had adapted to the cooler climate were unable to survive the increased temperature.

The Ordovician–Silurian extinction events, when combined, are the second-largest of the five major extinction events in Earth’s history in terms of percentage of genera that became extinct. Wikipedia
Occurred: 450 million years ago – 440 million years ago
Percent of species extinct: 60% – 70%

Silurian— Devonian period 444 to 419 million years ago
A distinct change in geochemical composition of the sediments of the linograptid “interregnum” as evidence fora short-term shallowing of the upwelling system, which brought nutrient-rich water. This change in graptolite fauna above the LAD of Monograptus transgradiens was,according to Porebska & Sawlowicz (1997), caused by a high productivity of cyanobacteria, which consequently in-creased the level of the anoxic layer. An upwelling of anoxic water was fatal for uniserial, straight monograptid colonies living deeper (close to the base of the mixed layer or near the top of the denitrification zone) than Linograptus populations. A high content of rhenium in sediments of the linograptid “interregnum” is also supporting a decrease in oxygen content of seawater. Porebska & Sawlowicz’s model (1997) also explains the demersal cephalopod species diversity decline as well as its low impact on the diversity of pelagic cephalopods.

So very selective extinctions dependent of where the organisms lived within the water column.

> I know the Silurian period from fossils I dug near Yea in Victoria, where many were collected but few identified at the time. The Cooksonia plant genus, containing the oldest known land plants could be found there too although I did not come across it.

Oh, excellent.

> The Ordovician–Silurian extinction events, when combined, are the second-largest of the five major extinction events in Earth’s history

Yike. I’ll remember that.

> A high content of rhenium in sediments

Weird.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

Fair enough, but where would you place millipedes that the average person would understand. Not an insect, nor an arachnid, so a millipede is a…………?

an arthopod?

r

roughbarked said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Fair enough, but where would you place millipedes that the average person would understand. Not an insect, nor an arachnid, so a millipede is a…………?

an arthopod?

r

Arthropods also include insects and spiders, so that definition is not applicable.

Right so what is the pseudophyletic term for miners, bats, rays and cnidarians ¿

SCIENCE said:

Right so what is the pseudophyletic term for miners, bats, rays and cnidarians ¿

You know such bastardry will never pass my lips

SCIENCE said:

Right so what is the pseudophyletic term for miners, bats, rays and cnidarians ¿

You sound peeved, but you have dv to console you.

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

roughbarked said:

an arthopod?

r

Arthropods also include insects and spiders, so that definition is not applicable.

An arthropod known as myriapoda is as everyone else knows, a millipede.

• Right so what is the pseudophyletic term for miners, bats, rays and cnidarians ¿

Just curious, is there an actual answer to that question?

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

r

Arthropods also include insects and spiders, so that definition is not applicable.

An arthropod known as myriapoda is as everyone else knows, a millipede.

You miss the point, yes myriapoda is an Arthropod, but so is the spider and an insect, so it does not exclusively refer to a millipedes as a group.

furious said:

• Right so what is the pseudophyletic term for miners, bats, rays and cnidarians ¿

Just curious, is there an actual answer to that question?

dv knows all about these things. :))

furious said:

• Right so what is the pseudophyletic term for miners, bats, rays and cnidarians ¿

Just curious, is there an actual answer to that question?

Miners H Sapiens. Bats Chiroptera. Rays X. Cnidarians Jellyfish

Tamb said:

furious said:

• Right so what is the pseudophyletic term for miners, bats, rays and cnidarians ¿

Just curious, is there an actual answer to that question?

Miners H Sapiens. Bats Chiroptera. Rays X. Cnidarians Jellyfish

I thought the question was about one pseudophyletic term that covers them all. And I thought miner was a type of bird…

furious said:

Tamb said:

furious said:

• Right so what is the pseudophyletic term for miners, bats, rays and cnidarians ¿

Just curious, is there an actual answer to that question?

Miners H Sapiens. Bats Chiroptera. Rays X. Cnidarians Jellyfish

I thought the question was about one pseudophyletic term that covers them all. And I thought miner was a type of bird…

You are right & I was being silly But miners are also humans, insects & machines.

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Arthropods also include insects and spiders, so that definition is not applicable.

An arthropod known as myriapoda is as everyone else knows, a millipede.

You miss the point, yes myriapoda is an Arthropod, but so is the spider and an insect, so it does not exclusively refer to a millipedes as a group.

Diplopoda
If you were talking about the general populace using bugs to distinguish them from spiders and insects… then it is all a bit silly.

Hey man, PermeateFree, pal, chum, compadre, tovarish…

I think you’ve taken criticism of a minor fault in just one of the articles you posted too personally. We’re not blaming you. This was intrinsically interesting news, thank you for bringing it to our attention.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

An arthropod known as myriapoda is as everyone else knows, a millipede.

You miss the point, yes myriapoda is an Arthropod, but so is the spider and an insect, so it does not exclusively refer to a millipedes as a group.

Diplopoda
If you were talking about the general populace using bugs to distinguish them from spiders and insects… then it is all a bit silly.

Yes I’m feeling that way myself.

dv said:

Hey man, PermeateFree, pal, chum, compadre, tovarish…

I think you’ve taken criticism of a minor fault in just one of the articles you posted too personally. We’re not blaming you. This was intrinsically interesting news, thank you for bringing it to our attention.

You patronising dick, go get a life.

furious said:

Tamb said:

furious said:

• Right so what is the pseudophyletic term for miners, bats, rays and cnidarians ¿

Just curious, is there an actual answer to that question?

Miners H Sapiens. Bats Chiroptera. Rays X. Cnidarians Jellyfish

I thought the question was about one pseudophyletic term that covers them all. And I thought miner was a type of bird…

well they’re all animals that achieve locomotion through some kind of fluid

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Hey man, PermeateFree, pal, chum, compadre, tovarish…

I think you’ve taken criticism of a minor fault in just one of the articles you posted too personally. We’re not blaming you. This was intrinsically interesting news, thank you for bringing it to our attention.

You patronising dick, go get a life.

calumny

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Hey man, PermeateFree, pal, chum, compadre, tovarish…

I think you’ve taken criticism of a minor fault in just one of the articles you posted too personally. We’re not blaming you. This was intrinsically interesting news, thank you for bringing it to our attention.

You patronising dick, go get a life.

Trying to offer the olive branch , sending out the dove of peace, covered in the mildew of friendship, trying to cover all the domains here.

SCIENCE said:

furious said:

Tamb said:

Miners H Sapiens. Bats Chiroptera. Rays X. Cnidarians Jellyfish

I thought the question was about one pseudophyletic term that covers them all. And I thought miner was a type of bird…

well they’re all animals that achieve locomotion through some kind of fluid

So do I sometimes.

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

furious said:

I thought the question was about one pseudophyletic term that covers them all. And I thought miner was a type of bird…

well they’re all animals that achieve locomotion through some kind of fluid

So do I sometimes.

Castor oil will do that.

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

furious said:

I thought the question was about one pseudophyletic term that covers them all. And I thought miner was a type of bird…

well they’re all animals that achieve locomotion through some kind of fluid

So do I sometimes.

in fairness there are non-Myriapoda with myriad pods too…

Tamb said:

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

well they’re all animals that achieve locomotion through some kind of fluid

So do I sometimes.

Castor oil will do that.

that would be some liquid locomotoring through me

But in all seriousness I think most people know the word millipede…

dv said:

But in all seriousness I think most people know the word millipede…

Even if they don’t have 1000 legs.

SCIENCE said:

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

well they’re all animals that achieve locomotion through some kind of fluid

So do I sometimes.

in fairness there are non-Myriapoda with myriad pods too…

:)

dv said:

But in all seriousness I think most people know the word millipede…

I did have that thought myself.

Tamb said:

dv said:

But in all seriousness I think most people know the word millipede…

Even if they don’t have 1000 legs.

Don’t think they ever did. Someone just gave up counting and rounded it out to more than a lot.

roughbarked said:

Tamb said:

dv said:

But in all seriousness I think most people know the word millipede…

Even if they don’t have 1000 legs.

Don’t think they ever did. Someone just gave up counting and rounded it out to more than a lot.

True dat.

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Hey man, PermeateFree, pal, chum, compadre, tovarish…

I think you’ve taken criticism of a minor fault in just one of the articles you posted too personally. We’re not blaming you. This was intrinsically interesting news, thank you for bringing it to our attention.

You patronising dick, go get a life.

Trying to offer the olive branch , sending out the dove of peace, covered in the mildew of friendship, trying to cover all the domains here.

Never trust a Greek bearing gifts.

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

You patronising dick, go get a life.

Trying to offer the olive branch , sending out the dove of peace, covered in the mildew of friendship, trying to cover all the domains here.

Never trust a Greek bearing gifts.

Who said he was Greek?

Though he can be a bit slippery.

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Arthropods also include insects and spiders, so that definition is not applicable.

An arthropod known as myriapoda is as everyone else knows, a millipede.

You miss the point, yes myriapoda is an Arthropod, but so is the spider and an insect, so it does not exclusively refer to a millipedes as a group.

What’s wrong with “millipedes”. Most people call millipedes “millipedes”.

Tamb said:

roughbarked said:

Tamb said:

Even if they don’t have 1000 legs.

Don’t think they ever did. Someone just gave up counting and rounded it out to more than a lot.

True dat.

Then again he could have been counting the legs of a Polyxenida.

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

An arthropod known as myriapoda is as everyone else knows, a millipede.

You miss the point, yes myriapoda is an Arthropod, but so is the spider and an insect, so it does not exclusively refer to a millipedes as a group.

What’s wrong with “millipedes”. Most people call millipedes “millipedes”.

Other than those who mistakenly think they are centipedes.

Well it’s a good job that nobody will ever want to read the topics posted here, so there is little damage done in trashing them. :))

SCIENCE said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Hey man, PermeateFree, pal, chum, compadre, tovarish…

I think you’ve taken criticism of a minor fault in just one of the articles you posted too personally. We’re not blaming you. This was intrinsically interesting news, thank you for bringing it to our attention.

You patronising dick, go get a life.

calumny

:)

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

An arthropod known as myriapoda is as everyone else knows, a millipede.

You miss the point, yes myriapoda is an Arthropod, but so is the spider and an insect, so it does not exclusively refer to a millipedes as a group.

What’s wrong with “millipedes”. Most people call millipedes “millipedes”.

Go read the OP if you are sufficiently interested, because I am not. I will only say that I have written about this group and it is difficult to do so. Something you need to try for yourselves because I have had it with all the silly remarks from the armchair experts around here.

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

You miss the point, yes myriapoda is an Arthropod, but so is the spider and an insect, so it does not exclusively refer to a millipedes as a group.

What’s wrong with “millipedes”. Most people call millipedes “millipedes”.

Go read the OP if you are sufficiently interested, because I am not. I will only say that I have written about this group and it is difficult to do so. Something you need to try for yourselves because I have had it with all the silly remarks from the armchair experts around here.

So which chair do you use?

Michael V said:

SCIENCE said:

PermeateFree said:

You patronising dick, go get a life.

calumny

:)

Yes he has been very busy with the Thesaurus. Bet his copy is very well thumbed.

dv said:

This was intrinsically interesting news, thank you for bringing it to our attention.

+1

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

What’s wrong with “millipedes”. Most people call millipedes “millipedes”.

Go read the OP if you are sufficiently interested, because I am not. I will only say that I have written about this group and it is difficult to do so. Something you need to try for yourselves because I have had it with all the silly remarks from the armchair experts around here.

So which chair do you use?

Go away roughy, I have not the patience for you right now.

Look, circling back a bit…

Normally headlines like to present the most striking piece of information.

Like when YG went into orbit, the papers didn’t describe him as “The First Short Man From The Soviet Union In Space”. Narrowing the scope makes the record less interesting.

So saying that this particular thing is “The Oldest Millipede Fossil” or “The Oldest Arthropod Fossil” is less interesting and impressive than going as wide as possible, by saying it is “The Oldest Land Animal Fossil”.

This thread seems to be trending, can I help with anything?

Peak Warming Man said:

This thread seems to be trending, can I help with anything?

I give you Plato’s Man.

dv said:

Look, circling back a bit…

Normally headlines like to present the most striking piece of information.

Like when YG went into orbit, the papers didn’t describe him as “The First Short Man From The Soviet Union In Space”. Narrowing the scope makes the record less interesting.

So saying that this particular thing is “The Oldest Millipede Fossil” or “The Oldest Arthropod Fossil” is less interesting and impressive than going as wide as possible, by saying it is “The Oldest Land Animal Fossil”.

Haven’t you got a family to look after?

Peak Warming Man said:

This thread seems to be trending, can I help with anything?

please, make another bowl of popcorn.

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

You miss the point, yes myriapoda is an Arthropod, but so is the spider and an insect, so it does not exclusively refer to a millipedes as a group.

What’s wrong with “millipedes”. Most people call millipedes “millipedes”.

Go read the OP if you are sufficiently interested, because I am not. I will only say that I have written about this group and it is difficult to do so. Something you need to try for yourselves because I have had it with all the silly remarks from the armchair experts around here.

Thanks.

I did read the opening post, and I posted a picture of the millipede along with more, and more succinct informtion (published elsewhere) and I read other stuff on it as well, including the original scientists comments about the zircon extraction developed by an undergraduate student.

I didn’t involve myself in the discussion, until I thought that more than enough was more than enough.

I’m sorry you see my contributions as a silly remarks from an armchair expert.

:(

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

SCIENCE said:

calumny

:)

Yes he has been very busy with the Thesaurus. Bet his copy is very well thumbed.

I’d not been introduced to the word before.

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

What’s wrong with “millipedes”. Most people call millipedes “millipedes”.

Go read the OP if you are sufficiently interested, because I am not. I will only say that I have written about this group and it is difficult to do so. Something you need to try for yourselves because I have had it with all the silly remarks from the armchair experts around here.

Thanks.

I did read the opening post, and I posted a picture of the millipede along with more, and more succinct informtion (published elsewhere) and I read other stuff on it as well, including the original scientists comments about the zircon extraction developed by an undergraduate student.

I didn’t involve myself in the discussion, until I thought that more than enough was more than enough.

I’m sorry you see my contributions as a silly remarks from an armchair expert.

:(

Stop playing the martyr.

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

Go read the OP if you are sufficiently interested, because I am not. I will only say that I have written about this group and it is difficult to do so. Something you need to try for yourselves because I have had it with all the silly remarks from the armchair experts around here.

Thanks.

I did read the opening post, and I posted a picture of the millipede along with more, and more succinct informtion (published elsewhere) and I read other stuff on it as well, including the original scientists comments about the zircon extraction developed by an undergraduate student.

I didn’t involve myself in the discussion, until I thought that more than enough was more than enough.

I’m sorry you see my contributions as a silly remarks from an armchair expert.

:(

Stop playing the martyr.

Stop playing the angry man that everybody gangs up on.

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Look, circling back a bit…

Normally headlines like to present the most striking piece of information.

Like when YG went into orbit, the papers didn’t describe him as “The First Short Man From The Soviet Union In Space”. Narrowing the scope makes the record less interesting.

So saying that this particular thing is “The Oldest Millipede Fossil” or “The Oldest Arthropod Fossil” is less interesting and impressive than going as wide as possible, by saying it is “The Oldest Land Animal Fossil”.

Haven’t you got a family to look after?

Yes but they are otherwise occupied at present. Nonetheless, I thank you for your concern, no matter how stalkerish.

Take a look at this marvelous piece by Nicolas-Quinibert Foliot.

Now that man was an armchair expert.

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

Thanks.

I did read the opening post, and I posted a picture of the millipede along with more, and more succinct informtion (published elsewhere) and I read other stuff on it as well, including the original scientists comments about the zircon extraction developed by an undergraduate student.

I didn’t involve myself in the discussion, until I thought that more than enough was more than enough.

I’m sorry you see my contributions as a silly remarks from an armchair expert.

:(

Stop playing the martyr.

Stop playing the angry man that everybody gangs up on.

Well this is the second thread that has been trashed on the same petty little subject. Just goes to show the scientific interest here. Give them something simple to chew on, preferably presented in less than 3 lines of text and everyone wants to comment. Give them science topic and hardly anyone comments, except if there is a minor disagreement over presentation and everyone want their say, especially after being egged on by certain vindictive people who think it funny that they can stir up so much trouble.

Well fine, I know the score is, but I’ll still post scientific topics, not now to educate the ignorant, but for my own benefit and to annoy those who would wish me gone.

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Look, circling back a bit…

Normally headlines like to present the most striking piece of information.

Like when YG went into orbit, the papers didn’t describe him as “The First Short Man From The Soviet Union In Space”. Narrowing the scope makes the record less interesting.

So saying that this particular thing is “The Oldest Millipede Fossil” or “The Oldest Arthropod Fossil” is less interesting and impressive than going as wide as possible, by saying it is “The Oldest Land Animal Fossil”.

Haven’t you got a family to look after?

Yes but they are otherwise occupied at present. Nonetheless, I thank you for your concern, no matter how stalkerish.

They mostly seem to be otherwise occupied, hence your overbearing presence. Tell me who would want to stalk you and your neglected family?

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

Haven’t you got a family to look after?

Yes but they are otherwise occupied at present. Nonetheless, I thank you for your concern, no matter how stalkerish.

They mostly seem to be otherwise occupied, hence your overbearing presence. Tell me who would want to stalk you and your neglected family?

You seem to be a constantly lonely and angry man, PermeateFree. Irascibility is where you hide your pain. SAD.

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Yes but they are otherwise occupied at present. Nonetheless, I thank you for your concern, no matter how stalkerish.

They mostly seem to be otherwise occupied, hence your overbearing presence. Tell me who would want to stalk you and your neglected family?

You seem to be a constantly lonely and angry man, PermeateFree. Irascibility is where you hide your pain. SAD.

I am more than happy in my isolation, it is arseholes like you that piss me off. You should try it sometime and you might find there is more satisfaction than political gossip and trivia. You really do waste your life and do so because you know no better.

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

They mostly seem to be otherwise occupied, hence your overbearing presence. Tell me who would want to stalk you and your neglected family?

You seem to be a constantly lonely and angry man, PermeateFree. Irascibility is where you hide your pain. SAD.

I am more than happy in my isolation, it is arseholes like you that piss me off. You should try it sometime and you might find there is more satisfaction than political gossip and trivia. You really do waste your life and do so because you know no better.

That’s not very nice from either of you

wait are we still talking about Silurian Period Facts about its Climate, Animals & Plants, like … an upright stalk … a few centimeters high with … small bulbous tips ¿ or has the conversation moved onto something else

Cymek said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

You seem to be a constantly lonely and angry man, PermeateFree. Irascibility is where you hide your pain. SAD.

I am more than happy in my isolation, it is arseholes like you that piss me off. You should try it sometime and you might find there is more satisfaction than political gossip and trivia. You really do waste your life and do so because you know no better.

That’s not very nice from either of you

Consider me chastened, Cymek. My branch was returned burnt, the dove roasted, the mildew silenced with the peroxide of contempt.

dv said:

Cymek said:

PermeateFree said:

I am more than happy in my isolation, it is arseholes like you that piss me off. You should try it sometime and you might find there is more satisfaction than political gossip and trivia. You really do waste your life and do so because you know no better.

That’s not very nice from either of you

Consider me chastened, Cymek. My branch was returned burnt, the dove roasted, the mildew silenced with the peroxide of contempt.

we prefer to call them a bunch of hypochlorites

SCIENCE said:

wait are we still talking about Silurian Period Facts about its Climate, Animals & Plants, like … an upright stalk … a few centimeters high with … small bulbous tips ¿ or has the conversation moved onto something else

That’s exactly what we’re talking about. Certainly we are not talking about the creatures from Doctor Who. As you probably know the Silurian period began after a major extinction event. About half of all genera disappeared from the seas. Happy to say that things bounced back quite well (as they tend to do). The first bony fish appeared in the Silurian and we all know how that went.

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Yes but they are otherwise occupied at present. Nonetheless, I thank you for your concern, no matter how stalkerish.

They mostly seem to be otherwise occupied, hence your overbearing presence. Tell me who would want to stalk you and your neglected family?

You seem to be a constantly lonely and angry man, PermeateFree. Irascibility is where you hide your pain. SAD.

PF being his usual self I see

The-Spectator said:

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

They mostly seem to be otherwise occupied, hence your overbearing presence. Tell me who would want to stalk you and your neglected family?

You seem to be a constantly lonely and angry man, PermeateFree. Irascibility is where you hide your pain. SAD.

PF being his usual self I see

I’m a little annoyed that he succeeded in dragging me down to his level, but I was unnerved by his creepy-crawly fascination with my family.

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

wait are we still talking about Silurian Period Facts about its Climate, Animals & Plants, like … an upright stalk … a few centimeters high with … small bulbous tips ¿ or has the conversation moved onto something else

That’s exactly what we’re talking about. Certainly we are not talking about the creatures from Doctor Who. As you probably know the Silurian period began after a major extinction event. About half of all genera disappeared from the seas. Happy to say that things bounced back quite well (as they tend to do). The first bony fish appeared in the Silurian and we all know how that went.

I did answer this and more in a reply to moll, just goes to show the extent of your interest. But I have known that for some time. Stick to your trivia dv, you are much better at that.

The-Spectator said:

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

They mostly seem to be otherwise occupied, hence your overbearing presence. Tell me who would want to stalk you and your neglected family?

You seem to be a constantly lonely and angry man, PermeateFree. Irascibility is where you hide your pain. SAD.

PF being his usual self I see

You should be hung, drawn and quartered. And if they are looking for someone to do it, I am willing to pay for the privilege.

dv said:

The-Spectator said:

dv said:

You seem to be a constantly lonely and angry man, PermeateFree. Irascibility is where you hide your pain. SAD.

PF being his usual self I see

I’m a little annoyed that he succeeded in dragging me down to his level, but I was unnerved by his creepy-crawly fascination with my family.

Demonising as usual dv. You should live under a rock if you don’t already. :)))

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Go read the OP if you are sufficiently interested, because I am not. I will only say that I have written about this group and it is difficult to do so. Something you need to try for yourselves because I have had it with all the silly remarks from the armchair experts around here.

So which chair do you use?

Go away roughy, I have not the patience for you right now.

Gave you a few hours relief. Feel better now?

dv said:

Look, circling back a bit…

Normally headlines like to present the most striking piece of information.

Like when YG went into orbit, the papers didn’t describe him as “The First Short Man From The Soviet Union In Space”. Narrowing the scope makes the record less interesting.

So saying that this particular thing is “The Oldest Millipede Fossil” or “The Oldest Arthropod Fossil” is less interesting and impressive than going as wide as possible, by saying it is “The Oldest Land Animal Fossil”.

Has anyone noticed we are talking in this thread, about a different thread?

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

Stop playing the martyr.

Stop playing the angry man that everybody gangs up on.

Well this is the second thread that has been trashed on the same petty little subject. Just goes to show the scientific interest here. Give them something simple to chew on, preferably presented in less than 3 lines of text and everyone wants to comment. Give them science topic and hardly anyone comments, except if there is a minor disagreement over presentation and everyone want their say, especially after being egged on by certain vindictive people who think it funny that they can stir up so much trouble.

Well fine, I know the score is, but I’ll still post scientific topics, not now to educate the ignorant, but for my own benefit and to annoy those who would wish me gone.

Nobody wishes anything of the sort. What we all wish is that you will take all of the science on board and forget the personal injury you seem to take onboard at any lighthearted guff.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

Stop playing the angry man that everybody gangs up on.

Well this is the second thread that has been trashed on the same petty little subject. Just goes to show the scientific interest here. Give them something simple to chew on, preferably presented in less than 3 lines of text and everyone wants to comment. Give them science topic and hardly anyone comments, except if there is a minor disagreement over presentation and everyone want their say, especially after being egged on by certain vindictive people who think it funny that they can stir up so much trouble.

Well fine, I know the score is, but I’ll still post scientific topics, not now to educate the ignorant, but for my own benefit and to annoy those who would wish me gone.

Nobody wishes anything of the sort. What we all wish is that you will take all of the science on board and forget the personal injury you seem to take onboard at any lighthearted guff.

There’s a SCIENCE behind that too ¡

this 車 chair

roughbarked said:

dv said:

Look, circling back a bit…

Normally headlines like to present the most striking piece of information.

Like when YG went into orbit, the papers didn’t describe him as “The First Short Man From The Soviet Union In Space”. Narrowing the scope makes the record less interesting.

So saying that this particular thing is “The Oldest Millipede Fossil” or “The Oldest Arthropod Fossil” is less interesting and impressive than going as wide as possible, by saying it is “The Oldest Land Animal Fossil”.

Has anyone noticed we are talking in this thread, about a different thread?

Yes. Perm relitigated here.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

So which chair do you use?

Go away roughy, I have not the patience for you right now.

Gave you a few hours relief. Feel better now?

Not really, you are just part of the furniture.

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Go away roughy, I have not the patience for you right now.

Gave you a few hours relief. Feel better now?

Not really, you are just part of the furniture.

right that’s it we’re calling time on this one

roughbarked said:

dv said:

Look, circling back a bit…

Normally headlines like to present the most striking piece of information.

Like when YG went into orbit, the papers didn’t describe him as “The First Short Man From The Soviet Union In Space”. Narrowing the scope makes the record less interesting.

So saying that this particular thing is “The Oldest Millipede Fossil” or “The Oldest Arthropod Fossil” is less interesting and impressive than going as wide as possible, by saying it is “The Oldest Land Animal Fossil”.

Has anyone noticed we are talking in this thread, about a different thread?

Yes and you started it, from a remark I made to dv.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

Stop playing the angry man that everybody gangs up on.

Well this is the second thread that has been trashed on the same petty little subject. Just goes to show the scientific interest here. Give them something simple to chew on, preferably presented in less than 3 lines of text and everyone wants to comment. Give them science topic and hardly anyone comments, except if there is a minor disagreement over presentation and everyone want their say, especially after being egged on by certain vindictive people who think it funny that they can stir up so much trouble.

Well fine, I know the score is, but I’ll still post scientific topics, not now to educate the ignorant, but for my own benefit and to annoy those who would wish me gone.

Nobody wishes anything of the sort. What we all wish is that you will take all of the science on board and forget the personal injury you seem to take onboard at any lighthearted guff.

And you would know? I don’t think they include you in the loop.

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Well this is the second thread that has been trashed on the same petty little subject. Just goes to show the scientific interest here. Give them something simple to chew on, preferably presented in less than 3 lines of text and everyone wants to comment. Give them science topic and hardly anyone comments, except if there is a minor disagreement over presentation and everyone want their say, especially after being egged on by certain vindictive people who think it funny that they can stir up so much trouble.

Well fine, I know the score is, but I’ll still post scientific topics, not now to educate the ignorant, but for my own benefit and to annoy those who would wish me gone.

Nobody wishes anything of the sort. What we all wish is that you will take all of the science on board and forget the personal injury you seem to take onboard at any lighthearted guff.

And you would know? I don’t think they include you in the loop.

It’s a rubber band.

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

dv said:

Look, circling back a bit…

Normally headlines like to present the most striking piece of information.

Like when YG went into orbit, the papers didn’t describe him as “The First Short Man From The Soviet Union In Space”. Narrowing the scope makes the record less interesting.

So saying that this particular thing is “The Oldest Millipede Fossil” or “The Oldest Arthropod Fossil” is less interesting and impressive than going as wide as possible, by saying it is “The Oldest Land Animal Fossil”.

Has anyone noticed we are talking in this thread, about a different thread?

Yes and you started it, from a remark I made to dv.

Here’s where it started…

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Nice article

Pleased you don’t have more petty issues with an oddly used word.

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

So now, who started it?

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Well this is the second thread that has been trashed on the same petty little subject. Just goes to show the scientific interest here. Give them something simple to chew on, preferably presented in less than 3 lines of text and everyone wants to comment. Give them science topic and hardly anyone comments, except if there is a minor disagreement over presentation and everyone want their say, especially after being egged on by certain vindictive people who think it funny that they can stir up so much trouble.

Well fine, I know the score is, but I’ll still post scientific topics, not now to educate the ignorant, but for my own benefit and to annoy those who would wish me gone.

Nobody wishes anything of the sort. What we all wish is that you will take all of the science on board and forget the personal injury you seem to take onboard at any lighthearted guff.

And you would know? I don’t think they include you in the loop.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

Nobody wishes anything of the sort. What we all wish is that you will take all of the science on board and forget the personal injury you seem to take onboard at any lighthearted guff.

And you would know? I don’t think they include you in the loop.

It’s a rubber band.

know its knot

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

Pleased you don’t have more petty issues with an oddly used word.

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

So now, who started it?

and neither of the articles were written by you yet you seemed to think you were being attacked.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

dv said:

Look, circling back a bit…

Normally headlines like to present the most striking piece of information.

Like when YG went into orbit, the papers didn’t describe him as “The First Short Man From The Soviet Union In Space”. Narrowing the scope makes the record less interesting.

So saying that this particular thing is “The Oldest Millipede Fossil” or “The Oldest Arthropod Fossil” is less interesting and impressive than going as wide as possible, by saying it is “The Oldest Land Animal Fossil”.

Has anyone noticed we are talking in this thread, about a different thread?

Yes and you started it, from a remark I made to dv.

Here’s where it started…

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

Nice article

Pleased you don’t have more petty issues with an oddly used word.

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

So now, who started it?

Chicken … Egg … Bug Millipede Kampecaris obanensis

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

Pleased you don’t have more petty issues with an oddly used word.

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

So now, who started it?

Read the next line written by you

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Nice article may well mean that it reads well without repetitive usage of a misleading cue word.

So now, who started it?

Read the next line written by you

It was started the line before but anyway, cheese and chalk. It could easily have stopped there or never started.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

So now, who started it?

Read the next line written by you

It was started the line before but anyway, cheese and chalk. It could easily have stopped there or never started.

Go away please!

PermeateFree said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Read the next line written by you

It was started the line before but anyway, cheese and chalk. It could easily have stopped there or never started.

Go away please!

If you stopped calling me back, that could well occur.

Quite alarming.

A 23 m.y. record of low atmospheric CO2

dv said:

Quite alarming.

A 23 m.y. record of low atmospheric CO2

Your session has timed out. Please go back to the article page and click the PDF link again.

I was just wanting to check when that was published.

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Quite alarming.

A 23 m.y. record of low atmospheric CO2

Your session has timed out. Please go back to the article page and click the PDF link again.

I was just wanting to check when that was published.

RESEARCH ARTICLE| MAY 29, 2020
A 23 m.y. record of low atmospheric CO2
Ying Cui; Brian A. Schubert; A. Hope Jahren
Geology (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1130/G47681.1
Article history