SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
mollwollfumble said:
Is this suitable for curing paraplegia?
He stopped short of saying that. I wonder if it’s possible to implant two devices, one in the brain and one after the spinal disruption, and get them to send electrical messages to each other.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/06/140625130137.htm
> Ian Burkhart, a 23-year-old quadriplegic from Dublin, Ohio, is the first patient to use Neurobridge, an electronic neural bypass for spinal cord injuries that reconnects the brain directly to muscles, allowing voluntary and functional control of a paralyzed limb. Burkhart is the first of a potential five participants in a clinical study.
> The Neurobridge technology combines algorithms that learn and decode the user’s brain activity and a high-definition muscle stimulation sleeve that translates neural impulses from the brain and transmits new signals to the paralyzed limb. In this case, Ian’s brain signals bypass his injured spinal cord and move his hand, hence the name Neurobridge.
Thanks. Looks like it can be done. Neurobridge rather than Neuralink.
Divine Angel said:

Hippocampus, I’m not sure. But it can have access to my frontal cortex any time it likes.
For quadriplegia you would want it to access your hippocampus.