Date: 17/09/2020 18:59:31
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620350
Subject: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Teen ‘Blasts Away’ Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet’s Laser Pointer

The dangers of staring directly into laser pointers are well documented, but an unfortunate incident involving a teenager from Ohio serves as a sobering reminder of just how little it takes to cause permanent damage to your eyes and vision.

more…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 19:04:43
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620351
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Looks like a job for molecular engineering.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 19:08:31
From: Divine Angel
ID: 1620353
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Oh well.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 19:11:40
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620356
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Divine Angel said:


Oh well.

The lasers strength doesn’t not need to be that high for indoor animal use

if people can damage their eyes, it can happen to animals too.

better to get low powered ones, keep the high powered ones expensive or requiring a licence

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 19:28:49
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620358
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Tau.Neutrino said:


Divine Angel said:

Oh well.

The lasers strength doesn’t not need to be that high for indoor animal use

if people can damage their eyes, it can happen to animals too.

better to get low powered ones, keep the high powered ones expensive or requiring a licence

I have no idea how low a laser can go or for that matter how high a laser can go in the safe range.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 19:31:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1620360
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

what about very stable geniuses that stare at solar eclipses

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 19:32:33
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620361
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

SCIENCE said:


what about very stable geniuses that stare at solar eclipses

It burnt his brain that’s for sure.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 19:33:00
From: dv
ID: 1620362
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

SCIENCE said:


what about very stable geniuses that stare at solar eclipses

Fortunately he doesn’t have a pet

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 20:10:19
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620386
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

“Handheld lasers can range in power from <5 mW (typical laser pointers) to >1,200 mW (high power blue lasers capable of lighting cigarettes or remotely igniting fireworks),

Does anyone know the safe range of light that the eye can take ?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 20:26:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1620390
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Tau.Neutrino said:


“Handheld lasers can range in power from <5 mW (typical laser pointers) to >1,200 mW (high power blue lasers capable of lighting cigarettes or remotely igniting fireworks),

Does anyone know the safe range of light that the eye can take ?

sunlight on the plains but not in the snow

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 20:31:42
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620394
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

SCIENCE said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

“Handheld lasers can range in power from <5 mW (typical laser pointers) to >1,200 mW (high power blue lasers capable of lighting cigarettes or remotely igniting fireworks),

Does anyone know the safe range of light that the eye can take ?

sunlight on the plains but not in the snow

from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222423/

The safe range of light, to avoid exposing the eye to potentially damaging UV light, is approximately 2000 to 3500K and greater than 500 nanometers. The warmer incandescent lights are usually less than 3500K and are less damaging to the eye, but they often produce light that is inadequate for concentrating at work.

But how does that translate to in laser power ? milliwatts

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 20:34:08
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620396
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Heres an interesting article

What are the limits of human vision?
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150727-what-are-the-limits-of-human-vision

doesn’t have my question or answer, Ill keep looking.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 20:38:42
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620398
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

There is intensity across the whole eye range isn’t there?

example laser colours can be any colour at 5mv upwards

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 20:50:05
From: buffy
ID: 1620399
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Tau.Neutrino said:


Teen ‘Blasts Away’ Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet’s Laser Pointer

The dangers of staring directly into laser pointers are well documented, but an unfortunate incident involving a teenager from Ohio serves as a sobering reminder of just how little it takes to cause permanent damage to your eyes and vision.

more…

>>On a subsequent visit six months later, his visual acuity was found to have improved to a normal level in both eyes, but that seemingly positive result didn’t reflect the harm done inside the eye.<<

So functionally normal. Good thing it was “only a few seconds”.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 20:52:28
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620400
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

another interesting article

LED light can damage eyes, health authority warns
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-05-eyes-health-authority.html

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 20:55:55
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620401
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Intensity in light is measured is Lux or lumens

is there some equivalent for milliwatt lasers ?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 21:03:01
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 1620403
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

https://www.ophiropt.com/blog/laser-measurement/a-quick-guide-to-optical-measurement-devices/

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 21:08:21
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620406
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Bogsnorkler said:


https://www.ophiropt.com/blog/laser-measurement/a-quick-guide-to-optical-measurement-devices/

Thanks, that’s very interesting, I’m getting closer.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 21:12:36
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620408
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Im now looking for lumen to milliwatt conversion

Lumens to watts calculator
https://www.rapidtables.com/calc/light/lumen-to-watt-calculator.html

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 21:19:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1620410
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

try retinal photic injury

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 21:24:05
From: dv
ID: 1620411
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Coupla things to take into account:

a) short wavelength EM is generally more damaging to the retina than long, at the same level of power.
b) wavelength of maximum pupillary light response is around 500 nm and it tapers off pretty sharply in the near ultraviolet. So a high temperature source, relatively rich in ultraviolets, will be dangerous as the pupil will not constrict much.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 21:24:24
From: party_pants
ID: 1620412
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

SCIENCE said:


try retinal photic injury

no thanks

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 21:42:27
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620414
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

dv said:


Coupla things to take into account:

a) short wavelength EM is generally more damaging to the retina than long, at the same level of power.
b) wavelength of maximum pupillary light response is around 500 nm and it tapers off pretty sharply in the near ultraviolet. So a high temperature source, relatively rich in ultraviolets, will be dangerous as the pupil will not constrict much.

Yes webites are saying blue to ultrvoilet is more danerous

Im finding interesting information

https://www.quora.com/Will-staring-at-a-super-bright-light-damage-your-eyes-If-so-how-many-lumens-of-light-is-it-necessary

Safe to say the amount of lumens needed to damage your eye is in the tens of thousands, as anything over 4000 will make you squint, and anything in the hundred thousands is in laser territory.

Im getting the feeling its difficult to answer because of variables

At what LUX/LUMEN LEVEL will EYE DAMAGE likely occur?…….

How many lumens/lux to cause permanent eye damage / blindness?

What is the maximum light intensity that a human eye can withstand without being damaged?
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-maximum-light-intensity-that-a-human-eye-can-withstand-without-being-damaged

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 21:46:50
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620416
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

more interesting articles

Human eye sensitivity and photometric quantities
https://www.ecse.rpi.edu/~schubert/Light-Emitting-Diodes-dot-org/Sample-Chapter.pdf

The All Important 1,000 LUX Rule
https://endmyopia.org/the-all-important-1000-lux-rule/

How much energy is required to blind someone?
https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/19789/how-much-energy-is-required-to-blind-someone

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 22:04:29
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620424
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

one way to help with this problem is building in a range finder like on cameras but built into the laser pointer so that it doesn’t work on short distances only longer distances

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 22:23:35
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620435
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Tau.Neutrino said:


one way to help with this problem is building in a range finder like on cameras but built into the laser pointer so that it doesn’t work on short distances only longer distances

It would add a little cost to making the laser pointer but would make it safer to use

close sensing devices are getting cheaper and are getting better at their jobs

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 22:26:58
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620437
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

the variables are listed here

From: Bogsnorkler link

https://www.ophiropt.com/blog/laser-measurement/a-quick-guide-to-optical-measurement-devices/

Radiometry versus Photometry

Let’s start with something concrete and easily defined. There are two ways to analyze light:

Radiometrically – this refers to the objective measure of light, not dependent on the subject (viewer) or the wavelength. Radiometry uses the classic units likeWatts (power) and Joules (energy). Photometrically – this refers to the subjective measure of light, as seen by the human eye. As such, all wavelengths other than visible will be measured as zero. The three most commonly-used photometric units are:

A. Lumen (lm) to measure “luminous flux” which is analogous to radiometric power

B. Candela (cd) to measure “luminous intensity” which is flux in a specific direction . (solid angle).

C. Lux to measure “luminance” which is flux that hits a given area.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 23:12:24
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620452
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

This is why I am so far

If my facts are right, around 1000 lux is light sitting in the shade on a sunny day

4000 lux and above is considered dangerous

There are variables involved because of intensity, distance and area.

Sunlight falls on half the planet

Lasers are concentrated beams

from the first post

“Handheld lasers can range in power from <5 mW (typical laser pointers) to >1,200 mW (high power blue lasers capable of lighting cigarettes or remotely igniting fireworks),

the Lumens to watts calculator requires two inputs to require an answer.

Enter luminous flux in lumens:
enter luminous efficacy in lumens per watt:

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 23:51:24
From: boppa
ID: 1620464
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Problem is that you can turn a readily available non handheld laser into a handheld(ish) one quite readily, just add 12v and you can get up around 30w
I have two over 5 W and and am waiting for a third rated at 30w for the cnc for cutting timber

Reply Quote

Date: 17/09/2020 23:55:38
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1620465
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

boppa said:


Problem is that you can turn a readily available non handheld laser into a handheld(ish) one quite readily, just add 12v and you can get up around 30w
I have two over 5 W and and am waiting for a third rated at 30w for the cnc for cutting timber

Yes electronic fidlers can do lots of tricks.

I meant the general retail market.

I find the science interesting. Learning on the fly is interesting too.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/09/2020 01:28:32
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1620489
Subject: re: Teen 'Blasts Away' Parts of Retina by Staring Into a Pet's Laser Pointer

Tau.Neutrino said:


“Handheld lasers can range in power from <5 mW (typical laser pointers) to >1,200 mW (high power blue lasers capable of lighting cigarettes or remotely igniting fireworks),

Does anyone know the safe range of light that the eye can take ?

There is an international standard that deals with this, I think. For the USA it’s ANSI Z136.

The key is how much energy is absorbed by the retina before the blink reflex (glare aversion response to bright lights) takes effect. The blink reflex takes around 0.1 seconds according to wikipedia.

Would the blink reflex react to an IR laser? I think it would, thoungh not perhaps as fast as as optical laser.

“Class 2. A Class 2 laser is considered to be safe because the blink reflex will limit the exposure to no more than 0.25 seconds. It only applies to visible-light lasers (400–700 nm). Class-2 lasers are limited to 1 mW continuous wave”. Laser pointers are supposed to be Class 2 lasers, but I have seen an old study where several laser pointers bought off ebay had a measured brightness exceeding the 1 mW limit. Do not stare into laser.

Maximum permissible exposure (MPE) at the cornea for a collimated laser beam according to IEC 60825, as energy density versus exposure time for various wavelengths.

Have a look at this graph, and feed in 0.25 seconds. For optical frequencies the maximum permissible exposure is 6e-4 joules per square cm.

“A Class 3R laser is considered safe if handled carefully, with restricted beam viewing. With a class 3R laser, the MPE can be exceeded, but with a low risk of injury. Visible continuous lasers in Class 3R are limited to 5 mW.”

Reply Quote