> do I need consult a committed full-time nudist hobo for an answer
There are historical records.
Let’s skip “thoughts” for the moment, and look to see if there is a close analogy between washing clothes and bathing.
Before bathing, people used to immerse themselves in water for three reasons.
- Hunting (fish, snakes, ducks, clams, seals, etc.)
- Crossing flood water.
- For fun, which can be typified as trying to drown siblings.
Clothes appeared in the historical record before both bathing and laundering.
Bathing and laundering seem to have appeared at the same time.
For example, an aboriginal lethario who went naked all the time in the bush would wash his clothes and himself to look and smell as nice as possible when going into town in search of female companionship.
I wonder if bathing-laundering originated as a way to hide the breaking of laws. In much the same way that a person might wipe fingerprints off a door handle, a person might bathe-launder to hide the scent of an affair, or to hide the distinctive smell resulting from the breaking of food taboos, or bathe-launder in order to break nudity taboos.
> the desire to have washed clothes would be much reduced if there was no desire to wash thoughts
The first question really is whether people wash thoughts at all. Do they “wonderful civilizing development, the acquirement of different thought items, washing them, hanging them on the line to dry, putting them away in the cupboard in the right place for later use. Clean thoughts, the right thoughts when you need them”.
Such, perhaps, as a politician using different thoughts-words in public to those in the vicious no holds barred fighting of the party room?
Well, then, the link may be that thought laundering also originated as a way to hide the breaking of laws and taboos.
I don’t actually do either.