Date: 16/10/2020 02:12:04
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1633874
Subject: Deforestation in Australia: How does your state (or territory) compare?

The amount of land has been cleared, right across Australia, from 2010 until the most recently available data in 2018.

Imagine a strip of land 1-kilometre wide, and 15-kilometres long — that’s equivalent to the 1500 hectares cleared in the ACT.

NT This time our 1-kilometre-wide piece of cleared land would stretch 318km, say from Canberra to just beyond Sydney.

If we convert Tasmania’s 66,500 cleared hectares to a 1-kilometre-wide strip of land, it would be 665-kilometres long or the distance from Melbourne to Canberra.

If we go back to our 1-kilometre-wide strip of land, South Australia’s total clearing stretches almost 1,100km from Newcastle to Melbourne.

Victoria This time our 1-kilometre-wide piece of land would stretch from Hobart to the southern suburbs or Brisbane.

WA In total that roughly equals a 1-kilometre-wide piece of land 2,884 kilometres long or from Darwin to Adelaide with change.

NSW That makes our 1-kilometre wide strip of cleared land almost 7,000 kilometres long, roughly stretching from Perth to Cairns via Brisbane.

Qld Our 1km wide strip of cleared land would stretch for a whopping 24,466 kilometres — roughly all the way around Australia twice (minus Tassie).

Australia is a world leader in chopping down trees and wiping out animals: two questionable accomplishments that are tightly connected.

Land clearing and habitat loss are the biggest drivers of animal extinction and in recent years, Australia’s aggressive rate of land clearing has ranked among the developed world’s fastest.

So despite our reputation for untamed wilderness and charismatic wildlife, it’s perhaps no surprise that Australia has one of the highest rates of animal extinction in the world.

We’ve driven 29 mammals to extinction since European colonisation and more than 1,700 others are threatened or endangered. The once abundant koala is rapidly vanishing from New South Wales and Queensland.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2020-10-08/deforestation-land-clearing-australia-state-by-state/12535438

Reply Quote

Date: 16/10/2020 06:44:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 1633881
Subject: re: Deforestation in Australia: How does your state (or territory) compare?

It has been a horror movie. When will it end?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/10/2020 10:44:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 1633948
Subject: re: Deforestation in Australia: How does your state (or territory) compare?

We recently also had this news headline.

Native seed collection and propagation the next boom industry, researcher says – ABC News https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-09/native-seed-collection-and-propagation-the-next-boom-industry/12733242

While I see examples like this on eBay where most of these seeds will end up wasted.

https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Prostrate-Banksia-Banksia-petiolaris-5-Seeds-/153720060044

Reply Quote

Date: 16/10/2020 11:28:09
From: Michael V
ID: 1633974
Subject: re: Deforestation in Australia: How does your state (or territory) compare?

Also consider this article, which includes a link to The Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Index (where Australia is shown to be doing quite poorly):

https://www.sciencealert.com/chilling-new-report-shows-1-out-of-5-countries-headed-for-ecosystem-collapse

Reply Quote

Date: 16/10/2020 14:05:15
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1634107
Subject: re: Deforestation in Australia: How does your state (or territory) compare?

Trying … to … avoid … kneejerk … reaction.

1. Cleared for what. It matters a hell of a lot. Whether it is for orchards, logging, animal grazing, residence, bushfire prevention. The only one of those that is really objectionable is clearance for animal grazing – which definitely needs to be minimised.

2. Compared to places like Sarawak, the land clearance in Australia is totally negligible. Compared to tree planting in China, land clearance in Australia is laughably minuscule.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/10/2020 14:09:08
From: dv
ID: 1634111
Subject: re: Deforestation in Australia: How does your state (or territory) compare?

mollwollfumble said:


Trying … to … avoid … kneejerk … reaction.

1. Cleared for what.

Takeoff

Reply Quote

Date: 16/10/2020 14:11:40
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1634117
Subject: re: Deforestation in Australia: How does your state (or territory) compare?

dv said:


mollwollfumble said:

Trying … to … avoid … kneejerk … reaction.

1. Cleared for what.

Takeoff

It’s already landed. The period of land clearance in Australia lasted from about 1850 to 1950.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/10/2020 16:05:06
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1634147
Subject: re: Deforestation in Australia: How does your state (or territory) compare?

mollwollfumble said:


Trying … to … avoid … kneejerk … reaction.

1. Cleared for what. It matters a hell of a lot. Whether it is for orchards, logging, animal grazing, residence, bushfire prevention. The only one of those that is really objectionable is clearance for animal grazing – which definitely needs to be minimised.

2. Compared to places like Sarawak, the land clearance in Australia is totally negligible. Compared to tree planting in China, land clearance in Australia is laughably minuscule.

Can’t be bothered replying to such crass comment.

Reply Quote