Date: 21/10/2020 15:42:16
From: Michael V
ID: 1636712
Subject: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

Medical researchers have made a surprise anatomical discovery, finding what looks to be a mysterious set of salivary glands hidden inside the human head – which somehow have been missed by scientists for centuries up until now.

This “unknown entity” was identified by accident by doctors in the Netherlands, who were examining prostate cancer patients with an advanced type of scan called PSMA PET/CT. When paired with injections of radioactive glucose, this diagnostic tool highlights tumours in the body.

In this case, however, it showed up something else entirely, nestled in the rear of the nasopharynx, and quite the long-time lurker.

……………………………………………………………………….

Wow! Unexpected.
……………………………………………………………………….

For more, and a short video:

https://www.sciencealert.com/chance-discovery-reveals-mysterious-organ-lurking-in-human-head-missed-for-centuries

The complete scientific paper:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814020308094

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 15:48:38
From: Michael V
ID: 1636713
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

Michael V said:


Medical researchers have made a surprise anatomical discovery, finding what looks to be a mysterious set of salivary glands hidden inside the human head – which somehow have been missed by scientists for centuries up until now.

This “unknown entity” was identified by accident by doctors in the Netherlands, who were examining prostate cancer patients with an advanced type of scan called PSMA PET/CT. When paired with injections of radioactive glucose, this diagnostic tool highlights tumours in the body.

In this case, however, it showed up something else entirely, nestled in the rear of the nasopharynx, and quite the long-time lurker.

……………………………………………………………………….

Wow! Unexpected.
……………………………………………………………………….

For more, and a short video:

https://www.sciencealert.com/chance-discovery-reveals-mysterious-organ-lurking-in-human-head-missed-for-centuries

The complete scientific paper:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814020308094

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 15:50:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 1636715
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

Interesting. So instead of only three, I have five?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 15:53:00
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1636717
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

Michael V said:


Medical researchers have made a surprise anatomical discovery, finding what looks to be a mysterious set of salivary glands hidden inside the human head – which somehow have been missed by scientists for centuries up until now.

That’s a relief.

I saw the headline, and thought some ENT surgeon might have had a few bits left over after an operation.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 15:54:31
From: Michael V
ID: 1636718
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

roughbarked said:


Interesting. So instead of only three, I have five?

Three sets of salivary glands is now four sets.

They are bilaterally paired.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 15:55:38
From: Michael V
ID: 1636719
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

captain_spalding said:


Michael V said:

Medical researchers have made a surprise anatomical discovery, finding what looks to be a mysterious set of salivary glands hidden inside the human head – which somehow have been missed by scientists for centuries up until now.

That’s a relief.

I saw the headline, and thought some ENT surgeon might have had a few bits left over after an operation.

Yair…

G’donya.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 15:57:01
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1636720
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

Michael V said:


captain_spalding said:

Michael V said:

Medical researchers have made a surprise anatomical discovery, finding what looks to be a mysterious set of salivary glands hidden inside the human head – which somehow have been missed by scientists for centuries up until now.

That’s a relief.

I saw the headline, and thought some ENT surgeon might have had a few bits left over after an operation.

Yair…

G’donya.

Just goes to show, science is an ongoing process.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 15:58:29
From: sarahs mum
ID: 1636721
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

Michael V said:


Medical researchers have made a surprise anatomical discovery, finding what looks to be a mysterious set of salivary glands hidden inside the human head – which somehow have been missed by scientists for centuries up until now.

This “unknown entity” was identified by accident by doctors in the Netherlands, who were examining prostate cancer patients with an advanced type of scan called PSMA PET/CT. When paired with injections of radioactive glucose, this diagnostic tool highlights tumours in the body.

In this case, however, it showed up something else entirely, nestled in the rear of the nasopharynx, and quite the long-time lurker.

……………………………………………………………………….

Wow! Unexpected.
……………………………………………………………………….

For more, and a short video:

https://www.sciencealert.com/chance-discovery-reveals-mysterious-organ-lurking-in-human-head-missed-for-centuries

The complete scientific paper:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814020308094

Dig it.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 16:00:35
From: Michael V
ID: 1636722
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

captain_spalding said:


Michael V said:

captain_spalding said:

That’s a relief.

I saw the headline, and thought some ENT surgeon might have had a few bits left over after an operation.

Yair…

G’donya.

Just goes to show, science is an ongoing process.

Most definitely.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 16:03:28
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1636724
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

Makes you wonder how anyone discovered that the salivary glands of certain fruit flies contain giant chromosomes.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 16:11:50
From: sibeen
ID: 1636725
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

Michael V said:


captain_spalding said:

Michael V said:

Yair…

G’donya.

Just goes to show, science is an ongoing process.

Most definitely.

All science is wrong!!!!

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 16:15:25
From: Michael V
ID: 1636727
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

captain_spalding said:

Just goes to show, science is an ongoing process.

Most definitely.

All science is wrong!!!!

Blast from the past…

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 18:43:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 1636769
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

Michael V said:


roughbarked said:

Interesting. So instead of only three, I have five?

Three sets of salivary glands is now four sets.

They are bilaterally paired.

Oh but one of my front pair is missing in action.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 18:47:53
From: Michael V
ID: 1636775
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

roughbarked said:


Michael V said:

roughbarked said:

Interesting. So instead of only three, I have five?

Three sets of salivary glands is now four sets.

They are bilaterally paired.

Oh but one of my front pair is missing in action.

I have one mia, too. As does Aviator Bill.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 19:04:00
From: monkey skipper
ID: 1636781
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

roughbarked said:


Michael V said:

roughbarked said:

Interesting. So instead of only three, I have five?

Three sets of salivary glands is now four sets.

They are bilaterally paired.

Oh but one of my front pair is missing in action.

I wondered if this also has something to do with taste since the majority of taste is via the nose anyway?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/10/2020 21:39:42
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1636835
Subject: re: Two extra human salivary glands discovered.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

captain_spalding said:

Just goes to show, science is an ongoing process.

Most definitely.

All science is wrong!!!!

You only just discovered that?

Reply Quote