Date: 23/10/2020 22:39:55
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1637872
Subject: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

Which other bridges around the world most resemble the Sydney Harbour bridge?

Notre-Dame Bridge, Manchester

Hell Gate Bridge, New York

Other?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/10/2020 22:51:36
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1637876
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

mollwollfumble said:


Which other bridges around the world most resemble the Sydney Harbour bridge?

Notre-Dame Bridge, Manchester

Hell Gate Bridge, New York

Other?

Well there’s the one in Newcastle (UK), which was the scale model for the Sydney version.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/10/2020 22:54:17
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1637880
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

Newcastle

Reply Quote

Date: 23/10/2020 22:55:55
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1637882
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

The Rev Dodgson said:


Newcastle


Golly, yes!

Reply Quote

Date: 23/10/2020 23:00:02
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1637883
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

mollwollfumble said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Newcastle


Golly, yes!

Also the Bayonne Bridge, which was started after Sydney, but they finished earlier, and made it 6 inches longer or something:

Reply Quote

Date: 23/10/2020 23:02:14
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1637884
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

mollwollfumble said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Newcastle


Golly, yes!

The UK designer of Newcastle and Sydney Harbour was Sir Ralph Freeman, and his company provided me with my first job after university.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/10/2020 23:08:43
From: party_pants
ID: 1637891
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

The original Bayonne Bridge in New Jersey USA. Completed about a year earlier than the SHB and was about 5 metres longer. The steel arch looked very similar but did not have the solid stone towers at either end. Because structurally the towers don’t really add anything to the bridge design, they are more aesthetic or at most give confidence to people using the bridge.

Can’t find a decent photo of it because after a while the port authority decided to raise the deck level to allow bigger ships to pass underneath.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 09:47:38
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1637997
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

party_pants said:


The original Bayonne Bridge in New Jersey USA. Completed about a year earlier than the SHB and was about 5 metres longer. The steel arch looked very similar but did not have the solid stone towers at either end. Because structurally the towers don’t really add anything to the bridge design, they are more aesthetic or at most give confidence to people using the bridge.

Can’t find a decent photo of it because after a while the port authority decided to raise the deck level to allow bigger ships to pass underneath.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayonne_Bridge

The raising of the deck level was quite recent (completed 2019). I hadn’t heard about it before.

Lots of pictures on the net from before the raising though (including the one I posted in this thread).

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 10:44:47
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1638012
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

party_pants said:


The original Bayonne Bridge in New Jersey USA. Completed about a year earlier than the SHB and was about 5 metres longer. The steel arch looked very similar but did not have the solid stone towers at either end. Because structurally the towers don’t really add anything to the bridge design, they are more aesthetic or at most give confidence to people using the bridge.

Can’t find a decent photo of it because after a while the port authority decided to raise the deck level to allow bigger ships to pass underneath.

Oh, so that’s why Bayonne Bridge looked different in the top hits from Google.

About the SHB itself. The original sketches show a design similar to the Story Bridge in Brisbane. I had thought that that would have been better until my father in law (an old Main Roads Engineer) explained it to me just two years ago. It was changed to a steel arch in order to get a sharper curvature of approach at the Southern end. The Story Bridge design can’t accommodate curved approaches.

The SHB used to hold the Guinness World Record for the widest long span bridge.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 10:50:42
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1638013
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

mollwollfumble said:


party_pants said:

The original Bayonne Bridge in New Jersey USA. Completed about a year earlier than the SHB and was about 5 metres longer. The steel arch looked very similar but did not have the solid stone towers at either end. Because structurally the towers don’t really add anything to the bridge design, they are more aesthetic or at most give confidence to people using the bridge.

Can’t find a decent photo of it because after a while the port authority decided to raise the deck level to allow bigger ships to pass underneath.

Oh, so that’s why Bayonne Bridge looked different in the top hits from Google.

About the SHB itself. The original sketches show a design similar to the Story Bridge in Brisbane. I had thought that that would have been better until my father in law (an old Main Roads Engineer) explained it to me just two years ago. It was changed to a steel arch in order to get a sharper curvature of approach at the Southern end. The Story Bridge design can’t accommodate curved approaches.

The SHB used to hold the Guinness World Record for the widest long span bridge.

Oh, and those useless stone pillars on either end of the SHB proved useful in WWII as sites for gun emplacements.

Which makes me wonder if the useless steel pillars on the Bolte Bridge (shown below) are intended for a similar use.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 11:12:56
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1638017
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

mollwollfumble said:


The Story Bridge design can’t accommodate curved approaches.

That’s odd.

A map of the area shows a rather curved approach to the Story Bridge at the northern end.

https://mapcarta.com/N7779549471

All the old-time pics i’ve seen of the bridge indicate that it was always so.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 11:27:23
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1638020
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

captain_spalding said:


mollwollfumble said:

The Story Bridge design can’t accommodate curved approaches.

That’s odd.

A map of the area shows a rather curved approach to the Story Bridge at the northern end.

https://mapcarta.com/N7779549471

All the old-time pics i’ve seen of the bridge indicate that it was always so.

The back span from the towers needs to be on the same straight alignment as the central span. The curve at the northern end of the Story Bridge starts at the end of the back span.

How significant that was in the choice of an arch for Sydney Harbour, I don’t no. Looking at the plan now, it looks like a reasonable length back span could have been accommodated if they had chosen to go that way.

I’ve read a book on the design process, but I don’t recall the details.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 11:31:04
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1638021
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

The Rev Dodgson said:


captain_spalding said:

mollwollfumble said:

The Story Bridge design can’t accommodate curved approaches.

That’s odd.

A map of the area shows a rather curved approach to the Story Bridge at the northern end.

https://mapcarta.com/N7779549471

All the old-time pics i’ve seen of the bridge indicate that it was always so.

The back span from the towers needs to be on the same straight alignment as the central span. The curve at the northern end of the Story Bridge starts at the end of the back span.

How significant that was in the choice of an arch for Sydney Harbour, I don’t no. Looking at the plan now, it looks like a reasonable length back span could have been accommodated if they had chosen to go that way.

I’ve read a book on the design process, but I don’t recall the details.

The first Sydney Harbour Bridge design

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 11:37:54
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1638022
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

The Rev Dodgson said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

captain_spalding said:

That’s odd.

A map of the area shows a rather curved approach to the Story Bridge at the northern end.

https://mapcarta.com/N7779549471

All the old-time pics i’ve seen of the bridge indicate that it was always so.

The back span from the towers needs to be on the same straight alignment as the central span. The curve at the northern end of the Story Bridge starts at the end of the back span.

How significant that was in the choice of an arch for Sydney Harbour, I don’t no. Looking at the plan now, it looks like a reasonable length back span could have been accommodated if they had chosen to go that way.

I’ve read a book on the design process, but I don’t recall the details.

The first Sydney Harbour Bridge design

Glad they didn’t build that crappy-looking thing.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 11:43:59
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1638024
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

The Rev Dodgson said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

captain_spalding said:

That’s odd.

A map of the area shows a rather curved approach to the Story Bridge at the northern end.

https://mapcarta.com/N7779549471

All the old-time pics i’ve seen of the bridge indicate that it was always so.

The back span from the towers needs to be on the same straight alignment as the central span. The curve at the northern end of the Story Bridge starts at the end of the back span.

How significant that was in the choice of an arch for Sydney Harbour, I don’t no. Looking at the plan now, it looks like a reasonable length back span could have been accommodated if they had chosen to go that way.

I’ve read a book on the design process, but I don’t recall the details.

The first Sydney Harbour Bridge design

I think the portion of road over both the SHB and the Story bridge is called the Bradfield highway after the chap who built them.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 11:48:44
From: Michael V
ID: 1638026
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

Peak Warming Man said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

The back span from the towers needs to be on the same straight alignment as the central span. The curve at the northern end of the Story Bridge starts at the end of the back span.

How significant that was in the choice of an arch for Sydney Harbour, I don’t no. Looking at the plan now, it looks like a reasonable length back span could have been accommodated if they had chosen to go that way.

I’ve read a book on the design process, but I don’t recall the details.

The first Sydney Harbour Bridge design

I think the portion of road over both the SHB and the Story bridge is called the Bradfield highway after the chap who built them.

Sort of…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bradfield_(engineer)

John Job Crew Bradfield CMG (26 December 1867 – 23 September 1943) was an Australian engineer best known as the chief proponent of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, of which he oversaw both the design and construction. He worked for the New South Wales Department of Public Works from 1891 to 1933, although he was a Queenslander by birth.

He was the first recipient of an engineering doctorate from the University of Sydney.

Other notable projects with which he was associated include the Cataract Dam (completed 1907), the Burrinjuck Dam (completed 1928), and Brisbane’s Story Bridge (completed 1940). The Harbour Bridge formed only one component of the City Circle, Bradfield’s grand scheme for the railways of central Sydney, a modified version of which was completed after his death.

He was also the designer of an unbuilt irrigation project known as the Bradfield Scheme, which proposed that remote areas of western Queensland and north-eastern South Australia could be made fertile by the diversion of rivers from North Queensland.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 12:08:18
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1638033
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

I’ve long been a fan of this Märklin tinplate arched railway bridge from early last century.

Was planning to make a similar one from scratch but there’s a cheap laser-cut model I could use for the arched span, and make the rest myself (lower mock-up picture).

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 12:14:11
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1638038
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

Michael V said:


Peak Warming Man said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

The first Sydney Harbour Bridge design

I think the portion of road over both the SHB and the Story bridge is called the Bradfield highway after the chap who built them.

Sort of…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bradfield_(engineer)

John Job Crew Bradfield CMG (26 December 1867 – 23 September 1943) was an Australian engineer best known as the chief proponent of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, of which he oversaw both the design and construction. He worked for the New South Wales Department of Public Works from 1891 to 1933, although he was a Queenslander by birth.

He was the first recipient of an engineering doctorate from the University of Sydney.

Other notable projects with which he was associated include the Cataract Dam (completed 1907), the Burrinjuck Dam (completed 1928), and Brisbane’s Story Bridge (completed 1940). The Harbour Bridge formed only one component of the City Circle, Bradfield’s grand scheme for the railways of central Sydney, a modified version of which was completed after his death.

He was also the designer of an unbuilt irrigation project known as the Bradfield Scheme, which proposed that remote areas of western Queensland and north-eastern South Australia could be made fertile by the diversion of rivers from North Queensland.

There’s a good deal of controversy about how much credit should go to Bradfield for the design, and how much to Freeman, but let’s not go into that :)

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 12:24:39
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1638040
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

A bridge with a bit of history in Brisbane is the Walter Taylor bridge, it’s a suspension bridge.

Wiki.
The bridge is a similar design to the Hercilio Luz Bridge in Florianópolis, Brazil, with the truss carrying the bridge being above the roadway and meeting the cables at non-uniform heights. This means that the suspension cables actually form the top chord of the truss, and this configuration is known as the Steinman (after its inventor) or Florianópolis type.
The bridge is unique among Brisbane bridges in that the two towers of the bridge house residential accommodation, which were occupied until mid 2010 when the last members of the original tollmaster’s family moved out.

The bridge is a suspension bridge and the support cables were actually surplus support cables used to hold up the incomplete halves of the Sydney Harbour Bridge during its construction. When the bridge opened it had the longest span of any suspension bridge in Australia. .

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 12:31:46
From: Michael V
ID: 1638041
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

Peak Warming Man said:


A bridge with a bit of history in Brisbane is the Walter Taylor bridge, it’s a suspension bridge.

Wiki.
The bridge is a similar design to the Hercilio Luz Bridge in Florianópolis, Brazil, with the truss carrying the bridge being above the roadway and meeting the cables at non-uniform heights. This means that the suspension cables actually form the top chord of the truss, and this configuration is known as the Steinman (after its inventor) or Florianópolis type.
The bridge is unique among Brisbane bridges in that the two towers of the bridge house residential accommodation, which were occupied until mid 2010 when the last members of the original tollmaster’s family moved out.

The bridge is a suspension bridge and the support cables were actually surplus support cables used to hold up the incomplete halves of the Sydney Harbour Bridge during its construction. When the bridge opened it had the longest span of any suspension bridge in Australia. .

Ah, the Indro bridge.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 12:38:00
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1638042
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

Peak Warming Man said:


A bridge with a bit of history in Brisbane is the Walter Taylor bridge, it’s a suspension bridge.

Wiki.
The bridge is a similar design to the Hercilio Luz Bridge in Florianópolis, Brazil, with the truss carrying the bridge being above the roadway and meeting the cables at non-uniform heights. This means that the suspension cables actually form the top chord of the truss, and this configuration is known as the Steinman (after its inventor) or Florianópolis type.
The bridge is unique among Brisbane bridges in that the two towers of the bridge house residential accommodation, which were occupied until mid 2010 when the last members of the original tollmaster’s family moved out.

The bridge is a suspension bridge and the support cables were actually surplus support cables used to hold up the incomplete halves of the Sydney Harbour Bridge during its construction. When the bridge opened it had the longest span of any suspension bridge in Australia. .

That bridge has somehow evaded my consciousness up to now.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/10/2020 12:45:41
From: btm
ID: 1638045
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

Peak Warming Man said:


A bridge with a bit of history in Brisbane is the Walter Taylor bridge, it’s a suspension bridge.

Wiki.
The bridge is a similar design to the Hercilio Luz Bridge in Florianópolis, Brazil, with the truss carrying the bridge being above the roadway and meeting the cables at non-uniform heights. This means that the suspension cables actually form the top chord of the truss, and this configuration is known as the Steinman (after its inventor) or Florianópolis type.
The bridge is unique among Brisbane bridges in that the two towers of the bridge house residential accommodation, which were occupied until mid 2010 when the last members of the original tollmaster’s family moved out.

The bridge is a suspension bridge and the support cables were actually surplus support cables used to hold up the incomplete halves of the Sydney Harbour Bridge during its construction. When the bridge opened it had the longest span of any suspension bridge in Australia. .

There’s also the King’s Way bridge in Melbourne; not a particularly spectacular design as bridges go, but it partially collapsed in 1962.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/10/2020 10:05:32
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1639621
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

The Rev Dodgson said:


Peak Warming Man said:

A bridge with a bit of history in Brisbane is the Walter Taylor bridge, it’s a suspension bridge.

Wiki.
The bridge is a similar design to the Hercilio Luz Bridge in Florianópolis, Brazil, with the truss carrying the bridge being above the roadway and meeting the cables at non-uniform heights. This means that the suspension cables actually form the top chord of the truss, and this configuration is known as the Steinman (after its inventor) or Florianópolis type.
The bridge is unique among Brisbane bridges in that the two towers of the bridge house residential accommodation, which were occupied until mid 2010 when the last members of the original tollmaster’s family moved out.

The bridge is a suspension bridge and the support cables were actually surplus support cables used to hold up the incomplete halves of the Sydney Harbour Bridge during its construction. When the bridge opened it had the longest span of any suspension bridge in Australia. .

That bridge has somehow evaded my consciousness up to now.

Ditto. How could I have missed it?
A combination of suspension and truss has been proposed for the Gibraltar Bribge.
And here we have an example already in Walter Taylor. I can’t see a good side-on view of it on the web. :-(

> There’s also the King’s Way bridge in Melbourne; not a particularly spectacular design as bridges go, but it partially collapsed in 1962.

I’m not sure which bridge this is.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/10/2020 10:22:12
From: Michael V
ID: 1639631
Subject: re: Not the sydney harbour bridge?

mollwollfumble said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Peak Warming Man said:

A bridge with a bit of history in Brisbane is the Walter Taylor bridge, it’s a suspension bridge.

Wiki.
The bridge is a similar design to the Hercilio Luz Bridge in Florianópolis, Brazil, with the truss carrying the bridge being above the roadway and meeting the cables at non-uniform heights. This means that the suspension cables actually form the top chord of the truss, and this configuration is known as the Steinman (after its inventor) or Florianópolis type.
The bridge is unique among Brisbane bridges in that the two towers of the bridge house residential accommodation, which were occupied until mid 2010 when the last members of the original tollmaster’s family moved out.

The bridge is a suspension bridge and the support cables were actually surplus support cables used to hold up the incomplete halves of the Sydney Harbour Bridge during its construction. When the bridge opened it had the longest span of any suspension bridge in Australia. .

That bridge has somehow evaded my consciousness up to now.

Ditto. How could I have missed it?
A combination of suspension and truss has been proposed for the Gibraltar Bribge.
And here we have an example already in Walter Taylor. I can’t see a good side-on view of it on the web. :-(

> There’s also the King’s Way bridge in Melbourne; not a particularly spectacular design as bridges go, but it partially collapsed in 1962.

I’m not sure which bridge this is.

King Street Bridge.

Reply Quote