https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/
Your considered thoughts please.
https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/
Your considered thoughts please.
Idealism at best, before the coronavirus but maybe a new world is coming.
I don’t want a Free Trial I want a Fair Trial.
Peak Warming Man said:
![]()
I don’t want a Free Trial I want a Fair Trial.
Like
ChrispenEvan said:
https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/Your considered thoughts please.
> World Economic Forum
At least that sets the stage. Not political, environmental or health – economy.
> Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities …
Ahem, a bit up themselves?
> The Great Reset agenda would have three main components.
> At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action …
See my thread on should governments balance their budgets.
The Heinlein economic scheme was from when Heinlein was running for public office in the USA. He missed being elected by the slimmest of margins.
The economic scheme was not invented by him. “The economic program that Heinlein advocates is not original to him. It goes by the name of Social Credit”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit
Tax and public debt are, in the long term, irrelevant. Tax is only useful as a method of redistributing wealth between people.
> The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.
OK, so they’re promoting perpetual motion here.
> The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (biomedical revolution).
Hmm.
What they’re advocating may be very much worthwhile, I’m not equipped to know.
But if it involves more unnecessary legislation or wastage of human and non-human resources then I wouldn’t support it.
mollwollfumble said:
ChrispenEvan said:
https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/Your considered thoughts please.
> World Economic Forum
At least that sets the stage. Not political, environmental or health – economy.
> Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities …
Ahem, a bit up themselves?
> The Great Reset agenda would have three main components.
> At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action …
See my thread on should governments balance their budgets.
The Heinlein economic scheme was from when Heinlein was running for public office in the USA. He missed being elected by the slimmest of margins.
The economic scheme was not invented by him. “The economic program that Heinlein advocates is not original to him. It goes by the name of Social Credit”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_creditTax and public debt are, in the long term, irrelevant. Tax is only useful as a method of redistributing wealth between people.
> The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.
OK, so they’re promoting perpetual motion here.
> The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (biomedical revolution).
Hmm.
What they’re advocating may be very much worthwhile, I’m not equipped to know.
But if it involves more unnecessary legislation or wastage of human and non-human resources then I wouldn’t support it.
But strangely every single country that has financed government activities on that basis has ended up with triple digit inflation, or worse.
I suppose they just weren’t doing it right.
The Rev Dodgson said:
mollwollfumble said:
ChrispenEvan said:
https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/Your considered thoughts please.
> World Economic Forum
At least that sets the stage. Not political, environmental or health – economy.
> Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities …
Ahem, a bit up themselves?
> The Great Reset agenda would have three main components.
> At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action …
See my thread on should governments balance their budgets.
The Heinlein economic scheme was from when Heinlein was running for public office in the USA. He missed being elected by the slimmest of margins.
The economic scheme was not invented by him. “The economic program that Heinlein advocates is not original to him. It goes by the name of Social Credit”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_creditTax and public debt are, in the long term, irrelevant. Tax is only useful as a method of redistributing wealth between people.
> The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.
OK, so they’re promoting perpetual motion here.
> The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (biomedical revolution).
Hmm.
What they’re advocating may be very much worthwhile, I’m not equipped to know.
But if it involves more unnecessary legislation or wastage of human and non-human resources then I wouldn’t support it.
But strangely every single country that has financed government activities on that basis has ended up with triple digit inflation, or worse.
I suppose they just weren’t doing it right.
Correct. They weren’t doing it right.
mollwollfumble said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
mollwollfumble said:> World Economic Forum
At least that sets the stage. Not political, environmental or health – economy.
> Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities …
Ahem, a bit up themselves?
> The Great Reset agenda would have three main components.
> At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action …
See my thread on should governments balance their budgets.
The Heinlein economic scheme was from when Heinlein was running for public office in the USA. He missed being elected by the slimmest of margins.
The economic scheme was not invented by him. “The economic program that Heinlein advocates is not original to him. It goes by the name of Social Credit”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_creditTax and public debt are, in the long term, irrelevant. Tax is only useful as a method of redistributing wealth between people.
> The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.
OK, so they’re promoting perpetual motion here.
> The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (biomedical revolution).
Hmm.
What they’re advocating may be very much worthwhile, I’m not equipped to know.
But if it involves more unnecessary legislation or wastage of human and non-human resources then I wouldn’t support it.
But strangely every single country that has financed government activities on that basis has ended up with triple digit inflation, or worse.
I suppose they just weren’t doing it right.
Correct. They weren’t doing it right.
Well if you know how to make it work, better get a patent on your method and make your fortune then.
The Rev Dodgson said:
mollwollfumble said:
The Rev Dodgson said:But strangely every single country that has financed government activities on that basis has ended up with triple digit inflation, or worse.
I suppose they just weren’t doing it right.
Correct. They weren’t doing it right.
Well if you know how to make it work, better get a patent on your method and make your fortune then.
Moll is too busy solving all the other world’s problems to tackle the economy right now.
“50% of the girls who are out of school now because schools are closed, are unlikely to go back to school, because meanwhile poverty has taken the toll. For girls, that means early marriage, exploitation, and worse.”
Filippo Grandis,
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
‘Countering Covid-19 Shocks in Fragile Contexts’
World Economic Forum
(from the video in the original post)
Fuck.
:-((
‘
Rule 303 said:
“50% of the girls who are out of school now because schools are closed, are unlikely to go back to school, because meanwhile poverty has taken the toll. For girls, that means early marriage, exploitation, and worse.”Filippo Grandis,
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
‘Countering Covid-19 Shocks in Fragile Contexts’
World Economic Forum
(from the video in the original post)Fuck.
:-((
‘
More to come. Sad it is.