Date: 11/11/2020 09:07:15
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1647513
Subject: The Great Reset

https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/

Your considered thoughts please.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/11/2020 09:46:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 1647545
Subject: re: The Great Reset

Idealism at best, before the coronavirus but maybe a new world is coming.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/11/2020 10:29:09
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1647553
Subject: re: The Great Reset

I don’t want a Free Trial I want a Fair Trial.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/11/2020 10:33:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 1647560
Subject: re: The Great Reset

Peak Warming Man said:


I don’t want a Free Trial I want a Fair Trial.

Like

Reply Quote

Date: 11/11/2020 15:03:18
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1647726
Subject: re: The Great Reset

ChrispenEvan said:


https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/

Your considered thoughts please.

> World Economic Forum

At least that sets the stage. Not political, environmental or health – economy.

> Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities …

Ahem, a bit up themselves?

> The Great Reset agenda would have three main components.

> At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action …

See my thread on should governments balance their budgets.
The Heinlein economic scheme was from when Heinlein was running for public office in the USA. He missed being elected by the slimmest of margins.
The economic scheme was not invented by him. “The economic program that Heinlein advocates is not original to him. It goes by the name of Social Credit”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit

Tax and public debt are, in the long term, irrelevant. Tax is only useful as a method of redistributing wealth between people.

> The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.

OK, so they’re promoting perpetual motion here.

> The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (biomedical revolution).

Hmm.

What they’re advocating may be very much worthwhile, I’m not equipped to know.
But if it involves more unnecessary legislation or wastage of human and non-human resources then I wouldn’t support it.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/11/2020 15:16:18
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1647731
Subject: re: The Great Reset

mollwollfumble said:


ChrispenEvan said:

https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/

Your considered thoughts please.

> World Economic Forum

At least that sets the stage. Not political, environmental or health – economy.

> Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities …

Ahem, a bit up themselves?

> The Great Reset agenda would have three main components.

> At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action …

See my thread on should governments balance their budgets.
The Heinlein economic scheme was from when Heinlein was running for public office in the USA. He missed being elected by the slimmest of margins.
The economic scheme was not invented by him. “The economic program that Heinlein advocates is not original to him. It goes by the name of Social Credit”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit

Tax and public debt are, in the long term, irrelevant. Tax is only useful as a method of redistributing wealth between people.

> The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.

OK, so they’re promoting perpetual motion here.

> The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (biomedical revolution).

Hmm.

What they’re advocating may be very much worthwhile, I’m not equipped to know.
But if it involves more unnecessary legislation or wastage of human and non-human resources then I wouldn’t support it.

But strangely every single country that has financed government activities on that basis has ended up with triple digit inflation, or worse.

I suppose they just weren’t doing it right.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2020 10:29:12
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1648085
Subject: re: The Great Reset

The Rev Dodgson said:


mollwollfumble said:

ChrispenEvan said:

https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/

Your considered thoughts please.

> World Economic Forum

At least that sets the stage. Not political, environmental or health – economy.

> Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities …

Ahem, a bit up themselves?

> The Great Reset agenda would have three main components.

> At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action …

See my thread on should governments balance their budgets.
The Heinlein economic scheme was from when Heinlein was running for public office in the USA. He missed being elected by the slimmest of margins.
The economic scheme was not invented by him. “The economic program that Heinlein advocates is not original to him. It goes by the name of Social Credit”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit

Tax and public debt are, in the long term, irrelevant. Tax is only useful as a method of redistributing wealth between people.

> The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.

OK, so they’re promoting perpetual motion here.

> The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (biomedical revolution).

Hmm.

What they’re advocating may be very much worthwhile, I’m not equipped to know.
But if it involves more unnecessary legislation or wastage of human and non-human resources then I wouldn’t support it.

But strangely every single country that has financed government activities on that basis has ended up with triple digit inflation, or worse.

I suppose they just weren’t doing it right.

Correct. They weren’t doing it right.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2020 10:32:46
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1648092
Subject: re: The Great Reset

mollwollfumble said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

mollwollfumble said:

> World Economic Forum

At least that sets the stage. Not political, environmental or health – economy.

> Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities …

Ahem, a bit up themselves?

> The Great Reset agenda would have three main components.

> At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action …

See my thread on should governments balance their budgets.
The Heinlein economic scheme was from when Heinlein was running for public office in the USA. He missed being elected by the slimmest of margins.
The economic scheme was not invented by him. “The economic program that Heinlein advocates is not original to him. It goes by the name of Social Credit”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit

Tax and public debt are, in the long term, irrelevant. Tax is only useful as a method of redistributing wealth between people.

> The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.

OK, so they’re promoting perpetual motion here.

> The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (biomedical revolution).

Hmm.

What they’re advocating may be very much worthwhile, I’m not equipped to know.
But if it involves more unnecessary legislation or wastage of human and non-human resources then I wouldn’t support it.

But strangely every single country that has financed government activities on that basis has ended up with triple digit inflation, or worse.

I suppose they just weren’t doing it right.

Correct. They weren’t doing it right.

Well if you know how to make it work, better get a patent on your method and make your fortune then.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2020 10:40:37
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1648102
Subject: re: The Great Reset

The Rev Dodgson said:


mollwollfumble said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

But strangely every single country that has financed government activities on that basis has ended up with triple digit inflation, or worse.

I suppose they just weren’t doing it right.

Correct. They weren’t doing it right.

Well if you know how to make it work, better get a patent on your method and make your fortune then.

Moll is too busy solving all the other world’s problems to tackle the economy right now.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2020 11:16:03
From: Rule 303
ID: 1648122
Subject: re: The Great Reset

“50% of the girls who are out of school now because schools are closed, are unlikely to go back to school, because meanwhile poverty has taken the toll. For girls, that means early marriage, exploitation, and worse.”

Filippo Grandis,
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
‘Countering Covid-19 Shocks in Fragile Contexts’
World Economic Forum
(from the video in the original post)

Fuck.

:-((

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2020 11:17:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 1648124
Subject: re: The Great Reset

Rule 303 said:


“50% of the girls who are out of school now because schools are closed, are unlikely to go back to school, because meanwhile poverty has taken the toll. For girls, that means early marriage, exploitation, and worse.”

Filippo Grandis,
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
‘Countering Covid-19 Shocks in Fragile Contexts’
World Economic Forum
(from the video in the original post)

Fuck.

:-((

More to come. Sad it is.

Reply Quote