The Big Bang never happened but fusion will

First in a four-part exclusive Asia Times interview with renowned physicist and Big Bang theory critic Eric Lerner

more…

Tau.Neutrino said:

The Big Bang never happened but fusion will

First in a four-part exclusive Asia Times interview with renowned physicist and Big Bang theory critic Eric Lerner

more…

Interesting.

Also interesting that the internet is full of stuff like flat earth “theories “, but you don’t hear much about this at all.

The Rev Dodgson said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

The Big Bang never happened but fusion will

First in a four-part exclusive Asia Times interview with renowned physicist and Big Bang theory critic Eric Lerner

more…

Interesting.

Also interesting that the internet is full of stuff like flat earth “theories “, but you don’t hear much about this at all.

I favour this model, as it makes more sense than something that just appears from nowhere, the universe appearing from nowhere is a bit like god creating the universe from nothing.

Tau.Neutrino said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

The Big Bang never happened but fusion will

First in a four-part exclusive Asia Times interview with renowned physicist and Big Bang theory critic Eric Lerner

more…

Interesting.

Also interesting that the internet is full of stuff like flat earth “theories “, but you don’t hear much about this at all.

I favour this model, as it makes more sense than something that just appears from nowhere, the universe appearing from nowhere is a bit like god creating the universe from nothing.

Well appearing from nowhere is not a part of the big bang theory, which starts after time zero.

Even those people who say the universe started from nothing do not appear to mean nothing when they say nothing.

The Rev Dodgson said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Interesting.

Also interesting that the internet is full of stuff like flat earth “theories “, but you don’t hear much about this at all.

I favour this model, as it makes more sense than something that just appears from nowhere, the universe appearing from nowhere is a bit like god creating the universe from nothing.

Well appearing from nowhere is not a part of the big bang theory, which starts after time zero.

Even those people who say the universe started from nothing do not appear to mean nothing when they say nothing.

Ok, what happens if nothing is replacing with something?

Have only read the first paragraph or two so far, but, let me guess, he says that fusion as a power source is……thirty years away?!

Tau.Neutrino said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

I favour this model, as it makes more sense than something that just appears from nowhere, the universe appearing from nowhere is a bit like god creating the universe from nothing.

Well appearing from nowhere is not a part of the big bang theory, which starts after time zero.

Even those people who say the universe started from nothing do not appear to mean nothing when they say nothing.

Ok, what happens if nothing is replacing with something?

It removes the question of how something can be generated out of nothing.

captain_spalding said:

Have only read the first paragraph or two so far, but, let me guess, he says that fusion as a power source is……thirty years away?!

The article doesn’t actually address that question (although I’m sure it is just around the corner).

The Rev Dodgson said:

captain_spalding said:

Have only read the first paragraph or two so far, but, let me guess, he says that fusion as a power source is……thirty years away?!

The article doesn’t actually address that question (although I’m sure it is just around the corner).

Fusion power in thirty years time is relative to the observer in time, so it will always be in thirty years time no matter where the observer is in time.

The Rev Dodgson said:

…(although I’m sure it is just around the corner).

Always has been.

If the Big Bang did happen, it wouldn’t have been called “the Big Bang” in those days. Probably some native name.

Bubblecar said:

If the Big Bang did happen, it wouldn’t have been called “the Big Bang” in those days. Probably some native name.

LOL

Bubblecar said:

If the Big Bang did happen, it wouldn’t have been called “the Big Bang” in those days. Probably some native name.

Biggus Bangus?

I watched Eric Lerner’s first video and most of the second before almost falling asleep. However I am still non the wiser as I felt I was being blinded by science on a subject I knew little about, which I liken to the Global Warming deniers selling their misinformation to the ill-informed as it all seems plausible to those without a clue. Not saying Eric Lerner is a crank or trying to put one over, but I don’t know why he can’t give a simple layman’s explanation of his alternative theory and then provide all the evidence to back it up. At least then you would have some appreciation of if he were talking sense or not. Gave him a fail in communication.