Date: 11/12/2020 09:24:03
From: Obviousman
ID: 1662885
Subject: Energy drinks
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
Date: 11/12/2020 09:25:55
From: Obviousman
ID: 1662886
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Obviousman said:
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
For instance, the max cans is based on you also drinking coffee?
Date: 11/12/2020 09:36:18
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1662888
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Obviousman said:
Obviousman said:
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
For instance, the max cans is based on you also drinking coffee?
Pure guess:
The caffeine in energy drinks has a higher absorption rate than the caffeine in coffee.
Date: 11/12/2020 09:40:48
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1662891
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Obviousman said:
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
Maybe other people are missing something ?
Date: 11/12/2020 09:42:55
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1662892
Subject: re: Energy drinks
I like energy drinks.
If I drink them late at night I wont get to sleep.
Date: 11/12/2020 10:01:05
From: Woodie
ID: 1662897
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Obviousman said:
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
Have you also checked the sugar content against RDI?
Date: 11/12/2020 10:03:27
From: Obviousman
ID: 1662898
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Woodie said:
Obviousman said:
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
Have you also checked the sugar content against RDI?
Oh, I know they are really high in sugar. That’s probably why I like them so!
Date: 11/12/2020 11:08:17
From: Cymek
ID: 1662950
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Obviousman said:
Woodie said:
Obviousman said:
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
Have you also checked the sugar content against RDI?
Oh, I know they are really high in sugar. That’s probably why I like them so!
I drink them a lot, probably too much (be honest Cymek yes far too many), switched to the no sugar variety they don’t have the same kick though
They do have other wake up ingredients in them that coffee wouldn’t perhaps that is one reason or they air on the side of caution
Date: 11/12/2020 11:10:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 1662953
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Cymek said:
Obviousman said:
Woodie said:
Have you also checked the sugar content against RDI?
Oh, I know they are really high in sugar. That’s probably why I like them so!
I drink them a lot, probably too much (be honest Cymek yes far too many), switched to the no sugar variety they don’t have the same kick though
They do have other wake up ingredients in them that coffee wouldn’t perhaps that is one reason or they air on the side of caution
air = err?
well to give it air room, yes.
Chemical cocktails hold a whole raft of possibilities. Many as yet not even imagined let alone investigated.
Date: 11/12/2020 11:11:46
From: Cymek
ID: 1662956
Subject: re: Energy drinks
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
Obviousman said:
Oh, I know they are really high in sugar. That’s probably why I like them so!
I drink them a lot, probably too much (be honest Cymek yes far too many), switched to the no sugar variety they don’t have the same kick though
They do have other wake up ingredients in them that coffee wouldn’t perhaps that is one reason or they air on the side of caution
air = err?
well to give it air room, yes.
Chemical cocktails hold a whole raft of possibilities. Many as yet not even imagined let alone investigated.
Yes err
Date: 11/12/2020 22:17:11
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1663428
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Obviousman said:
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
Fist hit on google.

Date: 11/12/2020 22:30:36
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1663439
Subject: re: Energy drinks
mollwollfumble said:
Obviousman said:
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
Fist hit on google.

From website https://www.caffeineinformer.com/energy-drinks-caffeine
This website lists 20 energy drinks, each with more than 250 mg of caffeine. ie. there are a lot of energy drinks where the recommended maximum caffeine dose is only 1 can per day, rather than two.
The database also includes 3 ‘V’ energy drink types, with caffeine contents ranging from 109 to 147 mg. Three cans at 147 mg per can would be over the 400 mg limit.
> I would think you could have four cans 86 mg of caffeine and still be within limits.
You would be. Go ahead.
Date: 12/12/2020 09:43:34
From: Ogmog
ID: 1663642
Subject: re: Energy drinks
mollwollfumble said:
mollwollfumble said:
Obviousman said:
I like energy drinks (particularly the blue V cans) but do not drink coffee. I see that the maximum daily recommended intake of energy drinks is two x 330 ml cans per day.
According to what I could find, the recommended maximum amount of caffeine per day is 400 mg.
According to the manufacturers website, a 330 ml can of V has 86 mg of caffeine, so two cans would be 172 mg of caffeine – less than half the recommend maximum. I would think you could have four cans and still be within limits.
Why the disparity, 400 versus 172? Is there something I am missing here?
Fist hit on google.

From website https://www.caffeineinformer.com/energy-drinks-caffeine
This website lists 20 energy drinks, each with more than 250 mg of caffeine. ie. there are a lot of energy drinks where the recommended maximum caffeine dose is only 1 can per day, rather than two.
The database also includes 3 ‘V’ energy drink types, with caffeine contents ranging from 109 to 147 mg. Three cans at 147 mg per can would be over the 400 mg limit.
> I would think you could have four cans 86 mg of caffeine and still be within limits.
You would be. Go ahead.
Never give RED BULL to a Pileated Woodpecker
Date: 12/12/2020 11:07:54
From: Ogmog
ID: 1663717
Subject: re: Energy drinks
all kidding aside
I was curious as to the purpose
(other than getting wired) for caffeine &
as I suspected, it’s a natural chemical produced by
some plants to deter or kill insects that would normally eat it.
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/10/07/us/caffeine-is-natural-insecticide-scientist-says.html
so it made me wonder if the limit for imbibing Energy Drinks
might not be the actual toxicity of the caffeine especially over time.
Date: 12/12/2020 14:29:46
From: Ogmog
ID: 1663894
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Ogmog said:
all kidding aside
I was curious as to the purpose
(other than getting wired) for caffeine &
as I suspected, it’s a natural chemical produced by
some plants to deter or kill insects that would normally eat it.
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/10/07/us/caffeine-is-natural-insecticide-scientist-says.html
so it made me wonder if the limit for imbibing Energy Drinks
might not be the actual toxicity of the caffeine especially over time.
which then brings up the question of our pursuit of and even addiction to
that which proves to be dangerous or toxic even after recognizing its danger,
whether it’s caffeine, nicotine, cocaine or a debilitating codependent relationship.
Date: 12/12/2020 14:41:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1663906
Subject: re: Energy drinks
probably some blanket rule is in general simpler to apply for a typical population than a computationally (slightly-)intensive rule that we might prefer
Date: 13/12/2020 08:18:33
From: Ogmog
ID: 1664171
Subject: re: Energy drinks
SCIENCE said:
probably some blanket rule is in general simpler to apply for a typical population than a computationally (slightly-)intensive rule that we might prefer
So…..perhaps from a survival standpoint…
we should revise the old Hippy mantra
to “If it feels good DON’T Do It”?

Date: 16/12/2020 12:28:21
From: Obviousman
ID: 1665862
Subject: re: Energy drinks
There is a difference between what that database says, and what the cans say. According to the can, a 275 ml can has 86 mg of caffeine.
I’m wondering if a two can limit is not due to caffeine but something else. Guarana?
Date: 16/12/2020 12:33:20
From: Ian
ID: 1665864
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Obviousman said:
There is a difference between what that database says, and what the cans say. According to the can, a 275 ml can has 86 mg of caffeine.
I’m wondering if a two can limit is not due to caffeine but something else. Guarana?
Either that or the Garcinia Cambogia.
Date: 16/12/2020 12:37:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1665867
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Obviousman said:
There is a difference between what that database says, and what the cans say. According to the can, a 275 ml can has 86 mg of caffeine.
I’m wondering if a two can limit is not due to caffeine but something else. Guarana?
uh what is Guarana
Date: 16/12/2020 12:38:13
From: Divine Angel
ID: 1665869
Subject: re: Energy drinks
SCIENCE said:
Obviousman said:
There is a difference between what that database says, and what the cans say. According to the can, a 275 ml can has 86 mg of caffeine.
I’m wondering if a two can limit is not due to caffeine but something else. Guarana?
uh what is Guarana
https://www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingredientmono-935/guarana
Date: 16/12/2020 12:38:42
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1665870
Subject: re: Energy drinks
SCIENCE said:
Obviousman said:
There is a difference between what that database says, and what the cans say. According to the can, a 275 ml can has 86 mg of caffeine.
I’m wondering if a two can limit is not due to caffeine but something else. Guarana?
uh what is Guarana
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guarana
Date: 16/12/2020 12:41:48
From: Divine Angel
ID: 1665872
Subject: re: Energy drinks
You also need to increase the caffeine content in order to get the same buzz.
Date: 16/12/2020 12:42:00
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1665873
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Obviousman said:
There is a difference between what that database says, and what the cans say. According to the can, a 275 ml can has 86 mg of caffeine.
I’m wondering if a two can limit is not due to caffeine but something else. Guarana?
uh what is Guarana
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guarana
Caffeine, basically.
So, when the ingredients list says ‘caffeine and guarana’ it means ‘caffeine and caffeine’.
Date: 16/12/2020 12:42:30
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1665874
Subject: re: Energy drinks
https://www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingredientmono-935/guarana
Date: 16/12/2020 12:43:00
From: Obviousman
ID: 1665875
Subject: re: Energy drinks
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
uh what is Guarana
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guarana
Caffeine, basically.
So, when the ingredients list says ‘caffeine and guarana’ it means ‘caffeine and caffeine’.
OK – NOW the limits make sense.
Date: 16/12/2020 12:50:13
From: buffy
ID: 1665877
Subject: re: Energy drinks
SCIENCE said:
Obviousman said:
There is a difference between what that database says, and what the cans say. According to the can, a 275 ml can has 86 mg of caffeine.
I’m wondering if a two can limit is not due to caffeine but something else. Guarana?
uh what is Guarana
Caffeine when it’s been drinking red cordial.
Date: 16/12/2020 13:48:56
From: fsm
ID: 1665886
Subject: re: Energy drinks
Energy Drink Consumption: Beneficial and Adverse Health Effects
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682602/
“Consumption of energy drinks has been increasing dramatically in the last two decades, particularly amongst adolescents and young adults. Energy drinks are aggressively marketed with the claim that these products give an energy boost to improve physical and cognitive performance. However, studies supporting these claims are limited. In fact, several adverse health effects have been related to energy drink; this has raised the question of whether these beverages are safe. This review was carried out to identify and discuss the published articles that examined the beneficial and adverse health effects related to energy drink. It is concluded that although energy drink may have beneficial effects on physical performance, these products also have possible detrimental health consequences. Marketing of energy drinks should be limited or forbidden until independent research confirms their safety, particularly among adolescents.”
Date: 16/12/2020 14:06:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 1665889
Subject: re: Energy drinks
fsm said:
Energy Drink Consumption: Beneficial and Adverse Health Effects
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682602/
“Consumption of energy drinks has been increasing dramatically in the last two decades, particularly amongst adolescents and young adults. Energy drinks are aggressively marketed with the claim that these products give an energy boost to improve physical and cognitive performance. However, studies supporting these claims are limited. In fact, several adverse health effects have been related to energy drink; this has raised the question of whether these beverages are safe. This review was carried out to identify and discuss the published articles that examined the beneficial and adverse health effects related to energy drink. It is concluded that although energy drink may have beneficial effects on physical performance, these products also have possible detrimental health consequences. Marketing of energy drinks should be limited or forbidden until independent research confirms their safety, particularly among adolescents.”
Red Bull is a name synomous with racing cars and planes and boats?