Date: 1/01/2021 23:31:03
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1673347
Subject: There's Mounting Evidence That Life on Earth Started With More Than Just RNA

How life originated on Earth continues to fascinate scientists, but it’s not easy peering back billions of years into the past. Now, evidence is growing for a relatively new hypothesis of how life began: with a very precise mix of RNA and DNA.

RNA and DNA both determine the genetic make-up of all biological life, with DNA acting as a genetic blueprint and RNA as a blueprint reader or decoder. For a long time, it was thought that RNA developed on Earth first, with DNA evolving afterwards – but mounting evidence suggests they may have emerged at the same time and both been involved in kickstarting life on the planet.

The latest study to back up this idea explains how the simple compound diamidophosphate (DAP) – which may have predated life on Earth – can knit together DNA building blocks called deoxynucleosides into basic DNA strands.

“This finding is an important step toward the development of a detailed chemical model of how the first life forms originated on Earth,” says chemist Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy form Scripps Research in California.

The findings add credence to the idea that both DNA and RNA developed together from the same sort of chemical reactions at the beginning of life on our planet, and that the first self-replicating molecules could have been mixes of both these nucleic acids – not just RNA, as suggested in the more established ‘RNA world’ hypothesis.

One of the big issues with the idea that RNA alone gave rise to life on Earth is how RNA was able to go through the necessary self-replication process – RNA usually requires enzymes to split, which evolved after RNA.

From what we know so far, it seems that RNA had some kind of helping hand in engineering life – and the latest experiments show that DNA could well have been it, creating “chimeric” molecular strands that can separate more easily than RNA alone.

The series of lab tests run by the researchers simulated what might have happened before the beginnings of life on Earth, and show how DAP could have feasibly formed basic DNA in much the same way as RNA can come together from chemical building blocks.

“We found, to our surprise, that using DAP to react with deoxynucleosides works better when the deoxynucleosides are not all the same but are instead mixes of different DNA letters such as A and T, or G and C, like real DNA,” says chemical biologist Eddy Jiménez, from Scripps Research.

We may never know for sure whether DNA helped RNA to form the first lifeforms on our planet, considering this happened billions of years ago, but our understanding of these processes continues to develop.

The research isn’t just useful in terms of how it relates to the origins of life, either – insight into the RNA-DNA relationship can have a whole host of applications in modern chemistry and biology.

“Now that we understand better how a primordial chemistry could have made the first RNAs and DNAs, we can start using it on mixes of ribonucleoside and deoxynucleoside building blocks to see what chimeric molecules are formed – and whether they can self-replicate and evolve,” says Krishnamurthy.

The research has been published in Angewandte Chemie.

https://www.sciencealert.com/there-s-more-evidence-for-a-new-idea-about-how-life-on-earth-got-started

Reply Quote

Date: 2/01/2021 10:18:10
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1673481
Subject: re: There's Mounting Evidence That Life on Earth Started With More Than Just RNA

> the simple compound diamidophosphate (DAP) – which may have predated life on Earth – can knit together DNA building blocks called deoxynucleosides into basic DNA strands.

> We found, to our surprise, that using DAP to react with deoxynucleosides works better when the deoxynucleosides are not all the same but are instead mixes of different DNA letters such as A and T, or G and C, like real DNA.

Yippee.

I’ve been waiting for this news since the late 1970s. This fills a huge gap in the story of the origin of life.

Also, this is by far the smallest enzyme that I’ve ever heard of, and all its components are easily available. Even metal nanoparticles are bigger than this.

Reply Quote

Date: 2/01/2021 11:03:28
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1673528
Subject: re: There's Mounting Evidence That Life on Earth Started With More Than Just RNA

mollwollfumble said:


> the simple compound diamidophosphate (DAP) – which may have predated life on Earth – can knit together DNA building blocks called deoxynucleosides into basic DNA strands.

> We found, to our surprise, that using DAP to react with deoxynucleosides works better when the deoxynucleosides are not all the same but are instead mixes of different DNA letters such as A and T, or G and C, like real DNA.

Yippee.

I’ve been waiting for this news since the late 1970s. This fills a huge gap in the story of the origin of life.

Also, this is by far the smallest enzyme that I’ve ever heard of, and all its components are easily available. Even metal nanoparticles are bigger than this.

And to think, this chemical is named after me.
I’m so glad I’ve lived long enough to see this.

Reply Quote

Date: 2/01/2021 18:27:50
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1673723
Subject: re: There's Mounting Evidence That Life on Earth Started With More Than Just RNA

“Prebiotic Phosphorylation and Concomitant Oligomerization of Deoxynucleosides to form DNA”, Jiménez

https://sci-hub.st/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anie.202015910

“Recent demonstrations of RNA-DNA chimeras enabling RNA and DNA replication,coupled with prebiotic co-synthesis of deoxyribo- and ribo-nucleotides,have resurrected the hypothesis of co-emergence of RNA and DNA.”

First I’ve heard of RNA-DNA chimeras.

“Deoxyribose was detected as part of suite of sugars formed when water-methanol ice analogs were photo-irradiated.”

Also news to me.

“base-pairing properties of nucleic acids with alternative sugar backbones and nucleobases, which led us to view RNA as an emergent entity, an end result of an incremental chemical evolution of a chimeric system.”

Good. I hadn’t come to that conclusion, but it makes mores sense than what I was thinking.

So DAP and Aim together give AMP (adenosine monophosphate) from adenosine. An essential step in producing RNA and DNA.

“Considering the reactivity of deoxynucleosides,we were mindful of the fact that the 3’-hydroxyl group of deoxynucleosides is less nucleophilic when compared to thecorresponding ribonucleosides. Therefore, we expected higher regioselectivity for the 5’-hydroxyl and form the 5’-phosphorylated derivatives –in contrast to what we observed with the ribonucleosides with DAP,”

To summarise, RNA before DNA was expected, but not observed then DAP was used. Hmm, so what polymerises RNA?

They managed to get DNA polymerisation by this method up to 6 bases long.

Reply Quote