sarahs mum said:

:-)

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

:-)

what you need Hyoscyamus niger, and that’s not racist, it’s sexist

dv said:

^

dv said:

Total bullshit.

What Satan really whispers is “I want you”. I know, I cured myself of demonic possession.

Oh, and that’s what God whispers, too.

dv said:

Has young Matt had a bit much sun?

mollwollfumble said:

dv said:

Total bullshit.

What Satan really whispers is “I want you”. I know, I cured myself of demonic possession.

I see

mollwollfumble said:

dv said:

Total bullshit.

What Satan really whispers is “I want you”. I know, I cured myself of demonic possession.

Oh, and that’s what God whispers, too.

Why believe in either?

sarahs mum said:

mollwollfumble said:

dv said:

Total bullshit.

What Satan really whispers is “I want you”. I know, I cured myself of demonic possession.

Oh, and that’s what God whispers, too.

Why believe in either?

You don’t have to believe in Satan to have demonic possession.

dv said:

Seems a strange thing to say that Satan says.

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Seems a strange thing to say that Satan says.

“Put your hands in the air”, Simple Simon says

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGHfg27CZ7I

Melbourne. Anyone want to guess the year?

Rule 303 said:

Melbourne. Anyone want to guess the year?

76

Rule 303 said:

Melbourne. Anyone want to guess the year?

Early 1990s… I’ll pick 93.

Rule 303 said:

Melbourne. Anyone want to guess the year?

February 1985.

btm said:

Rule 303 said:

Melbourne. Anyone want to guess the year?

February 1985.

I said ‘guess’, not Google image search.

;-)

Rule 303 said:

btm said:

Rule 303 said:

Melbourne. Anyone want to guess the year?

February 1985.

I said ‘guess’, not Google image search.

;-)

Nope, didn’t do that. It wasn’t a guess, though.

Rule 303 said:

btm said:

Rule 303 said:

Melbourne. Anyone want to guess the year?

February 1985.

I said ‘guess’, not Google image search.

;-)

That prick on the far left, he threw me off completely.

btm said:

Rule 303 said:

btm said:

February 1985.

I said ‘guess’, not Google image search.

;-)

Nope, didn’t do that. It wasn’t a guess, though.

Doing some shit with RRR or similar?

btm said:

Rule 303 said:

btm said:

February 1985.

I said ‘guess’, not Google image search.

;-)

Nope, didn’t do that. It wasn’t a guess, though.

Do you remember it? I had no memory of it.

Rule 303 said:

btm said:

Rule 303 said:

I said ‘guess’, not Google image search.

;-)

Nope, didn’t do that. It wasn’t a guess, though.

Do you remember it? I had no memory of it.

I was still at school at the time, and had to go around it. That’s about the best I can do, though; I don’t remember anything else about it.

btm said:

Rule 303 said:

btm said:

Nope, didn’t do that. It wasn’t a guess, though.

Do you remember it? I had no memory of it.

I was still at school at the time, and had to go around it. That’s about the best I can do, though; I don’t remember anything else about it.

Same. I would have been in the second year of an out-of-zone scholarship to a music high school in the leafy outer north east, and the half-dozen occasions I recall coming into the city would all have been at night time.

Rule 303 said:

btm said:

Rule 303 said:

Do you remember it? I had no memory of it.

I was still at school at the time, and had to go around it. That’s about the best I can do, though; I don’t remember anything else about it.

Same. I would have been in the second year of an out-of-zone scholarship to a music high school in the leafy outer north east, and the half-dozen occasions I recall coming into the city would all have been at night time.

I was living in QLD.

sibeen said:

Rule 303 said:

btm said:

I was still at school at the time, and had to go around it. That’s about the best I can do, though; I don’t remember anything else about it.

Same. I would have been in the second year of an out-of-zone scholarship to a music high school in the leafy outer north east, and the half-dozen occasions I recall coming into the city would all have been at night time.

I was living in QLD.

Canungra?

btm said:

sibeen said:

Rule 303 said:

Same. I would have been in the second year of an out-of-zone scholarship to a music high school in the leafy outer north east, and the half-dozen occasions I recall coming into the city would all have been at night time.

I was living in QLD.

Canungra?

Just north of Toowoomba at a place called Cabarlah.

mollwollfumble said:

dv said:

Total bullshit.

What Satan really whispers is “I want you”. I know, I cured myself of demonic possession.

Oh, and that’s what God whispers, too.

Its good to be wanted

sibeen said:

btm said:

sibeen said:

I was living in QLD.

Canungra?

Just north of Toowoomba at a place called Cabarlah.

If you don’t mind my asking, when did you move to Melbourne?

btm said:

sibeen said:

btm said:

Canungra?

Just north of Toowoomba at a place called Cabarlah.

If you don’t mind my asking, when did you move to Melbourne?

I’m Melbourne born and bred. The Cabarlah gig was an Army thing. I was there for 3.5 years.

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Seems a strange thing to say that Satan says.

Makes him sound pretty cool

dv said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Seems a strange thing to say that Satan says.

Makes him sound pretty cool

Yes it’s a bit silly.

Bubblecar said:

dv said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Seems a strange thing to say that Satan says.

Makes him sound pretty cool

Yes it’s a bit silly.

What’s it meant to mean ¿

SCIENCE said:

Bubblecar said:

dv said:

Makes him sound pretty cool

Yes it’s a bit silly.

What’s it meant to mean ¿

That dicks are dicks.

sarahs mum said:

Sadly LOL.

I think it is sad that govt says it has a bushfire relief fund and sits on it. And that charities got a huge influx in funds and sits on them.

Rule 303 said:

LOL

dv said:

IdK why I’d post that here, none of y’all know who Peter Cushing, Steven Moffat, Chris Chibnall are…

dv said:

dv said:

IdK why I’d post that here, none of y’all know who Peter Cushing, Steven Moffat, Chris Chibnall are…

Au contraire.

I know the name Peter Cushing very well.

The other two kids, OK, never ‘eard of them.

dv said:

dv said:

IdK why I’d post that here, none of y’all know who Peter Cushing, Steven Moffat, Chris Chibnall are…

You say that like it is some kind of mental deficiency on our part.

dv said:

dv said:

IdK why I’d post that here, none of y’all know who Peter Cushing, Steven Moffat, Chris Chibnall are…

u reckon?

party_pants said:

dv said:

dv said:

IdK why I’d post that here, none of y’all know who Peter Cushing, Steven Moffat, Chris Chibnall are…

You say that like it is some kind of mental deficiency on our part.

Well now I didn’t say that.

dv said:

Ah yes…dv…didn’t like last night’s episode. Muddled, messy and for goodness sake! 4 minutes to move the TARDIS?! What rubbish!

dv said:

dv said:

IdK why I’d post that here, none of y’all know who Peter Cushing, Steven Moffat, Chris Chibnall are…

‘Release him,Vader.’

buffy said:

dv said:

Ah yes…dv…didn’t like last night’s episode. Muddled, messy and for goodness sake! 4 minutes to move the TARDIS?! What rubbish!

First time I’ve ever switched a Dr Who off.

dv said:

dv said:

IdK why I’d post that here, none of y’all know who Peter Cushing, Steven Moffat, Chris Chibnall are…

Have heard the Cushing name in association with Dr Who, but not seen the films. I know who the other two are.

buffy said:

dv said:

Ah yes…dv…didn’t like last night’s episode. Muddled, messy and for goodness sake! 4 minutes to move the TARDIS?! What rubbish!

The explanation was that it had been mothballed for decades while she was in prison.

Overall I liked it, though it wasn’t perfect. Jack was in good form.

I wasn’t sad to see the back of Ryan. I don’t think Tosin Cole was ever really into it. You’ve got to throw yourself into the role. Graham, I’ll miss.

dv said:

buffy said:

dv said:

Ah yes…dv…didn’t like last night’s episode. Muddled, messy and for goodness sake! 4 minutes to move the TARDIS?! What rubbish!

The explanation was that it had been mothballed for decades while she was in prison.

Overall I liked it, though it wasn’t perfect. Jack was in good form.

I wasn’t sad to see the back of Ryan. I don’t think Tosin Cole was ever really into it. You’ve got to throw yourself into the role. Graham, I’ll miss.

I don’t know whether I’ll stay with the next series or not. I do very much do not like rewriting the Doctor’s history.

Did you see my comment that your quote about “Have you had work done? You should talk” was a lift direct from Utopia? I only knew it because we watched it the other night.

dv said:

dv said:

IdK why I’d post that here, none of y’all know who Peter Cushing, Steven Moffat, Chris Chibnall are…

Correct.

buffy said:

dv said:

buffy said:

Ah yes…dv…didn’t like last night’s episode. Muddled, messy and for goodness sake! 4 minutes to move the TARDIS?! What rubbish!

The explanation was that it had been mothballed for decades while she was in prison.

Overall I liked it, though it wasn’t perfect. Jack was in good form.

I wasn’t sad to see the back of Ryan. I don’t think Tosin Cole was ever really into it. You’ve got to throw yourself into the role. Graham, I’ll miss.

I don’t know whether I’ll stay with the next series or not. I do very much do not like rewriting the Doctor’s history.

Did you see my comment that your quote about “Have you had work done? You should talk” was a lift direct from Utopia? I only knew it because we watched it the other night.

dv said:

buffy said:

dv said:

The explanation was that it had been mothballed for decades while she was in prison.

Overall I liked it, though it wasn’t perfect. Jack was in good form.

I wasn’t sad to see the back of Ryan. I don’t think Tosin Cole was ever really into it. You’ve got to throw yourself into the role. Graham, I’ll miss.

I don’t know whether I’ll stay with the next series or not. I do very much do not like rewriting the Doctor’s history.

Did you see my comment that your quote about “Have you had work done? You should talk” was a lift direct from Utopia? I only knew it because we watched it the other night.

Should I understand this?

buffy said:

dv said:

buffy said:

I don’t know whether I’ll stay with the next series or not. I do very much do not like rewriting the Doctor’s history.

Did you see my comment that your quote about “Have you had work done? You should talk” was a lift direct from Utopia? I only knew it because we watched it the other night.

Should I understand this?

It’s a reference to a new show called The Simpsons, m’lord.

dv said:

buffy said:

dv said:

Should I understand this?

It’s a reference to a new show called The Simpsons, m’lord.

Yes, but how is it relevent, except in the use of the word Dalek, to the rest of the discussion?

Perhaps it isn’t and is just something random.

buffy said:

dv said:

buffy said:

Should I understand this?

It’s a reference to a new show called The Simpsons, m’lord.

Yes, but how is it relevent, except in the use of the word Dalek, to the rest of the discussion?

Perhaps it isn’t and is just something random.

Well it’s usually best just to leave jokes as they are without explaining them, even if they don’t quite land. Explaining jokes tends to suck joy from the universe.

dv said:

buffy said:

dv said:

It’s a reference to a new show called The Simpsons, m’lord.

Yes, but how is it relevent, except in the use of the word Dalek, to the rest of the discussion?

Perhaps it isn’t and is just something random.

Well it’s usually best just to leave jokes as they are without explaining them, even if they don’t quite land. Explaining jokes tends to suck joy from the universe.

Fair enough. I’m happy in my naivety. I have absolutely no idea what the joke is.

dv said:

When my mother was in her 60s and was saying that the world is strange and crazy, it wasn’t as strange and crazy as it is now, right?

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

When my mother was in her 60s and was saying that the world is strange and crazy, it wasn’t as strange and crazy as it is now, right?

not quite so looney tunes, no.

dv said:

OMG! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

The reporter didn’t have to go far from the desk to make that one up…

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

When my mother was in her 60s and was saying that the world is strange and crazy, it wasn’t as strange and crazy as it is now, right?

If you look at the last few thousand years, I’d say the current Looniness Index was well towards the bottom end of the scale.

The Rev Dodgson said:

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

When my mother was in her 60s and was saying that the world is strange and crazy, it wasn’t as strange and crazy as it is now, right?

If you look at the last few thousand years, I’d say the current Looniness Index was well towards the bottom end of the scale.

but but … her mother was only in her sixties.

roughbarked said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

sarahs mum said:

When my mother was in her 60s and was saying that the world is strange and crazy, it wasn’t as strange and crazy as it is now, right?

If you look at the last few thousand years, I’d say the current Looniness Index was well towards the bottom end of the scale.

but but … her mother was only in her sixties.

Well even if you restrict the range to the last 30 years, I don’t think the LI has changed much over that time.

I cannot imagine too many companies releasing an ad like that now days. That one is from the 70s.

sibeen said:

I cannot imagine too many companies releasing an ad like that now days. That one is from the 70s.

National Semiconductor

National Semiconductor was an American semiconductor manufacturer…

furious said:

sibeen said:

I cannot imagine too many companies releasing an ad like that now days. That one is from the 70s.

National Semiconductor

National Semiconductor was an American semiconductor manufacturer…

Our message to the competition is simple: please take us over, we’re going bankrupt.

furious said:

sibeen said:

I cannot imagine too many companies releasing an ad like that now days. That one is from the 70s.

National Semiconductor

National Semiconductor was an American semiconductor manufacturer…

I used to have a shed load of NS data books. They were indispensable years ago. I probably threw them out about 10 years ago when it was obvious that everything in them could just be found in a quick search and download of a PDF.

Bubblecar said:

furious said:

sibeen said:

I cannot imagine too many companies releasing an ad like that now days. That one is from the 70s.

National Semiconductor

National Semiconductor was an American semiconductor manufacturer…

Our message to the competition is simple: please take us over, we’re going bankrupt.

Yeah, scanning through that wiki article I noted that they were taken over by one of the companies that they bad mouthed…

Bubblecar said:

furious said:

sibeen said:

I cannot imagine too many companies releasing an ad like that now days. That one is from the 70s.

National Semiconductor

National Semiconductor was an American semiconductor manufacturer…

Our message to the competition is simple: please take us over, we’re going bankrupt.

I’m pretty sure they remained a profitable company up until the time they were bought out by Texan Instruments.

furious said:

Bubblecar said:

furious said:

National Semiconductor

National Semiconductor was an American semiconductor manufacturer…

Our message to the competition is simple: please take us over, we’re going bankrupt.

Yeah, scanning through that wiki article I noted that they were taken over by one of the companies that they bad mouthed…

Forty years after the as and at quite a nice price :)

sibeen said:

Bubblecar said:

furious said:

National Semiconductor

National Semiconductor was an American semiconductor manufacturer…

Our message to the competition is simple: please take us over, we’re going bankrupt.

I’m pretty sure they remained a profitable company up until the time they were bought out by Texan Instruments.

Irregardless, when putting out feelers for a sell-out, they were told: “First, we expect a little apology for that middle finger.”

furious said:

Bubblecar said:

furious said:

National Semiconductor

National Semiconductor was an American semiconductor manufacturer…

Our message to the competition is simple: please take us over, we’re going bankrupt.

Yeah, scanning through that wiki article I noted that they were taken over by one of the companies that they bad mouthed…

Well I read the ad, and that doesn’t happen often.

The Rev Dodgson said:

furious said:

Bubblecar said:

Our message to the competition is simple: please take us over, we’re going bankrupt.

Yeah, scanning through that wiki article I noted that they were taken over by one of the companies that they bad mouthed…

Well I read the ad, and that doesn’t happen often.

This bloke was the ads inspiration. We both had heart attacks at 53. He didn’t survive his. An EE genius.

sibeen said:

furious said:

sibeen said:

I cannot imagine too many companies releasing an ad like that now days. That one is from the 70s.

National Semiconductor

National Semiconductor was an American semiconductor manufacturer…

I used to have a shed load of NS data books. They were indispensable years ago. I probably threw them out about 10 years ago when it was obvious that everything in them could just be found in a quick search and download of a PDF.

I had some of them, too, but preferred other companies’ books; NS included example circuits but not details on how to use the chips. Motorola and Intersil were best for component details.

Bubblecar said:

sibeen said:

Bubblecar said:

Our message to the competition is simple: please take us over, we’re going bankrupt.

I’m pretty sure they remained a profitable company up until the time they were bought out by Texan Instruments.

Irregardless, when putting out feelers for a sell-out, they were told: “First, we expect a little apology for that middle finger.”

Irregardless?

Witty Rejoinder said:

Bubblecar said:

sibeen said:

I’m pretty sure they remained a profitable company up until the time they were bought out by Texan Instruments.

Irregardless, when putting out feelers for a sell-out, they were told: “First, we expect a little apology for that middle finger.”

Irregardless?

Like First Dog & sibeen, I use that term for comic effect.

Bubblecar said:

Like First Dog & sibeen, I use that term for comic effect.

Somebody has to play for a chuckle or two around here, now that Boris has abandoned ship.

sarahs mum said:

:)

Witty Rejoinder said:

Bubblecar said:

sibeen said:

I’m pretty sure they remained a profitable company up until the time they were bought out by Texan Instruments.

Irregardless, when putting out feelers for a sell-out, they were told: “First, we expect a little apology for that middle finger.”

Irregardless?

Yes. As in:

Irregardless of the irritating irregular irrigation…

captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Bubblecar said:

Irregardless, when putting out feelers for a sell-out, they were told: “First, we expect a little apology for that middle finger.”

Irregardless?

Yes. As in:

Irregardless of the irritating irregular irrigation…

it is a normal “regardless” except you can only see it with a thermal vision camera…

A part time maestro would be a semi conductor

Glamping with Gladys

Rule 303 said:

what

dv said:

Dear oh dear.

I think this is making a good point. There are already robots who can identify traffic lights in real life so how are those tests useful…

dv said:

I think this is making a good point. There are already robots who can identify traffic lights in real life so how are those tests useful…

I thought it was making a good point too:

Even robots specifically designed to identify traffic lights, are not very good at identifying traffic lights.

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

I think this is making a good point. There are already robots who can identify traffic lights in real life so how are those tests useful…

I thought it was making a good point too:

Even robots specifically designed to identify traffic lights, are not very good at identifying traffic lights.

That’s nothing.

We have lots of human drivers around here who can’t identify traffic lights. Or Give Way signs. Or speed signs.

captain_spalding said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

I think this is making a good point. There are already robots who can identify traffic lights in real life so how are those tests useful…

I thought it was making a good point too:

Even robots specifically designed to identify traffic lights, are not very good at identifying traffic lights.

That’s nothing.

We have lots of human drivers around here who can’t identify traffic lights. Or Give Way signs. Or speed signs.

Or think that yellow means go faster.

Tamb said:

captain_spalding said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

I thought it was making a good point too:

Even robots specifically designed to identify traffic lights, are not very good at identifying traffic lights.

That’s nothing.

We have lots of human drivers around here who can’t identify traffic lights. Or Give Way signs. Or speed signs.

Or think that yellow means go faster.

Hang on – that’s accepted standard practice isn’t it?

The Rev Dodgson said:

Tamb said:

captain_spalding said:

That’s nothing.

We have lots of human drivers around here who can’t identify traffic lights. Or Give Way signs. Or speed signs.

Or think that yellow means go faster.

Hang on – that’s accepted standard practice isn’t it?

In some places, yes.

There are no yellow traffic lights in Brisbane.

The middle light is of a shade known as ‘Brisbane Green’.

Trump – Reduce to posting on MySpace:

Rule 303 said:

Trump – Reduce to posting on MySpace:

pay that

:)

party_pants said:

Rule 303 said:

Trump – Reduce to posting on MySpace:

pay that

:)

He might come here

Cymek said:

party_pants said:

Rule 303 said:

Trump – Reduce to posting on MySpace:

pay that

:)

He might come here

Noooo

Rule 303 said:

Trump – Reduce to posting on MySpace:

Just discovered that Myspace is still going.

I wonder who uses it.

Cymek said:

party_pants said:

Rule 303 said:

Trump – Reduce to posting on MySpace:

pay that

:)

He might come here

Don’t tease PWM like that. It’s bad enough that he can see Scomo and BoJo any day on TV.

Cymek said:

party_pants said:

Rule 303 said:

Trump – Reduce to posting on MySpace:

pay that

:)

He might come here

I’ll queue up to punch him in the face.

party_pants said:

Cymek said:

party_pants said:

pay that

:)

He might come here

I’ll queue up to punch him in the face.

Ha!

party_pants said:

Cymek said:

party_pants said:

pay that

:)

He might come here

I’ll queue up to punch him in the face.

He’ll bite your hand off with his false choppers.

Michael V said:

party_pants said:

Cymek said:

He might come here

I’ll queue up to punch him in the face.

Ha!

I’ll email CB88

sarahs mum said:

Good one.

sarahs mum said:

Michael V said:

party_pants said:

I’ll queue up to punch him in the face.

Ha!

I’ll email CB88

Why?

Cymek said:

party_pants said:

Rule 303 said:

Trump – Reduce to posting on MySpace:

pay that

:)

He might come here

Ha! Have you read wookie? he already is…

sarahs mum said:

Sums up peoples thoughts very effectively.

sarahs mum said:

Worth well over 1000 words.

The Rev Dodgson said:

sarahs mum said:

Worth well over 1000 words.

I think he probably should be playing a fiddle.

Unsure if this has been posted here…

Rule 303 said:

valid point.

Dark Orange said:

John Kothos
5 mins ·

sarahs mum said:

John Kothos
5 mins ·

The cognitive distortion is incredible.

sarahs mum said:

John Kothos
5 mins ·

The ol’ random alt-right melting pot of miscellaneous moaning, overflowing up its own arse.

:D

Tips from Lee Lin Chin

dv said:

Tips from Lee Lin Chin

ROFL

dv said:

Tips from Lee Lin Chin

:)

Was this you Sibeen? :-P

Witty Rejoinder said:

Was this you Sibeen? :-P

Fuck. We’d better change the flag before we get bombed by Biden on Jan 22.

Witty Rejoinder said:

Was this you Sibeen? :-P

Yep, I ducked over there between moving house and doing all the associated clean-up. I sure am shagged, and the taste of mace is so hard to get rid of.

party_pants said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Was this you Sibeen? :-P

Fuck. We’d better change the flag before we get bombed by Biden on Jan 22.

It’s OK, Vienna gets a flogging.

sibeen said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Was this you Sibeen? :-P

Yep, I ducked over there between moving house and doing all the associated clean-up. I sure am shagged, and the taste of mace is so hard to get rid of.

Used sparingly, mace is actually a very pleasant spice, akin to nutmeg which is not surprising as it comes from the outer covering of the nutmeg seed.

sibeen said:

party_pants said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Was this you Sibeen? :-P

Fuck. We’d better change the flag before we get bombed by Biden on Jan 22.

It’s OK, Vienna gets a flogging.

this mean nothing to me :)

Bubblecar said:

sibeen said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Was this you Sibeen? :-P

Yep, I ducked over there between moving house and doing all the associated clean-up. I sure am shagged, and the taste of mace is so hard to get rid of.

Used sparingly, mace is actually a very pleasant spice, akin to nutmeg which is not surprising as it comes from the outer covering of the nutmeg seed.

Language warning.

dv said:

not on board with the open access journals then eh

SCIENCE said:

dv said:

not on board with the open access journals then eh

Do you know how much the authors are charged to go open access in a peer reviewed journal? It is thousands of dollars.

The cost to go open access:

https://www.nature.com/news/open-access-the-true-cost-of-science-publishing-1.12676

buffy said:

The cost to go open access:

https://www.nature.com/news/open-access-the-true-cost-of-science-publishing-1.12676

A more recent piece:

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/11/9500-nature-journals-will-now-make-your-paper-free-read

buffy said:

SCIENCE said:

dv said:

not on board with the open access journals then eh

Do you know how much the authors are charged to go open access in a peer reviewed journal? It is thousands of dollars.

The cost to go open access:

https://www.nature.com/news/open-access-the-true-cost-of-science-publishing-1.12676

so what you’re saying is, it really is on “YOU” that SCIENCE* isn’t getting the $129.95 / 72h it needs to deliver quality

*: not the journal

and that you never use sci-hub

buffy said:

SCIENCE said:

dv said:

not on board with the open access journals then eh

Do you know how much the authors are charged to go open access in a peer reviewed journal? It is thousands of dollars.

Of course if you email the authors they are happy to send it for free. True story.

dv said:

Fair call.

dv said:

buffy said:

SCIENCE said:

not on board with the open access journals then eh

Do you know how much the authors are charged to go open access in a peer reviewed journal? It is thousands of dollars.

Of course if you email the authors they are happy to send it for free. True story.

Did they eventually get a cease and desist ruling after you went all B.C. on them?

dv said:

buffy said:

SCIENCE said:

not on board with the open access journals then eh

Do you know how much the authors are charged to go open access in a peer reviewed journal? It is thousands of dollars.

Of course if you email the authors they are happy to send it for free. True story.

Yeah, but if you are looking for a lot of papers, that’s a lot of emailing.

Witty Rejoinder said:

dv said:

buffy said:

Do you know how much the authors are charged to go open access in a peer reviewed journal? It is thousands of dollars.

Of course if you email the authors they are happy to send it for free. True story.

Did they eventually get a cease and desist ruling after you went all B.C. on them?

No… srsly they’ll just email it. I’m not being sarcastic. Usually they are happy to answer questions about the work.

sarahs mum said:

I like that one :)

party_pants said:

sarahs mum said:

I like that one :)

As did I…

dv said:

Even the cat is unimpressed.

dv said:

:)

Rule 303 said:

I can imagine many of them being gullible enough to do that.

When the supermarket shelves are empty…

If only…

Dark Orange said:

If only…

That would explain, although not excuse, a great deal.

fsm said:

And believe it or not…I actually knew the “real” names being referred to…

:)

buffy said:

fsm said:

And believe it or not…I actually knew the “real” names being referred to…

:)

:)

Strangely enough, so did I.

buffy said:

fsm said:

And believe it or not…I actually knew the “real” names being referred to…

:)

Same here :)

Fortunately they are all fairly ancient bands ;)

fsm said:

Giggle.

fsm said:

The Trolling Clones.

sarahs mum said:

LOL.

:-)

sarahs mum said:

Two Wongs for a white?

sarahs mum said:

Like. Muchly Like.

:)

Witty Rejoinder said:

sarahs mum said:

Two Wongs for a white?

oooo. :(

sarahs mum said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

sarahs mum said:

Two Wongs for a white?

oooo. :(

all 4 Chan

sarahs mum said:

I’m sure she’ll continue to post wherever the swastika is welcome, or at least tolerated.

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

I’m sure she’ll continue to post wherever the swastika is welcome, or at least tolerated.

They are not all right-wing nincompoops. They have been sold a pup by a very cleaver unscrupulous salesman and they believe what he says.

sarahs mum said:

I dunno… before McCormack was just a bloke devoid of any personality at all.
Now we know he’s a total dickhead.

Possibly not up to our usual standard, but it made me laugh.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1381823908821246&set=p.1381823908821246&type=3

buffy said:

Possibly not up to our usual standard, but it made me laugh.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1381823908821246&set=p.1381823908821246&type=3

buffy said:

Possibly not up to our usual standard, but it made me laugh.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1381823908821246&set=p.1381823908821246&type=3

Heh.

sarahs mum said:

buffy said:

Possibly not up to our usual standard, but it made me laugh.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1381823908821246&set=p.1381823908821246&type=3

:)

Greta Thunberg
10 hrs ·

sarahs mum said:

Greta Thunberg
10 hrs ·

That pretty much sums it all up.

Michael V said:

sarahs mum said:

Greta Thunberg
10 hrs ·

That pretty much sums it all up.

I’m willing to work for the DV party.

Michael V said:

sarahs mum said:

Greta Thunberg
10 hrs ·

That pretty much sums it all up.

where’s Australia on there we only see players with their hands up

sarahs mum said:

LOL

Michael V said:

sarahs mum said:

LOL

It is a classic.

roughbarked said:

Michael V said:

sarahs mum said:

LOL

It is a classic.

It’s an understatement

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

Michael V said:

LOL

It is a classic.

It’s an understatement

Can’t be right. The Nazis were much better led.

Tamb said:

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

It is a classic.

It’s an understatement

Can’t be right. The Nazis were much better led.

no need to reinvent the wheel right

SCIENCE said:

Tamb said:

SCIENCE said:

It’s an understatement

Can’t be right. The Nazis were much better led.

no need to reinvent the wheel right

Cheap American copy.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=54iMk_o0iNo

Hands around Scotland
10 hrs ·
Modern Britain…

sarahs mum said:

Hands around Scotland
10 hrs ·
Modern Britain…

The Education Act of 1921 set out the criteria for free school meals eligibility. However, a miners’ strike that year increased the cost of offering meals to around £1 million. The Board of Education tried to limit the cost to the central government to just £300,000 by setting up a rationing system.Nov 2, 2020

It is just typical Tory nastiness. What would have been more efficient is if the government just issued some supermarket vouchers so families can go and buy the required food themselves. Needing someone to pack bags full of food and then distribute them to homes seems the least efficient way of doing it. All based on a few Tory MPs standing up in the house and claiming (without anything more than anecdotal evidence) that people would spend their vouchers on drugs and prostitution.

party_pants said:

It is just typical Tory nastiness. What would have been more efficient is if the government just issued some supermarket vouchers so families can go and buy the required food themselves. Needing someone to pack bags full of food and then distribute them to homes seems the least efficient way of doing it. All based on a few Tory MPs standing up in the house and claiming (without anything more than anecdotal evidence) that people would spend their vouchers on drugs and prostitution.

Can you get drugs and prostitution at Tescos now?

party_pants said:

It is just typical Tory nastiness. What would have been more efficient is if the government just issued some supermarket vouchers so families can go and buy the required food themselves. Needing someone to pack bags full of food and then distribute them to homes seems the least efficient way of doing it. All based on a few Tory MPs standing up in the house and claiming (without anything more than anecdotal evidence) that people would spend their vouchers on drugs and prostitution.

Like the Indue eh?

dv said:

party_pants said:

It is just typical Tory nastiness. What would have been more efficient is if the government just issued some supermarket vouchers so families can go and buy the required food themselves. Needing someone to pack bags full of food and then distribute them to homes seems the least efficient way of doing it. All based on a few Tory MPs standing up in the house and claiming (without anything more than anecdotal evidence) that people would spend their vouchers on drugs and prostitution.

Can you get drugs and prostitution at Tescos now?

Hookers and dealers take vouchers in lieu of cash… or something.

sarahs mum said:

party_pants said:

It is just typical Tory nastiness. What would have been more efficient is if the government just issued some supermarket vouchers so families can go and buy the required food themselves. Needing someone to pack bags full of food and then distribute them to homes seems the least efficient way of doing it. All based on a few Tory MPs standing up in the house and claiming (without anything more than anecdotal evidence) that people would spend their vouchers on drugs and prostitution.

Like the Indue eh?

Just supermarket vouchers. No card scheme necessary.

party_pants said:

sarahs mum said:

party_pants said:

It is just typical Tory nastiness. What would have been more efficient is if the government just issued some supermarket vouchers so families can go and buy the required food themselves. Needing someone to pack bags full of food and then distribute them to homes seems the least efficient way of doing it. All based on a few Tory MPs standing up in the house and claiming (without anything more than anecdotal evidence) that people would spend their vouchers on drugs and prostitution.

Like the Indue eh?

Just supermarket vouchers. No card scheme necessary.

The assumption that people in poverty will fritter..

http://paulinehanson.com.au

OOOo. roffle. Roffle more.

sarahs mum said:

http://paulinehanson.com.au

OOOo. roffle. Roffle more.

That works. :)

sarahs mum said:

http://paulinehanson.com.au

OOOo. roffle. Roffle more.

Now that is champagne humour.

sibeen said:

sarahs mum said:

http://paulinehanson.com.au

OOOo. roffle. Roffle more.

Now that is champagne humour.

it is that.

I needed a bit of joy.

sarahs mum said:

I needed a bit of joy.

Does the heart good.

I didn’t laugh at the Hanson thing but I did smile

dv said:

I didn’t laugh at the Hanson thing but I did smile

That’s enough.

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

I didn’t laugh at the Hanson thing but I did smile

That’s enough.

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

I didn’t laugh at the Hanson thing but I did smile

That’s enough.

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

Apparently she let it lapse?
Which basically means she doesn’t own it any more? Not sure of the legalities on that.

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

That’s enough.

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

Apparently she let it lapse?
Which basically means she doesn’t own it any more? Not sure of the legalities on that.

It’s going to be someone else’s fault. She wouldn’t personally be looking after her website I don’t expect.

sarahs mum said:

roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

Apparently she let it lapse?
Which basically means she doesn’t own it any more? Not sure of the legalities on that.

It’s going to be someone else’s fault. She wouldn’t personally be looking after her website I don’t expect.

That sounds probable.

sarahs mum said:

http://paulinehanson.com.au

OOOo. roffle. Roffle more.

:)

sarahs mum said:

http://paulinehanson.com.au

OOOo. roffle. Roffle more.

Heeheehee

sarahs mum said:

http://paulinehanson.com.au

OOOo. roffle. Roffle more.

Nice work.

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

I didn’t laugh at the Hanson thing but I did smile

That’s enough.

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

That’s enough.

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Domain names aren’t personal belongings. I can buy permeatefree.com.au and post any old shit I want on there.

Divine Angel said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Domain names aren’t personal belongings. I can buy permeatefree.com.au and post any old shit I want on there.

It’s available…

Divine Angel said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Domain names aren’t personal belongings. I can buy permeatefree.com.au and post any old shit I want on there.

I did say something like that when I saw PF’s post.

dv said:

Divine Angel said:

Michael V said:

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Domain names aren’t personal belongings. I can buy permeatefree.com.au and post any old shit I want on there.

It’s available…

Waste money on fighting with PF? Can do that here for free.

roughbarked said:

dv said:

Divine Angel said:

Domain names aren’t personal belongings. I can buy permeatefree.com.au and post any old shit I want on there.

It’s available…

Waste money on fighting with PF? Can do that here for free.

PF could always register Permeatefree.com.au if permeatefree.com.au was taken.

Tamb said:

roughbarked said:

dv said:

It’s available…

Waste money on fighting with PF? Can do that here for free.

PF could always register Permeatefree.com.au if permeatefree.com.au was taken.

Stop The Steal

Tamb said:

roughbarked said:

dv said:

It’s available…

Waste money on fighting with PF? Can do that here for free.

PF could always register Permeatefree.com.au if permeatefree.com.au was taken.

It’s case-blind…

dv said:

Tamb said:

roughbarked said:

Waste money on fighting with PF? Can do that here for free.

PF could always register Permeatefree.com.au if permeatefree.com.au was taken.

It’s case-blind…

OK then permeatesfree.com.au

I thought there were new rules or guidelines that stopped people from grabbing domain names from prominent people or organisations? There was a spate of people buying domain names and basically holding them to ransom.

sibeen said:

I thought there were new rules or guidelines that stopped people from grabbing domain names from prominent people or organisations? There was a spate of people buying domain names and basically holding them to ransom.

https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-professional-name/

https://www.claytonutz.com/knowledge/2018/september/evicting-cybersquatters-what-to-do-when-someone-registers-your-brand-as-a-domain-name

sibeen said:

I thought there were new rules or guidelines that stopped people from grabbing domain names from prominent people or organisations? There was a spate of people buying domain names and basically holding them to ransom.

Someone tried to do that to our visitor centre but miscued and grabbed visitorscentre not visitorcentre.

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

That’s enough.

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

also, the name Pauline Hanson isn’t exclusive to her… I know another Pauline Hanson…

Arts said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

also, the name Pauline Hanson isn’t exclusive to her… I know another Pauline Hanson…

Don’t be ridiculous, they knew exactly what they were doing without any thought as to the consequences to the individual. It was a very low nasty move to damage a person as much as they could. The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her. If you think that is acceptable, then you should consider what your feelings would be if someone took over something that was important to you because they just wanted to cause you pain. We seem to be going the way of Trump with these immoral, could not care less attitudes.

PermeateFree said:

Arts said:

Michael V said:

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

also, the name Pauline Hanson isn’t exclusive to her… I know another Pauline Hanson…

Don’t be ridiculous, they knew exactly what they were doing without any thought as to the consequences to the individual. It was a very low nasty move to damage a person as much as they could. The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her. If you think that is acceptable, then you should consider what your feelings would be if someone took over something that was important to you because they just wanted to cause you pain. We seem to be going the way of Trump with these immoral, could not care less attitudes.

Tough titties.

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

That’s enough.

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Again don’t be dumb, their aim was purely to create as much havoc in someone’s life as possible. I suppose you have never missed a deadline, but I bet with far less consequences.

Divine Angel said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Domain names aren’t personal belongings. I can buy permeatefree.com.au and post any old shit I want on there.

Geez you lefties are just so bloody nasty and morally corrupt.

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Again don’t be dumb, their aim was purely to create as much havoc in someone’s life as possible. I suppose you have never missed a deadline, but I bet with far less consequences.

It’s not as though they turned the website into a hate page. They redirected it to an admirable group who very few could object to.

PermeateFree said:

Divine Angel said:

Michael V said:

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Domain names aren’t personal belongings. I can buy permeatefree.com.au and post any old shit I want on there.

Geez you lefties are just so bloody nasty and morally corrupt.

offers PF a paper bag to blow in to

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Again don’t be dumb, their aim was purely to create as much havoc in someone’s life as possible. I suppose you have never missed a deadline, but I bet with far less consequences.

It’s not as though they turned the website into a hate page. They redirected it to an admirable group who very few could object to.

^^^

PermeateFree said:

Arts said:

Michael V said:

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

also, the name Pauline Hanson isn’t exclusive to her… I know another Pauline Hanson…

Don’t be ridiculous, they knew exactly what they were doing without any thought as to the consequences to the individual. It was a very low nasty move to damage a person as much as they could. The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her. If you think that is acceptable, then you should consider what your feelings would be if someone took over something that was important to you because they just wanted to cause you pain. We seem to be going the way of Trump with these immoral, could not care less attitudes.

I will still care about things that are important. I will still care about what is unjust. Excuse me if I don’t feel Pauline deserves my feelings or my care.

Divine Angel said:

Michael V said:

PermeateFree said:

I don’t like Pauline Hanson and think she a stupid person, but to steal something so personal of hers I think is hitting below the belt and will cause her so many problems. The person who did this must be either totally irresponsible and/or really hate her. Politics need not be so low.

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Domain names aren’t personal belongings. I can buy permeatefree.com.au and post any old shit I want on there.

I am only known by that name here and you lot have already accused me of everything you could think of, so go ahead, what you post will be nothing new. If it was something that affected my life as in the case of Hanson, then that is a very different matter, but I doubt if your arrogance would let you see that.

I have no sympathy for PH

One Nation responds to Pauline Hanson website redirecting to refugee charity

One Nation says it will do “everything in its power” to stop both “illegal arrivals” entering Australia and people “illegally squatting” on domain names, after discovering a website with Pauline Hanson’s name redirects to the Refugee Council of Australia.

more…

Tau.Neutrino said:

PermeateFree said:

Arts said:

also, the name Pauline Hanson isn’t exclusive to her… I know another Pauline Hanson…

Don’t be ridiculous, they knew exactly what they were doing without any thought as to the consequences to the individual. It was a very low nasty move to damage a person as much as they could. The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her. If you think that is acceptable, then you should consider what your feelings would be if someone took over something that was important to you because they just wanted to cause you pain. We seem to be going the way of Trump with these immoral, could not care less attitudes.

Tough titties.

You don’t give a shit about how you might cause immense harm to someone, yet you come here preaching about how everyone one else is a bastard, whilst you are perfect. Look in a mirror hypocrite.

PermeateFree said:

Geez you lefties

The veil drops

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

Michael V said:

What?

The domain name expired.

Hanson didn’t pay the fee.

Somebody else did.

They didn’t steal the domain name, they bought it.

Again don’t be dumb, their aim was purely to create as much havoc in someone’s life as possible. I suppose you have never missed a deadline, but I bet with far less consequences.

It’s not as though they turned the website into a hate page. They redirected it to an admirable group who very few could object to.

So you don’t like her politics, neither do I, but there is no need to race her to the bottom.

PermeateFree said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

PermeateFree said:

Don’t be ridiculous, they knew exactly what they were doing without any thought as to the consequences to the individual. It was a very low nasty move to damage a person as much as they could. The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her. If you think that is acceptable, then you should consider what your feelings would be if someone took over something that was important to you because they just wanted to cause you pain. We seem to be going the way of Trump with these immoral, could not care less attitudes.

Tough titties.

You don’t give a shit about how you might cause immense harm to someone, yet you come here preaching about how everyone one else is a bastard, whilst you are perfect. Look in a mirror hypocrite.

Your hot air valve is broken.

PermeateFree said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

Again don’t be dumb, their aim was purely to create as much havoc in someone’s life as possible. I suppose you have never missed a deadline, but I bet with far less consequences.

It’s not as though they turned the website into a hate page. They redirected it to an admirable group who very few could object to.

So you don’t like her politics, neither do I, but there is no need to race her to the bottom.

Of all the things to worry about this doesn’t rate very highly IMO.

>The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her.

Goodo, she’s an evil person who deserves to be inconvenienced. As for “demeaning”, she’s does that to herself every time she opens her mouth.

sarahs mum said:

PermeateFree said:

Arts said:

also, the name Pauline Hanson isn’t exclusive to her… I know another Pauline Hanson…

Don’t be ridiculous, they knew exactly what they were doing without any thought as to the consequences to the individual. It was a very low nasty move to damage a person as much as they could. The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her. If you think that is acceptable, then you should consider what your feelings would be if someone took over something that was important to you because they just wanted to cause you pain. We seem to be going the way of Trump with these immoral, could not care less attitudes.

I will still care about things that are important. I will still care about what is unjust. Excuse me if I don’t feel Pauline deserves my feelings or my care.

It is not just about Pauline Hanson, but the very act of doing something so personal and hateful. Have you any idea the problems this is going to cause?

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

PermeateFree said:

Don’t be ridiculous, they knew exactly what they were doing without any thought as to the consequences to the individual. It was a very low nasty move to damage a person as much as they could. The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her. If you think that is acceptable, then you should consider what your feelings would be if someone took over something that was important to you because they just wanted to cause you pain. We seem to be going the way of Trump with these immoral, could not care less attitudes.

I will still care about things that are important. I will still care about what is unjust. Excuse me if I don’t feel Pauline deserves my feelings or my care.

It is not just about Pauline Hanson, but the very act of doing something so personal and hateful. Have you any idea the problems this is going to cause?

Storm in a teacup.

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

Geez you lefties

The veil drops

Yes surprise, surprise, Lefties are just as bad as the far right. You are both fucking incredibly nasty.

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

PermeateFree said:

Don’t be ridiculous, they knew exactly what they were doing without any thought as to the consequences to the individual. It was a very low nasty move to damage a person as much as they could. The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her. If you think that is acceptable, then you should consider what your feelings would be if someone took over something that was important to you because they just wanted to cause you pain. We seem to be going the way of Trump with these immoral, could not care less attitudes.

I will still care about things that are important. I will still care about what is unjust. Excuse me if I don’t feel Pauline deserves my feelings or my care.

It is not just about Pauline Hanson, but the very act of doing something so personal and hateful. Have you any idea the problems this is going to cause?

How is it hateful? It’s certainly less hateful than PH’s xenophobia. What problems?

Tau.Neutrino said:

PermeateFree said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

Tough titties.

You don’t give a shit about how you might cause immense harm to someone, yet you come here preaching about how everyone one else is a bastard, whilst you are perfect. Look in a mirror hypocrite.

Your hot air valve is broken.

You ought to try looking for a bit of moral backbone.

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

It’s not as though they turned the website into a hate page. They redirected it to an admirable group who very few could object to.

So you don’t like her politics, neither do I, but there is no need to race her to the bottom.

Of all the things to worry about this doesn’t rate very highly IMO.

That is what is so tragic with many people here, because if you had any moral concern, you would.

PermeateFree said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

PermeateFree said:

You don’t give a shit about how you might cause immense harm to someone, yet you come here preaching about how everyone one else is a bastard, whilst you are perfect. Look in a mirror hypocrite.

Your hot air valve is broken.

You ought to try looking for a bit of moral backbone.

My morals are fine.

Pauline’s morals are not.

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

PermeateFree said:

Geez you lefties

The veil drops

Yes surprise, surprise, Lefties are just as bad as the far right. You are both fucking incredibly nasty.

Hmm, PF spewing hate all over the forum while condemning the rest of us for laughing at a mild joke played on hateful Pauline.

Bubblecar said:

>The creep that took it had no use for it other than to inconvenience and demean her.

Goodo, she’s an evil person who deserves to be inconvenienced. As for “demeaning”, she’s does that to herself every time she opens her mouth.

You both have a lot in common there.

Bubblecar said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

The veil drops

Yes surprise, surprise, Lefties are just as bad as the far right. You are both fucking incredibly nasty.

Hmm, PF spewing hate all over the forum while condemning the rest of us for laughing at a mild joke played on hateful Pauline.

PF’s hot air valve is broken…

A plumber will be around shortly to install a new pressure valve.

He doesn’t like us criticising Melania or Ivanka either.

He’s a special kind of White Knight who only rushes to the defence of awful women.

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

I will still care about things that are important. I will still care about what is unjust. Excuse me if I don’t feel Pauline deserves my feelings or my care.

It is not just about Pauline Hanson, but the very act of doing something so personal and hateful. Have you any idea the problems this is going to cause?

How is it hateful? It’s certainly less hateful than PH’s xenophobia. What problems?

Why am I surprised that you don’t understand. It is the action that took place not the person who suffered because of it. How would you like it if someone did that to you?

Tau.Neutrino said:

PermeateFree said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

Your hot air valve is broken.

You ought to try looking for a bit of moral backbone.

My morals are fine.

Pauline’s morals are not.

Due to you inability to see anything other than your own point of view, your morals are far from being fine.

Bubblecar said:

PermeateFree said:

dv said:

The veil drops

Yes surprise, surprise, Lefties are just as bad as the far right. You are both fucking incredibly nasty.

Hmm, PF spewing hate all over the forum while condemning the rest of us for laughing at a mild joke played on hateful Pauline.

You ought to be on the receiving end of all you spite. Just read your posts for all the venom you pour out to anyone that conflicts with you small world view of life.

Tau.Neutrino said:

Bubblecar said:

PermeateFree said:

Yes surprise, surprise, Lefties are just as bad as the far right. You are both fucking incredibly nasty.

Hmm, PF spewing hate all over the forum while condemning the rest of us for laughing at a mild joke played on hateful Pauline.

PF’s hot air valve is broken…

A plumber will be around shortly to install a new pressure valve.

You are a fool Tau, you live in a fantasy would.

PermeateFree said:

Bubblecar said:

PermeateFree said:

Yes surprise, surprise, Lefties are just as bad as the far right. You are both fucking incredibly nasty.

Hmm, PF spewing hate all over the forum while condemning the rest of us for laughing at a mild joke played on hateful Pauline.

You ought to be on the receiving end of all you spite. Just read your posts for all the venom you pour out to anyone that conflicts with you small world view of life.

Actually I’m a very mild-mannered chap :)

Bubblecar said:

He doesn’t like us criticising Melania or Ivanka either.

He’s a special kind of White Knight who only rushes to the defence of awful women.

No it is not the women, just your very, very nasty, bitchy score. You are not the refined individual you would like people to believe.

Bubblecar said:

Actually I’m a very mild-mannered chap :)

I can vouch for that. He’s also quite broad-minded.

So it’s not surprising that he looks down on bigots like Pauline.

PermeateFree said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

It is not just about Pauline Hanson, but the very act of doing something so personal and hateful. Have you any idea the problems this is going to cause?

How is it hateful? It’s certainly less hateful than PH’s xenophobia. What problems?

Why am I surprised that you don’t understand. It is the action that took place not the person who suffered because of it. How would you like it if someone did that to you?

Wouldn’t worry me. She’s a public figure with strident views on many issues. If her PR team lacks the common sense to maintain a her web-presence it’s no skin off my nose either.

Bubblecar said:

PermeateFree said:

Bubblecar said:

Hmm, PF spewing hate all over the forum while condemning the rest of us for laughing at a mild joke played on hateful Pauline.

You ought to be on the receiving end of all you spite. Just read your posts for all the venom you pour out to anyone that conflicts with you small world view of life.

Actually I’m a very mild-mannered chap :)

I know that is the image you like to portray, but we both know that is not true. You are another person here that lives in a fantasy world.

Bubblecar said:

Bubblecar said:

Actually I’m a very mild-mannered chap :)

I can vouch for that. He’s also quite broad-minded.

So it’s not surprising that he looks down on bigots like Pauline.

That just goes to show you don’t recognise your own bigotry.

PermeateFree said:

Bubblecar said:

Bubblecar said:

Actually I’m a very mild-mannered chap :)

I can vouch for that. He’s also quite broad-minded.

So it’s not surprising that he looks down on bigots like Pauline.

That just goes to show you don’t recognise your own bigotry.

Bigotry against who? Both Car and PH are of the same ethnicity.

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

Bubblecar said:

I can vouch for that. He’s also quite broad-minded.

So it’s not surprising that he looks down on bigots like Pauline.

That just goes to show you don’t recognise your own bigotry.

Bigotry against who? Both Car and PH are of the same ethnicity.

Bigotry does not have to be against anyone. Bigotry is a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

PermeateFree said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

That just goes to show you don’t recognise your own bigotry.

Bigotry against who? Both Car and PH are of the same ethnicity.

Bigotry does not have to be against anyone. Bigotry is a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

You’ve just described PH.

PermeateFree said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

That just goes to show you don’t recognise your own bigotry.

Bigotry against who? Both Car and PH are of the same ethnicity.

Bigotry does not have to be against anyone. Bigotry is a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

You mean like Pauline?

I’m very glad I’m nothing like her.

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Bigotry against who? Both Car and PH are of the same ethnicity.

Bigotry does not have to be against anyone. Bigotry is a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

You’ve just described PH.

It describes car too. You probably do not recognise it as you tend to agree with him on most things, as do many here.

Bubblecar said:

PermeateFree said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Bigotry against who? Both Car and PH are of the same ethnicity.

Bigotry does not have to be against anyone. Bigotry is a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

You mean like Pauline?

I’m very glad I’m nothing like her.

No, also very much like you too. You can be very nasty car.

PermeateFree said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

PermeateFree said:

Bigotry does not have to be against anyone. Bigotry is a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

You’ve just described PH.

It describes car too. You probably do not recognise it as you tend to agree with him on most things, as do many here.

Who is Car prejudiced against? Far right pollies are disliked by the majority of the population and most would think this website business is very amusing. I’m afraid your persecution complex is colouring your feelings.

PermeateFree said:

Bubblecar said:

PermeateFree said:

Bigotry does not have to be against anyone. Bigotry is a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

You mean like Pauline?

I’m very glad I’m nothing like her.

No, also very much like you too. You can be very nasty car.

Only when it’s called for, and certainly not against racial groups etc.

>Only when it’s called for

…very occasionally I’ll be unjustifiably nasty, but then I always apologise.

these memes aren’t very funny…

Bubblecar said:

PermeateFree said:

Bubblecar said:

You mean like Pauline?

I’m very glad I’m nothing like her.

No, also very much like you too. You can be very nasty car.

Only when it’s called for, and certainly not against racial groups etc.

With you it is anything that does not fit into your opinions, then your very spiteful attitude rises to the surface.

party_pants said:

these memes aren’t very funny…

and the argument isn’t worth the time and effort.

Bubblecar said:

>Only when it’s called for

…very occasionally I’ll be unjustifiably nasty, but then I always apologise.

Well there are vast numbers as you shit on just about everything and everyone. I call you the food poisoned pigeon.

sarahs mum said:

party_pants said:

these memes aren’t very funny…

and the argument isn’t worth the time and effort.

The problem here, is you cannot see past the person (PH) and see the very personal wrong that has been done with the sole objective of causing as much harm as possible.

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

party_pants said:

these memes aren’t very funny…

and the argument isn’t worth the time and effort.

The problem here, is you cannot see past the person (PH) and see the very personal wrong that has been done with the sole objective of causing as much harm as possible.

Well lets all just agree to disagree then, how about it skipper?

:)

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

party_pants said:

these memes aren’t very funny…

and the argument isn’t worth the time and effort.

The problem here, is you cannot see past the person (PH) and see the very personal wrong that has been done with the sole objective of causing as much harm as possible.

I think I can see past the person and see the harm she has done to various communities and the country.

sarahs mum said:

PermeateFree said:

sarahs mum said:

and the argument isn’t worth the time and effort.

The problem here, is you cannot see past the person (PH) and see the very personal wrong that has been done with the sole objective of causing as much harm as possible.

I think I can see past the person and see the harm she has done to various communities and the country.

Which means you can’t see past the person and see the act that has been committed.

sarahs mum said:

A friends car?

posted by Richard Marles.
There you go.

sarahs mum said:

posted by Richard Marles.
There you go.

Who?

sibeen said:

sarahs mum said:

posted by Richard Marles.
There you go.

Who?

Apparently he’s deputy leader of the Australian Labor Party.

Or so it says on the Internet.

sibeen said:

sarahs mum said:

posted by Richard Marles.
There you go.

Who?

How we laughed at Billy Shorten… those were the days.

sibeen said:

sarahs mum said:

posted by Richard Marles.
There you go.

Who?

You know…him.. the guy with no profile.