https://earthlymission.com/dinosaur-mummy-science-discovery-nodosaur-intact-canada/?fbclid=IwAR2wWqKTY7lykqaIexocCP6L16aepPxOVr1dXe-bVywjNbJldL54l3fjgdM

Scientists are hailing it as the best-preserved dinosaur specimen ever discovered. That’s why you cannot see its bones – they remain covered by intact skin and armor.

Found accidentally by miners in Canada, this fossilized nodosaur is more than 110 million years old, yet patterns are still visible on the skin. According to the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology in Alberta, Canada, which recently unveiled the find, the dinosaur is so well-preserved that instead of a ‘fossil’, we could safely call it a ‘dinosaur mummy.’

She’s a beauty.

Looks like a crocodile with extra spiky bits.

if nothing else it answers this question…

Arts said:

if nothing else it answers this question…

They’d only be found in a rock band.

Arts said:

https://earthlymission.com/dinosaur-mummy-science-discovery-nodosaur-intact-canada/?fbclid=IwAR2wWqKTY7lykqaIexocCP6L16aepPxOVr1dXe-bVywjNbJldL54l3fjgdM

Scientists are hailing it as the best-preserved dinosaur specimen ever discovered. That’s why you cannot see its bones – they remain covered by intact skin and armor.

Found accidentally by miners in Canada, this fossilized nodosaur is more than 110 million years old, yet patterns are still visible on the skin. According to the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology in Alberta, Canada, which recently unveiled the find, the dinosaur is so well-preserved that instead of a ‘fossil’, we could safely call it a ‘dinosaur mummy.’

“Recently” can mean a lot of things in National Geographic with the above nodosaur was when first reported by them Aug 3, 2017. It was also reported here (with illustrations) some time ago.

I posted a thread a few years ago, but it’s certainly worth another look.

Bubblecar said:

I posted a thread a few years ago, but it’s certainly worth another look.

ah, It came up on my Facebook feed today.. I thought it interesting enough to share at least.

S’great

This story is from 2017.

Nice stereo image (of another specimen) in that article.

Michael V said:

Nice stereo image (of another specimen) in that article.

I haven’t done one of those for ages – I’m pleased to say I can still stereo it!

buffy said:

Michael V said:

Nice stereo image (of another specimen) in that article.

I haven’t done one of those for ages – I’m pleased to say I can still stereo it!

is it meant to be near or far

dv said:

This story is from 2017.

it’s still good

dv said:

This story is from 2017.

I blame Arts.

sibeen said:

dv said:

This story is from 2017.

I blame Arts.

I’m just happy to be involved somehow

I was reading a dinosaur book recently, there was a dinosaur mummy mentioned. I don’t remember if it was a nodasaur.

Yeah nothing wrong with a review of something cool