Date: 10/06/2021 19:02:37
From: dv
ID: 1749764
Subject: $41 trillion

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/10/investing/climate-change-g7-investors/index.html
Investors holding $41 trillion demand action on climate — now
New York (CNN Business)Investors managing more than $41 trillion in assets are loudly calling on world leaders to immediately step up their climate game if they don’t want to miss out on a wave of clean energy investment.

More than 450 major investors signed a letter that was released Thursday urging governments to set more ambitious emission reduction targets, detail “clear” road maps to decarbonize pollution-heavy industries and implement mandatory climate risk disclosure requirements.
The letter, signed by Fidelity, State Street and other influential asset management firms, marks the strongest call yet from investors urging governments around the world to take bolder steps to fight the climate crisis. And it comes just as the leaders of G7 nations meet in the United Kingdom to discuss the Covid-19 pandemic, climate change and other major global issues.
“These gaps — in climate ambition, policy action and risk disclosure — need to be addressed with urgency,” the signatories wrote in the letter.
The not-so-subtle warning is that countries that drag their feet risk being left behind as investors send their money elsewhere.
“Those who set ambitious targets in line with achieving net-zero emissions, and implement consistent national climate policies in the short-to-medium term, will become increasingly attractive investment destinations,” the letter read. “Countries that fail to do so will find themselves at a competitive disadvantage.”

Reply Quote

Date: 10/06/2021 22:49:50
From: dv
ID: 1749874
Subject: re: $41 trillion

dv said:


https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/10/investing/climate-change-g7-investors/index.html
Investors holding $41 trillion demand action on climate — now
New York (CNN Business)Investors managing more than $41 trillion in assets are loudly calling on world leaders to immediately step up their climate game if they don’t want to miss out on a wave of clean energy investment.

More than 450 major investors signed a letter that was released Thursday urging governments to set more ambitious emission reduction targets, detail “clear” road maps to decarbonize pollution-heavy industries and implement mandatory climate risk disclosure requirements.
The letter, signed by Fidelity, State Street and other influential asset management firms, marks the strongest call yet from investors urging governments around the world to take bolder steps to fight the climate crisis. And it comes just as the leaders of G7 nations meet in the United Kingdom to discuss the Covid-19 pandemic, climate change and other major global issues.
“These gaps — in climate ambition, policy action and risk disclosure — need to be addressed with urgency,” the signatories wrote in the letter.
The not-so-subtle warning is that countries that drag their feet risk being left behind as investors send their money elsewhere.
“Those who set ambitious targets in line with achieving net-zero emissions, and implement consistent national climate policies in the short-to-medium term, will become increasingly attractive investment destinations,” the letter read. “Countries that fail to do so will find themselves at a competitive disadvantage.”

Probably a bit ho hum to you young kids but when I was a lad this was considered a large sum of money

Reply Quote

Date: 10/06/2021 22:53:17
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1749876
Subject: re: $41 trillion

What’s their motivation?

Reply Quote

Date: 10/06/2021 22:57:24
From: party_pants
ID: 1749879
Subject: re: $41 trillion

dv said:

Probably a bit ho hum to you young kids but when I was a lad this was considered a large sum of money

I can’t really comment much. We’ve been waiting for some real and tangible movement on this issue for decades. It sounds good.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/06/2021 23:36:30
From: dv
ID: 1749884
Subject: re: $41 trillion

Bubblecar said:


What’s their motivation?

Long term profit I would guess

Reply Quote

Date: 10/06/2021 23:40:44
From: sibeen
ID: 1749885
Subject: re: $41 trillion

I don’t want to appear to be a doubting Thomas but 41 Trillion is about 10% of the world’s total wealth. Do these funds really control that much?

Reply Quote

Date: 10/06/2021 23:57:35
From: dv
ID: 1749887
Subject: re: $41 trillion

Well, I just looked up the first one, (Fidelity Investments), and its assets under management are 10.4 trillion dollars.

The second, State Street Global Advisors, has 3.5 trillion.

So I’m not going to go through and add them all up but given that there are 450 investors on this list it is not difficult for me to believe they add up to 41 trillion.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/06/2021 00:01:53
From: sibeen
ID: 1749888
Subject: re: $41 trillion

dv said:


Well, I just looked up the first one, (Fidelity Investments), and its assets under management are 10.4 trillion dollars.

The second, State Street Global Advisors, has 3.5 trillion.

So I’m not going to go through and add them all up but given that there are 450 investors on this list it is not difficult for me to believe they add up to 41 trillion.

Wiki claim 4.7T for Fidelity Investments as of last year, which I admit has quite stunned me.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/06/2021 00:03:21
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1749889
Subject: re: $41 trillion

sibeen said:


dv said:

Well, I just looked up the first one, (Fidelity Investments), and its assets under management are 10.4 trillion dollars.

The second, State Street Global Advisors, has 3.5 trillion.

So I’m not going to go through and add them all up but given that there are 450 investors on this list it is not difficult for me to believe they add up to 41 trillion.

Wiki claim 4.7T for Fidelity Investments as of last year, which I admit has quite stunned me.

That’s a shedload of tea towels.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/06/2021 00:05:12
From: dv
ID: 1749890
Subject: re: $41 trillion

sibeen said:


dv said:

Well, I just looked up the first one, (Fidelity Investments), and its assets under management are 10.4 trillion dollars.

The second, State Street Global Advisors, has 3.5 trillion.

So I’m not going to go through and add them all up but given that there are 450 investors on this list it is not difficult for me to believe they add up to 41 trillion.

Wiki claim 4.7T for Fidelity Investments as of last year, which I admit has quite stunned me.

I suppose it is somewhat volatile these days

Reply Quote

Date: 11/06/2021 00:05:16
From: sibeen
ID: 1749891
Subject: re: $41 trillion

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

dv said:

Well, I just looked up the first one, (Fidelity Investments), and its assets under management are 10.4 trillion dollars.

The second, State Street Global Advisors, has 3.5 trillion.

So I’m not going to go through and add them all up but given that there are 450 investors on this list it is not difficult for me to believe they add up to 41 trillion.

Wiki claim 4.7T for Fidelity Investments as of last year, which I admit has quite stunned me.

That’s a shedload of tea towels.

Yeah, it comes under “assets under management” which appears to be quite a loose term.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/06/2021 00:05:21
From: party_pants
ID: 1749892
Subject: re: $41 trillion

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

dv said:

Well, I just looked up the first one, (Fidelity Investments), and its assets under management are 10.4 trillion dollars.

The second, State Street Global Advisors, has 3.5 trillion.

So I’m not going to go through and add them all up but given that there are 450 investors on this list it is not difficult for me to believe they add up to 41 trillion.

Wiki claim 4.7T for Fidelity Investments as of last year, which I admit has quite stunned me.

That’s a shedload of tea towels.

You’ll need a bigger shed.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/06/2021 00:08:56
From: sibeen
ID: 1749893
Subject: re: $41 trillion

dv said:


sibeen said:

dv said:

Well, I just looked up the first one, (Fidelity Investments), and its assets under management are 10.4 trillion dollars.

The second, State Street Global Advisors, has 3.5 trillion.

So I’m not going to go through and add them all up but given that there are 450 investors on this list it is not difficult for me to believe they add up to 41 trillion.

Wiki claim 4.7T for Fidelity Investments as of last year, which I admit has quite stunned me.

I suppose it is somewhat volatile these days

I’ll admit to snigeering at the “combined total customer asset value number of $8.3 trillion”. Telstra is a customer of mine, can I claim that I have a combined total customer asset value of over $40B?

Reply Quote

Date: 11/06/2021 00:21:53
From: sibeen
ID: 1749894
Subject: re: $41 trillion

sibeen said:


dv said:

sibeen said:

Wiki claim 4.7T for Fidelity Investments as of last year, which I admit has quite stunned me.

I suppose it is somewhat volatile these days

I’ll admit to snigeering at the “combined total customer asset value number of $8.3 trillion”. Telstra is a customer of mine, can I claim that I have a combined total customer asset value of over $40B?

Actually, belay that. I did some work for Pfizer this financial year. Christos, my combined total customer asset value is well over $200B.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/06/2021 00:26:12
From: dv
ID: 1749895
Subject: re: $41 trillion

sibeen said:


sibeen said:

dv said:

I suppose it is somewhat volatile these days

I’ll admit to snigeering at the “combined total customer asset value number of $8.3 trillion”. Telstra is a customer of mine, can I claim that I have a combined total customer asset value of over $40B?

Actually, belay that. I did some work for Pfizer this financial year. Christos, my combined total customer asset value is well over $200B.

Seems like AUM is a more meaningful number

Reply Quote

Date: 11/06/2021 00:27:28
From: sibeen
ID: 1749896
Subject: re: $41 trillion

dv said:


sibeen said:

sibeen said:

I’ll admit to snigeering at the “combined total customer asset value number of $8.3 trillion”. Telstra is a customer of mine, can I claim that I have a combined total customer asset value of over $40B?

Actually, belay that. I did some work for Pfizer this financial year. Christos, my combined total customer asset value is well over $200B.

Seems like AUM is a more meaningful number

Maybe :)

Reply Quote

Date: 14/06/2021 14:51:09
From: diddly-squat
ID: 1751295
Subject: re: $41 trillion

dv said:


Bubblecar said:

What’s their motivation?

Long term profit I would guess

This is it… changes in project financing for fossil fuel projects are well advanced and most of the world’s largest banks, investment funds, equity markets are no longer providing funding into what they see as long term investment risks – note that this isn’t strictly about reacting to science or even politics behind climate change, but is more a reflection of consumer sentiment. Almost all new investment in fossil fuel projects is being directly funded through the operating company’s own balance sheet or via cash from high net worth individuals.

Fun fact, capitalism will save the planet…

Reply Quote