Date: 3/07/2021 12:56:42
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1759581
Subject: Deep space atomic clock

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/atomic-clock-deep-space-travel-nasa-passed-first-test
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/tdm/clock/index.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Space_Atomic_Clock

NASA’s Deep Space Atomic Clock, which launched on a satellite in June 2019, outperformed all other clocks in space during its first year in orbit around Earth. The clock, DSAC for short, was at least 10 times more stable than clocks on GPS satellites.

To navigate the solar system today, space probes listen for signals from antennas on Earth and then bounce those signals back. Ultraprecise, refrigerator-sized atomic clocks on the ground measure that round trip time.

A future spacecraft carrying a toaster oven–sized DSAC could simply measure how long it takes a signal from Earth to arrive and calculate its own position.

DSAC is so stable because it keeps time using ions, rather than neutral atoms. Bottling ions within electric fields prevents those atoms from bumping into the walls of their container. Such interactions cause the neutral atoms in GPS satellite clocks to lose their rhythm.

For space exploration, atomic clocks must be extremely precise: an error of even one second can mean the difference between landing on Mars or missing it by hundreds of thousands of miles. Up to 50 times more stable than the atomic clocks on GPS satellites, the mercury-ion Deep Space Atomic Clock loses less than 1 nanosecond in 10 days (less than one second every 10 million years).

Its applications in deep space include:

I haven’t yet found out how much this atomic clock weighs. The satellite payload is 17.5 kg but the atomic clock is only a small part of that weight.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/07/2021 13:01:00
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1759588
Subject: re: Deep space atomic clock

>Deep Space Atomic Clock loses less than 1 nanosecond in 10 days (less than one second every 10 million years)

That’s impressive.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/07/2021 13:02:55
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1759589
Subject: re: Deep space atomic clock

Bubblecar said:


>Deep Space Atomic Clock loses less than 1 nanosecond in 10 days (less than one second every 10 million years)

That’s impressive.

+1

Reply Quote

Date: 3/07/2021 19:35:43
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1759830
Subject: re: Deep space atomic clock

Tau.Neutrino said:


Bubblecar said:

>Deep Space Atomic Clock loses less than 1 nanosecond in 10 days (less than one second every 10 million years)

That’s impressive.

+1

Now if I could just have one as a wrist watch.

Even a wrist watch with less than one second every 10 years would suffice.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/07/2021 19:39:36
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 1759832
Subject: re: Deep space atomic clock

mollwollfumble said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Bubblecar said:

>Deep Space Atomic Clock loses less than 1 nanosecond in 10 days (less than one second every 10 million years)

That’s impressive.

+1

Now if I could just have one as a wrist watch.

Even a wrist watch with less than one second every 10 years would suffice.

Too easy – Get a smart watch that has a wifi or Bluetooth connection to your phone. It’ll update the time whenever the phone is in range and so be in time all the time.

Maybe something like Watchy

Reply Quote

Date: 4/07/2021 04:19:26
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1759946
Subject: re: Deep space atomic clock

Spiny Norman said:


mollwollfumble said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

+1

Now if I could just have one as a wrist watch.

Even a wrist watch with less than one second every 10 years would suffice.

Too easy – Get a smart watch that has a wifi or Bluetooth connection to your phone. It’ll update the time whenever the phone is in range and so be in time all the time.

Maybe something like Watchy

Don’t have a smart phone. Gave it away. Recipient has now managed to lock it in a mode that makes it unusable.
More trouble than they’re worth.

Reply Quote

Date: 4/07/2021 04:38:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1759948
Subject: re: Deep space atomic clock

time is overrated anyway

Reply Quote

Date: 4/07/2021 08:22:50
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1759958
Subject: re: Deep space atomic clock

SCIENCE said:


time is overrated anyway

We got no time for thoughts like that.

Reply Quote