There is a piece in the latest Scientific American about effects of DDT a couple of generations down.
“Using more than 200 mother-daughter-granddaughter triads, Cohn’s team found that the granddaughters of those in the top third of DDT exposure during pregnancy had 2.6 times the odds of developing an unhealthy BMI. They were also more than twice as likely to have started their periods before age 11. Both factors, Cohn says, are known to raise the risk of later developing breast cancer and cardiovascular disease.”
Here is the link to the paper. Yet again I can’t get SciHub to work, so it’s only the abstract. (Maybe it’s moved again, that happens)
https://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2021/04/13/1055-9965.EPI-20-1456
Now I can think of a confounding factor for this. I would expect the greatest DDT exposure back in the day would have been in poorer districts, where the marshy land was less desirable. Those parts of society in the US also have the worse problems with obesity. So this could purely be a social thing.
Also, as menarche age is at least partly kicked off by reaching a certain body weight, chubbier girls will get there earlier anyway.