Date: 16/08/2021 08:01:28
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1778284
Subject: Articles 16 Aug

What Is Conversational Intelligence and Why Does It Matter?
The Neurological Differences Between Psychopaths and Sociopaths
Check out these 10 science-fiction books for your summer reading
Matter From Light. Physicists Create Matter and Antimatter by Colliding Just Photons.
V404 Cygni: Huge Rings Around a Black Hole
Team find brain mechanism that automatically links objects in our minds
A holistic approach to materials for the next generation of electrical insulation
What God, Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness Have in Common
Why boiling droplets can race across hot oily surfaces
Deforestation leads to flight loss in New Zealand insects
Which way will paper maps go in the future? Cartographer says they’ll still be crucial, even with GPS
How do vaccinated people spread Delta? What the science says
Physicists Create a Bizarre ‘Wigner Crystal’ Made Purely of Electrons
What is static electricity? We may finally have an answer
The metaverse: From science fiction to virtual reality
Why Nikola Tesla was obsessed with the Egyptian pyramids
Beauty bias: hopefully the judge finds you attractive
Engineer Suspends Particles Using A Single Beam Of Light – Digg
Is space infinite? We asked 5 experts
A wonderful moment in the history of astronomy – the first capture of light emanating from a black hole
7 Pieces of Art Inspired by the Night Sky
Here’s Why Seeing The Edge Of Rain Is So Rare – Digg

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 08:37:41
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1778292
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Ive seen the edge of rain while in a car, we drove up to it.

Ive seen the edge of rain moving towards me as a wall of water, while I was outside looking at the weather.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 08:52:38
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1778300
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Tau.Neutrino said:


Ive seen the edge of rain while in a car, we drove up to it.

Ive seen the edge of rain moving towards me as a wall of water, while I was outside looking at the weather.

We had that in Bargara one time. At the end of our street, it was raining, and there was a very clear and definite boundary to it, which was not moving. It was a curtain of rain.

If you stood here, you were untouched, dry.Take three or four paces to over there and you’d get soaked.

Very odd.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 08:53:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 1778301
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

captain_spalding said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Ive seen the edge of rain while in a car, we drove up to it.

Ive seen the edge of rain moving towards me as a wall of water, while I was outside looking at the weather.

We had that in Bargara one time. At the end of our street, it was raining, and there was a very clear and definite boundary to it, which was not moving. It was a curtain of rain.

If you stood here, you were untouched, dry.Take three or four paces to over there and you’d get soaked.

Very odd.


Out here on the plains, that is seen often.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:00:53
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1778305
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Proper link for the article Is Space Infinite? We Asked 5 Experts:

https://theconversation.com/is-space-infinite-we-asked-5-experts-165742

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:14:35
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1778315
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Bubblecar said:


Proper link for the article Is Space Infinite? We Asked 5 Experts:

https://theconversation.com/is-space-infinite-we-asked-5-experts-165742

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:16:28
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778317
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Bubblecar said:


Proper link for the article Is Space Infinite? We Asked 5 Experts:

https://theconversation.com/is-space-infinite-we-asked-5-experts-165742

I know this is a pop-sci article, but even so it seems strange to me that responses that explain examples of how a finite or infinite may be possible are classified as “no” or “yes”, rather than “maybe”, which is of course the only sensible answer.

And I still don’t accept that the “Universe” can’t be finite with a defined boundary.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:19:56
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778319
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Bubblecar said:


Bubblecar said:

Proper link for the article Is Space Infinite? We Asked 5 Experts:

https://theconversation.com/is-space-infinite-we-asked-5-experts-165742

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:21:18
From: Dark Orange
ID: 1778320
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


Bubblecar said:

Bubblecar said:

Proper link for the article Is Space Infinite? We Asked 5 Experts:

https://theconversation.com/is-space-infinite-we-asked-5-experts-165742

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Maybe.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:23:47
From: Michael V
ID: 1778321
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


Bubblecar said:

Bubblecar said:

Proper link for the article Is Space Infinite? We Asked 5 Experts:

https://theconversation.com/is-space-infinite-we-asked-5-experts-165742

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Don’t know.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:24:54
From: Dark Orange
ID: 1778322
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


Bubblecar said:

Bubblecar said:

Proper link for the article Is Space Infinite? We Asked 5 Experts:

https://theconversation.com/is-space-infinite-we-asked-5-experts-165742

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Not really.
Maybe = possible
Don’t know for sure = likely
Don’t know = we have no idea

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:29:19
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778323
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Dark Orange said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Bubblecar said:

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Not really.
Maybe = possible
Don’t know for sure = likely
Don’t know = we have no idea

If you “don’t now” then it must be considered possible, so how is that different to “maybe”?

“Don’t know for sure” could just as well be unlikely as likely.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:29:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 1778324
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Dark Orange said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Bubblecar said:

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Not really.
Maybe = likely possible
Don’t know for sure = unlikely
Don’t know = we have no idea


Maybe not = it likely isn’t

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:31:09
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778325
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Dark Orange said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Bubblecar said:

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Not really.
Maybe = possible
Don’t know for sure = likely
Don’t know = we have no idea

And we’ve now had a maybe, don’t know, and no response.

Can we have a yes from someone?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:32:59
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778327
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

roughbarked said:


Dark Orange said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Not really.
Maybe = likely possible
Don’t know for sure = unlikely
Don’t know = we have no idea


Maybe not = it likely isn’t

No it isn’t.

“Maybe not” indicates that it is possible that it isn’t (or seems to be possible), with no indication of the probability.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:35:20
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1778328
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Off topic, but …

Still two and a half months to launch of the James Webb. “NASA now is targeting Oct. 31, 2021”. I can’t wait.
Not much James Webb Telescope news other than:

Not much news on the SKA either, other than:

https://www.space.com/square-kilometer-array-telescope-construction-starts

Construction of the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) observatory, which is set to become the largest radio telescope ever built, will finally commence after nearly 30 years of preparations.

Work on the two sites in Australia and South Africa, where the two separate parts of the radio telescope network will be built, is set to begin July 1, 2021, representatives of the SKA Organisation (SKAO) announced at the annual meeting of the European Astronomical Society (EAS) on June 29.

The telescope, which will listen to radio signals in the vast range of frequencies between 70 MHz to at least 25 GHz, will have a total collecting area of one square kilometer. Instead of relying on a single extremely large dish, it will consist of a precisely designed network of dishes and antennas distributed across its two sites. The SKA-Mid array, to be located in the Karoo desert in South Africa, will use 197 dishes, each 50 feet (15 meters) in diameter, to listen to the middle frequency bands. The SKA-Low array, listening to the lower frequency bands, will consist of 131,072 antennas located in Western Australia north of Perth.

https://physicsworld.com/a/construction-go-ahead-for-e2bn-square-kilometre-array/

The go-ahead has been given to build what will be the world’s largest radio telescope network. The council of the Square Kilometre Array Observatory (SKAO) gave the green light to construct the €2bn Square Kilometre Array (SKA) in Australia and southern Africa. To be complete by 2028.

As its name suggests, the SKA is a facility that intends to have a total collecting area of 1 km2, achieved by spreading out thousands of individual dishes in southern Africa as well as a million wire antennas in Australia. SKA is designed to provide astronomers with unprecedented views of the first stars in the universe and observations of gravitational waves via the radio emissions from pulsars, among other things.

That initial design, however, proved too ambitious and in 2013 officials concentrated on building a much smaller preliminary facility known as SKA1, which was to be complete by 2018. It would feature 250 mid-frequency radio dishes and 250,000 low-frequency dipole antenna to keep costs below a cap of €674m. Despite further woes with members dropping out, such as Germany, and increases in the baseline cost of the project to €900m, that timeline was delayed. Yet a big boost for the project came in March 2019 when Australia, China, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, South Africa and the UK signed the SKA convention treaty in Rome. That came into effect earlier this year after five countries – including Australia, South Africa and the UK – ratified the convention, creating the SKAO in the process.

More than 500 engineers from 100 institutions worldwide have been involved with the design of the SKA telescopes with over 1000 scientists from 40 countries working on the science case of the project. The final SKA design to be built — similar to that proposed for SKA 1 — includes 197 radio dishes in South Africa, including 64 dishes belonging to the existing MeerKAT array, as well as 131 072 individual antennas in Australia. The cost of constructing the two telescope arrays and operations for the coming decade will be about €2bn – €1.3bn to build the instrument and €700m for operations. The UK, which hosts the headquarters of the observatory at the Jodrell Bank site in Cheshire, will contribute £270m.

SKA will be built in stages with eight dishes and an 18-station array of antennas – each station featuring 512 antennas — ready by 2025. By the start of the following year SKA will include a 64-dish array and 64 antenna stations while in 2027 it will have a 133-dish array and 256 antenna stations.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:37:09
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778329
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


Dark Orange said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Not really.
Maybe = possible
Don’t know for sure = likely
Don’t know = we have no idea

And we’ve now had a maybe, don’t know, and no response.

Can we have a yes from someone?

See first response in the article (Anna Moore) for maybe = don’t know :)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:44:25
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778330
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

I also think it’s rather strange that all the responses seem to interpret current measurements as indicating that at least the local area is exactly flat, rather than that it has a curvature too small to be measured.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:49:23
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1778331
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

mollwollfumble said:


Off topic, but …

Still two and a half months to launch of the James Webb. “NASA now is targeting Oct. 31, 2021”. I can’t wait.
Not much James Webb Telescope news other than:

  • You can buy a Lego model.
  • It’s under threat from LGBT activists.

No, there is merely a campaign to have it renamed.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:55:03
From: sibeen
ID: 1778332
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Bubblecar said:


mollwollfumble said:

Off topic, but …

Still two and a half months to launch of the James Webb. “NASA now is targeting Oct. 31, 2021”. I can’t wait.
Not much James Webb Telescope news other than:

  • You can buy a Lego model.
  • It’s under threat from LGBT activists.

No, there is merely a campaign to have it renamed.

Why?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:55:58
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1778333
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


Bubblecar said:

Bubblecar said:

Proper link for the article Is Space Infinite? We Asked 5 Experts:

https://theconversation.com/is-space-infinite-we-asked-5-experts-165742

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Hard to say.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:57:44
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778334
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Peak Warming Man said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Bubblecar said:

That’s supposedly one maybe, two ayes and two nays, but actually at least three of those experts really said “we don’t know”, which is the correct answer.

Aren’t “maybe” and “don’t know” saying the same thing?

Hard to say.

Come on now.

Is that a “maybe” or a “don’t know”?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 09:57:44
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1778335
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

sibeen said:


Bubblecar said:

mollwollfumble said:

Off topic, but …

Still two and a half months to launch of the James Webb. “NASA now is targeting Oct. 31, 2021”. I can’t wait.
Not much James Webb Telescope news other than:

  • You can buy a Lego model.
  • It’s under threat from LGBT activists.

No, there is merely a campaign to have it renamed.

Why?

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02010-x

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 10:02:40
From: Michael V
ID: 1778337
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

sibeen said:


Bubblecar said:

mollwollfumble said:

Off topic, but …

Still two and a half months to launch of the James Webb. “NASA now is targeting Oct. 31, 2021”. I can’t wait.
Not much James Webb Telescope news other than:

  • You can buy a Lego model.
  • It’s under threat from LGBT activists.

No, there is merely a campaign to have it renamed.

Why?

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02010-x

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 10:07:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1778339
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Bubblecar said:

No, there is merely a campaign to have it renamed.

Why?

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02010-x

Ta.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 13:20:06
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778423
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Tau.Neutrino said:

What God, Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness Have in Common

“Theories that try to explain these big metaphysical mysteries fall short, making agnosticism the only sensible stance”

Sigh.

It does nothing of the sort.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 13:32:58
From: transition
ID: 1778431
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

What God, Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness Have in Common

“Theories that try to explain these big metaphysical mysteries fall short, making agnosticism the only sensible stance”

Sigh.

It does nothing of the sort.

read that, wasn’t too bad, no revelations in there

gravity’s still what it was yesterday, reliable, up is up, down is down

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 13:42:51
From: Ian
ID: 1778433
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

What God, Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness Have in Common

“Theories that try to explain these big metaphysical mysteries fall short, making agnosticism the only sensible stance”

Sigh.

It does nothing of the sort.

Probly meant to write “no religion”.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 13:57:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1778444
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

transition said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

What God, Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness Have in Common

“Theories that try to explain these big metaphysical mysteries fall short, making agnosticism the only sensible stance”

Sigh.

It does nothing of the sort.

read that, wasn’t too bad, no revelations in there

gravity’s still what it was yesterday, reliable, up is up, down is down

what about the apocalypse

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 14:11:15
From: transition
ID: 1778448
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

SCIENCE said:


transition said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

“Theories that try to explain these big metaphysical mysteries fall short, making agnosticism the only sensible stance”

Sigh.

It does nothing of the sort.

read that, wasn’t too bad, no revelations in there

gravity’s still what it was yesterday, reliable, up is up, down is down

what about the apocalypse

you ever considered, that if you took a random square centimetre of earth in front of you, make that a cubic centimetre, give it some volume yeah, how much you understand of that, really, and here we are contemplating the entire world, even the universe, what of the pretension of competencies to do that, the illusion and worse

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 14:19:45
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778449
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

transition said:


SCIENCE said:

transition said:

read that, wasn’t too bad, no revelations in there

gravity’s still what it was yesterday, reliable, up is up, down is down

what about the apocalypse

you ever considered, that if you took a random square centimetre of earth in front of you, make that a cubic centimetre, give it some volume yeah, how much you understand of that, really, and here we are contemplating the entire world, even the universe, what of the pretension of competencies to do that, the illusion and worse

But what of the people who thousands of years ago came up with some stories to explain the history and purpose of the universe, in every detail, and insisted that their followers accepted their words as the absolute truth.

What of the pretension of competencies in that?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 14:36:32
From: transition
ID: 1778453
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


transition said:

SCIENCE said:

what about the apocalypse

you ever considered, that if you took a random square centimetre of earth in front of you, make that a cubic centimetre, give it some volume yeah, how much you understand of that, really, and here we are contemplating the entire world, even the universe, what of the pretension of competencies to do that, the illusion and worse

But what of the people who thousands of years ago came up with some stories to explain the history and purpose of the universe, in every detail, and insisted that their followers accepted their words as the absolute truth.

What of the pretension of competencies in that?

i’d expect ever since you borrowed the alphabet and made it your own you’ve been in a way doing something similar

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 14:45:26
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778458
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

transition said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

transition said:

you ever considered, that if you took a random square centimetre of earth in front of you, make that a cubic centimetre, give it some volume yeah, how much you understand of that, really, and here we are contemplating the entire world, even the universe, what of the pretension of competencies to do that, the illusion and worse

But what of the people who thousands of years ago came up with some stories to explain the history and purpose of the universe, in every detail, and insisted that their followers accepted their words as the absolute truth.

What of the pretension of competencies in that?

i’d expect ever since you borrowed the alphabet and made it your own you’ve been in a way doing something similar

You would expect wrong then.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 15:32:45
From: Trevtaowillgetyounowhere
ID: 1778481
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

captain_spalding said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Ive seen the edge of rain while in a car, we drove up to it.

Ive seen the edge of rain moving towards me as a wall of water, while I was outside looking at the weather.

We had that in Bargara one time. At the end of our street, it was raining, and there was a very clear and definite boundary to it, which was not moving. It was a curtain of rain.

If you stood here, you were untouched, dry.Take three or four paces to over there and you’d get soaked.

Very odd.

I remember it raining on one side of the house and not the other here once.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 16:05:54
From: transition
ID: 1778497
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


transition said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

But what of the people who thousands of years ago came up with some stories to explain the history and purpose of the universe, in every detail, and insisted that their followers accepted their words as the absolute truth.

What of the pretension of competencies in that?

i’d expect ever since you borrowed the alphabet and made it your own you’ve been in a way doing something similar

You would expect wrong then.

I mean it could be said, might be true, that everyone inherits common word usage beginning with alphabet competency, of written English say, and from there on further inherits ideas, concepts, and ideology it could be argued

the alphabet doesn’t much come with an explanation of how you might escape it, its convergent tendencies

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 16:11:09
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778498
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

transition said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

transition said:

i’d expect ever since you borrowed the alphabet and made it your own you’ve been in a way doing something similar

You would expect wrong then.

I mean it could be said, might be true, that everyone inherits common word usage beginning with alphabet competency, of written English say, and from there on further inherits ideas, concepts, and ideology it could be argued

the alphabet doesn’t much come with an explanation of how you might escape it, its convergent tendencies

Certainly that might be said, and so far as I comprehend the meaning, I might even say that I agree.

On the face of it, what you say above seems pretty different to your previous statement. Perhaps not precisely diametrically opposite, but not far off.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 16:21:20
From: transition
ID: 1778500
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


transition said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

You would expect wrong then.

I mean it could be said, might be true, that everyone inherits common word usage beginning with alphabet competency, of written English say, and from there on further inherits ideas, concepts, and ideology it could be argued

the alphabet doesn’t much come with an explanation of how you might escape it, its convergent tendencies

Certainly that might be said, and so far as I comprehend the meaning, I might even say that I agree.

On the face of it, what you say above seems pretty different to your previous statement. Perhaps not precisely diametrically opposite, but not far off.

maybe, not, i’ll consult my neuron later after a coffee

I sort of turn off these days when things look to be going to religion bashing, i’m happy to take it for a philosophical walk though, torture it that way, explore the devious, and blinding, including of religion, but I don’t consider them so different, not the way I see it

godlessness has ideology also, often, those that reject religion often do, religion makes a neat dog to kick

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 16:23:59
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778503
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

transition said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

transition said:

I mean it could be said, might be true, that everyone inherits common word usage beginning with alphabet competency, of written English say, and from there on further inherits ideas, concepts, and ideology it could be argued

the alphabet doesn’t much come with an explanation of how you might escape it, its convergent tendencies

Certainly that might be said, and so far as I comprehend the meaning, I might even say that I agree.

On the face of it, what you say above seems pretty different to your previous statement. Perhaps not precisely diametrically opposite, but not far off.

maybe, not, i’ll consult my neuron later after a coffee

I sort of turn off these days when things look to be going to religion bashing, i’m happy to take it for a philosophical walk though, torture it that way, explore the devious, and blinding, including of religion, but I don’t consider them so different, not the way I see it

godlessness has ideology also, often, those that reject religion often do, religion makes a neat dog to kick

But strangely you are quite happy to go atheist bashing to your heart’s content.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 16:29:13
From: transition
ID: 1778507
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

The Rev Dodgson said:


transition said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Certainly that might be said, and so far as I comprehend the meaning, I might even say that I agree.

On the face of it, what you say above seems pretty different to your previous statement. Perhaps not precisely diametrically opposite, but not far off.

maybe, not, i’ll consult my neuron later after a coffee

I sort of turn off these days when things look to be going to religion bashing, i’m happy to take it for a philosophical walk though, torture it that way, explore the devious, and blinding, including of religion, but I don’t consider them so different, not the way I see it

godlessness has ideology also, often, those that reject religion often do, religion makes a neat dog to kick

But strangely you are quite happy to go atheist bashing to your heart’s content.

when did I ever, that was something worse than metaphysical exploration

i’d call myself an atheist, certainly the clicked the box indicating that on the census without hesitation

but I am every day, every moment, of the impression it’s possible not much is necessarily as it seems, a God could be many things, could be the whatever running this experiment in a lab

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 17:17:07
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1778546
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

transition said:

but I am every day, every moment, of the impression it’s possible not much is necessarily as it seems, a God could be many things, could be the whatever running this experiment in a lab

Yes, certainly that is possible.

But more than likely if such a being exists, it is more of a djinn than a god, and has a higher level god above it.

And in turn, that God Over Djinn, has a higher level GOD over it.

And so on.

Or maybe reality is just as it seems.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 17:17:43
From: Michael V
ID: 1778547
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

transition said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

transition said:

maybe, not, i’ll consult my neuron later after a coffee

I sort of turn off these days when things look to be going to religion bashing, i’m happy to take it for a philosophical walk though, torture it that way, explore the devious, and blinding, including of religion, but I don’t consider them so different, not the way I see it

godlessness has ideology also, often, those that reject religion often do, religion makes a neat dog to kick

But strangely you are quite happy to go atheist bashing to your heart’s content.

when did I ever, that was something worse than metaphysical exploration

i’d call myself an atheist, certainly the clicked the box indicating that on the census without hesitation

but I am every day, every moment, of the impression it’s possible not much is necessarily as it seems, a God could be many things, could be the whatever running this experiment in a lab

White mice!

Reply Quote

Date: 16/08/2021 19:19:38
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1778610
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

> What God, Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness Have in Common

None of them exists?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/08/2021 03:56:46
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1778704
Subject: re: Articles 16 Aug

Tau.Neutrino said:


What Is Conversational Intelligence and Why Does It Matter?
The Neurological Differences Between Psychopaths and Sociopaths
Check out these 10 science-fiction books for your summer reading
Matter From Light. Physicists Create Matter and Antimatter by Colliding Just Photons.
V404 Cygni: Huge Rings Around a Black Hole
Team find brain mechanism that automatically links objects in our minds
A holistic approach to materials for the next generation of electrical insulation
What God, Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness Have in Common
Why boiling droplets can race across hot oily surfaces
Deforestation leads to flight loss in New Zealand insects
Which way will paper maps go in the future? Cartographer says they’ll still be crucial, even with GPS
How do vaccinated people spread Delta? What the science says
Physicists Create a Bizarre ‘Wigner Crystal’ Made Purely of Electrons
What is static electricity? We may finally have an answer
The metaverse: From science fiction to virtual reality
Why Nikola Tesla was obsessed with the Egyptian pyramids
Beauty bias: hopefully the judge finds you attractive
Engineer Suspends Particles Using A Single Beam Of Light – Digg
Is space infinite? We asked 5 experts
A wonderful moment in the history of astronomy – the first capture of light emanating from a black hole
7 Pieces of Art Inspired by the Night Sky
Here’s Why Seeing The Edge Of Rain Is So Rare – Digg

> Physicists Create a Bizarre ‘Wigner Crystal’ Made Purely of Electrons

Great article, thanks.

“a crystal made from electrons”

Wow. I’ve been wondering recently what the densest packing of pure electrons is. Looks like we might have an answer here.

“To make electrons form a Wigner crystal, it might seem that a physicist would simply have to cool them down. Electrons repel one another, and so cooling would decrease their energy and freeze them into a lattice just as water turns to ice. … What should be a crystal turns into something more like a puddle”.

“found a Wigner crystal almost by accident. Researchers were experimenting with electron behavior in a “sandwich” of exceptionally thin sheets of a semiconductor separated by a material that electrons could not move through. The physicists cooled this semiconductor sandwich to below −230 degrees Celsius and played around with the number of electrons in each of the layers. They observed that when there was a specific number of electrons in each layer, they all stood mysteriously still. Somehow, electrons inside the semiconductors could not move. This was a really surprising find”

It sure is surprising. But what’s the density?

Reply Quote