Date: 20/01/2022 15:30:06
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1838529
Subject: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

Something else for you to think about.

>>Chemical pollutants, including plastics, can impact the Earth in all kinds of ways. Manufacturing of these “novel entities” has grown so rapidly that governments are now unable to assess, let alone control the risks to Earth’s ecosystems, new research has found, taking us beyond a safe “planetary boundary” and endangering the planet’s stability.

Led by scientists at the Stockholm Research Centre, the study takes stock of the rate manufactured chemicals are entering the environment, and is claimed to be the first to asses the impact on the stability of the Earth system. There are around 350,000 of these “novel entities,” on the global market, according to the researchers, including plastics, pesticides, industrial chemicals, chemicals in consumer products, pharmaceuticals and antibiotics, much of which make their way into the environment.

“There has been a 50-fold increase in the production of chemicals since 1950. This is projected to triple again by 2050,” said co-author Patricia Villarubia-Gómez from the Stockholm Resilience Centre.

The scientists looked at this problem through the framework of what they called planetary boundaries, which represent the stable state Earth has existed in for 10,000 years. These boundaries include safe limits for greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, freshwater and other environmental factors that can impact the stability of the planet. The new study explores the boundary for novel entities and examines the many ways they can impact the planet’s health, through mining, fracking, and waste management, for example.

“The pace that societies are producing and releasing new chemicals and other novel entities into the environment is not consistent with staying within a safe operating space for humanity,” said Villarubia-Gómez.

Plastics are of particular concern, with the material containing more than 10,000 chemicals and therefore introducing all manner of new hazards to the environment. Studies have shown plastic to be present in the world’s most remote environments, including the Arctic, Antarctic and high on Mt Everest. Further, they have shown how plastics can impact living marine organisms and even have toxic effects on human cells.

According to the team, plastic production increased by 79 percent between 2000 and 2015, and the total mass of plastics on Earth is more than twice the mass of all living mammals. Around 80 percent of plastics ever produced still persist in the environment, with production and subsequent pollution only expected to continue to increase.

The scientists say that together these trends on chemical production and pollution are endangering the Earth system, and steps should be taken to stem the flow.

“We need to be working towards implementing a fixed cap on chemical production and release,” said Carney Almroth.

“And shifting to a circular economy is really important,” added Sarah Cornell from the Stockholm Resilience Centre. “That means changing materials and products so they can be reused not wasted, designing chemicals and products for recycling, and much better screening of chemicals for their safety and sustainability along their whole impact pathway in the Earth system,”

The research was published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

https://newatlas.com/environment/chemical-pollution-safe-boundary-planet-study/

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 20:27:48
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1838617
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

> That means changing materials and products so they can be reused not wasted, designing chemicals and products for recycling

We do that. That’s why we have plastics.

(Runs away)

A bit more seriously, lumping all these different molecules together as “plastics” is pretty ridiculous. Just as “oils ain’t oils”, so “plastics aint plastics”.

For starters, there is a huge difference betwen chlorinated plastics (PVC etc.), large monomer non-chlorinated plastics and small monomer non-chlorinated plastics when it comes to the environmental effects. Ditto those plastics loaded with additives such as UV stabilisers. Ditto foams vs rigid plastics vs flexible sheets. Lumping them all under the name “plastics” gives a totally wrong impression of environmental impact.

There’s more difference between different types of plastics than there is between some plastics and wood. Both are just as edible and just as good/bad for you.

My other beef is the greenwashing I object to. They advertise it as “bamboo” when it’s really “rayon”, a totally artificial fiber.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 20:52:21
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1838620
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

mollwollfumble said:


> That means changing materials and products so they can be reused not wasted, designing chemicals and products for recycling

We do that. That’s why we have plastics.

(Runs away)

A bit more seriously, lumping all these different molecules together as “plastics” is pretty ridiculous. Just as “oils ain’t oils”, so “plastics aint plastics”.

For starters, there is a huge difference betwen chlorinated plastics (PVC etc.), large monomer non-chlorinated plastics and small monomer non-chlorinated plastics when it comes to the environmental effects. Ditto those plastics loaded with additives such as UV stabilisers. Ditto foams vs rigid plastics vs flexible sheets. Lumping them all under the name “plastics” gives a totally wrong impression of environmental impact.

There’s more difference between different types of plastics than there is between some plastics and wood. Both are just as edible and just as good/bad for you.

My other beef is the greenwashing I object to. They advertise it as “bamboo” when it’s really “rayon”, a totally artificial fiber.

From the article:

>>Chemical pollutants, including plastics, can impact the Earth in all kinds of ways.<<

>>Plastics are of particular concern, with the material containing more than 10,000 chemicals and therefore introducing all manner of new hazards to the environment. Studies have shown plastic to be present in the world’s most remote environments, including the Arctic, Antarctic and high on Mt Everest. Further, they have shown how plastics can impact living marine organisms and even have toxic effects on human cells.

According to the team, plastic production increased by 79 percent between 2000 and 2015, and the total mass of plastics on Earth is more than twice the mass of all living mammals. Around 80 percent of plastics ever produced still persist in the environment, with production and subsequent pollution only expected to continue to increase.

The scientists say that together these trends on chemical production and pollution are endangering the Earth system, and steps should be taken to stem the flow.<<

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 07:54:29
From: roughbarked
ID: 1838743
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

So why has it taken this long and indeed why wasn’t this considered before these things were produced in the first place?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 09:27:31
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1838754
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

roughbarked said:


So why has it taken this long and indeed why wasn’t this considered before these things were produced in the first place?

The same reason lead was put in petrol and ozone destroying gasses were used in refrigerators.

There are no political or economic systems that take adequate account of future costs and future risks.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 09:31:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 1838755
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

So why has it taken this long and indeed why wasn’t this considered before these things were produced in the first place?

The same reason lead was put in petrol and ozone destroying gasses were used in refrigerators.

There are no political or economic systems that take adequate account of future costs and future risks.

Rather, consumers aren’t given much in the way of choice.
Though it is true that I don’t collect Lego and do collect plants insects and other animalia.
Also restrict my use of lawnmowers etc. ;)
https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2022-01-20/air-pollution-pollination-flowers-crops/100764594

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 09:36:11
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1838757
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

roughbarked said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

roughbarked said:

So why has it taken this long and indeed why wasn’t this considered before these things were produced in the first place?

The same reason lead was put in petrol and ozone destroying gasses were used in refrigerators.

There are no political or economic systems that take adequate account of future costs and future risks.

Rather, consumers aren’t given much in the way of choice.
Though it is true that I don’t collect Lego and do collect plants insects and other animalia.
Also restrict my use of lawnmowers etc. ;)
https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2022-01-20/air-pollution-pollination-flowers-crops/100764594

Sure, they are. But if a product is much cheaper than more sustainable alternatives, almost everyone will go for the cheap one, especially if almost everyone else does as well.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 09:56:54
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1838759
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

Morning pilgrims, it’s cool for this time of year in Brissy.
Speaking of heat I was listening to the BBC and they were interviewing a crazy American woman scientist about the bluebottle story from Australia and she was telling the world how it was all to do with climate change because of the massive heat waves Australia was having on the East coast this year.
I flicked her off and went over to another station.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 10:02:24
From: Ian
ID: 1838761
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

PermeateFree said:


Something else for you to think about.

>>Chemical pollutants, including plastics, can impact the Earth in all kinds of ways. Manufacturing of these “novel entities” has grown so rapidly that governments are now unable to assess, let alone control the risks to Earth’s ecosystems, new research has found, taking us beyond a safe “planetary boundary” and endangering the planet’s stability.

Led by scientists at the Stockholm Research Centre, the study takes stock of the rate manufactured chemicals are entering the environment, and is claimed to be the first to asses the impact on the stability of the Earth system. There are around 350,000 of these “novel entities,” on the global market, according to the researchers, including plastics, pesticides, industrial chemicals, chemicals in consumer products, pharmaceuticals and antibiotics, much of which make their way into the environment.

I read this book by Ben Elton about 30 years ago.. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_

I didn’t think that combining environmental activism and comedy worked particularly well, but the main theme is built around of concept of TTO, Total Toxic Overload…

“The Stark conspiracy is a cabal of the world’s richest and most influential men, who have long been aware that the planet’s ecosystem is approaching total collapse. For decades, they have been launching unmanned spacecraft loaded with supplies into orbit around the Earth and the Moon. Seeking to save their own lives and leave everyone else to suffer from ‘total toxic overload’, they secretly build a fleet of spacecraft with the intention of colonising the Moon.”

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 10:19:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 1838764
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

Ian said:


PermeateFree said:

Something else for you to think about.

>>Chemical pollutants, including plastics, can impact the Earth in all kinds of ways. Manufacturing of these “novel entities” has grown so rapidly that governments are now unable to assess, let alone control the risks to Earth’s ecosystems, new research has found, taking us beyond a safe “planetary boundary” and endangering the planet’s stability.

Led by scientists at the Stockholm Research Centre, the study takes stock of the rate manufactured chemicals are entering the environment, and is claimed to be the first to asses the impact on the stability of the Earth system. There are around 350,000 of these “novel entities,” on the global market, according to the researchers, including plastics, pesticides, industrial chemicals, chemicals in consumer products, pharmaceuticals and antibiotics, much of which make their way into the environment.

I read this book by Ben Elton about 30 years ago.. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_

I didn’t think that combining environmental activism and comedy worked particularly well, but the main theme is built around of concept of TTO, Total Toxic Overload…

“The Stark conspiracy is a cabal of the world’s richest and most influential men, who have long been aware that the planet’s ecosystem is approaching total collapse. For decades, they have been launching unmanned spacecraft loaded with supplies into orbit around the Earth and the Moon. Seeking to save their own lives and leave everyone else to suffer from ‘total toxic overload’, they secretly build a fleet of spacecraft with the intention of colonising the Moon.”

I might read it again. Haven’t read it for a good while… must be at least 30 years ..

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 11:26:06
From: Michael V
ID: 1838801
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

:(

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-21/calls-for-wessel-islands-clean-up-northern-territory/100769572

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 11:33:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 1838806
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

Michael V said:

:(

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-21/calls-for-wessel-islands-clean-up-northern-territory/100769572

Yeah.:(

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 11:35:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 1838807
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

roughbarked said:


Michael V said:
:(

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-21/calls-for-wessel-islands-clean-up-northern-territory/100769572

Yeah.:(

What we need is to build a wall to keep the stuff out.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 11:41:46
From: Michael V
ID: 1838812
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

roughbarked said:


roughbarked said:

Michael V said:
:(

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-21/calls-for-wessel-islands-clean-up-northern-territory/100769572

Yeah.:(

What we need is to build a wall to keep the stuff out.

Oh, goody. The Trump solution.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 11:42:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 1838813
Subject: re: Study finds chemical pollution is now beyond safe boundary for the planet

Michael V said:


roughbarked said:

roughbarked said:

Yeah.:(

What we need is to build a wall to keep the stuff out.

Oh, goody. The Trump solution.

I was attempting brevity but I do wonder how much of this does float over from Indonesia.

Reply Quote