Date: 20/01/2022 17:13:26
From: sibeen
ID: 1838566
Subject: Women's Ashes

Game 1 is on tonight, a T20 starting at 7 pm EDST.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 17:14:36
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1838567
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Game 1 is on tonight, a T20 starting at 7 pm EDST.

Let’s hope the language will be a little more genteel for this series.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 17:16:32
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1838569
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

6:00 PM Queensland International Standard Proper Time.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 17:16:50
From: Arts
ID: 1838571
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Game 1 is on tonight, a T20 starting at 7 pm EDST.

Let’s hope the language will be a little more genteel for this series.

I should hope not

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 17:17:22
From: sibeen
ID: 1838572
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Game 1 is on tonight, a T20 starting at 7 pm EDST.

Let’s hope the language will be a little more genteel for this series.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 17:18:10
From: furious
ID: 1838574
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Ashes? A T20? It’s just not cricket…

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 17:18:50
From: Tamb
ID: 1838576
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


6:00 PM Queensland International Standard Proper Time.

Perzakly mr PWM.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 17:21:05
From: Tamb
ID: 1838579
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

furious said:


Ashes? A T20? It’s just not cricket…

3 x T20. 1× 4 day Test. 3 x ODI.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 17:22:45
From: Michael V
ID: 1838581
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Beth Mooney’s out with a broken jaw.

Grace Harris is the replacement. She can be quite entertaining both with the bat and on the microphone.

Are they going to play Elise Perry? (Last I read, they hadn’t decided. I hope they do.)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 18:04:04
From: Ian
ID: 1838593
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

furious said:


Ashes? A T20? It’s just not cricket…

^^^

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 18:44:46
From: sibeen
ID: 1838602
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Australia won the toss and is going to bowl.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 18:45:10
From: sibeen
ID: 1838603
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Ellyse Perry has been left out.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 18:50:56
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1838605
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Ellyse Perry has been left out.

Maybe she made too many enemies.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 19:38:25
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1838613
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

We could do with a wicket or two.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 19:46:56
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1838614
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

I say we could do with a wicket or two.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 20:34:42
From: Kingy
ID: 1838618
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Game 1 is on tonight, a T20 starting at 7 pm EDST.

Let’s hope the language will be a little more genteel for this series.

Women’s Ashes sledging:

Your Soufflés don’t rise, and taste floury!

Yeah? Well, your husband isn’t down the pub, he’s at Wendy’s place, checking out her “hedge”!

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 21:29:40
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1838635
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Kingy said:


Bubblecar said:

sibeen said:

Game 1 is on tonight, a T20 starting at 7 pm EDST.

Let’s hope the language will be a little more genteel for this series.

Women’s Ashes sledging:

Your Soufflés don’t rise, and taste floury!

Yeah? Well, your husband isn’t down the pub, he’s at Wendy’s place, checking out her “hedge”!

Are Women’s Ashes what you get from a Ladies Powder Room?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 21:50:08
From: dv
ID: 1838643
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Wah, not on 7plus

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 21:51:44
From: sibeen
ID: 1838644
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Aus 1/110. Eng were 1/92 at the same position.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 21:52:56
From: sibeen
ID: 1838646
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Aus 1/110. Eng were 1/92 at the same position.

That’s the end of the 12th over. Oz need 58 off the next 8 overs. Should shit it in.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 21:53:03
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1838647
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Aus 1/110. Eng were 1/92 at the same position.

Can you tell just by looking at them, which are the Australians and which are the English?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 21:53:58
From: sibeen
ID: 1838649
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Aus 1/110. Eng were 1/92 at the same position.

Can you tell just by looking at them, which are the Australians and which are the English?

Of course.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 21:55:59
From: party_pants
ID: 1838651
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Aus 1/110. Eng were 1/92 at the same position.

Can you tell just by looking at them, which are the Australians and which are the English?

The poms are in red,white and blue; the Aussies in green and yellow.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 21:57:27
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1838654
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


Bubblecar said:

sibeen said:

Aus 1/110. Eng were 1/92 at the same position.

Can you tell just by looking at them, which are the Australians and which are the English?

The poms are in red,white and blue; the Aussies in green and yellow.

I was meaning more just by their facial characteristics.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 21:59:09
From: party_pants
ID: 1838656
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bubblecar said:


party_pants said:

Bubblecar said:

Can you tell just by looking at them, which are the Australians and which are the English?

The poms are in red,white and blue; the Aussies in green and yellow.

I was meaning more just by their facial characteristics.

No, not really.

But even then one side is batting and one is fielding – so it is pretty easy to tell who is who if you can see the scoreboard.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 22:08:02
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1838663
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Re: The Ashes.

From a TV cartoon I saw about a week ago.

Person 1 “That urn contains my father’s ashes.”
Person 2 “Sorry, I didn’t know he was cremated.”
Person 1 “He wasn’t. He was a big smoker. His body was never recovered.”

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 22:09:37
From: dv
ID: 1838665
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


Bubblecar said:

party_pants said:

The poms are in red,white and blue; the Aussies in green and yellow.

I was meaning more just by their facial characteristics.

No, not really.

But even then one side is batting and one is fielding – so it is pretty easy to tell who is who if you can see the scoreboard.

The Aussies are smiling more

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 22:10:44
From: party_pants
ID: 1838666
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


party_pants said:

Bubblecar said:

I was meaning more just by their facial characteristics.

No, not really.

But even then one side is batting and one is fielding – so it is pretty easy to tell who is who if you can see the scoreboard.

The Aussies are smiling more

Aus need 17 off 25 balls remaining, with 9 wickets on hand :)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 22:11:10
From: sibeen
ID: 1838667
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


party_pants said:

Bubblecar said:

I was meaning more just by their facial characteristics.

No, not really.

But even then one side is batting and one is fielding – so it is pretty easy to tell who is who if you can see the scoreboard.

The Aussies are smiling more

Our Prime Minister is better than their Prime Minister, and it comes out in our sunny disposition.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 22:12:59
From: party_pants
ID: 1838668
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


dv said:

party_pants said:

No, not really.

But even then one side is batting and one is fielding – so it is pretty easy to tell who is who if you can see the scoreboard.

The Aussies are smiling more

Our Prime Minister is better than their Prime Minister, and it comes out in our sunny disposition.

wait… what?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 22:15:05
From: sibeen
ID: 1838669
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Oz wins by 9 wickets.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 22:15:20
From: dv
ID: 1838670
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

dv said:

The Aussies are smiling more

Our Prime Minister is better than their Prime Minister, and it comes out in our sunny disposition.

wait… what?

I’ll give him that

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 22:15:33
From: party_pants
ID: 1838671
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Aus win by 9 wickets with 3 overs to spare.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/01/2022 22:16:12
From: sibeen
ID: 1838672
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

dv said:

The Aussies are smiling more

Our Prime Minister is better than their Prime Minister, and it comes out in our sunny disposition.

wait… what?

I suspect Scotty will be around a bit longer than Boris. Not by much, hopefully, but longer.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 08:34:52
From: roughbarked
ID: 1838745
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bubblecar said:

Can you tell just by looking at them, which are the Australians and which are the English?

The poms don’t have a suntan.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/01/2022 08:36:30
From: Tamb
ID: 1838746
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

roughbarked said:


Bubblecar said:

Can you tell just by looking at them, which are the Australians and which are the English?

The poms don’t have a suntan.

And they look miserable.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 15:19:06
From: Michael V
ID: 1839314
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Game 2: rain-delayed.

Playing now – a shortened match of 14 overs apiece.

Raining again.

:(

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 15:34:43
From: sibeen
ID: 1839322
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Thanks for the heads up, mv.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 16:07:55
From: sibeen
ID: 1839329
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 16:10:03
From: party_pants
ID: 1839330
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

Shoulda played it in Melbourne with the roof closed.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 16:10:35
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1839332
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

What’s the breakdown of points available T20s Test One dayers?

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 16:10:37
From: Michael V
ID: 1839333
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

Ha!

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 16:14:08
From: Tamb
ID: 1839336
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

A point.
Score now is Au 3 En 1

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 16:16:23
From: Tamb
ID: 1839338
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


sibeen said:

Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

What’s the breakdown of points available T20s Test One dayers?

3 ×2 T20 1×4 Test(4 day match) 3 × 2 ODI
Total 16

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 16:20:11
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1839340
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Tamb said:


Peak Warming Man said:

sibeen said:

Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

What’s the breakdown of points available T20s Test One dayers?

3 ×2 T20 1×4 Test(4 day match) 3 × 2 ODI
Total 16

Ta.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 16:20:20
From: party_pants
ID: 1839341
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


sibeen said:

Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

What’s the breakdown of points available T20s Test One dayers?

T20 and ODI are worth 2 points, winner gets 2 points, or 1 point each on the event of a tie or no-result. Test match is worth 4 points, or 2 in the event of a draw, tie or no-result.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/01/2022 16:20:31
From: sibeen
ID: 1839342
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


Tamb said:

Peak Warming Man said:

What’s the breakdown of points available T20s Test One dayers?

3 ×2 T20 1×4 Test(4 day match) 3 × 2 ODI
Total 16

Ta.

No worries.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/01/2022 14:33:48
From: Michael V
ID: 1839670
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Start delayed: rain. It doesn’t look hopeful, judging by the radar.

:(

http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDR643.loop.shtml

Reply Quote

Date: 23/01/2022 14:37:26
From: roughbarked
ID: 1839672
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Start delayed: rain. It doesn’t look hopeful, judging by the radar.

:(

http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDR643.loop.shtml


I’m afraid there will be no cricket until Wednesday if that. Probably none.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/01/2022 15:35:28
From: dv
ID: 1839693
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Stupid Adelaide

Reply Quote

Date: 23/01/2022 15:40:00
From: sibeen
ID: 1839694
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

Game 3 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets another point :)

Reply Quote

Date: 23/01/2022 15:44:56
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1839695
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


sibeen said:

Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

Game 3 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets another point :)

So Aust. only needs another 2 points to retain the Ashes.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/01/2022 15:46:00
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1839696
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


sibeen said:

sibeen said:

Game 2 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets some points :)

Game 3 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets another point :)

So Aust. only needs another 2 points to retain the Ashes.

3 points.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/01/2022 16:07:28
From: Tamb
ID: 1839701
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


Peak Warming Man said:

sibeen said:

Game 3 has been abandoned.

On the bright side England gets another point :)

So Aust. only needs another 2 points to retain the Ashes.

3 points.


I thought we had 3 & needed 8

Reply Quote

Date: 23/01/2022 16:13:36
From: Tamb
ID: 1839704
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Tamb said:


Peak Warming Man said:

Peak Warming Man said:

So Aust. only needs another 2 points to retain the Ashes.

3 points.


I thought we had 3 & needed 8


Oops. We have 4 so need 4 more.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2022 21:37:51
From: dv
ID: 1840991
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Likely to lose a day and a half to rain in the Test

Reply Quote

Date: 26/01/2022 21:39:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 1840992
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


Likely to lose a day and a half to rain in the Test

Maybe more.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 10:03:20
From: Michael V
ID: 1841067
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

The Test starts. England is bowling.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 10:13:40
From: Michael V
ID: 1841068
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Healy out for a duck.

Aus: 1/1

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 10:17:24
From: Michael V
ID: 1841069
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Mooney gone for 3.

Aus: 2/4

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 11:09:53
From: sibeen
ID: 1841081
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 11:11:03
From: Michael V
ID: 1841083
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Perry gone for 18.

Aus: 3/43

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 12:03:37
From: Michael V
ID: 1841114
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Luncheon.

Aus: 3/79

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 12:10:57
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1841118
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Luncheon.

Aus: 3/79

They’re probably having luncheon meat sandwiches.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 14:42:55
From: sibeen
ID: 1841141
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

No fucks were given during that session.

At tea: 3/199.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 15:26:11
From: sibeen
ID: 1841150
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 15:27:30
From: sibeen
ID: 1841151
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 15:30:41
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1841153
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


FUCK

Ah, the Lenny Bruce school of comedy.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 16:56:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1841176
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 17:30:52
From: sibeen
ID: 1841189
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 17:31:22
From: sibeen
ID: 1841190
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


FUCK

Final ball of the day.

Oz 7/327.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 21:39:35
From: dv
ID: 1841281
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

The English team managed to get through 97 overs.

Maybe they could have some training sessions with the lads.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/01/2022 23:25:54
From: Michael V
ID: 1841318
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


The English team managed to get through 97 overs.

Maybe they could have some training sessions with the lads.

LOL.

Fair call.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:14:10
From: Michael V
ID: 1841437
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Sutherland bowled for 8 runs.

Aus: 8/328

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:15:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 1841440
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Sutherland bowled for 8 runs.

Aus: 8/328

Game on.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:18:01
From: sibeen
ID: 1841442
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bugger, I thought it as a 10:30 start and wasn’t paying attention.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:29:23
From: sibeen
ID: 1841447
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:29:56
From: Michael V
ID: 1841449
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Bugger, I thought it as a 10:30 start and wasn’t paying attention.

Ha!

Jonassen gone for 2

AUS declared: 9/337

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:30:11
From: sibeen
ID: 1841450
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

And a declaration to boot. 9/337.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:33:01
From: Tamb
ID: 1841453
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


And a declaration to boot. 9/337.

Declaration. Good mind games.
Might go & watch the match for a while.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:34:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 1841455
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Tamb said:


sibeen said:

And a declaration to boot. 9/337.

Declaration. Good mind games.
Might go & watch the match for a while.

As I said.. Game on.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:47:30
From: sibeen
ID: 1841464
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 10:47:45
From: Michael V
ID: 1841465
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Winfield-Hill gone for 4

ENG 1/6

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 11:30:48
From: sibeen
ID: 1841500
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 11:31:05
From: Michael V
ID: 1841501
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Beaumont gone for 5.

ENG: 2/23

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 11:33:29
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1841504
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Beaumont gone for 5.

ENG: 2/23

Donald Bradman :

When you play test cricket, you don’t give the English(wo)men an inch. Play it tough, all the way. Grind them into the dust. …

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 11:37:54
From: sibeen
ID: 1841505
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Commentary will be interrupted whilst I go do a site visit.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 11:39:04
From: Michael V
ID: 1841506
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Commentary will be interrupted whilst I go do a site visit.

FUCK

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 11:39:42
From: party_pants
ID: 1841507
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


Commentary will be interrupted whilst I go do a site visit.

no way!

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 11:39:47
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1841508
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

captain_spalding said:


Michael V said:

Beaumont gone for 5.

ENG: 2/23

Donald Bradman :

When you play test cricket, you don’t give the English(wo)men an inch. Play it tough, all the way. Grind them into the dust. …

Was Bradman inclined to give cricketers from other countries an inch then?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 11:48:21
From: party_pants
ID: 1841509
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

The Rev Dodgson said:


captain_spalding said:

Michael V said:

Beaumont gone for 5.

ENG: 2/23

Donald Bradman :

When you play test cricket, you don’t give the English(wo)men an inch. Play it tough, all the way. Grind them into the dust. …

Was Bradman inclined to give cricketers from other countries an inch then?

He played over half his test cricket against England. He played 1 series each against West Indies ans South Africa before WW2, and 1 series against India after the war. He scored 4 double-centuries and 4 (single) centuries in those 3 series (15 matches). So I guess he did not go easy on them either.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 11:50:41
From: party_pants
ID: 1841510
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

captain_spalding said:

Donald Bradman :

When you play test cricket, you don’t give the English(wo)men an inch. Play it tough, all the way. Grind them into the dust. …

Was Bradman inclined to give cricketers from other countries an inch then?

He played over half his test cricket against England. He played 1 series each against West Indies ans South Africa before WW2, and 1 series against India after the war. He scored 4 double-centuries and 4 (single) centuries in those 3 series (15 matches). So I guess he did not go easy on them either.

I mistaked. Make that 6 single centuries – I counted only the first innings scores.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 12:01:25
From: Michael V
ID: 1841515
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Luncheon.

ENG: 3/38

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 12:59:44
From: sibeen
ID: 1841533
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 13:43:10
From: sibeen
ID: 1841552
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


FUCK OFF

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 13:43:11
From: Michael V
ID: 1841553
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Dunkley gone for 13.

ENG: 4/79

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 14:25:57
From: sibeen
ID: 1841571
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 14:38:31
From: sibeen
ID: 1841575
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 15:44:26
From: sibeen
ID: 1841601
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 16:06:52
From: sibeen
ID: 1841607
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 28/01/2022 16:30:00
From: Michael V
ID: 1841611
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Heather Knight gets a Ton!

Good on her.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 10:03:13
From: Michael V
ID: 1841880
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Play has resumed, Day 3.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 10:48:42
From: Michael V
ID: 1841904
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Heather Knight (ENG) has 150.

Good on her!

ENG: 8/267, trailing AUS by 70 runs.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 10:51:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 1841908
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Heather Knight (ENG) has 150.

Good on her!

ENG: 8/267, trailing AUS by 70 runs.

Well done, Heather.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 10:55:10
From: Michael V
ID: 1841909
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Ecclestone gone for 34.

ENG: 9/269

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 10:56:46
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1841911
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Heather Knight (ENG) has 150.

Good on her!

ENG: 8/267, trailing AUS by 70 runs.

I’ve always liked Heathers, they are not good looking or raunchy like say Vickeys or Pennys but they are all business and get the job done.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:02:12
From: dv
ID: 1841912
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Looking at the weather forecast there might only be about 80 overs or so left available for play in the remainder of the match so it will be interesting to see whether the Australians aggressively pursue the victory

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:03:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 1841915
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


Michael V said:

Heather Knight (ENG) has 150.

Good on her!

ENG: 8/267, trailing AUS by 70 runs.

I’ve always liked Heathers, they are not good looking or raunchy like say Vickeys or Pennys but they are all business and get the job done.

True. Hardy.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:10:22
From: dv
ID: 1841916
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

I think HK has a pretty good shot of being on this list, she’s currently got about 58% of this innings…

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:11:18
From: dv
ID: 1841917
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Could be a chess joke about knight facing king but I’ll let PWM sort out the details

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:24:26
From: sibeen
ID: 1841924
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:25:18
From: sibeen
ID: 1841925
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

All out 297. Heather Knight 168 not out.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:25:38
From: Michael V
ID: 1841927
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

England all out for 297 Trail Australia by 40.

Heather Knight got her highest ever test score; 168 not out.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:27:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 1841929
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


England all out for 297 Trail Australia by 40.

Heather Knight got her highest ever test score; 168 not out.

Applauds her knock.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:32:12
From: party_pants
ID: 1841933
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


All out 297. Heather Knight 168 not out.

Well done Heather.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:36:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 1841937
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


Could be a chess joke about knight facing king but I’ll let PWM sort out the details

They do say that cricket is the chess of sports.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:37:39
From: sibeen
ID: 1841940
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:38:11
From: Michael V
ID: 1841941
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Healy gone for a duck.

AUS: 1/1

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:38:25
From: roughbarked
ID: 1841942
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


FUCK

A pair of ducks. She might start breeding them?

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:38:42
From: Michael V
ID: 1841943
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Healy gone for a duck.

AUS: 1/1

And she’s on a pair.

:(

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:45:42
From: party_pants
ID: 1841948
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

roughbarked said:


dv said:

Could be a chess joke about knight facing king but I’ll let PWM sort out the details

They do say that cricket is the chess of sports.

Nah, there’s chess-boxing.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:55:25
From: Michael V
ID: 1841953
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Oh, dear.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:55:45
From: sibeen
ID: 1841954
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:56:05
From: Michael V
ID: 1841957
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Haynes gone for 4.

AUS: 2/12.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/01/2022 11:57:44
From: Michael V
ID: 1841959
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Rain delay…

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 10:00:16
From: Michael V
ID: 1842290
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Play has resumed early, Day 4.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 11:31:21
From: sibeen
ID: 1842318
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 11:31:54
From: Michael V
ID: 1842319
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Perry gone for 41.

AUS: 3/103, lead by143:

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:00:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 1842326
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Perry gone for 41.

AUS: 3/103, lead by143:

Plenty of depth yet.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:01:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 1842327
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


FUCK

Oh dear.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:02:31
From: Michael V
ID: 1842328
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Mooney gone for 63.

AUS: 4/123, lead by: 163

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:02:59
From: sibeen
ID: 1842330
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:03:28
From: Michael V
ID: 1842331
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Luncheon.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:04:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 1842332
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Luncheon.

Thank the good lord.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:51:55
From: Michael V
ID: 1842352
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Lanning gone for 12.

AUS: 5/130, lead by: 170

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:52:43
From: party_pants
ID: 1842353
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Lanning gone for 12.

AUS: 5/130, lead by: 170

get the feeling that is not quite enough.

Is rain due?

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:55:03
From: sibeen
ID: 1842356
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


Michael V said:

Lanning gone for 12.

AUS: 5/130, lead by: 170

get the feeling that is not quite enough.

Is rain due?

It’s only a four day game.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 12:59:47
From: Michael V
ID: 1842360
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


Michael V said:

Lanning gone for 12.

AUS: 5/130, lead by: 170

get the feeling that is not quite enough.

Is rain due?

Not for a while, judging by the radar.

http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDR402.loop.shtml

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 13:39:21
From: Michael V
ID: 1842369
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Gardner gone for 38.

AUS: 6/178, lead by: 218

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 13:45:48
From: sibeen
ID: 1842371
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 14:01:42
From: sibeen
ID: 1842377
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 14:01:57
From: Michael V
ID: 1842378
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

McGrath gone for 34.

AUS: 7/199, lead by: 239

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 14:08:59
From: sibeen
ID: 1842380
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Declaration. 256 in front.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 14:09:21
From: Michael V
ID: 1842381
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

AUS declared 7/216. Target for ENG is 257.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 14:19:51
From: dv
ID: 1842388
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Interesting dec. Does give England a shot.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 14:26:41
From: Michael V
ID: 1842392
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


Interesting dec. Does give England a shot.

They’ll have to go for it.

Hopefully ENG won’t give up and just play for a draw.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 14:29:04
From: Tamb
ID: 1842395
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


dv said:

Interesting dec. Does give England a shot.

They’ll have to go for it.

Hopefully ENG won’t give up and just play for a draw.


A draw would mean Eng would have to win all 3 ODIs

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 15:30:00
From: Michael V
ID: 1842409
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Beaumont gone for 36.

ENG 1/52

Runs still required: 205.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:02:13
From: Michael V
ID: 1842412
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Winfield-Hill gone for 34.

ENG 2/94

Target: 257.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:02:18
From: sibeen
ID: 1842413
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:22:06
From: dv
ID: 1842416
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Since the extinction of the South Carolina parakeet, the only remaining parrot native to the territory of the US is the green parakeet.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:23:33
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1842417
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


Since the extinction of the South Carolina parakeet, the only remaining parrot native to the territory of the US is the green parakeet.

are they any good with a bat though?

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:28:49
From: Michael V
ID: 1842419
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

ChrispenEvan said:


dv said:

Since the extinction of the South Carolina parakeet, the only remaining parrot native to the territory of the US is the green parakeet.

are they any good with a bat though?

The Chinese are.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:42:31
From: dv
ID: 1842422
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Got to tip the lid for both teams going for a result: a sporting declaration by the Australians and a genuine chase by the English.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:45:59
From: sibeen
ID: 1842426
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

100 to get and 16 overs.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:46:33
From: Michael V
ID: 1842427
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


Got to tip the lid for both teams going for a result: a sporting declaration by the Australians and a genuine chase by the English.

Just 99 to go for England.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:51:57
From: Michael V
ID: 1842431
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Knight gone for 48.

ENG: 3/166

Target: 257.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:52:23
From: sibeen
ID: 1842432
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 16:55:45
From: Michael V
ID: 1842434
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bugger. Dunkley gets a life.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:10:32
From: sibeen
ID: 1842441
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

JAYSUS

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:11:11
From: Michael V
ID: 1842442
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Bugger. Dunkley gets a life.

And it has become costly. Fours aplenty and back-to-back sixes.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:17:54
From: party_pants
ID: 1842445
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


Got to tip the lid for both teams going for a result: a sporting declaration by the Australians and a genuine chase by the English.

Bad mistake. Never make a sporting declaration in a two team series. Sporting declarations are only for multiple team competitions where teams are fighting over spots on the league table to make the final.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:25:54
From: Michael V
ID: 1842448
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

My fingernails are reducing…

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:28:17
From: sibeen
ID: 1842450
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:28:22
From: Michael V
ID: 1842451
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Sciver gone for 58.

ENG: 4/218

Target: 257.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:39:33
From: Michael V
ID: 1842455
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Jones gone.

ENG: 5/224

Target: 257.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:39:40
From: sibeen
ID: 1842456
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:46:11
From: Michael V
ID: 1842457
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Dunkley gone.

ENG: 6/233

Target: 257.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:46:19
From: sibeen
ID: 1842458
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:48:05
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1842460
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Dunkley gone.

ENG: 6/233

Target: 257.

How many overs left?

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:50:49
From: Michael V
ID: 1842465
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Witty Rejoinder said:


Michael V said:

Dunkley gone.

ENG: 6/233

Target: 257.

How many overs left?

4

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:51:46
From: Michael V
ID: 1842466
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Brunt gone.

ENG: 7/236

Target: 257.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:51:50
From: sibeen
ID: 1842467
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:51:59
From: dv
ID: 1842468
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Yes out of there

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 17:59:54
From: dv
ID: 1842471
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Fuck that’s a close one

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:00:08
From: Michael V
ID: 1842472
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Another gone!

ENG: 8/244

Target: 257.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:00:11
From: sibeen
ID: 1842473
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:01:15
From: dv
ID: 1842474
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Caught a skier

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:01:29
From: sibeen
ID: 1842475
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:02:50
From: Michael V
ID: 1842476
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Nine for!

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:10:35
From: Michael V
ID: 1842478
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Last over.

12 runs needed.

One wicket needed.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:15:07
From: dv
ID: 1842481
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bloody hell I don’t think they are socially distancing

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:15:17
From: dv
ID: 1842482
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

And a draw.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:15:18
From: Michael V
ID: 1842483
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Last over.

12 runs needed.

One wicket needed.

And: it’s a draw.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:15:35
From: sibeen
ID: 1842485
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

GREAT GAME

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:15:57
From: party_pants
ID: 1842486
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Michael V said:

Last over.

12 runs needed.

One wicket needed.

And: it’s a draw.

Ah well. Entertaining draw at least.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/01/2022 18:17:53
From: Michael V
ID: 1842487
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


GREAT GAME

Yep!

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 1/02/2022 19:09:49
From: dv
ID: 1843280
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

On the plus side the remaining three matches should be pretty clear, weatherwise

Reply Quote

Date: 1/02/2022 19:11:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 1843281
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


On the plus side the remaining three matches should be pretty clear, weatherwise

Looking forward to these.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/02/2022 19:17:25
From: Michael V
ID: 1843285
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


On the plus side the remaining three matches should be pretty clear, weatherwise

I sure hope so.

The Test was a cracker of a match.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 14:09:49
From: sibeen
ID: 1844009
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

England wins the toss and is going to bowl in the first ODI.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 14:22:39
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1844013
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


England wins the toss and is going to bowl in the first ODI.

rubs hands

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 14:24:03
From: sibeen
ID: 1844015
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 14:24:17
From: Michael V
ID: 1844016
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Haynes gone for 4.

AUS: 1/13

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 15:19:34
From: sibeen
ID: 1844044
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 15:22:11
From: sibeen
ID: 1844045
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 15:23:54
From: Michael V
ID: 1844046
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Bugger, I missed both. A neighbour was here.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 15:35:09
From: sibeen
ID: 1844047
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 15:39:21
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1844048
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


FUCK

They must be falling like rock stars in the early 70s.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 15:55:28
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1844050
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

They need to move it along a tad.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 15:58:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1844051
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


They need to move it along a tad.

I hope tad means a fucking lot.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 16:32:58
From: sibeen
ID: 1844060
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 16:46:56
From: sibeen
ID: 1844062
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 16:59:21
From: sibeen
ID: 1844066
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 17:15:24
From: Ian
ID: 1844072
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Australia Women have 175 runs with 3 FUCKS remaining

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 17:41:59
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1844081
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Ian said:


Australia Women have 175 runs with 3 FUCKS remaining

LOL

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 17:43:48
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1844082
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

England need 206 to win and Australia need 10 FUCK OFFS

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 18:20:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1844100
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 18:21:39
From: sibeen
ID: 1844101
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 19:28:55
From: Michael V
ID: 1844145
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


England need 206 to win and Australia need 10 FUCK OFFS

Amy Jones dismissed at the end of 20 overs.

ENG: 4/74

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 19:33:39
From: sibeen
ID: 1844147
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 19:35:30
From: Michael V
ID: 1844150
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


FUCK OFF

Was that for Dunkley?

ENG: 5/84

AUS were 4/69.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 19:52:58
From: sibeen
ID: 1844158
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 19:53:14
From: party_pants
ID: 1844159
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

good catch!

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 19:53:57
From: Michael V
ID: 1844160
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Sciver gone for 45.

Brilliant C&B by Darcie Brown.

ENG: 6/103

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 20:23:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1844169
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 20:26:09
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1844170
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Score? Chasing what?

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 20:27:35
From: sibeen
ID: 1844171
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Poms 7/136, Target is 206. 33rd over.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 20:35:46
From: sibeen
ID: 1844173
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 20:35:50
From: party_pants
ID: 1844174
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

That’s got to be out

wasted review

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 20:46:37
From: sibeen
ID: 1844176
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 21:01:08
From: party_pants
ID: 1844185
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

this ain’t over yet, England can still pull it off.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 21:02:29
From: Michael V
ID: 1844187
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


this ain’t over yet, England can still pull it off.

could…

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 21:08:59
From: party_pants
ID: 1844190
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

that’s it! Good sharp catch.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 21:09:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1844191
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

And that’s all folks.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 21:10:26
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1844192
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Job done.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2022 21:17:19
From: Michael V
ID: 1844193
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Ashes retained!

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 09:41:56
From: Michael V
ID: 1845209
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Ding, ding, ding: reminder!

Second ODI of the Ashes Series starts on or after 9am.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 09:49:45
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1845211
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Ding, ding, ding: reminder!

Second ODI of the Ashes Series starts on or after 9am.

:)

rubs hands

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 10:21:51
From: Michael V
ID: 1845221
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Beaumont caught behind for 6.

ENG: 1/11

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 10:49:43
From: Michael V
ID: 1845232
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Winfield Hill gone for 24.

ENG: 2/40

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 11:23:14
From: Michael V
ID: 1845256
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Sciver gone. Knight gone.

ENG: 4/59

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 11:24:17
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1845258
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Sciver gone. Knight gone.

ENG: 4/59

England gone.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 11:38:37
From: Michael V
ID: 1845270
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Dunkley gone for2.

ENG: 5/66

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 11:44:32
From: Michael V
ID: 1845275
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Wyatt gone for a duck.

What a catch!

ENG: 6/67

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 11:49:48
From: Michael V
ID: 1845277
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Dean gone for a duck.

ENG: 7/68

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 11:51:34
From: dv
ID: 1845278
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Dean gone for a duck.

ENG: 7/68

Holy shit

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 12:26:58
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1845296
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Although the Ashes are gone they said they were going to show more pluck and fight in this one.
They lied.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 12:31:05
From: party_pants
ID: 1845300
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


Although the Ashes are gone they said they were going to show more pluck and fight in this one.
They lied.

They probably all voted for Boris Johnson then.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 12:41:37
From: Michael V
ID: 1845307
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Jones gone for 28.

ENG: 8/107

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 12:43:40
From: Michael V
ID: 1845308
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Cross gone for a duck.

ENG: 9/107

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 12:44:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 1845309
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Cross gone for naught.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 12:45:30
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1845310
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

roughbarked said:


Cross gone for naught.

I think you’ll find that’s nort.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 12:46:49
From: dv
ID: 1845311
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

roughbarked said:


Cross gone for naught.

Heh

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 13:01:41
From: Michael V
ID: 1845316
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Shrubsole gone for 7.

ENG: all out for 129.

Target: 130.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 13:05:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 1845318
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Shrubsole gone for 7.

ENG: all out for 129.

Target: 130.

Doesn’t look too hard.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 13:56:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 1845359
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Haynes gone 1/17

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 13:56:06
From: Michael V
ID: 1845360
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Haynes gone for 10 runs.

AUS: 1/17

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 13:59:51
From: Michael V
ID: 1845366
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Lanning gone for a duck!

AUS: 2/18

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 14:29:36
From: Michael V
ID: 1845403
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Healy gone for 22.

AUS: 3/49

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 14:52:57
From: dv
ID: 1845415
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Healy gone for 22.

AUS: 3/49

Might have time for a second match at this rate

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 14:55:21
From: furious
ID: 1845416
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


Michael V said:

Healy gone for 22.

AUS: 3/49

Might have time for a second match at this rate

The English are probably keen to finish up so they can be ready for the Queen’s jubilee, UK time…

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 14:57:42
From: dv
ID: 1845417
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

furious said:


dv said:

Michael V said:

Healy gone for 22.

AUS: 3/49

Might have time for a second match at this rate

The English are probably keen to finish up so they can be ready for the Queen’s jubilee, UK time…

Plaitin’ ‘em

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:03:36
From: party_pants
ID: 1845420
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

furious said:


dv said:

Michael V said:

Healy gone for 22.

AUS: 3/49

Might have time for a second match at this rate

The English are probably keen to finish up so they can be ready for the Queen’s jubilee, UK time…

It is not till June. Today marks the anniversary of the death or her father, and technically she became Queen on this day, but it is considered bad form to to celebrate on the anniversary of the death date of the predecessor.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:04:32
From: dv
ID: 1845423
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


furious said:

dv said:

Might have time for a second match at this rate

The English are probably keen to finish up so they can be ready for the Queen’s jubilee, UK time…

It is not till June. Today marks the anniversary of the death or her father, and technically she became Queen on this day, but it is considered bad form to to celebrate on the anniversary of the death date of the predecessor.

I mean they literally are doing exactly that …

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:05:43
From: sibeen
ID: 1845425
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

BOTHER

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:05:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 1845426
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

4/85 McGrath gone.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:07:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 1845429
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


BOTHER

That’s polite of you. Is it because the women are watching?

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:17:53
From: Michael V
ID: 1845435
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Perry gone for 40.

AUS: 4/99

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:18:14
From: sibeen
ID: 1845436
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:19:10
From: Michael V
ID: 1845437
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Perry gone for 40.

AUS: 4/99

Sorry – five-fa.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:19:47
From: Michael V
ID: 1845438
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

dv said:


furious said:

dv said:

Might have time for a second match at this rate

The English are probably keen to finish up so they can be ready for the Queen’s jubilee, UK time…

Plaitin’ ‘em

Groan.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:20:15
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1845439
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

sibeen said:


FUCK

WHAT HAPPENED TO FUCKING BOTHER

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:21:40
From: sibeen
ID: 1845440
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Witty Rejoinder said:


sibeen said:

FUCK

WHAT HAPPENED TO FUCKING BOTHER

I was warming up.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:49:24
From: party_pants
ID: 1845454
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Aus win by 5 wickets with 14 and something overs to spare.

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 15:51:11
From: Michael V
ID: 1845457
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

party_pants said:


Aus win by 5 wickets with 14 and something overs to spare.

And thereby WIN the Ashes.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 16:28:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 1845477
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


party_pants said:

Aus win by 5 wickets with 14 and something overs to spare.

And thereby WIN the Ashes.

:)

So what was with the plastic splint on the umpire’s arm?

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 16:29:41
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1845480
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


party_pants said:

Aus win by 5 wickets with 14 and something overs to spare.

And thereby WIN the Ashes.

:)

Again?

Reply Quote

Date: 6/02/2022 17:28:38
From: Michael V
ID: 1845511
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


Michael V said:

party_pants said:

Aus win by 5 wickets with 14 and something overs to spare.

And thereby WIN the Ashes.

:)

Again?

Yes.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 10:04:29
From: Michael V
ID: 1846148
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Third ODI about to start. ENG won the toss and elected to bat.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 10:10:24
From: sibeen
ID: 1846152
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 10:10:39
From: Michael V
ID: 1846153
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Lamb gone for a duck.

ENG: 1/2

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 10:21:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 1846159
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Perry, two maidens one wicket.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 10:41:25
From: Michael V
ID: 1846164
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Knight gone for 9.

ENG: 1/19

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 10:42:12
From: Michael V
ID: 1846165
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


Knight gone for 9.

ENG: 1/19

2/19…

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:16:03
From: Michael V
ID: 1846224
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Beaumont gone for 50.

ENG: 3/107

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:16:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 1846225
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Beaumont gone for 50.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:34:00
From: sibeen
ID: 1846238
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:35:26
From: Michael V
ID: 1846240
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Wyatt gone for 9.

ENG: 4/124

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:36:17
From: Michael V
ID: 1846241
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

XXX gone for XXX.

ENG: 5/XXX

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:37:41
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1846243
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Michael V said:


XXX gone for XXX.

ENG: 5/XXX

Woohoo.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:39:56
From: sibeen
ID: 1846244
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:40:20
From: Michael V
ID: 1846245
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Sciver gone for 46.

ENG: 5/125

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:45:59
From: sibeen
ID: 1846246
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:46:02
From: Michael V
ID: 1846247
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Ecclestone gone for 2.

ENG: 6/128

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:56:31
From: Michael V
ID: 1846250
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Jones gone for 4.

ENG: 7/136

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 12:56:49
From: sibeen
ID: 1846251
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 13:01:18
From: sibeen
ID: 1846254
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 13:01:35
From: Michael V
ID: 1846255
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Shrubsole gone for 2.

ENG: 8/139

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 13:18:28
From: sibeen
ID: 1846272
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 13:18:46
From: Michael V
ID: 1846274
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Farrant gone for 7.

ENG: 9/159

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 13:23:12
From: sibeen
ID: 1846276
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 13:23:31
From: Michael V
ID: 1846277
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Davies gone for 1.

ENG: all out for 163 in 49.3 overs.

AUS target: 164.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 13:26:03
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1846278
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

They should be able to fit in a T20 after this is over.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 13:39:45
From: Michael V
ID: 1846288
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Peak Warming Man said:


They should be able to fit in a T20 after this is over.

LOL

Replace one that was washed out?

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 14:50:51
From: sibeen
ID: 1846320
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

DRAT

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 14:54:05
From: sibeen
ID: 1846321
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 14:55:17
From: Michael V
ID: 1846322
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Healy gone for 42. Haynes gone for 31.

AUS: 2/74.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 15:58:58
From: Michael V
ID: 1846335
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

AUS wins by 8 wickets, with 13.5 overs to spare.

Well done!

Ashes well and truly won.

:)

:)

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 16:00:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1846337
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Need an extra game as PWM stated :)

Reply Quote

Date: 8/02/2022 16:00:09
From: Michael V
ID: 1846338
Subject: re: Women's Ashes

Meg Lanning finished the innings off with a 6.

Well done Captain!

Reply Quote