Might make more sense to give Semantle its own thread now.

Tfft

213 guesses.

I can’t complain, it was indeed semantically adjacent to the close hits.

dv said:

Tfft

213 guesses

I don’t have that much patience.

dv said:

Tfft

213 guesses.

I can’t complain, it was indeed semantically adjacent to the close hits.

told you about that 993 though eh bro

SCIENCE said:

dv said:

Tfft

213 guesses.

I can’t complain, it was indeed semantically adjacent to the close hits.

told you about that 993 though eh bro

No, got that very early.

plea.

*makes notes not to try too hard.

sarahs mum said:

plea.

*makes notes not to try too hard.

I hit on lawyer in 17 guesses which got me to 951 and then spend about 200 guesses on other legal terms before finally getting it.

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

plea.

*makes notes not to try too hard.

I hit on lawyer in 17 guesses which got me to 951 and then spend about 200 guesses on other legal terms before finally getting it.

Your persistence is admirable but perplexing.

Witty Rejoinder said:

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

plea.

*makes notes not to try too hard.

I hit on lawyer in 17 guesses which got me to 951 and then spend about 200 guesses on other legal terms before finally getting it.

Your persistence is admirable but perplexing.

Pfffft as if DV knows 200 legal terms.

JudgeMental said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

dv said:

I hit on lawyer in 17 guesses which got me to 951 and then spend about 200 guesses on other legal terms before finally getting it.

Your persistence is admirable but perplexing.

Pfffft as if DV knows 200 legal terms.

I was hung up in remorse and tearfulness and other sad things.

Today I am on 992/1000 on my 51st guess. I think I’m almost getting the hang.

JudgeMental said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

dv said:

I hit on lawyer in 17 guesses which got me to 951 and then spend about 200 guesses on other legal terms before finally getting it.

Your persistence is admirable but perplexing.

Pfffft as if DV knows 200 legal terms.

Lot of -s, -ed, -ing, -ment

dv said:

Today I am on 992/1000 on my 51st guess. I think I’m almost getting the hang.

51st guess…940/1000

FOUND on 55.

Got to 984 by 50, my best effort yet, took me until 79 to finally get it. Maybe I should retire now…

Aw yeah

dv said:

Aw yeah

intrigued by guess 64.

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

Aw yeah

intrigued by guess 64.

Do you want to know what it was?

This game is shit! …there I’ve said it.

storms off

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

Aw yeah

intrigued by guess 64.

Do you want to know what it was?

sure. Make me scroll down for it or send it to facebook.

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

intrigued by guess 64.

Do you want to know what it was?

sure. Make me scroll down for it or send it to facebook.

Well the reason it was ???? was that it was capitalised, per policy:

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
scrolling scrolling scrolling rawhide
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
God

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

Do you want to know what it was?

sure. Make me scroll down for it or send it to facebook.

Well the reason it was ???? was that it was capitalised, per policy:

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
scrolling scrolling scrolling rawhide
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
God

:)

ta.

49 for me today.

Yesterday’s was almost double that, 94 or 96, but I did use DV’s “God” clue.

Speedy said:

49 for me today.

Yesterday’s was almost double that, 94 or 96, but I did use DV’s “God” clue.

sigh.

I’m up to 67 and have only got 767/1000

sarahs mum said:

Speedy said:

49 for me today.

Yesterday’s was almost double that, 94 or 96, but I did use DV’s “God” clue.

sigh.

I’m up to 67 and have only got 767/1000

I got 980 after 14, and I’m still going, got 992 at 60…

I got 6/58 once but I’ll admit it was on a rain affected uncovered wicket.

sarahs mum said:

Speedy said:

49 for me today.

Yesterday’s was almost double that, 94 or 96, but I did use DV’s “God” clue.

sigh.

I’m up to 67 and have only got 767/1000

I’m on 677 after 30 but hmm

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

Speedy said:

49 for me today.

Yesterday’s was almost double that, 94 or 96, but I did use DV’s “God” clue.

sigh.

I’m up to 67 and have only got 767/1000

I’m on 677 after 30 but hmm

I haven’t made headway in my last 30 guesses.

Peak Warming Man said:

I got 6/58 once but I’ll admit it was on a rain affected uncovered wicket.

Where was this?

Michael V said:

Peak Warming Man said:

I got 6/58 once but I’ll admit it was on a rain affected uncovered wicket.

Where was this?

Michael V said:

Peak Warming Man said:

I got 6/58 once but I’ll admit it was on a rain affected uncovered wicket.

Where was this?

Backyard at mums I presume.

980 after 77

dv said:

980 after 77

Detonates relatives and flies to Dover.

982 after 90, slow progress, might rest it

dv said:

982 after 90, slow progress, might rest it

I have had 40 guesses with no progress. I am filling up the lower green rankings tho.

980

sarahs mum said:

980

982.

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

980

982.

Holy shit we just chucked a dv and have a warning for yousa’l…

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

980

982.

Holy shit we just chucked a dv and have a warning for yousa’l…

385? I am only up to 240.

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

982.

Holy shit we just chucked a dv and have a warning for yousa’l…

385? I am only up to 240.

hopefully you do better than us but damn that was an interesting journey

have to say after the past few days we are locking in our objection to the way their author describes it as “similarity”, videre licet

By “semantically similar”, I mean, roughly “used in the context of similar words, in a database of news articles.”

You found it in 244!

The struggle ends.

385? Holy shit dude.

dv said:

385? Holy shit dude.

yeah well some of them were spamming of the derivative-words style, and others just bored drifting, but there were some seemingly disconnected close hits there

as we said, we are locking in our objection to the way their author describes it as “similarity”, videre licet

By “semantically similar”, I mean, roughly “used in the context of similar words, in a database of news articles.”

and probably “association” or “closeness” would be less misleading but hey we didn’t write it so they get to call it whatever they like

we’ll probably give up on the next few and write a different -le for your entertainments

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

Holy shit we just chucked a dv and have a warning for yousa’l…

385? I am only up to 240.

hopefully you do better than us but damn that was an interesting journey

have to say after the past few days we are locking in our objection to the way their author describes it as “similarity”, videre licet

By “semantically similar”, I mean, roughly “used in the context of similar words, in a database of news articles.”

There are so many levels of meaning to today’s word. But balanced scores 14.94 and storey rates 9.15 and even 22.78.

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

385? I am only up to 240.

hopefully you do better than us but damn that was an interesting journey

have to say after the past few days we are locking in our objection to the way their author describes it as “similarity”, videre licet

By “semantically similar”, I mean, roughly “used in the context of similar words, in a database of news articles.”

There are so many levels of meaning to today’s word. But balanced scores 14.94 and storey rates 9.15 and even 22.78.

equivalent 18.54

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

hopefully you do better than us but damn that was an interesting journey

have to say after the past few days we are locking in our objection to the way their author describes it as “similarity”, videre licet

By “semantically similar”, I mean, roughly “used in the context of similar words, in a database of news articles.”

There are so many levels of meaning to today’s word. But balanced scores 14.94 and storey rates 9.15 and even 22.78.

equivalent 18.54

flat 10.89
uniform 12.63
plumb 6.25 !

I think henceforth if I don’t get it within 100 I’ll consider myself to have lost the game and just give up.

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

There are so many levels of meaning to today’s word. But balanced scores 14.94 and storey rates 9.15 and even 22.78.

equivalent 18.54

flat 10.89
uniform 12.63
plumb 6.25 !

those too.

dv said:

I think henceforth if I don’t get it within 100 I’ll consider myself to have lost the game and just give up.

Wordle is civilised in comparison.

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

I think henceforth if I don’t get it within 100 I’ll consider myself to have lost the game and just give up.

Wordle is civilised in comparison.

I might code up a rival game. Firstly, regard various parts of speech of a single word to be equivalent. Secondly, rate the similarity by simple average distance in a synonymity network.

My four question mark reponse was for ‘skillset’ and it rated it. I don’t know why.

sarahs mum said:

My four question mark reponse was for ‘skillset’ and it rated it. I don’t know why.

I guess it just one of the many words that semantle doesn’t know

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

My four question mark reponse was for ‘skillset’ and it rated it. I don’t know why.

I guess it just one of the many words that semantle doesn’t know

but it rated it in the 200/1000s. Very confusing semantle this time.

53 here today

Speedy said:

53 here today

Gosh, that’s hot!

I hope you’ve got the fan on.

Speedy said:

53 here today

I am on guess 50 and scoring 978/1000

sarahs mum said:

Speedy said:

53 here today

I am on guess 50 and scoring 978/1000

Is this puzzle 23?

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

Speedy said:

53 here today

I am on guess 50 and scoring 978/1000

Is this puzzle 23?

yep.

I know I said I was limiting myself to 100 guesses but on #98 Ihabe 995/1000 so I’ll press on for a few more

dv said:

I know I said I was limiting myself to 100 guesses but on #98 Ihabe 995/1000 so I’ll press on for a few more

62 guesses and 993/1000. But I am feeling a little stuck.

I’m on 44 and no closer than 511/1000.

It’s a frustrating sort of game. Reminds me of those Two Ronnies sketches where they’d be chatting in a pub and little Ronnie would keep getting stuck for a word, and big Ronnie would keep suggesting the wrong thing.

Okay I gave up. Not terribly happy. There are words must closer to the target word that got himdrum similarity figures.

Bubblecar said:

I’m on 44 and no closer than 511/1000.

It’s a frustrating sort of game. Reminds me of those Two Ronnies sketches where they’d be chatting in a pub and little Ronnie would keep getting stuck for a word, and big Ronnie would keep suggesting the wrong thing.

Heh I was just watching that the other day.

still on 993 but I have so many more green words now.

Laugh Out Loud well today’s was a bit silly but here…

SCIENCE said:

Laugh Out Loud well today’s was a bit silly but here…

the rest but we did promise to avoid burning 400 guesses so in the next reply you can have a preview of our shitty response to all the -le obsessions

SCIENCE said:

Laugh Out Loud well today’s was a bit silly but here…

I’m done with semantle for real this time, yesterday was just ridiculous. With a target word “seek”, the really hot words included “provide”, “give”, “obtain”, “bring”, but not “look”, “search”. “Sought” was as cold as a Tauntaun’s balls.

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

SCIENCE said:

Laugh Out Loud well today’s was a bit silly but here…

the rest but we did promise to avoid burning 400 guesses so in the next reply you can have a preview of our shitty response to all the -le obsessions

I’m done with semantle for real this time, yesterday was just ridiculous. With a target word “seek”, the really hot words included “provide”, “give”, “obtain”, “bring”, but not “look”, “search”. “Sought” was as cold as a Tauntaun’s balls.

that’s quitter talk, but for consolation we offer everyone our prize here, don’t say we don’t keep our promises

http://void.byethost10.com/turdle.html

begins pointed upwards

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

Laugh Out Loud well today’s was a bit silly but here…

I’m done with semantle for real this time, yesterday was just ridiculous. With a target word “seek”, the really hot words included “provide”, “give”, “obtain”, “bring”, but not “look”, “search”. “Sought” was as cold as a Tauntaun’s balls.

you were right. I was pissed when I found out. I might also find something more constructive to be do.

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

Laugh Out Loud well today’s was a bit silly but here…

I’m done with semantle for real this time, yesterday was just ridiculous. With a target word “seek”, the really hot words included “provide”, “give”, “obtain”, “bring”, but not “look”, “search”. “Sought” was as cold as a Tauntaun’s balls.

I got it in 110 today. That’s a fail.

I’ve given up on this game too. It’s just tedious and a bit lame.

Bubblecar said:

I’ve given up on this game too. It’s just tedious and a bit lame.

but mostly…wrong.

sarahs mum said:

Bubblecar said:

I’ve given up on this game too. It’s just tedious and a bit lame.

but mostly…wrong.

Aye, that too.

I was going to leave semantle alone but during some boredom tonight I stuck some words in.

I got lots and lot of cold words until suddenly at word 30 I went green with ‘sport’ 782/1000

I tried lots and lots of different sporting related words and they all scored badly.

My 98th guess was ‘country’ for 998. So I tried countries and nations and national and such.

My 106th guess was ‘world’. Bingo. ( ‘International’ scored 980/1000..so shrug…I still don’t understand.)

This game can be very frustrating. Yesterday it took me 240 tries, but I only found it after abandoning the ‘clues’ and trying random words again.

Today’s was much better at 41, but the words I considered closest were ranked 721 and 722.

Speedy said:

This game can be very frustrating. Yesterday it took me 240 tries, but I only found it after abandoning the ‘clues’ and trying random words again.

Today’s was much better at 41, but the words I considered closest were ranked 721 and 722.

I played it yesterday with Sarah. We got out in just over a hundred. Not that it made sense.

I suppose I am bored enough to play again today.

I started semantling today while Fiona was here. It was more fun then. Play with me if you fee like it.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
51 poet 55.56 984/1000
50 author 50.44 968/1000
56 storyteller 47.54 939/1000
49 writer 46.67 929/1000
53 bard 40.64 808/1000
55 composer 40.43 802/1000
52 poetry 36.90 673/1000
37 fiction 33.69 442/1000
57 laureate 30.63 86/1000
28 poetic 30.04 (cold)

have not made any head way.

>.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.

51 poet 55.56 984/1000
65 essayist 55.54 983/1000
50 author 50.44 968/1000
64 novelist 50.40 967/1000
56 storyteller 47.54 939/1000
74 journalist 47.10 933/1000
49 writer 46.67 929/1000
78 painter 44.30 891/1000
72 columnist 42.99 872/1000
59 playwright 42.37 856/1000
67 poets 41.92 846/1000
70 pamphleteer 40.88 815/1000
53 bard 40.64 808/1000
55 composer 40.43 802/1000
52 poetry 36.90 673/1000
62 artist 36.80 667/1000
71 editor 35.11 563/1000
61 wordsmith 34.96 550/1000
37 fiction 33.69 442/1000
75 reporter 32.54 325/1000
66 poem 31.09 148/1000
57 laureate 30.63 86/1000

sarahs mum said:

have not made any head way.

>.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.

51 poet 55.56 984/1000
65 essayist 55.54 983/1000
50 author 50.44 968/1000
64 novelist 50.40 967/1000
56 storyteller 47.54 939/1000
74 journalist 47.10 933/1000
49 writer 46.67 929/1000
78 painter 44.30 891/1000
72 columnist 42.99 872/1000
59 playwright 42.37 856/1000
67 poets 41.92 846/1000
70 pamphleteer 40.88 815/1000
53 bard 40.64 808/1000
55 composer 40.43 802/1000
52 poetry 36.90 673/1000
62 artist 36.80 667/1000
71 editor 35.11 563/1000
61 wordsmith 34.96 550/1000
37 fiction 33.69 442/1000
75 reporter 32.54 325/1000
66 poem 31.09 148/1000
57 laureate 30.63 86/1000

interesting, we’ve been inspired and ended up approaching another angle, but gave up anyway

as said before, the game concept has potential

if you find the other approach, and combine them, it might actually lead to the answer

pushers aren’t your friends

philosopher 56.74 987/1000

theorist 56.74 988/1000

anthropologist 60.11 992/1000

sociologist 60.53 993/1000

sarahs mum said:

sociologist 60.53 993/1000

I entered palaeoanthropologist and the response was:

Unusual word found! This word is not in the list of “normal” words that we use for the top-1000 list, but it is still similar! (Is it maybe capitalized?)

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

sociologist 60.53 993/1000

I entered palaeoanthropologist and the response was:

Unusual word found! This word is not in the list of “normal” words that we use for the top-1000 list, but it is still similar! (Is it maybe capitalized?)

Try the US spelling

I’ve found the word.

>You found it in 13!

…but I was of course building on sarahs mum’s much longer labours :)

Bubblecar said:

I’ve found the word.

>You found it in 13!

…but I was of course building on sarahs mum’s much longer labours :)

give us a clue then.

sarahs mum said:

Bubblecar said:

I’ve found the word.

>You found it in 13!

…but I was of course building on sarahs mum’s much longer labours :)

give us a clue then.

The academic theme is on the right sort of track, but it’s not an “ologist”.

Not quite so paleo

dv said:

Not quite so paleo

it says it does not know the word ‘ontologist.’

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

Not quite so paleo

it says it does not know the word ‘ontologist.’

It’s not very bright :)

But as I said, abandon the “ologists” and think of more old-fashioned disciplines.

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

Not quite so paleo

it says it does not know the word ‘ontologist.’

It’s not very bright :)

But as I said, abandon the “ologists” and think of more old-fashioned disciplines.

It’s probably ‘engineer’. That is a good word.

sibeen said:

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

it says it does not know the word ‘ontologist.’

It’s not very bright :)

But as I said, abandon the “ologists” and think of more old-fashioned disciplines.

It’s probably ‘engineer’. That is a good word.

Try spinning, that’s a good trick.

got it. thank goodness.

sarahs mum said:

got it. thank goodness.

:)

67 enthusiasm 45.93 986/1000
68 passion 43.17 984/1000
81 enjoyment 40.50 974/1000
85 love 36.07 943/1000
75 keenness 33.81 915/1000
82 willingness 32.94 894/1000
73 diligence 32.78 889/1000
69 joy 32.23 874/1000
59 exuberance 32.04 870/1000
79 eagerness 31.55 858/1000
60 excitement 29.72 788/1000

haven’t got anywhere for a while now.

dedication 46.79 989/1000

sarahs mum said:

dedication 46.79 989/1000

devotion 49.83 992/1000

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

dedication 46.79 989/1000

devotion 49.83 992/1000

at least they’re all kind of similar eh

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

dedication 46.79 989/1000

devotion 49.83 992/1000

at least they’re all kind of similar eh

I typed dedication and then started singing in my brain ‘the dedication, the devotion, of turning all the night times into the day.’ And I typed it in and it worked.

You found it in 110!

65 religious 51.34 962/1000
78 moral 50.45 947/1000
81 philosophic 47.21 873/1000
89 morality 44.73 778/1000
128 doctrine 44.61 771/1000
102 religion 43.81 727/1000
100 cultural 41.84 592/1000
87 sophistry 40.66 485/1000
—-
stuck
not even filling out the lesser greens while I am guessing away.

sarahs mum said:

65 religious 51.34 962/1000
78 moral 50.45 947/1000
81 philosophic 47.21 873/1000
89 morality 44.73 778/1000
128 doctrine 44.61 771/1000
102 religion 43.81 727/1000
100 cultural 41.84 592/1000
87 sophistry 40.66 485/1000
—-
stuck
not even filling out the lesser greens while I am guessing away.

Yesterday’s word was “ideological”.

You found it in 146!

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 146!

What was it?

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 146!

Well done and I hope you were well rewarded for your trouble.

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 146!

What was it?

146 piano 100.00 FOUND!
130 concerto 62.58 961/1000
142 percussion 62.48 960/1000
115 orchestra 62.44 959/1000
137 soloist 62.31 958/1000
143 woodwind 62.01 954/1000
116 orchestral 61.88 953/1000
111 recital 57.88 908/1000
125 symphonic 53.69 812/1000
141 choir 53.46 803/1000
118 symphony 51.32 729/1000
124 ensemble 51.21 726/1000
133 nocturne 51.18 724/1000
122 ballet 49.67 663/1000
78 conservatory 47.53 596/1000
138 fugue 46.61 552/1000
136 aria 45.62 503/1000
144 strings 44.22 428/1000
117 opera 44.04 418/1000
110 conservatorium 43.53 387/1000
119 conductor 42.50 323/1000
112 rehearse 42.49 322/1000
126 philharmonic 41.75 277/1000
127 band 40.12 155/1000
134 serenade 38.51 35/1000

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 146!

What was it?

146 piano 100.00 FOUND!
130 concerto 62.58 961/1000
142 percussion 62.48 960/1000
115 orchestra 62.44 959/1000
137 soloist 62.31 958/1000
143 woodwind 62.01 954/1000
116 orchestral 61.88 953/1000
111 recital 57.88 908/1000
125 symphonic 53.69 812/1000
141 choir 53.46 803/1000
118 symphony 51.32 729/1000
124 ensemble 51.21 726/1000
133 nocturne 51.18 724/1000
122 ballet 49.67 663/1000
78 conservatory 47.53 596/1000
138 fugue 46.61 552/1000
136 aria 45.62 503/1000
144 strings 44.22 428/1000
117 opera 44.04 418/1000
110 conservatorium 43.53 387/1000
119 conductor 42.50 323/1000
112 rehearse 42.49 322/1000
126 philharmonic 41.75 277/1000
127 band 40.12 155/1000
134 serenade 38.51 35/1000

After all that, I hope you struck a dramatic chord on your own pianoforte.

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

dv said:

What was it?

146 piano 100.00 FOUND!
130 concerto 62.58 961/1000
142 percussion 62.48 960/1000
115 orchestra 62.44 959/1000
137 soloist 62.31 958/1000
143 woodwind 62.01 954/1000
116 orchestral 61.88 953/1000
111 recital 57.88 908/1000
125 symphonic 53.69 812/1000
141 choir 53.46 803/1000
118 symphony 51.32 729/1000
124 ensemble 51.21 726/1000
133 nocturne 51.18 724/1000
122 ballet 49.67 663/1000
78 conservatory 47.53 596/1000
138 fugue 46.61 552/1000
136 aria 45.62 503/1000
144 strings 44.22 428/1000
117 opera 44.04 418/1000
110 conservatorium 43.53 387/1000
119 conductor 42.50 323/1000
112 rehearse 42.49 322/1000
126 philharmonic 41.75 277/1000
127 band 40.12 155/1000
134 serenade 38.51 35/1000

After all that, I hope you struck a dramatic chord on your own pianoforte.

I just tried violin.]

violin 82.28 999/1000

Weird that the closest word was violin

147 violin 82.28 999/1000
149 harpsichord 73.12 993/1000
148 harp 65.73 977/1000
clavier 51.12 721/1000

sarahs mum said:

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

146 piano 100.00 FOUND!
130 concerto 62.58 961/1000
142 percussion 62.48 960/1000
115 orchestra 62.44 959/1000
137 soloist 62.31 958/1000
143 woodwind 62.01 954/1000
116 orchestral 61.88 953/1000
111 recital 57.88 908/1000
125 symphonic 53.69 812/1000
141 choir 53.46 803/1000
118 symphony 51.32 729/1000
124 ensemble 51.21 726/1000
133 nocturne 51.18 724/1000
122 ballet 49.67 663/1000
78 conservatory 47.53 596/1000
138 fugue 46.61 552/1000
136 aria 45.62 503/1000
144 strings 44.22 428/1000
117 opera 44.04 418/1000
110 conservatorium 43.53 387/1000
119 conductor 42.50 323/1000
112 rehearse 42.49 322/1000
126 philharmonic 41.75 277/1000
127 band 40.12 155/1000
134 serenade 38.51 35/1000

After all that, I hope you struck a dramatic chord on your own pianoforte.

I just tried violin.]

violin 82.28 999/1000

Weird that the closest word was violin

147 violin 82.28 999/1000
149 harpsichord 73.12 993/1000
148 harp 65.73 977/1000
clavier 51.12 721/1000

Sort of inaccuracy that bedevils that game.

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 146!

Much better than my 237 today. It took more than 200 to get to the green bars, then piano was my first guess after I thought it might be an ‘instrument’.

237 piano 100.00 FOUND!
234 melody 60.93 944/1000
223 singing 54.26 832/1000
231 choir 53.46 803/1000
230 vocalist 50.62 701/1000
222 sing 49.60 660/1000
236 instrument 46.88 563/1000
232 hymn 44.26 432/1000
226 lyric 43.77 406/1000
227 song 42.36 315/1000
233 chorus 36.60 (cold)
235 lyricist 36.60 (cold)
229 vocal 36.48 (cold)
86 meditation 33.98 (cold)
228 singer 33.38 (cold)
220 hum 33.29 (cold)
28 trampoline 30.69 (cold)

Speedy said:

Much better than my 237 today.

sheesh with these levels of addiction NYT must be winding up to pay 50 billion for this one

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

Bubblecar said:

After all that, I hope you struck a dramatic chord on your own pianoforte.

I just tried violin.]

violin 82.28 999/1000

Weird that the closest word was violin

147 violin 82.28 999/1000
149 harpsichord 73.12 993/1000
148 harp 65.73 977/1000
clavier 51.12 721/1000

Sort of inaccuracy that bedevils that game.

maybe the better way to understand it is not synonyms, but substitutes

SCIENCE said:

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

I just tried violin.]

violin 82.28 999/1000

Weird that the closest word was violin

147 violin 82.28 999/1000
149 harpsichord 73.12 993/1000
148 harp 65.73 977/1000
clavier 51.12 721/1000

Sort of inaccuracy that bedevils that game.

maybe the better way to understand it is not synonyms, but substitutes

I’d like my piano substituted by a keyboard and not a violin.

keyboard 54.14 826/1000

I did used to play a game with the kids when they were little where you take turns changing one letter in a word until you can’t any more (repeats not allowed). Like a road trip game. I wonder whether I could implement and publish that.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 146!

Much better than my 237 today. It took more than 200 to get to the green bars, then piano was my first guess after I thought it might be an ‘instrument’.

237 piano 100.00 FOUND!
234 melody 60.93 944/1000
223 singing 54.26 832/1000
231 choir 53.46 803/1000
230 vocalist 50.62 701/1000
222 sing 49.60 660/1000
236 instrument 46.88 563/1000
232 hymn 44.26 432/1000
226 lyric 43.77 406/1000
227 song 42.36 315/1000
233 chorus 36.60 (cold)
235 lyricist 36.60 (cold)
229 vocal 36.48 (cold)
86 meditation 33.98 (cold)
228 singer 33.38 (cold)
220 hum 33.29 (cold)
28 trampoline 30.69 (cold)

That trampoline clue is a bit weird.

My closest to that I had was sideboard. And one could imagine a piano and a sideboard.

You found it in 63!

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

111111 in binary

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

No I didn’t!

Michael V said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

No I didn’t!

Neither did I. 216 for me today, despite being at 963 after 14 guesses.

Michael V said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

No I didn’t!

I was only a toddler in ’63.

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

111111 in binary

63! is much more than that.

Speedy said:

Michael V said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

No I didn’t!

Neither did I. 216 for me today, despite being at 963 after 14 guesses.

I got into the 1000 on my 13th go. But I was confused for a while.

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

111111 in binary

63! is much more than that.

And I wonder how that looks in binary.

Michael V said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

111111 in binary

63! is much more than that.

And I wonder how that looks in binary.

Well in decimal it is about:
8.24765059208247E+90
which is quite a lot.

The Rev Dodgson said:

Michael V said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

63! is much more than that.

And I wonder how that looks in binary.

Well in decimal it is about:
8.24765059208247E+90
which is quite a lot.

I guess

You found it in 84!

And I only had 5 green band answers before I got it/

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 84!

And I only had 5 green band answers before I got it/

noice

so do yous reckon you can get dv back into addictive relapse by starting him with number 1000 for example or restricting the case or part of speech or something each time

SCIENCE said:

so do yous reckon you can get dv back into addictive relapse by starting him with number 1000 for example or restricting the case or part of speech or something each time

The game needs to be shorter and smarter to make DV happier.

Aside: I get a lot of negative guesses. How does that work?

You found it in 59!

so with all the fun and games here today we just couldn’t resist

https://semantle.novalis.org/

turns out today didn’t cost too much time

Laugh Out Loud

SCIENCE said:

so with all the fun and games here today we just couldn’t resist

https://semantle.novalis.org/

turns out today didn’t cost too much time

Laugh Out Loud

I am struggling a bit.

I am up to 966/1000.

I have been playing this…

https://wikitrivia.tomjwatson.com/

I have scored 17 three times .I think it gets harder as you go along.

just to tempt the susceptible, the spoiler is

500 multicolored 27.43

You found it in 51!

sorry forgot to add

Laugh Out Loud

You found it in 19!

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 19!

Brilliant.

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 19!

Nice one

and I just got a run of 19 on wikitrivia.

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 19!

Nice one

since we’re slightly bored we’ll ask semantle to tease and tempt dv with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 eyelashes 28.33
98765432109876543210

SCIENCE said:

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 19!

Nice one

since we’re slightly bored we’ll ask semantle to tease and tempt dv with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 eyelashes 28.33
98765432109876543210

I think I’ve already announced my departure from the world of semantle

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

dv said:

Nice one

since we’re slightly bored we’ll ask semantle to tease and tempt dv with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 eyelashes 28.33
98765432109876543210

I think I’ve already announced my departure from the world of semantle

nah we can still throw out the baited hook but anyway

wait until we code up our next 2 games and you’ll LOL we’re sure

since we’re slightly bored we’ll ask semantle to tease and tempt dv with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 daybook 21.45
98765432109876543210

though yesterday’s bat was kind of intellectually interesting

it did really expose the bias inherent in

Q: What data set did you use?

A: GoogleNews-vectors-negative300.bin from late 2021

SCIENCE said:

since we’re slightly bored we’ll ask semantle to tease and tempt dv with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 daybook 21.45
98765432109876543210

though yesterday’s bat was kind of intellectually interesting

it did really expose the bias inherent in

Q: What data set did you use?

A: GoogleNews-vectors-negative300.bin from late 2021

I started to get close yesterday when I went from the word hedge to the word boundary.And then words like fence and border got me nowhere so I went for cricket and zoomed up the list. then I went bowler, batsman and bat and I had it.

I thought it was weird how it was about cricket.

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

since we’re slightly bored we’ll ask semantle to tease and tempt dv with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 daybook 21.45
98765432109876543210

though yesterday’s bat was kind of intellectually interesting

it did really expose the bias inherent in

Q: What data set did you use?

A: GoogleNews-vectors-negative300.bin from late 2021

I started to get close yesterday when I went from the word hedge to the word boundary.And then words like fence and border got me nowhere so I went for cricket and zoomed up the list. then I went bowler, batsman and bat and I had it.

I thought it was weird how it was about cricket.

yeah we went through like 200 hand-held weapons getting mostly below 800 and then got pissed off and sequenced a few animals

apart from gloves we completely missed the cricket connecting but damn

You found it in 45!

we’ll ask semantle to tease and tempt dv with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 right 23.78
98765432109876543210

doesn’t seem all that helpful maybe or maybe it is

Haven’t played recently, because I find it frustrating but as I had some time to kill I thought I’d have a go today.

You found it in 50!

Best one yet…

furious said:

Haven’t played recently, because I find it frustrating but as I had some time to kill I thought I’d have a go today.

You found it in 50!

Best one yet…

Well done.

furious said:

Haven’t played recently, because I find it frustrating but as I had some time to kill I thought I’d have a go today.

You found it in 50!

Best one yet…

That’s not too shabby at all.

213 for me today.

furious said:

Haven’t played recently, because I find it frustrating but as I had some time to kill I thought I’d have a go today.

You found it in 50!

Best one yet…

:)

I’m only just starting on it.

up to 143 and stuck on 945/1000.

failed at semantling.
I have no idea what the subject is.

124 bounds 32.16 945/1000
208 perimeter 29.02 875/1000
117 range 28.85 873/1000
59 zone 28.75 869/1000
128 distance 28.27 854/1000
221 edge 27.18 788/1000
76 continent 25.20 645/1000
178 tundra 25.03 629/1000
64 expanse 24.85 615/1000
52 territory 24.57 584/1000
55 realm 24.56 582/1000
139 stretch 24.55 579/1000
60 area 24.33 562/1000
73 sphere 23.54 470/1000
183 desert 23.35 446/1000
216 margin 23.29 435/1000
228 pole 23.27 428/1000
91 landscape 22.12 237/1000
102 hemisphere 21.71 157/1000
154 unfenced 21.70 155/1000
132 distances 21.68 145/1000
46 country 21.34 60/1000
210 coast 21.19 20/1000

we’ll ask semantle to tease and tempt dv with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 inside 25.25
98765432109876543210

doesn’t seem all that helpful maybe or maybe it is

field. field.

I said I didn’t have it down.

failed at semantling.
I have no idea what the subject is. also some of these words do not remind me of ‘field’ at all. also if I had played y exact words for the day before I would have got it out in 6.

124 bounds 32.16 945/1000
208 perimeter 29.02 875/1000
117 range 28.85 873/1000
59 zone 28.75 869/1000
128 distance 28.27 854/1000
221 edge 27.18 788/1000
76 continent 25.20 645/1000
178 tundra 25.03 629/1000
64 expanse 24.85 615/1000
52 territory 24.57 584/1000
55 realm 24.56 582/1000
139 stretch 24.55 579/1000
60 area 24.33 562/1000
73 sphere 23.54 470/1000
183 desert 23.35 446/1000
216 margin 23.29 435/1000
228 pole 23.27 428/1000
91 landscape 22.12 237/1000
102 hemisphere 21.71 157/1000
154 unfenced 21.70 155/1000
132 distances 21.68 145/1000
46 country 21.34 60/1000
210 coast 21.19 20/1000

You found it in 68!
——

thank fnc

we’ll ask semantle to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 ingrates 28.41
98765432109876543210

who knows

You found it in 129!

In a surpising semantling I spent some time getting into the green band and did so at 865/1000. I changed the tense of that word and found the answer. That was somewhat flukey.

You found it in 38!

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 mobilizer 24.64
98765432109876543210

pretty simple really

SCIENCE said:

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789
500 mobilizer 24.64
98765432109876543210

pretty simple really

got it out in 48.

You found it in 5!

Well I suppose I will have to find something else to do.

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 5!

Well I suppose I will have to find something else to do.

Wow!

I thought I did well this morning with 28.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 5!

Well I suppose I will have to find something else to do.

Wow!

I thought I did well this morning with 28.

28 is good.
But not surprising like 5. I was surprised.

sarahs mum said:

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 5!

Well I suppose I will have to find something else to do.

Wow!

I thought I did well this morning with 28.

28 is good.
But not surprising like 5. I was surprised.

nice, what was the sequence

adapt this despoiler* if you like

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

0123456789012345678901
500 	bought 	21.69
1098765432109876543210

*: yeah yeah

also note that looking through their https://semantle.novalis.org/nearby_1k/bWFuYWdlcg== nearest words list we’re a bit inclined to disagree with what’s been included, namely a whole bunch of what really would be abbreviations rather than “true words for the purist”, like

997 	vp 	60.11
987 	mgr 	47.70
969 	exec 	40.62
927 	veep 	34.34
892 	rep 	31.35
885 	md 	30.89
872 	prexy 	29.98

though admittedly they aren’t the majority

SCIENCE said:

we’re a bit inclined to disagree with what’s been included, namely a whole bunch of

997 	vp 	60.11
987 	mgr 	47.70
969 	exec 	40.62
927 	veep 	34.34
892 	rep 	31.35
885 	md 	30.89
872 	prexy 	29.98

though admittedly they aren’t the majority

in fact looking more closely we have decided to eat our words and take an even more negative position on this, that dv would be proud of

999 	manger 	70.62

Laugh Out Loud And Pardon Our French

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

Speedy said:

Wow!

I thought I did well this morning with 28.

28 is good.
But not surprising like 5. I was surprised.

nice, what was the sequence

adapt this despoiler* if you like

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

0123456789012345678901
500 	bought 	21.69
1098765432109876543210

*: yeah yeah

also note that looking through their https://semantle.novalis.org/nearby_1k/bWFuYWdlcg== nearest words list we’re a bit inclined to disagree with what’s been included, namely a whole bunch of what really would be abbreviations rather than “true words for the purist”, like

997 	vp 	60.11
987 	mgr 	47.70
969 	exec 	40.62
927 	veep 	34.34
892 	rep 	31.35
885 	md 	30.89
872 	prexy 	29.98

though admittedly they aren’t the majority

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5 manager 100.00 FOUND!
4 manage 28.23 820/1000
3 organize 16.62 (cold)
2 operate 12.51 (cold)
1 use 7.39 (cold)

sarahs mum said:

5 100.00 FOUND!
4 28.23 820/1000
3 16.62 (cold)
2 12.51 (cold)
1 7.39 (cold)

that escalated quickly

we find search patterns interesting and it’d be similarly of interest if the game provided a way to map out the guesses in some kind of chart

And what of homonyms? Say ‘pound’: is ‘strike’ or ‘dog’ closer to the answer?

Witty Rejoinder said:

And what of homonyms? Say ‘pound’: is ‘strike’ or ‘dog’ closer to the answer?

I think sometimes one and sometimes the other.

The other day when I solved in 19 I started with field. And it was a good opening score. And so I picked paddock and it was low. And so I picked fence and it went up. And then I picked boundary and it went up lots. And then I had some words that rated badly. Ground rated well. Oval did too. Tried cricket and zoomed up list. Then bowler and batsman were really reall close and the answer was bat.

Witty Rejoinder said:

And what of homonyms? Say ‘pound’: is ‘strike’ or ‘dog’ closer to the answer?

https://semantle.novalis.org/nearby_1k/cG91bmQ=

928 outstrike 33.85

821 chilidogs 30.50
711 bulldog 28.57
618 dogdom 27.31
616 dogger 27.31
563 bulldogged 26.86
130 dognapped 24.00

some questionable ones there

SCIENCE said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

And what of homonyms? Say ‘pound’: is ‘strike’ or ‘dog’ closer to the answer?

https://semantle.novalis.org/nearby_1k/cG91bmQ=

928 outstrike 33.85

821 chilidogs 30.50
711 bulldog 28.57
618 dogdom 27.31
616 dogger 27.31
563 bulldogged 26.86
130 dognapped 24.00

some questionable ones there

Whatever the system is, it does generally appear to focus on one particular meaning, both for the target word and for guesses.

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

And what of homonyms? Say ‘pound’: is ‘strike’ or ‘dog’ closer to the answer?

https://semantle.novalis.org/nearby_1k/cG91bmQ=

928 outstrike 33.85

821 chilidogs 30.50
711 bulldog 28.57
618 dogdom 27.31
616 dogger 27.31
563 bulldogged 26.86
130 dognapped 24.00

some questionable ones there

Whatever the system is, it does generally appear to focus on one particular meaning, both for the target word and for guesses.

and the “next nearest word” hint is fairly next nearest to useless, with plurality generally conferring “similarity” (though as we’ve suggested, “relatedness” or “association” or “closeness” is probably more appropriate) of around 70 arbitrary units

the better target words we find have chains of approach that include distinct polysemisms in approximately equal proportion

SCIENCE said:

dv said:

SCIENCE said:

https://semantle.novalis.org/nearby_1k/cG91bmQ=

928 outstrike 33.85

821 chilidogs 30.50
711 bulldog 28.57
618 dogdom 27.31
616 dogger 27.31
563 bulldogged 26.86
130 dognapped 24.00

some questionable ones there

Whatever the system is, it does generally appear to focus on one particular meaning, both for the target word and for guesses.

and the “next nearest word” hint is fairly next nearest to useless, with plurality generally conferring “similarity” (though as we’ve suggested, “relatedness” or “association” or “closeness” is probably more appropriate) of around 70 arbitrary units

the better target words we find have chains of approach that include distinct polysemisms in approximately equal proportion

So yeah it’s too garbagey for me and I’ve stuck to my guns in refusing to play it.

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
 500 	dogmeat 	37.06
10987654321098765432109876543210

seemed a bit off

SCIENCE said:

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
 500 	dogmeat 	37.06
10987654321098765432109876543210

seemed a bit off

stuck on 825/1000

Have you got it out Science?

You found it in 116!

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

Have you got it out Science?

You found it in 116!

nice

yeah we got this

I ended up fking around for like another 100 plays before we got there

I’ve been stuck on 994/1000 for hours now. So close.

sarahs mum said:

I’ve been stuck on 994/1000 for hours now. So close.

Word 994 that I had out was MOBBED. I also had words like HORDE and SURROUNDED.

Then answer was GREET. Surprising to me. And that folks is why DV doesn’t like this game.

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

I’ve been stuck on 994/1000 for hours now. So close.

Word 994 that I had out was MOBBED. I also had words like HORDE and SURROUNDED.

Then answer was GREET. Surprising to me. And that folks is why DV doesn’t like this game.

I don’t like it either.

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

I’ve been stuck on 994/1000 for hours now. So close.

Word 994 that I had out was MOBBED. I also had words like HORDE and SURROUNDED.

Then answer was GREET. Surprising to me. And that folks is why DV doesn’t like this game.

I don’t like it either.

yeah we got fkd by yesterday and bizarrely “mob” was fkn far despite how close “mobbed” was but even then yeah we got 996 and nothing

looking through today’s though it seems more legit’ so

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
 500	weather	22.49
10987654321098765432109876543210

much more legit’ we promise

You found it in 42!

the last half dozen games I have started with verbs that cover a lot of possible conversations. Like use, grow or eat. Today I hit the green on my second go. Still took a while.

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 42!

the last half dozen games I have started with verbs that cover a lot of possible conversations. Like use, grow or eat. Today I hit the green on my second go. Still took a while.

34 for me today. I usually start with ‘money’ and ‘monkey’, and today it was the latter that seemed to send me off in the right direction.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 42!

the last half dozen games I have started with verbs that cover a lot of possible conversations. Like use, grow or eat. Today I hit the green on my second go. Still took a while.

34 for me today. I usually start with ‘money’ and ‘monkey’, and today it was the latter that seemed to send me off in the right direction.

I also like that start option. For a while I was starting with inside or outside.

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
500 	annulus 	25.77
10987654321098765432109876543210

too close

my second guess this morning got me to 625/1000. One hundred tries later and I am stuck on 796/1000.

You found it in 102!

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
500 	enculturation 	26.41
10987654321098765432109876543210

interesting one today

You found it in 32!

First guess…straight into the green.

But…it wasn’t all smooth sailing.

You found it in 73!

sarahs mum said:

First guess…straight into the green.

But…it wasn’t all smooth sailing.

You found it in 73!

I found it in 50 today, but my average is currently 103.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

First guess…straight into the green.

But…it wasn’t all smooth sailing.

You found it in 73!

I found it in 50 today, but my average is currently 103.

I felt so close having got out so many green words.

my current average…95.04

You found it in 26!

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 26!

Well done. That would have saved a lot of tedium.

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 26!

Well done. That would have saved a lot of tedium.

:)

sarahs mum said:

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 26!

Well done. That would have saved a lot of tedium.

:)

looking at them nearest words, seems entertaining if a bit concerning

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
500 	usurp 	31.20
10987654321098765432109876543210

here you go

SCIENCE said:

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
500 	usurp 	31.20
10987654321098765432109876543210

here you go

Got something better than these?

I’m stuck, I just keep going backwards.

46 tempt 44.00 972/1000
56 provoke 41.65 956/1000
29 coerce 39.68 931/1000

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
500 	usurp 	31.20
10987654321098765432109876543210

here you go

Got something better than these?

I’m stuck, I just keep going backwards.

46 tempt 44.00 972/1000
56 provoke 41.65 956/1000
29 coerce 39.68 931/1000

well we got there in the end but as you know we take the scenic route and typically take a few hundred guesses, it’s faster on a laptop than on a smartphone

since dv’s here we continue to point out that there are merits, you could play Family Feud all day, or just some free association word games

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

we’ll ask https://semantle.novalis.org/ to tease and tempt you all with the following spoiler

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
500 	usurp 	31.20
10987654321098765432109876543210

here you go

Got something better than these?

I’m stuck, I just keep going backwards.

46 tempt 44.00 972/1000
56 provoke 41.65 956/1000
29 coerce 39.68 931/1000

well we got there in the end but as you know we take the scenic route and typically take a few hundred guesses, it’s faster on a laptop than on a smartphone

since dv’s here we continue to point out that there are merits, you could play Family Feud all day, or just some free association word games

I’m up to 114. But I am making no headway.

2 make 33.51 731/1000

It was looking good at the start.

sarahs mum said:

2 make 33.51 731/1000

It was looking good at the start.

interestingly we didn’t use any of the 4 you mentioned here, instead it took ages to get within 1000

24 _ 29.41 267/1000

then ages more to get in again

57 _ 32.06 598/1000

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

2 make 33.51 731/1000

It was looking good at the start.

interestingly we didn’t use any of the 4 you mentioned here, instead it took ages to get within 1000

24 _ 29.41 267/1000

then ages more to get in again

57 _ 32.06 598/1000

I like my theory of starting with common verbs.
However the ‘make’ here is a different meaning to the one I expected.

I started with..

1 use 22.50 (cold)

best guesses….

46 tempt 44.00 972/1000
56 provoke 41.65 956/1000
29 coerce 39.68 931/1000
———-

and the answer…resist.

damn.

sarahs mum said:

best guesses….

46 tempt 44.00 972/1000
56 provoke 41.65 956/1000
29 coerce 39.68 931/1000
———-

and the answer…resist.

damn.

took us 250 don’t worry

You found it in 66!

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 66!

I got it in 60 today, which brings my average down to 99.50.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 66!

I got it in 60 today, which brings my average down to 99.50.

That’s close to Bradman’s average.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 66!

I got it in 60 today, which brings my average down to 99.50.

I blew out my average yesterday. It’s now 92.68.

Peak Warming Man said:

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 66!

I got it in 60 today, which brings my average down to 99.50.

That’s close to Bradman’s average.

It is, except mine is filled with annoyance and frustration.

Peak Warming Man said:

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 66!

I got it in 60 today, which brings my average down to 99.50.

That’s close to Bradman’s average.

And Auntie’s post office box number in your capital city.

You found it in 41!

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 41!

or you could be us

LOL

so did you go the artistic route or the seafaring route or both

SCIENCE said:

so did you go the artistic route or the seafaring route or both

I bumped into the sea faring route but did go the artistic route to the end. I actually only had three greens which is so much better than filling in the entire field of green ones..

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

so did you go the artistic route or the seafaring route or both

I bumped into the sea faring route but did go the artistic route to the end. I actually only had three greens which is so much better than filling in the entire field of green ones..

The writing route took me nowhere, and at 114 I randomly typed a seafaring word, then got it in 129.

My average is now 100.52, up from yesterday’s 99.50.

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 41!

No I didn’t.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

so did you go the artistic route or the seafaring route or both

I bumped into the sea faring route but did go the artistic route to the end. I actually only had three greens which is so much better than filling in the entire field of green ones..

The writing route took me nowhere, and at 114 I randomly typed a seafaring word, then got it in 129.

My average is now 100.52, up from yesterday’s 99.50.

A challenge to those here who have boycotted Semantle might be to guess today’s word using only the information shown above.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

so did you go the artistic route or the seafaring route or both

I bumped into the sea faring route but did go the artistic route to the end. I actually only had three greens which is so much better than filling in the entire field of green ones..

The writing route took me nowhere, and at 114 I randomly typed a seafaring word, then got it in 129.

My average is now 100.52, up from yesterday’s 99.50.

mine dropped to 90.90.

I am up to guess 114.

I got to 990/1000 at guess 69 and have made no progress since then.

And it is worse than normal because all the words are violent words. Just a long list of awful words.

I also think that that news this morning about the amount of men on tiktok verbalising their imaginative ways of killing women…well…it’s still fucking with my brain. How come you can’t show breastfeeding women but you can allow that?

I hope tomorrow’s word is kinder.

sarahs mum said:

I am up to guess 114.

I got to 990/1000 at guess 69 and have made no progress since then.

And it is worse than normal because all the words are violent words. Just a long list of awful words.

I also think that that news this morning about the amount of men on tiktok verbalising their imaginative ways of killing women…well…it’s still fucking with my brain. How come you can’t show breastfeeding women but you can allow that?

I hope tomorrow’s word is kinder.

funnily enough that’s exactly the number of guesses we took

we agree that violence in media is problematic

indeed we do wonder about the source material this game is based on because the other less violent meanings of the polyseme barely even feature in top 1000

some example semantic fails and also some à bit closer

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901
launched	3.33
sip	12.20
glass	16.73
liquor	12.39
framed	16.43
took	20.11
photograph	19.46
filmed	24.22
goal	32.87
10987654321098765432109876543210

unusual distribution of associations in our opinion

I give up.

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

I am up to guess 114.

I got to 990/1000 at guess 69 and have made no progress since then.

And it is worse than normal because all the words are violent words. Just a long list of awful words.

I also think that that news this morning about the amount of men on tiktok verbalising their imaginative ways of killing women…well…it’s still fucking with my brain. How come you can’t show breastfeeding women but you can allow that?

I hope tomorrow’s word is kinder.

funnily enough that’s exactly the number of guesses we took

we agree that violence in media is problematic

indeed we do wonder about the source material this game is based on because the other less violent meanings of the polyseme barely even feature in top 1000

yes. that was a horrible answer to a horrible word game.

You found it in 31!

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

I am up to guess 114.

I got to 990/1000 at guess 69 and have made no progress since then.

And it is worse than normal because all the words are violent words. Just a long list of awful words.

I also think that that news this morning about the amount of men on tiktok verbalising their imaginative ways of killing women…well…it’s still fucking with my brain. How come you can’t show breastfeeding women but you can allow that?

I hope tomorrow’s word is kinder.

funnily enough that’s exactly the number of guesses we took

we agree that violence in media is problematic

indeed we do wonder about the source material this game is based on because the other less violent meanings of the polyseme barely even feature in top 1000

yes. that was a horrible answer to a horrible word game.

I got it in 106 today, but as in previous games I thought I was in a time warp. These top 1000 words seem to have a common theme.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

funnily enough that’s exactly the number of guesses we took

we agree that violence in media is problematic

indeed we do wonder about the source material this game is based on because the other less violent meanings of the polyseme barely even feature in top 1000

yes. that was a horrible answer to a horrible word game.

You found it in 31!

I got it in 106 today, but as in previous games I thought I was in a time warp. These top 1000 words seem to have a common theme.

still seemed a bit violent today but that could just be us, there were other trajectories to approach it

LOLWTF

See also:

• Wordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15589/
• Semantle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15630/
• Quordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15737/
• Nerdle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15743/
• Turdle http://void.byethost10.com/turdle.html

SCIENCE said:

LOLWTF

See also:

• Wordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15589/
• Semantle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15630/
• Quordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15737/
• Nerdle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15743/
• Turdle http://void.byethost10.com/turdle.html
  

It was a fine first guess.

I am up to guess 87 for 984/1000.

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

LOLWTF

See also:

• Wordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15589/
• Semantle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15630/
• Quordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15737/
• Nerdle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15743/
• Turdle http://void.byethost10.com/turdle.html
  

It was a fine first guess.

I am up to guess 87 for 984/1000.

the top 1000 nearest are kind of interesting, certainly they expand our vocabulary significantly so despite the immensely frustrating play we would score today’s as quite instructive

sarahs mum said:

I hope you’re not biting your nails.

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

I hope you’re not biting your nails.

It might be the third day in a row where I give up in the high 990s.

sarahs mum said:

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

I hope you’re not biting your nails.

It might be the third day in a row where I give up in the high 990s.

yeah that was a weird one

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

Bubblecar said:

I hope you’re not biting your nails.

It might be the third day in a row where I give up in the high 990s.

yeah that was a weird one

no it wasn’t.

158 weird 42.48 918/1000

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

It might be the third day in a row where I give up in the high 990s.

yeah that was a weird one

no it wasn’t.

158 weird 42.48 918/1000

we mean another one where the synonyms and associations we would’ve expected, weren’t enlisted

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

yeah that was a weird one

no it wasn’t.

158 weird 42.48 918/1000

we mean another one where the synonyms and associations we would’ve expected, weren’t enlisted

You know what it is?

It’s

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

no it wasn’t.

158 weird 42.48 918/1000

we mean another one where the synonyms and associations we would’ve expected, weren’t enlisted

You know what it is?

It’s

Yes, we eventually got there, after a penultimate guess that gave us the correct angle.

We acknowledge that the word is used in quite general contexts, though dictionary does say “especially” for a specific context. We probably associate it more with that context than their source data.

In all honesty we always thought that the word was specific to that context, and all the other uses were actually metaphorical(!).

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901


	
our first and last guesses in the 1000

35	evil	34.45	628/1000

149	eyesore	38.79	847/1000

	
not in list, though associated
 – appearance
 – handsome
 – disfigured
 – deformed
 – attractive
 – visual
 – pretty
 – face
 – look

	
10987654321098765432109876543210

See also:

• Wordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15589/
• Semantle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15630/
• Quordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15737/
• Nerdle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15743/
• Turdle http://void.byethost10.com/turdle.html

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

we mean another one where the synonyms and associations we would’ve expected, weren’t enlisted

You know what it is?

It’s

Yes, we eventually got there, after a penultimate guess that gave us the correct angle.

We acknowledge that the word is used in quite general contexts, though dictionary does say “especially” for a specific context. We probably associate it more with that context than their source data.

In all honesty we always thought that the word was specific to that context, and all the other uses were actually metaphorical(!).

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901


	
our first and last guesses in the 1000

35	evil	34.45	628/1000

149	eyesore	38.79	847/1000

	
not in list, though associated
 – appearance
 – handsome
 – disfigured
 – deformed
 – attractive
 – visual
 – pretty
 – face
 – look

	
10987654321098765432109876543210

See also:

• Wordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15589/
• Semantle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15630/
• Quordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15737/
• Nerdle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15743/
• Turdle http://void.byethost10.com/turdle.html

looked at your eyesore. and got it. and I thought I had guessed that already. *kicks self again.

ta.

You found it in 23!

crazy, took us like 10 times that but what was your first 1000 pick

SCIENCE said:

crazy, took us like 10 times that but what was your first 1000 pick

16 book 22.62 419/1000

ah we got wrecked by sequence of junk like colleague, lawyer, maid, wire

SCIENCE said:

ah we got wrecked by sequence of junk like colleague, lawyer, maid, wire

I went the artist, storyteller, author, book route.

sarahs mum said:

You still here Science?

Did you get Semantle out?

Yes, no.

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901


	
9	translate	27.12	294/1000    

12	slide	35.29	811/1000    

53	tumble	51.28	977/1000    

62	plummet	73.06	998/1000    

	
10987654321098765432109876543210

then gave up after like 200 random words, we were pretty sure it was because we’d forgotten a heap of vocabulary

that said we should probably play with a thesaurus open but you know how it is, one must challenge oneself and get wrecked

See also:

• Wordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15589/
• Semantle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15630/
• Quordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15737/
• Nerdle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15743/
• Turdle http://void.byethost10.com/turdle.html

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

You still here Science?

Did you get Semantle out?

Yes, no.

(SPOILER BELOW, HIGHLIGHT TO VIEW CLEARLY)

01234567890123456789012345678901


	
9	translate	27.12	294/1000    

12	slide	35.29	811/1000    

53	tumble	51.28	977/1000    

62	plummet	73.06	998/1000    

	
10987654321098765432109876543210

then gave up after like 200 random words, we were pretty sure it was because we’d forgotten a heap of vocabulary

that said we should probably play with a thesaurus open but you know how it is, one must challenge oneself and get wrecked

See also:

• Wordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15589/
• Semantle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15630/
• Quordle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15737/
• Nerdle https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/15743/
• Turdle http://void.byethost10.com/turdle.html

90 plummet 73.06 998/1000
55 rocketing 58.29 992/1000
79 plummeting 54.43 984/1000
80 falling 45.60 950/1000

I realise I havent thought about the word ‘soar’ for a long time. I wouldn’t say that the words I think might be the closest words to it first would be ‘plummetting’ or ‘rocketting’.

sarahs mum said:

I realise I havent thought about the word ‘soar’ for a long time. I wouldn’t say that the words I think might be the closest words to it first would be ‘plummetting’ or ‘rocketting’.

Plummet is surely an antonym of soar.

You found it in 33! Slow start. Quick ending.

You found it in 47!

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 47!

You seem to be finding it easier these days.

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 47!

You seem to be finding it easier these days.

Except when I don’t.

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 47!

That is great! I got it in 244 today and have blown my average out to 102.

Also Wordle was a 5, Quordle 8, and Nerdle 4, so not my best day today :)

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 47!

That is great! I got it in 244 today and have blown my average out to 102.

Also Wordle was a 5, Quordle 8, and Nerdle 4, so not my best day today :)

I had a hard time getting to the green. But after that zoomed.

You found it in 93!

sarahs mum said:

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 47!

That is great! I got it in 244 today and have blown my average out to 102.

Also Wordle was a 5, Quordle 8, and Nerdle 4, so not my best day today :)

I had a hard time getting to the green. But after that zoomed.

yeah usually we seem to take so much longer than all youse

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 93!

another nicely polysemous one today, as everyone knows we like that kind of word more

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 93!

another nicely polysemous one today, as everyone knows we like that kind of word more

It took me me overly long to get the gist.

You found it in 63!

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

I got it in 18 today, which needed a bit of luck. Also I got Nerdle in 2, Wordle in 3, and Quordle in 8, so it’s a reasonable day today.

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

I got it in 18 today, which needed a bit of luck. Also I got Nerdle in 2, Wordle in 3, and Quordle in 8, so it’s a reasonable day today.

:)

I got 997 pretty early in the piece and then tried so many words that I filled in the green section muchly.

You found it in 35!

Out of the blue. Only had 2 in the green zone.

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 35!

Out of the blue. Only had 2 in the green zone.

lol we give up, got 997 then went for like 300 and nothing useful

sarahs mum said:

Speedy said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 63!

I got it in 18 today, which needed a bit of luck. Also I got Nerdle in 2, Wordle in 3, and Quordle in 8, so it’s a reasonable day today.

:)

I got 997 pretty early in the piece and then tried so many words that I filled in the green section muchly.

yesterday’s we completely forgot the word even existed

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 35!

Out of the blue. Only had 2 in the green zone.

lol we give up, got 997 then went for like 300 and nothing useful

My leap to the finish was from ‘oversee’ -that was 295/1000…after working out it had nothing to with employment.

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 35!

Out of the blue. Only had 2 in the green zone.

lol we give up, got 997 then went for like 300 and nothing useful

My leap to the finish was from ‘oversee’ -that was 295/1000…after working out it had nothing to with employment.

yeah we kind of forgot the target word as well though today’s wasn’t as uncommon as yesterday’s

we blame influenza

ah well maybe tomorrow

You found it in 51!

bare faced spoiler but it probably doesn’t matter

wtf does

cerate

have to do with the target

SCIENCE said:

bare faced spoiler but it probably doesn’t matter

wtf does

cerate

have to do with the target

got me.

SCIENCE said:

bare faced spoiler but it probably doesn’t matter

wtf does

cerate

have to do with the target

Definition of cerate : an unctuous preparation for external use consisting of wax or resin or spermaceti mixed with oil, lard, and medicinal ingredients First Known Use of cerate 15th century, in the meaning defined above

hth

The Rev Dodgson said:

SCIENCE said:

bare faced spoiler but it probably doesn’t matter

wtf does

cerate

have to do with the target

Definition of cerate : an unctuous preparation for external use consisting of wax or resin or spermaceti mixed with oil, lard, and medicinal ingredients First Known Use of cerate 15th century, in the meaning defined above

hth

unctuous

ADJECTIVE
excessively flattering or ingratiating; oily.
“he seemed anxious to please but not in an unctuous way”
synonyms:
sycophantic · ingratiating · obsequious · fawning · servile ·

(chiefly of minerals) having a greasy or soapy feel.
synonyms:
greasy · oily · fat · oleaginous · pinguid · adipose · sebaceous

645 seism 29.28
625 akim 29.05
619 metin 28.92
375 boder 26.21
90 tagal 24.38

lol bizar

SCIENCE said:

645 seism 29.28
625 akim 29.05
619 metin 28.92
375 boder 26.21
90 tagal 24.38

lol bizar

have you got it out?

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

645 seism 29.28
625 akim 29.05
619 metin 28.92
375 boder 26.21
90 tagal 24.38

lol bizar

have you got it out?

yes but it took 150 tries to get just 5 of them in the 0 to 500 range so a bit of a silly

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

645 seism 29.28
625 akim 29.05
619 metin 28.92
375 boder 26.21
90 tagal 24.38

lol bizar

have you got it out?

yes but it took 150 tries to get just 5 of them in the 0 to 500 range so a bit of a silly

I got…

9 work 26.54 421/1000

But then spent a long time working out what meaning of work they wanted.

sarahs mum said:

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

have you got it out?

yes but it took 150 tries to get just 5 of them in the 0 to 500 range so a bit of a silly

I got…

9 work 26.54 421/1000

But then spent a long time working out what meaning of work they wanted.

that was our initial at 22 but we doubled up with plurals and the like

You found it in 14!

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 14!

+100

fuck we’re retarded

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

You found it in 14!

+100

fuck we’re retarded

My method paid dividends.

On the days I get it out easily I feel sort of sad because it is over without a struggle. If it takes a struggle I am also sad because stupid.

Basically I am readily sad.

sarahs mum said:

On the days I get it out easily I feel sort of sad because it is over without a struggle. If it takes a struggle I am also sad because stupid.

Basically I am readily sad.

That’s a bit sad

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

On the days I get it out easily I feel sort of sad because it is over without a struggle. If it takes a struggle I am also sad because stupid.

Basically I am readily sad.

That’s a bit sad

yeah.

stuck on 990/1000.

But all my words are awesome. or spectacular. or astonishing.

sarahs mum said:

stuck on 990/1000.

But all my words are awesome. or spectacular. or astonishing.

They certainly are

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

stuck on 990/1000.

But all my words are awesome. or spectacular. or astonishing.

They certainly are

It’s unbelievable.

Just too awesome.

sarahs mum said:

stuck on 990/1000.

But all my words are awesome. or spectacular. or astonishing.

Tried stunning?

Bubblecar said:

sarahs mum said:

stuck on 990/1000.

But all my words are awesome. or spectacular. or astonishing.

Tried stunning?

stunning is not extraordinary.

did you get it out science?

sarahs mum said:

did you get it out science?

nah we gave up again, the solution was kind of unexpected

Absolute.

How was that unbelievable or astonishing or amazing?

sarahs mum said:

Absolute.

How was that unbelievable or astonishing or amazing?

yeah, today’s seems a little more understandable

completely unrelatedly, we learnt a new word today

claque

sarahs mum said:

Absolute.

How was that unbelievable or astonishing or amazing?

It’s almost as though it is a trash game

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

Absolute.

How was that unbelievable or astonishing or amazing?

It’s almost as though it is a trash game

nah but like gambling you mix in small wins with the big losses and people will play

It took a while. It wasn’t as hard as I was making it out to be.

You found it in 92!

You found it in 44!

well that was fucking weird
guess things are different in the 21st century

SCIENCE said:

well that was fucking weird
guess things are different in the 21st century

Try and keep up man.

It’s only got 78 years left.

stuck on 557/1000 atm.

sarahs mum said:

stuck on 557/1000 atm.

Okay. I know they exist. I don’t like where this conversation is going because I don’t get this shit.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

72 thermostat 33.68 777/1000
19 manual 30.57 557/1000
66 switch 30.30 536/1000
68 ignition 29.21 422/1000
29 machine 28.11 265/1000
38 device 27.60 161/1000
35 hand 26.96 18/1000
30 automatic 26.93 15/1000

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

stuck on 557/1000 atm.

Okay. I know they exist. I don’t like where this conversation is going because I don’t get this shit.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

72 thermostat 33.68 777/1000
19 manual 30.57 557/1000
66 switch 30.30 536/1000
68 ignition 29.21 422/1000
29 machine 28.11 265/1000
38 device 27.60 161/1000
35 hand 26.96 18/1000
30 automatic 26.93 15/1000

don’t worry the answer is in no way violent but it was a surprise to us

SCIENCE said:

sarahs mum said:

sarahs mum said:

stuck on 557/1000 atm.

Okay. I know they exist. I don’t like where this conversation is going because I don’t get this shit.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

72 thermostat 33.68 777/1000
19 manual 30.57 557/1000
66 switch 30.30 536/1000
68 ignition 29.21 422/1000
29 machine 28.11 265/1000
38 device 27.60 161/1000
35 hand 26.96 18/1000
30 automatic 26.93 15/1000

don’t worry the answer is in no way violent but it was a surprise to us

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

114 dashboard 40.98 956/1000
99 gearshift 39.89 944/1000
109 accelerator 34.96 821/1000
86 shifter 34.52 807/1000
101 handbrake 34.30 798/1000
72 thermostat 33.68 777/1000
106 tachometer 33.47 765/1000
88 pedal 31.86 664/1000
113 glovebox 31.53 ????
105 speedometer 31.27 619/1000
19 manual 30.57 557/1000

These aren’t my words,

I want brush and aquatint and pigment.

114 dashboard 40.98 956/1000
99 gearshift 39.89 944/1000
129 cupholder 37.60 896/1000
134 armrest 35.82 852/1000
109 accelerator 34.96 821/1000
86 shifter 34.52 807/1000
101 handbrake 34.30 798/1000
133 headrest 33.87 783/1000
72 thermostat 33.68 777/1000
106 tachometer 33.47 765/1000
88 pedal 31.86 664/1000
113 glovebox 31.53 ????
105 speedometer 31.27 619/1000
19 manual 30.57 557/1000
66 switch 30.30 536/1000
111 brake 30.11 506/1000
125 pedals 30.07 503/1000
68 ignition 29.21 422/1000
123 visor 29.13 415/1000
140 sunroof 28.91 383/1000
29 machine 28.11 265/1000
83 crank 28.03 252/1000
38 device 27.60 161/1000
35 hand 26.96 18/1000
30 automatic 26.93 15/1000
102 console 25.66 (cold)
128 hood 25.55 (cold)
85 coil 25.20 (cold)
110 clutch 25.17 (cold)
119 radiator 24.66 (cold)
127 bonnet 24.36 (cold)
73 battery 24.34 (cold)
122 rearview 23.78 (cold)
132 odometer 23.25 (cold)
36 tool 23.14 (cold)
107 gauges 22.77 (cold)
115 dash 22.57 (cold)
82 piston 22.43 (cold)
39 gadget 22.31 (cold)
49 mechanism 22.00 (cold)
117 cockpit 21.35 (cold)
69 headlight 21.31 (cold)
94 wrench 21.14 (cold)
108 windscreen 20.80 (cold)
32 engine 20.51 (cold)
103 seatbelt 19.68 (cold)
71 hotwire 19.41 (cold)
31 gear 19.23 (cold)
45 cranked 18.74 (cold)
130 ornament 18.16 (cold)
91 steering 17.53 (cold)
87 gearbox 16.87 (cold)

I once knew football songs…

were you the lad that did the pushin
Put the stains upon the cushion
footprints on the dashboard upside down.

I seem to be stuck on dashboard.

sarahs mum said:

I seem to be stuck on dashboard.

Maybe go off beam for a bit, try some completely different line of thought

dv said:

sarahs mum said:

I seem to be stuck on dashboard.

Maybe go off beam for a bit, try some completely different line of thought

takeaway 2.34 (cold)
coffee 8.99 (cold)
orangutan 2.28 (cold)