Date: 12/03/2022 16:18:51
From: sibeen
ID: 1859599
Subject: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Oz won the toss and are batting. Currently 0/10.
Date: 12/03/2022 17:26:18
From: sibeen
ID: 1859620
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 12/03/2022 17:43:59
From: sibeen
ID: 1859623
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 12/03/2022 18:29:00
From: sibeen
ID: 1859639
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 12/03/2022 20:54:23
From: sibeen
ID: 1859703
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 12/03/2022 21:14:32
From: sibeen
ID: 1859704
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
Tea.2/272.
Ooops, 2/183.
Date: 12/03/2022 21:27:17
From: sibeen
ID: 1859707
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 12/03/2022 21:33:58
From: sibeen
ID: 1859710
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 12/03/2022 23:21:50
From: sibeen
ID: 1859754
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
FUCK
Smith gone for 72.
3/250
Date: 12/03/2022 23:29:43
From: sibeen
ID: 1859758
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 13/03/2022 01:04:39
From: dv
ID: 1859785
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Any idea of crowd numbers? Audience sounds loud af but a lot of the sections look empty
Date: 13/03/2022 11:53:55
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1859875
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
dv said:
Any idea of crowd numbers? Audience sounds loud af but a lot of the sections look empty
Bill Lawry said there was a crowd in.
Date: 13/03/2022 17:17:38
From: sibeen
ID: 1860074
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
FUCK
Lyon gone for 38.
4/304.
Date: 13/03/2022 17:28:29
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860075
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
FUCK
Lyon gone for 38.
4/304.
Bugger, we’ll be lucky to get 500.
Date: 13/03/2022 17:41:26
From: sibeen
ID: 1860078
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 13/03/2022 23:05:57
From: sibeen
ID: 1860133
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
FUCK
Carey, you idiot. Out for 93 to a bloke who has taken 1 wicket previously in 39 test matches.
Date: 13/03/2022 23:25:10
From: sibeen
ID: 1860137
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 16:30:18
From: dv
ID: 1860343
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
So is this going to be a 0-0 series with like 50 wickets taken in total?
Date: 14/03/2022 18:02:13
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860424
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
It was really well bowled by Lyon, getting one to grip and turn, finding the outside edge, which squirted behind point, and then he took off for a single.
But Queenslander Mitch Swepson was back there, covered good ground, picked up cleanly and the Queenslander threw down the stumps in one motion, catching Shafique well short.
Date: 14/03/2022 18:06:35
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860430
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Only 19 more to get now.
rubs hands
Date: 14/03/2022 18:07:39
From: dv
ID: 1860433
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
7 out of 15 sessions gone… 9 wickets taken
Date: 14/03/2022 18:10:42
From: dv
ID: 1860435
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
dv said:
7 out of 15 sessions gone… 9 wickets taken
Date: 14/03/2022 18:10:50
From: dv
ID: 1860436
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
dv said:
7 out of 15 sessions gone… 9 wickets taken
10
Date: 14/03/2022 19:27:43
From: sibeen
ID: 1860474
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
Pak 4/60
Date: 14/03/2022 19:32:05
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860477
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
Pak 4/60
Only 16 left to get.
Date: 14/03/2022 19:55:36
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860483
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Australia has absolutely murdered a review.
Date: 14/03/2022 19:58:29
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860484
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 19:58:32
From: sibeen
ID: 1860485
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 20:06:40
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860486
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 20:06:58
From: dv
ID: 1860487
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 20:07:10
From: sibeen
ID: 1860488
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 20:11:48
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860490
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
And in the womens world cup it looks like the English team is rogered.
Date: 14/03/2022 20:34:57
From: sibeen
ID: 1860505
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 21:22:00
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860527
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 21:23:22
From: dv
ID: 1860528
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Peak Warming Man said:
12 needed now.
They’ll need three innings just to reach the followon target
Date: 14/03/2022 21:38:17
From: dv
ID: 1860537
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
but seriously I’m not normally keen on enforcing the F.O. but in this case you might as well.
Date: 14/03/2022 21:41:41
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860539
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
dv said:
but seriously I’m not normally keen on enforcing the F.O. but in this case you might as well.
Yep.
Date: 14/03/2022 21:45:00
From: dv
ID: 1860541
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Swepson gets his first test wicket, that of Babar Azam
Date: 14/03/2022 21:58:18
From: sibeen
ID: 1860550
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
dv said:
Swepson gets his first test wicket, that of Babar Azam
Caught by a bloke born in Islamabad :)
Date: 14/03/2022 21:59:22
From: party_pants
ID: 1860551
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sometimes that last wicket is so hard to get..
Date: 14/03/2022 22:10:21
From: sibeen
ID: 1860554
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 22:10:48
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860555
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Well bugger me, Australia is batting????
Date: 14/03/2022 22:10:54
From: sibeen
ID: 1860557
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
We’re going to bat again – NFI.
Date: 14/03/2022 22:11:16
From: dv
ID: 1860558
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Peak Warming Man said:
Well bugger me, Australia is batting????
Well what do I know.
Date: 14/03/2022 22:12:52
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860561
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Well bugger me, Australia is batting????
Well what do I know.
Geophysics, oil, that sort of thing.
Date: 14/03/2022 22:16:40
From: Michael V
ID: 1860566
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
We’re going to bat again – NFI.
Strange. 408 lead and still no follow on? Just weird.
Date: 14/03/2022 22:18:27
From: dv
ID: 1860570
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Gonna look like a numpty if the track dies and the Pakistan side knuckles down in the fourth innings.
Date: 14/03/2022 22:19:35
From: Ian
ID: 1860571
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Michael V said:
sibeen said:
We’re going to bat again – NFI.
Strange. 408 lead and still no follow on? Just weird.
Ya, hard to follow.. Too many shagged out, injured bowlers?
Date: 14/03/2022 22:29:05
From: party_pants
ID: 1860581
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Ian said:
Michael V said:
sibeen said:
We’re going to bat again – NFI.
Strange. 408 lead and still no follow on? Just weird.
Ya, hard to follow.. Too many shagged out, injured bowlers?
ever since a certain match in India ….
Date: 14/03/2022 22:43:00
From: sibeen
ID: 1860589
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 14/03/2022 22:46:14
From: dv
ID: 1860590
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
Great Catch
I thought your line was something else
Date: 14/03/2022 22:52:25
From: sibeen
ID: 1860591
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
dv said:
sibeen said:
Great Catch
I thought your line was something else
When you’re over 430 runs in front with 9 wickets in hand we go to alternate scripts.
Date: 14/03/2022 22:56:10
From: Michael V
ID: 1860592
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
Great Catch
I thought your line was something else
When you’re over 430 runs in front with 9 wickets in hand we go to alternate scripts.
Alternative?
Date: 14/03/2022 23:02:45
From: sibeen
ID: 1860595
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Michael V said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
I thought your line was something else
When you’re over 430 runs in front with 9 wickets in hand we go to alternate scripts.
Alternative?
No, I go to this one every time we are over 430 runs in front with 9 wickets in hand.
Date: 14/03/2022 23:24:18
From: dv
ID: 1860604
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Ah well at least they are piling on the runs. Not sure what the dec target would be
Date: 14/03/2022 23:32:46
From: sibeen
ID: 1860607
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Stumps 1/81. Only 489 in front.
Date: 14/03/2022 23:35:26
From: dv
ID: 1860609
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
So what’s the plan? Just bat like mad for 20 overs, declare and hope to nip a couple out by lunch?
Date: 15/03/2022 15:35:59
From: Michael V
ID: 1860848
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Interesting.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-15/australia-pakistan-when-follow-on-was-last-used/100910002
Also Aussie Women remain unbeaten at the world cup after today’s victory over the Windies, just as emphatic a win as over NZ the other day:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-15/cricket-world-cup-australia-defeats-west-indies/100909250
Date: 15/03/2022 16:09:58
From: Michael V
ID: 1860861
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-15/pakistan-vs-australia-second-test-karachi-day-four-live-blog/100911574
Date: 15/03/2022 16:35:34
From: Michael V
ID: 1860880
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Labuschagne chops on for 44, and Australia declares with a 505-run lead.
Labuschagne was just trying to up the rate with a pull shot to a ball on a pretty good length and smashed the ball on to his stumps.
And that’s enough for Pat Cummins, calling Australia in on 2-97. Pakistan is “chasing” 506 runs to win, but more realistically, they have five-and-three-quarters of a session to survive to salvage a draw.
Date: 15/03/2022 18:03:14
From: sibeen
ID: 1860906
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
At the current run rate, and assuming Australia bowls 90 overs a day, Pakistan has this game well in hand and will complete the win sometime next Monday.
Date: 15/03/2022 18:15:22
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1860911
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
At the current run rate, and assuming Australia bowls 90 overs a day, Pakistan has this game well in hand and will complete the win sometime next Monday.
Way back, way way back Aus played a timeless test against South Africa.
It had to be abandoned because the passenger boat they were travelling on had to leave.
Date: 15/03/2022 18:50:32
From: sibeen
ID: 1860922
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 15/03/2022 20:36:34
From: party_pants
ID: 1860970
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
get some wickets ya bastards!!
Date: 15/03/2022 23:36:50
From: sibeen
ID: 1861027
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Stumps.
Pakistan 2/192.
Require another 314 runs for victory.
Date: 16/03/2022 00:03:12
From: dv
ID: 1861043
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
Stumps.
Pakistan 2/192.
Require another 314 runs for victory.
Doable
Date: 16/03/2022 15:50:47
From: Michael V
ID: 1861303
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-16/pakistan-vs-australia-day-five-second-test-karachi-live-blog/100914864
Date: 16/03/2022 17:15:06
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1861340
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
We could do with a FUCK OFF or two right now.
Date: 16/03/2022 17:53:18
From: sibeen
ID: 1861366
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 16/03/2022 17:54:59
From: Michael V
ID: 1861369
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Peak Warming Man said:
We could do with a FUCK OFF or two right now.
Here’s one.
Date: 16/03/2022 18:28:58
From: Michael V
ID: 1861381
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
LUNCH: Pakistan 3-254 (Babar 133*, Fawad 3*), trailing by 251
Date: 16/03/2022 19:33:59
From: dv
ID: 1861399
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Azam eyeing his first double ton…
Date: 16/03/2022 19:47:03
From: sibeen
ID: 1861401
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
FUCK OFF
slightly delayed telecast
Date: 16/03/2022 22:22:54
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1861469
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
I think it’s time to shake hands and go and have a cold beer.
Date: 16/03/2022 22:24:27
From: dv
ID: 1861472
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Not sure what Cummings was thinking but it seems it is not going to work out for him.
Date: 16/03/2022 22:25:42
From: party_pants
ID: 1861475
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Peak Warming Man said:
I think it’s time to shake hands and go and have a cold beer.
Yeah OK.
Mind you I started an hour or so ago, I have just opened my third. There’s still a few left in the fridge, help yourself.
Date: 16/03/2022 22:27:01
From: sibeen
ID: 1861477
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Peak Warming Man said:
I think it’s time to shake hands and go and have a cold beer.
The Pakis will have no part of that.
Date: 16/03/2022 22:30:36
From: dv
ID: 1861478
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
I suppose you never know … crack this partnership and hammer the newbies.
Date: 16/03/2022 22:32:51
From: dv
ID: 1861480
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 16/03/2022 22:45:18
From: party_pants
ID: 1861486
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Well played Sir, but fuck off anyway
Date: 16/03/2022 22:46:36
From: party_pants
ID: 1861488
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 16/03/2022 22:47:12
From: sibeen
ID: 1861490
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 16/03/2022 22:47:21
From: dv
ID: 1861491
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
dv said:
I suppose you never know … crack this partnership and hammer the newbies.
What did I tell ya
Date: 16/03/2022 22:49:25
From: sibeen
ID: 1861492
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 16/03/2022 22:49:33
From: party_pants
ID: 1861493
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
We’ve taken the new ball.
Date: 16/03/2022 23:05:09
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1861494
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
party_pants said:
We’ve taken the new ball.
You can’t just take it without paying for it.
Date: 16/03/2022 23:08:07
From: party_pants
ID: 1861495
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 16/03/2022 23:08:22
From: party_pants
ID: 1861496
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
We’ve taken the new ball.
You can’t just take it without paying for it.
this is cricket
Date: 16/03/2022 23:09:46
From: sibeen
ID: 1861497
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 16/03/2022 23:28:18
From: dv
ID: 1861507
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Not a very warm welcome to test cricket for Swepson but them’s the breaks.
3 wickets needed
Date: 16/03/2022 23:30:22
From: sibeen
ID: 1861508
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 16/03/2022 23:31:34
From: party_pants
ID: 1861509
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
FUCK ME
I might just open another beer instead
Date: 16/03/2022 23:32:38
From: sibeen
ID: 1861510
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
FUCK ME
I might just open another beer instead
Perhaps that is wise.
Date: 16/03/2022 23:41:29
From: sibeen
ID: 1861512
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Date: 16/03/2022 23:45:27
From: party_pants
ID: 1861517
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Ah well. Time has expired, so it is a draw. Well done Pakistan for saving it with a great second ininngs after their dismal effort in the first.
Still think the follow-on should have been enforced….
Date: 16/03/2022 23:47:16
From: sibeen
ID: 1861518
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
party_pants said:
Ah well. Time has expired, so it is a draw. Well done Pakistan for saving it with a great second ininngs after their dismal effort in the first.
Still think the follow-on should have been enforced….
+1
Date: 16/03/2022 23:48:09
From: dv
ID: 1861520
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Hmm they shake hands because with two balls left and three wickets remaining they figure it is all over.
Which given the circs is probably fair but it should be noted you can get a run out off a no ball…
Does look like Cummings made a bad call but fair play to Pakistan, that was an amazing come back.
Date: 17/03/2022 00:01:03
From: Ian
ID: 1861524
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Does look like Cummings made a bad call
—
It sure af does
Date: 17/03/2022 00:01:57
From: sibeen
ID: 1861525
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
Ian said:
Does look like Cummings made a bad call
—
It sure af does
Language, mate. We have standards to uphold.
Date: 17/03/2022 00:04:12
From: Ian
ID: 1861526
Subject: re: Second Test Aus vs Pak
sibeen said:
Ian said:
Does look like Cummings made a bad call
—
It sure af does
Language, mate. We have standards to uphold.
FUCK UP